Saturday, October 30, 2021

In which the brightest reptile minds sort out the planet at tedious length ...

 

The pond is giving serious thought to a re-branding. 

Initial thoughts that have been kicked around, workshopped and field tested include Metaloon, Lunaverse, and Metalunaverse, though the last one was thought a little unwieldy. 

Not to worry, it's just a way of indicating that the pond is expanding to a place where you can play and connect in 4D. Some loser dropkicks without imagination have limited themselves to 3D, but the pond's 'verse is just like what Robert Lansing did in 4D Man

Of course the energy from virgins will be needed to power the pond's interactive field, but perhaps clean, dinkum, virginal Oz coal will suffice. Rest assured, whatever name the pond arrives at, it will remain a completely virtual world, with a virtually astonishing, ethereal capacity to float through the ether like a weird dose of meta-ectoplasm. 

In short, welcome to the next chapter of social intermetaconnectivity, and lordy lordy, as a side benefit, the pond will have many things to sell you. We might well make Covington House look like a hack second rate brand, and as for the Goopaverse once known as Facetwitch, say no more. 

This will be pioneering stuff, not just your old 2D blogging, and the pond is relying on the reptiles to lift their game, put their shoulder to the clichés, and join the pond in its 4D post meta wurst, and together we can put many more shekels into the chairman's purse.  

Oh okay, Colbert did it much better  in his weird nerd featurette (beware the ads), and what a relief to discover that someone else is an out and proud Facebook refusenik ...

Meanwhile … what a pity it was too late for the reptiles to get this note before they put out today's tosh. 

You see, the reptiles have gone all-in on climate science, and perforce the pond must follow. 

The pond has winnowed out sundry distractions - Dame Slap feeling the woke, the Angelic one feeling the Leunig, prattling Polonius feeling the comrade Dan. These can be tackled on a meditative Sunday.

That leaves the pond to concentrate on the reptiles concentrating on the science, but the result is a stupendous epic, involving the bromancer, the dog botherer, the Bjorn again one, and nattering "Ned"…

Who should go first in this astonishing parade?

Well the bromancer has turned almost as prolix as "Ned", but the pond has always had a soft spot for a man who can spot nuts in a squirrel's paws from a mile away. 

Take it away bromancer ...

 

 

The pond should note from the get go that it's not going to argue with the reptiles. It resolved some time ago that it was better not to argue, better just to observe the reptiles in their natural habitat and see how they are adjusting to the notion of climate science and climate change.

The tortured twists and turns are a wonder to behold and sufficient unto themselves ... as the news team prepare astonishing EXCLUSIVES ...

 


 


 

And the commentariat lather themselves into a frenzy. Lather away, bromancer ...

 


 

Observers will note the particular relish with which the bromancer celebrates the way the United States, West Virginia, and the planet, are comprehensively fucked ...

Please, more relishing, lots of it, and if the bromancer does it long and hard enough, likely we'll completely forget about the land down under and the lizard Oz's sterling climate science denialism over the decades ...


 

There's nothing like dancing on the grave of the planet for undiluted pleasure, and the bromancer perfected these skills long ago, back in the days when he was in a deep romance with the onion "climate science is crap" muncher ...

Keep on with the dancing ...

 

 

 

Indeed, indeed, and the lizard Oz reptiles really have no intention of going to go pure green, preferring to wallow in indolent luxury. 

Set an example to others, avoid killing the planet as a way of backing up the notion that murder is wrong? Certainly not, no need to take a high moral position here, instead just a certain relish at the doom ... because that'll teach the woke, and to show how the reptile game is played, there's nothing like lying that Australia's record is perfectly respectable ...



 

As the bromancer comes to a close,  the pond was reminded, as it frequently is when reading the bromancer, that it's seen this movie before ...

 

 


 

 

One more quick wave of the hat please ...

 



 

Yep, the planet is surely fucked, and so next in the conga line of reptiles dancing in delight comes the dog botherer, because when you want to do something about climate science, always first turn to a climate science denialist ...

 


 

Well it's a strategy. Shape yourself into an inconvenient questioner, rather than a denialist, and then act hurt about being branded a climate denier or when allegedly receiving some other inane slight, as if calling the dog botherer was some sort of slight, not when it's so taxonomically accurate ...

But if we must speak of slights, how about this one ...

...Kenny is a staunchly neo-conservative, anti-progress, anti-worker defender of the status quo. He is an unrelenting apologist for the Liberal Party. He was one of Alexander Downer’s senior advisers at the time of the Iraq War. He’s been known to argue for stubborn, sightless inaction on climate change. He spits at anyone concerned with such trivialities as gender equality, environmental issues or labour rights from his Twitter account on a daily basis. Recently, he characterised criticism of the lack of women in Tony Abbott’s Cabinet as a continuation of the Left’s “gender wars”. He is a regular and fervent participant in The Australian’s numerous ongoing bully campaigns against those who question its editorial practices and ideological biases. The profoundly irresponsible, dishonest, hate-filled anti-multiculturalist Andrew Bolt has recently referred to Kenny on his blog as “a friend”.

Phew, that's some slighting going down, and all the better as it's a flesh and blood slighting ... but softly, because the pond is only here to observe, and of course the dog botherer is totally on top of the complex array of multidisciplinary sciences involved ...


 

At this point, the reptiles decided to insert an image of remarkable banality, as it to evoke the banality of the dog botherer endlessly repeating himself ... in his usual bom-bastic way ...


 

What does the illustration illustrate? For all the complexities, the dog botherer is, under his 'inconvenient questioner' pose, a staunch denialist ... willing to refuse to take the knee just to prove that he's a stubborn, pig-headed, dickhead ...


 

The pond would like to offer some good news, perhaps discuss the coalition modelling used to devise its non-policies, but instead we're just left with the usual conflation of Covid and climate, and blather about wildly inaccurate modelling ...

And that's why the pond must keep pressing ahead, because there's a lot more to come, not least the Everest known as "Ned" ...


 

Indeed, indeed, there's no doubt about it. Fucking the planet will produce great side-effects. At last all those apocalyptic movies will feel like exercises in neo-realism, and think of the whole new generation of disaster porn that Hollywood might be inspired to produce ...

Think of it as evolving Hollywood, to match the varying and evolving climatic, ecological and geographical history of the planet, and at last the pond will be able to grow bananas in Sydney, while frolicking down at the beach just outside Marrickville Metro ...

But all such splendid dreaming with the dog botherer must come to an end at some point, and so to the usual inane ending...


 

Indeed, indeed, and the pond certainly has seen this movie before, only we seem to have advanced a few frames thanks to the dog botherer ...

 

 


 

 

And so to a little taste treat before attempting "Ned's" Everest ... a Bjorn-again technology sorbet ...




The one thing that can be said for the Bjorn again one is that he keeps it short ... and simplistically simple, because he has the simpleton lizard Oz reader in mind, always ready to swallow whatever meaningless statistical flourish the Bjorn-again one flings into the air ...


 

It's around here that the pond gets to play its favourite game. 

You see the pond has a Bjorn-again jar, sitting aside its Godwin's Law swear jar, and the pond shoves in a little cash each time that the Bjorn-again one scribbles a line along the lines of "what is needed is a much stronger focus on green energy research."

The pond is allowed to stuff in more cash if that's followed by an excruciating abuse of English, along the lines of "If the world could innovate green energy ..."

If the pond could innovate a world without the Bjorn-again one, then it would have solved global warming. Everyone would simply switch, because they'd have suddenly understood the benefits of being free of emissions ... Bjorn-again emissions being a prime example of the dangers ...

 


Well the pond didn't expect anything else - in fact all the reptiles have played true to form.

But instead of watching the same old bomb-riding movie before moving on to the "Ned" Everest, how about a break with an infallible Pope?



 

Oh yes, it's a time for rich and splendid ironies ...

 




 

But that's enough of a break, too many Cormann Kit-kats and the tum starts to blow out... and we must be in peak form to climb the Everest known as "Ned" ...

 



By now everyone's eyes must have glazed over, and that shot of Scotty from marketing holding up a report might have passed unnoticed.

But it created an immediate quandary for the pond. Which was the best joke? A reference to another paper clutcher, or a reference to Scotty's own proud history of claw-clutching?

Oh heck, why not both?





 Yes, that works a treat, and what a progression ...

And so back to the trudging ...



Perhaps the pond should toss a few rum-soaked currants into the mix, to help "Ned" go down a little more easily ...

How about this nice little note in Crikey (paywall affected) ...

 



 

Well you're not going to find any PowerPoint slides with "Ned", nor even a mention of his famous podcast, and so onwards we must plod ...




At this point, the pond started to get desperate, and reverted to another rum-soaked Crikey currant ...


 

But enough of comedy, because "Ned" is still droning on, and that infallible Pope feels like an aeon ago ... and even the reptiles knew it was time for a break with yet another click-bait video ...




Thus far the pond has managed to avoid mentioning "Ned's" Chicken Little tendency to hand-wringing and roaming the backyard like a headless chook, but then the reptiles, in a desperate attempt to break up "Ned's" sackcloth and ashes routine, introduced an image which so frightened the pond, it thought about racing upstairs and clambering under the bed ...


 

Eek. What could the pond do to possibly match that terrifying image?

Well it's no match, but Crikey did offer a splendid sighting ...

 


 

 

Yep, the thought of Tucker and Miranda the Devine creaming their jeans over M&Ms surely erases that terrifying SloMo image from mind ...

But that still leaves two gobbets of "Ned" to go ...


 

By this point, it will have become obvious that the pond won't be commenting on "Ned's" many and varied insights, but that's simply because, once having said "what a boring, tedious old fart", what else is there to be said?

There might be a note about the methodology - boring, tedious old fart bores readership into submission or a deep slumber - but even that's taking the analysis a little too deep for what's required ...

You see, at the end of this elongated journey, "Ned" ends up with a classic "Neddism" ...



 

All that to land on the pond's favourite line, one it once included in a documentary: "much has been done, but much remains to be done."

And don't you worry about the planet. It has to be all about meeting our particular economic, energy and political needs, and if that happens to mean fucking the planet, why much has been done, but much remains to be done ...

What a tedious old fart he is, but to end on a high note, it seems that Wilcox has caught the Bjorn-again spirit ...





9 comments:

  1. Cannot let the Boverer go unchallenged - particularly when his header is ‘Fantasy climate policies promise a Utopian outcome’.

    Demonstrating the Mencken maxim that - ‘there is always a well-known solution to every human problem—neat, plausible, and wrong’ (yes, I know there are many versions - but this is from his 1920 ‘Prejudices’) - our Boverer avers that -

    ‘It would be madness, for instance, to suggest climate policies - rather than large, cleared areas - can protect people and houses from the inevitability of bushfires.’

    What is known as the Wangary bushfire, in South Australia, in 2005, killed 9 people and injured another 115 as it raced, at up to 100 kilometres an hour, with temperatures reaching 1 000 °C. The remarkable factor was that that happened across land that is cropped or grazed. Most people would have rated the 780 square kilometres as ‘large cleared areas’ before they were burnt. It was not a fire as most people see on TV news - it was a rolling fire storm, making an explosive mixture from bits of chaff and stubble swept up in the wind front it generated. That fire front was a product of a prolonged period of particularly hot, dry weather; all it needed was a local (‘we know best how to manage the land’) to drive through stubble in the ute with the home-made tailpipe, igniting a fire trail behind him, to get that front rolling.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah Chadwick, I caught that one as well from the botherer. It immediately reminded me of a comment from a CFS volunteer from NSW that was responding to another comment in an article in the Australian. Some one commented that the fires were so serious because of no hazard reduction burns and this CFS bloke responded that his town got obliterated (there was at least one death) but the area around it had been burnt in another fire earlier that year so it was black for as far as the eye could see but still the burnt trees burnt again.

      Delete
    2. Now, now, Chad, you know that reptiles, especially of the Bromancer ilk, are completely impervious to facts and information. The only question is, really, did the idiot local and his exhaust pipe get charged with some form of manslaughter as he should.

      Or was it truly just a man's laughter.

      Delete
    3. GuyM - yes - essentially, how do you do a 'hazard reduction' burn on a barley crop? The last lot of big fires across the country tended to start in grasslands or stubble, but the news footage was of fire in the crowns of trees; much more spectacular. The Royal Commission with the long involved title - but into those fires - did not really grapple with the grassland question. Too many of its recommendations were about 'coordination and communication', and some vague hints about a bit more research, with no real direction to that.

      GB - my recollection is that the idiot local was all confession and contrition a week after the Wangary fire, but then the lawyers set about training him, and he was able to present himself as an unfortunate victim of circumstances. I cannot trace a case through 'austlii' that fits this person.

      The Coroner's finding was quite clear, and the final report included a recommendation that the Government research the likely hazards of non-standard mufflers in rural areas. The farm lobby got onto that one, and the final response was 'Research has now been completed by DTEI and this research does not support a ban or restriction on aftermarket, non-standard mufflers which are appropriately fitted and in good condition.' With strong implication that Government was never going to bother to check that non-standard equipment was appropriately fitted and in good condition.

      Delete
    4. It appears that just about everything is supposed to work by personal and individual responsibility. Until somebody might actually be found personally and individually responsible, and then, well, nobody is actually responsible, it's just "the system".

      Delete
  2. Well, quite a marathon today: Bromancer, Doggy Bov, Bjorn-again and Ned.

    From Bjorny: "Working with 27 of the world's top climate economists and three Nobel Laureates, my think tank, the Copenhagen Consensus, found the most effective long-term climate policy is investing a lot more resources in green R&D."

    Well, who can argue with that: 27 top climate economists, yet: no names, no packdrill, no details of publications or public seminars or anything demeaningly conventional like that, just Bjorn making claims for himself. Oh, and three Nobel Laureates, no less. I wonder who they were because certainly Bjorn isn't going to ever tell us. But the real clincher is that these 30 people found the most effective idea is "investing a lot more resources in green R&D".

    And how was this wonderful "idea" found ? By examining the strategies followed in all the previous climate change situations that mankind has faced and conquered, perhaps ? I mean it's just been one after another ever since we learned how to make fire and started burning off the planet. And what on Earth is a "climate economist" ?

    Ok, so then we get to Nullius Ned: "...at Glasgow, there are stacks of ludicrous hypocrisies that Morrison could highlight." Yes, SloMo could wave a lump of coal around just to show how incredibly sincere he is.

    Then: "Let's hope he reminds Biden that Donald Trump gave notice to withdraw America from the Paris Accords." Yes, and so ? "The US has scant moral capital on climate change." Oh, right. So anything done in the past by a previous incumbent is to be held against the current president ? Does this hold for PMs ? Is Morrison culpable for everything done by a previous PM ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi GB,

      I found this “expert panel” for Bjorn’s CCC from back in 2004.

      https://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/copenhagen-consensus-2004/expert-panel

      All are economists, all are old in fact most are now dead, none appear to have any experience in Climate Science or anything interrelated. Most however appear to be closely related to the Chicago School of Economics, so that’s Milton Friedman and the joys of “Free market Economics” that has benefited us all so much.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_school_of_economics

      As for Lomborg’s Cost-Benefit Analysis as a methodology to ascertain good outcomes from Climate Change there is a thorough debunking here;

      https://medium.com/@SinaKK/everything-wrong-with-bjorn-lomborg-and-the-australian-consensus-centre-edc75f04f010

      DW

      Delete
    2. Thanks, DW. Looking at your first link is entertaining. Lomborg's claim about "27 of the world's top climate economists" is simply ludicrous. His 'copenhagenconsensus' site shows nothing of the kind, of course, just 8 economists on his "expert panel" of which the only name I recognised was Schelling.

      But then if you select 'Experts' up at the top, there's screen after screen after screen of 'Experts' which Lomborg claims "have worked with the Copenhagen Consensus Center" which is very doubtful. He even claims the 'Save the Children' NGO as one of the "experts". Oh yes. Can't say I actually read the whole list (there's lots of them), but again the only name I recognised was Thomas Schelling.
      https://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/expert

      As to Lomborg's little book of anti-science fantasy the Denmark Ministry of Science says it all; it contains:
      Fabrication of data
      Selective discarding of unwanted results (selective citation)
      Deliberately misleading use of statistical methods
      Distorted interpretation of conclusions
      Plagiarism
      Deliberate misinterpretation of others’ results.

      Yep, that would appeal to the reptiles, it's so very much like them.

      Delete
  3. So, the Doggy Bov would once again like to harangue us about the evil 'greenies' who think we should do something about global warming. He warns us that:
    "We must not question this because the alternative is face even higher costs and/or destroy the planet."

    The "higher costs" being the costs of doing nothing and letting global warming/accelerated climate change "destroy the planet." And about that, Doggy B likes to say: "The only justification provided, without any factual basis or numerical explanation, is that the cost of doing nothing would be higher."

    So, just because Doggy Bov hasn't found any "factual basis or numerical explanation" means that there isn't any. But then, the research capabilities of the reptiles are exceedingly poor, especially in the case of DB. Even a very cursory search found Jonathan Watts Graudian article:

    Prof Peter Stott: ‘Denialists question the cost of climate action … doing nothing costs far more’
    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/oct/30/prof-peter-stott-denialists-cost-climate-action-net-zero-cop26

    In this Prof Stott claims that: "There is a whole raft of research and evidence that the costs of doing nothing are far greater." and he points to this article:
    Climate crisis to shrink G7 economies twice as much as Covid-19, says research
    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/jun/07/climate-crisis-to-shrink-g7-economies-twice-as-much-as-covid-19-says-research

    So there we go, maybe there is some "factual basis or numerical explanation" after all. Hu cooda node. From my own point of view, most of the "costs" assessed are monetary. I guess because it's difficult to tell how many 'premature' human and animal deaths will occur, possibly whole species (animal and vegetable) going extinct etc. And just the extreme cost of 'learning to live with it' in terms of major cities reaching temperatures of 50C and higher during much of the year. I reckon the cost of such things will be enormous - especially if we continue to use coal-fired electricity generation to run our air conditioners.

    ReplyDelete

Comments older than two days are moderated and there will be a delay in publishing them.