The pond can't even begin to remember when prattling Polonius became a fixture for the pond's Sunday meditation.
Back in its heyday, long ago, perhaps before time began, there were Pellists and angry Sydney Anglicans and a chance for men to snag complimentary women, but the Jensensists slowly faded from sight and so did the Pellists.
Only Polonius, always raging at the ABC, was left standing.
But to what avail? The fastidious pedant who inevitably fucks up his pedantry has had nothing new to say for years, and never had any insights to offer, let alone fresh ones ...
Even worse, he repeats himself so often that he makes dullards like the Bjorn-again one seem like fonts of originality ...
All that's by way of warning, and let no reader say they haven't been fully and properly warned ...
Sure, there's sublime comedy right there, with Polonius touting Tucker and Sean and Laura as serious debaters ...
Tucker Carlson appears to be made of Teflon. Fox News' top-rated host has been repeatedly accused of anti-immigrant and racist comments, which have cost his political opinion show many of its major advertisers. Yet Carlson endures in his prime-time slot.
Carlson even attacked his own network's chief news anchor on the air, with no real consequences. That anchor, Shepard Smith, quit mid-contract shortly after Carlson went after him.
Now comes the claim that you can't expect to literally believe the words that come out of Carlson's mouth. And that assertion is not coming from Carlson's critics. It's being made by a federal judge in the Southern District of New York and by Fox News's own lawyers in defending Carlson against accusations of slander. It worked, by the way.
Just read U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion, leaning heavily on the arguments of Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should hen inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "She wrote: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."
Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable."
Jump cut:
In Carlson's defense, Fox's attorneys, from Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, noted that meeting the standard of "actual malice" requires more than just showing someone should have researched or investigated a subject before popping off, thanks to U.S. Supreme Court rulings.
The Fox team's legal briefs compared Carlson's show to radio talk-show programs hosted by ex-MSNBC and Fox Business star Don Imus, who won a case more than two decades ago because an appellate court ruled that "the complained of statements would not have been taken by reasonable listeners as factual pronouncements but simply as instances in which the defendant radio hosts had expressed their views over the air in the crude and hyperbolic manner that has, over the years, become their verbal stock in trade."
In sum, the Fox News lawyers mocked the legal case made by McDougal's legal team. She alleged "a reasonable viewer of ordinary intelligence listening or watching the show ... would conclude that [she] is a criminal who extorted Trump for money" and that "the statements about [her] were fact."
"Context makes plain," Fox's lawyers wrote, "that the reasonable viewer would do no such thing."
And so on at NPR here ...
Everybody not suffering from Polonial delusion recognises that Faux Noise is full of performative entertainers who don't give a flying fuck about facts, bloviating away so they can produce an anger fest ... much, in the same way as Polonius himself does about the ABC, except that as a tired old pedant, he lacks the skill set ... which is why even The Insiders thought it needed a refresh ...
But credit to the old coot, still plugging away regardless ...
The pond wins another bet ... because Polonius has always been big on blather about conservative free culture ...
Recently the pond dug up this example from the lizard Oz on 17th December 2021 ...
But the reality is Polonius has had this bee in his bonnet for yonks. There are plenty of recent examples ...
But here he is back on May 7th 2013 when he was scribbling for the then Fairfax ...
Ah back then it was a conservative-free zone, rather than a conservative-free-zone, so at least something has changed ... a bonus hyphen.
And that's why the pond's regular response is also wreathed in the mysteries of time ...
That's dated by First Dog to April 10th, 2008! No wonder the pond has dim memories of when it all began, having dug out that Pooter joke time and again ...
And that's just the first layer of the dig. Who knows, we might end up in the upper Pleistocene period ... and yet still the dinosaur remains true to his ways ...
Oh the poor doddering old fart, trapped not so much in the reptile hive mind, as in a hive of his own making ...
It's a pitiful spectacle, and so the pond turned to our Gracie for a female view, and was truly alarmed ... because once again she seemed to have strayed into the dark side ...
Sheesh, Gracie, our speaking in tongues rapture man has been right on the ball ...
Aren't thoughts and prayers enough? What, you want him to hold a hose?
Hmm, that reminds the pond of the gum out the front, already shedding branches and ripe for a fall, just like the one a few doors down, a really spectacular gum that fell to the ground in spectacular style, though luckily the only damage down was to a fence and power lines ...
Still, we all know the correct pose ... calm acceptance ...
And so to a final few words from our Gracie ...
Dearie me, wouldn't it be simpler just to keep the inaction going ...
And so to Dame Slap.
The pond hummed and hawed about putting Dame Slap into an already bulky post, but figured what the hell, tourjours gai, and if it were to be done, better that it were done quickly.
The pond could have hived off Dame Slap to a late arvo slot, but better to finish it now.
It's long and tedious, but anyone wanting to drop out can try to leave Hotel Dame Slap ... (first explain why you did leave that dark, dim desert highway).
It's also suitably weird, and the pond thought it might continue today's tradition of dropping in some Goldings to lighten the mood, though they might be irrelevant to Dame Slap's words ...
You see, Dame Slap is again at war with the sisterhood and all that jazz, and while the pond isn't a card-carrying member of the sisterhood, it does take a warped delight in examining Dame Slap's deeply neurotic, deeply Freudian fears and phobias ...
Actually if the pond wanted to present Dame Slap, it would focus on her deep and abiding love of pussy gropers ... just in the interests of logic, balance and fairness, and certainly not to pander to a stereotype of an irrational blonde bimbo driven by an overwhelming lust for an authoritarian father figure ...
That surely puts the trudging Tudge in the shade, but Dame Slap is all about defending a singularly useless dropkick of the fudging Trudge kind ... which is why the reptiles stuck in a click bait video, carefully neutered by the pond..
Oh fuck, not the dog botherer hermetically sealed into the reptile environment.
Now back to the cat fight ...
The pond realises that Dame Slap was trying to sound now and hip by linking mansplaining and ghosting, but truth to tell, ghosting embraces all genders ... but speaking of heartfelt liberalism's foundational values, how about a hair wash?
You know, this Golding trick might just help the pond get to the end of the cat fight ... as Dame Slap naturally joins Polonius in having a go at the ABC ... because two head-kicking droogs are always better than one ...
I said, smiling very wide and droogie: ‘Well, if it isn’t fat stinking billygoat ABC in poison. How art thou, thou globby bottle of cheap stinking chip-oil? Come and get one in the yarbles, if you have any yarbles, you eunuch jelly, thou.’ And then we started.
And so she donned her boots and started ...
So many victims, so much suffering, and yet how easy to forget that the trudging Tudge was a comically inept minister ...
More here but have an old infallible Pope just for the lark ...
The reptiles must have realised Dame Slap was wearing thin, so they flung in a click bait video as a distraction ...
At this point the pond realised that it was running out of Dame Slap but still had some Goldings to hand ...
Luckily Dame Slap provided a final place holder ... and what do you know, the dear old chook took a shot at Twitter ... but let's be fair, even a dead clock gets it right every so often ...
There's nothing like a hack Krogered columnist telling medical experts to bugger off, while no doubt rushing in to have an ingrown toenail taken care of ... but that's the way Twitter talk is full of kneejerk, absurdist commentary, where the likes of Dame Slap go not to think ... talk about regressive madness of the most ludicrous kind ...
And with the righteous blather finally at an end, a chance to stick in a couple more old Goldings in what has been something of a Golding fest ...
Here we go, from Polonius: "It is difficult to think of any political, social, economic or environmental matter on which the two [Kelly and Karvelas] would disagree. Likewise it's hard to imagine Cassidy would differ with them ..." And that's because they have informed, intelligent (well, mostly) viewpoints whereas you, Polonous, only have wingnut crap to spout.
ReplyDeleteWhich is the main reason the ABC doesn't have a lot of so-called "conservatives" on air. So when Polonius spruiks that "The essential problem with the public broadcaster is that it's effectively a staff collective that's run by journalists..." and then follows up with "It's only management that can change the ABC's conservative-free zone culture." what he obviously means is that "management" will have to sack a bunch of the current "green-left" journalists and replace them by IPA graduates and ex-Foxians.
And wouldn't that just be a joy. Besides, both "green-left" and "conservative" actually cover quite a range of beliefs and viewpoints. Is Polonius saying that "management" would have to employ journalists covering the whole range of both ? Or is it just a question of picking out his favourites ?
Interesting:
DeleteStudy: Political Opponents are More Stupid than Evil
https://skepchick.org/2022/03/study-political-opponents-are-more-stupid-than-evil/
I tend to go more for 'stupid and heartless' rather than 'evil', especially given that "subjective experience" is rated more highly than "objective facts" because so-called "facts" can be lies or just plain incorrect, but "feelings" are real and incontrovertible.
At something of a tangent - but for a good perspective on the aftermath of the floods in Grantham - the ABC (at least in Queeensland) has this item today -
ReplyDeletehttps://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-13/grantham-land-swap-a-model-for-future/100902758?utm_campaign=abc_news_web&utm_content=link&utm_medium=content_shared&utm_source=abc_news_web
- that is the link they offer to copy - but, if that doesn't work, a search in the ABC news site should find it.
A better perspective than the futile flailing of Cater and Jones, following their version of journalism that there must be someone to blame for whatever happens. The good story is that the local people, through their Council, realised that these 'events' were, if anything, more likely in future - so do something about it.
Alas, my experience tells me that, in other towns, there will always be a Councillor Blenkinsop, proclaiming that 'That is all very well there, but it doesn't apply here!'
The link worked for the pond, Chadders ...with that land swap an interesting follow-up:
Delete...While the focus during the land swap in Grantham stayed very much on the practical workings of moving a town, Tony Matthews, urban and environmental planner at Griffith University, says Grantham holds celebrity status in the academic world.
"The people of Grantham probably didn't realise at the time, but what they were living through was a very major historical moment globally," he said.
"It is still referenced regularly in international literature for what happened there."...
Yes, and it's probably noted somewhere in records of court proceedings involving the loons you mentioned ...
Now isn't it just a pity that with nearly 8 billion of us homo saps saps there isn't nearly enough safe and viable land to 'swap' everybody into. Nor to also include their pets and wild life and so forth.
DeleteAnybody for an acre or two in the Gobi desert somewhere ?
So, Slappy inquires: "...they [accusing women] play a perilous game of pandering to a stereotype where women are seen as overly emotional, irrational, uninterested in logic, balance, fairness. Is that how they want to present women ?"
ReplyDeleteNo, I reckon they'd much rather deal with real women like this:
‘The LNP are feeling threatened’: the growing ambition of independents challenging Coalition MPs
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/mar/13/the-lnp-are-feeling-threatened-the-growing-ambition-of-independents-challenging-coalition-mps
Note 18 out of the 20 are women.
But hey, surely even the Slappy can recall that "damned whores or God's police" is the way all women have been judged by those ultra unemotional, rational, interested in logic, balance and fairness types called 'males' for millennia. Oh yes, and ever obligingly 'complementary' (and 'complimentary') too.
Then she pushes this: "As Fukuyama says, 'Progressives have shown themselves willing to limit free speech and due process in the name of social justice." Which retrogressives such as Fukuyama and Slappy have never, ever done - they'd rather die first, right ? Besides, what does Fukuyama (and Slappy) mean by "social justice" as used here ?
Our Gracie was a bit into special pleading today, wasn't she. So she reckons that: "Australians live in a highly regulated, highly taxed, high-cost environment." Yeah ? Compared to where ? "Whether federal, state or local, government dictates what type of land we are allowed to live on, how many dwellings that land can have, and the type and size of home built." And aren't we glad that it's so ? Or are we dedicated, in our inner souls, to a world of residential anarchy ? Build anything anywhere, and then expect the taxpayer to cough up for government supplied roads, public transport, electricity and gas, water, sewerage, and sundry other public facilities, eg garbage collectors, street lights, police, SES, fire brigade, schools, hospitals, ambulance services etc etc. Oh, and NBN.
ReplyDeleteSounds a lot like "very mindlessly selfish" to me. After all, in relation to the 'Grantham swap' we had this: "Dr Matthews says urban planners are starting to consider "radical" solutions to help people living in flood zones. 'Choosing a place to live in Australia is about avoiding a multitude of hazards,' he said." And it sure is.
As a small aside, I hadn't thought this through, had you:
ReplyDeleteIt’s ‘Ukraine,’ not ‘the Ukraine’ – here’s why
https://theconversation.com/its-ukraine-not-the-ukraine-heres-why-178748
PS DP:
ReplyDeleteFive Loons Rescued on Lake Champlain
https://www.adirondackalmanack.com/2022/03/five-loons-rescued-on-lake-champlain.html
:)³ thank the long absent lord someone's thinking of the loons. As for Ukraine, the pond had already been given that lecture, and reminded of the way that Sir Larry used to pronounce it in the TV series The World at War, full ponce rep with heavy emphasis: Uuukkkraaynnne
Delete