The pond noted a number of stories during the week - beefy Angus in fine form in The Graudian - it takes exceptional skill to get the likes of Concetta Fierravanti-Wells offside - and there was another story in The Graudian, Earth is trapping 'unprecedented' amount of heat, Nasa says.
But the pond thought it best to let the reptiles stew in their juices for another day, and decided to bump prattling Polonius up the Q ...
The pond does love a good conspiracy, and Polonius was in top form, drawing attention to something Scotty from marketing is desperate to make go away ... with scribbling friends like these, who needs enemies?
Clearly the Prime Minister doesn’t believe in some wacko conspiracy that leftist satanic pedophiles have corrupted governments around the world and only Donald Trump can save us. That would be insane.
The Prime Minister simply believes that the earth and all living things were created in 6 days around 6000 years ago and the world will end with the rapture and all good believers being lifted up to heaven. Nothing insane about that.
This is of course terribly unfair. There's no evidence that SloMo is a young earther. He merely believes that he can speak in tongues to an imaginary friend, heal by the laying on of hands, and shortly, not long to go now, the rapture will indeed arrive ... which is just as well, because by 2050, he'll be close on 82 and ready to see the wonders worked by his emissions ...
There was another comment below the Crikey yarn by a garrulous chittychatty:
Thankfully during those 6 days, there was time to sequester loads of carbon in the earth so the LibNats could dig it up & burn it today… Geez, “He” really thought of everything!
Another error. She thought of everything, as She always does ...
But enough with the light-hearted banter, the pond thought it might indulge in one of its notorious cut and pastes, and as Polonius decided it would ignore Crikey, which has claims to having set the story running long ago, why not give them first go?
Oh it's rich stuff, but talking of violent rituals, imagine getting inside Polonius's head and contemplating what he'd really like to do to the ABC ... it'd be a simulation of a near death experience ...
Yes, but it isn't just the ABC, is it? And seeing as how Polonius has had his turn, fair dibs says that Crikey must have another go ...
Well if he has something to hide, you can rely on Polonius's prattle to help him with the hiding ...
Now the pond is only the cut and paster, and will leave others to sort out what might be going down here, but the pond does wish that Polonius's unrelenting obsession with the ABC meant that apparently he couldn't spend a nanosecond attacking Crikey.
Sure it's only a small indie publisher, and the lifting of the paywall to attract interest is a desperate ploy, and sure, the pond can get behind the paywall, but usually doesn't run Crikey pieces, because the pond only likes to take on the larger, bloated, tax avoiding corporations of the Murdochian kind, but really ... all that said, fair dibs, the bastards are clearly in league with the ABC, and deserve a good Polonial lashing ...
Sorry, it's terribly hard for Polonius, and inevitably, for his final gobbet, Polonius turned to other matters, because when obsessed with the ABC, why stop at just one story?
That last par is an egregious lie, even by Polonius's limited understanding ...
Of course a dance with the Prince of Wales wouldn't have involved a mullet ...
You know, a more honest response would have simply been to acknowledge the friendship, explain how the friend had wandered off down a rabbit hole, wish his family all the best in retrieving him from the rabbit hole, and sternly diss conspiracy theories of the Q kind ... instead of acting all furtive and deceptive, and allowing this sort of cartoon to flourish ...
And so for a little light relief, it's on to the war with China, and who knows, in goodly time, perhaps a third world war, and is there any better guide in all this than the bromancer? The reptiles think so, because look at his position, as top commentary dog, early on a Saturday morn ...
The pond had no choice, the pond was compelled. The pond had wasted too much of its Q ality time, the pond should have helped the bromancer jump the Q, because we must have a gimlet focus on only one country ... and by golly, we need to develop a long-range strike capacity to take out a billion people or so and teach them a jolly good lesson ...
Well the pond has been here before ...
... but is always willing to go there again ...
Passing strange ... elsewhere in the lizard Oz, the hagiographical Shanners was determined to take away a different message ...
But, billy goat butt, it was China, China, Chynah! Oh well, save that for another day, on with the war ...
So that's why we spent an eternity in Afghanistan, and left behind a remarkable legacy, and a defamation trial up there with Q if it weren't for the legal complications involved in commenting on it ...
Uh huh. Back then apparently there was one strategic threat to Australia, just as before that, in relation to Iraq, there had been one clear strategic threat ... but do go on ...
Ah the pond was wondering when the bromancer would get on his tank and armoured vehicles hobbyhorse ... fancy wanting resupply vehicles, when all we need is a gizmo emanating electricity...
Sorry, it's a long read, and the pond always finds war a trifle fatiguing, but on we march ...
Gee, that last par sounds awfully like there's nothing meaningful we can do anyway, but never underestimate the ingenuity of the bromancer. He will find a way ...
The Bart, The ... die maus, die brüllte ...
Sorry, the pond is getting a little light-headed and giddy, but the good news is the solution to hand. Long range missiles, and though the bromancer doesn't dare go there, why not with nukes, so that we can have a genuinely Stanley Kubrick moment?
So there we have it. There's going to be a big do and quite possibly in the next six to ten years, and so we need to be fully prepared to bung it on in the big one ...
After all that, the news that there's only a gobbet of bromancer war-mongering to go produced a sigh of relief in the pond ... this warfare is terribly exhausting, especially when you're a keyboard warrior, pounding away at the keys, with barely the energy to lift that hot chocolate to the lips ...
Indeed, indeed, and yet there's not a single mention of the Jewish space lasers which could well save our bacon.
As a result, the pond was forced to seek safe harbour with the immortal Rowe, with more safety always to hand here ...
Oh maybe that's not a safe harbour after all - the pond once had that precise cigar moment at Maroubra - but at least we'll have the missiles, and until they land, a few scattered memories ...
"... with scribbling friends like these, who needs enemies? "
ReplyDeleteA sort of second-hand Streisand effect, d'you reckon, DP ?
Exactly, although the pond would also settle for the Bennifer effect ...
DeleteThat's one I hadn't cottoned onto - Ben and Jennifer the second time around. That's the trouble nowadays, isn't it: anything you can think of, tens of thousands have already done it ... and done it ... and done it ...
DeleteMaybe Polonius should be referred to the Fixated Persons Unit of NSW Police.
ReplyDeleteI have nearly choked with laughter. A suitable end some might say.
DeleteGrand work Colin.
I'm utterly flubbergusted: the Bromancer is showing some semblance of quasi-rationality over our defence. Yes, the military mugwumps just haven't even begun to take the 21st C on board and they're still after great big useless tanks - which even in the best of circumstances we'll never be able to transport over seas - and even the lovely French subs: "Forget the submarines. They might [might ?] be later than we want and more expensive ..."
ReplyDeleteIt's like he's been reading the Pond and has maybe begin to get what I've been saying. But I suppose that's just arrogant egotism on my part, yes ?
Plagiarism eh?
DeleteSince the Bro is so keen to fight, or have someone else fight on his behalf, I thought I'd have a look at relative orders of battle (navy).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Liberation_Army_Navy
China - 350 surface vessels
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_Royal_Australian_Navy_ships
Australia - 46 warships
Missiles?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidhambling/2021/03/18/china-developing-hypersonic-swarms-to-overwhelm-missile-defenses/?sh=4a605248373a
The Bro seems to be assuming that the major world powers, both up to their eyeballs in nukes, can happily fight a conventional war and we can just toddle along behind our current suzerain to prove our loyalty. It's all based on assumptions about fighting a type of war that's unlikely to eventuate and our only role would be as target practice even if it did.
Maybe my memory is letting me down but I seem to recall a time when the sale of an Australian port or the use of Chinese visa workers was OK. When those in power couldn't spell Uighur or locate Tibet on a map. As long as someone was wetting their beak selling commodities a bit of organ harvesting was neither here nor there.
In fairness, they have always been a bit bipolar about it all.
https://www.crikey.com.au/2015/11/20/confused-about-our-stance-on-foreign-investment-so-is-everyone-else/
The other thing of course is that issues like climate change are so big and our influence is too small to matter so we will just sit here and do nothing, a war however, fark yeah! See ya in the South China Sea!
PS - apparently the landing craft have been upgraded and are unlikely to sink under a main battle tank
"China - 350 surface vessels"
DeleteAnd every one of 'em made with Australian iron, yes ?
"Missiles" ?
Swarms of hypersonic missiles, eh ? Yair, the Chinese have the advantage of not having fought a bunch of wars in the last century or so, and therefore not being infested by a bunch of 'Molans' who just can't stop fighting the same wars they lost in the last half-century or so - Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq etc. Only the one back in 1950-53 which by virtue of much greater manpower, they fought to a draw with the much greater military power of the USA and friends.
Landing craft upgraded ? Oh my, a giant leap forward in military hardware; now all we have to do is to figure out how to get a bunch of upgraded landing craft together with already onboard tanks into shallow waters off the coast of - well, off the coast of wherever our military thinks the next war will be fought - after having gotten our 46 warships past the 350 (and growing) Chinese surface vehicles together with sundry jet fighters, drones with missiles, land-based hypersonic missiles, submarines with Russian torpedoes and seas full of smart naval mines.
Just a doddle, hey.
Just by way of background, does everybody remember the Falklands War (1982 - almost 40 years ago) and what a bunch of now quite primitive French Exocet missiles did to some British warships:
Deletehttps://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/oct/15/revealed-full-story-behind-sinking-of-falklands-warship-hms-sheffield
https://going-postal.com/2021/06/exocet-the-missile-that-almost-cost-britain-the-falklands-war/
Hi Dorothy,
ReplyDeleteWhenever Greg gets himself worked up into a fine old lather (an all too frequent event nowadays) you can be fairly certain someone has been whispering all sorts of doom laden projections into his ear.
I’m guessing this time it’s Ross Babbage (the grand old man of strategic policy, evidently) who has been stoking up the Bromancer.
Babbage has a brief Wikipedia page but it’s the usual old tale of civil servant hawk moving to or indeed creating a national security think tank.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ross_Babbage
His publications list is interesting though. As you can see that by 2015 his ‘thoughts’ were now being published by the Menzies Research Centre and our favourite wing nut vanity publisher - Connor Court.
What a cosy little world these people inhabit.
DiddyWrote
Well somebody must have dragged good ol' Greggy, slouching and moaning, into the 21st century. And even managed to end his passionate romance with a bunch of very long delayed, hyper-expensive, and essentially useless, French submarines.
DeleteI am curious though, as to what might constitute "Australia's Strategic Edge in 2030" his 2011 Kokoda paper. "Strategic edge" against who for what ?