Looking at that Polonial splash, the pond realised that its worst fears had come true. It was all the fault of the ABC ...
But then through the mists of dementia and senility, the pond drew a ray of sunshine and comfort. In the land of prattling Polonius, it was always the fault of the dastardly ABC. Always had been, always is, always will be ... and knowing that, the pond could relax, go with the Polonial flow, which happened to be standard reptile fodder, an assault on dastardly comrade Dan, and a pumping up of the volume for kindly Josh and Scotty the marketing whizz ...
Before getting going on the usual comrade Dan guff, could the pond just pause to welcome back the venerable Meade, fermenting away at the Graudian. Tory didn't quite cut it, preferring a blunt instrument to a scalpel, whereas the fermented Meade offers a taste of bemused bewilderment, as here with this sample featuring Sky News and bully boy Clennell ...
... Unlike Credlin, who criticised Victorian premier Daniel Andrews for subjecting Melbourne to the “longest and hardest lockdowns in the world”, Clennell demanded to know why Berejiklian didn’t lock Sydney down longer and harder.
“When are you going to acknowledge it is time to lock it down harder to get rid of this thing?” he asked.
Coming on the back of the wider News Corp rhetoric of Andrews as “Dictator Dan” who was crippling the state’s economy, it was quite the backflip.
Well Polonius isn't going to hear any heretical talk about backflips ... not when the bloody ABC is ruining everything by asking tough questions and giving comrade Dan a free ride ...
Now as an aside, Polonius arguing whether SloMo was acting as premier or prime minister for NSW is a surreal example of the pedantic one's penchant for pompous absurdity ... but back to the many thought crimes of the ABC ...
As part of the Polonial church service in worship of SloMo's mob, the reptiles decided they'd introduce a distraction in the form of a talking Josh ...
The pond quickly turned it into a useless screen cap and gave it the presence and prominence it deserved ...
Feeling good about that adjustment to the reptile presentation, the pond could press on in good heart to learn more about the shocking, wilful depravity of the ABC ...
The pond just knew Polonius couldn't resist a spot of history, what with the toffs doing such a splendid job during the great depression ...
Smith's Weekly here, or here for this one ...
Or put it another way ...
And what's why the pond could move on to the last Polonial gobbet in good spirits, because if the ABC does press releases for comrade Dan, Polonius knows how to up the press release ante to the level of servile boot-licking when it comes to SloMo's mob ...
Yes, the coalition government doesn't need to berate the ABC and comrade Dan ... that mob can leave that job to Polonius and get on with the business of fucking up the response to the pandemic, and so life balances itself ...
Speaking of the pandemic, the pond decided it couldn't go with the dog botherer, who was at one point elevated to the top of the page and placed next to the reptile "god" known as "Ned" ...
Grytpype-Thynne: Oh, Neddie.
Seagoon: Curses, I'm spotted.
Grytpype-Thynne: Why are you wearing that leopard-skin?
Seagoon: So that's why I'm spotted.
It'd be best for the country if the NSW lockdown failed?
Fuck the dog botherer, and while the pond is at it, fuck all the horses he rode in on.
The pond has little time for fool's gold standard Gladys, but the pond has no wish to urge failure on her. That way lies fucking madness, and much suffering for the unvaccinated mob.
If the pond had one wish after that opening line, it was that the dog botherer cop a bloody good dose of the virus, preferably without a vaccine to hand ...
And so the pond moved on from the line that we had to destroy the village to save it, pausing only to note another couple of jolly notes in the Weekly Beast ...
The podcast world was rocked by the news this week that Paul Kelly, the eminence grise of political journalism, is launching a podcast. With elegant simplicity the podcast was named Paul Kelly: Columns. Because that’s exactly what it is: the 73-year-old journalist reading his columns aloud.
As if that wasn’t enough to take in, the piece announcing the move contained the remarkable claim that Kelly is so “surprising” with his insights he even surprises himself.
“If you think you know what Paul Kelly is likely to write on a certain topic, you’re probably wrong,” the Oz executive editor Claire Harvey wrote.
“The Australian’s editor-at-large, the guru of national affairs, has devoted his 50 years at the heart of political journalism to surprising the reader – and himself – with insights even he doesn’t see coming.”
He reads his column out loud? Narcissism isn't dead ... and how long before "Ned's" venture joins the knewz?
Some unkind observers believe the podcast, read in Kelly’s distinctive tone, might also be a cure for insomnia, much like the BBC’s Shipping Forecast, which has been used by Britons as a sleep aid for decades.
Actually the pond prefers the BBC's world service reading of British soccer scores, much loved by comedians of a certain age, but to each his own, and then came this ...
“I then had a partner who didn’t want to be involved in the campaign at all so to soften my image I did two things,” Kelly said. “First of all I mainly campaigned with my dog.
“Everywhere I went I had my little yellow car [with the slogan] ‘Ros Kelly Cares for Canberra’ and my dog. And I had Mrs Kelly’s cook book.”
Kelly’s husband at the time was of course journalist Paul Kelly, whose name she retained after they divorced.
Someone was once married to "Ned"? Oh you poor thing, with the pond's imagination whirring into overdrive and conjuring up a scene at the breakfast table.
Never mind, with the dog botherer ruled out - did the pond remember to say fuck him, and fuck all his horses? - the pond turned to Gemma. The pond doesn't usually get this desperate, but any Gem in a storm ...
The pond's point is, who is this loon? What experience is she drawing on while rabbiting on about credentialed people offering health advice to politicians?
Ah, there's not much more to be said, is there, seeing as how she sits in a stable of entertainers.
And so to some housekeeping because the reptiles tried to pump up Gemma's piece with a few snaps, which needed to be brought down to an appropriate size ...
That's better, as we turn back to the seasoned MC, operating at a very senior level ...
What the pond would like to note for the clueless one is that specialists in the field are involved every day in the decision making. In fact, the pond's partner had a meeting cancelled last week because an infectious diseases expert suddenly had to race off to talk to the relevant Minister about important matters.
More to the point, why did the pond bother with the ramblings of an experienced MC, delivering classical billy butts of the "to be very clear, I'm not suggesting no action is required at all kind", or the equally impressive billy butt, "I'm not for a moment saying they're not highly credentialed..." ... though of course they might be lacking in the MC department ...
What a fatuous, mealy-mouthed fop, and yet she has one virtue ... she's not the dog botherer ...
Maybe they had something better to do, like trying to sort out the fucking lockdowns ...
Yes, the pond reduced that snap to size, but there's only a gobbet to go, and see how the space-saving helps ...
Oh dear, but what a relief that nobody has apparently bothered to ask Gemma what to do, and how to adjust our course ... here's a cartoon for anyone who made it through to the end, with more such cartoons here ...
And so to the bonus, and of course it had to be the bromancer embarking on one of his classic rants, entirely out of step with the lockdown mood ...
Now this is a long bromancer outing, so all the pond is going to do is wind the bromancer up, and let him fly ...
Um, Hawkie? What about the head prefect, Malcolm Fraser, the original Malware?
Following the Whitlam dismissal in 1975, Fraser became Prime Minister and, in what seemed to be an abrupt departure from the Liberal Party's position, thoroughly embraced relations with China. As Leader of the Opposition, Whitlam called out the hypocrisy of the Liberal Party's radical policy shift. This study examines the domestic and international dynamics that shaped Fraser's views on China and ultimate adoption of a successful China policy. This is the untold story of a crucial turning point in Australia-China relations under the leadership of a conservative government, in which a strong relationship with China became a cornerstone of bipartisan Australian foreign policy.
Um, just that abstract will do, the pond promised it would let the bromancer flap away in free featherless flight ...
Around this point, the pond must pause to note that as with any government, there were good things done and bad things, and yet when you get an old DLP type flapping about, all you can expect is a goodly dose of vomitous hysteria ...
And yet, and yet, the United States really did fuck over Vietnam in acts of monstrous Agent Orange and bombing from the skies thuggery, which helped produce Pol Pot and sundry other disasters ... not to mention an insane obsession with body counts, as if destroying My Lai village would save it ... and Gough did crank up the pressure until it gradually dawned on the Tories that they were on a hiding to nothing ... but do go on defending the indefensible...
Oh fucketty fuck, another coulda, woulda, shoulda myth about the Vietnam war and how it was winnable, and only Watergate did it down, and who puts the mega strength kool aid in the water coolers at Surry Hills ... because how else to explain the carry on about the treatment of Vietnamese refugees, when right at this moment we are doing exactly the same to Afghani refugees, up against fundamentalists who make the North Vietnamese seem vaguely sane ...
Well the pond promised the bromancer would go into full reptile litany of grievance mode, and hasn't got the time or the energy to do the same for the original Malware, or little Johnny, or other leaders, all of whom have skeletons in the closet and dirty linen on the bed. Right now, the pond just wants an end to it all ...
Here's the thing, you have to actually get a relationship going, before the relationship can go pear-shaped, as they often do in marriage or in politics ...
The real pioneer in the Myanmar relationship was Bob Hawke and look how that ended ... and yet here we go with the reptiles never learning, and the bromancer talking of gold standards, as if the memory of fool's gold standard Gladys had already been forgotten ...
An utter disaster? That's the sort of conclusion that comes from a black and white man who's favourite analytical term is "nuts".
Well nuts to him, and nuts to the simplistic ramblings and simpleton assessments and the litany of abuse, and if we want to talk of utter disasters, right now the reptiles are doing a dinosaur walk towards doom, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan upped to a planetary scale, as evoked by First Dog, with the full version and more of the doggie here ...
On behalf of Polonius: "Andrews doesn't need an anonymous spokesman to attack the Coalition. He can leave that to ABC journalists." Oh no he can't, Prattling P, the ABC journalists don't do nearly a good enough job of it. Far too courteous and unbiased, you see.
ReplyDeleteReading the wonderfully self-satisfied Gemma was amusing. She is self-confessed as ignorant about a great many things, but she still knows better that all those politicians and health "bureaucrats" how to handle this world-wide deadly pandemic. Another case of intense 'selective inattention' really - just look at the whole of the rest of the world and Australia, with its terrible 'lockdowns', is still doing better than anybody else. Well, we were until Pyrites Gladys did her reptile approved thing and released it again onto NSW, and then Victoria and ...
ReplyDeleteBut that doesn't matter, does it because "Every time the states take the easy, and I would argue lazy, choice to lock down cities, they do so knowing it's the most vulnerable among us who are punished." Right, because, as we all know, the "most vulnerable among us" are the ones least infected and killed by Covid-19, aren't they.
Ah - a quiet Sunday afternoon, and DP has delivered unto me the full text of ‘contribution’ from Ms Ton-Yee-Nee, and - bonus - from Foreign Editor Sheridan. Having read them, I thank Dorothy again that I did not embarrass myself by asking My Source for those same words.
ReplyDeleteSeems all that Ms Ton-Yee-Nee (she was most insistent, back in May, that we pronounce her name correctly, and I would not want her to be fretting about that, given the ‘unique road she on which she has walked’). Anyway, Ms Ton seems to have pulled a fairly standard ‘bait’n’switch’. The teaser para. revealed yesterday pointed us to ‘people with little experience of real life’, but, now that I can burrow down into the rest of her contribution, I read that ‘A quick scan reveals an impressive mix of backgrounds that range from academe and research to time spent in the armed services and with non-government organisations overseas, as well as in rural and regional medicine in Australia.’
Setting aside the politicians’ tautology of ‘rural and regional’ - I know the experience of those in my family who have practised medicine in rural areas, and I can assure Ms Ton that they have always been well aware that they were running a business, and, yes they understand cashflow, absolutely.
But I could not find any consistency in Ms Ton’s argument. I suspect she had an idea, nurtured by the reptile references to ‘unelected bureaucrats’, that the advisors on pandemic policy were some special breed of medico, and set out to gather in the proof. Yep - ask for their c.v.s - oh - they do come from a wide range of backgrounds. That won’t get me published - put up a reptile teaser.
On balance - as I wrote yesterday - she might have been more acceptable just by offering the single paragraph, which would have been enough to trigger the usual respondents.
The Bromancer? The full text bears out my suspicions. It has the weakness of all such revisits to that time, that it has the litany of ills to be attributed to Whitlam, but says nothing about the magnificent triumph of J Malcolm Fraser in setting all that right, using the remarkable majorities he received at two elections. Well, there had to be triumphs for Fraser, didn’t there? He, who had received the call, and was excused from following those silly ‘conservative’ conventions of the Westminster system, so he could save the country - it just had to happen.
Perhaps that will be the topic of a future Bromancer column. The research for that could consume quite some time.
A rant from the Bromancer always provokes the fundamental question: what planet in what galaxy does he live on because it sure isn't Sol 3 in the Milky Way. But anyway, a fine fantasy about Whitlam, Vietnam and sundry other reptile bogies such as Lionel Murphy and Tirath Khemlani.
ReplyDeleteYes, Whitlam did have a few 'radicals' amongst his elected members and senators, but that is only to be expected given the length of time of right-wing control of the federal and many state parliaments. It is also so that after such a period, the Public Service had become seriously 'politicised' which Whitlam had to overcome.
But so very many reptile objections and just one very miniaturised achievement - the Whitlam government had - with some effort from Bill Hayden and against serious right-wing resistance - legislated for Medibank. Yet if it comes down to it, I reckon most Australians would rate Medibank as one of Australia's great achievements.
As to "the American alliance and Anzus", well it is important to remember that the US president for most of Whitlam's time was Richard 'Tricky Dicky' Nixon (Jan 1969 - Aug 1974) and that it was Tricky who deliberately prolonged the Vietnam war to win a presidential election:
"In 1968, the Paris Peace talks, intended to put an end to the 13-year-long Vietnam War, failed because an aide working for then-Presidential candidate Richard Nixon convinced the South Vietnamese to walk away from the dealings, says a new report by the BBC’s David Taylor."
---
Nixon feared a breakthrough at the Paris Peace talks designed to find a negotiated settlement to the Vietnam war, and he knew this would derail his campaign.
In late October 1968 there were major concessions from Hanoi which promised to allow meaningful talks to get underway in Paris – concessions that would justify Johnson calling for a complete bombing halt of North Vietnam. This was exactly what Nixon feared."
Nixon Prolonged Vietnam War for Political Gain—And Johnson Knew About It, Newly Unclassified Tapes Suggest
Nixon ran on a platform that opposed the Vietnam war, but to win the election, he needed the war to continue
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/nixon-prolonged-vietnam-war-for-political-gainand-johnson-knew-about-it-newly-unclassified-tapes-suggest-3595441/
Quite a few Aussies were just a little unsure of how good an ally Nixon's regime would actually be if he could see any gain from betraying us. But none of that means anything at all to the Bromancer.
As to the "the American alliance", would it have been a bad thing if it ruptured? A bit heretical to say it but what benefit has it been post the Pacific War? It seems to have come at considerable cost instead.
DeleteI guess there's all those 'colour revolutions' and straight out invasions - sorry, military interventions to consider if you don't toe the line.
There's just that very fundamental "American alliance" question, isn't there: if China (or Russia or Pakistan) nuked Australia, would America nuke them ?
DeleteAmerican installations would be the primary targets in Oz and, if history is any guide, our alliance would likely be what pulled us into a conflict.
DeleteAs to "would they act" - that is uncertain.
Just an interesting comment on "Golden" Gladys from John Quiggin:
ReplyDelete"Poor understanding of uncertainty was evident in the rush to label New South Wales as the gold standard and assume that a handful of successes was evidence that there was nothing to worry about. This conclusion didn’t take account of the fact that the policy could not afford even one failure. All high-risk strategies share two key features: they work until they fail, and they are likely to be hailed as the product of genius until they are not."
https://insidestory.org.au/one-failure-too-many/