Saturday, June 28, 2025

In which the pond EVs with the Ughmann and defaces the bromancer offering with graffiti of the 'toon kind ...

 

Being a paid-up member of the cult, the pond dropped in on the Melbourne EV show yesterday and checked out the range to hand (it's still on for the next two days).

Whatever its reputation as a manufacturer BYD had a tidy range, though it was a pity that their contribution to the “funny little car” genre, the Seagull/Dolphin didn’t make it to the stand.

The Polestar range was also intriguing, as was the Smart 3, though it felt a tad over-priced compared to others in the range (though there were keen EOFY deals being offered on the day).

Sadly the most intriguing new entry, China’s latest Tessler killer, the Xiaomi YU7, was a no show, but that’s because the phone and appliance manufacturer had its hands busy delivering to a booming domestic market. (See the AFR's China’s EV newcomer sells 200,000 SUVs in 3 minutes, *archive link)

There was a pleasing ring of shame around the Tesler stand, much like the complete lack of interest in the remarkably vulgar Roller that made it to the floor in Jeff's temple by the Yarra.

There were oddities, like Mazda's pathetic attempt with a couple of hybrids, while Toyota was completely MIA, being too busy missing the boat and attempting to subvert the market by converting governments to its pathetic misplaced hybrid hopes (when you've missed the bus completely).

There were plenty of others that were MIA - such as the Renault 5 - but there were more than enough vehicles on offer to tempt the pond, though the pond hungers for the unobtainable Xiaomi. 

There was much talk of it being a Ferrari knock-off, but back in the day the pond had a 280ZX and the Japanese industry didn't mind talk of knock-offs in those days. If it sold, or helped the brand, it was a knock-on.

One thing's certain - EVs are on the move in China in a big way, and there are plenty of contenders intent on world domination and driving Tesler out of business, and with many domestic customers and a government intent on helping, it's going to take a heap of tariffs to stop the tsunami, and even then?

Say what? Why on earth is the pond neglecting its herpetology studies to blather on about EVs?

Well look at the lizard Oz this day ...



Yes, there's the Ughmann, just making it into the cut at the very bottom, trying his stupid best to make the most of Leon's and Tesler's misfortunes, and showing woeful ignorance about EVs, in the way he manages to show woeful ignorance about pretty much everything ...



Any punter will immediately realise that they're in the hands of an intellectual gnat, a mediocrity of the first water, a tragically out of date mind at play, what with "virtue signalling" making it into the header.

Just stop it, stop it or you'll go blind and get hairs on your palms, it's as bad as blathering about "woke" all the time, verbal crutches for addled brains: Elon Musk is a blow for virtue signalling Tesla drivers, The Tesla is the perfect symbol of the Western world’s ‘energy transition’: an expensive, materially intensive, performative illusion that offers net-zero benefit to the planet.
The caption for the two EV enthusiasts and for those asking Leon Who?: Donald Trump and Tesla chief Elon Musk in a promotional event for the brand at the White House last March before they parted company. Picture: Mandel Ngan / AFP
The mystical advice: This article contains features which are only available in the web version, Take me there

Take it away Ughmann, attempt a gloat ...

The first time I saw the sticker of shame was in California.
A baby-blue Tesla glided by in Los Angeles and plastered on the boot was: “I bought this before Elon went crazy.”
It was in September 2024, before Donald Trump was re-elected US president and before Tesla chief Elon Musk was tasked by him with gutting the US federal administration.
Imagine how the hapless Tesla owner feels now, the halo effect of green branding sullied by a mercurial genius who turned this symbol of planetary cleanliness into a dirty joke about power. The “Elon is a Nazi” software update was not in the handbook.
One of the reasons for buying any prestige car is advertising. The first thing any expensive car says is: “I have more money than you.” The more you spend, the louder you are shouting: “I’m rich.”
If you buy a Ferrari, you have issues that go well beyond being prepared to invest more than $500,000 in a car that cannot legally hit top gear anywhere in Australia or safely navigate suburban driveways faster than a 1960 Fiat.

The reptiles immediately interrupted to remind the hive mind that EVs were part of the despicable world of renewables and all that jazz, Former Snowy Hydro chief executive Paul Broad says there is “no chance in the world” of the Albanese government reaching its goal for 89 per cent of new car sales being electric by 2030. “You and I sit here today and think we’re going to have 98 per cent of all vehicles sold in Australia, driven in Australia, in the next 10 years are going to be electric,” Mr Broad told Sky News Australia. “Do you believe that? “There’s no chance in the world of that happening.”



Thanks for that broadly stupid set of observations, and do your best to ignore what's happening in China.

Back to the feeble attempt at a gloat:

For a time Tesla stood alone in both advertising wealth and purring planet-saving street cred. This was a marketer’s triumph: a status symbol badged as a moral triumph. You weren’t just buying a car, you were buying indulgences from the pantheist church.
Being pagan, this is largely a church of the left. The right-wingers are driving Range Rovers and Mercedes G-Wagons to the school drop-off.

(BTW, there were Mercs at the show, and Audis. All designed for the status conscious and those in search of a leasing arrangement, and never mind that the Chinese were eating their lunch, while the poor old VW stand looked decidedly thin, unless you wanted a people mover).

Don’t buy this argument? Then consider this: if the Los Angeleno Tesla owner did not buy the car – at least in part – for virtue signalling, then why the sticker disavowing the company owner? The sticker is also advertising. It proves the owner bought the car for all the right reasons, so please don’t key it.

What a prize maroon. It's clear enough why anyone would put a sticker on in the current circumstances. Anything to prevent the vehicle being torched or keyed or otherwise damaged.

It so happens that the Tessler isn't a bad car, though it's a tad too ascetic, too Opus Dei in its layout, stylings and fittings for the pond (which isn't to suggest that the pond thinks that dressing up the Atto 3 as a cockpit is a pleasing alternative).

It just so happens that the car got caught up in the prize maroon behaviour of its boss, and his ill-fated dalliance with a Cantaloupe Caligula.

So of course putting out this sort of sticker ... A sticker on a Tesla last March. Picture: AFP



... isn't virtue signalling.

(a) It might well be the truth, depending when the vehicle was purchased, because he did go decidedly weird, to the point of ketamine krazy, and (b) it's bloody sensible, a bit like a turtle putting on a defensive carapace to ward off the zombie Ughmann hordes (it being a bit hard to put garlic, or holy water, or silver bullets on a car, and who but a Leavitt would want a crucifix?)

Stand by now for some more moralising cant ...where the true point of the Ughmann exercise is revealed. More renewables bashing ...

When you think about it, the Tesla is the perfect symbol of the Western world’s “energy transition”: an expensive, materially intensive, performative illusion that offers net-zero benefit to the planet. A monument to motion without progress, as China’s coal-powered electric vehicle industry churns out better, cheaper cars.
The truth is, the Tesla was never saving the planet one commute at a time.
Electricity is only as green as its energy source. Unless you have a solar array capable of charging your car, then in California about 42 per cent of your fuel comes from locally burned or imported natural gas. Nine per cent of it is nuclear.
On mainland Australia’s east coast, your Tesla’s fuel is mostly black coal and brown coal.
It will come as no surprise to learn that Canberra is fast becoming the Tesla capital of Australia. Here the stickers of shame are multiplying as owners fear their peers will see the “T” on their bonnet as screaming “Trump” as loudly as a presidential post on Truth Social.

And who would want to be associated with the meandering ravings of a president in deep cognitive decline?

At this point the reptiles slipped in a reminder of who Leon was, SpaceX, Twitter and electric car maker Tesla CEO Elon Musk. Picture: AFP




Sheesh, couldn't the reptiles have dug up a decent snap showing Leon in a state of ecstasy (or a state of something)? You know ...



Back to the Ughmann, showing that vision of a gnat ...

Happily, the many public servants counted among the ranks of Tesla owners are now spared a daily commute to work because the election underlined the fact that forcing them to go to the office was an abuse of their human rights.
On their rare trips out, the capital’s Tesla drivers no doubt find comfort in the ACT government’s boast that the territory runs on 100 per cent renewable energy.
Alas, this is based on creative accounting, not generation. The territory sits in the middle of the NSW grid, where the dominant fuel is black coal. Its green credentials rest on the annual surrender of renewable energy certificate offsets, and the bookkeeping is opaque.
Welcome to net zero, where what you say matters more than what you do. Governments set targets based on a zombie word: ambition. Only some – such as Australia – are actually trying to hit those targets. The ambition of others is to do nothing. Just like believing buying a Tesla will save the planet, it’s a fraud.
Turns out your electric vehicle has devoured enormous amounts of energy and minerals before you drive it off the showroom floor. The International Energy Agency says a typical EV needs about six times the minerals of a conventional car.
Energy savant Professor Vaclav Smil calculates that a 450kg lithium car battery contains about 11kg of lithium, nearly 14kg of cobalt, 27kg of nickel, more than 40kg of copper and 50kg of graphite, as well as about 181kg of steel, aluminium and plastics.
Getting all of that demands ploughing up a lot of earth to save the planet.
“Supplying these materials for a single vehicle requires processing about 40 tons of ores, and given the low concentration of many elements in their ores, it necessitates extracting and processing about 225 tons of raw materials,” Smil writes.
“And aggressive electrification of road transport would soon require multiplying these needs by tens of millions of units per year!”

Did "energy savant" Smil manage to do a comparison of EVs v. ancient technology? 

There are plenty around, such as this one, which concluded ...

...The sustainability of electric vehicles versus petrol cars is complex and multifaceted. Electric cars generally offer significant advantages in terms of GHG emissions and long-term energy efficiency, provided they are recharged using renewable energy sources. However, they are not without their environmental and social impacts, particularly regarding resource extraction and battery recycling. Petrol cars continue to be responsible for high CO₂ emissions and ecological impacts resulting from oil extraction, although their lifecycle is less resource-intensive in terms of rare metal mining.
The true sustainability of electric vehicles will depend on advances in battery recycling, improvements in mining practices, and the use of clean energy for their recharging. As these challenges are addressed, electric vehicles are likely to become a more sustainable option than petrol cars, but only if global policies and technologies advance in a responsible and ethical manner.

Well yes, and take a look at the current advances in batteries in China in terms of efficiencies, re-use and so on ...  and by way of contrast, imagine a world which continues on with gas guzzling.

While the mango Mussolini is intent on destroying science in America, the Chinese are going full steam (and electric charge) ahead on research and innovation, and the luddites at the lizard Oz imagine they can hold back the tide? Good luck with that.

At this point the reptiles provided a snap of the prof., as if that bestowed authority on him ...Professor Vaclav Smil: ‘Materials for a single vehicle requires processing about 40 tons of ores.’ Picture: supplied




On the Ughmann rambled, prof. powered ...

To put that in perspective: if all the earth needed to be dug up to extract the ores for one car were piled into a mound of dirt, it would be about the height of a two-storey building and as wide as a tennis court.
So there is a job of work to do here. As of the end of 2023, there were about 1.5 billion light vehicles in the global fleet and only about 2.7 per cent of them were electric.
A submission to a parliamentary inquiry into electric vehicles by expat Australian Simon Michaux of the Geological Survey of Finland, found that to get Australia’s vehicle fleet to 100 per cent electric by 2050 demands an increase “of the order of 770,000 EVs of various vehicle classes, and 650,000 EV charging stations, each year for the next 26 years”.
Surely this trifle can be overcome by government fiat. Or more ambition.

The Ughmann really does work hard to dig up amazing sources ... and so cue a final reptile AV distraction ... CarExpert Founder Paul Maric says the confidence people have for electric cars in Australia “isn’t strong enough”. Just 3,832 EVs were sold in Australia in January, which is a share of just 4.4 per cent. Tesla saw the most significant drop, falling 33 per cent in overall sales.




And so to the final gobbet, and for those interested, the Canadian Fraser Institute is perfectly happy to accept cash in the paw from the likes of the Charles Koch Foundation ... (not to mention other right wing sources).

Canadian public policy think tank the Fraser Institute has run the numbers and found that meeting the 2030 targets for electric-vehicle mandates adopted by Western governments would require 388 new mines.
“The sheer scale of mining required to meet EV mandates raises serious questions about the timelines being imposed by governments,” study author Kenneth Green said.
You get the drift. The road ahead is long and the energy needed to build just electric cars will be staggering. And transport is just one element of it. There is nothing green about this revolution.
No matter. We live in the era where performance trumps truth. What counts is not what is real but what we choose to believe.
And believing electric vehicles are better for the planet is yet another article of faith on this religious pilgrimage.

It's always the way, just as a hammer will always see the world as nails, so a failed seminarian and determined climate science denialist will always see science and alternative ways as conforming to his world view, as articles of faith. 

It's why the pond prefers to be an atheist ... and incidentally by way of experience, willing to allow that EVs are a pleasant way to get about, much quieter, much less inclined to stink up the place with exhaust fumes, as easy on the pocket as any gas guzzler, stacked with tech items, and with plenty of toe for those who like that sort of thing... 

And now please allow the pond a moment to drool in a most unseemly way ...



By the way that Ughmann "better for the planet" verbiage featured a link to another piece in the hive mind ...dated October 2021, which about sums up the former seminarian's ability to stay in touch.

A sample of that reptile story from those ancient times and a timely reminder of why the pond never bothers with reptile links, because they always keep the suckers and the johns inside the hive mind...



Ah, Well Done Angus, as the pond's correspondent would have the beefy, windmill-hating, boofhead from Goulburn called ...

Keep up Ughmann, do better, you sound truly pathetic and remarkably out of touch, even for a reptile lurking deep inside the hive mind ...

And so to the alternatives for the add-on for the day ... and naturally the pond turned to the extreme far right ...



English in India? AI fro snappy Tom? The pond is well over AI thinking it can guess what the pond's keyboard should be saying. Just fuck off ... 

The dog botherer doing projection yet again? You know, talking of radical ideology, yet seemingly unaware that he's barking mad, an amazingly fundamentalist bigot, and constantly howling at the wind?

Prattling Polonius going full MAGA? And still cavorting as a furry in the guise of a watch dog?

The pond shoved them all in the too hard basket - there's always the Sunday meditation to contemplate some of the dribbling - and went back to the alleged "news" portion of the rag to see what else will on offer.

Keen observers of the reptiles will note that nattering "Ned" isn't amongst the hacks hacking out a piece for the hive mind.

Who knows where he is, what's happened or is happening to him, and it also has to be asked, who cares?

But that's how the pond ended up with all 11 minutes of the bromance's bleating into the ether, or so the reptiles timed the interminable suffering ...



The header: Trump’s big 12 days: transforms NATO, pulverises Iran, disdains Albanese, The US President has imposed himself on the global strategic order to greater effect in a shorter period than any American leader since Ronald Reagan. Anthony Albanese is lucky Trump doesn’t seem to know who he is.

Luckily there wasn't a caption or a credit for the appalling gif which headed the piece and showed the Cantaloupe Caligula plucking the strings of the middle east.

It's the sort of image that would delight a MAGA moron or King Donald himself, and it heralded the bromancer going full MAGA in his addled mind (which is why the plea This article contains features which are only available in the web version, Take me there sounds more like an imprecation).

A funny thing happened with the bromancer going full MAGA.

The reptiles decided that they'd load the piece to the gills with visual distractions, and the pond's brain snapped.

The pond decided on a party game. The reptiles would offer a visual break, but instead of the pond offering an image, it would offer a cartoon. What could go wrong?

So to the bromancer in full flight, triumphalism run rampant:

Donald Trump has transformed the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation as surely as he has transformed the Iranian nuclear weapons program. The US-Israel versus Iran conflict was 12 days that shook the world. And the shaking isn’t over yet. This is a pivot point in modern history.
Archimedes said he could move the world with a lever. Trump moves the world with unpredictable but decisive actions, scatological language, immense willpower, ferocious temper and the awesome authority of the American military. And, though it may seem to defy some Trump instincts, in this case with the intimate co-operation of an ally, Israel.
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman General Dan Caine conducted a Pentagon press conference in which they detailed just what the B-2 bombers did when they dropped their bunker-buster bombs, the Massive Ordnance Penetrators. This included sets of six bombs on Fordow, most going down ventilation shafts and causing massive explosions underground, the biggest explosions in fact of any non-nuclear weapon.
The MOPs were designed specifically to destroy Fordow, and US military engineers have been refining their attack plans for nearly 15 years. It’s all but inconceivable that whatever was in the Fordow facilities, where Iran enriched uranium to near weapons quality, wasn’t devastated.
Trump’s transformation of NATO may be as consequential as his strike against Iran’s nuclear program. All NATO members except Spain committed to raising their military budgets to 5 per cent of GDP (including 1.5 per cent for military infrastructure, cyber, intelligence and the like). That’s the biggest step forward in Western resolve in decades.
Trump is not successful everywhere. One part of the world is impervious to the realities Trump’s addressing. That’s Australia, lotus-eater land, with a government seemingly forever away on a long weekend.

At this point the reptiles offered a visual distraction, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has refused to budge on Australian defence spending following a recent agreement from NATO allies to increase to 5 per cent of GDP.   This comes as White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt suggested Indo-Pacific countries should follow NATO allies and “do it as well”. The Australian government is considering lifting its 2033 target of 2.33 per cent but has resisted the 3.5 per cent calls by President Trump’s administration.

The pond offered its first cartoon, one intended to evoke the bromancer's state of mind...



Back to the bromancer's endless, boundless triumphalism ...

NATO is muscling up, but while Anthony Albanese and Richard Marles, antipodean Clausewitzes both, may not be able to get an appointment with Trump or even a phone call with his hairdresser, they know so much better than those foolish NATO dummies.
Australia proudly proclaims its Know-Nothing strategic policy. The Albanese government will keep defence spending at just 2 per cent of GDP, rising gently across nearly a decade to 2.3 per cent. In that same period Britain, with its much bigger economy and defence force, goes to 3.5 per cent. What would those Whitehall Yes Minister types know about security?
Albanese on Friday morning recommitted to his manifestly inadequate defence budget, telling a press conference: “We continue to invest in whatever capabilities Australia needs – will continue to do that.”
That’s manifestly untrue. Sir Angus Houston, who conducted the Defence Strategic Review Albanese commissioned, Peter Dean who wrote it and former Department of Defence chief Dennis Richardson, whom Albanese commissioned to do an inquiry on submarines, have all said the nation must go to 3 per cent of GDP to achieve even its basic defence capability aims. They, along with countless other analysts, are not doing this at America’s behest.

At this point the reptiles offered another visual distraction, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese defies the logic of his own advisers by keeping defence spending at just 2 per cent of GDP. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman

The pond thought a 'toon better explained the mindset ...



The bromancer carried on berating anyone who refused to swallow his MAGA delusions ...

Many capabilities mandated in the DSR itself have been shelved by the Albanese government because it can’t control its budget. The Trump administration is right to ask why its taxpayers and service personnel should defend Australia if Australia won’t defend itself. Trump got a sensible reply from NATO. From Albanese, the reply is nonsense.
Albanese is lucky Trump seems not to know who he is. Trump has threatened Spain, which has promised to go beyond the 2 per cent level (which Australia now spends) with trade penalties for being a security free-rider. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, when asked about Australia, said: “If our allies and friends in Europe can do it, I think our allies and friends in the Asia-Pacific can do it as well.”

The reptiles offered a stunning snap, stunning if you happen to have the mindset of a stunned mullet, Smoke billows the Iranian capital Tehran, one of the sites targeted in Israel’s Operation Rising Lion, a ‘stunning military and intelligence success’. Picture: Sepah News / AFP

As the bromancer was speaking of budgets, the pond preferred this 'toon ...



The bromancer was all in on the spend, spend, spend routine, and evoked jolly Joe, as if that completely irrelevant fossil was a useful reference point ...

For Albanese to defy the logic of his own DSR, the logic of all the people he appointed to provide policy guidance, the logic of every analyst and former soldier who takes defence seriously, and the logic of the Trump administration eyeballing freeloading allies, he must believe that Australia enjoys a vastly more benign security environment than all the NATO partners, or that NATO’s strategic analysis is fundamentally wrong. Joe Hockey is right to argue that Australia under Albanese is slipping from a tier one US ally to a tier three ally, a massive loss for Australian security.
What a pity Albanese wasn’t at The Hague to persuade them all of their folly. Surely NATO nations too could cut their defence budgets in half and spend all the remaining pitiful budgets on a project designed to produce a submarine fleet in the 2050s. Of course the present prime ministerial anonymity is a uniquely impotent position for Australia. But an encounter between the Giant Will and the Giant Void could be unbecoming, to put it mildly.

The reptiles provided another snap, With Iran, Trump showed he would back an ally when he thought it was in America’s interests and the ally was making a genuine effort itself – even when it involved serious military and political risk. Picture: Mandel Ngan / AFP

If the giant void didn't satisfy, how about a giant dome?



At this point the bromancer offered a mild rebuke, to show he was aware that the emperor might occasionally behave in an unseemly way, albeit unbefitting for an all-powerful monarch ...

Speaking of which, it’s unbecoming for Trump to campaign for the Nobel Peace Prize. But Trump’s almost always unbecoming. 

But that's only so the bromancer can play an age-old game, along the lines of "you have a mole on your face" ... "but I love moles and you're astonishingly beautiful."

See how the game is played ...

He’s also often very effective. Sometimes he says crazy things (taking Greenland by force, making Canada the 51st state). Other times he speaks critical truths bluntly. At his best, as with Iran and NATO, Trump’s better than any recent president. At his worst, as when he humiliated Ukraine’s President and temporarily cut off all aid to Ukraine, he’s worse than any recent president.
Since World War II, there have not been many more consequential periods of presidential activity than Trump’s efforts now. Israel’s Operation Rising Lion hit Iran, especially its nuclear project, all over the place and was a stunning military and intelligence success.
Trump’s Operation Midnight Hammer transformed into kinetic reality what had previously existed only as presidential rhetoric – akin to the war on drugs – Iran must never have a nuclear weapon.
Trump has imposed himself on the global strategic order to greater effect in a shorter period than any president since Ronald Reagan. NATO secretary-general Mark Rutte claims Trump’s activism going back to his election in 2016 has already resulted in, cumulatively, NATO spending $US1 trillion ($1.5 trillion) more on defence.
Before the NATO meeting, Trump bombed Iran’s nuclear facilities into the stone age and likely hastened the end of the ayatollahs’ regime. Right from the start, he backed Israel in its preceding military operation.
The US Middle East military command, CENTCOM, works hand in glove with Israeli Defence Forces. Israel is a formidable, independent, military power. Trump authorised Israel’s actions in advance and provided US military assets to help intercept incoming missiles from Iran.

At this point the reptiles interrupted with a trio of snaps featuring

Handout satellite pictures taken after US strikes on Iran's Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant northeast of the city of Qom …
… and in central Iran, the Natanz facility …
… and Isfahan. Pictures: Maxar Technologies / AFP

The pond won't offer three cartoons in a row, but will help anyone wanting to take a cruise to get the hell out of here ...


On and on the bromancer meandered ...

Then Trump clobbered the Iranian facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, using weapons, Massive Ordnance Penetrators, on Fordow and Natanz, that only the Americans possess. He quickly insisted on an Israel-Iran ceasefire. The Iranians complied because they were suffering daily military humiliation and the loss of an ever increasing inventory of military and state facilities.
A couple of Iranian missiles were fired against Israel after the ceasefire took place. There was such confusion in Iran by then, these may even have been on a kind of automatic timer. One was intercepted, one landed harmlessly. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was determined to re-create the new post October 7 doctrine that he has established with Hezbollah in Lebanon. Israel will no longer tolerate small breaches of ceasefires. It reacts decisively if attacked. There was a ceasefire with Hamas, after all, when the October 7 terror atrocities took place.
So Netanyahu launched 50 planes to hit Iran. Trump was furious. What are you doing ruining my beautiful ceasefire? He famously declared, on camera: “They (Israel and Iran) have been fighting so long they don’t know what the f--k they’re doing.” It was monstrously unfair to equate, momentarily, Israel with Iran.

At this point the reptiles interrupted with an AV distraction that had an amazingly long tag, U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday celebrated the rapid end of the 12-day war between Iran and Israel, boasting that his intervention had brought the conflict to a halt and expressing optimism about future ties with Tehran. Speaking at the NATO summit in The Hague, Trump likened the war to “two kids in a schoolyard” fighting until they’re worn out, and said U.S. airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities were what ultimately ended the fighting. “This ended that war. If we didn’t take that out, they would be fighting right now,” he said. The war began when Israel launched surprise strikes on Iranian military and nuclear targets on June 13. Iran responded with a barrage of ballistic missiles, some hitting civilian areas in Israel. Days later, Trump ordered US B-2 bombers to strike Iran’s Fordow enrichment facility and other key nuclear sites with 30,000-pound bunker-busting bombs. Both countries later declared victory after agreeing to a ceasefire. But the true extent of damage to Iran’s nuclear program remains unclear. A preliminary U.S. intelligence assessment suggested the strikes may have only delayed Tehran’s nuclear ambitions by several months. Trump dismissed the report as “inconclusive,” insisting the targets were “virtually obliterated.” International Atomic Energy Agency chief Rafael Grossi cautioned that while physical damage may have occurred, Iran’s technical expertise and industrial capacity remained intact. “The last thing they want to do is enrich anything right now,” Trump added, suggesting Tehran now seeks stability, not escalation. Trump concluded by predicting a shift in relations: “We’ll end up having somewhat of a relationship with Iran.”

One Luckovich deserves another ...



A veritable hole in one shouted the starry eyed bromancer in unison with his king ...

In any event, Trump had a frank and character-building phone call with Netanyahu and convinced him to call back the planes, which were minutes from delivering their payload. They struck a single Iranian radar instead. They had to refuel on the way back because they’d never before flown to Iran and come back still full.
Trump’s achievements go well beyond all this. He reinforced American deterrence globally. Trump’s predecessor as president, Joe Biden, said the right things about alliances and deterrence but projected such dithering weakness, and demonstrated in the withdrawal from Kabul such epic administration incompetence, that he undermined American credibility, whatever his words were.
Trump, by contrast, frequently says a lot of wrong things about alliances. Even going to this NATO summit, Trump, when asked whether he endorsed article five of the NATO treaty, which obliges member states to come to each other’s aid if one is attacked, replied confusingly that it depended on how you interpreted article five.
But Trump showed in Iran he would back an ally when he thought it was in America’s interests and the ally was making a genuine effort itself.
This is disastrous in its implications for Australia because we are making almost no effort at all on defence. Trump showed he would take such action even when it involved serious risk, both military risk and political risk.

Speaking of jolly Joe, the pond should have realised the reptile fix was in, and sure enough there he came, Former ambassador to the US Joe Hockey claims United States President Donald Trump’s underlying focus is “China and the Indo-Pacific”. “We do need the United States, they’re the biggest investor in Australia, they are crucial to the Indo-Pacific,” Mr Hockey told Sky News Australia. “They’ve just shown the world their capability to deliver on their objectives, and importantly, they are a force for good and have been throughout our history. “The danger is at the moment that we can slip from being a tier one ally of the United States to a tier three ally. “Donald Trump … his focus is not really Europe, his focus is not really the Middle East, his focus is China and the Indo-Pacific.”

And speaking of objectives ...



It all seems so long ago, and so to the war on China ...

Though Iran and China could hardly be more different, and Trump could not intervene effectively in northeast Asia with a single uncontested bombing raid in one night, Trump’s military decisiveness and his effective transformation of NATO help to give Beijing serious cause for concern. Hmmm. May not be so smart after all to think the Americans won’t take action.
Trump’s actions also have important implications for American politics. In this, he somewhat resembles Bob Hawke. Trump leads a movement, MAGA, which instinctively doesn’t like foreign military engagements. It’s not exactly isolationist. Certainly the American people aren’t isolationist. Most Americans, and most Republicans, sensibly, and in the baddest way, don’t want Iran to acquire nuclear weapons. But they’re very wary of foreign entanglements and forever wars.
They certainly want US allies, which rely on America for their own security, as Australia does, to pay more for their own defence. Trump has again changed American politics.
Having a fight with CNN and The New York Times over how they interpret the Iran attacks only helps Trump. He’s educating and socialising his own MAGA movement into accepting that occasionally Washington must intervene militarily overseas in its own interests, in the interests of its allies, even of humanity.

Indeed, indeed, it's all going splendidly well, and the reptiles unleashed a distracting snap, Trump and his administration unleashed on CNN after a story which reported the US strikes on Iran’s nuclear program did not destroy it. Picture: Carlos Barria / POOL / AFP

Meanwhile, in the real world never visited by the reptiles ...



The bromancer decided to get really weird by blathering about Bob ...

The parallel with Hawke is this. Hawke led a Labor Party that had last been in government under the disastrous Gough Whitlam, who nearly destroyed the US alliance, and ended up dominated by the anti-American left. When Hawke won in 1983, Labor ranks were extremely wary of the US alliance. Hawke embraced the alliance while delivering buckets of good Labor policy. He transformed Labor’s internal political culture.
This transformation lasted nearly 30 years but is unravelling now as the Albanese government lacks strategic direction, its internal culture aimless and hollow on security.

And as the French clock maker continues to scribble in ways that offer peace and harmony with the Xi government, the reptiles decided to run a snap from the archives,  President Ronald Reagan welcomes Bob Hawke to the White House in 1983. Picture: AP

The pond was more interested in F bombs ...



The pond isn't sure all the 'toon distractions are working, but if anyone decodes them as puerile attempts to downgrade, mock, belittle, diminish and insult the bromancer and his mango monarch, then the basic intent is coming through ...

Trump is doing for MAGA what Hawke did for Labor. Trump commands his base but he didn’t invent the base. The base in a sense invented him, or rather the base called out for him. Trump may do many bad things or many good things in the rest of his presidency. He’s utterly unpredictable.
But in Operation Midnight Hammer, and in the transformation of NATO, Trump is delivering the MAGA base something it thought no longer existed – successful American strategic policy.
So let’s briefly consider, one by one, the likely fallout from these past two weeks for Iran, Israel and the US.
Iran has been dealt savage blows. Though it will be months before all the intelligence is in and all the calculations made, there’s no real doubt about this. A very early US Defence Intelligence Agency assessment was tendentiously leaked. It said the effect of the US strikes could be relatively minor (or indeed severe), it didn’t yet have the evidence and it had very low confidence in the provisional alternatives it outlined.
The best explanation of this report and its leaking is that, as Trump alleges and often wildly exaggerates, there are a lot of people in the American security establishment who are deeply anti-Trump and who hate the idea of his claiming any success.

So the bromancer doesn't have a clue, and that's the basis for celebrating a triumph, and so the reptiles ran with ... Ayatollah Khamenei emerged just hours ago for the first time in several days. The Supreme Leader of Iran gave an impassioned speech to his people declaring victory over Israel and the United States.

Winning all the way, so much winning ...




On and on prattled the now fully MAGA bromancer, adopting "Ned's" inclination to scribble in the third person, as in "tells Inquirer", as opposed to "tells me" ...

Others cling to the notion that Barack Obama’s discredited deal with Iran is the proper solution and should never have been repudiated by Trump in his first term.
But International Atomic Energy Agency director Rafael Grossi says Iran’s facilities are no longer operational. CIA director John Ratcliffe says credible intelligence indicates severe damage to Iran’s facilities. The IAEA says Iran before and after the US strikes is totally different. Israeli intelligence assessments confirm this view. Of course, fuller assessments will take time.
Ehud Yaari, Israel’s pre-eminent strategic analyst, tells Inquirer that change in Iran is less likely to come from popular rebellion than from disagreements within the ruling elites. He suggests that in the last days of the war effective decision-making passed out of the hands of supreme leader Ali Khamenei and into the hands of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council.
They weren’t trying to depose Khamenei but to sideline him. Says Yaari: “At every point from October 7 Khamenei took the wrong decision.” Iran massively overplayed its hand. Its regime is now severely weakened. Much analysis has been provided about what a popular revolt in Iran would look like. But that’s not the centre of gravity, nor what’s likely to change Iranian behaviour, Yaari argues.

Cue another visual distraction, While Trump will revel in this Middle East success, Albanese’s government appears unable to ‘comprehend nor affect any of the strategic dynamics that swirl around the world’.

Comprehend the mask of fascism if you will ...



Back to the Reichsmarschall des Großaustralisch Reiches promising eternal vigilance, and likely enough, eternal war ...

Instead, that will come from divisions within the elite: “Iran now requires a major, major decision, whether it now sends a lot of good money after bad.” Trying to resuscitate its nuclear program, which was always headed towards weapons, trying to re-create all its proxy forces, means once more impoverishing ordinary Iranians.
Yossi Kuperwasser, head of the Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security, puts it to Inquirer in even starker terms: “I think they (the Iranian regime) are under huge pressure now. All the big questions arise. The reformists will ask the ayatollah and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps: what happened to all our investments, what happened to our air defences, to the crown jewels of our nuclear program, to our proxy forces – Hezbollah didn’t fire a shot. What happened to all our money that went to building those projects, billions and billions and billions of dollars, where has that all gone?”
Iran is weaker than it has been for many decades. It’s still just barely possible it has kept some 60 per cent enriched uranium and, in some new secret facility, could fashion a crude nuclear device. That wouldn’t give it nuclear deterrence, just a one-off shot at national suicide.
Israel and the US will watch intensely. If Iran is discovered in any activity that looks like it’s building a bomb, it will be struck again. The only real danger is that US attention may wander, but CENTCOM will remain focused.

At this point the reptiles offered a final visual distraction, Iran has warned America's attacks on nuclear sites will have everlasting consequences. The US President Donald Trump is calling on Iran to get back to the negotiating table, but Tehran says it reserves all rights to retaliate. Iran could attack Americans directly with drones and missiles or use proxies in the Middle East. Hezbollah in Lebanon has been massively degraded by Israel; more likely, Iran would use militias it has backed in Iraq or the Houthis in Yemen.

There's really not that much difference between authoritarianism abroad and at home ...



Back to the last gobbet of rousing triumphalism, and warrior bromancer berating Australia for wanting a quiet life ...

For Israel, this has been two weeks of unalloyed triumph. The morale of the society is sky high. So is the unity. Netanyahu doesn’t yet seem to be recovering in the polls but the whole Israeli nation supports what was done in Iran.
For America, here is successful geo-strategic policy and military intervention. Trump will internalise everything about this success. Trump loves success. MAGA itself is changed. This has been a very good few weeks for the Western alliance.
The Albanese government, and therefore Australia, on the other hand, looks as though it can neither comprehend nor affect any of the strategic dynamics that swirl around the world, and that certainly swirl around Australia.

Unalloyed triumph? Possibly, if you like mass starvation and ethnic cleansing and genocide, or perhaps if you like a state of constant tension, and an ever-present desire to go around again and again ...

What a pity he's too old to enlist. What a pity young Australians might yet have to endure the mindless stupidity of Murdochians in yet another foreign adventure.

And now as Leon was mentioned at the start, time to return to him for a final 'toon and a celebration of Snappy Tom's AI ...



And for those interested - the pond can't imagine anyone, but who knows? - here's the second half of that ancient bearded EV story from the lizard Oz in October 2021, just for the record ... so touchingly out of date and deeply irrelevant ...




Friday, June 27, 2025

In an epic Friday, the beefy boofhead and Linda sort things out, our Henry tries to regain his form, and Killer is on hand as a bonus ...


Of late the pond has been approaching Fridays with trepidation. 

Not for the latest word on the madness of King Donald, and talk of his plunging the dollar with his plan to turn the Federal Reserve full mad MAGA, nor for the latest instalment on Robert Kennedy, whether monstering vaccines or admitting no fluoride in water will mean more cavities.

Nor the turn to full fascism, celebrated in the Los Angeles Times' story 'Who are these people?' Masked immigration agents challenge local police, sow fear in L.A.

Increasingly aggressive immigration raids carried out by masked federal agents, sometimes using unmarked vehicles, are creating problems for local law enforcement agencies.
Police have little or no insight into where the federal enforcement actions are taking place but often have to deal with the aftermath, including protests and questions from residents about what exactly happened. In some cases, local cops have been mistaken for federal agents, eroding years of work to have immigrant communities trust the police.
In Bell, chaos erupted when masked men arrived at a car wash and began detaining its workers, sparking a confrontation with residents and immigration rights advocates before they were forced to hastily drive over curbs and street islands to escape.
In Pasadena last week, a man stepped out of his unmarked vehicle at an intersection, unholstered his pistol and aimed it at a group of pedestrians before returning to his car, turning on its red and blue emergency lights and speeding off. Video of the incident went viral.
That incident left the police chief of Pasadena resigned to figure out whether it was a crime or part of a federal raid.
"There's no way for us to verify," Police Chief Gene Harris said.
The department reviewed surveillance footage and other video and saw the credentials on the man's uniform, according to the chief.
"We were able to determine that to the best of our estimation he was an ICE agent. ... We will not look into it any deeper than that," he said.

And so on and on, but that's in another country and besides the pre-fascist wench is long dead.

Nor is there any softening of the worry by the celebrations of Jeff's wedding, as by Emma Brockes in the Graudian ... which led in to this amiable sidetrack on the house style for womyn, featuring the quarry puppy killer...

 ...If there is a Maga look for women it is the one exemplified not only by Sánchez but by Kristi Noem, the head of Homeland Security mockingly nicknamed ICE Barbie for her combination of pageant-style looks and heavy-handed immigration policing, and by Melania Trump, whose eyes are creeping slowly but inexorably up the sides of her temples in what is informally known as “Mar-a-Lago” face.
What’s odd about this style isn’t that it’s augmented, but that it’s an aesthetic which seems deliberately to draw attention to its own artificiality in a way that, in other contexts, might be referred to as “bad work”. People with money can make poor choices about cosmetic surgery too, of course, but the uniformity of this particular look – so heavy on the filler, silicone and Botox as to make its wearers seem not younger, but weirder, and in a state of constant discomfort – suggests something closer to design. If you were the type of person to make liberal references to The Handmaid’s Tale, you might even speculate that this aesthetic has been tailored by the world’s richest men to symbolise just how completely – almost derisively – they can control the bodies of the women around them.

Brockes went to focus on the wedding, while the pond returned to its Friday fear.

The real fear is worrying whether our Henry will be on hand and on song. 

Will there be a sufficient number of historical (or even historic) references, enough to satiate the most discerning reader? Will there be enough to cloak the humbug in a form of pious and learned respectability? 

Of late the old dullard has been off form, so each week the pond is full of saucy doubts and fears.

The pond anxiously skipped past the news ...



The pond hesitated briefly over one story ...

LIVE MIDDLE EAST
‘Iran sites destroyed, obliterated’ Hegseth comes out fighting

The US Defence Secretary insists Iran’s nuclear program was ‘decimated’ by US air strikes last week while the Ayatollah makes his first appearance in a week.
By Lydia Lynch and Agencies.

Decimated? Oh the pond supposes that the old meaning of selecting by lot and killing every tenth man is now long gone, and only our Henry would stand firm against modern deployments of the word.

And then be still, beating heart over on the extreme far right, there was our Henry, top of the reptile digital world ma... and he was sounding right feisty, like a good old Zionist ...



What a relief, and that meant the pond could take in a few entrées before the main course, a couple of rapscallions and time wasters before turning to the main treat. (Yes, stray American readers, no need to fuck with the French language the way Fox's champers Pete did with English)

First up was a tasty dish of the beefy boofhead. 

Usually the pond doesn't worry about politicians trying to pander to News Corp, but the pond will always make an exception for the windmill-hating man from down Goulburn way ...



The pond knew that the beefy boofhead, pure Angus, wouldn't allow for this sort of nonsense, featured elsewhere in the lizard Oz ...

DEFENCE SHOWDOWN
Albanese, other world leaders ‘understood’ why Trump ditched G7 meetings: White House
Anthony Albanese and other world leaders ‘understood’ why they were snubbed by Donald Trump at last week’s G7 meeting, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt says.
Bu Lydia Lynch, Ben Packham and Matthew Cranston

Come on beefy boofhead, show the craven mob how to stand up to big daddy ...

The header: If we help ourselves, US defence support will follow, In Washington, the mood is changing. Allies will need to stand on their own two feet.
The caption, showing the miscreants downcast as the beefy boofhead was about to give them a lesson. (How the reptiles love this snap): Anthony Albanese and Penny Wong hold a press conference at Parliament House in Canberra. Picture: Martin Ollman
The mystical advice the pond only puts in to provide the full reptile experience: This article contains features which are only available in the web version, Take me there

Come on beefy boofhead, show us how to fold in just a four minute read ...

Across the globe, the strategic environment is deteriorating. Conflict in the Middle East continues and has escalated with direct US involvement, Russia grinds forward in a brutal war of attrition in Ukraine, and in our own region, the Chinese Communist Party continues its sweeping military build-up and coercive pressure on its neighbours.
These are not disconnected events. They are symptoms of a more dangerous era where authoritarian regimes are increasingly willing to test the resolve of open societies and the strength of alliances.
One of the lessons from recent months is clear: the United States helps those who help themselves. After Israel struck Iranian-backed targets, the US followed with its own strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. It was a co-ordinated demonstration of consequence, only delivered due to demonstrable capability from a close ally.
It’s crucial we support Israel and the US in their actions and disappointing the government took so long to do so. But the US response must shape how Australia thinks about our own alliance.
The US has underwritten our security for more than 70 years but in today’s world, the alliance must evolve from a legacy we inherit to a responsibility we carry.

So we must still get involved in every foreign adventure, with this mob as our fearless leaders? US President Donald Trump during a news conference with Pete Hegseth, US secretary of defense, left, and Marco Rubio, US secretary of state on the second day of the 2025 NATO Summit.



Pass the pond the smelling salts and carry on ... because surely the war with China by Xmas is at hand ...

The Chinese Communist Party has rapidly expanded its military presence, increasing its naval fleet, missile forces and cyber capabilities. It has not renounced the use of force in the Taiwan Strait and is using its growing military strength to reinforce grey-zone pressure to undermine regional sovereignty. In response, the US has shifted toward a doctrine of denial: making any attempt at coercion or conflict too costly to succeed and preventing it outright if necessary.
Australia must be part of that collective deterrence. That means making it clear we would stand with the US in the event of a Taiwan contingency, not with rhetoric but with serious capability and commitment that means any use of force is destined to fail.
Some call that escalation, but the truth is, it is the only path to peace. Deterrence through denial requires capability to prevent an attack, yet Australia is falling behind. Our navy is shrinking in the face of regional expansion, we produce no guided weapons, recruitment is collapsing and projects face constant delays or reviews.
With this objective, a defence budget of 2 per cent of GDP is not credible. We need a clear, costed pathway to 3 per cent of GDP. But spending more alone is not enough. Every dollar must be spent better so we can maximise capability and readiness.

The reptiles interrupted the beefy boofhead ... by deciding to feature the boofhead starring on Faux Noise down under, Shadow Defence Minister Angus Taylor advocates for Australia to increase its defence spending amid a pledge from most member nations of NATO to lift their spending to five per cent of GDP. “I think it is really important, I think it is positive, I think we do need to see countries around the world upping their defence spend,” Mr Taylor told Sky News Australia. “Authoritarian regimes are flexing their muscles, we’re seeing it, of course, we’ve seen it with Iran, we’ve seen it with Russia, and we are seeing it in the Indo-Pacific as well. “We do need to see democratic countries from the West making sure they are spending what is necessary to make sure we can defend ourselves in these uncertain times.”



Why was the pond reminded of Faux Noise?



Carry on regardless ...

The promise of AUKUS is real but it’s at risk. The US submarine-industrial base is overstretched and delivery will require Australian support. We must co-invest in US shipyard expansion and rapidly scale our own capacity, which means finalising the AUKUS training pipeline, building sovereign maintenance yards and preparing for domestic nuclear regulation.
This requires making decisions. It’s been almost three years since both sides of politics agreed Australia would need an east coast base to support AUKUS submarines and yet the Albanese Labor government still hasn’t chosen a location. This is not what urgency looks like. But this isn’t just about submarines. It’s about whether we can deliver for the alliance when it matters most.
Some say pursuing sovereignty means going it alone, but the truth is, sovereignty is what earns alliance support. In Washington, the mood is changing. The strategic environment dictates a reality: allies will need to stand on their own two feet.
If Australia faces attacks on our critical infrastructure and supply chains, we cannot be entirely reliant on others to respond rapidly and with force. The opportunity is there for Australia to expand on our US alliance, not just asking the US to defend us, but to be an anchor of stability in the region. But that opportunity must be backed by substance.
It also needs to be backed by relationships. It is absolutely essential that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese meets with President Donald Trump to map the path forward.
The AUKUS review may or may not be a pivotal milestone in the relationship and the alliance, but the evolving posture of the US means direct engagement and advocacy for the alliance is now more important than ever.

AUKUS was a dud and is a dud and will continue to be a dud, but the reptiles delivered what every pollie craves. A snap of themselves, just to remind the hive mind of who they are ...Angus Taylor




The reptiles made the snap much bigger, but the pond was anxious to get on to the main course ...

Given reports President Trump is seeking meetings with Indo-Pacific Four nations at NATO, Anthony Albanese should be seizing every opportunity. The fact it’s been almost seven months since the President officially took office and our Prime Minister is yet to secure a face-to-face meeting raises serious concerns about the state of the relationship.
Recently I joined the crew of the USS America as it sailed through Sydney Heads and berthed at Garden Island, on its way to joint exercises with the Australian Defence Force. At 45,000 tonnes, with amphibious forces, fixed-wing aircraft and several thousand personnel aboard. USS America is not just a symbol of US strength, it is a reminder of what serious preparedness looks like. That level of capability doesn’t happen overnight. It takes investment, foresight and political will. Australia must now find that same will before it’s too late.
The world is shifting and the era of post-Cold War stability is ending. The question is whether Australia will rise to the moment or hope that others will carry the weight.
Angus Taylor is shadow minister for defence.

Dear sweet long absent lord, put it another way, standing by to participate in whatever new folly might be devised. But if it's a choice between Chinese cooking and American junk food ...

Okay, with that level of insight, we can go on being completely, comprehensively phukt, but it left the pond in a quandary. 

Is it okay to let the Lib mens blather on without there being a matching woman? Shouldn't there be equal time, just like there's equal representation in the party?

Sheesh, the pond simply had to pay attention to Linda ... doing her best to fix what ails them ...



On the surface, it looked like the reptiles were offering Linda the full deal, top notch reptile treatment.

There was the header, apocalyptic in tone: Liberal Party must embrace past values to move forward, The chances of the Liberal Party marking a 90th anniversary are slim if party ­divisions do not embrace the ­gender values the party was founded on.
There was a caption for the snap of the new fearless leader, made strong by the power of "s": Opposition Leader Sussan Ley. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman
There was the arcane advice: This article contains features which are only available in the web version, Take me there

But there was a problem, and the pond couldn't help but note the imbalance. 

The beefy boofmhead had been given plenty of enlivening snaps, but the reptiles had contained Linda to just one, right at the beginning.

Talk about putting down the female voice, but do go on ...

The once great Liberal Party continues to be electorally smashed.
Australian voters have been repeatedly telling the party that it is rapidly becoming electorally irrelevant – a message the party remains stubbornly resistant to hear and refuses to act upon.
In Sussan Ley, the Liberal Party has its second feminist leader, 80 years after its first. It is not a moment too soon. The survival of this once great political party is again on the line. However, the challenges this time are greater than ever before.
The hard truth that many Liberal Party members are reluctant to accept is that no matter how large or successful it may have been, the future of any political party is never guaranteed.
Like all organisations, political parties must constantly review and reform to remain internally strong, true to core values, and relevant to voters – something the Liberal Party has failed to achieve for some years.
Ley is a leader for modern Australia, but we don’t yet have a party that reflects modern Australia. No matter how strong she is, vision, leadership and sustained genuine teamwork by all ­elements of the party will be required.
The party’s reform starting point must be where Australians are now. Clearly where Australians are now is a willingness to elect, and then re-elect, women in record numbers. The Labor Party, the Greens and the teals understand this. Of the 33 seats lost by the Liberal Party in the past two federal elections, two-thirds were won by women. Women not only win seats from the Liberal Party, they hold them. This is the new normal.
Gender equality was one of the founding principles of our party. I hope the recently announced election review is the first step in gender reform that started, then stalled, over 80 years ago. At its inception, the Liberal Party was the political party the majority of Australian women voted for. It was the party for women’s rights and enfranchisement. Almost unimaginable today.
Sir Robert Menzies was an early feminist and male champion of change.
He, in partnership with the party’s co-founder, Dame Elizabeth Couchman, passionately believed in equal rights for women in all aspect of life, including in politics. Equally, they also believed in a conservative approach to family and social ­cohesion.
Sir Robert demonstrated through his actions and electoral successes that both these liberal and conservative values can coexist and be electorally successful with both men and women.
As Sir Robert observed in his 1943 “Women for Canberra” speech, “For, like most electors I am not half so interested in the sex or social position or worldly wealth of my representatives and rulers as I am in the quality of their minds, the soundness of their characters, the humanity of their experience, the sanity of their policy, and the strength of their wills.”

That's where the visual rubber didn't hit the road. Is it possible to imagine a male treatise extolling the virtues of Sir Ming the Merciless in the lizard Oz, without an accompanying snap of the man? 

The reptiles always feature a snap of this bold, brave feminist, the man who paved the way for the likes of Germaine.

And yet nada, nihil, nothing ...

Linda had done her very best to worship at the feet of the patriarchy, and where did it get her?

Whereas there'd been a snap of the beefy boofhead himself, proud, jaw jutting, handwaving, apparently there was no space in the full to overflowing intertubes for a snap of Linda, despite her craven appeal to Ming and a desire to renew the party by returning it to 1950s thinking.

Poor disadvantaged Linda struggled on as best she could ...

The party’s women’s problem is not misogyny. It has a very long and proud history of political firsts for Australian women. If it was misogynistic, I would have left decades ago. Liberal women are far from the #crumbmaidens the Left on social media insultingly portray.
We are a highly diverse group of driven and successful women who neither identify with socialist policies nor the Left’s language of gendered victimhood.
The party’s real women’s problem, however, is two-fold. The first is that the party’s share of female voters has been steadily declining from more than 50 per cent before 2001 to around 25 per cent today. The mathematical ­reality is that it cannot win elections with this share of female voters. Understanding female voters today will help the party develop policies relevant to modern Australian women – and men, a process Ley has already initiated.
The second real and perhaps most challenging women’s problem is the low percentage of Liberal women elected to Australian parliaments, which for decades has bounced between 15 and 30 per cent. This is a much harder problem for all centre-right parties to address.
Liberal Party members must find a way to rapidly move beyond the pathological aversion to even discussing gender imbalance, never mind addressing it.
This aversion lies in the inherently socialist concept of quotas, which while sitting comfortably within the socialist concept of equality of outcomes, ideologically is an anathema to the centre-right concept of equality of opportunity.
Consequently, when the word quota is uttered, Liberal gender debate is shuttered with “but she has to be preselected on merit, not as a quota”. I dislike the word merit used in this context, not because I disagree with the concept but because the Liberal Party does not have clear, transparent merit-based criteria and it is only ever used in relation to selecting women.
For me, the way forward starts with identifying what merit-based selection means today. It is a deceptively simple but powerful proposition – to preselect the most meritorious Liberal candidate seat by seat, election by election. In the modern Australia we live in, increasingly, merit looks like a capable local woman.
Last year, the Liberal Party ­celebrated its 80th anniversary. The chances of us marking a 90th anniversary are slim if party ­divisions do not embrace the ­gender values the party was founded on. The numbers do not lie. Quotas in some form must be considered and adopted if we are to be realise genuine gender ­reform before it is too late.
Linda Reynolds is an outgoing Liberal senator and former frontbencher

Well done Linda, well played, there's a goodly chance your wise words will soon see the party leave the 1950s for the 1960s. 

Here, have an infallible Pope as your reward. It's no snap of Ming, but it'll have to do...



And so at last to the main course, with the pond at fever pitch, the hot temperature a full Melbourne winter day of 11 degrees, with Our Henry beginning by handing out marks, in his much valued role as headmaster ...



Our Henry would show the bromancer a thing or two about defence, beginning with the header, Bang for the buck? Israel A+, Australia C-, Dollar for dollar Israel’s defence capability puts us to shame.

It's true that we don't have any nukes, and the pond looked forward to our Henry urge we abandon all those wretched treaties, and develop a covert program to nuke the country. Just like Israel ...

The reptiles didn't help by refusing to identify the magnificent plane in the snap, with a caption full of meaningless blather: Defence expenditure is an issue. The fundamental question, however, is whether the government genuinely understands the need to bolster the bulwarks that keep Australia safe. Picture: NewsWire Handout via ADF

There was also the standard injunction: This article contains features which are only available in the web version, Take me there

Then we were there, and it was on, and the pond anxiously scoured Our Henry for germane classical references:

Over the period from 2020 to 2023, Australia’s total defence expenditure exceeded Israel’s by more than $50bn, which, even in this day and age, is real money. Yet no one seriously believes the Australian Defence Force could have achieved a fraction of what Israel has achieved since war broke out on October 7, 2023.
Many factors are at work. But a difference in mindset is surely among them. Our government seems to think peace is the natural condition of mankind, and that “restraint” and “de-escalation” are sufficient to secure it. It therefore downplays existential threats and treats defence spending as a regrettable cost of doing business, whose efficacy is a second order concern.
Israelis too hanker for peace, every bit as much as we do. But confronted with adversaries intent on their destruction, they know national survival hinges on credible deterrence – which requires the demonstrated capability to strike hard and fast.

As an aside, that's surely true, because they hanker for a piece of the West Bank, and more of a piece of Jerusalem and the whole of a piece of Gaza, destined to become the new Riviera once the ethnic cleansing is complete.

Apologies for the interruption.

And they also know that had they heeded the incessant calls for restraint, ceasefires and de-escalation, Hamas would still have undisputed control of Gaza, Hezbollah would still run Lebanon, Syria would still be ruled by a murderous tyrant and Iran would still be poised to unleash a formidable array of offensive military capabilities.

And Israel might nuke the lot of them, but the reptiles paused for a dose of good old Shoe, in an AV distraction, Strategic Analysis Australia Director Michael Shoebridge says China is a “growing military and security challenge” in the Asia Pacific Region amid NATO countries’ pledge to boost their defence spending amid Russian aggression. “How great to have a general, a retired general, be able to speak so candidly and honestly about issues we don’t hear a peep out of … from our senior serving military people or the ministers in charge of defence,” Mr Shoebridge told Sky News host Steve Price. “China is an aggressive, growing military and security challenge in our region, and unlike the Europeans, NATO has 32 members facing Russia. “Our collective effort doesn’t look impressive compared to what we’ve just seen in Europe.”



Then came something of a billy goat butt, and the judges had to be called in to consider whether a reference to the Treaty of Hudaibiyya qualified as a proper classical flourish ...

To say that is not to claim that Israel has definitively vanquished its enemies. Although dramatically weakened, Hamas and Hezbollah remain viable entities and the Iranian theocracy’s grip on power appears undiminished.
As for the latest ceasefire, Iran and its proxies have repeatedly proved they adhere to the principle the Prophet Mohammed established when he approved the Treaty of Hudaibiyya: that the sole legitimate purpose of a truce (“hudna”) with the infidels is so as to rearm and fight again.
To make things worse, the ceasefire lacks any enforcement mechanism, above and beyond Donald Trump’s exhortations, which are unlikely to frighten the mullahs. A regime that sends over 20,000 children, armed only with the promise of paradise, to a certain death as human minesweepers – as Iran’s theocracy did in its war with Iraq – will scarcely be cowed by words alone.
As a result, Israel will have little choice but to assure compliance by retaliating forcefully against violations, as it has had to do with Hezbollah. And should it turn out that Iran’s nuclear capacity has not been eradicated, it may well need to resume the conflict.

Yes, and there's also that little job of finishing the ethnic cleansing and turning Gaza into the new Riviera, and then came a double bunger snap, joined by text.. The government simply cannot bring itself to see any merit in Benjamin Netanyahu... just as it struggles to say anything favourable about Donald Trump.



The judges again had to consider whether a simple-minded joke about Pax Romana qualified as a legitimate classical reference, or was simply monumentally stupid ...

To declare a “Pax Trumpiana” would therefore be premature. But it would be equally wrong to understate the gains Israel has already secured.
It is a rough, but statistically verifiable, rule of thumb that even states that have only lost a third of their war-waging capabilities take a decade to fully recover – and it seems likely the damage to Iran and its proxies exceeds that threshold. When the war began, their military facilities, including thousands of heavily armed missiles, posed an immediate threat; now the missiles and launch pads are largely smouldering piles of rubble, as are at least two of Iran’s three major nuclear facilities.
One might hope our government would acknowledge that achievement, whose benefits extend far beyond the Middle East. But unlike Germany’s Chancellor, Friedrich Merz, who praised Israel for doing the West’s “dirty work”, there is not a single instance in which it has.
That may be because it simply cannot bring itself to see any merit in Benjamin Netanyahu, just as it struggles to say anything favourable about Donald Trump.
It is, however, a mark of intellectual maturity to recognise that the good work of the world is not always done by those who are good; and that all too often, those who come cloaked in the mantle of goodness are dangerous bumblers, as the presidency of Barack Obama so conclusively showed. It was not because of his tender soul that Hamlet helped Denmark achieve a better form of government; it was because he had the good fortune of having the ferociously aggressive and ambitious Fortinbras as his neighbour.
But what is involved here is not merely giving credit where credit is due. By refusing to acknowledge Israel’s achievements, the government is closing its eyes to the war’s lesson: that the world is an extremely dangerous place, in which aggression by totalitarian regimes needs to be met not with an open hand but by a mailed fist. And in denying that fact, it doesn’t just mislead itself: it misleads Australians about the realities we have to confront.

The pond was starting to feel concerned. Was this another dud week for the master? It didn't help that the reptiles trotted out another European in search of his daddy, German Chancellor, Friedrich Merz praised Israel for doing the West’s “dirty work”. Picture: Getty Images



Then came a glimmer of hope ... a measure of Hobbes to enhance the full Zionist cant ...

As Hobbes, with his brutal realism, put it, despite the “uselesse cant” (a word derived from the French for the whining of beggars) about “Right and Wrong, Justice and Injustice”, there are circumstances in which only the “calamity of a warre” – “the greatest evil that can happen in this life” – can “instruct” states intent on “Molesting other Nations” about the value of peace.
That is not to counsel recklessness or glorify military adventures. On the contrary, like Thucydides, of whom he was one of the first and best translators, Hobbes reserved the greatest praise for those who combine the capacity for bold action with the “mindful prudence” that carefully identifies and manages risks.
The Israel Defence Force has repeatedly displayed that virtue – described by Thucydides as the “measured daring” that keeps “hubris in check and defeatism at bay” – in its audacious attack on Iran, and it may have to call on it again. If the job has to be finished, it is surely best to strike soon, while Iran’s air defences remain in tatters.
It is no doubt true that Trump wants the ceasefire to endure; but for all of his outbursts, both he and JD Vance have said that it is precisely Israel’s willingness to shoulder the burden of conflict and, where necessary, take the initiative, that makes it an ideal ally – as compared to the free riders who have been infantilised by their long-term dependence on the American security blanket.

Thucydides?! At last, our Henry had returned to form.

But would it last, would he go on with the job, or would he perform like an Australian batting line up?

The reptiles  didn't help by interrupting with another dose of good old Shoe ...Strategic Analysis Australia Director Michael Shoebridge says Australia cannot afford its military beyond “a few weeks” if defence spending is only boosted to 2.33 per cent by 2033, calling for an aggressive uptick in military expenditure. “Anyone that has a calculator and that knows anything about our defence force knows that the 2 per cent we’re spending right now on defence … we cannot afford the defence force that we are buying,” Mr Shoebridge told Sky News host Steve Price. “A small conventional force that can’t last beyond a few weeks with the supplies it has. “We have champagne taste with cordial income.”



Why is the pond always reminded of good old Shoe in Wag the Dog at these moments?

Sad to say, in the pond's opinion, our Henry failed the test. 

A couple of references amid the triumphalism and the rampant Zionism simply wasn't good enough, and quoting champers Pete and Richard Nixon approvingly suggested the pompous old pontificator had reached an even lower than usual bottom ...

Sheltered from the responsibility of paying for their own defence, those free riders (or better, cheap riders) have been content to pursue the good life while demanding, as Pete Hegseth aptly commented, that the US bear greater costs and risks to protect their security than they are willing to bear for themselves.
Americans have chaffed at that since the 1960s, when Richard Nixon, who considered the Europeans “damn poor partners”, declared “our position, in a nutshell is this: it is essential for the Europeans to improve their capabilities”. The difference now is that Trump will not allow the situation to continue. With America caught between a fiscal crisis and staggering demands on its capabilities, his successors won’t either, regardless of their partisan affiliation.
We cannot escape that change’s consequences. Yes, defence expenditure is an issue. The fundamental question, however, is whether the government genuinely understands the need to bolster the bulwarks that keep Australia safe. Until it does, the billions we spend on defence will be mere dross. They may fool us. They can’t, and won’t, fool anyone else.

Uh huh ...we must nuke the country so we can achieve peace through war and obtain our Nobel prize:



Or you could bomb Cambodia. That's always a good way ...

And so to a special bonus, because the pond, in a day of musts, must also allow time for Killer of the IPA ...



The header: There’s no moral high ground in state censorship, Australia is on track to end up with a censorship industrial complex, developed via ostensibly democratic means, that looks similar to those imposed by the dictatorships we’re told to loath.
The caption: Australia's eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant addresses the National Press Club. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman
The never ending command: This article contains features which are only available in the web version, Take me there

Killer was in his usual state of outrage:

Did you know “staring or leering” can be a criminal offence in Victoria? So is “shouting insults” and “unwanted sexualised comments”. Courtesy of Victorian taxpayers, Melbourne tram passengers are reminded daily that they live in a state where the right to free speech, let alone free eye movement, has become a relic of a bygone era.
“Experience it or witness it? Report it to police. Text STOP IT to 0499 455 455,” reads a prominent government advertisement aimed at aggrieved parties, or even annoyed bystanders, keen to waste police resources and potentially ruin someone’s life for the hell of it.
The idea that sensible people apparently could think these laws are reasonable or enforceable, rather than a legal crutch to arbitrarily persecute politically disfavoured groups over frivolous nonsense, is a depressing sign of our times.
It is borne of an insidious totalitarian mindset that seeks to control thought and action whatever the cost. Perhaps these advertisements were a special shock to me, having returned recently from the US, where even in lefty California they would be unthinkable. For all its faults California has the strongest constitutional free speech protections of any US state.

Immediately the reptiles piled on by sending in the dog botherer to do a bit of dog bothering, Sky News host Chris Kenny says eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant is on a “power trip” with her push to include YouTube in the government’s social media ban. The eSafety Commissioner has sought to dictate policy to the government, pushing to reverse YouTube’s exemption from the government's social media ban for under 16s. “This YouTube step just highlights all the grey areas that we are worried about here,” Mr Kenny said.



To be fair to the reptiles, the pond is also deeply irritated by what is being proposed, but from the viewpoint of privacy.

The notion that everyone should be forced to hand over their details to a mob like YouTube to prove that they're adults is a step too far ...

There is however, a solution, and a relatively cheap one at that.

Get yourself a VPN, with the added advantage that you can indulge in piracy and make use of geolimited offerings.

That noted, don't expect the reptiles to provide practical advice about subverting the government's attempts to legislate conformity. 

Just expect the usual ranting and stamping of feet, and talk of boiling frogs ...

Australia appears to be caught in a boiling frog situation, where legislators are continually chipping away at whatever is left of free speech until it’s too late. A sudden burst of anti-Semitism in NSW and Victoria last year prompted a wholesale reduction in the rights of Australians, likely never to be unwound, at the state and federal level with almost no public debate.
The once admirable push to remove section 18c of the federal Racial Discrimination Act, which makes it illegal to “offend or humiliate”, has disintegrated. Victoria’s legislative updates, passed in April, were unsurprisingly the worst, crippling speech rights for seven million Australians overnight.
The Justice Legislation Amendment (Anti-Vilification and Social Cohesion) Act 2025 makes it illegal to “severely ridicule” any politically favoured group based on “race, religion, disability, gender identity, sex, sexual orientation”. There’s no need for any intent to upset, truth is no defence, and individuals can even claim harm vicariously via what’s called “personal association”.
An extraordinary array of behaviours could now be illegal: stand-up comedy, publication of data on crime or educational achievement by ethnicity, quotation of Bible passages or criticism of our out-of-control immigration intake. Amid a shocking surge in crime in Melbourne prosecutors should have better things to do. I promise to text “STOP IT” if I do see any suspicious leering on the morning commute.
The best that can be said of these news laws and their drafters is they mean well, but they are unlikely to be wielded in good faith. “Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime,” is likely to be the guiding principle to laws that essentially criminalise the ordinary messy business of life.
Perhaps out of extreme embarrassment for misjudging everything during the pandemic, the federal bureaucracy is also increasingly obsessed with censorship too.

Oh FFS, not the pandemic again. 

Why is Killer such a one note scribbler? On the upside there was no talk of masks, though the pond has taken to wearing them on the trams, such is the way that Covid is again doing the rounds in the deep south, as the reptiles interrupted with a snap that mentioned the chief villainess ... eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant demanded social media platforms take down videos of the stabbing of Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel in Sydney last year



The pond isn't full Killer libertarian, and suspects the government might yet again be persuaded to fold as they appreciate what a shit storm they'll be creating, roughly equivalent to Texans being deprived of Pornhub ...

There's no doubt that there's lots of material that minors shouldn't be able to access on the full to overflowing intertubes, and thank the long absent lord that the lizard Oz has a paywall so that exposure to the reptiles is limited to those who can pay for the dubious pleasure ... and if the government does pursue its folly, think about a VPN ...

In a speech at the National Press Club this week, eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant was demanding the government try to prevent children 16 and under looking at YouTube – in effect curbing parents’ rights to determine what’s best for their children. Again, curbing the amount of trash kids watch might appear laudable but it’s also unworkable and buttering up voters for further, more intrusive rounds of censorship.
The slippery slope isn’t a logical fallacy here: Inman Grant has already demanded social media platforms take down videos she didn’t like for whatever reason, most bizarrely the stabbing of Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel in Sydney last year, when far more gruesome content is readily available.
Last year she demanded X remove a post by Melbourne woman Celine Baumgarten, who had questioned publicly whether a “Queer Club” was appropriate at a primary school.

At this point the reptiles introduced another argument for limiting children's access, by featuring unlovely Rita, onetime meter maid ... Sky News host Rita Panahi discusses the eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant's attempt to ban YouTube for children. “A survey by the eSafety Commissioner earlier this year found YouTube was the most used platform by ten to 15-year-olds,” Ms Panahi said. “She is arguing in her speech … around seven in ten kids report being exposed to harmful online content.”



Then it was on to the final Killer rant ...

My biggest fear of what the Albanese government might do is to revive the so-called Combating Misinformation and Disinformation Bill, which it withdrew from parliament last year. The idea that bureaucrats can arbitrate truth is ludicrous. The bill would unleash a federal censorship apparatus that would make Beijing proud, in effect stopping ordinary Australians from disagreeing with established political and scientific conventional wisdom.
Only mainstream media outlets would be exempt – perhaps a sneaky ruse by the government to gain support for this bill in an age where social media can help ordinary citizens see through government propaganda.
Were the law in place during the pandemic, the dissenters who were ultimately proved right, who hastened the end of destructive mandates, would have been muzzled. Going forward, governments wouldn’t be able to resist stifling criticism of increasingly ridiculous climate change or immigration policies.
We’re creating a society where politicians in parliament and the mainstream media have far more free speech rights than the ordinary citizen. In Britain, police are making 30 arrests a day for “offensive” online messages, according to a recent report in The Times of London. Expect similar wastes of policing resources here too once the new raft of laws and potential laws ramps up.
Amid calls to increase defence spending massively, presumably to defend “our values” from those dastardly totalitarian regimes, it’s worth asking what “our values” are exactly; they appear to have shifted significantly in recent decades.

Say what? Why does Killer need to ask about values? 

Surely it's the right to rampant Zionism in the Australian Daily Zionist News, and the right to indulge in a sacking of an ABC casual announcer for daring to mention mass starvation is a war crime ...

Never mind, time to wrap it up ...

Indeed, Australia is on track to end up with a censorship industrial complex, developed via ostensibly democratic means, that looks depressingly similar to those imposed by the dictatorship we are told to loath. I’m no expert in Chinese law but I doubt wolf whistles have been criminalised as they have been in Melbourne.
If we want to keep the moral high ground we must tell our politicians to STOP IT, not each other.
Adam Creighton is chief economist at the Institute of Public Affairs.

The pond has to admit the reptiles move around, with his day providing excellent examples.

There's the IPA's chief economist scribbling about a "censorship industrial complex" and wondering about massive defence spending, while our Henry, allegedly an economist, rabbits on about the urgent need for a massive increase in defence spending.

Children need to be sheltered from all this kerfuffle ... you there, how did you get in here, go to your room.

Perhaps big daddy will help, with a stern spanking or at least a fawning bunch of children anxious to appease him. Take it away immortal Rowe ...