The pond was outraged, not so much at stumbling on a 404 whereby the reptiles tried to show that they had a sensa huma - and so up to date too, dragging Bob out for show - but by the notion that the reptiles of Oz were hate media central.
On the weekend, they give up the ghost by Saturday night, and by Sunday, the Terrorists are clearly hate media central ... just look at the line-up ...
And that got the pond even madder ... the pond had looked at the Devine, a fine hater in top Chuck-hating form, and petulant Peta, an exceptional Malware loather, and yet routinely Akker Dakker gets overlooked ...
And yet Akker Dakker is one of the world's greatest climate scientists, even if he's too modest to make the claim himself ... while helping the world dream of a career at Vogue ...
You see, you don't just get climate science, you get brainwashing and Stockholm syndrome and Patty Hearst and F. Lee Bailey ... and somehow it adds up to this ...
Oh dear, where did that come from?
The pond of course wants to proceed on the level of rigorous scientific examination of the data, in the way that Akker Dakker himself explains the climate science conspiracy and hoax that will see the United Nations use the weird notion of a changing climate to introduce world government by Xmas ... though perhaps it would help the scientific discussion and the general tone if we showed guns trained on a Swedish bank, as this sort of illustration always makes clearer the implications of climate science ...
There, you see? Akker Dakker's on to the claque like an Xmas cracker...
Of course the pond can't match Akker Dakker in his rigorous use of scientific language.
Stockholm syndrome, Kool-aid, global hysteria, manipulative compromised scientists, mass suicide, Snowtown, the Beaumont children and weird crow-eaters are the sort of elegant arguments that would adorn any peer-reviewed paper ...
The pond likes to think of them as units, or boilers - count them - wherein Akker Dakker blows his coal-fired, steam-laden stack ... (don't forget to shovel a little white powder into the furnace so it can burn all the brighter).
Now as we proceed further, deeply into the science, perhaps an illustration of the most demonic form of hellish suffering ever devised by inhumanity should be shown ...
This impeccable set of arguments is based on impeccably elegant scientific research, which has seen many a compromised climate scientist abandon the field when confronted by Akker Dakker's rigorous science ...
There's little more to be said, as Akker Dakker patiently explains that the future is coal, coal, coal ...
Thank the long absent lord that this carefully considered collection of well-refined arguments makes such a potent case ... and that future generations will be able to look back and thank Akker Dakker for refuting climate science and making the planet safe for dinkum Aussie coal, oi, oi, oi ...
It's tremendously reassuring that the Donald and Akker Dakker are of like mind and like science and like status as being amongst the world's best climate scientists...
Eat your hearts out reptiles of Oz, you've a long way to go before you can claim that you're greenie-hating central ...
In March 2017 the Sierra Club reported Global Coal Plant Development is in Freefall. Apparently "The report’s findings include a 62 percent drop in new coal plant construction starts globally, a 48 percent reduction in worldwide pre-construction activity, and an 85 percent decline in new Chinese coal plant permits."
ReplyDeleteSource here: http://content.sierraclub.org/press-releases/2017/03/new-report-global-coal-plant-development-freefall-sparks-renewed-hope-climate
Yair, you can read a very short summary here: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/mar/22/coal-power-plants-green-energy-china-india
DeleteJust in case you might think the Guardian is more reliable than that bunch of wierdos at Greenpeace. :-)
Try as I might, I couldn't find any reference to Acker's $50 million power plant for Osborne naval yard (which anyway would be gas, not coal) other than the Poodle Pine's sounding off at the "unreliability" of SA's power earlier this year.
But there is recent reference to a $1.2 billion infrastructure upgrade for Osborne and surely a power supply upgrade (ASC already has power supplies there) could be included somewhere amongst that.
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/business/jobs/osborn-naval-shipyard-transformed-by-12-billion-upgrade-for-offshore-patrol-vessels-future-submarines/news-story/229c71961a3fc3e2fa9e288c00b9bbe6
But when the Dackiest Acker says "At best, the big battery [the Musk machine] may have sufficient reserves to power around 30,000 homes while repairs are made to the network." it just shows that Dacker can't read, doesn't fact check and can't understand. Sorry, DP, but I'm afraid Acks the Dacks just isn't the climate scientist he cracks himself up to be.
The battery is basically to even out the moment to moment variations of wind and solar power and also to keep the power at a fairly constant voltage and frequency (240v, 50 cycle) which is an essential component of the power supply.
So it goes, and the Terror has indeed established its primacy in the fact denying, hate making Murdochrat meritocracy.