Wednesday, August 18, 2021

In which the pond gives up and indulges in critical blonde theory, before turning to the swishing Switzer ...

 

 

The pond knew that today was going to be difficult, but like an American withdrawal, didn't realise how difficult ...

Grim discordant humour? Well it's not the same as falling from a plane, but cop this lot ...

 

 
 
 
Switzer? Could the pond go as low as that?
 
What about the virus? Perhaps the pond could get its shot there?

 
 

 

No, there's Fergo, the poor person's Killer Creighton, doing a bit of standard comrade Dan bashing, because, people, allow the pond to assure you that Gladys' do and die approach still leaves hope, nay ecstasy, in its wake ... we've never had it so good in cockroach land, at least in the bunker in Surry Hills?

Forget about comrade Dan, we're still living with the reptiles' and Gladys' gold standard, and how good is that?

Send in the troops, the pond says, and then feels the urge to move along.

What about the top of the page then?

 


 


We can't save them all, says the rapture man?




Indeed, indeed, who would hold a prose. Well we can't save them all, and it seems pointless to save a noun without a verb, and there you go, once upon a time handy translators and helpers ...

But at least there was a poignant pictorial juxtaposition between the Taliban, and the Talibanish Dame Slap ...

 


 

 

... and having provided clear evidence of its workings, the pond had nowhere else to go ...




 

First, please allow the pond to note where Dame Slap is starting from ...

 




Ah yes, that feels about right ... now how about a bit of sublime Dame Slap logic to kick things off with a bang? Which is to say, logic has nothing to do with it, so much as argumentum ad absurdum ...


 

Indeed, indeed, important questions. Are they aware of Australia's singular achievements in fair minded equality for all?

 

 


 

There'll certainly be no black armbands here, especially not from a privileged blonde scribbling furiously from her planet above the Faraway tree ...



 
 
Solidly argued. This fad notion that somehow blondes might be equal to blacks is simply insulting ... there's been a long and proud tradition in this country asserting the suffering of blondes at the hands of ill-tempered prejudice and bigotry ...
 




 
And so to the final gobbet of ever-rising indignation at the outlandish demands of pesky, difficult, never satisfied blacks ...
 
 

 

Yes, it's all pretty much done and dusted. Never mind those who turned their back on the Ruddster on the day, never mind the many and sundry failures and errors, the bigotry and posturing, we're all right Jack (and Jill, though really you should never grow up to be IPA chairman), and there's absolutely no institutionalized racism in this country ... though come to think of it, the pond regrets using up that Wilcox cartoon the other day, because it would have come in handy today.

Oh what the heck ...




... and here's a bonus ...




 

And so, for another bonus, and with a deep sigh, it's on to the lesser bromancer, the swishing Switzer ...

 

 
 
 
Not change a thing? Not even the manner of the retreat?
 
It took the reptiles a little while to reach this position.
 
Yesterday there were some that thought a few things might have been changed for the better, not least the dismal manner and method of the retreat and surrender ...
 
 
 

 
 
Panicked incoherence? Nope, the swishing Switzer wouldn't change a thing. Lo, he looked at what was happening, and it was all good and inevitable and done and dusted ...
 
 

 

Say what? Why there's absolutely no comparison, and it certainly hasn't become a widely shared meme, one that will live on for a long time in the collective memory ...

 

 


 

Hard to pick which is which ... perhaps a date?

 

 


 

And as for the pathetic wretches who want to flee the country, what a cowardly bunch they are. Waiter, could we have the total on the tape?

 

 


 

 

Hmm, that seems about right.

Rating one American service member as being roughly equivalent to 100 tribal and medieval villagers, primitive folks of not much use in the world, it will be seen that the human cost for the US far exceeds the casualties suffered by the people of Afghanistan ...

Now let's continue putting the best gloss on things, in a way only a swishing Switzer can manage ...



 

But what if you have clueless advisors, who chop and change in the breeze? You know the sort ...

 


 

 

And then there was Switzer swishing away in the WSJ on 6th July 2021, under the header Nixon Warned About U. S. Decline, half a century ago, he foretold the loss of American pre-eminence.

Well Nixon was an expert on how to lose pre-eminence, no doubt about it, and being something of a Nixonian himself, the Switzer was on fire with insights:

The U.S. has been through dark times before—and in living memory. Fifty years ago this week, President Richard Nixon spoke frankly about America’s doldrums in a speech that didn’t get enough attention from the media at the time or historians since. On July 6, 1971, the 37th president addressed senior midwestern media executives in Kansas City, Mo., amid racial unrest, campus agitation and antiwar protests.
The columns of the National Archives Building in Washington reminded Nixon of ancient fallen empires. “I think of what happened to Greece and Rome, and you see what is left—only the pillars. What has happened, of course, is that the great civilizations of the past, as they have become wealthy, as they have lost their will to live, to improve, they then have become subject to decadence that eventually destroys the civilization.” Nixon’s lament: “The United States is now reaching that period.”
America, he said, needed to find the “moral and spiritual strength” to shape the emerging post-Vietnam era. Counterculture revolutionaries wanted to define America as “an ugly country.” Nixon urged his countrymen to reject “negativism” and “defeatism” and concentrate on building a nation that was “healthy” both morally and physically.
“The United States no longer is in the position of complete pre-eminence or predominance,” he said, because “we now face a situation where four other powers”—the Soviet Union, Western Europe, Japan and China—“have the ability to challenge us on every front.” Yet this “can be a constructive thing.” A few months later, he told Time magazine: “I think it will be a safer world and a better world if we have a strong, healthy United States, Europe, Soviet Union, China, Japan, each balancing the other.”
Here was the old Cold Warrior calling on fellow citizens to adapt to decline in a more plural international environment. He wanted to adopt policies that would smooth the path of a more limited U.S. role in foreign affairs: détente with the Soviets, abandonment of Bretton-Woods dollar-gold link, and the opening to China. As Nixon spoke, national security adviser Henry Kissinger was secretly en route to Beijing to plan the first presidential visit to China.
Nixon’s predictions about the end of U.S. global pre-eminence proved to be wrong, or so it seemed in the five years before his death in 1994. The Soviet Union collapsed and the U.S. enjoyed what Charles Krauthammer called “the unipolar moment.” Late in life, Nixon wrote books arguing that the U.S. would dominate the world scene and its will would shape the new era. “Because we are the last remaining superpower,” he declared in uncharacteristically sweeping terms, “no crisis is irrelevant to our interests.”
Today China is rising, Russia is resurgent, and the U.S. is again consumed by division and self-doubt. Will the U.S. disprove the forecasts of decline again, or was Nixon ahead of his time?
Mr. Switzer is executive director of the Centre for Independent Studies in Sydney and a presenter at the Australian Broadcasting Corp.

 

Splendid stuff, and what good news about China. You see, the US might have been done down by primitive medievalists and tribal types, but that means they're ready to tackle the Chinese, a wretched mob who aren't even up to primitive medieval, tribal standards, and so can be given a sound thrashing, and made to like it ...

 

 


 

Oh it's Asia where it's all happening, is it? A good thing the pond doesn't have to answer the trick question as to whether Afghanistan is in Asia or the middle east, and perhaps mistakenly propose that Afghanistan is in south central Asia. 

Instead a quick survey of the headlines will prove the swishing Switzer is right on the money ...

 

 



 

Yes, there's no doubt the managing of the retreat has done wonders for the US image abroad, and has put it in a very strong position to focus on China ... and if you believe all that, the pond has got a barely used Switzer, left over from RN, to sell you ...

And in keeping with the Switzer theme for the day, a message to medievalists and tribalists everywhere, courtesy the immortal Rowe, with more Rowe here ...

 





9 comments:

  1. Hi Dorothy,

    I wonder how this story will pan out?

    https://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/may/31/mes-aynak-afghanistan-buddhist-treasure

    https://tricycle.org/trikedaily/mes-aynak/

    DiddyWrote

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah well, you can't make the future without breaking the past, DW.

      Delete
    2. Might I suggest that Rio Tinto have the skillset to handle such a delicate site. Probably no need to even hunt down a suitably pliable person to represent the traditional owners.

      Delete
    3. Hi BF,

      With Rio Tinto they are professional enough to have ensured that they have set the charges before informing the traditional owners of the imminent detonation.

      Too dangerous to remove them at this late stage. Sadly.

      DW

      Delete
  2. Dame Slap on the warpath about another American obsession. Given that most of her handwringing involves a list premasticated far-right gobbets from the land of the free it might make sense for her to pack up and join the other weird sisters and the Killer on the other side of the Pacific.

    Sorry JM, hate to have you think we are exporting our excess idiots!

    So, some culture warrior decided a fifty year old theory that hardly anyone had ever heard of could provide another front in the ongoing war. Dame Slap imports it with hardly any changes, trawls up an example that doesn't seem much different to the normal run of corporate tosh (does anyone remember the Myers-Briggs testing) and tries to link it in some way to Australia.

    Just to provide some comic relief, this seems to pull together some of the treads of modern conservatism - entitlement, indifference and cluelessness.

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/aug/17/dominic-raab-news-foreign-secretary-taliban-kabul

    "Forgive me for ascending into the rarefied argot of diplomatese, but the bed has been comprehensively shat by parties from the Home Office to the US State Department, and most significantly by the American president, Joe Biden."

    Or, more simply "for others, it will consist of declaring “no one could have predicted this” about a thing that was predicted by people.". This thought comes to me every day.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh now that's a real 'blast from the past', Bef: Myers-Briggs. A real piece of arrant nonsense that certainly was/is - does anybody still use it ? Having been retired for a while now, I don't know whether some of those old brain-farts have truly faded away or it's that these days I'm just nowhere where they are still 'worshipped'.

      The thing about Slappy and CRT though is that the actual substance of reptile/wingnut "talking points" is that they are just that - only taken seriously enough to blame the "woke left" for. Slappy couldn't care less what American Express does and whether it costs any of the "owners" a few bucks of profit revenue.

      I do have to defend Joe Biden just a little, though; his single major fault was to apparently believe that something crafted by the "master dealmaker" was actually a workable deal. Biden is a bit childish in many respects and he probably believed the gross lies that the American military and diplomats were telling him about Afghanistan. And he's surely too simple-minded to recall that they'd told the same lies about Vietnam and Iraq. Over and over and over.

      But hey, who remembers the American invasion of the Philippines back in 1899 and how the American occupation of the Philippines lasted until 1946. So its not as though this kind of thing isn't part of regular American history.

      Delete
    2. I had a brush with Myers-Briggs in a job interview many years ago. It worked out alright in the end, more due to luck than good management, but it did demonstrate you could sell anything to a generalist manager.

      The candidates were a small group who knew each other quite well and the test results often suggested the dead opposite of the individuals' capabilities and personality types. Very scary to be subjected to a witch trial where no one understands the criteria or reasoning.

      I always feel a bit uneasy about quoting a guy who was a Tory Minister but I do recall Rory Stewart making a few observations in the last couple of decades that rang true. I cannot trawl it up at the moment but I'm sure he stated that the Russian specialists knew what would happen if they went into Afghanistan but they did it anyway and the Americans would have had the same advice but also chose to ignore it.

      This gives some idea of how the culture develops and who gets listened to and who gets ignored

      https://www.reuters.com/article/idUS362896257120110921

      "The majority of students did not enjoy the detail about the specifics of Afghanistan from the six fellows who had spent years on the ground there. They preferred hearing from the public figures who had served in Washington. The articulacy, focus, and clear itemized strategies of these senior officials impressed the students, who were apparently not troubled by the officials’ lack of experience on the ground."

      There should be some lessons learned but history suggests that wont be the case and we will be here again in the near future.

      Delete
    3. Glad you survived your close encounter of the third kind with the alien Myers-Briggsians. Now I'm trying hard to remember a book I read maybe 40+ years ago - very popular at the time - and what I mostly remember was a description of a WWI battle with the (French) general in his tent with his officers and subalterns giving orders such as "advance here" (pointing to an enlarged map) and "retreat there" and not having a clue as to what was really going on until the German bullets started ripping through his tent. ('Clochemerle' by Gabriel Chevallier if you're interested).

      And now I look at the carryings on of our very own 'French generals' (Morrison, Albanese and their ilk) who also spend a lifetime ordering "advance here" and "retreat there" and never seem to have any effective contact with a broad reality. And Trump and Biden in the USA and Johnson in the UK and so on.

      And just an abstract of a paper titled "Win–win denial: The psychological underpinnings of zero-sum thinking." which contained the following: "Several potential psychological mechanisms underlying win–win denial are considered, with the most important influences being mercantilist theories of value (confusing wealth for money) and theory of mind limits (failing to observe that people do not arbitrarily enter exchanges). We argue that these results have widespread implications for politics and society."

      Couldn't agree more [ https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2021-73979-001 ]

      So "mercantilist theories" and "theories of mind limits" are with us, always and everywhere.

      But I do wonder, if Biden-his-time had actually ignored the 'Trump-Taliban "deal"' and just let things smoulder away in Afghanistan for another 8 years (assuming he lasts to be re-elected) whether things wouldn't just have gone on going on as they have been for the preceding decade or so. What was his bloody hurry ?

      Delete
  3. Was it Polonius who said Australia did better than NZ?

    https://mobile.twitter.com/murraysewerrat/status/1427739327061102592

    ReplyDelete

Comments older than two days are moderated and there will be a delay in publishing them.