Yesterday the pond was left in awe and admiration at the rigid self-discipline and unnerving control the reptiles showed when confronted by that ProPublica story about the filthy rich being filthy tax dodgers. Sure it was old news, everyone knew they'd been doing it for years, how else was Jeff going to be able to piss in a bottle in space as an inspiration to his employees, but still there were facts and figures ...
And yet ... and yet ... not a single mention of the chairman, just a question about who topped the charts ... and yet, and yet, elsewhere the chairman had been mentioned in despatches as a top notch player, up there with the best of them...
Come on reptiles, be proud, be out, be boastful. The chairman was named as a champion. Details, please!
And so to today's standard reptile fare, and these days, whenever the Killer is on the prowl, the pond pays attention ...
Ah that dreadful Kiwi wutch from across the dutch, that's sure to trigger Killer, almost as much as a Wolf might be triggered by a bear ...
Well the pond wouldn't call it super funny, but when it's Killer's soul mate, the pond will take its humour wherever it can find it ...
Indeed, indeed, it's truly terrifying. Perhaps what Killer needs is some quiet relief, a space where he's not tormented ...
By now, it's apparent that the pond has not the slightest interest in Killer's actual content, but what a wonderful coat hanger it makes for stories of natural peace and calm ...
This is all very well, and it's good to stoke the fear, but why isn't Killer quoting his soul mate, the Wolf outside the door?
Never mind, this is the last of the Killer's uploads for the day ...
No, no, you can't fool the Killer, or perhaps even the children of the revolution ... but when will he have the courage to go full Wolf at the door?
And so to the pond's usual Thursday treat ... with the competition not in the running ...
The pond is pleased to acknowledge the noble ongoing hagiographic work of the bromancer, hailing the pragmatic PM as the war on China cranks up another notch, but had an unnerving sense of déjà vu.
The pond was also pleased to note the lizard Oz editorialist resigning so that he or she might immediately enlist, and defend freedom, while all the pond could offer was a white feather donning blog.
And then there was the venerable Sexton, turned royal watcher, which the pond deemed too weird, though perhaps it might be ideal preparation for a column in New Idea ...
No, it had to be the savvy Savva dissing SloMo, there was simply no viable or credible alternative ...
Now reading the savvy Savva is not without risks. Last week, the pond was unnerved when the mutton Dutton was held up by her as a viable alternative, and this week her desire to see SloMo done down has seen her take to the job of coaching Albo.
But the onion muncher as an example? Take a leaf out of his playbook?
Not to worry, let the savvy Savva take us on a journey ...
Oh fucketty fuck, just when the pond had managed to remove much of the unsightly scarring left from the onion muncher years ... with just a few cartoons for companionship ...
Does the savvy Savva have the first clue about the torture she's proposing?
Look, the pond understands undiluted scorn for SloMo. The pond itself has troubles with loons speaking in tongues to imaginary friends. But the pond still remembers those bitter years in the wilderness, where nattering negativity and ludditism overwhelmed the country ...
The only people to survive were the cartoonists, who made out like infallible papal bandits ...
Dear sweet long absent lord, not the onion muncher ... dressed up in all his humanity and charming the savvy Savva ...
Look, the pond gets it, any cudgel in a storm, any Rhett at the door not giving a damn, any chance to damn SloMo, for his cruel, inhumane and frankly deeply un-Xian ways ...
Yes, yes, all that and more, but the onion muncher?
Oh it's a bridge too far, almost as far a bridge as the mutton Dutton, but at least the pond will always have the infallible Pope ... this day bringing back to mind the noble efforts of the hagiographic bromancer with preps for the foreign tour and a big, reptile-approved, pragmatic drum to bang ...
"...that ProPublica story about the filthy rich being filthy tax dodgers"
ReplyDeleteYep, they sure get away with it. As indeed they do out here:
Some of Australia’s highest earners pay no tax, and it costs them a fortune
https://www.theguardian.com/business/grogonomics/2021/jun/08/some-of-australias-highest-earners-pay-no-tax-and-it-costs-them-a-fortune
So far, so good; but then the ProPublica folks go on with: "...the wealthiest can - perfectly legally - pay income taxes that are only a tiny fraction of the hundreds of millions, if not billions, their fortunes grow each year." The only problem with that is that for them to pay taxes on how much their wealth grows, then that is a wealth tax, not an income tax, and neither America nor Australia has a wealth tax.
And just as well: my house and land cost about $80,000 when I bought it and it's now worth about $900,000. If we had a wealth tax, I'd have had to pay tax on the $820,000 increase in my "wealth". And I'd rather not - how about you ?
Anyway, most of the wealth increase comes from such things as increases in the price of shares that they own. So ok, if their share holdings increase in value, then they should pay tax. But what happens in those times - moderately frequent - when the value of their share portfolio significantly decreases - such times are known as 'recessions' - do they get a large tax rebate to compensate ?
And if, perhaps, they have to sell some of their shares to pay the 'wealth tax', then that significantly decreases their wealth - another tax rebate, perhaps ?
All your base are belong to us, Dr Naomi Wolf. :)
ReplyDeleteKiller C is a true joy. Here he goes: "For 15 months they [democratic governments] have trotted out fear-mongering slogans about "saving lives", "staying alert" or (in Britain) "clapping for carers" on Thursday night."
ReplyDeleteNow let's consider: the 'official' COVID death count in the USA is now near 620,000 - though the 'real' count is believed to be well over 900,000. But taking the official count as 620,000 in a population of about 335 million, then what would be the corresponding number for Australia.
Well, we have 25.5/335=0.07612 mulitplied by 620,000 = 47194. So if Australia had the same death rate as the USA, then 47,194 Aussies would have died from COVID. In fact, just 910 Aussies died from COVID including the 820 who died in Victoria. So: a huge relative success for Australia, and does anybody really not understand why Victoria is just a little bit paranoid about it all ?
Yes, Killer Creighton doesn't understand, and never will.
It seems like they have spent so long agonising over 10th order issues that the cannot recognise a real issue when it turns up. Add to this a remarkable lack of curiosity about just about everything that matters and you get the sort of confusion you see in the Killer.
Delete