Wednesday, January 29, 2020

In which nattering "Ned" returns to end the holyday season ...

While on non-reptile matters, the pond would just like to note the sad situation of Gundagai.

The Niagara Cafe, opened 1902, the last remaining continuously owned Greek cafe, a place which staked its claim for offering Ben Chifley a meal, is for sale again, up for auction 14th March 2020 (as can be seen here and here).

The pond used to love to drop in to soak up the atmosphere, which reminded it of a long-gone Tamworth and Gunnedah, where Greek friends had a lock on all the towns' cafes…

The rest of the main drag seems like its up for sale too, and apart from the vandalism of the dog, the dog on the tucker box locale has also fallen on hard times.

Hard times in the bush, which puts into perspective the hard times the pond endures reading the reptiles, and their loonish bouts of insanity, like this outburst by Gra Gra today …


If she allows impeachment proceedings to continue much longer? 

What a goose. Proceedings are now outside Pelosi's control. They're in the Senate, and Moscow Midnight Mitch is the man running the show as best he can to ensure nothing untoward happens …

Meanwhile, the reptile blame again has continued apace. A few days ago it was all Prince Chuck's hypocrisy, yesterday it was the Kiwis with their fush and chups hypocrisy …


Did anyone mention speck, mote, eye and such like?

Meanwhile, the pond has been re-reading Sherlock Holmes and was devastated to discover many "unique" modifiers of the "really unique" kind - at last an explanation for the disease that litters the ABC, especially News 24 - and more potent and shocking than even the absence of the Oxford comma on Boris's cheap celebratory Brexit coin (offered up to the plebs in the grand tradition of panem et coincenses).

Okay, all this has been an elaborate detour to avoid the end of the holyday season. The pond knew that the return of nattering "Ned" would be the sign, and it was thoughtful of the reptiles to make his splash discreet, though no doubt they'll give it a boost during the day …

Look, there it is below SloMo, decisive man of action … or as much as Scotty from marketing can be ...


The pond felt so startled, it immediately called on an infallible Pope for a gong …


Strange, there doesn't seem to be any action behind that third podium …

And so to "Ned", and if there's an unsuspecting newbie in the house, please remember that "Ned" is an interminable bore, incapable of shutting up, scribbling on at tedious length ...


Ah yes, an optimistic path … there's always cause for optimism, and finding treasure amongst the ashes …as the infallible Pope pointed out the other day ...


Okay, the pond has squibbed the return of "Ned". It must do the hard yards, take the ball up the middle, simply endure the text ...


And there in a nutshell is how the lizards of Oz, the Donald, Fox and Friends, Fox News, and the entire Murdochian empire have befuddled and confused, with "Ned" offering the familiar old variant of "unrealistic, irrational and misleading."

Give up prime Angus beef's fiddling with the figures? "unrealistic, irrational and misleading."

Give up a deep love of dinkum clean Oz coal? "unrealistic, irrational and misleading."

Show leadership on the world stage? Suggest the Donald is fucked in the head? "unrealistic, irrational and misleading."

Pretend to be a believer in climate science? "unrealistic, irrational and misleading."

And in a way, "Ned's" right.

Why bother? We know what matters, what will endure ...


And so to more of the pompous bore tediously explaining how it's nothing to do with us, and anything we might do doesn't matter, and don't look here, look over there ...


Yes, there's nothing to see here, more of the same, which is to say less of anything, with a bonus dash of tokenism ...


In short - "Ned" could have said it in a lot fewer words - the planet is fucked, and SloMo and the reptiles don't really give much of a flying fuck …because if they did, it would mean the last decade of coalition policies and reptile scribbles have been a fraud and a sham. And where would it get us, to admit the bleeding obvious?

And that's where "Ned" comes in as he comes back. Dress it up with high-sounding la-di-dah and talk of political imperatives and a lack of policy or political arguments (after all, it's only the bush that is burning), and how simple it all sounds, at least for the simple-minded …

And yet, as the immortal Rowe notes here, hey ho, on we go … with triumph after triumph ...


And so to the bonus of the day, because with nattering "Ned's" return, would it have been right to avoid Dame Slap?


Now there's a typical Dame Slap attempt at purported balance here, but the real game is the punishment of Malware for daring to speak out …


There was plenty more coverage, some of it international, and that deserves payback, and so this is a study in how Dame Slap goes about the business of disciplining naughty students …



While the pond might cry to the heavens for a moment's silence from angry reptiles, relentlessly blathering on, Dame Slap begins a slow descent into her ultimate Malware punch line ...



Julia and George W. as role models? So quickly they forget … even when blessed by a Lobbecke …


What followed in that piece was unendurable, an attempt by Dame Slap at fey whimsy, which is rather like lead doing an impression of a feather, and so we can forget it, and return to Dame Slap's new attempt at a little balance, before we get on with the job of sinking the boot into Malware for daring to mention climate science...


Hmm, that attempt at balance by having a go at the onion muncher reminded the pond of a spanking with a warm lettuce leaf, or Dame Slap mistaking a feather for a cilice … 

Remember, Malware's the game, his scalp the prize (even though he's now long been scalped, and Scotty from marketing might have been copping a Dame Slap dismemberment in his place) … but first a few more tours through politicians behaving badly before we get there ...


Still nothing on reptiles behaving badly, and forgetting what they once wrote? You know, MAGA?



Well speaking of credibility, apparently Dame Slap thinks it gives her credibility to suggest we should all be listening to the likes of Tony Bleagh ...

And so there at the very end, comes the Malware punch line, after a very long and tedious build up.

But, billy goat, butt butt …

The worst former Australian PM in the post-Menzies era? 

Poor old Harold Holt, poor old Billy McMahon … not even mentioned?

Not even the 22 days of Black Jack? The old hatred of Gough forgotten? The downplaying of the knights and dames man, the onion muncher of exceptional futility and pointlessness? The wrecking ball, who's only point was to relentlessly snipe and undermine, and indulge in mindless negativity, even when he himself was in charge of proceedings?

Well the pond has no love of NBN-wrecking Malware, but to what avail this Dame Slap assessment, to what point?

It seems clear enough. Whatever you do, don't step on the ghost of reptile climate science denialism and Scotty from marketing's valiant attempts to maintain the reptile love of coal…


Ah yes, if ever there was a way to become a witch flying on a broomstick to Salem, and a prime subject for Dame Slap's ire  …

And now, in honour of Dame Slap donning the MAGA hat and slipping out into the streets of New York at night - as good a reason as any for hoping for her enduring silence - a few cartoons as another saga plays out ...




9 comments:

  1. ‘Below the surface you sense the desperation from the architects and champions of a global model that isn’t working and was always a third-best solution.’

    Has the Editor-at-Large advanced the contribution to economic thinking from Kelvin Lancaster and Richard Lipsey with ‘The General Theory of Second Best’ published way back in 1956. A reminder, if I may - Kelvin Lancaster was one of Australia’s outstanding, but relatively unknown, economists. Although the Theory of Second Best requires some concentration, it pretty much confounds the ‘leave it to markets to resolve (insert name of current issue)’ dogma.

    Or, as Richard Norgaard put it ‘The argument proved logically irrefutable, but economists discussed its implications for a while, and then ignored it.’

    ‘Wikipedia’ has a delightfully appropriate ‘application’ in its entry on ‘Theory of the second best’.

    Oh - Kelvin Lancaster also published some interesting work on consumer theory, which also confounds much of ‘Marketing 101’. No doubt our PM included that in his wide reading in his undergraduate days, or perhaps before, given his obvious interest in such things. They are both products of Sydney Boys High, but Lancaster’s name does not appear on the ‘short list’ of particular notables.

    Anyway, we look forward to a future paper by Kelly, perhaps co-authored with Honorary Professorial Fellow Sloan, on a theory of third best.

    Other anonymous.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for those pointers, Other Anony. I've never heard - at least to my very best recall - of Kelvin Lancaster. Of John Quiggin, yes; and I think he might be saying some similar things (ref: Libertarians Can’t Save the Planet, https://www.jacobinmag.com/2020/01/libertarianism-climate-change-environment-private-property ).

      Some interesting reading to follow up on.

      Delete
    2. Yes GB - it is the very essence of Quiggin's 'Economics in Two Lessons', which is an easier read than the Lipsey/Lancaster paper. I suspect that Lancaster is not more commemorated by many Australian economists because of what Norgaard said about 'second best' - it is irrefutable; so much of the rah rah from those who write for certain daily publications (hardly mass media any more, given the circulation figures) or who write/spruik for 'industry bodies' should not be filed under 'economics'. Other Anonymous

      Delete
    3. I'll certainly get to the Quiggin, OA, and try to get to the Lancaster as well. Though to be honest, with every passing year in my 9th decade, the level of interest fades away ever faster.

      But no, definitely not "mass media" any longer. Once upon a time a newsagency was a "license to print money". The daily papers made them good money morning and evening for very little effort (I know because I did morning paper rounds - starting at 5:00am - for many years). But now newsagencies are disappearing (along with suburban shopping strip butchers and green grocers as well). Two very large stationery and newspapers/magazines shops have disappeared from the Camberwell shopping precinct in the last year, and now there doesn't seem to be a newsagent in the entire strip.

      So it goes.

      Delete
  2. Ned nattering: "...the steeper scale of adjustment needed in coming years will be so great it "risks seriously damaging the global economy" -- decoded that warns about a global recession".

    Oh I do sincerely wonder what effect a full on climate catastrophe - such as we are ineluctably headed for - would have on The Global Economy" ? Just a teensy-weensy bit of a recession, perhaps ? Over in a week then it's back to the tennis, the cricket and the footy ?

    "...the entire Murdochian empire have befuddled and confused, with "Ned" offering the familiar old variant of "unrealistic, irrational and misleading"."

    Yes, DP, the usual telling of lies which are promiscuously attributed to "the evil left-Greenies" and then using those lies to attack and confound us all. A long-running and very effective ploy - just consult the Murdoch empire for countless examples. Trump also uses it a lot.

    Back to Ned the Nattering again: "national governments -- essentially the big emitters -- refuse to act ..."

    Ok, how about this then:
    The future of coal has already been decided in boardrooms around the globe
    By Ian Verrender
    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-01-28/why-finance-is-fleeing-fossil-fuels/11903928

    And finally, one last lying natter: "Morrison ... won't take further action on climate change if it hurts the economy and means higher power prices. But that is exactly what it means."

    Sure it does, Nattling, sure it does: renewables get cheaper by the day and are now seriously powering industry but "that is exactly what it means". I'd call that appalling ignorance if it wasn't for the fact that it's a gross and deliberate lie. So here we go again; we won't prevent the destruction of the human race if it upsets our economy even a tiny little bit.

    Sayonara.

    As for the other contributor on the day, the less said the better, and the least that can be said is

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Everyone and their dog knows thermal coal is rooted, which is precisely why the miners are paying big time to run this type of tosh. If they had any sort of future they would be sitting back raking in the money, not running endless FUD campaigns to buy some more years (& make some sort of solution ever more improbable).

      The only glimmer of hope is the history of technological change. Legacy industries ignore the risk until the last minute and rarely have any capacity to adapt. Anyone in IT or telecommunications knows this. Try Kodak or Xerox perhaps.

      Bill McKibben explains at length here: https://www.commondreams.org/views/2019/03/16/future-without-fossil-fuels

      The reptiles are natural allies for doomed industries. They don't have any new ideas, only an abiding fear of change. What's Ned suggesting here? Just sit like a rabbit in the headlights? Maybe if we just do nothing the problem will just go away?

      Putting aside the specifics, there is a general problem with the conservative mind. I cannot recall a time when society wasn't going to collapse because of some minor social change or the economy going to collapse if some industrial basket case didn't get support - - - and yet, we seem to live better than our parents and states (and countries) with high renewable energy penetration have cheaper costs and better reliability

      https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/dec/24/south-australias-clean-energy-shift-brings-lowest-power-prices-on-national-grid-audit-finds

      Go figure!

      Delete
    2. A nice death dirge for the thermal coal industry by McKibben, Bef, and he doesn't even mention a major emerging competitor for the gas industry in electrolysed hydrogen (stored and transported as ammonia, extracted via the CSIRO invented membrane). And he doesn't address a still major, and growing, industry in coking (metallurgical) coal. There is a potential competitor in computer optimised high efficiency reflectors that can concentrate sunlight to produce the very high temperatures needed for smelting (aluminium is a snap and even high tensile carbon steel isn't hard).

      But he asks this question: "A far more important question, of course, is whether the changes now underway will happen fast enough to alter our grim climatic future."

      The answer, I'm afraid, is simply no. For an example, consider the rapid melting of the antarctic Thwaites glacier and its impact in the next decade or two on seawater level. And remember that most of the CO2 we've pumped into the atmosphere is there for centuries at a minimum unless we can suddenly produce a massive CO2 extractor (and no, a trillion trees won't work and a coming world human population of at least 10 billion will just make it all way too hard).
      https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-51097309

      Delete
    3. FYI:

      https://www.ssab.com/company/newsroom/media-archive/2019/11/14/10/02/ssab-to-be-first-to-market-with-fossilfree-steel

      A dutch consortium is also doing a trial of ammonia fuel for cargo ships. As far as I can see it doesn't use the CSIRO cracking technology but it is pretty easy to join the dots

      https://www.ammoniaenergy.org/articles/pilot-project-an-ammonia-tanker-fueled-by-its-own-cargo/


      Delete
    4. A couple of interesting posts Bef, thanks. Though I notice that SSAB won't be 'fossil free' until 2045 which is a long time to still be pouring CO2 into the atmosphere that will stay there for centuries or longer. Still, better late than never, I guess.

      The ammonia tanker is also interesting; ammonia isn't particularly flammable, so I'd expect that something is being done to extract the hydrogen to burn so maybe there are alternatives to CSIRO's catalysed membrane.

      But then, there's no mention of the CSIRO in SfM's "hydrogen strategy" that the Libs have been spouting about for a while now:
      https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/morrison-government-heralds-the-hydrogen-revolution-20190228-p510yr.html

      Delete

Comments older than two days are moderated and there will be a delay in publishing them.