Monday, June 14, 2021

In which the pond scores the usual drone, drone from the Major and the Caterist ...

 

 

It started, as if often does for the pond, with a reading of the Weekly Beast.  It's a bit of a shaggy dog story, with detours, and a bit of cancel culture along the way, and the lizard Oz editorialist setting the hare in motion with a defamatory remark ...

The Australian’s editorial reminded the two award-winning investigative journalists that their former colleagues had long memories about their “habits”. Was this a threat?
“Many senior people at the Australian know well the work, the habits and the hubris of Sally Neighbour and Louise Milligan,” the editorial said, going on to imply that ABC journalists listened to disaffected people on social media.
It concluded: “The most dangerous enemy of the journalist is bad, lazy, deceitful journalism.” The condemnation of the editorial came thick and fast.

No need to regurgitate all of the beast, though the cancel culture bit is worth a note, because a certain Mr Holmes complained he'd been cancelled ...



Back to the beast to discover what the reptiles had actually published in lieu of their cancel culture effort with a certain Mr Holmes...

It was hard to find any support for the Australian’s stance, except for a couple of letters on the paper’s letters page.
One correspondent said it “should be compulsory reading for journalism teachers and students”.
Another said the “landmark editorial on journalistic standards needs nothing added” but someone should take on the ABC over a requirement to sign in to iview.

But why would you bother to sign in to iView to be swamped by Communist-inspired propaganda?

Never mind, the pond's journey took it to Jenna Price at The Canberra Times asking why journalists don't sue for defamation more often ... (outside the paywall for the moment).

And there the pond discovered something it would love to beg, borrow or steal ...

Without wishing to further harm either of the two journalists, the editorial attacks the ABC and the two women. It does the usual Murdoch thing of saying how big and expensive the ABC is - drone, drone - and then finishes by saying: "Many senior people at The Australian know well the work, the habits and the hubris of Sally Neighbour and Louise Milligan ... the most dangerous enemy of the journalist is bad, lazy, deceitful journalism."

Drone, drone! 

 In two simple words, Price conjured up what the pond had thought was a case of tinnitus. It was drone, drone; the pond had a case of reptiles in the ears!

And then Price did even better. She asked the Major! And as even stray readers of the pond on a Monday know, always ask the Major Mitchell ...

Hmm. I asked around. The man most familiar with the work of these two, Chris Mitchell, a former editor-in-chief of The Australian, thought the sentence in the editorial mentioning the two journalists was "very odd". He worked with Neighbour closely, with Milligan less so. He recalls fighting hard to keep Neighbour from going to television.
"Both of them left the paper in completely good stead, valued; and I like them both and I would have taken Sally back if I was still there," says Mitchell. He was also, he says, on the judging panel for Australia's most prestigious international reporting awards, the Lowy Institute awards, which gave Four Corners its media prize in 2019.

Hmm. That almost verged on apostasy, or at least heresy. "Very odd" is pretty severe in the Major's world when it comes to talking of fellow reptiles ... though perhaps not as severe as others ...

As Muller says, "It was nasty, incoherent and hypocritical, [coming] as it does from an organisation which has been described by a British parliamentarian as an organised crime syndicate."

...and so the pond looked forward eagerly to the Major's outing this day, knowing deep in the pond's heart that the Major was certain to disappoint. He always does, just like the pollies in The Wire ...


 

Yes, the Major had returned to the "very odd" ranks with nary a blink of the eye, happily at work with the ogranised crime syndicate and chiming in to support simpleton Sharri, who lurked at the top of the page again ...

 


 

The pond couldn't quite work out the point of these bats in the belfrey, sorry bats in the lab. Was simplistic Sharri, in her EXCLUSIVE, suggesting that the lab had indulged in poor safety standards, and so the virus jumped from bats to humans? Or was she proposing that the lab had deliberately extracted the virus and launched it on the Chinese people as an experiment? Or was it an accidental transfer from something to sombeody? And what would a scientific expert of the Sharri kind know anyway?

In the end, the pond didn't much care, and instead did what everybody does on a Monday. Ask the Major! And all the Major could suggest was that there was a story there, somewhere, and maybe someday somebody would find it, which was being a bit harsh on simpleton Sharri, because the pond thought she'd already solved the mystery completely ...

 


 

Physics? For a biology issue? Nope, the pond would Ask the Major ... you know, for actual evidence, as opposed to further reading ... or more navel fluff gathering with simpleton Sharri ...

 


 

Uh huh. So all we've got is the usual hints, suspicions and such like, intermingled with a lot of rehashing of the reptile drone, drone kind, on the basis that if you repeat something often enough, it must be true ...

 


 

Indeed, indeed, it's all the fault of those who doubted the Donald ...

 


 

There really was a tweet for everything until the wittering and the twittering stopped ... and so to one last gobbet of Ask the Major ... drone, drone ...

 



 

The real story of the century? Perhaps to a criminal organisation given to droning on ... but in the meantime, what about an insurrectionist in the ranks, and the attitude of the G 7 to coal?

And that's the pond's segue to look at the rest of the competition in this day's reptile ranks ...

 

 



It's a strong field. There's the Oreo rabbiting on about climate policy and the ALP ... drone, drone ... and the bromancer doing his best for SloMo ... drone, drone ... chipping in to support the story at the top of the digital page ...




Ah, the reptile war on China, how spiffingly well it goes ... and elsewhere there was more drone, drone ...



Drone, drone ....so bizarre, so truly odd, so deeply weird, this reptile fascination with the ABC. How many want to switch ships, and swap their reptile rags for a decent cardy?

Never mind, there could be only one more reptile called this day, the number had to be one, and in lieu of the Oreo blathering about climate science and climate policy and such like, why not that master of utter tedium, the Caterist? Drone, drone ...

 


 

Before beginning, how about an anxiety-relieving, stress-reducing cartoon?

 


 

Might the Caterist one day see the light on the hill? Nope, it's government cash in the paw for the drone, drone that moves the Caterist ...

 


 

Of course elsewhere in the reptile rag this day, there were hints of reality, and hand-wringing, and perhaps a little sense of fear ...

 


 

Oh yes, it's a burning issue for some, but not for the Caterist, always willing to dismiss talk of the climate and catastrophe, with a sneer and a shrug, as might be expected of a man who is addicted to an infusion of government cash in the paw ...
 


 

What to say, what to expect? Drone, drone ... mere cant from the cash in the paw man, with the usual bout of indignation, and never mind actual science, because what use is that?

 


 

Yes, it seems that climate science denialism remains a professional business these days, at least if you happen to be a happy recipient of cash in the paw from a federal government still incapable of seeing the light on the hill, still deeply in love with coal ... and as for that less than perfect understanding of the climate, how strange coming from a man who displayed an astonishing ability to discern the mystical patterns flood waters make while  moving through quarries ...

And so to a last short gobbet of drone, drone ...

 


 

Yep, talking of the bonfire of the vanities, where's the problem in setting the world on fire, provided you get a little coal and federal government cash in the paw ... and now, for those distressed by the pond ignoring the Oreo, a little teaser, a little sampler, or if you will, drone drone ...



 

The coal realists! Is that code for Joel? Has the pond got it right yet again? Because fucking the world is just realism, and doing something about climate science is mere idealism! You see, it was just more drone, drone ... and so while the pond appreciated the noble effort by the reformed, recovering feminist, there was no need for that drone, drone, because the Caterist had the matter, and the cash in the paw, well in hand ...

And so to wrap up with a few more cartoons on matters studiously avoided by the reptiles this day ... (ssh, no mention of Q or insurrectionists in the ranks) ...




 

10 comments:

  1. Small edit for the Oreo: "Where is the cost-benefit analysis, comprehensive modelling and strategic plan - Labor could take the case for the gas-fired power station at Kurri Kurri as an exemplar"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not if they want it financed by banks/asset managers, Anony. And we know that Labor can't ever propose government financing; they did that once back in the 1940s and produced such a foofaraw with a debt so huge that Menzies and the Libs remained in power for 23 years until it was (nearly) all paid back again.

      Delete
  2. Hi Dorothy,

    “…Make it clear that because of a certain feature of the Sars-CoV-2 gene responsible for Covid-19 - specifically the double CGG sequence spliced at the furin cleavage site - the chances of mutation emerging in nature are about one billion to one.”

    As has been pointed out over and over again the Reptiles really don’t do science.

    A billion to one may seem like long odds but when you consider that just one infected person can carry between 1 billion and 100 billion SARS-CoV-2 virions during peak infection then the chances of a small genetic mutation occurring that increases the potency of the virus becomes much more likely.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7685332/

    The Major and his minions simply can’t get their heads around how powerful a process evolution is, especially with something as fast replicating as a virus. They are just like creationists needing a sentient engineer to explain how reality occurred. This time the creator has to be some monstrous “bat-woman” who can be blamed for the pandemic, instead of a random coding error.

    DiddyWrote

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Major rattling off terms like furin cleavage site and double CGG sequence sounds a lot one of those infomercials for face cream that breathlessly tell you about hyaluronic acid. I wonder how the Major would respond to a few questions about the processes involved? I suspect it's all cut and paste from various conspiracy sites.

      From what I am reading, scientists are responding as they usually do, saying what is likely based on the information available and not ruling things in or out entirely. However the lab leak hypothesis doesn't look likely at this time.

      https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01529-3

      With relation to the points the Major parrots.

      "many other coronaviruses have furin cleavage sites, such as coronaviruses that cause colds. Because viruses containing the site are scattered across the coronavirus family tree, rather than confined to a group of closely related viruses, Stephen Goldstein, a virologist at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, says the site probably evolved multiple times because it provides an evolutionary advantage."

      "In SARS-CoV-2, about 3% of the nucleotides encoding arginine are CGG, he says. And he points out that around 5% of those encoding arginine in the virus that caused the original SARS epidemic are CGG, too".

      Delete
    2. From the Nature article: "Some say that SARS-CoV-2 spreads among people so readily that it must have been created with that intention." Now the 'black death' plague also spread very quickly - even more quickly than SARS-CoV-2 - amongst humans, and it originated from China, so clearly the Chinese must have had very sophisticated genetic manipulation capabilities back in the late middle ages. Mustn't they ?

      It's truly a joy reading the likes of the Maj. Mitch and Sharri rabbiting on about things they know absolutely nothing about. But then, that's all the time with them.

      David Baltimore, btw, has a Nobel Prize in 'Physiology or Medicine' back in 1975 and he is now 83, so has he truly kept up with virology in the 21st C ? Hence his obvious backdown into “there are other possibilities and they need careful consideration, which is all I meant to be saying”. And what exactly does he mean by "other possibilities" ? Either evolution or human intervention - what "other possibilities" could he be referring to ?

      Delete
    3. Great fun DW, and the reason why the pond only runs the reptiles so it can read the comments section ...

      Delete
  3. Will we be expecting a firestorm tomorrow after Four Corners runs a story about Promo's QAnon mate?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was so interesting that I fell asleep after the first 5 minutes. Did anything noteworthy emerge ? Like maybe the guy who talks in tongues to invisible friends and lays on hands and is "doing God's work" confessed to some awful misdemeanor or two ?

      Delete
    2. Nothing noteworthy emerged GB, just a man so deep into his own delusions that he's singularly incapable of dealing with the delusions of others, or the sight of a family in deep pain ...

      Delete
    3. A real damp squib. I guess its back to the culture wars then.

      Delete

Comments older than two days are moderated and there will be a delay in publishing them.