Wow, what a hit list.
In a time of crisis, the reptiles have risen like kero to the top of the tank to keep the mossies of dubious leftism down … but sadly, as a result the pond knew there had to be a winnowing, a culling, of the chaff or the herd, as the case may be …
Not all can survive the winnowing, not all should survive, and first to go was the oscillating fan. But the pond shed a tear for him, because he too had been blessed by the cult master this weekend, and what a ripper it is, with that evocation of the Satanic Chinese claw clutching at the mortarboard …
The oscillating fan was making a simple point.
With all this cash sloshing around, with all this largesse, what about academics, it isn't fair, they're down at the corner store and they want their share. Some might think being an academic colours this argument, and makes it a tad subjective and personal, but really, with all the squillions that are going to be in hand once SloMo's gang shakes down the tech giants, why not spare a thought for suffering academics, at least the ones with tenure, not the riff raff on short-term contracts, or horrors of horrors, the y'artz mob, whom it would be a kindness to kill off …
Must the largesse just go to News Corp?
What about the valiant academics that scribble for the lizard Oz, turn up on Sky, become part of the Speccie mob, and do their bit for Catallaxy? Must they suffer because of scruffy artyfarty, degenerate, prevert, long haired types? Surely the oscillating fan's cheekiness is wholly admirable.
Next to leave the herd was our Gracie, though the pond thought her idea simply spiffing …
What does the nation most urgently need?
Surely it's fruit pickers and the like, the ones that do the jobs that lazy Australians refuse to do. So why not bring in rich folk, and then set them to harvesting strawberries in Queensland? It's this sort of right field think that regularly makes the pond think that Who is on first …
And then the saddest, cruellest cut of all, but it had to be, the bromancer had to go, though his idea was equally spiffing …
Why didn't the pond think of it? Chuck a gigantic tantie, refuse to ship coal or other goods to China, and that'll teach 'em a lesson, good and proper. Of course it might be tricky for some …
.. but you can't trust the Chinese. They refused entry to WHO and the Donald and the rest of the world, and it was entirely remiss of the pond to think they were transparent way back when, the Donald told us so …
But no, for the moment, the bromancer had to take the walk of shame to that funny brick wall behind the door, and so did Shanners, assigned hagiographical duties this day …
Sorry Shanners, we've thrown the coal out with the bath water, and have embarked on a gigantic sulk to teach those bloody Chinese a lesson, what with the bromancer whining about access, the pond can't look beyond the way it all accords with little Johnny's fervent wish: "The Chinese will decide who comes to China and the circumstances in which they come." Because if you can't be an Orwellian dictatorship, what's the fucking point?
And so to the winners in this dangerous game, thesehunger games, when only the most useless reptiles will survive. The pond apologises, no doubt almost anyone else would have more appeal, but judges, the envelope please …
Why the dog botherer? Well the man who comprehensively fucked up Utegate is surely in a very unique* (ABC24 license number 2 squillion and one) position to explain why Malware was fucked. And besides, the pond is endlessly fascinated by the way the reptiles want to keep promoting Malware's book, drawing attention to him, and who is the pond to stand in their way?
Ah yes, 2009, who could forget it, a vintage year for fuckwits and morons …
Daily Telegraph columnist Miranda Devine, for one, wasn't wasting time with subtleties, openly pushing for Credlin's replacement to be "the person she didn't want to hire as head of communication strategy, despite various entreaties from high-level media and political figures: Chris Kenny".
Kenny, Devine wrote of her News Corp stablemate, is "in touch with the world, has the right ideas [and] shares Abbott's broad world view.
But his greatest attribute is that he's fearless and confident enough to challenge the cosy consensus thinking."
But who comprised Malcolm Turnbull's inner sanctum when the Grech/Utegate misjudgment destroyed his leadership? His chief of staff was Kenny – fearless to a fault! – while Credlin was banished to a broom closet, finishing her law degree.
Is there any dispute as to why the pond is entranced by the dog botherer?
Let's now hope that the reptiles dig up a photo showing the dog botherer engrossed by Malware's 'tome' … must keep thrusting that book in front of reptile readers, make them think of it as enticing forbidden fruit, stop the damn thing ending up in the remaindered heap before next Wednesday ...
Not a mention of the dog botherer's role in lighting the match and setting the fuse. It takes a lot of cheek to rabbit on about this, while at the same time maintaining the dog botherer's eternal refusal to contemplate climate science … because, you know …
Imagine having the dog botherer as an advisor, especially after what he and Lord Downer managed to do to Iraq … but that's another story ...
Actually, it was incendiary to that fringe element of loons, of whom the dog botherer sometimes attempted to be chief loon … the climate denialist types like the member for the Philippines …
Never mind, we're at the last gobbet, and the pond doesn't resile from its choice ...
Meanwhile, the dog botherer's singular contribution to all this is to ensure that the planet goes on being fucked on a daily basis, just like he and Lord Downer fucked Iraq and the dog botherer fucked Utegate.
It's a very unique* (ABC24 license number 2 squillion and two) record …
And now, before moving on to the next treat, what about a cleansing of the palate with a Kudelka sorbet?
The pond makes no apology for its second selection. The pond has always been loyal to prattling Polonius, through thick and thin. We've explored Shakespeare together, especially Polonius's alter ego and his contribution to literature, and ponderous pontificating, and we've delved into history … oh so much history ...
But why did the reptiles send out both the dog botherer and Polonius on the same mission? The pond humbly suggests it's because Malware gets under the reptile skin, and lodges there like a north coast tick, and that alone is worth the price of admission ...
Sublime, from a scribbler who shows an abject lack of awareness about himself every time he scribbles about his affinity with the working class …
Yes, the pond has run it before and will probably run it again, but meanwhile, just how incestuous can it get? The reptiles wouldn't offer a video of the dog botherer talking about Malware in the middle of Polonius prattling on about Malware, would they? Surely not ...
Eek, they did, obsessive compulsive heaped on obsessive compulsive …thank the long absent lord for screen caps, as we return to the one born with the curse of wanting to live in the 1950s forever, or at least in North Sydney, well away from the riff raff and the common herd ...
The pond is hoping everyone is bearing up. These are stressful times … and there's an inclination to leave the plane without a chute …
But relax, it's almost the end, the last gobbet of anal retentive obsession is to hand ...
The mutton Dutton and the onion muncher were the best attack dogs? Well yes, if you understand that they were sniping, undermining and wrecking, but not necessarily comrade Bill, so much as that deviant Malware. And all he'd done was wreck the NBN as ordered by the onion muncher. Where's the fairness in that. Just following orders.
Even so, the pond must concede that Polonius is right … what most excellent attack dogs they were …
And what's funny about it all? A born again speaker in tongues of the most devious kind was the last loon left standing …
Might the pond suggest that Polonius displays a singular inability to understand the Liberal party's internal thuggish appetite for terrorism, of the mutton Dutton kind, which would have seen almost anyone bar comrade Bill Shorten and the drover's dog romp home against this motley bunch …
Long may the follies continue, and with it the dissembling, and the distortions as to who did what to whom ...
Hi Dorothy,
ReplyDelete“As readers of Arthur Conan Doyle’s short story Silver Blaze will recall, Sherlock Holmes solves a crime by focusing on a dog that did not bark. It was, in Holmes’s terminology, another “elementary, my dear Watson” moment.”
I fear that I have to point out that it is well known that nowhere in the 56 short stories and 4 novels written by Arthur Conan Doyle did Holmes ever utter the phrase “elementary, my dear Watson”.
http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2013/08/sherlock-holmes-never-said-elementary-dear-watson/
Having done so I now find myself a pedant who is pedantically correcting another pedant. Dear Gods what have I become!
DiddyWrote
But he did actually use the word "elementary" on occasion and the Northampton Mercury's parody did contain “Elementary, my dear Potson”.
Deletehttps://quoteinvestigator.com/2016/07/14/watson/
However, indeed you have shown Polonius as merely pretending to the pedantry that he so clearly wishes to be praised and remembered for.
Yes, oh yes, DW, oh fucking yes, and you have become what you read, but at least you remember a past life where pedants were roasted on the pit of their stupidity, and you retain the benefits of past reading (unlike doddering Polonius). And here's the pond slowly making its way through the bedside Holmes as a toilet companion, and as always, someone has taken the trouble to confirm your insight, which the pond suspects is somehow the fault of the ABC:
Deletehttps://quoteinvestigator.com/2016/07/14/watson/
DW - it is meet, right and proper (as the fulsome ecclesiastics say) to do so. Particularly if it helps shift the Polony from pedantry towards - oh - useful analysis?
ReplyDeleteInteresting that the Executive Director chose a dog reference. In the time of c.....virus, I have been wondering if some of the dog botherer's problem is that he has fewer opportunities to meet dogs. All that hanging around public spaces, offering chat-up lines like 'That's a nice kelpidoodle (or whatever the fashionable hybrid is this year)' - denied him.
Oh - and doggerel responsibility for the above comment is taken by Other Anonymous
ReplyDeleteOh, I never would have guessed that.
DeleteBit of a diversion here, apologies for that. But over on twitter, has someone taken over Dame Slap's account?
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/jkalbrechtsen/status/1253868952024834048?cn=ZmxleGlibGVfcmVjc18y&refsrc=email
With just Polonius and the Doggy Bov, this is truly a sad sack Sunday. Oh for the glorious days of the proscriptive Cardinal Pell and the angry Sydney Anglicans - will we see the like of such ever again ?
ReplyDeleteBut, butt, the thing I can least grasp about the Doggy Bov is why anybody would hire him for anything ... other than self justifying rambles in the Murdoch press. Surely Malcontents had seen his performance as CoS to Alexander the Downer ? Could he really not see what he was getting ? It seems not, and what does that tell us about him ?
Yet DogBov swears that he had absolutely no contact with Godwin Grech, and what does that tell us about him ?
And these people ran our country ? What does that tell us about us ? Well we could consider DogB's closing remark: "Twice, nine years apart, Turnbull came up with climate positions that mollified Labor but alienated his own partyroom."
It certainly alienated some in the LNP partyroom, but not all, so why is DogBov making no distinction ? Hmmm curious that, isn't it.
But now on to the posturing Polonius: "Since its formation in 1944, the Liberal party has had a very pragmatic view about leadership. Put simply, it goes for winners."
Oh gosh, let's see: some rather unsuccessful Liberal Party leaders:
William McMahon (1971 - 1972) lost election to Whitlam
Billy Snedden (1972/3 - 1975) lost to Whitlam
Andrew Peacock (1983 - 1985) lost to Hawke
John Howard (first time around 1985-1989) lost to Hawke rwice
Andrew Peacock (second time 1989 - 1990) lost to Hawke
John Hewson (1990 - 1994) lost to Keating
Alexander Downer (1994 - 1995) didn't lead in an election
Brendan Nelson (2007 - 2008) didn't lead in an election
Tony Abbott (2009 - 2015) lost to Gillard
In addition, two LNP leaders lost elections as the standing PM: Malcolm Fraser and John Howatd. Howard was such a "winner" that not only did he lose office in a landslide, he lost his own safe seat.
So yes, I guess you could say that the LNP really "goes for winners". And when Labor wins its next election (may not be for a while) then Labor will have won four elections from opposition too. Oh wau.