Tuesday, January 13, 2026

In which the pond sends the entire reptile offering off to the intermittent archive, and has to turn to current 'ein Sturms in reptile Wasserglas' to fix the Wasserglas gap... ...

 

The pond regrets that - almost immediately after his return, the bromancer - as many predicted and expected - joined in the current hive mind jihad.

The pond was left with no choice but to send him off to the intermittent archive ...

Anti-Semitism thrives in mainstream progressive politics, some Islamic cultures
The Albanese government will almost certainly fail in its effort to defeat anti-Semitism because it still doesn’t understand the problem.
By Greg Sheridan
Foreign Editor

Those who want to have at him can, the pond is content to note that anti-Semitism thrives in right wing la land, but never expects the reptiles to notice.

The pond is sad, but that's the way the cookie and the current jihad crumble.

Joining him in the intermittent archive was the careening Caterist ...

‘Social cohesion’ an invitation to moral equivalence
More migrants people snub Team Australia
Sloppy talk of ‘social cohesion’ risks blurring a royal commission’s task as anti-Semitism surges. Findings by the Scanlon Foundation show some migrants and the young drifting away from ‘Team Australia’.
By Nick Cater
Columnist

Enough already about migrant people from a migrant people...and as for blather by a former Pom about Team Australia, enough already.

Joining the pair in the pond's specially constructed jihad sin bin was Ben, packing it in his usual way ...

Hate preachers, groups with terror links put on notice … at last
At last, hate preachers and Hizb ut-Tahrir face bans
The government is finally acting to ban hate groups such as Hizb ut-Tahrir and silence radical preachers. The proposed laws will have teeth, too.
By Ben Packham
Foreign affairs and defence correspondent

Devotees of the jihad will be amused by the headline leading off the digital "news" this day ...

Preach hate, go to prison
PM’s hate speech, gun reforms spark Coalition alarm
A carve out in new hate speech laws has raised alarm from Coalition sources that anti-Semitic views could still be espoused as long as a religious text is invoked, such as a passage in the Koran calling Jews and other nonbelievers ‘the worst of creatures’.
By Sarah Ison and Elizabeth Pike

Coalition alarm?

Oh they like to talk the jihad talk, but when it comes to doing the jihad gun ban walk, they tremble in the face of the gun lobby, not up there with the IRA, but still, close to the jihadists' hearts...

The pond also dismissed out of hand the standard reptile EXCLUSIVE beat up ...

EXCLUSIVE
‘Confusing mess’: Expert slams Bondi massacre ­inquiry set-up
The Albanese government has been warned the Richardson Bondi inquiry structure could see officials told what evidence they can give, potentially undermining the probe into intelligence failures.
By Ben Packham and James Dowling

This carry-on is going to last the entire length of the RC. 

That's the real reason they wanted the RC, reams of headlines and endless ravaging of Albo for a year or more ...so there's no point in encouraging the raskals at the get go, just as there's no doubting it will wound him ...

The pond also isn't interested in defending the mad Mullahs ... with the fight being led by Boyes of The Times, amazingly, given his age, at one with Gen Z..

Gen Z leads fight against Iran’s old men
Iran faces its gravest threat since 2009 as young ‘enemies of God’ spread unrest to 160 locations nationwide, challenging the regime’s control with economic grievances and social media tactics.
By Roger Boyes

To make the massacre complete, the pond also despatched ...

Tragically, the Islamist regime could ‘limp’ along
What remains for Tehran? The answer is extreme violence, now directed against its own people. Will it work? Comparison to similar revolutionary situations elsewhere suggests that it might.
By Jonathan Spyer

Discovering why the reptiles decided to give the word 'limp' scare quotes wasn't worth the effort of the read, especially as the author saw no reason to use scare quotes in his final sentence ...

A combination of both short- and long-term intervention and assistance would be the most judicious path. Absent this, the Islamic regime in Iran could limp on for a while, to the extreme detriment of Iran’s people and the wider Middle East region.

Were the reptiles being politically correct, worried that they might offend anyone with a limp? Unlikely ...but the pond will leave Spyer and Boyes to fight out the fate of Iran, as only columnists staring at keyboards and screen can do ...

Good luck to the people of Iran, they haven't had much since the CIA helped set the 'revolution' rolling.

The pond did dive below the fold but the only addition in the top six was on the same theme...

Deadly silence: regime-imposed blackouts concealing brutality demand universal legal response
History suggests that an unbridled theocratic regime – institutionalised through state-sponsored terrorism – endangers not only the Iranian people but regional and global security.
By Saba Vasefi

Speaking of unbridled theocratic regimes, will the reptiles ever get around to discussing the current state of Israel? Or the white Xian nationalists in charge of US policy.

Not likely.

The hive mind is extremely monochrome these days and the pond apologises to those who try to explore the archive in one of its drop out moments ...

Moving along, what to do ?How to manage a little Tuesday filler?

Mad King Donald is always a tempting target, as the madness grows wilder by the day ...





Instead the pond decided to borrow from Jeff Sparrow, scribbling in Crikey yesterday ...


On Sunday, The Sydney Morning Herald apologised for publishing a cartoon by Cathy Wilcox that depicted the campaign for a royal commission into the Bondi massacre as astroturfed by supporters of Israel. Today, The Australian runs an anti-Wilcox piece by Catherine West, the immediate past chair of Nine. By my count, this brings the number of articles the Oz has so far run about Wilcox’s cartoon to 10.
To be fair, the Murdoch paper possesses a certain expertise on offensive cartoons, given how regularly it lauded the late Bill Leak — as much because of his egregious bigotry as despite it. Older readers will remember how, on National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children’s Day in 2016, Leak offered an image of a swarthy, VB-clutching Indigenous man too drunk to remember the name of his son.
One can scarcely imagine how the Oz might respond if the SMH published an equivalent image directed at Jews. In the context, a cartoon relying on racialised physical characteristics for a punchline based on an offensive stereotype would look like something from Der Stürmer. Yet, when the Leak drawing led to an investigation under Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act (remember that?), The Australian launched a full-throated campaign to not only defend Leak but also laud him as a fearless truthteller.
Within a few months, the young Indigenous woman who’d sent the Leak cartoon to the commission withdrew her complaint, saying she could not cope with the harassment she felt she’d received from News Corp. Leak died the next year; The Australian ran an astonishing 33,000 words of tribute and then established an award in his name, which it has repeatedly bestowed on his son. 

Well yes, the pond does remember that fuss well, but there's no need to repeat that offensive 'toon again.

The pond also remembers this cartoon, a valiant attempt to kick Godwin's Law into a Leakian ether ...



And so did Sparrow ...

Given the paper’s current obsession with Cathy Wilcox, we might, then, recall another Bill Leak cartoon, from the height of the obsession with 18C. In September that year, Leak turned his artistic genius to the subject of equal marriage, producing an image showing gay men goose-stepping in rainbow-coloured Nazi uniforms, which he labelled “Waffen-SSM”. 
Had Wilcox invoked National Socialism in her work, the outrage from The Australian would have, of course, registered on the Richter scale. But though Leak’s drawing affronted both Jewish and gay and lesbian groups, a year later Chris Kenny still celebrated the Nazi gag as an example of Leak’s “provocative and hilarious insights” and “a biting comment on the intolerance of gay marriage activists”.
You obviously don’t need to trawl the paper’s archives for evidence of conservative hypocrisy. In today’s edition, Catherine West calls for an investigation of “how the deliberate merging of domestic hate with foreign policy serves to silence opposition to prejudice”, while, nearby, Nick Dyrenfurth flatly equates anti-Zionism with antisemitism. 
But it’s worth recalling the Leak brouhaha because it shows how sharply the Gaza genocide has reoriented a conservative movement that once prided itself on its “fuck your feelings” free speech advocacy. Back in the day, the right rallied around Leak because, as Paul Gravitas explained, “Bill saw the heart of political correctness is denial and avoidance of truth. The purpose is to reject rational debate through new norms of so-called polite behaviour — that people must not be offended, that feelings must not be insulted and that identity, whether arising from race, religion, sexuality or gender, must always be honoured.”
Today, The Australian applauds the Adelaide Festival for cutting a Palestinian author on the grounds of “cultural sensitivity”. Whereas, in 2016, it denounced, as a matter of principle, any cultural infrastructure that might limit Leak’s ability to mock Indigenous peoples.
In 2026, it publishes Steven Lowy declaring: “Australia needs its cultural, educational, business and civic leaders to actively model and defend pluralistic values. We need leaders in schools to explain why diversity makes us stronger. We need them in boardrooms to demonstrate that inclusion is not a compliance exercise but a competitive advantage. We need them in community centres to build bridges between groups that fear each other.”
Funnily enough, that laudable new enthusiasm for pluralism and inclusion doesn’t extend to the people of Gaza, where, as both Amnesty International and B’Tselem have recently documented, the genocide continues. 
Someone should draw a cartoon about it.

Back at the lizard Oz, the reptiles continued their weird double standards, though this reptile travelling as Steve Jackson only managed a two minute read on the affair  ...



The header: Cartoonist Cathy Wilcox lashes out after Nine’s half-hearted apology; No one appears to be happy after Nine apologised for publishing a now-notorious illustration about the push for a royal commission into anti-Semitism … not least the cartoonist who drew it.

The caption for the jihad victim: Cartoonist Cathy Wilcox.

The reptiles were keen to push the fuss, thereby doing down both Wilcox and the pathetic Nine rags ...

Nine’s half-hearted apology for publishing Cathy Wilcox’s “divisive” cartoon about the royal commission into anti-Semitism has done little to appease outraged readers on either side of the furore.
Both Wilcox’s critics and defenders have sledged the mastheads after they belatedly acknowledged the distress and hurt the image had caused “many in the community” – with even the illustrator herself taking a veiled swipe at her editors.
The now notorious cartoon, which portrayed those pushing for an inquiry into rising anti-­Semitism following the atrocity as being secretly manipulated by ­Coalition figures and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, ­attracted an immediate backlash after it was printed in The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age last Wednesday.
The image’s detractors accused it of “trivialising mass murder” in the wake of the Bondi Beach terror attack and playing on age-old anti-Semitic tropes.

Amazingly, Stevo used an X'er, cohabiting with Grok, promoter of falsehoods and nude deep fakes, to reproduce the cartoon ...Bondi Beach massacre survivor Arsen Ostrovsky responds to Wilcox's controversial cartoon.




Hang on, hang on, if it's so disturbing and offensive, why keep reproducing and circulating it? 

If it's an "unadulterated form of Jew-hatred" why keep airing it, especially on a cesspit forum notorious for giving space to anti-Semitism, owned by a man notoriously not afraid to give the Nazi salute?

Who knows, but Wilcox got in a couple of good lines, a nice couple of licks...

Nine refused to comment on the ensuing uproar for five days – neither defending the cartoon nor apologising for it – before doing both on Sunday afternoon in an editorial headlined: “Wilcox cartoon was divisive – and we apologise for the hurt it has caused.”
While offering the papers’ sincere apologies to those offended, the editorial also went to great lengths to justify the tabloids’ decision to publish the picture in the first place, insisting “many of our readers found the cartoon thought-provoking”.
“It is undeniable, however, that many others in the community, particularly Jews, were deeply hurt and offended by it,” the editorial continued. “We have heard their distress and for this pain, we sincerely apologise.”
Following the admission, the tabloids’ went on to defend their cartoonists’ right to “draw the world as they see it”; both mastheads continue to host the illustration on their news sites.
Critics were underwhelmed, claiming the apology lacked sincerity and shifted blame to those who felt the illustration was irresponsible and inflammatory.
Wilcox and her defenders were equally unimpressed and took to social media to express outrage at the tabloids’ contrition within hours of the apology going live.
One social media user, “Rosco The Grouch”, who claims to be a retired secondary school teacher, labelled the apology “Simpering. Sycophantic. Blather” before adding: “So much for the once great SMH. Maybe (Cathy Wilcox) ought to consider joining a paper that has some integrity.”
Somewhat pointedly, Wilcox responded: “Do you know of any?”
The award-winning cartoonist also said she might start sharing some of the abusive feedback she had received about her work.
“When this blows over, I might have to share some of the emails I’ve received … which really make me wonder why I am the one ­accused of hatred,” she wrote. “There is deep unresolved trauma being spewed by some people and we cannot consent to living according to their warped reality.”
And they weren’t the only ones she was keen to have a crack at. Sky News Australia later reported Wilcox sent them “an abusive email” after they sought her thoughts about Nine’s apology.

Sadly, the pond doesn't know any mainstream rags worthy of any other name than rag, and as for Sky Noise down under ... 'cesspit' seems way too kind, given that cesspits have a useful function.

Crikey also had a nice piece on the death of the Adelaide Writers Week by Daanyal Saeed ...

As well as noting the departure of the former NZ PMand the chair, Saeed had this to say ...

...Whiting said in a statement on LinkedIn that “recent decisions were bound by certain undertakings and my resignation enables the Adelaide Festival, as an organisation, to refresh its leadership and its approach to these circumstances”.
Legal representatives for Abdel-Fattah sent a letter to Whiting on January 11 requesting clarification in relation to the “past statements” referred to in the board’s public statement on the matter, which left open the possibility of future litigation.

It so happens that the pond had the first page of that letter to hand ...




Sorry for the interruption ...

The board is yet to make a public comment in respect of the walkouts, and neither the Adelaide Festival nor Adler responded to inquiries from Crikey last week. Amid circling rumours that Writers’ Week would be cancelled altogether, and speculation over how the board can now reach a quorum to make any further decisions, on Monday afternoon, Adelaide Festival Corporation executive director Julian Hobba released a statement calling the circumstances of the boycott “complex and unprecedented”. 
“Following the Adelaide Festival board’s decision on Thursday, 8 January and the significant community response, Adelaide Writers’ Week and Adelaide Festival are navigating a complex and unprecedented moment and will share further updates as soon as we are able,” the statement read. 
CAA Speakers, the firm responsible for Ardern’s speaking engagements, was contacted for comment but did not respond in time for publication.
The front page of the Adelaide-based News Corp tabloid paper The Advertiser on January 12 was dedicated to the controversy, titled “JEEZ LOUISE” with a full-page photograph of Adler, who led the Adelaide Festival last year to record attendances.

Ah the reptiles, always in the thick of it, always stirring up trouble ...




Talk about the suffering of a parochial one rag town ...

By sublime coincidence ... a demonstration that the 'Tiser has all the imagination of a coffee shop ...




Then came a count of the numbers of the tape, possibly already outdate ...

Artists and sponsors have continued to pull out of the festival as a result of the decision. InDaily reports that day two of Tryp, the contemporary music program, has been abandoned, with every artist having pulled out and a festival drinks sponsor, Mischief Brewing, also dropping out.
InDaily reports that Adelaide Festival made $472,000 last year, up from a loss of $825,000 in 2024. According to the festival’s own impact report, it had a $47.1 million net impact on gross state product last year, with 365,402 total attendees.
The list of Writers’ Week boycotting participants has grown to around 90, with the festival’s website stating (before its lineup page was taken down as a result of the boycott) that it was hosting 123 speakers. 

What could the reptiles do, but shoot down Louise more, by bringing in reprehensible, disreputable Morry, an ongoing threat to his own brand? C.f. The Sunday Paper... which definitely has an axe to grind ...



And so on, and meanwhile, the lizard Oz hit piece ran under the header Culture, as if the reptiles didn't understand that what they had was a Kultur and it ran on for a goodly, bigly five minutes, or so the reptiles clocked it ...



The header: Publisher Morry Schwartz accuses director of ‘wounding’ Adelaide Writers Week, Influential publisher Morry Schwartz has accused Adelaide Writers Week director Louise Adler of deliberately ‘wounding’ it by programming a controversial Palestinian writer as Adelaide Festival board faces collapse with fresh resignations.
The author: Tim Douglas
The ticking clock: January 13, 2026 - 6:37AM
The caption for the collage: Adelaide Writers’ Week boss Louise Adler; publisher Morry Schwartz; academic Randa Abdel-Fattah.

Morry, it should go without saying, is a biased, paranoid witness, exactly the kind the reptiles would turn to ...especially as he sought them out by way of letter to carry on his personal jihad ...

Influential publisher Morry Schwartz says Adelaide Writers Week boss Louise Adler has intentionally “wounded” the literary festival, claiming the director knew programming controversial Palestinian writer Randa Abdel-Fattah would imperil the event’s future.
In a letter to The Australian, Mr Schwartz claimed Ms Adler’s “obsessive cause” was to blame for the fallout at AWW, where more than 70 authors reportedly had publicly withdrawn and four Adelaide Festival board members, including chair Tracey Whiting, had resigned.
“It’s clearly Louise Adler who has wounded Adelaide Writers’ Week – not the board, nor the SA government,” wrote Mr Schwartz, owner of Schwartz Media, publisher of Black Inc Books, The Saturday Paper and Quarterly Essay.
“Adler well knew that including Dr Randa Abdel-Fattah (‘if you are a Zionist you have no claim or right to cultural safety’) would endanger the institution.
“But it mattered nil to her – her obsessive cause is more important to her than our precious 66-year-old writers’ festival.”
Three years ago, Mr Schwartz called for Ms Adler to resign from her position, but for the writers at her festival to remain.

Naturally the preening Morry scored a still showing him posed in his finery, Leading Melbourne publisher Morry Schwartz. Aaron Francis/The Australian



Zionist Morry was given plenty of room to vent his spleen, as the cliché goes ...

“Back then she programmed eight pro-Palestinian activists, with zero alternative voices. One, Mohammed El-Kurd, compared Israel to Nazis and defended someone who tweeted that she wanted ‘to kill every motherf..king Zionist’, ‘curse the Jews’, and who supported Hamas. Others weren’t far behind.”
Ms Adler and the Adelaide Festival were contacted for comment. The decision by the festival board, which oversees Adelaide Writers’ Week, to withdraw Dr Abdel-Fattah’s invitation over historic comments about Israel was made without Ms Adler’s input. She is yet to speak publicly.

The desire to erase Palestinians here is almost as strong as the desire for ethnic cleansing currently promoted by the government of Israel.

Eventually the reptiles had to get over Morry and report on the disaster that the reptile jihad and Zionists had produced ...

The decision came after a review into programming at the Adelaide event in the wake of the Bondi terror attack that killed 15 people. While the board made clear Dr Abdel-Fattah in no way was associated with the Bondi attack, it said it would not be “culturally appropriate” to keep her on the program. The decision sparked the mass boycott by authors including headliners Orange prize winner Zadie Smith, Pulitzer Prize winner Percival Everett, Australian literary doyenne Helen Garner, Miles Franklin winner Melissa Lucashenko and ABIA prize winner Trent Dalton. Former New Zealand prime minister Jacinda Ardern was confirmed on Monday evening to also have cancelled her festival appearance with the ABC’s Sarah Ferguson on March 3. The Australia Institute think tank pulled its funding from the event, and on Instagram publisher Hardie Grant publicly condemned the decision to disinvite Dr Abdel-Fattah, saying: “We cannot support an environment where festivals are destroyed when considered programming decisions are overridden by politicians and boards.”

There came a snap of the victim Randa Abdel-Fattah. Picture Instagram/@randaafattah



The reptiles then attempted a little "straight" reporting, though it doesn't really fit their kultur ...

The prestigious festival’s future remains in jeopardy, in the wake of four of the eight Adelaide Festival board members, including Ms Whiting, having resigned. Journalist and broadcaster Daniela Ritorto, businesswoman Donny Walford and lawyer Nick Linke tendered their resignations at the weekend. Ms Whiting said in a statement: “Recent decisions were bound by certain undertakings and my resignation enables the Adelaide Festival, as an organisation, to refresh its leadership and its approach to these circumstances.”
The board now finds itself in a critical situation, with just three remaining members – Adelaide councillor Mary Couros, former Labor SA government minister Leesa Chesser and Adelaide Airport managing director Brenton Cox – along with government observer Jennifer Fuller. A festival spokeperson was contacted to clarify the board’s ability to operate with respect to guidelines under the Adelaide Festival Corporation Act 1998. The Act stipulates at least two women and two men must comprise the board.
The news came as an updated letter demanding Dr Abdel-Fattah’s reinstatement, signed by six other former Adelaide Festival directors, was sent to the remaining board members.
Robyn Archer, Peter Sellars, Ruth Mackenzie, Stephen Page, Paul Grabowsky and Penny Chapman added their names to the open letter. They join other big names of the Australian arts sector, who have run the country’s most prestigious cultural jamboree at various stages since 1975, including Neil Armfield, Rob Brookman, Jo Dyer, Peter Goldsworthy, Nicholas Heyward, Kath M. Mainland, Ian Scobie, David Sefton, Jim Sharman and Mary Vallentine.
The letter claimed the board had made a “grave mistake” and had brought the festival into disrepute.
“There is one remedy for the justified public outcry at this egregious incursion on free speech and the damaging series of withdrawals it has caused,” it read. “We call upon the board to reinstate Dr Abdel-Fattah’s invitation to the 2026 Adelaide Writers’ Week immediately. An about-face may be embarrassing but it is both the right thing to do and will cauterise the growing damage to this much loved and internationally significant South Australian cultural institution.

The one rebel to score a snap was English novelist Zadie Smith. Photo by Brian Dowling/Getty Images



Then it was on to the wrap up, with the reptiles doing their best to tilt the reporting in a way that favoured the banning ...

“Wickedness thrives in darkness and prejudice thrives in ignorance born of silence. The open  discussion of ideas, beliefs, facts and opinion is ultimately the pathway to community cohesion. Silencing and censorship are not.”
Arts Minister Tony Burke on Monday said the government had no involvement in the decisions made by festivals, stepping in to answer a question for Anthony Albanese at a press conference when the Prime Minister was asked if Dr Abdel-Fattah should be reinstated.
“With respect to any writers’ festival, we leave those decisions to the festivals themselves,” Mr Burke said. “We don’t tell festivals who they should put on and who they shouldn’t.”
Greens acting leader Sarah Hanson-Young said Adelaide’s famously strong arts and festival brands were “in tatters”. She called for Dr Abdel-Fattah to be reinstated, claiming South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas had made “an enormous mess” pressuring the board to cancel the writer.
“The Adelaide Festival is now on the brink of collapse and the government needs to act urgently,” Senator Hanson-Young said.
Tasmanian Liberal senator Jonathon Duniam, however, said while he accepted there were freedom of speech concerns, context was key.
“We have just seen the culmination of two years of horrible (anti-Semitic) behaviour, and that resulted in the worst terrorist act on our soil in history, in Bondi, and so we do need to have a degree of sensitivity,” he said. “I would urge those members of the creative community, the other authors who are saying they don’t want to participate in this event because someone has been asked to not participate, think again. There is a space for creative thought. There is a space for freedom of expression. But given some of the things that the individual in question has said in the past, it is definitely the right decision.”
Dr Abdel-Fattah said on Monday “attempts to police speech” were being met with resistance from those in the arts sector.
“No amount of retrospective back-pedalling about vague ‘prior statements’ can obscure the fact that I was formally disinvited on the grounds that my Palestinian identity would act as an emotional provocation,” she told Australian Associated Press.
“It is hard to view the timing as accidental rather than a calculated decision to make the announcement on that particular day and to reinforce the link between me and the Bondi atrocity.”
Dr Abdel-Fattah’s lawyers have sent a letter to the festival board, asking it to identify the exact “past statements” it cited in its announcement that it would cancel the author’s appearance. The legal team has demanded a response by January 14.
Adelaide Festival Corporation executive director Julian Hobba said in a statement on Monday that the “complex” situation was being “navigated”.
“Following the Adelaide Festival board’s decision on Thursday, 8 January and the significant community response, Adelaide Writers’ Week and Adelaide Festival are navigating a complex and unprecedented moment and will share further updates as soon as we are able,” he said.

Discredit where discredit is due ...

ADDITIONAL REPORTING
ELIZABETH PIKE AND SARAH ISON

P.S. Another notch on the hive mind press's and Morry's gun, Louise Adler resigns...

Sadly,  Australia can't in any way match King Donald's current deeds ...but turning a mass terrorist murder into an ongoing political campaign seems to match the King's spirit ...




Meanwhile, for a closer, the lizard Oz editorialist echoed the current concern the King Donald administration has for breeding ...

Pro-natalism is big in King Donald land, but only of a certain kind and colour...

Just like Adolf ...

Naturally the lizard Oz editorialist heard the call ...



Did you see that closing line?

The reality is we need both, lest we end up like Canada, where domestic fertility is 1.25 and immigration is all that is keeping the country going. And that would not be the Australian way.

Immigration isn't the Australian way?

That's kinda funny. The pond thought most Australians came by way of immigration, but the pond understands ... Aussie blut is the way forward, and we must keep breeding for the Führer. Get to work, vulgar youff ...

And so to the good news in 'toon land. 

The immortal Rowe is back, and so the pond can take it easy at close of Wasserglas play ...




And old reliables like Doonesbury stay in touch with the times ...




Monday, January 12, 2026

He's baaack ... and so is Killer of the IPA ... the bromancer lives, and after many preliminaries, the pond will get to that dance ...

 

Gutless. Cowardly. Shameful. A weak-kneed flip-flopping bout of whining both siderism.

But typical, providing yet another reason not a drop of the pond's money goes to the Nine rags ...

Wilcox cartoon was divisive – and we apologise for the hurt it has caused (*archive link)
The Herald's View
Updated January 11, 2026 — 3.55pm first published at 3.50pm

Even more pathetic was the timid way they dropped it late on a Sunday arvo ...

Inter alia ...



When the pond checked, despite the mealy-mouthed carryon and craven cavorting, the 'toon was still to be found (in 'cartoons of the week', not in 'best of Wilcox'), but the cartoon section seemed to be in a paralysed stasis.

Naturally the reptiles were still on the case. 

When they sense weakness, they go for the throat and hang on like a pitbull ... and offer up outrageous slurs:

Amazingly, for a cartoon one step short of Adolf, or perhaps Martin Luther, the reptiles managed to reproduce it yet again.

Meanwhile,  the Writers' Festival fuss continued, with SBS on the weekend reporting that board members are now dropping out like hippies on Haight-Ashbury. The chair led the way.

A feeble counter-attack was mounted with reports that Randa Abdel-Fattah joined a cabal to get Thomas Friedman banned the previous year, but the obvious retort is that any Festival that would have Friedman as a speaker must be subject to the Groucho rule - that's not a club anyone should want to belong to.

The reptiles were on that case, with Nick on hand to conflate and confuse...

Writer’s ban about double standards, not free speech
Randa Abdel Fattah’s Writers’ Week punting is an overdue reckoning for cultural hypocrisy. (that's an intermittent archive link)
By Nick Dyrenfurth

Ain't he a wonder. Dropping a writer for political reasons or nervous nelly Adelaide great aunt sensitivities ain't about free speech? George would be proud.

The lizard Oz editorialist also chipped in with a profoundly ironical headline, what with the lizard Oz being a font of hate and endless jihads ...

Cultural left is conspicuous in its tolerance for hate
The stampede by authors to support anti-Israel author Randa Abdel-Fattah shows the extent to which toxic anti-Semitic ideology has been allowed to seep into our institutions.

This from a rag that has been spreading its special brand of poison for decades.

How weird did it get?

EXCLUSIVE
Put immigration policy on royal commission’s agenda: Lowy
Business leader Steven Lowy says freedom and tolerance in Australia is being abused and bigger cultural change is needed.
By Richard Ferguson and Sarah Ison

That was just a seafood extender EXCLUSIVE based on this offering ...

Bondi Beach attack was our wake-up call to act
The Royal Commission into anti-Semitism is welcome, but it cannot be seen as the end of the matter.
By Steven Lowy

If we're going to go down the 'ban Islamics like King Donald wanted to' route, then surely the RC must look into the hate speech emanating from News Corp. This can't be seen as the end of the matter. 

Surely the RC must look to expropriating the assets of a foreign owned disrupter of community harmony?

But chinks are beginning to appear in the reptiles' latest jihad.

The reptiles seem to have begun to realise that there were other things happening in the world, and that a monomaniacal obsession with turning a terrorist slaughter into a political wedge might be a turn off. So they turned on ...



Yes, big splashes and three whole stories, and luckily there's no need to go there, because anyone interested can find the details outside the hive mind.

Speaking of the real world, the pond noticed this yarn in Wired ... it's possibly not the time for the reptiles to indulge in their usual bout of climate science denialism, but just in case ...

The Oceans Just Keep Getting Hotter
For the eighth year in a row, the world’s oceans absorbed a record-breaking amount of heat in 2025. It was equivalent to the energy it would take to boil 2 billion Olympic swimming pools. (here's an intermittent archive link for anyone who might hit a wall).

The opening, a teaser trailer:

Since 2018, a group of researchers from around the world have crunched the numbers on how much heat the world’s oceans are absorbing each year. In 2025, their measurements broke records once again, making this the eighth year in a row that the world’s oceans have absorbed more heat than the years before.
The study, which was published Friday in the journal Advances in Atmospheric Science, found that the world’s oceans absorbed an additional 23 zettajoules’ worth of heat in 2025, the most in any year since modern measurements began in the 1960s. That’s significantly higher than the 16 additional zettajoules they absorbed in 2024. The research comes from a team of more than 50 scientists across the United States, Europe, and China.
A joule is a common way to measure energy. A single joule is a relatively small unit of measurement—it’s about enough to power a tiny lightbulb for a second, or slightly heat a gram of water. But a zettajoule is one sextillion joules; numerically, the 23 zettajoules the oceans absorbed this year can be written out as 23,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.
John Abraham, a professor of thermal science at the University of St. Thomas and one of the authors on the paper, says that he sometimes has trouble putting this number into contexts laypeople understand. Abraham offers up a couple options. His favorite is comparing the energy stored in the ocean to the energy of atomic bombs: The 2025 warming, he says, is the energetic equivalent to 12 Hiroshima bombs exploding in the ocean. (Some other calculations he’s done include equating this number to the energy it would take to boil 2 billion Olympic swimming pools, or more than 200 times the electrical use of everyone on the planet.)
“Last year was a bonkers, crazy warming year—that's the technical term,” Abraham joked to me. “The peer-reviewed scientific term is ‘bonkers’.”
The world’s oceans are its largest heat sink, absorbing more than 90 percent of the excess warming that is trapped in the atmosphere. While some of the excess heat warms the ocean’s surface, it also slowly travels further down into deeper parts of the ocean, aided by circulation and currents.
Global temperature calculations—like the ones used to determine the hottest years on record—usually only capture measurements taken at the ocean’s surface. (The study finds that overall sea surface temperatures in 2025 were slightly lower than they were in 2024, which is on record as the hottest year since modern records began. Some meteorological phenomena, like El Niño events, can also raise sea surface temperatures in certain regions, which can cause the overall ocean to absorb slightly less heat in a given year. This helps to explain why there was such a big jump in added ocean heat content between 2025, which developed a weak La Niña at the end of the year, and 2024, which came at the end of a strong El Niño year.) While sea surface temperatures have risen since the industrial revolution, thanks to our use of fossil fuels, these measurements don’t provide a full picture of how climate change is affecting the oceans.
“If the whole world was covered by a shallow ocean that was only a couple feet deep, it would warm up more or less at the same speed as the land,” says Zeke Hausfather, a research scientist at Berkeley Earth and a coauthor of the study. “But because so much of that heat is going down in the deep ocean, we see generally slower warming of sea surface temperatures [than those on land].”

And so on, and at last the pond can speak science ... bonkers ... and there must be a 'toon for all that ...



...and speaking of bonkers, there was another astonishing disruption to the jihad.

At the top of the lizard Oz the jihad took a new turn. There was a new topic, a new target ...



And best of all?

He's baaack ...

Little Greggie with his axe, ready to pound away at assorted doors.

Oh how the pond has waited, oh how correspondents have yearned ...

It's only a three minute read, so the reptiles said, but the pond fell on it like a famished hound that hadn't had a feed in a month:



The header: Ayatollah beware, your brutal Islamo-Stalinst regime is under its greatest threat since 1979, The Iranian regime is still in overall control and becoming vastly more brutal in its crackdown. But neither its survival, nor its collapse, is sure. These demonstrations are unlike anything in post-revolutionary Iran.

The caption: An image showing protesters once again taking to the streets of Tehran despite an intensifying crackdown as the Islamic Republic remains cut off from the rest of the world. (UGC via AP)

Now it's true that the bromancer is in jihad mode, but when is he not?

It's also true that the only apparent difference these days between the mad Mullahs and King Donald is scale.

While King Donald's minions casually murder US citizens in the streets, the mad Mullahs really know how to do it, and indulge in senseless slaughter.

That said, forget King Donald's inclination to authoritarianism.

The bromancer is a specialist in selective rage and singular vision, so he had at the mad Mullahs ...

The dark and murderous vision of theocratic blackness and hatred of the West, and of Jews, which lies at the heart of the Iranian revolution, is under greater threat today than at any time since 1979.
The ayatollahs’ Islamo-Stalinist regime is being challenged by the people who know it best, the Iranian people. Iran is experiencing its biggest anti-government demonstrations since the 1979 overthrow of the shah.
As recently as a week ago, US intelligence assessed that the demonstrations lacked the strength to offer an existential threat to the rule of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the whole theocratic regime. Now, that analysis is much less certain. The protests have been running intensely for two weeks. Tehran has shut down the internet within Iran. When it did this in 2019, it provided cover for widespread massacres of protesters.
Something similar is under way now. Iranian hospitals are overwhelmed trying to treat shot and beaten protesters. Hundreds are dead, thousands imprisoned. Initially, there was some effort by Iranian government leaders to address economic distress and promise mild reform. That tone has now gone entirely. The government now calls protesters “enemies of God”, which means they face the death penalty. Nonetheless, images still emerge of government buildings in flames and huge demonstrations – in at least one case of a million people – in Iranian cities.

The reptiles flung in an AV distraction, Unrest across Iran is escalating as the regime cracks down on government protests amid a major internet blackout.



The bromancer carried on, and who would defend the mad Mullahs against his foam-flecked rage?

The ayatollahs have faced waves of huge demonstrations before. Dictatorships typically fall in one of four circumstances – when they begin to liberalise, when the leadership becomes divided and some side with the protesters, when a government loses administrative capability or when an outside power decisively assists the revolutionaries.
The Iranian regime is still in overall control and becoming vastly more brutal in its crackdown. But neither its survival, nor its collapse, is sure. The next weeks are critical. These demonstrations are unlike anything in post-revolutionary Iran.
First, they are at their foundation economic, initially led by shopkeepers, a class slow to anger but dreadfully dangerous to any regime. Iran, inheritor of the great Persian civilisation, has a sophisticated urban class that hates the regime. But that class alone can never prevail. These demonstrations include the working class, unionists, farmers, villagers.
Secondly, it’s clear now to all Iranians except for devoted theocrats and the ruling class itself that the Islamic revolution has brought nothing but misery and despair. The people hate the regime and hate the way they are forced to live.

Then came another visual interruption: This image from a video released on January 9, 2026, by Iranian state television shows a man holding a device to document burning vehicles during a night of mass protests in Zanjan, Iran. (Iranian state TV via AP)



The bromancer saw King Donald as an avenging angel, and never mind the vengeance doled out by his ICE minions:

Third, the regime is weaker than it’s been for decades. The relentless pursuit of the nuclear program, designed to provide an Iranian bomb, has delivered nothing but sanctions and the devastating Israeli and US military strikes. As with Venezuela, vaunted air defences proved worthless.
The Iranian leaders made a terrible blunder, perhaps on a par with Nicolas Maduro’s miscalculations in Venezuela, in refusing US President Donald Trump’s offer of economic engagement in exchange for abandoning the nuclear program. The Iranian people yearned for such a deal, for normality and prosperity.
Importantly, all those analysts, who represented a strong consensus among the international relations class, who argued that Israeli and US strikes would only unify Iranian sentiment behind the government and against the West have been proven completely wrong. Far from experiencing a patriotic surge of support, the Iranian government has never been more comprehensively loathed by its own people, who daily risk death in trying to change the regime.

There came a final visual distraction, This image, taken from anonymous user-generated video via AFPTV on January 10, 2026 shows a protester pulling down the Iranian flag from the balcony of Iran's embassy in central London. (Photo by Handout / various sources / AFP)



A hint of doubt crept into the narrative:

Trump has threatened to strike Iran if it kills its people in large numbers, as it has done in previous crackdowns. It’s hard to see how this would lead directly to regime change. But it’s a remarkable intervention. The US President is backing demonstrators seeking freedom and, as far as we can tell, the demonstrators are glad of any support they can get.

Yes, they can die in the streets, while King Donald makes vague threats and useless promises.

And then came an astonishing rewriting of history, as only the bromancer can do ...

Then there’s the role of the exiled crown prince, Reza Pahlavi, son of the last shah to rule Iran. The shah lost power not because he was too brutal, though his rule was brutal, but because he began to liberalise and provided space for the organised Islamist forces to lead a broad social movement, which they betrayed as soon as they seized power.

The Shah a liberal? C.f. the wiki on the subject...

The revolution was fueled by widespread perceptions of the Shah's regime as corrupt, repressive, and overly reliant on foreign powers, particularly the United States and the United Kingdom. Many Iranians felt that the Shah's government was not acting in the best interests of the Iranian people and that it was too closely aligned with Western interests, especially at the expense of Iranian sovereignty and cultural identity.

There were many other reasons - see the wiki for a detailed breakdown of events - but the result was most unfortunate, a classic case of jumping from the frypan into the fire, of the kind that King Donald supporters have done as they FAFO'd.

The bromancer couldn't resist one final illiberal flourish, worthy of a Khomeini:

One factor in the regime’s favour this time is that it’s unclear that the protesters, courageous as they are, have coherent leadership. But protesters have responded in surprising numbers to Pahlavi’s calls to take specific actions on specific days, and have taken to displaying the old lion-and-sun flag of pre-revolutionary Iran. The enduring appeal of monarchy in the Islamic world asserts itself once more.
The Iranian government characterises the vast social movement it’s confronting as an Israeli conspiracy, like Cathy Wilcox cartoon writ large.
Brave Iranians are daily dying for freedom. Naturally there are no left-wing demonstrations in their support in the West. But they do have Trump.

He had to drag Wilcox into the affair? 

And he dismissed King Donald with an imperious wave of the bromancer hand?

And the world still cast in that black and white, leftists bad, King Donald if not good, then somewhat endearing mind set?

Oh he'll never change, he'll always be the same old lover of the onion muncher ...and with any luck he'll help steer the lizard Oz into new jihads and provide ways for the pond to avoid the current RC jihad.

As for King Donald, luckily Killer of the IPA was on hand to talk about the monster in affectionate terms.

Sure it's day old stuff, but when has Killer of the IPA ever tasted stale and soggy?



The header: Trump’s ‘shock and awe’ in Venezuela reveals US naked self-interest; Trump’s brazen Venezuelan intervention has finally buried the so-called rules-based global order that never truly existed, leaving Australia in an awkward position.

The caption for the king in sociopathic smirk mode: President Donald Trump. ‘For all Trump’s talk of peace and the presumed isolationist bent of his administration, the President already has bombed at least a half-dozen countries.’ Picture: AP

Killer spoke in favour of King Donald the way a fervent Stephen Miller might manage. 

It was realpolitik all the way.

Henry Kissinger would have been proud. 

Perhaps not since Theodore Roosevelt has a US president been so blunt about the real reason America intervenes abroad: naked self-interest.
Members of Donald Trump’s MAGA base shouldn’t fear their children are about to die in the jungles of Venezuela in another doomed attempt to export democracy. They should admire their President’s candour.
Trump made no serious effort to cloak the seizure of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and Maduro’s wife, Cilia Flores, last week in the familiar language of freedom, humanitarianism or international law.
Instead, Trump spoke openly about monopolising Venezuela’s vast oil reserves for American benefit – a clarity that finally buried the so-called rules-based global order, which never truly existed anyway.
It’s hard to imagine even those diehard spruikers of the fictitious global order, Defence Minister Richard Marles and Foreign Minister Penny Wong, uttering the phrase for years now that the ultimate guarantor of our security didn’t even attempt to cloak its brazen intervention as anything other than America First.
The outrage was understandable among the UN set – many thousands of high-paying bureaucratic jobs hinge on at least lip service to international law – but not the surprise.
For all Trump’s talk of peace and the presumed isolationist bent of his administration, the President already has bombed at least a half-dozen countries – including Somalia, Nigeria and Iran – not even one year into his second term. That’s far more than Joe Biden did in his entire four years in office.
The Venezuela move was “shock and awe”, Trump-style: no boots on the ground, no rhetoric about democracy or the enforcement of international law.
Trump was putting his administration’s freshly minted national security strategy into action.
“We will deny non-Hemispheric competitors the ability to position forces or other threatening capabilities, or to own or control strategically vital assets, in our Hemisphere,” the 33-page security strategy document states, describing what it calls the “Trump corollary” to the well-known Monroe Doctrine.

Cue an AV distraction featuring an image likely to stir a reptile almost as much as a lump of coal:  U.S. President Donald Trump began a meeting to discuss Venezuela with executives from some of the world's largest oil companies at the White House on Friday, saying he wants them to invest $100 billion in the country to vastly expand its production. Alex Cohen has more.



Killer saw it all as a glorious, unambiguous triumph:

It remains an unambiguous victory for Trump, who has shaken off the TACO (Trump Always Chickens Out) accusation, and the US, which demonstrated its unrivalled ability to project power only months after a brilliant high-stakes bombing operation in Iran.
Whatever cover Trump’s “illegal” action supposedly gives Russia and China to behave similarly is dwarfed by their military and economic humiliation.
Energy-poor China, which must import about three-quarters of its oil, had seen Venezuela as a reliable supplier. Meanwhile Trump has deprived Moscow of billions of dollars’ worth of future arms sales to Caracas and highlighted the worthlessness of a freshly inked strategic partnership that Maduro signed with Russia last year.

But then came the downers, with several very big billy goat butts:

But the tactical success of Trump’s intervention victory could easily become a long-term strategic loss, not to mention the ongoing awkwardness for Australia in particular.
Venezuela’s oil reserves, which oil-exporting America doesn’t even need, are no El Dorado, costing more to extract per barrel than the prevailing oil price, owing to their poor quality and the difficulties of pumping them.
Top US oil executives, predictably, told Trump at the White House last week they wouldn’t invest the $US100bn ($149bn) required to update Venezuela’s dilapidated oil infrastructure without investment certainty, which is impossible without US boots on the ground – something Trump is unlikely to countenance.
The Venezuelan military, not to mention the families of the 80-odd Venezuelans killed in the US operation, aren’t likely to warm to US orders in coming months.
Maduro’s regime, which has brazenly stolen elections and presided over one of the biggest collapses in national income of any nation in modern history, is still in control.
New interim president Delcy Rodriguez, a veteran left-wing revolutionary, has a track record of publicly hating the US. Trump’s disregard for opposition leader Maria Corina Machado, who symbolically offered her Nobel Peace Prize to the US President, won’t please pro-democracy forces within Venezuela either; they’ve realised their initial dancing in the street at the prospect of a new democratic government was rather premature.

Hah, hapless peasants, how Killer chortled with glee, as the reptiles interrupted with another AV distraction (is Killer that boring he always needs some relief?): Two leading members of Venezuela's political opposition were freed in a prisoner release on Thursday (January 8), according to local rights group Foro Penal and videos shared by Venezuelan journalists.



Downsides hurled into the distance, Killer carried on with his Millerisms:

Even if the US could miraculously lift Venezuelan output from roughly one million barrels a day to the three million it once produced in the 1970s, OPEC simply would adjust supply to neutralise any meaningful price impact. The US doesn’t even need the oil.
What Trump has achieved is a tactical victory, not a strategic one – and potentially a long-term loss. His audacious act will harden opposition to the US, which is no longer as relatively powerful as it once was in the immediate aftermath of the World War II era.
The spectacle of the US, home to only 4 per cent of the world’s population, dragging a foreign leader of a mid-sized nation before a domestic US court, whatever the accuracy of the charges, won’t sit well with many actual and future heads of state.
Russia and China, not to mention other South American nations, newly fearful of US power, will have strong incentives to redouble their defence spending and in particular their counter-espionage operations.
Trump publicly slammed US defence contractor Raytheon last week, but that industry is the only clear winner long term.
Almost two years ago I wrote an unpopular column in these pages arguing “there is not, and never was, a rules-based global order, despite our politicians’ fondness for evoking it”. I hate to gloat but we now have yet more evidence.
That’s cold comfort, though, given Australia’s near total reliance on the US – a nation most of our biggest trading partners and neighbours must privately if not publicly loathe even more – for our defence.
Adam Creighton is chief economist at the Institute of Public Affairs.

What odd discordant notes on the back palate.

Cold comfort aside, is there any difference between Killer and his heroes?

“We live in a world in which you can talk all you want about international niceties and everything else, but we live in a world, in the real world, Jake, that is governed by strength, that is governed by force, that is governed by power,” Mr. Miller told Jake Tapper of CNN on Monday, during a combative appearance in which he was pressed on Mr. Trump’s long-held desire to control Greenland.
“These are the iron laws of the world since the beginning of time,” he said.

How Adolf would have been proud, and there's more for those with a taste for it at the both siderist NY Times (intermittent archive link):

Stephen Miller Offers a Strongman’s View of the World
President Trump’s trusted adviser is casting his hard-right gaze abroad, saying the world must be governed by “force.” 

Why is it that weedy types of the vampire Miller and Killer of the IPA kind are so devoted to the notion of brute power?

Did they suffer in childhood?



Roll on the taking of Greenland, and after that Canada (elbows up Canucks), with Killer of the IPA cheering from the sidelines; roll on Vlad the sociopath and his attempts to expand his repressive regime, with Killer of the IPA congratulating him on so much winning ...

For that matter, roll on mad Mullahs, with your repression just part of the iron laws that ruled the world since the beginning of time.

As for being an Xian, what the heck was that all about? Love, it seems, comes out of the barrel of a gun.

Watch out New Zealand, so many sheep make you a tempting target for Albo seeking a distraction from his woes ...

And so to finish with a few 'toons ...







Sunday, January 11, 2026

In which Polonius goes Wilcox, while the Angelic One and the Canavan caravan honour Queensland's Norwegian Blue pollie...

 

The pond has done its best to avoid the lizard Oz jihad, but this is the pond's Sunday meditation, and Polonius's prattle has led the way these last few years.

Sadly, inevitably he is now, in his prim, ponderous, clucking and tut-tutting way, all in on the jihad, and the pond had no way around it...

But at least the topic allows the pond to do a brief Tootle flashback. 

Remember this? The Australian defends 'insulting' Bill Leak cartoon



Oh how they loved freedom of expression back then, how devoted they were to it ... 




Oh they were all in on cartoonists' rights to push boundaries and exercise free speech and be as tasteless as they liked ...

Now please allow the pond to parse the Wilcox cartoon that's got her into hot water, at least in la la hive mind land and with rabid Zionists...



What's anti-Semitic about that? (There's a reason must of the rags have run the story with 'anti-Semitic' in scare quotes).

It slags off special interest groups with obvious reasons for calling for an RC, with shilling lawyers leading the way for obvious reasons. 

It mocks sporting types and Labor has beens and it defames dogs who don't want to mention the Gaza genocide and ethnic cleansing.

Below the astro-turfing it shows Chairman Rupert leading the way for a bunch of unsavoury characters interested in making political hay, marching to Benji's drum beat (and has be been drumming, or what?)

The 'toon studiously avoids any Jewish stereotype or meme, while mocking the notion of 'grass roots' in favour of jihadist astro-turfing.

No wonder special interest groups and lobbyists and unsightly rags of the lizard Oz jihad kind took a fence and the gate too, and yet there are good reasons to tread warily with a RC, as outlined by Michael Bradley in Crikey ... (sorry, paywall)



Okay, the pond has done as much preliminary sanitation spadework as might be needed.

Now for that Polonial prattle ...



The header: Three strikes? Nine’s papers march to the beat of leftist drum, Could Nine’s Sydney Morning Herald be heading for a hat-trick in reverse after it listed Cathy Wilcox’s cartoon titled ‘Grass roots’ in its “best cartoons” category.

The caption: The Cathy Wilcox cartoon that featured in the Nine newspapers and online.

The old routine, the usual slur: label something as being leftist and that's all that needs to be said.

And yet, it will be noted in Daanyal Saeed's timeline for Crikey (sorry paywall) that the Nine rags and in particular the AFR were front and centre of promoting calls for an RC:



And so on and note how the SMH and the AFR feature, while Saeed seems to studiously ignore mentioning by name the lizard Oz jihad.

Speaking of that jihad, on with Polonius:

Could Nine’s Sydney Morning Herald be heading for a hat-trick in reverse? On January 7 it listed Cathy Wilcox’s cartoon titled “Grass roots” in its “best cartoons” category. Arsen Ostrovsky, who was injured in the terrorist attack on the Jewish community celebrating Hanukkah at Sydney’s Bondi Beach on December 14, has described Wilcox’s work as an “unadulterated form of Jew hatred”.
In her artistic statement against a royal commission into the massacre, Wilcox listed those who are supporting a “Royal Commission Now!” movement. Standing on a box containing grass, they are depicted as lawyers, business people, open-letter writers, sports greats, Labor has-beens and, wait for it, “dogs”, with a canine holding a bone declaring “Don’t mention the war”. This is a reference to the Hamas-Israel conflict following Hamas’s brutal invasion of southern Israel on October 7, 2023 – an implied criticism of Israel.
This group is being held up by those who appear to be Rupert Murdoch, Jillian Segal, John Howard, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, Sussan Ley and David Littleproud. Marching behind with a drum sounding “boom, boom” is Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The message is clear: Australian lawyers, business people, open-letter writers, sporting greats and current and former politicians who support a royal commission are marching to the drum of the leader of the Jewish state of Israel – along with dogs.
To be fair, the SMH and The Age (which also carried the cartoon) have published letters critical of Wilcox’s cartoon. But it has not withdrawn the work.

And why should it? To be fair, there are arguments against an RC. 

Just to finish off that Bradley piece:




At this point, the reptiles slipped in a snap to make sure the hive mind knew who to blame, The controversial cartoon of Cathy Wilcox remains online.



Polonius carried on:

Late on January 7, commentator Mike Carlton, a vehement critic of Israel, posted on X: “It’ll be interesting to see … if the editors of the SMH and The Age back Cathy Wilcox and this cartoon; or will they turn to jelly beneath the howls of rage and the deluge of abusive emails from the Israel lobby?”
As far as I can determine, only one member of the group of six advocates of a royal commission is Jewish. But the leftist Carlton reckons that support for this cause is part of a conspiracy organised by what opponents of Israel call “the Israel lobby” or “the Jewish lobby”. No other religious or racial group in Australia is referred to by such a sneering “lobby” reference.
Last Thursday, News Corp’s tabloids carried an opinion poll by Melbourne-based research firm Fox & Hedgehog. It indicated that 54 per cent of Australians supported a royal commission with 19 per cent opposed and 27 per cent neutral or unsure. Jews comprise less than 0.5 per cent of the Australian population. Enough said.
At the time of writing, Wilcox’s cartoon remained on Nine’s website. Not so the article by Ahmed Ouf published in the SMH and The Age on December 23. Titled “I went to Bondi and hugged people who’d never spoken to a Muslim before”, Ouf wrote of his visit to Bondi Beach in the week beginning December 21. It is not clear how he knew whether the Jews he met at the murder site had ever spoken to a Muslim before. It would be difficult to live in Sydney or Melbourne without speaking to Muslims – or Christians, Buddhists, Hindus or nonbelievers.

The reptiles offered another visual distraction, Ahmed Ouf’s piece lacked judgment and was out of place. Picture: Tim Hunter



Polonius was now in full frothing and foaming mode and seemed to have forgotten the 'toon that so offended him, with new targets in his sights:

Ouf’s self-important piece lacked judgment and was out of place. After all, he was not the story and some of the victims had yet to be buried. Soon after publication, Nine retracted the piece “out of respect for the Jewish community” and apologised for “any distress its publication caused”.
No doubt “any distress” would have increased when it was revealed that Ouf had contested the seat of Blaxland in western Sydney, which is held by Labor frontbencher Jason Clare, at the May 2025 election – running as a Muslim Votes independent.
It also was revealed that Ouf supported the BDS (boycott, divestment, sanctions) movement aimed at debilitating Israel.
Ouf received 19 per cent of the primary vote and failed to defeat Clare, whose vote increased after the distribution of preferences. So did the vote for Labor frontbencher Tony Burke in Watson. In one of the few revelations in Niki Savva’s book Earthquake, Burke told the author he believed the Albanese government would be returned at the 2025 election but “was convinced he was about to lose his once-safe seat of Watson”.

And some reptiles will still try to tell the world that this isn't about politics and scoring a political edge, as opposed to being concerned for the victims, their families and friends and the wider community: Dr Jamal Rifi opposed the concept of a Muslim party. Picture: John Feder



It's just another chance to slag off the Islamics, and hope that the RC will help continue the relentless lizard Oz jihad, so that more subscriptions can be sold (do they even pretend to be selling tree killer editions these days?) ...

I never believed that this would occur and wrote on these pages on July 6, 2024, in support of Dr Jamal Rifi, who opposed the concept of a Muslim party since he believed that “Australia is well served by the different parties that exist”.
The evidence suggests there is widespread support in Australia for a royal commission into the Bondi terrorist attack. Ideally such an inquiry should date back to the explosion of anti-Semitism at the Sydney Opera House demonstration on October 9, 2023 – which took place before Israel initiated its defensive war against Hamas.
NSW Police maintained that chants of “Where’s the Jews?” were heard. Others, myself included, heard “Gas the Jews”. But there’s little difference in intent. No demonstration has heard chants of “Where’s the Muslims?” – or the Christians, or the Buddhists or the Hindus.
Presenting ABC Radio National Breakfast this week, Barbara Miller queried independent MPs Allegra Spender and David Pocock as to whether there should also be a royal commission into Islamophobia. Neither agreed. Spender, who at times has been a critic of Israel, made the hard point that “the Jewish community is a community that lives behind security fences in a way that no other part of our community does”.
Apparently Miller was not convinced. On January 8, she told opposition frontbencher Jonno Duniam a “fair number” of ABC RN Breakfast listeners “don’t think a royal commission is a good use of time and money”. Quelle surprise. It is the far left (including some RN listeners) along with radical Islam that is at the forefront of anti-Semitism. If Nine offers a column to Miller to present her leftist views on this issue it will complete its reverse hat-trick.

It's the far left at the front? And no mention at all of the far right?




There are none so blind as those who refuse to see their comrades in arms...

And so to the bonus, and to more pleasant times with the Angelic one...



The header: Vale, Ron Boswell, a true politician of the people; The former National Party senator was not every political and general know-all’s idea of a great man, but he was.

The caption: What you saw was what you got from Ron Boswell, delivering his valedictory speech in the Senate in 2014. Picture: Gary Ramage

Back in the day in Tamworth, the pond was always reminded that it was wrong to speak ill of the dead.

But those who said it routinely spoke ill of the dead - Stalin, Hitler, all that mob ...

The pond decided if you happened to chance on a d*ckhead (*google bot approved), you had every right to speak ill of them...

Take Ron. Someone, please take him. Okay, grim reaper, if you must.

He wasn't a d*ckhead on the grand Adolf scale, but he did his best to ruin the planet for everyone ...and he found a home in the AFR for it, peddling his folksie humbug cornball braces-wearing image ... (that's an archive link)..






And again (that's an archive link):



And so on and on and on, always keen to f*ck the planet (*google bot approved), and he was also a terrible bigot and hater. See this page for his thoughts on gay marriage.

Inter alia:

Madam Acting Deputy President Crossin, I understand we are debating your bill today. I find it a very serious debate. In fact, to me it is one of the most serious debates that we have ever had to face in this parliament, because it will fundamentally affect the way Australia reacts as a society. In my party, one of the basic philosophies is that the family is the basic unit of society and without a family you do not have a society. I cannot imagine a more severe attack on the family than undermining marriage. It is what the whole of our society is based on. It is what the whole of society over centuries—probably from the start of man—has been based on: a man and a woman getting together to procreate children and for those children to stay together under the care of a mother and a father. Without that, what do you have? What is society? That all stands before us. Fortunately, the Marriage Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2012 is not going to get through, but I have been around long enough to know that this is only the first attempt.
But what I want to say to you, Madam Acting Deputy President, is: yes, in the inner city suburbs of West End, South Brisbane and Redfern, there might be a bit of support for this, but there is certainly no support for it out in the western suburbs among the blue-collar workers, where the families are strong. Among the different communities, whether they be Catholic, Muslim or Jewish, it is an anathema. It is an anathema with my party. Senator Bishop said that he has not been lobbied very much. I can tell you, Madam Acting Deputy President, that I have not been lobbied at all except to say to me, ‘You stand up strongly for the basic unit of society, which is marriage and the family.’
I believe we now stand at the brink. We have to make a decision. Do we as a society turn away from everything we know and everything that our society is based on—the ideal that the family has been based on for thousands of years—or do we go the other way? Do we say, ‘Near enough is good enough, because it does not really hurt anyone, it does not cost anything and people want to do it; why not?’ and allow gay marriage and just give up on the ideal that the family is the basic unit of society and it gets there through marriage? We know from experience that the whole of the family—a marriage between a man and a woman—allows children to live in a safe, protected environment where they are allowed to grow into adults and pass strong values on to their children. The family is a continuum. We know this from experience, and therefore we continue with that ideal and look to uphold it.
I believe people have not thought this through. I think people in Australia do not give a lot of thought to these important issues, and we as members of parliament have to. From a distance, the issue of gay marriage looks a lot like other issues for Australian voters. From the outside it looks like it does not harm anyone, does not affect any individual who does not engage in it and does not seem to harbour any cost to the taxpayer or any other organisations. It seems relatively harmless—a relaxation of laws and conventions. If it does not hurt me and it does not hurt them, who does it hurt? It hurts society—that is who it hurts—and people have not thought it through.
What happens when the conventions are relaxed? What happens after the conventions have been removed? Marriage is based on a man and a woman, for the reason of having children. Two men and two women cannot conceive without some outside assistance. Marriage is not just a convention or a mere formality; it is a mechanism that was created by society to bring two sexes together and create a foundation of moral, social and legal protection and stability. Without this foundation, we are risking the lot. Like all things that have a foundation, society has a foundation. What is it based on? What is society based on? A man and a woman getting together, having children and then, in a broader sphere, an outer family of cousins, uncles and aunties, all providing support for the family, and that family fighting like crazy to make sure their kids get a good way of living, a good education and sometimes even the parents backing them into a home—people standing up for their family. The family is what people give their children. They send them to expensive schools and make great sacrifices for them because they believe in the family.
People think, ‘How does it affect me—a man marrying another man?’ If it is made legal they think it will not have an impact on their lives. But they have not considered the real harm that homosexual marriage can bring about, and there are three big harms in legalising homosexual marriage. It abolishes a child’s birthright to have both a mother and a father. Marriage includes the right to start a family. Under article 16 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the right to marry comes with the right to start a family. If two men are legally able to marry, they obtain the absolute right to have a child via surrogacy. After gay marriage is legalised, a child can henceforth be brought into the world without ever having the right to a mother and father. Sometimes this happens inadvertently—through desertion or death—but it is not something we plan for; it is not something we want.
Same-sex marriage says that a mother or a father does not matter to a child—and it does. Two mothers or two fathers cannot raise a child properly. Who takes a boy to football? Who tells him what is right from wrong? What does he do—go along with the two mums? How does he go camping and fishing? Yes, there might be some attempt by one of the mothers to fill in as a father figure but it will not work. It is defying nature. And what about a young girl changing from a teenager into a young woman? Is it fair to say to her, ‘You don’t have a mother; your mother can’t take you shopping’ or to not be able to help her understand how her body is changing? What are we trying to do here? Why are we trying to defy what has been the right thing for hundreds of thousands of years? What suddenly gives us the inspiration to think that we can have gay marriage and it will not affect anyone?
I say to the people who very narrowly think this through or who do not think it through: it is more than saying, ‘It doesn’t hurt me; it doesn’t cost anything.’ It is a lot more than that. Once you have gay marriage in law, you have normalised the law, you have normalised homosexual marriage in law, which forces the normalisation of homosexual behaviour in the wider culture—
Senator Hanson-Young interjecting—
Senator BOSWELL: I will not be drawn in, Senator—especially in the school curriculum. I ask the people of the Western Suburbs: if you have gay marriage and it is legal, how can a teacher discriminate between normal marriage and gay marriage? He has to explain both as part of the curriculum. How can a teacher explain one part of the law but not the other?
So I ask these people who think it does not hurt me: do they want their children to be taught about gay marriage?
Senator Hanson-Young: Why not?
Senator BOSWELL: That is the question—why not? You do not find it objectionable from your side of politics. My side of politics finds it abhorrent and does not want any part of it.
But that is what we have to face up to, because these things are like a salami slice. You start off thinking, ‘It doesn’t hurt anyone.’ Then: ‘Oh, little Freddy’s got to go listen to why homosexual marriage has nothing wrong with it. Why is nothing wrong with it? Because it’s legal. This parliament has made it legal.’ I say to the people: do you want that for your children? Some of you will not object. Some will think it is a good thing. Certainly the progressive left will think it is wonderful. But I do not think they will think it wonderful in the western suburbs—the people who rely on the ALP to defend their jobs through the unions. That is why they are there. They are not there to have their kids taught about homosexual marriage versus traditional marriage. That is going to happen the very day this legislation gets in. Once you legalise something, you cannot discriminate against it. It is happening already in America, where homosexual marriage became law and the next thing in Massachusetts was the teachers teaching about homosexual marriage and traditional marriage.
I want to quote from the Australian Education Union. This is what the teachers said: ‘If Australia normalises homosexual marriage, the Australian Education Union’s 2006 gender identity policy would be implemented. Homosexuality, bisexuality, transgenderism and the intersexed need to be normalised. All curricula should be written in non-heterosexist language.’ I suspect the Greens would not see any objection to that but I suspect the Labor people would go into meltdown, because this will be out there. This is what the teachers union have said—and why shouldn’t they? If it is legal, they have to teach it. If it is legal, it has to be taught. You cannot just pick out what you want to teach and not teach.
If homosexual behaviour is legalised then schools will have to treat homosexual behaviour and marriage on the same basis as heterosexual behaviour and marriage. Parents will no longer have the right to object to these teachings. All conscientious objection to both gay marriage and the normalisation of homosexual behaviour in the school curriculum would be abolished. That is what those people who think, ‘It doesn’t hurt me, it doesn’t cost me; if it doesn’t, let’s just let it go through’ are opening up. Let’s think a bit deeper because it is your society, your Australia that you are playing with.
I ask people, particularly from the Labor Party—and I admire the people who have had the courage to stand up over there: do you want your children to go into classrooms that give equal weight to heterosexuals and homosexuals? I do not think many of them do. There will be a few who support the Greens and think it is wonderful, but they are hugely in the minority. John Howard, whose views I admire and respect, said last year:
Changing the definition of marriage, which has lasted for time immemorial, is not an exercise in human rights and equality; it is an exercise in deauthorising the Judaeo-Christian influence in our society, and anybody who pretends otherwise is deluding themselves.
I agree with him. We are told there will be certain legislation that will respect churches and that, if they do not want to perform certain marriages, they will be excluded, but it does not take long for the antidiscrimination committee, instrumentalities, the Greens and GetUp! to start to wage a campaign.
If business or the churches object to hosting homosexual marriage or to blessing them, they will be hit. They will put up a defence, but it will only last for a certain time. They will be crushed by the anti-discrimination laws. We have already seen it happen in countries such as Denmark. The churches will have no choice but to facilitate homosexual marriage. We might push it out three years, four years or five years, but it will happen in the end. We have seen it happen with the abortion laws. You cannot walk away from them. You have to offer it or if you do not offer it then you have to find someone who will do the job. The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that any church situated in a member state where same-sex marriage is legal must marry same-sex couples or be found guilty of discrimination. It will happen here.
Marriage is a social institution with a biological foundation. All society does with marriage is to reinforce this biological fact, to keep men with their mate and then help raise their children. Society merely recognises that marriage is the most important relationship in nature and works to reinforce it. It has no right to reinvent marriage. Politicians have no right to redefine marriage, only to reinforce the biological purpose of marriage. I recall when there was discrimination—when there was huge discrimination—that I had a phone call from a certain minister who said, ‘We have just had a request for a gay doctor to bring his gay partner in and practice in a certain country community. We thought you would object, that you were the person most likely to object. If you let it go, it will go through.’ I said, ‘I could not possibly object to that, that would be discrimination.’ I think it was in 2008 that Warren Entsch brought in, or agitated through the party, that all forms of discrimination be removed. There is absolutely no discrimination against gay people other than the discrimination between heterosexual and same-sex marriage. Frank Brennan, the former chair of the National Human Rights Consultation Committee, said:
I think we can ensure non-discrimination against same-sex couples while at the same time maintaining a commitment to children of future generations being born of and being reared by a father and a mother.
His political masterstroke was to defeat Pauline Hanson in the Senate in 2004. He did it by organising numerous small groups. He got together the hunters, fishers and farmers to organise their preferences. It was like herding feral cats, but he did it.

And so on - you can never shut a bigoted politician when he's riding a favourite hobby horse - and the pond quoted Ron at such length to show why the pond will cheerfully speak ill of the dead, especially loathsome bigots dressed out in folksie garb, laden with climate science denialism.

Now on with the Angelic one's obituary:

This week a great and very good man died. Former National Party senator Ron Boswell was not every political and general know-all’s idea of a great man, but he was.
As Liberal Party elder John Howard said of him this week, “Ron’s battle with Pauline Hanson in 2004 symbolised his commitment to an open and tolerant National Party.”
However, although Ron’s defeat of Hanson was his most notable political achievement, unlike many contemporary seemingly conservative politicians he was a true small-C conservative. He never waded into the ever-shifting shallows of popular causes.

The reptiles interrupted with a snap and a caption: Senator Boswell’s political masterstroke was to defeat Pauline Hanson in the Senate in 2004.




That's it, that was his masterstroke?

The last time the pond checked Pauline was still waltzing into the Senate wearing a burqa while Ron is doing a Norwegian blue parrot imitation and pushing up daisies.

Carry on Angelic one, celebrate the bigot:

He was grounded in the fundamental beliefs: freedom and the family, especially the importance of the natural family. When the forces of conservatism had caved in to popular causes purporting to be about individual freedom, he knew that it was a strong nuclear family – mother, father and kids – that fostered the co-operation and individual resilience that was the only true bulwark against ideological domination by government. He realised that eventually this led to a corrosion of individual freedom and national weakness and uncertainty. The idea that “the government should fix it” was not in Ron’s lexicon.

The reptiles quickly interrupted with an AV distraction:

National Party Stalwart and former Queensland senator Ron Boswell has died at the age of 85. He passed away at his Brisbane home surrounded by family. Mr Boswell served as a senator from 1983 until retiring in 2014. He acted as the Nationals' senate leader for 17 years and the Father of the Senate from 2008. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says he will be remembered for his passion for his state and country.



Apparently Ron was a cosmopolitan, or so the Angelic one suggests:

Ron was a supporter of multicultural Australia, but unlike many other politicians he did not wave the multicultural flag without doing too much to support the people it encompassed. I remember particularly the Vietnamese contingent who were prominent at his farewell from politics in 2014.
The main thing that made him different was his ability to stay in touch with the people he represented. As he stated in his autobiography, he was very much of the view that politicians had moved too far away from the people they were supposed to represent. I think we all feel this and it affects many issues, even the current furore over a royal commission.
My view of Ron is as a friend and an outside journalistic view. Ron had no “image”. You got what you saw. Sartorially speaking, he was frankly a bit of a mess. His tie askew and shirt usually partially flapping outside his trousers, he always called you “mate”, and what with being somewhat overweight for long periods and possessing eyes that were not exactly aligned, he could easily be mistaken as an Australian politician in the Les Patterson mould. He often liked to talk about his humble beginnings as “a paintbrush salesman”.
However, Ron’s interests were wide-ranging, from supporting scientist Alan Mackay-Sim’s groundbreaking work on adult stem cells, to speaking out about the persecution of Christians in Syria, and helping some to leave. He had an acute sense of where the truth of an issue really lay.

It seems he also spared time for the ladies, no doubt happy to share a lamington or a pumpkin scone with them, Ron Boswell arrives at the LNP International Womens Day lunch at the Tattersall's Club in Brisbane in March 2015. Picture: Mark Cranitch




The Angelic one loved the way that Ron did his best to do down research of an un-Catholic kind:

On the stem cell issue his support of MacKay-Sim’s research into mature stem cells was crucial and should be counted as an achievement as important as the defeat of Hanson.
Initially, the script trotted out to the media and the public at large was that stem cells harvested from human embryos had almost magical qualities. They could be coaxed into any type of tissue and this would cure diseases from Alzheimer’s to cancer and replace damaged nerves and tissue in victims of paralysis. The public was bombarded with images of famous people who were paralysed after an accident, and embryologist Alan Trounson’s embryonic stem cell research was granted $40m.
However, embryonic stem cells didn’t work the way they were supposed to and, worse, they had to be harvested from live human embryos, which was highly unethical, as was the next solution: cloning embryos and harvesting their cells. Nevertheless, Australia passed laws legalising this and Ron was appalled.
However, behind the scenes, Mackay-Sim in Queensland had already developed a technique to harvest one’s own cells from nasal cells. This would allow for successful auto transplants and regeneration. It was part of world-first research, but in all the clamour over embryos almost no politician was interested in adult stem cell research – except Ron.
He went in to bat for Mackay-Sim and managed to secure funding for him to continue with his work. This research has led to the development of better techniques for transplant, especially for spinal cord repair. Meanwhile embryonic stem cell research has little to show for it. Trounson later decamped to California and greener grant pastures.

Judge the man by the company he kept and the causes he took up, sayeth the pond, as the reptiles provided visual evidence, Senator Ron Boswell with Alan Jones at the No Wind Farm Rally on the lawns of Parliament House in Canberra in June 2013.




Apparently news of the parrot's disgrace has yet to reach the Angelic one or the lizard Oz hive mind, as the Angelic one finished with a flourish of Latin:

In my opinion this was one of Ron’s outstanding achievements. Despite his at-times shambolic appearance and old-fashioned Queensland speech, Ron could see when it was the so-called smart people who were bamboozled and confused by clever PR.
He understood the science, which isn’t all that difficult but a lot of people, including politicians, were simply too uninterested or too careless of the ethical implications to see what was happening with embryonic stem cell research and allowed themselves to be misled by what has been dubbed “Frankenscience”.
Along with his other good points, Ron was a very warm-hearted person. After the death of his son he brought up and educated his grandson and was a hands-on grandfather, involved in his grandson’s schooling and the trends in education of all young people.
Along with other politicians I have known I’ve had Ron over to dinner a couple of times. I remember the panic when we had to make sure we had a sturdy, well-constructed chair for the senator’s large bulk. We knew Ron did not expect haute cuisine with his favourite rose, but who else but “Bozzie” would turn up at the front door not with wine but with a huge Cryovac bag full of crabmeat?
Vale Ron, a great man, a good Christian. Requiescat in pace.

If only hell existed, so that the pond might add best wishes to the wayward rogue, in the hope that he  requiescats in inferno ...

And so to a bonus for those who haven't had enough of Ron ...

Yes, the old rogue brought out the Canavan caravan, in the Currish Snail.

Why not celebrate it, if only for the sake of the pond's deep north correspondents ...

This is how the Canavan caravan proudly tweeted it ...



This is the archive link:

And for those too lazy to head off to the archive, this is the Canavan caravan, fuelled by coal and bigotry:



The curious thing about this is how Tamworth's shame features prominently, as if keeping the company of drunken, rolling in the gutter rogues was a virtue ...




It got so extreme that the reptiles in the final snap featured a glowering Barners, and only the back of the Queensland blue parrot's head ...



Phew, that's more than enough. especially given the bushfires and floods that have been raging and surging around the country.

Just time left for more than a few 'toons ...