The Terror, thank the long absent lord, is as reliable as a broken clock or the information guide in a WB cartoon ...
Faced with the usual abundance of riches, the pond decided to go petulant Peta, on the principle that prunes and nattering negativity are a boon to regularity ...
Oh wait, the pond has seen this movie before, but it's always a goodie ... please excuse the pond while it gets some popcorn ...
Ah, that's better, no, nope, no we can't, not now or ever, so there, sucks boo ...
Now the great thing about having seen a movie before, is that all the lines can be recited as the picture unfolds, as if at a midnight Rocky Horror screening ...
Oh just look at the bludgers ... why don't they do something useful, like scribble a rant for the Terror
Now there are many lines in that gobbet that are adorable, but the pick for the pond wasn't the usual guff about how little harm Australia does - dinkum Aussie coal for the world, oi, oi, oi - it was that immortal scientific line, "Scientific fact or not."
Apply this argument with Einstein or Newton any time you like. Sure, Prof, you might say that for every piece of stupidity in the Terror, there should be an equal and opposite reaction, but don't go all scientific on the pond. After all, scientific fact or not ...
And so to the next gobbet, which will be illustrated with a snap of diabolical monster ...
It's about climate change?
Oh come on prof, scientific fact or not ...
Shocking ... but as for those well-heeled greenies, cruising around in their Prius, stirring resentment at how lucky and filthy rich they are, how shocking is that?
Oh come on prof, scientific fact or not ...
Shocking ... but as for those well-heeled greenies, cruising around in their Prius, stirring resentment at how lucky and filthy rich they are, how shocking is that?
Oh everyone had great fun with that one (the rest of the AFR story is easily googled), with those damned greenies reminding Cory of the need for battery power - the dear sweet lad having recently ranted about the uselessness of giant uneconomic batteries ...
Indeed, indeed, more here, and thank the long absent lord that Cory is the very last person to admit that solar panels are the answer to his growing energy needs.
Talk about scientific fact ... or not ...
And now, scientific fact or not, it's on to the next, and sadly, the last, gobbet of petulant Peta...
But that last line is a ripper worthy of note.
Scientific fact or not, she has the hubris to mention fast broadband?
Actually that's just one of a tidy set of quotes compiled here ...
Yep, scientific fact or not, thanks to petulant Peta and the onion muncher, the country has powered up to really fast broadband ...
More painful reading here ...
The pond would have liked to have gone on, but encountered a system error ...
Instead, the pond got nostalgic for the good old days, thanks to Pope, with newer, but no fresher papal insights available here ...
Is it just me, or are the Petulant Pet's "big little lies" getting more and more hysterical by the day ?
ReplyDeleteI did like this one: "Right now China's emissions are 20 times those of Australia [yeah, and "right now", China's population is 58 times that of Australia] and even if they meet their Paris Agreement commitments, by 2030, China's emissions will be 50-60 times ours."
By 2030, Australia's population is projected to be 28.68 million [it's all those refugees and immigrants, you know] and China's is projected to be 1403 million: 1403/28.68 = 48.9 - a significant relative decrease on today's 58:1 - but somehow, according to the Pet Pet, China's emissions will supposedly increase by 2.5 to 3 times by then so that China's emissions per capita finally catches up with Australia's.
Does that sound like scientific fact or not to you ?
Ah GB, the pond sees you've decided to attempt a rational, considered discussion with Peta. That way lies madness, and the pond must counsel against it. Embrace the irrational, become infatuated with irrelevant comparisons, and enjoy the scientific facts, or not ...
DeleteAaargh, I reckon I was infected by the Bookworm virus back in High School ... err, sorry, Secondary College, days when on a strange whim I paid over my 3 shillings and nine pence (earned on morning paper rounds - I even delivered the Argus for a couple of years) for the Penguin paperback edition of Robert H Thouless' 'Straight and Crooked Thinking'[1] to which my psychic immune system had no defence.
ReplyDelete[1] I still have it on my bookshelf - that's how virulently persistent that virus is ! Don't make my mistake, folks.