This is what happens when the Caterists set the country on course for a sugar high, then slink off into the night, leaving the pond bereft and heartbroken ...
Someone lets the poodle out, and the poodle, up to his gills on the white stuff, decides to announce, with the fully tone deaf Malware in full cry beside him, that Australia will become a nation of war mongers, and isn't that good ...
Not only were the reptiles mocking it ...others were wondering how joining in a global arms race might improve the prospects for humanity ...
Who else but the poodle could be so gung ho, so tone deaf and so silly?
And that's what happens when the Caterists ship out and leave the pond high and dry.
It has to pay attention to the real world, and the things that delight local cartoonists. The products of war, the death machine, and the services that go with it, the killing fields and repression and havoc.
Oh let loose the poodle of war, alongside the other dogs ...
Naturally Rowe was also on a sugar high, and keen to advertise Australian products and services ...
As always, there's more Rowe here, and in the meantime, the pond began to wander free-form style around the lizard Oz to see what else might catch the eye and serve as a Caterist substitute, Caterist-lite if you will...
The reptiles were naturally agitated about power prices - all this dreadful renewable energy, dinkum Aussie coal oi, oi, oi - and selling modest dress to Islamic countries was also a winner, but being perverse, and reading the Catholic Boys' Daily, naturally the pond was drawn to this story ...
Say what?
It reminded the pond of that old Protestant saw about the church of Rome and the whore of Babylon, as featured in Luther's bible ...
Poor old one-time Protestant David Marr tried to eradicate the idea, thinking it a form of religious bigotry, and yet, when he came to writing up the Royal Commission at length here?
Rome still sees itself as the judge and protector of its priests. Local bishops can’t sack them – they can stand them aside but not sack them. And Rome has never issued an unambiguous directive to priests and members of religious orders who become aware of child abuse in their ranks to call the police.
Coleridge cited lots of talk but no “structured discussions” on the point. Canon lawyers assembled by the chief royal commissioner, Peter McClellan, debated the issue for hours. Leo XIII seemed to say something quite promising but in the end they couldn’t turn up a clear direction from the church to report priestly abusers to the state.
McClellan thought the discussion extraordinary. How can church law be so opaque? “Maybe I’m just an ordinary common lawyer, but we normally say things in simple words.” The canon lawyers balked. McClellan suggested Rome might adopt a plain formula: “Obey civil law.”
What emerged from the evidence of church lawyers, theologians and a slew of bishops about the workings of Rome in Australia was the blueprint of an organisation perfectly suited to eluding control. Coleridge made rather a joke of it: “When I hear people talk about the monolithic Catholic church, I think to myself, which church are we in? It’s like herding cats … ”
...the church is a foreign power. In 2014 it used its status as a little state to deny vital documents to the commission. The refusal was not blanket. Rome’s obstinacy came hedged about with respectful rhetoric. But when it mattered the church said no.
McClellan got the message: “Our experience is that documents generated in Rome in relation to a perpetrating priest won’t be available to civil authorities in the state where the priest lives. That’s what it amounts to.”
Third, the church really doesn’t exist. It’s everywhere but nowhere. It has no more legal form in Australia than a gathering of book clubs. All those dioceses and orders with their immense property holdings are mere unincorporated associations. Among other things: they can’t be sued.
Fourth, no one here can issue orders to every corner of the Australian church. There’s a local bishops conference with considerable authority. But all decisions that really matter are referred to Rome. And bishops have no authority over the orders that run schools and hospitals. Between priests and brothers is a great divide. And the orders have been found to be sheltering appalling numbers of paedophiles.
There's a lot more at the link, but that sets the scene nicely for the paranoia on parade in the Catholic Boys' Daily ...
Strange the good bishop didn't mention all the good work done by the church in the matter of abused children, whereby the local church authorities acted as a chapter for a foreign government pulling the strings from Rome ...
Oh how sweet it was to read, and how wondrous the denials and the insistence on local autonomy ...
International links?
Is that how the Pope is viewed these days? And the local church doesn't act on behalf of the church of Rome?
Why it seems like Catholics down under are now living in a religious crowned Republic ...
Of course Malware's government has made a mess of this legislation, with many unintended consequences, but there's nothing new in that. Just ask anyone hooked up to HFC ...
What was pleasing was the pond being reminded that even when the Caterist cat went away, there would be many other wonders designed to replace the cat and amuse the mice ...
And that brings the pond back full circle to Australia doing a Rambo, and Malware and the poodle drawing a first blood strike from the real Pope, resident in Canberra, with more papal missives here ...
And look, there's some dinkum Oz coal, oi, oi, oi ... won't the reptiles be pleased ...
Hi Dorothy,
ReplyDeleteclerk (n.)
c. 1200, "man ordained in the ministry, a priest, an ecclesiastic," from Old English cleric and Old French clerc "clergyman, priest; scholar, student," both from Church Latin clericus "a priest," noun use of adjective meaning "priestly, belonging to the clerus"
Henry II of England in 1164 attempted to curtail the ecclesiastical privileges and powers of the Catholic Church courts by bringing in the Constitutions of Clarendon.
The Constitutions main purpose were to deal with the issue of “criminous clerks”.
Clergy at that time who had been accused of committing serious secular crimes were not tried by the King’s Courts but by the Ecclesiastical Courts which imposed far less strict punishments. For instance a clergyman convicted of murder would only likely be defrocked. In a royal court the sentence would be more likely one of death.
Henry II had high hopes that the Church would acquiesce to his demands as he had installed his former Chancellor as Archbishop of Canterbury. Unfortunately for Henry, Thomas Becket went native and insisted on the Church’s freedom from the state.
The ensuing argument eventually ended with the murder of Becket in his own cathedral by four of the king’s knights. Becket was immediately raised to the status of martyr and quickly became a saint.
After a year Henry was forced to do penance and walked barefoot to Becket’s shrine at Canterbury in sackcloth and ashes where he was flogged by the monks.
Nearly 900 years later and still the Catholic Church considers itself beyond the reach of state law.
DiddyWrote
Well fair go, DW, the Catholic Church is here in place of God - you know, that thing which made the universe in 7 days. And if you're here in the stead of God, then what "state law" can you be held to ?
ReplyDeleteYou see, when Jesus said "Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's", what he didn't say at the time was that absolutely nothing is Caesar's because everything is God's. Just ask Cardy Pell, he'll happily confirm that.