Wednesday, March 18, 2026

In which the bromancer and "Ned" grapple with King Donald's folly ...


King Donald has finally got what he worked so diligently to achieve. 

International pariah state status.

And domestically things are a little on the nose. 

Even gutter dwellers of the Tim Pool kind are breaking away ... MAGA Pod Bros Rally Around Top Trump Official After Sudden Exit (*archive link)



That letter in CU?




Oh dear, and yet the news sounded so good in the lizard Oz ... 

After all, there's nothing like a couple of assassinations and Israel government anarchy to stir the lizard Oz blood, and get the hive mind's heart pounding away ...




But the business plan seemed in some kind of trouble ...



A buck for two months? That's the level of the bait and switch that's now needed?

But, for all its many failings,  the intermittent archive comes free...

Down below the news hovered the bromancer, and the pond immediately turned to him for advice and help, only to discover the proud reptile warrior was surprisingly gloomy:



The header: US and Iran locked in ‘horrible equilibrium’ with no clear path to victory: The US-Iran conflict has reached a dangerous equilibrium with Iran still controlling the Strait of Hormuz and Trump unable to achieve regime change.

The caption for the grinning, gesticulating loon: US President Donald Trump in Washington on Monday. Picture: AFP

The bromancer opened by hinting that a quagmire was in the making ...

Donald Trump and the mullahs have reached an ugly stalemate, perhaps indeed a quagmire, in Iran.
The war is poised at an unstable, dynamic and horrible equilibrium, where the US can’t quite win, and Iran won’t quite lose.
No matter what happens from here, Trump, and Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu, have greatly weakened Iran.
But while the Israelis may be satisfied that they have “mown the grass”, crippling the Iranian threat for a while, Trump has not met several key objectives.
There’s no sign of regime collapse, though that can happen suddenly, or even regime alteration. The Iranian President has been humiliated, but the presidency has never been a powerful post. The Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, rightly considered a terrorist group by many Western nations, shows no sign of breaking. It seems to be indoctrinated at sufficient depth, like its creation Hamas, that one fallen leader is simply replaced by others.
Yet without regime change, the Iranian threat will in time simply re-emerge.
Trump has also hit the limits of US unilateralism and his own chaotic communications style. Having abused and humiliated allies, he’s now calling for their naval assistance in the dangerous business of clearing the Strait of Hormuz.
No one is volunteering, even those nations sending military resources into the region.
It may be impossible to clear the Strait without a land invasion of Iran. It’s a very narrow waterway. Any Iranian boat can lay a sea mine, any diver attach an explosive to a ship’s hull. It may be possible to suppress Iranian missile firing, though the US hasn’t yet achieved that. It’s impossible to suppress drones, which can easily be fired off the back of a truck.

The reptiles did their best to inspire hope in the bromancer, Liberia-flagged tanker Shenlong Suezmax, carrying crude oil from Saudi Arabia, in Mumbai, India, last week. Picture: AP




But these days oils ain't oils ...

Iran also shows every sign of being able to keep up economically crippling attacks on its Gulf Arab neighbours. It’s still firing missiles in small numbers but has plenty of drones. Combined with closing the Strait of Hormuz, that means Tehran can impose a massive economic cost on the whole world, and an acute disruption on US allies in the Gulf.
One of Trump’s greatest strengths is his brazenness. He indicated a week ago that he could declare victory and go home. No one is better able to turn on a dime than Trump. But if he goes home while Iran still has the Strait of Hormuz shut, and perhaps before it even agrees to a ceasefire, that would be, notwithstanding the damage it’s taken, a significant win for Iran’s theocratic, totalitarian and blood-soaked regime.
There are a few other aspects of the equation which have got too little attention. The US and Israel have destroyed most of Iran’s conventional military forces, its navy and air force, much of its command structure, its industrial/military facilities and much of its missile stock and missile production facilities.
That’s hugely significant. But here is a key element of the jigsaw missing from most analysis. Iran has not used its conventional military forces much at all in its tremendous terror, destabilisation and proxy military campaigns.
The Iranian military and political leadership – in complete contrast to the Australian Defence establishment – understand profoundly the power of asymmetric warfare.
Asymmetric warfare is undertaken by weaker powers against stronger powers. Drones are a quintessential asymmetric weapon. So is terrorism. So are proxy militias. So is cyber warfare.

The reptiles decided to parrot King Donald's talking points...

US President Donald Trump has warned the United States is “locked and loaded” to destroy Iran’s key oil export hub on Kharg Island. Trump said the military could wipe out the facility “on five minutes’ notice” if he decided to give the order. The president described the island as Iran’s “crown jewel” and one of the regime’s most valuable strategic assets. Kharg Island handles the vast majority of Iran’s oil exports and is central to the country’s energy industry. US forces previously struck military targets on the island but deliberately avoided destroying the oil infrastructure.




Somebody forgot to tell the bromancer he should have sounded locked and loaded ...

So is disinformation.
All these things don’t cost much money, certainly compared with aircraft carriers and the like. They will be relatively easy for Iran to rebuild.
Israel has been shocked at how heavily the Shia terrorist militia Hezbollah has rearmed itself in Lebanon. Israel had inflicted massive damage on Hezbollah. The elimination of the Syrian regime was thought to have diminished if not eliminated Hezbollah’s resupply lines. The Lebanese state was supposedly newly empowered to disarm Hezbollah. There was a formal ceasefire and commitments made by Hezbollah about demilitarising.
Yet in the current conflict, Hezbollah initiated hostilities with Israel and is still firing rockets, drones, artillery and other projectiles into northern Israel, despite massive, renewed conventional military effort by Jerusalem.
The loyalty of the Iranian proxies to the mullahs in this conflict has been a shock for Western military planners. The Houthis are active again in Yemen, pro-Iranian forces are active again in Iraq. Pro-Iranian terror attacks have occurred again in the US.
This doesn’t mean Trump’s action was futile, or even unnecessary. It does show that with a determined enemy there are very few “short” wars and no predictable or guaranteed outcomes.
The other objective Trump seems unlikely to meet is definitively ending Iran’s nuclear program. Iran has 400kg of uranium enriched to 60 per cent, which is nearly weapons grade. Most of it seems to be stored near Isfahan. If there’s no regime change, the only guarantee for the US would be for special forces to go in physically and take the uranium out. That would be unbelievably dangerous.
Trump could alternatively order his forces to take Kharg Island, through which Iran gets 90 per cent of its income. But this would be a big, dangerous ground operation, which the US public is completely unprepared for.
The US could bomb Iranian electricity and other civilian infrastructure. But that inflicts a terrible human toll, doesn’t guarantee regime change and could generate millions of refugees.
The likeliest outcome may be that Washington and Tehran, on back channels, negotiate a ceasefire, even without the achievement of many US strategic aims.

No clamouring for a dinkum Oz ship to head off to the gulf and join in the action? No call to arms, no celebration of AUKUS?

What on earth has gone wrong with the bromancer?



Sadly the bro ignored his eternal war on China - not one mention of China in his piece! - so allow the pond to help out.

Trump Goes on Wild Rant as Irish PM Struggles Not to Laugh
FULL OF WIND
President Donald Trump reignited one of his favorite grievances, and the Irish prime minister could barely stifle his laughter at the absurdity. (*archive link)

Irish Prime Minister Micheál Martin could barely keep a straight face as President Donald Trump launched a rant about one of his signature complaints: windmills.
In an Oval Office appearance to commemorate St. Patrick’s Day, Trump took a question from a British reporter on U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s hesitation to fully support Trump’s war in Iran with the U.K.’s entire military might.
The president said he was disappointed with Starmer before going on an unintelligible rant about energy and wind turbines, which he constantly refers to as windmills.
“Windmills all over the country, destroying those gorgeous Scottish fields,” Trump said, reiterating his longtime hatred.
The president then repeated his lie that China, by and large, the world’s largest producer and user of wind energy, doesn’t use windmills.
“Windmills, which don’t work, uh, they’re tremendously expensive, and the best testament to that is the windmills are made in China, but China doesn’t use them,” Trump complained.

And so on and on, and that reminded the pond of another angle ...

How the Iran War Could Consolidate China’s Energy Dominance
Amid global oil and gas disruptions, China stands prepared for the electrostate era.
By Jason Bordoff, a columnist at Foreign Policy

...China appears highly vulnerable. Roughly half of its crude imports and a third of its LNG imports transit the Strait of Hormuz. With so much at stake, China’s foreign ministry quickly called for an end to hostilities and for all parties to ensure safe passage through the strait. This is why some analysts have cast Beijing as the likely “big loser” of Trump’s strike on Iran.
Yet over the longer term, there are at least three reasons China may emerge as a surprising beneficiary.
First, for more than two decades Beijing has pursued an energy security strategy designed precisely for moments like this. At its core is electrification: shifting more of the economy away from direct oil and gas consumption and thereby reducing exposure to volatile oil and gas markets prone to geopolitical disruption.
More than 30 percent of China’s final energy consumption now comes from electricity, compared with just over 20 percent globally. More than half of the cars sold in China are electric, the result of deliberate policies aimed as much at energy security as emissions reduction. The International Energy Agency estimates China has avoided 1.2 million barrels per day of oil demand growth since 2019 and now projects Chinese oil demand will peak in 2027, two years earlier than previously expected.
Beijing has also worked to generate as much of its electricity as possible from domestic sources. Coal and renewables dominate the power mix, while nearly all electricity demand growth in 2024 was met by clean sources, led by solar and wind. Half of all nuclear reactors under construction worldwide are in China. Although the country imports natural gas, only a modest share is used for power generation. In the event of prolonged LNG disruptions, China can lean more heavily on domestic sources of energy such as coal to bridge the gap.
China would still feel the sting of a global oil shock, of course. But its push to become an electrostate—rather than doubling down on crude production—has reduced its exposure. The United States may be the world’s largest oil producer and a major net exporter, yet because oil is priced globally, American consumers feel the pain at the pump just the same. The most durable hedge against oil shocks is to consume less oil, not merely to produce more.

All that ranting and railing at windmills and renewables by the lizards of Oz, and suddenly there's talk of the joys of being an electrostate?

Likely it was too much for King Donald and the lizard Oz hive mind to comprehend.

Putting King Donald fun aside momentarily, there were other reptiles out and about this day, and thank the long absent lord that the pond could consign them to the intermittent archive.

That took care of Dame Slap celebrating capitalism ...

The two faces of Mike Cannon-Brookes
All this talk of sacking people with heart and humanity can’t hide the fact Cannon-Brookes is – at heart – a brutal capitalist. And there’s no shame in that.
By Janet Albrechtsen
Columnist

It's not just sacking the planet that she loves, she loves all sorts of sackings, and brutalism of the most brutal kind.

And these pearls of wisdom could drop into the void ... the pond will accept no wannabe Dame Groan substitutes.

Bullock and her board are the authors of their own predicament
With the RBA’s credibility in tatters after a string of poor decisions and economic calls during the past few years, their hand was forced.
By David Pearl

If the pond wants that sort of commentary, it rarely finds the need to go beyond the infallible Pope ...



And the pond is by now well over the Canavan caravan, and so well over ancient Troy trying to pump up the hagiographical volume...

How a former communist plans to save the Nationals
What matters is not Canavan’s past but the future of the Nationals and the Coalition. The upshot is that Canavan should not be underestimated.
By Troy Bramston
Senior Writer

The pond knows from bitter experience that there's nothing worse than some fundamentalist religious nutter deciding to turn into an atheist nutter, unless it's the process in reverse - atheist turns Opus Dei - and ditto silly young men attracted to communism, who in later days turn into loons of the "coals that batter" Canavan caravan kind.

See Emeritus chairman Rupert for how that plays ... how easy it is to toss off talk of being young Red Rupert, and then in baleful older age, don the black shirt and red MAGA cap, especially if there's a buck in the offing and blood to sell to a vampire...

Never mind, that diligent weeding and sorting left room for "Ned's" natter to join the bromancer blathering about the war...



The header posing an enormously silly couple of questions: Trump as wartime President – is he fit for purpose? Having attacked Iran with no reference to allies, Trump now needs everybody’s help. Suddenly, he is desperate for an allied coalition. Who would have believed?

The caption for the orange clown: US President Donald Trump speaks to reporters before boarding Marine One. Picture: Brendan Smialowski / AFP

Only in the hive mind could you find a reptile still wondering if King Donald was fit for purpose ...



Okay, the pond needs some help to get through this modest sojourn with "Ned, because he wasjust as gloomy as the bromancer.

On the upside, "Ned" kept this Everest climb to a seemly four minute amble up a modest hill, stuffing it full of banal observations and laughable billy goat butts of the "final judgments still await" kind ...

The world is now seeing another side of Donald Trump – a President under serious pressure over a war he chose but confronting the consequence of a conflict spinning out of his control.
The assumption that many commentators made at the start, myself included, is that Trump at some stage would declare a victory and evacuate the field. But the Iranian regime has made that option far more complicated. Trump is now trapped since this conflict has evolved into two related wars.
The first war has proceeded well in a military sense, given large-scale destruction of Iran’s military and naval capacity that must leave a diminished regime – but Trump’s blunder was his pledge of regime change from the air, an idea historically improbable and ignorant of the nature of the regime and of Iranian identity.
Trump told the regime’s military to “lay down your weapons” or “face certain death”. Final judgments still await, but this bravado seems to have misunderstood the fanatical ideology and structural power of the regime. Into the third week the regime is not only still alive and functioning but is spreading chaos and destruction, attacking the Gulf states and effectively closing the Strait of Hormuz – squeezing global energy supplies, driving up prices and threatening the world economy.

The reptiles flung in a standard snap of the King ...President Donald Trump waves as he boards Air Force One. Picture: Juloa Demaree / AP Photo.




The pond had passed up several chances to celebrate the king, but couldn't resist any longer ...





It was becoming clear that "Ned" couldn't cope, and so he reverted to his usual impression of a headless chook scuttling about, startled by falling clouds ...

There is no sign Trump foresaw or planned for such a contingency. Yet this scenario has been basic to US and Western war-gaming conflicts with Iran for years. It is further evidence that Trump launched this war with an irresponsible lack of planning and a disastrous misjudgment about the regime’s capacity to provoke a global energy crisis.
The Wall Street Journal reported on March 13 that Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine warned the President in several briefings before the war that a US attack could prompt Iran to close the Strait of Hormuz and possibly deploy mines, drones and missiles to disrupt the world’s vital shipping corridor.
Yet Trump, while acknowledging the risk, said Iran would likely be forced to capitulate before such a decision and, even if Iran tried, the US military could handle it. This seems to reflect the ignorant and cavalier attitude of Trump towards his most important war decision as President. It is like his tariff policy – Trump acts without thinking issues through.
It raises the question: to what extent has Trump undermined US national security decision-making? America risks living with a wartime President who lacks the emotional and intellectual strengths for the task.

The reptiles slipped in a snap of the general with a surprisingly modest array of scrambled eggs for decor ... Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dan Caine



What about the real warrior? Couldn't the reptiles rustle up a snap of their onetime Faux Noise kissing cousin?





At least "Ned" took note of China in his piece ...

The regime, while damaged, has now put Trump under pressure. Trump is being forced to accept as a war goal something he never envisaged – having to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
How to do this? Well, Trump doesn’t really know.
Last week Trump said “We’ve won.” Yet he now battles to thwart a global energy crisis. Having accepted that he must free up the strait, the President can hardly declare victory and head to the exit with the world facing an oil shortage, higher inflation and weaker economic growth.
This is turning into a battle of US power versus Iran’s endurance. The regime’s tactic is to impose such political pain on Trump that he cracks under the pressure. It targets Trump’s vulnerability: that he lacks the temperament or the character to fight for the long haul.
Trump’s bravado never stops. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said: “The Pentagon has been planning for Iran’s desperate and reckless closure of the Strait of Hormuz for decades, and it has been part of the Trump administration’s planning well before Operation Epic Fury was ever launched.”
The world awaits. In the interim, the story is ominous. While declaring victory, Trump has appealed to a range of nations – Britain, France, China, Japan and South Korea – to send ships to help the US to reopen the strait. His appeal implies the US can’t do the job alone. Having attacked Iran with no reference to allies, Trump now needs everybody’s help. Suddenly, he is desperate for an allied coalition. Who would have believed?

Who could have doubted? Only clueless reptiles stuck in the lizard Oz hive mind.

Cue a snap of Xi, Chinese President Xi Jinping, left, and Chinese Premier Li Qiang arrives for the closing ceremony of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference. Picture: Vincent Thian / AP Photo.




Oh, the poor king, left dangling ...




"Ned" ended on a gloomy, almost defeatist, note, dangling in the void with the Faux Noise King ...

In an interview with the Financial Times, Trump threatened NATO countries, saying if it’s a negative response “I think it will be very bad for the future of NATO”. Incredibly, he implies this is a test of the alliance. But NATO countries will need to think hard about sending ships to a likely doomed mission since the narrowness of the strait becomes a killing field for Iranian missiles.
As for China, the main US rival and a close supporter of Iran, Trump wants to delay his upcoming visit to China to put pressure on Beijing to help in the Gulf. So the Iran war is stretching into US-China relations. He needs China’s help – not a smart prelude to talks with Xi Jinping.
As for Russia, Trump has made it a big winner by relaxing sanctions on its energy exports. The power reality is alarming: the more Trump expends US resources in the Middle East, the more Russia and China are the winners.
Trump cannot let Iran win the energy war, but what price to stop it? The other option is ground forces, an option Trump has kept open with his deployment of a marine force to the region.
As the Journal said, Trump might now face a choice between defeat or escalation, neither being remotely entertained a few weeks ago. Trump began this war with devastating damage to Iran’s military capabilities and a powerful sense that reckoning time had come for Iran’s terrorist and fanatical regime. The problem lies in his manifest defects as a war leader – the grave shadow that hangs over this crisis.

 Really? That's the best "Ned's" got?

His manifest defects as a war leader, as if those were the only defects in a wretch so defective he might as well be a Tesla cybertruck.

The pond found this vastly more amusing, even if its explanation of the reasons for start of the first world war is inclined to the mindlessly simplistic ...




Now will somebody shush that baby, the reptiles haven't caught a decent night's sleep in days ...




And finally, the pond is currently on an LBC/James O'Brien jag ...




Tuesday, March 17, 2026

In which the bromancer leads the war mongering, the Canavan caravan arrives in the hive mind, and Dame Groan spends words on Spender ...

 

Yet more Murdochiana for herpetology students:

Where earlier writers have drawn parallels with Shakespeare’s King Lear, Sherman thinks King Midas is a more appropriate comparison:
"Like the mythical monarch whose touch turned everything to gold, Rupert built a $17 billion fortune but destroyed everything he loved in the process. His media outlets stoked hatred and division on an industrial scale, and amassing that wealth required him to damage virtually anything he touched: the environment, women’s rights, the Republican Party, truth, decency – even his own family."

Much more at The Conversation.

The pond is content to note that he, his spawn, and his minion at the lizard Oz continue to damage virtually everything there is to damage ...

I've seen the rags and the damage done
A little part of it in everyone
But every reptiles's like a settin' sun

And so to the damage done this day, and this day the reptiles decided to get very solemn about Iran, yet try as it might the pond simply couldn't discern a mention of the 150+ schoolgirls murdered in the recent American bombing - a bombing denied by King Donald, but widely acknowledged as an infamous American act, performed during an entirely needless act of adventurism, which if anything has helped entrench the mad Mullahs while making the long suffering Iranian civilian population suffer even more (while news trickles in from Venezuela that that odious regime is still conducting torture under King Donald's mandate, provided they keep forwarding him oil money).



You shouldn't be able to get away with deploring the mad Mullahs, oppressive as they are, while at the same time, ignoring a million or so displaced in Lebanon and the many other civilians killed in the current campaign - apparently, if you trust King Donald's words, being done "for fun".

Down at the bottom of that litany, garrulous Gemma made a bog standard appearance. 

Off to the intermittent archive with her ...

Commentary by Gemma Tognini
At the Oscars, some victims are just more worthy than others
Hollywood’s stars rarely miss a chance to champion fashionable causes, but the silence on Iran at this year’s Oscars highlights what critics say is a pattern of selective activism.

The pond isn't much interested in the sight of a whining snowflake, always with a grievance to hand, but does regret that it didn't watch the Oscars. 

Apparently Sean Penn didn't show up and instead went off to show support for Ukraine, but no doubt grating Gemma stands proudly with Vlad the sociopath.

As a result of only catching theWeapons-inspired cold open and the opening monologue, the pond entirely missed the key awards ...



Now on with the pond's favourite warmonger.



The header: No nation has had more wake-up calls than ours; Though we are the biggest island nation in the world, the Americans know that as a military force the Australian navy is essentially non-existent.

The caption for the bromancer's villains: (R-L) Anthony Albanese, Chris Bowen, Richard Marles and Penny Wong address the media at Parliament House. Picture: NewsWire /Martin Ollman

The bromancer was, in his usual way, itching for a bit of kit so that he could take part in the adventurism, and never mind that there was no sane reason to join King Donald in his folly ...

That the Albanese government has gone out loud and proud to announce, without even being asked, that it’s certainly not going to send an Australian navy ship to help keep the Strait of Hormuz safe for international shipping is much more significant than it looks, and bespeaks a shocking Australian impotence.
The Iran war is another wake-up call for our nation. No nation has had more wake-up calls, yet on defence we’re determined to stick to our Mogadon habit.
The decision was somewhat weirdly announced by Infrastructure Minister Catherine King, presumably because Anthony Albanese and Defence Minister Richard Marles want to restrict themselves to happy talk.
Here’s the real significance. Though we are the biggest island nation in the world, our navy is effectively defunct. Donald Trump announced a long list of nations he would like to contribute to escorting cargo vessels through the Strait of Hormuz. We weren’t on it.
Trump specifically mentioned China, France, Japan, South Korea and the UK, and later expanded the demand to include NATO allies generally. It’s worth noting just what a horrible strategic mess Trump has created by first insulting allies, then demanding their military support.
British television coverage, when Trump’s demand was first published, was full of patriotic outrage at Trump first insulting Keir Starmer’s offer of an aircraft carrier, then days later demanding British ships.

Well yes, the whole sordid, mismanaged affair has been extremely stupid ...



But the bromancer has always shown a lingering affection for the mad King ... President Donald Trump walks on the South Lawn upon his arrival to the White House. Picture: Jose Luis Magana / AP Photo




But even the bromancer had to admit that the orange clown had come up with some strange notions in recent times ...

Even more bizarre was Trump’s request for Chinese naval support given that Beijing is a close partner of Iran and has condemned the whole American action in Iran, though Beijing is delighted to see how much American materiel is being used up in the Iran war. It’s tremendously chuffed that Trump has withdrawn significant military resources from South Korea and Japan to send to the Middle East.
But it’s notable that despite Australia being the second or third closest ally to the US, after Britain and, all things considered, probably Japan too, we weren’t asked for a naval contribution. This is because the Americans know that as a military force the Australian navy is essentially non-existent at the moment.
In our surface fleet we notionally have seven Anzac-class frigates, though they are so old that to send them into harm’s way now would rank surely as a species of elder abuse, and three Hobart-class air warfare destroyers. The frigates each have eight vertical launch cells, just eight. Many modern destroyers have well over 100.
The Iranians fire missiles and drones at ships. The Anzacs deploy fairly short-range Evolved Sea Sparrow Missiles in their vertical launch cells. In terms of self-defence, that’s pretty much it. In the conflict with the Houthis in the Red Sea, the US Navy mainly used much longer-range SM2 and SM6 missiles. That’s because if you miss an incoming missile with a long-range shot you can have another go with your short-range defence systems. If you miss with a short-range effort, you’re dead.

The reptiles tried to placate the bromancer's death wish with a bit of kit ... Cargo including bombs are removed from a C-130J-30 Super Hercule after landing at RAF Fairford in Fairford, England. The US is using the RAF base as part of its military operations in Iran. Picture: Matthew Horwood / Getty Images



How he yearned to get involve in a stoush ...

Nor do the Anzacs have sophisticated counter-drone systems. The Ukrainians, Iranians and Houthis have all shown that drones can be used to devastating effect against conventional navy ships. If our Anzac frigates ever did fire off their missiles they would be exhausted and in need of replenishment in five minutes. The commander of any US taskforce would regard the Anzacs as a liability, just another ship the Americans had to defend. Of our three Hobart-class destroyers, one is in a long-term upgrade and therefore out of action. Of the other two, perhaps one could be sent. They are optimised for air defence, not what’s happening in the Strait of Hormuz.
They have 48 VLS each, about half a US Arleigh Burke-class destroyer. Beyond that they have Phalanx Gatling guns, which can be a last line of defence against incoming drones. They don’t have complex counter-drone systems.
To be effective in high-intensity environments, ships need layered systems of defence. The Hobarts don’t have them. And of course they would be completely reliant on the US for what are becoming extremely scarce missiles as we have pitiful, truly pitiful, stocks of such missiles ourselves.
The Hobart-class is much more capable than the Anzacs, but its utility would be marginal in the Strait of Hormuz. And if we sent one we would in effect be sending the entirety of our surface fleet capability.

And what's the point of being ready to set sail on a futile attempt to prove the old adage that if you break it, you own it? 

Not much beyond offering the bromancer shots of kit, Leading Seaman Aircrewman Liam Sulley looks out towards HMAS Brisbane as the ship transits through the Prince of Wales Channel, off the coast of Queensland.




At this point the bromancer came up with a line that had the pond rolling Jaffas down the aisle:

It’s probable that Trump can’t open the Hormuz strait even with allies’ help. 

So futility is the game?

“If there really had been a Mercutio, and if there really were a Paradise, Mercutio might be hanging out with teenage Vietnam draftee casualties now, talking about what it felt like to die for other people's vanity and foolishness.” ― Kurt Vonnegut, Hocus Pocus (Or perhaps experience a city-wide fire bombing?)

Bravely the bromancer tried to redeem the situation with a billy goat butt ...

But our absolute lack of defence capability is the greatest national scandal of our time. It’s bipartisan in creation. The previous Coalition government was almost as bad as the Albanese government in defence.
Australians should recognise the decisions we’ve made. Just as we’ve decided to keep barely a month’s worth of fuel in reserve so that we couldn’t withstand any interruption to supply, so we have decided not to have any meaningful defence capability.
We’ve not made any significant investment in the kind of drones devastatingly effective in the Ukraine, Iran and Houthi conflicts – swarming, cheap drones in huge numbers.
The Wedgetail air reconnaissance and control plane we’ve sent to the United Arab Emirates is a useful plane if you have an air force or missile defence system to direct. We don’t have significant missile defence in Australia so it’s best used overseas.
The Albanese government has faithfully re-created the worst of Liberal-National defence policy. We take an eternity to procure a tiny number of sophisticated platforms that can be used only as niche capabilities folding into an American operation.
Marcus Hellyer, the best defence budget analyst in Australia, recently published a paper showing that Defence’s Portfolio Additional Estimates Statement discloses that the Albanese government has actually cut defence spending. It has imposed a $1.5bn “efficiency dividend” (honestly, you can’t make this stuff up) on defence, which it had not imposed before, and the entirely fictional “dividend” goes back to consolidated revenue, it’s not kept by defence.

There came a final bit of kit, thankfully lying idle, and not off on a gulf adventure,  HMAS Ballarat (II) in Darwin is the sixth of eight Anzac Class frigates built by Tenix Defence Systems at Williamstown, Victoria for the Royal Australian Navy.




How the lizard Oz's war monger in chief mourned the way we couldn't join this fabulous gulf excursion ...

Further, in famously bringing forward some defence spending in the last budget, the government has cut planned spending across the forward estimates so that, according to Hellyer, by 2027-28 defence spending, on the government’s own figures, will still be just 2.05 per cent of GDP.
If we ever lose the US alliance we are completely defenceless. No doubt Beijing will never want to do this, but in terms of sheer military capability China could do everything to Australia that the US has done to Iran. The difference is, unlike Iran, we couldn’t fight back. And unlike Iran, we’d run out of fuel in five minutes.
We are a deeply foolish nation to let this entirely avoidable set of circumstances continue.

Trust King Donald? We're already completely defenceless, keeping company with a clown car ...



Luckily as something of an offset, that lesser member of the Kelly gang, Joe, was on hand to question the wisdom of it all, and as he only took two minutes to do it, a couple of screen caps covered his thoughts.



Riddled with contradictions? That's an understatement for the mad King, who of late has started to sound bonkers ...



All those incoherent fascist ramblings did was set off Brendan of the FFC and help produce panic buying ...



No wonder Joe was sounding cautious:




With Joe done and dusted, the pond also took to a screen cap for the Canavan caravan:



And that's it for the pond, which has such a contempt for this doofus that it simply couldn't stomach the nonsense, and sent the rest off to the archive ...



(Those are just to wash the Canavan caravan stench from the nostrils).

On the upside, that cleared room for Dame Groan's usual Tuesday groaning ...



The header for the complacent old biddy: Allegra Spender’s tax white paper misses the mark; Older people have always been wealthier than younger folk. This is just a natural outcome of the life cycle of work and family formation.

The caption for the portrait, shown with the sort of grimace the reptiles love to have on hand for their enemies: Allegra Spender. Pictures: iStock/News Corp

Why did Dame Groan decide to have a go at an indie, who has no effective mechanism for doing anything much beyond doing reports?

Because it's easy ...

It must go with the territory. The member for Wentworth puts out a report on tax reform. It’s done for the greater good, not to address the local concerns of constituents. It’s the sort of thing that school captains do.
Early in his term, Malcolm Turnbull released a report outlining a series of tax reform proposals. Now teal member Allegra Spender has put out a report entitled Rewarding Effort in Taxing Times, using the services of known advocates of changing the tax system.
There is nothing new in Spender’s effort. Indeed, we had a federal election in 2019 when the electorate was asked for its opinion on many of the issues canvassed: changes to negative gearing, capital gains tax, the taxation of trusts and several other proposals. We all know the result of that election.
The fundamental problem of Spender’s report is the false premise that wages are taxed too much relative to capital. Of course, we may be overtaxed overall, but it’s the sensitivity of the relative burden that Spender doesn’t seem to understand. She really thinks she’s on to something when she simplistically refers to someone earning $100,000 a year. If it’s from wages, the tax is $23,000; if it’s from capital gains it’s $7000; and if it’s from superannuation, it’s zero if the person is retired.

Naturally the reptiles dragged another enemy into the affair, Malware himself, Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull. Picture: David Gray / AFP



But if Dame Groan wanted to have a go at someone, why couldn't she tackle this sort of Canavan caravan drivel?

...Things have not been this dire for Australian families since the 1970s, the last time the world faced a major oil crisis. Australia then withstood the shortages better than most because we had just started pumping oil from the Bass Strait. While we were impacted by the global economic downturn of the 70s, Australian petrol bowsers did not have labels put on them, “not in use”.
That was because the Menzies government had the foresight after World War II to subsidise the drilling for oil. BHP, partnering with Esso, took up the offer and the Bass Strait helped provide the fuel for Bathurst 500 winners for a generation – along with other important things.
Just 25 years ago Australia produced 96 per cent of our raw petroleum needs and we made 70 per cent of our demand for refined liquid fuels. Today, the Bass Strait has dried up and we produce less than half of our raw petroleum needs, with less than 30 per cent refined here. While this is the bad news, the good news is that we can restore our living standards because we have all we need here in Australia. We have enormous oil reserves under our feet, but if we don’t drill we will never find them.
If we end our obsession with net zero we can get back to using our resources for the Australian people again. Our artificial ban on the use of our own resources (coal, gas and uranium) is at the heart of why we have gone from some of the lowest energy prices in the world to some of the highest.
There is nothing wrong with Australia that cannot be fixed with what we have here. We do not need to import basic commodities, we do not need to import foreign ideas, we do not need to import people to artificially pump our economic statistics.

Profound apologies.

The pond had promised to ignore the Canavan caravan, but simply couldn't help itself. 

Not when Dame Groan is spending all her verbiage on Spender.

Still, the desire to plunge back into the Canavan caravan cesspool must help explain the pond's fixation on regurgitating Dame Groan's talking points:

But here’s the point. Those capital gains have been made because people have used post-tax income to buy assets. And that tax-free income for superannuants is after a great deal of contributions and earnings tax has been paid. In fact, calculated in cumulative terms, the current tax burden on superannuation is already high.
There is also the further important point that capital is much more mobile than labour. It’s why around the world capital is taxed concessionally relative to wages and other income. Given the importance of capital accumulation to economic performance, it’s very important to get this balance right.
Australia’s capital gains tax is already high by international standards. Several countries don’t even have one, including Singapore and New Zealand, and the rate is highly concessional in the US.
Spender is keen to see the longstanding arrangements for taxing trusts altered, notwithstanding the fact she is a beneficiary of several family trusts. Weirdly, she doesn’t seem to be fully au fait with how the taxation of most trusts work. Each beneficiary pays income tax at their top marginal rate and all the trust income must be distributed each year. It is only the return on assets that can be split, not income from labour.
She makes the point that trusts are also about asset preservation but fails to note that many small businesses are set up as trusts. To impose a minimum tax rate on all beneficiaries – her proposal is 27.5c in the dollar – would be punitive for many mum-and-dad businesses as many of these businesses are struggling to survive.

The reptiles decided to interrupt with an AV distraction featuring the dog botherer on Sky Noise down under (still no rebrand?): 

Sky News host Chris Kenny says Australians “pay too much” tax to the government for them not to “spend it wisely”. Mr Kenny said the “latest champion” for tax reform is the “multi-millionaire” teal MP, Allegra Spender. “I mean she's wealthy beyond the dreams of most Australians, good on her, but when you look at her complex web of companies and trusts, one of its functions must be to minimise the tax payable. “Clearly she knows the tax system very well, but nobody should fall for the pretense (sic) that she can cut taxes for anyone else.”



All very well, but meanwhile the Canavan caravan was getting away with this sort of bilge, a kind of deeply weird variation on "more gruel":

We just need more Australia. More Australian farming, more Australian mining, more Australian manufacturing, more Australian jobs, more Australian everything.
Many of the solutions can be found in regional Australia. Regional Australia is where we can expand farming, mining, energy production (of all types!), manufacturing and tourism.
It is also in regional Australia where we can protect our way of life. The Australian dream should include the birthright to own a home with a backyard big enough to play a game of cricket in. Backyards will become as extinct as the Tasmanian tiger if we keep stacking people up in our capital cities.
Unique in the world, Australia crams in more than half of its population in just five mainland capital cities, all on our coast. The top five cities in the US house around 15 per cent of their population.
Attracting people to the regions needs investment in roads, industry and hospitals. But we also need to encourage more work from home opportunities. It takes two jobs for most families to move now, and work from home allows people in the bush to have many professional jobs (in law, finance and the like) away from where the “sunlight struggles feebly down between the houses tall”.
If we spread our population out more, that will reduce demand for the scarce land left in our capital cities, which will put downward pressure on housing costs.
Not everyone will want to move to a country town but the people who do will free up a home for those who don’t.

Sorry, the pond has lived in a country town, and not just Adelaide, and doesn't need any of that kind of crap. 

The Canavan caravan might want to quote Clancy of the Overflow in the cause of skin cancer, but the pond endured the Tamworth flies for way too long.

Dame Groan sailed on oblivious, still spending words on Spender. Take that younglings, back in your box vulgar youff:

The larger theme behind Spender’s earnest report is growing intergenerational inequality: “Young people today face challenges of their own, particularly in establishing financial security in the way their parents did. We see this in the stalling levels of household wealth of younger generations, most acutely felt by those finding it difficult to afford housing that is close to family, opportunities and employment.”
Here’s the thing: older people have always been wealthier than younger folk. This is just a natural outcome of the life cycle of work and family formation.
Young people invest in their education, work on their careers, consume rather than invest. It is only after several years that individuals and couples can start to accumulate wealth.
Is it possible that the extent of intergenerational inequality has worsened? Those 60 and older have benefited from that purple patch of economic reform; think Hawke-Keating and Howard-Costello. Younger generations, by contrast, have had to put up with nearly two decades of zero reform and stalling living standards.
When it comes to housing affordability, that demand was allowed to grow far too strongly thanks to excessive migrant intakes meant that supply could never keep up. Negative gearing has been part of the tax code for more than a century and the current CGT arrangements have been in place for a quarter of a century. They simply can’t be the main explanation for recent rising house prices, which have been a global phenomenon.
In fact, the main weakness of our tax system is a top marginal income tax rate that is too high and drives a great deal of behaviour, and not just by the well-off. Even Bill Kelty and Paul Keating agree on this point. But Spender was never going there.
The member for Wentworth would have spent her time and resources more effectively by concentrating on the expenditure side of the budget ledger.

Tax cuts for the rich! Always the best solution:

Then there came a final snap of the villainess of the day: Allegra Spender MP during Question Time at Parliament House in Canberra. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman




The pond should play fair and note the final Canavan carry on, but what a creepy image to start, three men smirking while talking about women's wombs and the need for them to revert to the kitchen ...




Shades of a recurring, never ending pond nightmare ...




All the pond can do is hope that the Canavan caravan runs out of ticker like that insanely grinning loon ... as Dame Groan had a final groaning in her ...and eventually she reverted to her usual mission, ravaging Jimbo ...

That federal government payments as a percentage of GDP have increased by two percentage points under Labor really doesn’t bear thinking about. Do we all feel miraculously better off as a result? It is surely obvious that a great deal of government spending is effectively squandered by greedy providers and outright fraud.
In the meantime, Jim Chalmers is working on a federal budget that will meet the “reform” test being imposed by the press gallery. Read my lips: This is not the most important budget of this century, not even close.
To rush complex tax proposals is to invite chaos and confusion. Let’s not forget here that it effectively took four years to finalise the GST package. Look also at how long it took to pass the new superannuation tax laws on large bal­ances, including the deeply misguided proposal to tax unrealised capital gains, since dropped.
My advice is to hang on to your hat. There is no reason to have any confidence in the decision-making ability of Chalmers or the quality of the advice he receives from Treasury.
With inflationary pressures building and likely rises in interest rates, it’s not a good time to be implementing radical tax changes with uncertain consequences. Sadly, this is unlikely to deter our Treasurer.

Any concession for the way that the world is currently being turned upside down by a narcissistic king in the grip of dementia, and cowardly minions strutting about in shoes a couple of sizes too big?

Nah, it's not the way of Dame Groan, but you've got to admire how the entire world is being redacted as a form of distraction ...




Finally, a little more propaganda from the Poms ...



Monday, March 16, 2026

In which the pond returns to sending reptiles to the intermittent archive, but saves the Caterist and the Major for a savouring ...

 A brief note for students of the cult, anxious to pass their pending herpetological studies exam ...

“The Murdochs” is a messier “Succession”
Netflix's strangely entertaining new docuseries explains the ascendance of Fox News in the age of Trump

That isn't to encourage a Netflix sub - there are other means for those in the know - but it's a fair entertainment, as explained by Melanie McFarland for Salon ...

...“Succession” got that part right more than we knew. When Rupert’s children watched its too-close-for-comfort version of the chaos following Logan Roy’s sudden death, they leapt to nail down their family’s succession plan before it was too late. This provocation sets the narrative in motion, framed by Garbus’ choice to illustrate the children’s ambitions by animating them as pieces on a game board modeled after Monopoly.
If this were a different family, and if we existed in another version of this world, “Dynasty: The Murdochs” might strike us as a tragedy. Time and again, Garbus and her experts’ perspectives responsibly remind us that we’re watching a father shatter the bonds between his children. But this same factor, combined with Rupert Murdoch’s leading role in distorting the public’s relationships with facts and truth, makes it easier to view all this from a distance.

And again ...

...In the end, Lachlan received the long-sought kiss from daddy while James discovered, through an assortment of leaks, how much his mother and father couldn’t stomach him. How unfortunate. Also, how much is this family worth after all that? Forbes places its current estimate in the ballpark of $22.6 billion.
For all the emotional and psychological detail like this spilled in “Dynasty: The Murdochs,” it doesn’t make a play for our sympathies or leave us feeling any particular way about these people. What struck me instead is how ably Garbus presents what Rupert Murdoch and men like him have wrought as not just a blight on society but a pox on all our houses, including his own. The right’s parasocial relationship with such families keeps them in business because it profits them for some of the smallfolk to believe they share our frailties, or that we might become one of them someday. After all, a multibillion-dollar net worth pays for plenty of therapy.

No doubt some think the Ellison family is the new media dynasty to watch, but the pond remains loyal, because there's nothing more compelling than the decline of a family through hubris and shifting fortunes ...

And now, with the paywall clanging shut on the lizard Oz, the pond can return to performing its community service ... and the good news is that the intermittent archive has returned, at least for the moment, so the pond consign assorted whining reptile snowflakes to that cornfield (warning, errors still abound)...

Off you go ...

Conservative women face a selective standard that questions their political legitimacy
Female political credibility gets distributed unevenly based on ideology, with conservative women’s motives questioned rather than their arguments engaged.
By Julianna Burgess
Contributor

You want to play with the team led by the beefy boofhead from down Goulburn way? 

Learn how to use a stiff arm while abandoning humanity ...

The pond will do a teaser trailer because the opening was very droll ...



Did you notice?

In classic fashion, the reptiles opened that piece with a gormless snap of a meaningless table and chairs sighting - women, stay in the kindy - with the illustration the cover for a male shadow minister blathering into the void ...

Meanwhile you could read in another place ...


...Professor Hodgson points out that income splitting doesn’t account for what we now know about financial control within abusive relationships, not to mention women’s increasing desire for financial autonomy within marriage.
“The policy is a throwback to the main breadwinner model that we became accustomed to until the ’70s and ’80s, when it was normal to have one person earning and the other person at home,” says Professor Hodgson.
And here lies the social narrative behind the fiscal arguments for income splitting.
Last year, the opposition inflicted untold damage on itself with its election policy to restrict working-from-home for public servants.
The Liberals were blindsided by the huge backlash against that policy – it was as though no one in their ranks had spoken to, or even passed in the street, a contemporary working family in the previous five years.
The fiasco over that policy only worsened the Liberals’ so-called “Woman Problem”.
There are benefits to income splitting, and as teal independent Allegra Spender keeps saying, our system taxes incomes too highly, and wealth too lightly.
But the Coalition needs to be careful in proposing a tax strategy that preferences the male-breadwinner family model, which penalises single parents, and which threatens to hamper female workforce participation.
They risk repeating the mistakes of the past, and projecting themselves, again, as a party that refuses to accept the reality of how working families manage themselves in 2026.
Not how they used to, in a romanticised past – a rose-tinted time when families could survive on a single income, when women were discouraged from working outside the home, and when Hills Hoists were still proudly Australian.

Have a good time in the 1950s Julianna ...

The pond also sent this off to the cornfield ...

Taxpayer-funded Jew hate is now just par for the course
‘Antisemitism is welcome’: How a DJ’s rant exposed a crisis in Australia
Australia’s premier arts festival becomes flashpoint for antisemitism debate as DJ’s conspiracy theories expose cultural institutions’ failure to maintain basic decency standards.
By Nick Dyrenfurth

Instead of that, what with Israel bombing the bejesus out of Lebanon and Iran, and using that as cover for ongoing ethnic cleansing in the West Bank and Gaza, time to note another piece in Haaretz ...

The issue of the refusal to obey military orders remains one of the most sensitive, toxic subjects in Israel. But with the IDF assault on northern Gaza leading to expulsion of Palestinian civilians and a humanitarian crisis, some Israelis believe that these are war crimes and illegal orders that soldiers are obliged to refuse
This Tuesday marked the 68th anniversary of the massacre at Kafr Qasem. On October 29, 1956, Israel's Border Police opened fire on Arab citizens, civilians returning from agricultural work, claiming they were ordered to enforce a new wartime curfew that had been announced while the laborers were away in their fields. When it was over, 50 unarmed civilians were dead.
The massacre was a stain on Israel's conscience, but Israeli Jews tend to recall that justice was done: a special military tribunal eventually convicted a number of the perpetrators and sentenced them to jail time. Most famously, Justice Benjamin Halevy issued a landmark ruling rejecting the defendants' arguments that they were following orders to shoot anyone arriving after curfew. Instead, he warned that a soldier who receives a manifestly illegal order, so terrible that a "black flag" flies above it, is not only permitted but obliged to disobey.
This Tuesday, coinciding with the Kafr Qasem anniversary, the Israel Defense Forces attacked Beit Lahia in the north of Gaza, killing over 94, according to Palestinian reports. Over the previous week, Gaza's Ministry of Health reported that 343 Palestinians were killed in Gaza, before the Beit Lahia attack, and though the ministry doesn't distinguish combatants, many of the casualties are women and children, according to UN documentation. On Wednesday, U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller noted that the United States had "not seen sufficient improvement," in humanitarian aid reaching northern Gaza since the Biden administration warned Israel that the drastic lack of aid could threaten U.S. arms exports to Israel. The situation there is catastrophic, in all areas.
Some Israelis now regard the IDF actions in northern Gaza as a black flag requiring Israeli soldiers to refuse illegal orders.
Tel Aviv University legal scholar Eliav Lieblich wrote on X that if reports that the Netanyahu government was actually intending to transfer the Palestinian civilian population out of northern Gaza for political aims were true, "this is a manifestly illegal order." Lieblich was referring to the implementation of the so-called Generals' Plan, which has been widely discussed in the media as the apparent government strategy. This was bolstered by a report by Amit Segal, a top political correspondent for Israeli TV close to the prime minister.
Oxford University research fellow and political theorist Shai Agmon elaborated: "If the IDF is expelling Palestinians from the north of the [Gaza] Strip with no intention of allowing them to return, in order to conquer parts of the Strip and change the borders, through starving those who remain – this is a war crime and a manifestly illegal order. According to the instructions of the [Israeli] army, executing such an order is prohibited." Agmon told me that this instruction appears in the IDF's code of ethics and is taught regularly in training courses for officers and others.
Tomer Persico, a religious scholar at Jerusalem's Shalom Hartman Institute, made a similar case in a recent Haaretz opinion article. He quoted decades-old statements of liberal, left-wing politicians of an earlier generation saying: "The day the order for transfer is given, which is a manifestly illegal order, is also the day of refusing the order."

And at the end ...

...Raz believes there are no public sources to say how often soldiers invoke the black flag doctrine to refuse an order. Etzion relates that, anecdotally, he has heard of widespread de facto refusal (mostly via quiet deals between the refusers and their commanding officers) – the non-declarative, nonideological kind: People exhausted after 200 days on active duty, or their businesses on the verge of collapse. Haaretz's Amos Harel reports concerns within the IDF about low reporting for reserve units too.
Moreover, even the Kafr Qasem tragedy didn't end with an upstanding moral breakthrough. Those who were jailed for murder had their sentences commuted. When the most senior officer put on trial, Issachar Shadmi, was finally convicted (on a technicality only), he was fined 10 prutot. In his book about the history of the massacre, Raz found a newsletter from the time observing that a glass of soda water cost 30 prutot. He says that today's soldiers, who film themselves publicly bragging about possible criminal acts in this war, know very well that there will be no consequences.
Still, one of the biggest surprises regarding Etzion was not that a former official who served under four Israeli prime ministers would advocate refusing an illegal order, or war crimes. What was surprising was hearing Etzion relate that the reactions from family, friends, communities on- and offline were mainly supportive.
Most Israelis can't use the word "genocide." But some are finding other, more homegrown forms of protesting the moral abyss of the Gaza war.

Genocide will do fine when contemplating the current moral abyss of Israel ...

A couple of the reptiles were concerned with Jimbo. 

Off to the cornfield with them ...

Budget is Jim’s big test to show he’s up for serious reform
While Chalmers maintains the budget will still be a reform budget, will his cabinet colleagues retain any zeal for hard decisions when the landscape has changed so dramatically?
By Simon Benson
Political analyst

Conflict delivers Chalmers his own ‘banana republic’ moment
Iran War has handed Jim Chalmers chance for his own ‘banana republic’ reform
Just as Keating warned in 1986 that Australia’s high debt and reliance on natural resources exports could turn us into a ‘banana republic’, the Treasurer sees the oil crisis as a chance to be bold.
By Dennis Shanahan
National Editor

The pond personally saved those for correspondents' pleasure, but why settle for standard reptile fare when the careening Caterist is to hand to advise on the movement of flood waters in quarries and sundry other matters, including the movement of oil?

A little introductory note will come in handy thanks to Tamworth's enduring shame ... per the ABC:

...In 2020, the Coalition government announced it would take advantage of historically low fuel prices and establish a strategic fuel reserve on American soil to meet the 90-day minimum required by international agreements.
Then energy minister Angus Taylor argued it was an "extraordinary" opportunity but Labor said situating the reserve overseas would do little to minimise concerns Australia was vulnerable to international disruptions.
"The first thing about doing something stupid is not acknowledging it and continuing to do it," Mr Joyce said on Sunday.

Only Barners could note the enormous stupidity of his mob back in the day, and stupidly think that no one would notice the stupidity.

And speaking of continuing stupidity ...



The header: Labor is out of its depth in spiralling energy security crisis; A single regional conflict can disrupt energy markets and send prices surging. Yet in a world that suddenly seems more serious, Bowen responds by beclowning himself.

The caption: Minister for Climate Change and Energy of Australia Chris Bowen holds a press conference in Smithfield. Picture: Jeremy Piper

The pond happened to be in a Sydney Geely EV dealership on the weekend, and the salesman reported booming sales. 

Apparently the Gulf war has seen some, especially those with solar on the roof, finally see the charms of renewables and EV cars.

That's merely to note that there a lot out there with more nous (νοῦς if you will) than a dimwit of the cratering Caterist kind ...

In 2021, the Morrison government was accused of writing a blank cheque to stop oil refining from disappearing offshore.
“There are a number of budget measures vying for top spot as the most brazen fossil fuel subsidy,” wrote the Australia Institute’s Audrey Quick, “but paying Australia’s oil refineries an undisclosed amount to stay open is a strong contender.”
With hindsight, the modest payments then energy minister Angus Taylor offered to keep the Lytton and Geelong refineries operating is arguably the most sensible intervention in Australia’s energy sector in recent years.
They may not produce enough fuel to satisfy the country’s needs, but they will at least ensure that if things turn bad, Australia’s air force will not be waiting for the next tanker from Shanghai before it can take to the skies.
With budgetary pressures mounting, and the strategic outlook deteriorating, it might be a sensible time to scrutinise some of the recent blank cheques government has written in the hope of phasing out carbon emissions by the middle of the century.
Last year, the government announced it would spend $2.3bn to subsidise the installation of household batteries, $300m more than the Morrison government budgeted for in its 2021 Fuel Security Package.

The pond was surprised that the Caterist hadn't urged the immediate despatch of a flotilla to the gulf to sort out the unruly Persians, a gesture which would surely have been made if the liar from the Shire was still to hand in forelock-tugging mode ...Scott Morrison. Picture: Sam Ruttyn




Inevitably the Caterist saw the current kerfuffle as a way to attack renewables, which is what he always does when confronted with a solution that doesn't conform to his myopia...

As recently as two weeks ago, Chris Bowen was claiming his Cheaper Home Batteries scheme had been a runaway success. More than 250,000 home batteries had been installed with a total capacity of 6.4 gigawatt hours.
It was “a remarkable achievement”, he claimed, “better for the planet and better for the pocket”.
Whose pockets was he referring to? Not taxpayer pockets – obviously – since, as we learned in the Mid-Year Economic Forecast, the cost of the scheme blew out to $7.2bn in less than six months, triple its initial budget. It prompted swift changes to the terms of the subsidies.
The fringe benefits tax exemption for electric vehicles purchased through novated leases is also under review. It was expected to cost the budget around $1.9bn between the 2022 and 2027 financial years. Updated estimates suggest the total cost will instead reach about $5.1bn over the same period.
It is a reflection of the lack of discipline in Canberra that the ability to shovel public money out the door faster than promised is chalked up as an achievement by this government. The government has adopted the big-hearted Arthur approach to fiscal management. Budget blowouts are apparently virtuous if they are channelled into worthy causes.
As he approaches his fifth budget, Jim Chalmers has every incentive to restore some rigour to the process by weighing the costs of its programs against their actual benefits, rather their intended benefits.
As the Productivity Commission reported in August, FBT exemption on EVs is an extraordinarily expensive way to reduce carbon emissions ranging from $1000 to $20,000 a tonne. Discounting fuel excise duty on E10 petrol, for example, would produce the same benefit for roughly a tenth of a price, even if it lacks the same green kudos.

The reptiles introduced a reminder of Malware, Snowy Hydro launched its new tunnel boring machine, Monica, in early February. Source: Snowy Hydro




Speaking of boring, the Caterist cranked his denialism up to his usual eleven...

Batteries too are an inefficient and costly way to reduce emissions, even more so when they are installed at household level. Home batteries can reduce peak demand and help smooth short-term fluctuations, but they do not solve the core intermittency problem. The Australian Energy Market Operator estimates that the saving to customers across the National Energy Market from faster battery uptake is just 3 per cent.
No matter how hard you juggle the data, the inescapable conclusion is that this is low-grade public policy, poorly conceived and clumsily executed.
The budget estimates attached to the programs turn out to be utterly worthless. Ultimately, the cost depends on the take-up, and the responsible minister has a strong incentive to maximise the take-up so that he or she can boast of its “success”.
Even less attention is paid to ballooning capital costs of energy infrastructure, which are hidden off budget. Yet cost overruns and completion delays on major projects such as Snowy Hydro matter if this government is serious about intergenerational equity.
We await to see how faithfully the Treasurer follows his own brief of making savings central to May’s budget. His record is not strong. Short-term royalty windfalls from high commodity prices disappeared into spending rather than paying down debt.
Short-term revenue boost from higher inflation is likely to disappear the same way, which would be foolish, since the effect of government spending is to add further fuel to inflation.
What the government now faces is not merely a fiscal problem but a policy crisis. Having tied itself to the net-zero target, it is fast running out of workable ways of reaching its objective on any timetable.

The reptiles flung the Canavan caravan into the breach, because who doesn't want to return to the 1950s? 

New Nationals Leader Matt Canavan claims the Labor government has put Australia in a “weaker position” to handle the oil price shock as the Iran conflict escalates. “The problem is the government started wth inflation already at the highest level in the developed world,” Mr Canavan told Sky News Australia. “Because they couldn't control their own budget, they have put Australia in a much weaker position to withstand the shocks of this kind of crisis.”




Then there came a final reminder of the hive mind ... the Caterist quoting the Ughmann, who was likely quoting some other reptile, rinse and repeat, in an endless cycle of the hive mind feeding on itself ...

As Chris Ulhmann reminded us at the weekend, after 20 years of “transitioning”, Australia depends on oil, coal and gas for some 90 per cent of the energy we consume. The prospect of an extended global energy crisis exposes the net-zero project as a dangerous political distraction from the fundamental challenge of energy security. The implicit assumption was that energy security had been solved: global markets would provide whatever fuel or electricity the system required.
It was further confused by the wishful thinking that imagined that wind and solar were reliable replacements for the energy sources on which we’ve depended for the past 200 years.
The war in Ukraine has already demonstrated how dangerous that assumption can be. When the geopolitical climate shifted, the consequences were immediate. The war in Iran offers a similar warning. The global economy still relies heavily on oil shipments passing through narrow maritime chokepoints. A single regional conflict can disrupt energy markets and send prices surging. Yet in a world that suddenly seems more serious, Bowen responds by beclowning himself.
“There’s one form of energy that Vladimir Putin cannot disrupt,” he told an interviewer last week, “and that’s the flow of sun to our landmass and the flow of wind on and off our shores.”
Bowen’s reserves of flippancy are apparently inexhaustible.

And the Caterist's reserves of stupidity are definitely inexhaustible. Perhaps he could head over to King Donald's court to get himself a fresh supply every so ofen.

And that brings the pond to that most faithful relic, the always reliable columnist for the Australian Daily Zionist News, Major Mitchell...



The header: US targets Iran in strategic move to rein in its most powerful ally: China; When Donald Trump muses the US might need to take over the Strait of Hormuz, he is not just talking about protecting oil tankers from possible Iranian attacks. He is sending a coded message to China.

The caption: A worker sits amid the rubble of residential buildings that were destroyed a few days ago following the US and Israeli attack in the eastern Tehran area on March 12. Picture: Majid Saeedi/Getty Images

A couple of opening notes.

It doesn't seem to dawn on the Major that China is a major trading partner, and so what takes them down also takes Australia down.

And as for coded messages, how coded is this?

Trump calls for help from allies, China to open besieged oil route

London | US President Donald Trump has urged allies, as well as China, to send warships to help get oil flowing again through the Strait of Hormuz as he threatened to intensify attacks on Iran’s crucial Kharg Island fuel depot and port complex.
“We have already destroyed 100% of Iran’s Military capability, but it’s easy for them to send a drone or two, drop a mine, or deliver a close range missile somewhere along, or in, this Waterway, no matter how badly defeated they are,” Trump posted on his Truth Social media platform on Saturday night (Sunday AEDT).
Donald Trump claims US forces "totally obliterated" military targets on Iran's oil export hub, Kharg Island.
“Hopefully China, France, Japan, South Korea, the UK, and others, that are affected by this artificial constraint, will send Ships to the area so that the Hormuz Strait will no longer be a threat by a Nation that has been totally decapitated,” he wrote.
Iran, meanwhile, singled out the United Arab Emirates for reprisals, accusing it of helping facilitate the US strikes. It is also reportedly considering allowing the oil tankers to transit the strait if they pay for their cargo in the Chinese yuan, a move that would strike at the power of the US dollar in financial markets and the trading system.

King Donald wants China to help, while the Major gloats about China's demise? Talk about that 2D checkers the reptiles love to play.

But, if the pond might talk to King Donald, you had a complete victory in the first hour, you doofus, so why don't you just f*ck off and enjoy your triumph with your fawning minions?  (*google bot safe).

Now on with the Major, starting by being kinda funny...

It’s funny how many world leaders are finally joining the dots about Iran and its long war on Israel – dots that extend to US efforts to rein in China.
It’s really only the presence of US President Donald Trump in Israel’s latest campaign against Iran that has forced the hands of leaders from UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron and Canadian PM Mark Carney to our very own Israeli antagonist, Anthony Albanese.
All had condemned Israel’s war in Gaza to retrieve its hostages from Iran’s Hamas terror subsidiary, and all had prematurely recognised a Palestinian state, even though there had been no election for 20 years, no recognised Palestinian borders and nothing like a government.
Albanese even assured Australians last August that Palestinian National Association President Mahmoud Abbas had promised him personally by phone that he would end “pay per slay” – the grotesque scheme to pay Palestinian terrorists a stipend while they were in Israeli jails. The families of “martyrs” also receive a stipend.

It's funny how silly the Major routinely manages to sound, but that's what happens when you're a Benji sock puppet ... Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas during the 32nd Palestinian Liberation Organisation Central Council session in Ramallah last year in April. Picture: Zain JAAFAR /AFP




Of course the Major was going to be in war monger mode ...

Yet all these national leaders now support the Israeli-US war on Iran, which is really just the end of Israel’s defensive war on Hamas and Hezbollah. The UK has offered the US use of British bases, France is offering naval support to protect the Strait of Hormuz, and Carney has publicly backed the war.
Albanese is sending an RAAF E-7A Wedgetail surveillance jet, 85 personnel and air-to-air missiles. He says all will be used to help protect the United Arab Emirates.
However it’s spun, Albanese is joining the effort against Iran.
The government is conceding to the reality of US action and our historical relationship with America – a $368bn partner in the AUKUS submarine project and ANZUS ally.
Yet Labor in its private moments must see the contradiction: it is joining an effort against Iran that it criticised when that effort was led by Israel against Iran’s proxies in Gaza, Lebanon and Yemen. It is in effect admitting Iran is the danger Israel’s PM Benjamin Netanyahu always claimed it was.
Perhaps our government can see a bigger picture most media have missed. The US may be interested in a lot more than keeping nuclear weapons out of Iran’s hands and toppling a dangerous regime.
Claims at the ABC that Trump is being pushed into action by Netanyahu don’t stack up. Trump pulled Netanyahu into line several times last year.
He forced the Gaza peace deal on Netanyahu in October. He chastised Netanyahu in June for continuing with strikes on Iran after Trump had negotiated a truce and publicly declared America had destroyed Iran’s nuclear program.
Remember, Trump ordered Israel to turn around an attack that already had been launched: Netanyahu claimed the truce with Tehran had been breached on June 24 when it fired a single rocket into Israel.
Trump wrote on social media at the time: “Israel. Do not drop those bombs. If you do, it is a major violation. Bring your pilots home now.”
He followed that up with a blunt public declaration: “We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don’t know what the f.ck they’re doing.”

The reptiles introduced a snap of the King, President Donald Trump in the East Room at the White House last Thursday. Picture: Allison Robbert/AP Photo



The pond apologises, but whenever the King makes an appearance, the pond has a strange compulsion to follow with a 'toon ...



Back to the Major ...

What changed since June? Clearly, Trump is on board with the latest action. He moved two aircraft carrier battle groups into the region before the first shot was fired and may send a third.
Jerusalem Post political editor Haviv Rettig Gur called Trump’s real aims early on Substack on March 3 in a piece titled 'This Isn’t Israel’s War. It’s America’s’.
Rettig Gur argued the war was like two chess games – a local Middle East game and a much bigger global game. That global game was about Trump’s views on China.
Iran is one of Xi Jinping’s closest allies, along with Russia and North Korea. China breaks sanctions against Iranian oil exports, taking about 1.2 billion barrels a year from the Iranians, all shipped through the Strait of Hormuz.
When Trump muses the US might need to take over the Strait, he is not just talking about protecting oil tankers from possible Iranian attacks. He is sending a coded message to China, which has illegally claimed the South China Sea for decades: two can play that game.
“Iranian oil, sold cheaply because Tehran has no other buyers, has helped Beijing to build a strategic petroleum reserve exceeding a billion barrels, enough … for 100 days in the event of a naval blockade,” Gur writes.
“China’s single greatest vulnerability is the American navy's ability to interdict its energy imports … Iranian oil, flowing outside American oversight, was a direct hedge against that vulnerability. So … was Venezuela another US operation ultimately about containing China?"
The US in February also became concerned China was planning to arm Iran with hypersonic anti-ship cruise missiles capable of speeds above Mach 3. The US believed Iran was becoming “a Chinese forward base, a linchpin of the country’s naval architecture … positioned at the throat of global oil supply", according to Gur.
Israel has been targeting sites that could hit Israel. The US started with attacks on the south, targeting Iranian naval vessels, submarines, ports and anti-ship missile positions. It hit the Iranian navy HQ at Bandar Abbas and facilities at Jask, where China hoped to establish a naval base.
Zineb Riboua, researcher at the Hudson Institute, nailed it on The Australian’s opinion page on March 11.
Xi Jinping “bet a decade of foreign policy on [Ayatollah] Khamenei’s ability to survive American pressure", she writes.

Another snap of the King interrupted the Major's flow, US President Donald Trump with his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping in October at the Gimhae Air Base, located next to the Gimhae International Airport in Busan. Picture: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP



The pond is always willing to help out, and wonders whether the King has considered all the strategies available to him...




Meanwhile, the Major was still gloating about China ...

Riboua cites three problems the US Operation Epic Fury presents for China.
First, China needs “a defiant Tehran to keep Washington pinned down in the Gulf, to sustain a sanctions-proof energy corridor and … to stand as living evidence that American power had hard limits”.
Second, the American action undermines Xi’s entire narrative of declining Western power.
And finally, because China takes more than 80 per cent of all oil that Iran ships, a systemic collapse in Iran shifts the Gulf’s strategic balance “decisively towards Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, whose energy ties with the US are strengthening”.
Remember, Trump has been promoting the Abraham Accords with Israel to Saudi Arabia. Morocco, Bahrain and the UAE have already signed.
“The truly vicious part of Beijing’s situation is that Iran’s entire playbook for retaliation was designed to punish Washington, but the geography and economics of each weapon mean the damage lands on China instead,” Riboua argues.
“Iranian missiles aimed at Gulf states threaten oil infrastructure and port facilities that Chinese companies have spent billions investing in across the region.”
America is energy self-sufficient and the world’s biggest oil and gas producer.
Left-wing journalists have been arguing every American military action since the first Gulf War in 1991 was about oil. Now it really is – oil for China.

The reptiles flung in an image designed to irritate the Major ... John Lyons, the Americas editor for ABC News, is based in Washington.




But there's no way a snap of a man inclined to sensible summaries could enlighten the Major ...

ABC Americas Editor John Lyons and Global Affairs Editor Laura Tingle, who claim Netanyahu has been forcing Trump’s hand, need to get off the one-way bus lane that channels every journalistic thought towards Israel and the Jews.
If they checked mainstream Israeli media rather than Haaretz – Israel’s daily equivalent of Australia’s Green Left Weekly – they would know Israeli journalists have been asking what Israel should do if Trump finishes in Iran before Netanyahu has achieved Israel’s goals. Israeli journalists know who’s in the driver's seat, win or lose.

Give the pond Haaretz every day of the week. 

It's one of the few hopes that Israel will turn from its current sociopathic genocidal path ...

The Major might think the senseless murder of 150+ schoolgirls a strategic triumph, but count the pond out.

And so to wrap up proceedings with the immortal Rowe of the day ...




And here's a trailer, which should be enough for students to pass their herpetology exam without enduring the whole thing ...