It was the mention of that Dick spruiking the nuking of the country to save the planet that attracted the pond to Graham Readfearn's regular column Temperature Check in the Graudian ...
Reading below the dismissal of the Dick's thoughts, the pond came across an item that made the pond realise it had been neglecting its duties.
The new format at the lizard Oz had led to the pond overlooking a vital bit of Riddster/Lloydie of the Amazon lore...
The Great Barrier Reef has just been through what many scientists fear will be its most widespread and severe mass coral bleaching event – and a fifth in just eight years – driven by the inevitable rise in ocean temperatures from burning fossil fuels.
After being hit by two cyclones and then plumes of sediment flowing out over near-shore corals after major floods in north Queensland, according to the Australian Institute of Marine Science (Aims), extreme levels of heat-driven bleaching covered for the first time all three regions of the reef this summer.
With all that, you would need to work pretty hard to find a way to suggest that there’s actually very little to worry about.
But the Australian newspaper managed that task at the weekend with an article claiming new government data showed the reef remained resilient, with near-record levels of coral cover.
It had been a good week for the reef, the story said, with Unesco deciding against recommending the natural wonder should be placed on a list of world heritage sites in danger, and then Aims publishing “final survey results” showing “hard coral cover has held steady at the record-breaking levels of the past two years across the entire reef system.”
The reef, wrote the paper’s environment editor, Graham Lloyd, “appears to be largely going about its business as usual”.
The story included five graphs, each marked with a 2024 end data point, appearing to show high levels of coral cover from five of 11 sectors of the reef covered by Aims.
But three of those five sectors were actually surveyed well before this summer’s bleaching event began.
The Capricorn sector in the southern region of the reef was surveyed between September and October 2023, the Lizard island sector in the north was surveyed between November 2023 and early February 2024, and Cairns, in the central region, was also surveyed in 2023, between August and September.
Reports of bleaching did not start to emerge until late February and the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority did not officially declare a mass bleaching was taking place until 8 March.
Prof Tracy Ainsworth, a coral scientist at UNSW, said it can be weeks or months, depending on the species and the severity of heat stress, before the fate of corals after bleaching can be known.
“To determine mortality of corals associated with bleaching, surveys conducted in the weeks to months after the peak of heat stress are necessary to assess mortality from bleaching,” she said.
The pond was mortified, caught out, derelict in duty, and knew that even though it was belated, it somehow had to remedy the situation.
Clearly the pond couldn't replicate the splendid interactive deployed by Lloydie of the Amazon...
But the pond could link to AIMS and its reef map without breaking its strict 'no links to Chairman Emeritus's shekels for stories' rule ... and the pond could provide the text for diligent study...
Mention of Quigley reminded the pond of that second bit in the Readfearn piece ...
Lloyd interviewed Dr Peter Ridd, a marine physicist who has long-claimed the reef is not facing a crisis and who has also signed a declaration that “CO2 is plant food” and that there is no climate emergency.
Ridd claimed research had shown that corals could deal with rising temperatures by swapping their symbiont algae for more tolerant versions. When corals bleach, they seperate from the algae that lives in their tissues and provides much of their nutrients and colour.
“It is the reason that, even if there is to be a large rise in temperature due to CO2, corals are one of the best able to adapt and survive – all they need to do is swap the symbionts,” Ridd claimed.
But Dr Kate Quigley, who was also interviewed by Lloyd and who has researched the switching phenomena, says only some corals studied had this ability.
She said: “So some corals can withstand a bit of heat now, but this will likely be swamped given increased warming. Those species without these mechanisms will suffer the most first.”
She said rather than corals being “one of the best able to adapt and survive”, she said the opposite was true.
Quigley, a molecular ecologist specialising in corals at James Cook University, said: “That is why we are seeing reefs suffer globally. They are the canaries in the coalmine because they already sit very close to their thermal limits naturally. Small increases in warming have already pushed reefs to the limit.”
Research of previous bleaching events on the reef had shown that large drops in coral cover occurred once the amount of corals bleached on individual reefs went beyond 30%.
When government scientists carried out aerial surveys of this summer’s bleaching, they found 792 of 1,080 reefs had bleached. Half of those affected reefs saw bleaching of at least 30% and some 39% had 60% or more of corals bleaching.
Quigley said: “Although the official reports of the extent of impact are not yet complete, this can not be described as the ingredients for business as usual.”
Man in a Top Hat balances the books after he finds $500m down the back of the surplus couch.
ReplyDeleteBy giving $500m to maaaates.
Filter feeders.
Now that we are all relaxed about the future of 'The Reef', the Sydney Institute has something to help you sleep. Seems that yesterday it hosted talks by the Oscillating Fan, and Ms Ton-yee-nee, on something like the state of Australian politics. Almost an hour all up, including (no doubt sparkling) intro by our modern Polonius. No - no sense of duty could persuade me to watch it on behalf of others who come here; just thought you might be amused that such star-rated shows are still on offer. As of 10 minutes ago, it had gleaned 510 views on 'YouTube'. This is all ye know on earth, and all ye need know.
ReplyDeleteNothing is ever simple and linear is it; not coral reefs nor human politics. But they all end up the same: death and destruction over long timeframes.
DeleteHi Dorothy,
ReplyDeleteI think I’ve become a Graham Lloyd denialist.
He seemed a credible enough journalist at the beginning with claims he was an “Environmental Editor” but as time has gone on I find I can’t believe he is a real thing.
His byline photo never gets upgraded. There are no sightings of him anywhere in Australia but there are rumours he’s in Cancun or somewhere in South America.
Then it appears he goes by a totally different moniker - Efrem.
https://www.crikey.com.au/2015/06/25/the-secret-life-of-graham-efrem-lloyd-oz-environment-editors-greenie-double-life/
Maybe Graham/Efrem has sold the whole “Graham Lloyd - Environmental Editor” persona to NewsCorpse and they just run any old bullshit under his name.
Meanwhile the real Graham/Efrem is doing the good stuff hugging capybaras and finding his way to a “Seperate Reality”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Separate_Reality
" just run any old bullshit under his name" - but that is exactly what the reptile press does for all of its regular contributors.
DeleteAnyway, thanks for the reminder of the existence of Castaneda/Don Juan - it's so easy for so many things just to fade into one's many yesterdays.
Oh, I thought I vaguely remembered that name: Efrem Zimbalist boc. Now why would Lloydie want to use that nom ?
Delete