Tuesday, September 01, 2026

In which much distracts the pond before Dame Groan and the bromancer turn up for a spring furriner snake bashing day ...


The doomsayers were out in force this day.

It was gloom, gloom, gloom all the way ...



If you're deluded enough to think that spring starts on a given calendar day, you might be plunged into a deep depression by the fear mongering at the lizard Oz.

EXCLUSIVE
Sydney heading for 18pc annual home price crash
House prices in the nation’s biggest market are falling at a rate on track to deliver the largest annual decline in 40 years, with data centres to drag on the economy.
By Matthew Cranston and Mackenzie Scott

Vulgar youffs rejoicing at a better chance to get into the property market should think again, or better still, just STFU.

There were graphs and arrows plunging precipitously and gloomy, grimacing faces, and so why not vote for One Nation?



There was an interactive too, which plunged the pond into gloom because the key activity - studying real estate prices as if you were reading the Nine rags - couldn't make it into the archive...

INTERACTIVE
National property prices: how has your suburb fared?
FULL LIST | Just nine of the 1057 suburbs across Sydney and Melbourne experienced price growth over the winter period as sellers face the start of the spring selling season on the back foot.
By Mackenzie Scott

Dammit, the pond's old suburb, Camperdown, had suffered a massive, incalculable loss of -2.7%!

Gloom, gloom, gloom.

More gloom followed in the third of the triptych of sorrows ...

ECONOMY
Chalmers’ AI hopes dashed by Treasury advice
Treasury warns AI will not fix Australia’s record-low productivity slump
The AI boom fuelled hopes of transforming Australia’s economy and fixing a long-term decline in productivity. New advice to the Treasurer has dampened the hype.
By Perry Williams

The pond immediately turned to the immortal Rowe, always eager to help out the tech bros...



Over on the extreme far right, the Australian Daily Zionist News welcomed a new contributor ...

Wong’s doctrine: One rule for Israel, another for ADF
The Foreign Minister should reflect on the adage about people in glass houses throwing stones.
By Glenn Kolomeitz

The reptiles never tire of stout-hearted defenders of ethnic cleansing and an apartheid system. Don't anyone dare say an unkind word about the ADF in Gaza and the West Bank.

And Max was in full triumphalist Trumpian mode ...

Trump’s new Iran sanctions should put China on notice
Washington has spent years chasing Iranian shell companies while the banks keeping them alive walked free – until now.
By Max Meizlish

It wasn't good enough to take on the wretched Canucks, it was time for a war with China!

...That scrutiny should extend to the Iranian oil that is frequently rebranded as Malaysian and sold to Chinese buyers. China’s reported oil imports from Malaysia vastly exceed what Malaysia itself reports exporting. That discrepancy ought to be a warning for banks involved, especially since China purchases roughly 90 per cent of Iran’s exported oil. More pressure from Treasury could help keep them from ignoring it.
Treasury’s latest action suggests the US may finally be moving beyond chasing Iranian shell companies toward threatening the foreign financial infrastructure that keeps them alive. That would be a meaningful break with the approach of past administrations. But for it to be a success, the campaign needs to be sustained – and it needs to reach China.
Max Meizlish is a research fellow at the Foundation for Defence of Democracies. He has worked in the US Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control. This article was first published in The Wall Street Journal.

Strange that the bromancer should leave the war with China to the WSJ, but whatever.

Has there ever been a bigger or better defender of democracies than mad King Donald? Have a sip with Max ...



The pond was reminded of John Hanscombe yesterday in The Echnida...

When Donald Trump signed one of his first executive orders of his second term, renaming the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America in January 2025, the world gasped.
It hadn't seen such arrogance since Benito Mussolini declared his ambition to turn the Mediterranean into an Italian lake in the 1930s.
Fast forward to last week and Trump's executive order renaming Lake Ontario "Lake America" was met with a global shrug. Even his musing that he might similarly rename the Pacific or Atlantic garnered a collective 'Whatever'.
Not only has the US president squandered American prestige with his disastrous war with Iran, he's used up his shock value. Flooding the zone with outrageous distractions - Lake America timed to draw attention from the six-month milestone of the Iran war - has worn thin.
Even investors have grown weary of jumping at every bombastic broadside Trump posts on Truth Social. Last month, Business Insider said markets had become numb to the president's social media posts. Wall Street, it said, had come to think of his aggressive missives as background noise.
The wild swings in crude oil prices on the back of Trump's social media posts we saw a couple of months ago have calmed down. Trading houses which signed up for advance notice of Trump posts at great cost must now feel a little scammed.
US voters aren't paying much attention either, with record numbers disapproving of the way Trump had handled the war and the domestic economy. He can rant and rave and rename until he's blue in the face but if no one's paying attention he might as well be the old man shouting at clouds.
London-based financial intelligence website TACT explained why the world has tuned out to Trump: "What began as fearful but intent listening, then morphed into stunned incredulity, has now become dismissal. Statements made one day are brazenly, seemingly without irony, and unapologetically reversed the next. Threats are issued and then diluted. Red lines appear and disappear almost at random. At this point, many governments, markets and foreign observers no longer treat pronouncements from Washington as reliable indicators of policy at all."
There are signs this reality - that few still take him seriously - is slowly dawning on Trump himself. Weeks out from the mid-terms, with support for the Republicans circling the drain, the president is already playing the blame game. If they lose the House of Representatives, he tells anyone still listening, it won't be his fault, it will be theirs.
All reality shows have a shelf-life and Trump's second term is no different. What was once novel has grown stale. The roasts and insults no longer shock. The boasting, bragging and name-calling which once appalled reasonable people now fall on deaf ears. We once shouted at the TV; we now check our phones or hit the mute button. We've heard it all before.
The Trump show has become boring.

Meanwhile, Geoff was chambering a round explaining how it was time to turn to Gina's pet ...

Pauline Hanson version 4.0 ain’t nothing like 1996
Treating the 2026 model of One Nation like previous versions is a recipe for disaster for Labor and the Coalition.
By Geoff Chambers

See how the reptiles help out with the Pauline agenda by way of a teaser trailer:



Sure, it was couched as a warning, but what Geoff meant was that the major parties should get on board with the reptiles' agenda, as envisioned by Pauline, or else ...

One Nation, which has made hay of Labor’s struggles to fix the migration system and cost-of-living and housing crises, is preparing for all scenarios, including Albanese calling an early election from August next year. While Albanese’s first choice is to run full-term to May 2028, One Nation campaign boss James Ashby doesn’t want to be caught on the hop.

That talk of the migration scene paved the way for a classic Dame Groan, and if you think today is the first day of spring, you might have been surprised that the old biddy stayed in classic one trick pony mode ...



The header: ALP migration cut is more slogan than substance; Don’t let Brit holiday makers off the hook on regional employment requirements. That’s one of several ways the Albanese government could tackle the immigration system mess.

The caption for the cynical, smirking prat: Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke is having trouble restoring order and control to the migration program. Picture: Bianca De Marchi/AAP

The grumpy old chook was primed to rail at those bloody furriners ruining everything ...

You know the line: the Albanese government has reduced net overseas migration by 45 per cent. It will be taking a balanced approach to refining the immigration settings while acknowledging the important role played by skilled migrant workers. Those are the talking points.
The truth is the Home Affairs Minister is having a great deal of trouble ensuring that the target for the NOM of 245,000 this financial year is reached and 225,000 in subsequent years. Recall here that the NOM is the difference between long-term arrivals and long-term departures, where long-term is defined as at least 12 months in a 16-month period.
Changes to visa requirements can alter the number of arrivals, although they need to be quite radical to change the number to any significant degree. Hiking up visa fees, something the government has done, also can have a marginal effect on arrival numbers.
For those already in the country on temporary visas, however, the challenge is even greater as the scope for temporary visa holders, with the help of lightly regulated migration agents, to game the system to stay is considerable. The government needs to focus on both sides of the equation.
So let me help here and outline a series of sensible changes that will bring down the NOM while making sure immigration is beneficial for all of us and not just for sectional interests. It is important that the addition to the population flowing from immigration is reduced, and quickly. Not only is the pressure on housing and other resources unacceptable, the stress on social cohesion is also palpable.

The old biddy is here to help, what with the pristine virginal sands of our beaches littered with Brit-sourced cockroaches ... Backpackers lap up the delights of destinations such as Bondi Beach There are no requirements for British passport holders to undertake regional employment. Picture: Monique Harmer




You filthy vile polluters of exquisite locations, you bloody useless Brits, with your ancient delusions of empire and your devotion to pies served with dead horses!

Let me start with working holiday makers. Their number has exploded from 41,000 in mid-2022 to 237,000 earlier this year. This surge in numbers is principally the result of a special deal obtained by the British government, which enables British passport holders to secure three visas, each of one year’s duration. There are no requirements for them to undertake regional employment. The first obvious change is to reinstate the requirement for regional employment for all working holiday maker visa holders. Six months in a 12-month period would seem appropriate. British working holiday makers currently are working in bars in Bondi and driving Ubers in Melbourne, not picking fruit in the regions.
While the number of international student visas has levelled off in recent years, the total number is still excessive. Earlier this year, there were more than 600,000 student visa holders plus another 267,000 on graduate visas. This latter figure has more than doubled from the pre-Covid figure, with the number of secondary applicants rising more rapidly again.
There are several changes that can be made to the rules governing student visas that would cut the number of applicants as well as reduce the amount of gaming that goes on. Changes to enrolment – from a university course to a vocational course, for instance – would not be permitted, leading to cancellation of the visa. Any further visa application would need to be made offshore.

As for universities, the pond knows for a fact that you can stray onto a campus, and suddenly be confronted by the most terrifying sights ... furrin students, looking un-Australian, deviant and with terrorist intent ... Nearly 74,000 family members were attached to temporary graduate visas in Australia at the end of June. Picture: NCA NewsWire / Jeremy Piper




The pond doesn't know why the old biddy is so obsessed with the different and the other, it would probably require a degree in psychology or a bout of post-grad Freudianism or an extended college induction into nativism, but then the malignant chook would gloat that nativists had been pushed out of any chance of a degree by the invading horde ...

Only international students undertaking PhD level study would be allowed to bring partners and children. All other international students would have no right to attach secondary applicants to their visas. This would align Australia with several other countries that admit large numbers of international students.
There may be a case for abolishing graduate visas altogether. It is not unreasonable to expect international students to return to their home countries once they have finished their studies.
To be sure, there are some courses that require a subsequent year of internship or equivalent to qualify, so there may need to be some exceptions.
Bear in mind here that about one-third of international students undertake courses in commerce/business/management, double the proportion of local students. These courses generally do not require formal internships after graduation.
The number of skilled employment temporary residents also has exploded, with the most recent numbers recorded at 260,000. Employers can sponsor workers with skills on the skilled occupation list, with visa holders able to stay for at least four years.
The distinct impression is one of an unwillingness on the part of employers to train local workers, resorting instead to the easier option of importing already trained workers. The content of the list is difficult to understand, with more occupations simply being added over time. But it is telling that there is no accelerated pathway for imported construction workers given the clear shortage of tradies across the country. Increasing the minimum salary that migrant skilled workers must be paid also should be considered as a policy option.
Reducing the humanitarian intake to its long-term level of 13,750 a year is a sensible change. This would cut the intake from the current figure of 20,000 plus community-sponsored refugees. While this change was floated and then ruled out by the Albanese government, the sheer size of the fiscal drain associated with the refugee intake makes this a compelling adjustment. According to Treasury figures, those on humanitarian visas impose a lifetime fiscal cost of $367,000 each.
Restricting the number of new entrants is one thing; getting those on temporary visas to leave is another thing. Deducting New Zealanders who have a right to be here, there are about 2.3 million temporary visa holders living the country. Setting a target of the ratio of temporary visas to the population – 5 per cent, say – would be a good policy guide.

As always, this sort of rant allows the reptiles to drag in a relevant News24 rant ... Sky News host James Macpherson says the number of people on temporary visas has gone from 1.9 million to 2.9 million under Anthony Albanese.




Sheesh, did the pond say News24? 



Dammit, it will always be Sky Noise down under to the lizards of Oz and to the pond, because how else can you keep living in the past, preferably the 1950s, when Ming was king, as Dame Groan produced a final gobbet of groan ...

Australia is essentially seen as a soft touch, with temporary migrants able to legitimately string out their residence for well more than a decade. Why pay a people-smuggler when you can simply fly in? Illustrating this mess is the rapidly rising number of temporary migrants on bridging visas; the total number exceeded 400,000 this year.
There are several changes that would accelerate departures, including insisting on offshore application for visas, including for family and parents. Bridging visas would not be available to those waiting on a visa decision.
Making sure the administrative tribunal follows government policy prescriptions is also important but may require legislative change. Allowing a convicted failed asylum-seeker to stay in the country because of “visa stress” should simply not be permitted.
For all its talk, the Albanese government has done very little to fix the mess that the immigration system has become. The reluctance to offend the left of the party or take on the vested interests, including universities, parts of the business community, the states and some ethnic groups, has led to an increasingly shambolic system.
It’s a long way back to an orderly and controlled migration program that serves the national interest. Implementing the changes outlined above would be a good start.

Could the reptiles top a standard groaning?

Of course they could. The bromancer was in full recantation mode, and the reptiles gave him a bloody big splash ...



Making full use of AI, the pond turned Forgive me Father Lying Rodent, for I have sinned, into the terminology appropriate to the Catholic confessional, Ignosce mihi pater, mus mendax, nam peccavi.

The pond proposed a dozen Hail Mary's and ten Our Fathers as an expression of full repentance and contrition



The header: Why I was wrong about the Tampa affair; Howard was right and ahead of the game. All countries now want to control their borders. The nation is in his debt.

The caption for the lying rodent in full flight: John Howard announces to the parliament that Australian SAS troops had taken control of the Tampa, August 2001. Picture: Newscorp

Brothers and sisters, before beginning the reading of the bromancer, can the pond begin - with proper respect for his devout Catholicism - with a reading from the bible, thanks to this site

Admittedly it's not the pond's preferred KJV, but tykes think that's a heresy, so no matter ...




Deeply moved, the pond plunged into an example of Xianity in action ...

In the case of the Tampa incident, 25 years ago, John Howard established effective border control for Australia. At the time I thought he badly over-reacted to a small situation, but he was much more right than wrong. As a consequence, there’s little illegal immigration to Australia by boat. The lasting tribute to the policy is that both sides of politics enforce it today.
But it was an incredibly messy, confusing process with lots of missteps, which is typical in democratic politics.
Tampa evolved thus: a boatload of 438 mainly Afghan asylum-seekers left Indonesia bound for Australia. The boat got into trouble and was rescued by a Norwegian flagged vessel, the Tampa. Under normal practice they should have been returned to safe harbour in Indonesia. But the people on board threatened to harm themselves or the crew if not taken to Christmas Island. That would mean getting to Australia and settling here.

Almost immediately there came an AV distraction featuring an exquisitely framed bromancer ... Greg Sheridan on the 2001 Tampa affair.




As the remorseful prophet spoke, lashing himself for his thought crimes, the pond turned again to the bible...




Yea, verily, that imported Pom, the onion muncher, was full of piety and a fear of furriners...because back in the day we never took action to stop those invading Brits ...

The Howard government took unprecedented, determined action to stop the Tampa landing at Christmas Island. It sent the SAS to take control of the Tampa. Alexander Downer secured the agreement of Nauru and the people were transported there for refugee claims to be processed.
The Howard government was determined nobody would get to stay in Australia permanently through arriving illegally by boat. A tiny number of the Tampa people eventually came to Australia but Howard killed the people-smuggling business to Australia.
The policies were unravelled under the governments of Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard, and the boat flows started again in earnest. Remarkably, Tony Abbott repeated Howard’s success, ending the people-smuggling trade a second time. Labor learnt its lesson and has subsequently embraced the Howard-Abbott policies.
So Tampa was a turning point in modern Australian history, a turning point for the Howard government, and prefigured the kinds of policies virtually every advanced Western nation would eventually attempt to run in relation to illegal arrivals.

But have they, did they? 

Aren't we under a terrifying seige?

Surely, it's time to turn to Pauline, or perhaps to what virtually every advanced Western nation would want for those pesky, difficult, uppity furriners ... another bible reading ...



Just look at the hordes, fear them! Asylum seekers on board the MV Tampa in 2001.



Why if the laws of the sea hadn't been ignored, right now they'd be littering our virgin beaches...

At this point, the bromancer allowed himself a teeny weeny billy goat butt ...

These issues were then, and remain now, vexed and complex. Although I think Howard, for whom this column has the greatest admiration, got the policy basically right, there were two or three very bad elements to Australian government behaviour at the time. They were bad then and they remain bad in retrospect.

Hush now, regrets there might be a few, but no need to go into any of that tasteless, unsavoury business.

Stay strong, stay true to your deeply felt and held Xian principles, and do a reverse pike billy goat butt in the form of a "However" ...

However, let me not hide in the shadows. I judged Howard far too harshly at the time and I was wrong about the basic need for national governments to assert full control over their borders.
Partly, my mistake, like a lot of commentators, was to fail to recognise the change in the nature of the refugee phenomenon.
I was a child of the Cold War and refugees were mainly folks escaping communist tyrannies. The first issue I ever wrote about as a journalist, the first issue I became passionately involved in myself, was trying to help our South Vietnamese allies and friends after their nation was invaded in 1975 by the North Vietnamese Army, with Chinese and Russian backing, while we and the Americans had deserted our brothers in arms.
Buddhists, Catholics and anyone associated with the former South Vietnamese government were persecuted by the communists. This was put into the shade by the communist genocide next door in Cambodia, but the situation in Vietnam was severe enough. Our worst prime minister, Gough Whitlam, refused to take more than a tiny handful of South Vietnamese, even among those whose lives would be compromised or forfeit because of their association with Australia.
Whitlam demonised the Vietnamese refugees and famously declared: “I’m not having those (expletive) Vietnamese Balts coming into this country with their religious and political prejudices against us.”

And yet it turned out that in the long run Gough was right, at least in the eyes of the bromancer, the lizard Oz hive mind, Pauline and the lying rodent ...

No need for any of those wretches to infiltrate the country ... Armed SAS troops leave Christmas Island and head out on a local barge to the Norwegian ship Tampa. Picture: Megan Lewis / The Australian




At this point the pond might recount the tale of a child who left a Cambodian camp to cross the seas on a rickety boat, obtaining both a medical and a law degree, and offering much to the country in the process, as do all those workers who keep public health care and the hospital system afloat, but no time for any of that ...

The United States led a magnificent international campaign to resettle Vietnamese refugees, who have been a fantastic success in Australia. This paradigm followed the pro-refugee sentiment in Europe after World War II and the collective feeling of searing regret and remorse that affluent nations had done so little to help Europe’s Jews in the 1930s.
However, applying that paradigm to people movements in the 21st century was out of date, wrong on the facts, unworkable and morally confused. This century has seen massive movements of predominantly Muslim populations from North Africa and the Middle East. Some have certainly experienced persecution. Others are driven by economic considerations. Some exhibit desperation. This can be born out of persecution or poverty at home. But there can also be “positive desperation”, the unbelievable reward of living in an affluent welfare society as opposed to a poor society.

At this point, the much sinning bromancer was tormented again, and his mind filled with gnawing doubt ...

Although I now think the Howard government was right to assert border control, and some of my columns at the time were mistaken, I’d have two substantial criticisms of the government’s actions at the time that still stand.
First, it needlessly demonised the individuals on the Tampa, who were distressed human beings. Second, it was either unbelievably slack or some of its members, not Howard, were actively knowing in publishing an untrue story that another boat carrying asylum-seekers threw their children overboard to force the navy to rescue them. The children overboard story was not important in Howard winning the subsequent election but it wasn’t true. Governments should be sedulous in telling the truth.

But judge ye not what we have done, not when we can blame others ...

Here are some other facts worth noting. The Norwegian government harshly criticised Australia at the time. Yet Norway welcomes 500 UN-assessed refugees a year, compared with Australia’s 20,000.

But do we? Will we? Didn't the pond read in Dame Groan that the current government, hounded by Pauline and the reptiles of Oz, are heading towards Norway?

Reducing the humanitarian intake to its long-term level of 13,750 a year is a sensible change. 

Otherwise we'll be flooded ...Armed SAS troops departing Christmas Island for the Norwegian ship Tampa. Picture: Megan Lewis / The Australian



And here the bromancer showed his truly Xian humanitarian heart ...

Most importantly, no human being died in the Howard operation, or in the later Abbott operation. Yet when Labor softened these policies and the boat trade resumed, hundreds of people drowned making the illegal journey. So who is the true humanitarian?
Also, the Indonesians couldn’t say this publicly but they were actually happy, first with the Howard operations, even more so with Abbott’s. This was evident in their quiet co-operation with elements of both sets of policies. I had the great pleasure of interviewing Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono several times when he was president of Indonesia. At the end of his tenure, a person in his administration, as close to the president as any human being could be, told me off the record how happy the president was with Abbott’s policies because they solved the problem, for Australia and for Indonesia.
In all Western nations courts have undemocratically hindered democratic governments from taking reasonable policy actions, a huge part of the problem.

Final thoughts? 

Well as any Xian brought up on the Crusades knows, a little bashing of Islamics never goes astray in the hive mind ...

Finally, while the overwhelming majority of Australia’s Muslims are good citizens, unregulated Middle Eastern immigration to Western countries has not been an unqualified success. The long traditions of Islamist antisemitism and extremism have posed real problems.
All countries now want to control their borders. Howard was ahead of the game. The nation is in his debt.
Greg Sheridan is The Australian’s foreign editor. 

There endeth the lesson and the pond can now revert to that earlier talk of tech bros ...




For those wondering, a friend forwarded this news of Wilcox ...




For worried souls, the tower of newspapers in the background has gone, which is just as well, because it's always the right o'clock for a good nuking or World War III ...





Monday, August 31, 2026

In which the reptiles keep helping out Pauline, the Australian Daily Zionist News goes about its business, and the Caterist is the new Aboriginal voice ...

 

The pond was startled to see not one note from a correspondent yesterday, and struggled with the intermittent archive today, but hey nonny no, when the going gets tough for herpetology students, the tough get going.

The pond did wonder if the elephant in the room of the Nepal valley tragedy would make an appearance in the lizard Oz's Monday regulars.

That elephant did make an appearance in The Graudian, making some basic points in Sunil Acharya's Nepal-Tibet flood: this is the cost of not acting in the face of the climate crisis

...The Nepal Himalaya is changing rapidly. Glaciers are retreating, while warming is altering the conditions in which glaciers, permafrost and mountain slopes remain stable. The climate in which these hazards occur is changing, and continued warming will make an already difficult risk landscape harder to manage. That is why the global response cannot stop at adaptation.
The first task must be to stop making the crisis worse. The countries that benefited most from decades of fossil fuel-driven growth have a particular responsibility to cut emissions rapidly. They also have far greater resources to do so. 

But the reptiles are as devoted to climate science denialism as One Nation is ...and so the reptile coverage transferred all hope to an impotent god, ‘Only God can save us, maybe no one can’: Nepal’s death toll rises as hopes fade. (While the links were still working for the pond, who knows if they'll keep on working).

In fine reptile form, Amanda Hodge's coverage made not one mention of a key contribution to the disaster.

Subsidiary coverage in the form of Fears for Townsville woman on ‘lifetime’ trip as search for 42 Australians continues also studiously avoided any hint of any possible causes.

The pond read the rolling allegedly "Live" reptile coverage so others didn't have to embark on a futile search. Nary a mention ...

Instead the more than One Nation curious lizard Oz continued to pump up the volume for Gina's pampered pet, with Geoff leading the way...

One Nation surges past Labor as Anthony Albanese vows to defeat ‘dishonest’ populists
Pauline Hanson’s One Nation has reclaimed its mantle as Australia’s most popular party, as Anthony Albanese sounds the alarm on ‘dangerous’ right-wing politics.
By Geoff Chambers

 The closest Chambers came to noting One Nation's devotion to climate science denialism, coal and gas came via the "coal" in coalition ...

In his usual way, the indefatigable Geoff backed up with a second shot ...

COMMENTARY by GEOFF CHAMBERS
Home truths on a nation divided by house price changes
As Anthony Albanese defends his property tax crackdown, Newspoll reveals the scale of generational division over whether house prices should increase, stay the same or fall.

Wisely Geoff avoided any mention of the reptiles devotion to coal, and instead blamed it all on Labor ...




That's enough to catch the drift ...

Simpleton Simon also went about the business of helping One Nation ...

Labor’s fiscal furphies have turned into campaign of industrial-scale deception
You don’t get to escape the reality of a productivity and inflation crisis by howling back at the truth-tellers.
By Simon Benston




The pond only noted simplistic Simon as a chance to point out the extreme visual tedium involved in these propaganda exercises ...

That exact lead snap was also recycled from a piece by the canny Cranston ...




Just for the record that erroneous part of the lizard Oz jihad could be found here ...

Labor’s hidden super tax to hit $372bn worth of assets despite promises to carve out retirees
A hidden tax buried in Labor’s capital gains rules has exposed $372bn in superannuation assets to higher levies, with one of Australia’s biggest funds demanding an urgent rethink.
By Matthew Cranston

The mediocrity, the lack of imagination, the incessant repetition might work for the hive mind ...




... but not for the pond, though the promotion of Pauline has been a boon to cartoonists of the immortal Rowe kind ...



Meanwhile, The Australian Daily Zionist News went about its business, even as reports of settler violence in the West Bank continued to surge, not to mention a successful Israeli bombing of Gaza which managed to take out a three year old child.

Benji attempted to limit the violence to "a handful of rioters" but the government of Israel is complicit in the ethnic cleansing campaign.

Extreme Zionist Major Mitchell was away from the golf course to do his usual business ...

Soft Labor fails the key test on combating extremism
The federal government’s reaction to Israel’s decision to not prosecute soldiers over an Australian aid worker’s death has exposed a break from decades of Labor foreign policy tradition.
By Chris Mitchell
Columnist

The Major offered crocodile tears and the notion it was all a terrible mistake ...



Another familiar name turned up ...

Why Richard Flanagan is in denial on the true sources of Jew hate
Writers overreach. I have done it myself and no doubt will again. But there is overreach, and then there is Richard Flanagan.
By Nick Dyrenfurth
Contributor

Nick explained to Flanagan that it was all a Soviet plot.



Enough already.

Flanagan is worth a listen, or if missed, worth a transcript read - Nick with his reductionism and wandering in ancient times to avoid the present not so much ...

The new McCarthyism: Gaza and Australia – Richard Flanagan

It's a long read, but this amused the pond, what with it relating to herpetological studies ... ...

...Australians were, last time I looked, still allowed to say stupid and offensive things if they are within the law. We wouldn’t have the Murdoch press if it were otherwise. Tony Abbott, for example, has said more than his fair share of stupid and offensive things from far loftier platforms than an obscure website, including when as prime minister he said of the Sri Lankan government’s murderous behaviour at the time of the Sri Lankan civil war, ‘‘We accept that sometimes in difficult circumstances, difficult things happen.”...Difficult things like rape, torture and massacring tens of thousands of civilians. Yet last year our ex-prime minister published a history of Australia with Harper Collins. I hear no calls for Tony Abbott’s book to be pulped, and nor would I call for such a thing, nor the gutting of a major publisher.

The pond can only stomach so much lizard Oz Daily Zionist News in one day ...

Rather than promote these reptiles - they're in the intermittent archive for masochists - the pond decided to turn to Haaretz again for a geography lesson on the art of ethnic cleansing ...

What Is E1? The West Bank Area Behind Israel's Most Explosive Settlement Plan




It's touching how there are still some who hope for a Palestinian state, and even imagine one exists, but that bird flew its coop long ago. Instead there's been insidious creep ...




And credit where credit is due, Benji himself has been at the heart of moves to kill off any notion of a Palestinian state:



Flanagan didn't mention apartheid in his talk, but it's there for all to see in the notion of one highway for me, and the low road for thee ...

And after all that, the pond was just left with the flood water whispering Caterist and any hope that he'd devote attention to the causes of the Nepal flood were quickly dashed ...

Instead his outing began with an indecent appropriation of Aboriginal art, an uncredited, offensive and wretched offering ...




The pond was so enraged by the Caterist, and by the notion that with the Voice quenched, the Caterist was the right sort of voice, that it reduced the humbug to screen caps ...




There was just a final gobbet, and then the ugly business was done ...




That allowed the pond to do a catch up with the infallible Pope and the immortal Rowe ...





And speaking of lakes ...



Strictly for masochists, and at an hour's length, best viewed on an appropriate device while sitting on the toilet ...




Sunday, August 30, 2026

In which Polonius bores your socks/stockings off, but One Nation, Zoe and the lizard Oz editorialist save the day ...

 

After yesterday's excess of reptiles, the pond was looking forward to a quiet meditative Sunday, and who better to dull the senses and induce a sense of a wondrous reptile lotos land?

Why are we weigh'd upon with heaviness,
And utterly consumed with sharp distress,
While all things else have rest from weariness?
All things have rest: why should we reptiles toil alone,
We only toil, who are the first of things,
And make perpetual moan,
Still from one sorrow to another thrown:
Nor ever fold our wings,
And cease from wanderings,
Nor steep our brows in slumber's holy balm;
Nor harken what the inner spirit sings,
"There is no joy but calm!"
Why should we only toil, the roof and crown of things? (The full thingie here)

But Polonius is all for toiling and perpetual moan ...




The header: How Hanson’s plan to oust ALP could backfire; One Nation has a preference problem. And it’s one that could hand another election victory to Labor.

The caption for the hair-dyed ranga: One Nation leader Pauline Hanson. Picture: Getty Images

Suddenly the pond was awake again and wildly excited.

The pond was delighted that the party that had no truck with 'leets and the establishment and the likes of investment bankers decided to give all that nonsense away, and go the full establishment hog. A bit like the end of Animal Farm.

Of course this home of dinkum Oz workers and battlers, oi, oi,  loves investment bankers ...





The son of famous Moorice?

So the apple doesn't fall far from the tree ...




But wait, there's more ...

Referencing Hanson’s calls for Australia to be a “monoculture”, Newman said Japan and Korea were “monoculture[s]”.
“[They’re] absolutely super successful nations who pride themselves on that thing. If I ever thought that One Nation was racist or any of these sorts of things, why would I join it? I mean, it’s … almost hypocritical of me to do so.”
He said Hanson’s inability to remember the name of the Japanese prime minister, Sanae Takaichi, in a News24 documentary was “an on-the-spot sort of moment”.
“She knows who Prime Minister Takaichi is,” he said.
Asked what the party’s plan was to foster social cohesion, Newman said: “We’re going to get rid of wokery, right?”

Wokery, right on!!




Oh there were grand plans to nuke the country even if there's actually no need to save the planet, what with Malcolm Roberts having clearly shown that climate science is a mere religious cult ... 'Unelected swill': One Nation senator Malcolm Roberts calls for Australia to leave UN

From his very first speech in the Senate he was on the money ...

...Roberts said his own passion for politics and policy had been “unleashed” during the “grassroots uprising of the Australian people” against the reviled and dishonest carbon dioxide tax.
He then questioned the consensus that global temperatures have been rising as a consequence of industrialisation.
He said that, from the 1930s to the 1970s, during the period of the greatest industrialisation in human history, atmospheric temperatures actually “cooled”.
“Another inconvenient fact, temperatures statistically have not been warming since 1995,” he said.
“Temperatures are now cooler than 130 years ago and this is the reverse of what we’re blatantly told by the Bureau of Meteorology that has manipulated cooling trends into false warming trends.”
He said Australians could not rely on information from Australian government bodies and institutions.
“I have used freedom-of-information requests, correspondence and reports from the heads of the CSIRO, the Bureau of Meteorology, the UN [and] universities to show there is no data proving human use of hydro-carbon fuels effects climate. None,” he said.
“Yet the core climate claim is that carbon dioxide from our human activity will one day, some day, catastrophically warm our planet.”

Hello Nepal. Malcolm sends his best glacier-melting wishes.

And this seemed unnecessary what with there being no need to combat the climate hoax:


...Mr Newman, who will contest the Labor-held seat of Cessnock in the Hunter Valley, said he would like to see less business regulation and a greater investment in non-renewable forms of energy.
"In California, which runs a very heavy net zero, very left-wing kind of style of government, since COVID they've lost 1.2 million people who've fled to other states," he said.
"Now they're all in Texas because of cheap energy and low taxes.
"We want to get cheap energy, just like Florida and Texas, back into New South Wales to help make businesses more competitive."
Mr Newman described the plan to close the Eraring coal-fired power station as "economic suicide" and said coal and nuclear should be part of the state's future energy mix.
He said he would be happy to host both a nuclear power plant and nuclear waste dump in the Hunter, subject to public consultation.
"The Labor government run the three-eyed fish narrative, which is the low-resolution politics we should expect," Mr Newman said.
"I've worked very closely with the entire nuclear supply chain. I know how well and effectively it is all managed."

Texas? Cue The New Republic with good news.

This red state may be as MAGA as they come, but its Republicans leaders, voters, and businesses have no interest in the president’s war on renewable energy.




Maybe investment bankers aren't into the right sort of green anymore ...

Anyway, can't we become more like RFK's America? 

Think of the evolutionary benefits ...




Sheesh, in all that excitement, the pond clean forgot about Polonius and his fears. Back to the drudgery ...as Polonius seems to yearn for the glory days of the DLP, what with their well-informed members and supporters just loving themselves some fundamentalist tykery ...

Since the end of World War II, the two most successful minor parties have been the avowedly anti-communist Democratic Labor Party and the avowedly far-left Greens. And now, entering from the right, is Pauline Hanson’s One Nation party.
As Hanson made clear in the News24 documentary The Fight for the Right, presented by Chris Kenny, she has two political aims. First, for One Nation to achieve government. Second, for the Anthony Albanese-led Labor Party to lose office. The question is whether a high One Nation vote is consistent with a Labor defeat. And the answer resides in preferences.
Importantly, The Fight for the Right was fair and balanced. Kenny gave time to, and asked challenging questions of, Hanson along with the leaders of the Coalition. Namely, Liberal Party leader Angus Taylor and Nationals leader Matt Canavan.
The One Nation leader received the most airtime since she is creating more news than any other political figure right now.
The latest Newspoll has Labor with a primary vote of 29 per cent, One Nation also on 29 per cent, with the Coalition on 18 per cent and the Greens on 14 per cent.
There is still considerable time to the next federal election and political circumstances can change before then. The initial task for the Coalition is to get ahead of One Nation on primary votes. Moreover, no one knows how the teals and other independents will go. Likewise with any micro parties that choose to run candidates.
The DLP, which broke away from/was expelled by the ALP in the mid-1950s, had well-informed members and supporters.
Most DLP voters had traditionally voted ALP, but after the Labor Split they directed their prefer­ences to the Coalition ahead of Labor. DLP preferences kept Labor out of office until December 1972 and played a crucial role in the Coali­tion’s victories in 1955, 1961 and 1969.
Greens shift
The Greens emerged in the 90s as a separate party with an environmental agenda under the leadership of Bob Brown – it has since moved further to the left.
It’s fair to say that Labor is more hostile to the Greens than to the Coalition. But Greens voters are far more hostile to the Coalition than Labor. Like the DLP, the Greens have well-informed members and supporters.
It is estimated that around 90 per cent of DLP first preferences went to the Coalition before the party went out of existence in the mid-70s. Psephologist Antony Green has estimated, using Australian Electoral Commission figures, that 88 per cent of Greens preferences went to Labor in 2025. Whereas only 75 per cent of One Nation preferences went to the Coalition.
That’s a significant, and perhaps result-determining, figure.
In The Fight for the Right, Kenny put it to Hanson that she “must be worried that by splitting the right-of-centre vote” One Nation might help Labor stay in power in Victoria. The reference was to the Victorian state election to be held on November 28.
Hanson rejected the claim. She said “if you want to get rid of Labor, then you vote One Nation No. 1 and then you put Libs No. 2”. Well, that’s fine in theory. But not if, say, 25 per cent of One Nation voters in Victoria preference Labor over the Coalition. That might return the incompetent Labor government in Victoria. So far One Nation voters have not shown the preference discipline of the DLP or Greens voters.

Sorry, that's a terribly long gobbet without any visual distractions, and eventually the reptiles broke, but only so they could feature a genuine dullard ... One Nation MP David Farley MP during Question Time at Parliament House in Canberra. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman




Oh dear another distraction ...






Another rat in the ranks?

News Corp the most reliable booster of Gina's pet? 

Who'd have thunk it, but it might help explain Polonius's paranoid prattling, because it seems that One Nation voters are as discerning as DLP voters, what with Gina's pet being terribly clever, except she's apparently not...(don't ask the pond to follow all the twists in this mouse tail):

In The Australian last Tuesday, Anthony Galloway reported that the left-wing GetUp organisation – which likes to be called “progressive” – will spend at least $600,000 on campaigning against One Nation in five Labor-held seats in Melbourne. It is likely to be as successful as its failed attempt to defeat One Nation in the Farrer by-election last May.
The polls indicate that the One Nation vote surged between early December last year and early February this year. This period takes in the Bondi Beach massacre of December 14. The evidence suggests that there has been a strong reaction to the terrorist attack aimed at the Australian Jewish community as part of Australian society in general.
Moreover many Australians, particularly in Melbourne and Sydney, are angry at the disruption caused by constant protest marches against Israel’s defensive war in Gaza. The marches have disrupted life for many without any consequence at home or abroad. One Nation, so far, is the principal political beneficiary of the radical Islam-radical left unity ticket. And then there is the cost of living.
Hanson did not come to politics with a high level of education but she is clever, with an ability to cut through in a way that is intellectually unfashionable but popular. Asked by Kenny if she was intolerant of any group, Hanson responded, without equivocation, that she was “really intolerant of radical Islam”. Hanson added that she did not like the suppression of women and more besides.
Hanson is stubborn and declined to reconsider or withdraw her 1996 ill-informed statement that “we are in danger of being swamped by Asians”. She has yet to articulate a coherent economic policy. And then there is the lack of party discipline.
Few Australians would have heard of David Farley before he was the successful One Nation candidate in the Farrer by-election. This week he declared he was making the party worthy of government and explicitly disagreed with his leader on immigration. It’s not a good sign with respect to party unity.
There is talent in One Nation’s ranks – including Barnaby Joyce MP and the party’s director James Ashby. But it does not present as fit for government. Unlike the Coalition with experienced and talented politicians such as Taylor and Canavan in leadership roles. However, One Nation could possibly attain minority government status. Or it could ensure Labor’s continuation in office if its preferences leak substantially to Labor.
The DLP and the Greens managed to keep their preferred parties in office by disciplined preference flows while winning seats in the Senate. One Nation will win Senate seats and probably attain some victories in the House of Representatives at the next federal election. But it’s also capable of returning a Labor government for a third term.
Gerard Henderson is executive director of The Sydney Institute.

Barners, Tamworth's ineradicable, undying, eternal shame presents as talent?

And Polonius has kind words for the beefy boofhead and the Canavan caravan?

Here's the thing. The reptiles have, with their incessant attacks and relentless promotion of far right policies, and their many invocations of Pauline, done wonders for the promotion, enabling and facilitation of One Nation, the furriner bashing party of Murdochian dreams.

Desperate times in WA and elsewhere. No wonder Polonius is having an anxiety attack, and so is the pond ...




Now to another reptile sent by the pond to the intermittent archive ...

The rush to demonise all boys and men in the wake of scandals at the Sydney Swans and Scots College isn’t only insulting, it’s corrosive.
By Gemma Tognini
Columnist

The pond realises sending grating Gemma to the archive cornfield is wrong. 

After all, it's a heart-warming tale and the pond simply couldn't move past the amazing artwork (appallingly not credited to a living reptile), which heralded the start of the show ...




But the pond had to stay firm, or otherwise the pond might have begun to brood about domestic violence statistics ..

Domestic violence is a serious problem which impacts many NSW families. In 2021-22 an estimated 1.5 per cent of Australian women aged 18 years and over experienced violence by an intimate partner in the past 12 months.  It is estimated that 1 in 4 women (27%), and 1 in 8 men (12%) in Australia experienced violence by an intimate partner or family member since the age of 15 years.


But it's okay, garrulous Gemma can walk the streets safe at night, and a single anecdote will always triumph over data ...

And so to the new reptile favourite ...



The header: Green scheme has a billion-dollar secret; The true cost of Australia’s energy transition from parliamentary oversight is being shrouded.

Could there ever be a reptile story about renewable energy without a snap of dastardly windmills, of the kind designed to send Don Quixote and the beefy boofhead into a panic? Of course not: Wind turbines at Granville Harbour on Tasmania's west coast. Picture: Philip Young

It seems that this is only Zoe's second recorded outing for the reptiles - correspondents will recall her first masterpiece, The green energy transition: soaring bills, dead eagles.

Guess what that featured as an opening image? You didn't have to guess, did you? Those damned things that haunt Don Quixote and the beefy boofhead and mad king Donald too:




The pond would have liked to feature all of it, what with Zoe making a fair fist of becoming the reptile replacement for the Bjørn-again one...

Suffice to say that in her new outing, Zoe remains as gloomy as ever.

The wall of secrecy surrounding the cost of the federal government’s flagship renewables subsidy scheme may finally be about to crack.
The Australian National Audit Office has officially listed the Capacity Investment Scheme as part of its work program for 2026-27. As one of the least transparent federal subsidy schemes devised, the CIS is long overdue for an audit.
The government has faced sustained scrutiny over its decision not to reveal the cost of the scheme, which will commit taxpayers to paying unknown billions to wind, solar and battery developers under 20-year revenue underwriting agreements.
Until now, the Energy Minister has used the “commercial-in-confidence” claim as a get-out-of-jail-free card to continue evading every inconvenient question about how much taxpayers will have to pay.
Energy ministers running similar programs in other countries have shown far more transparency. Britain, for instance, regularly publishes the strike price of its agreements with developers, as well as the estimated annual budget impact of its Contracts for Difference scheme. In Australia, the public is told neither.
The length of CIS contracts makes the secrecy much worse. Once signed, these deals will be very difficult for a future government to unwind if they fail to deliver value for money. Of course, that’s all part of the plan.
Last year, Chris Bowen made very clear what his task was for this term of government: “I want this transition to be so locked in that a change of government can’t stop it.” If this transition is such a good idea, then why must its price tag be kept secret?
The lengths the government has gone to in avoiding transparency should be ringing alarm bells for taxpayers everywhere. Instead of being run through a government department – as is standard practice for subsidy programs of this magnitude – the CIS is being run through a private company: AusEnergy Services Limited.
ASL does not front Senate estimates. In other words, the body responsible for assessing and recommending billion-dollar CIS projects for ministerial approval is not directly accountable to parliament. Nor is ASL subject to Freedom of Information requests in the way government departments are.
And any attempt to request documents the department receives from ASL can be effortlessly knocked back with claims of confidentiality.
Appointing a private company to administer a tender process worth billions of dollars is so unusual that perhaps the only other example of this occurring is the NSW Government’s Long-Term Energy Service Agreements scheme, which is also run by ASL.
But at least in NSW the outsourcing of the LTESA scheme came with a statutory framework and regulatory oversight. The federal government opted for neither in its design of the CIS.
This highly unusual arrangement not only forces taxpayers to sign contracts blindfolded, it also erodes public trust in the ministers who lead our country. Suppose a minister were accused of approving underwriting for an uneconomic project that benefited his friends. How could he prove his innocence? Under the current design, there is no accountability mechanism that would let him.
If ministers want to maintain the trust of the public and ensure they cannot be accused of favouritism or corruption, they must embrace transparency and robust oversight – not use private companies and commercial-in-confidence claims to shield their decisions from scrutiny.
But beyond the matter of governance, an important question remains. Even the CSIRO, which insisted for years that wind and solar were the cheapest forms of new energy, has conceded the transition to renewables will increase the cost of our energy system. Is the Australian public willing to bear that cost? The answer appears to be no.
Polling commissioned by Affordable Energy Australia found more than half of Australians would not pay a single extra dollar to achieve net zero, and almost three-quarters wouldn’t pay more than $50 a year. Among communities bearing the brunt of the energy transition, willingness to pay is even lower. Another poll commissioned by Affordable Energy Australia found two-thirds of Gippsland would not pay a single extra dollar to make the transition move faster and four in five wouldn’t pay more than $50 a year.
These results suggest that once the true scale of the CIS is revealed, very few taxpayers will be in favour of such costly contracts being signed on their behalf.
Australians may support the idea of the energy transition in theory but they do not support the reality: ever-growing bills, secretive subsidies and the destruction of prime agricultural land and pristine rainforests. Consumers want cheap and reliable power first and foremost, not ideological targets.
Our government would do well to heed the words of German Energy Minister Katherina Reiche, who wrote earlier this year: “One fact has been suppressed for too long: an energy transition that ignores system costs will ruin the country it claims to save.”
Zoe Hilton is a spokeswoman for the Affordable Energy Australia campaign.

You're welcome Nepalese people. 

We'll do our very best to shrink your glaciers and produce disasters, because think of the unhappy alternatives for long-suffering folk down under.

That said, the pond was most disappointed that Zoe didn't go the nuke option this time ... and it has to be said that there's a certain repetitiousness to her offerings.

Here was the way she wrapped up her first outing, and it sounded just like her second bleat, with a faux bit of alleged data setting the Zoe pace, and the use of "rent-seekers", suggesting she's learned her reptile lexicon well ...

...Destroying the environment to save it is nonsensical. At 1 per cent of global emissions, Australia does not have any control over our own climate. What we do have control over is the direct impacts we have on our environment at the local level.
We need a rethink of our approach to environmental policy. For every industrial project, there is a trade-off between its economic benefits and the effects it has on the environment.
Wind farms are not providing the predicted net economic benefits to Australia. In fact, they are often a net cost to society as they cannot survive without ever-growing subsidies. On top of that, many are destroying the environment they were meant to preserve. Yet the federal government still plans to more than double the amount of wind capacity in the eastern grid by 2050.
It is clearer than ever that governments’ renewables targets cannot help secure cheap energy for Australia, nor will they preserve our unique natural heritage.
Australian families and businesses deserve better. It is time Australia’s leaders stop pretending the current paradigm is working. They must prioritise affordable, reliable energy so our energy system serves the needs of all Australians – not just the rent-seekers profiting off the public purse.

And with that the pond turned to the lizard Oz editorialist to help Zoe out ...





There you go, Zoe, you need to drag in a Prof, but for that you'll have to be up on your Quadrant reading, with Gazza ranting away in No Laughing Matter ... (the pond guarantees correspondents will love the portrait of Jimbo, showing the reptiles how they really should be using AI):





You see Zoe? You needed to slip in a kind word about coal, and wonder why we ever abandoned the dinkum, clean, virginal, mainstay Oz variety.

Nepalese people, you're welcome ...

And as the pond gave the lizard Oz editorialist one shot, how about another, what with rampant Zionism all the go in this weekend's Oz.

Showing off the lizard Oz editorialist was a way for the pond to avoid covering all the other stuff in the rag ...





With that done, there was just time to do a little migrant bashing, proving that the lizard Oz editorialist right on top of this particular reptile jihad could more than match Pauline at this game...




Does that mean we can ban foreign citizens like the Murdochs, plundering the hive mind with their US owned companies? Or are they so skilled at plundering that they should always be welcome?

The pond suspects that you could count on two hands the number of people who read the lizard Oz editorialist, but herpetology students should remember it's at the heart of the darkness...

And now with Xmas just around the corner - Spring is sprunging - how go things in the disunited States?




Splendid stuff, time for the usual updates ...





What a relief not to hear it pronounced "Moskowww". And fun fact, "Coat of many colours" was Dolly's favourite child ...