Sunday, September 19, 2021

In which the pond ruins its Sunday meditation with the dog botherer, takes public health lessons from a French and Spanish speaker, and demotes Polonius's obsession with the ABC to a bonus offering ...

 

 

As advised yesterday, "Ned's" words would come in handy for a meditative Sunday ...

 

 

The pond freely admits that starting a Sunday meditation with the dog botherer is beyond the valley of the unkind ...

It's roughly equivalent to having the bromancer's words about living in the 1930s echo in the pond's mind and recall Pigiron Bob's biggest strategic mistake ...so just when will the bromancer begin demanding that all iron ore exports to China cease, for fear that they be shipped back to us in the impending third world war?

Never mind, here we are, exporting iron ore for the Chinese to make many more subs than Australia will produce in an eternity of alliances, and the dog botherer seizing the chance to defy "Ned" and take the country full nuke ...

 


 

 

At the heart of the dog botherer's case for nuking the country lies a profound hypocrisy and cynicism ... some might call it disingenuous, but it's really more shameless, duplicitous, fraudulent humbug ...

More of that anon, let's get into the nuking, and with a bit of luck a half life of 250,000 years ... but then eventually the sun will devour the earth, so what does it matter? And in shorter half lives, the pond will be long gone before the first nuke sub lands in country ...

 


 

Sheesh, another tedious illustration from the useless reptile graphics department ... surely we need the odd surreal moment when dealing with the surreal dog botherer?

 




 

Ah that's better, and Rowson is easy to find here ... now back to nuking the country ...



 

 

Here's the thing. To date all the significant actions, or more precisely the fuck-ups in relation to subs (never mind recent military follies), have been undertaken by coalition governments. 

Yet suddenly we're to believe the 'Utegate/fuck Iraq with Lord Downer' man and think that everything is suddenly going to get better?

As if aware this might be a dubious proposition, the useless graphics department flung in another useless illustration as a distraction ...



 

 

Well, that did nothing to help the pond with enlightenment. Back to the Utegate man explaining good policy ...

 


 

And there's where the rank dissembling and the rank hypocrisy enters the stage from loon right. 

Why does the dog botherer care about net-zero emissions? The dog botherer doesn't accept the science, the dog botherer is a climate science denialist. 

The dog botherer isn't committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions to net zero ... the dog botherer doesn't see the point of it ...

Oh sure, he's purported to come to terms with the human role in global warming but that's just a stage in his denialist journey ... a little window dressing, a little sheep's clothing for the road ... for a journey which included this new year's eve rant in 2008 for the 'Tiser, reproduced here ...

 



 

The dog botherer has been rabbiting on about climate alarmism for decades, so why the desire to nuke the country when he has no interest in solar or wind or batteries or other solutions that exclude finding ways to try to avoid contaminating the country for thousands of years?

In the end, it's just another way of owning the climate alarmists ... or owning the libs or the greenies if you will ... or owning the Graudian ... because the dog botherer has never been for turning ...
 

 


 

Emissions free? So much for nuclear waste. And what of "Ned's" pious natter about not nuking the country after yet another dose of the dog botherer? 

Will "Ned" suddenly realise he's in a company assiduously running the line loved by the populist coalition right fringe?

Probably not ... "Ned" is in his own way as much a fringe dweller as the dog botherer.

And speaking of fringe dwellers, this weekend the lizard Oz turned up a beauty, a real ripper ...

 





 

Whenever the pond wants public or personal health advice, it naturally turns to the lizard Oz's commercial editor. He's studied Spanish and French at Oxford university, essential prerequisites for sounding authoritative on matters of public and personal health ... so here we go, here we go ...


 

There are explicit laws? What, like the one in Victoria?



 

Sure the other states are a little more lax, here, but is it only French and Spanish teachers that are allowed to make broad, sweeping and silly statements? Can't the pond do it in mangled French?

Here, have a Daily Beast moment ...

 

 


 

Now get out the twanging guitars and banjos as the French and Spanish speaker explains why the pond should keep the company of loons in public spaces ...

 


Actually the pond is terrified of coming into contact with a loon who thinks that it's their god-given right to wander around without taking sensible precautions. If the French and Spanish speaker came within eyeshot the pond would run a mile ... (actually the pond would have run at least a mile in pre-pandemic times because this loon has an ancient mariner glitter to the eye and the rant) ...

It turns out that the loon is apparently unaware of break through infections though if he were to get his nose out of his French and Spanish dictionaries, the information wouldn't be hard to find ...

 



 

Never mind, on with the rant ...


 

We're really not that far from Tucker Carlson here, but what really gets the pond's goat, billy goat butt, is the notion that those loons who refuse to take sensible precautions should be rewarded for their risky behaviour and load up the medical system and health carers as they see fit ...



 

The pond supposes that it deserves all this for turning to look for public and personal health advice from a commercial editor at the lizard Oz ... that the pond's stupidity might not be immediately apparent to everyone must remain a profound mystery, but to be fair there are even more monstrously stupid people at the lizard Oz in the grip of institutional stupidity which somehow deemed that the thoughts of a French and Spanish speaker might be of some use ...



 

Indeed, indeed, the pond accepts without hesitation that Steve Waterson is an idiot. The pond would only like to suggest that this doesn't quite sum up the level of idiocy. "Steve Waterson is a fuck-witted idiot" seems to better encompass the situation,  in the grip of hysteria, or utter insanity, and is palpably absurd, and thank the long absent lord, he can't do anything about public health policies, but must be content to jump up and down on the spot and shout at the moon ...

And so to the bonus, and it's a sorry world where prattling Polonius is reduced to a bonus, but dear sweet long absent lord, his obsession with the ABC is wearying and tiresome ... and it seems to be getting worse, week by week ...



Only Polonius could take the side of Xian Porter in the latest twist of the saga. Even Scotty from marketing has ducked for cover ...



 

But still Polonius ploughs on, and as usual, it's all the fault of the ABC that Xian Porter decided on a blind trust solution, thereby embarking on a blind folly ...



And so to the justification of the indefensible, a Polonius speciality ...




Pure, undiluted hysteria, of a classic Polonial kind ... and the pond had to turn to First Dog for a hint of sanity ... which is rich when you think about it ...

 




17 comments:

  1. Viva la difference! One of the dog botherer's flying monkeys has been reading the pond:

    MaxPower
    1 HOUR AGO
    Dear Chris, there seems to be a divergence of opinion between you and Paul Kelly on whether the submarines deal opens the way to civil nuclear power. Good to see some diversity of opinion. Some time this week could we have a joint column giving us your reconciliation of the two views?

    Can't wait! Maybe they could do it as a podcast?

    ReplyDelete
  2. The killer excels himself. https://twitter.com/Adam_Creighton/status/1438888420856811520

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous - I double-checked, because 'Miranda Divine' is much more entertaining, and believable, than 'Miranda Devine' - but this really does seem to be the genuine A-dam Creighton. Not 'Betoota Advocate', nor 'Chaser' - just amazing stuff, that, with all due regard to our steady satirists, would be difficult to make up.

      Delete
    2. ... and thus the borders between rationality/truth and conspiracy/lies blur...

      Delete
    3. Another one of those ratioed tweets. Pretty much a "Jackass" approach to journalism, doing whatever it takes to get attention even if you suffer badly as a result.

      Delete
    4. One of the principles of economics is that money circulation is a good thing, as Keynes put it:
      "If the Treasury were to fill old bottles with banknotes, bury them at suitable depths in disused coalmines which are then filled up to the surface with town rubbish, and leave it to private enterprise on well-tried principles of laissez-faire to dig the notes up again (the right to do so being obtained, of course, by tendering for leases of the note-bearing territory), there need be no more unemployment and, with the help of the repercussions, the real income of the community, and its capital wealth also, would probably become a good deal greater than it actually is. It would, indeed, be more sensible to build houses and the like; but if there are political and practical difficulties in the way of this, the above would be better than nothing."

      Book 3, Chapter 10, Section 6 pg.129 "The General Theory.."

      Delete
  3. On the AUSUK (sic) pact ...
    When I hear the combination "nuclear" and "France" two words spring to mind; :"Rainbow" and "Warrior".
    Perhaps the pond can find a reminder of this long-outstanding account.
    Even Saudi Arabia did not honour its murderers.
    This was our vessel. We do not forget.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sure I heard That Fella from Marketing say 'nucular'. In best dubya tradition!

      Delete
  4. Remember this? "Thousands of people last week discovered that Amazon had quietly removed electronic copies of George Orwell's 1984 from their Kindle e-book readers." There will be a similar technology built into our nuclear submarines, in case we don't bey orders from The President, or in case someone starts undoing the bolt next to the sign "Unscrewing this bolt will void your warranty".
    Actually such technology must be built into present US submarines, in case there is a Captain Ripper out there, concerned about his precious bodily fluids.

    ReplyDelete
  5. And we all know that poor Porter is so broke, comes from a generational line of utter poverty, so broke he has no pants to have the arse out of.
    So good of Polonius to go to battle on behalf of the Nation's poorest politician.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I dunno soth, he has two failed marriages, significant ongoing entertainment expenses, it would appear (which he can only partially expect the taxpayer to foot) and now a large legal bill. Sure, he's not poor like you or me, but in his universe, he's doing it tough. And in his universe, those doing it tough get help from their mates.

      Delete
    2. Ah well since you put it that way, Merc, it's quite clear that Porter deserves all the help he's given. Though I do agree with DP in thinking that cancelling his court case just to escape some of the evidence from emerging into the light of day, is just a tad sus.

      Delete
  6. Hi Dorothy,

    Am I missing something?

    One of the pictures illustrating the Dog Botherer’s piece is titled “Engineers stand next to the world’s most powerful magnet as it is delivered at the international nuclear fusion project Iter in Saint-Paul-les-Durance, southern France, on September 9”.

    Kenny’s entire piece is about nuclear subs and nuclear reactors both of which are powered by nuclear fission not fusion.

    DiddyWrote

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Umm, "have you ruled out stupidity",DW ? Besides, he's really just trying to show that he is definitely one of Steve Waterson's 12 million Australians who "are, by definition, of below average intelligence."

      Of course Waterson means IQ score rather than "intelligence", but I wouldn't expect him to know who either Alfred Binet or Lewis Terman were.

      Delete
    2. "Stupid" is such a universal answer to all questions Loon that it tends to stifle discussion.

      "I'd bet everyone reading this newspaper would comfortably be in the top ten percent". After I cleaned up the coffee I started to wonder how anyone could maintain this level of delusion?

      As usual, no arguments are made, only the assertion that those that disagree must be of low intelligence - you know, public health professionals, academics and so on, all of low intelligence judged by Waterson's chosen test.

      Anyway, those of us who fail these tests of someone else's making are obviously predestined to our fate

      https://indignity.substack.com/p/indignity-vol-1-no-20-the-nice-kind

      Delete
    3. Indignity substack - hmm. Unknown to me until today, so thanks for this, Bef.

      "Evolutionary psychologists" as phrenologists - I just hadn't made that connection until now. However, as to stupidity, the question is whether it's a state or a behaviour. Personally I go for it being very partially a state but mostly a behaviour. In other words it's more dependent on learning and conditioning than on some or other minor genetic pattern. Genetic patterns may indeed determine whether or not you retain a high level of melanin in your skin, but they do not directly determine your 'IQ'

      At least not as initially defined by the IQ originator, Alfred Binet who defined the 'quotient' - which as we all know is the result of dividing one number by another - as the ratio of 'mental age' to 'chronological age' multiplied by 100. So, as we grow older, unless our mental acuity keeps significantly increasing, our IQ significantly decreases.

      Or in short, Binet's 'test' was all about him - as a school inspector - determining how the kids were going, who was ok, who was ahead and who needed help - expecting a few above 100, a few below 100 and most on or near 100. Then that dickhead Lewis Terman wanted to turn it into some kind of inherent and inescapable attribute of human minds. So we lost a useful educational tool and gained a useless 'measure' of human cognitive 'ability'.

      And we copped a never-ending stream of people like Kathryn Paige Harden committing their repetitive acts of 'stupidity'.

      Delete
  7. This one’s for those deluded Alabama Pickers - sung to the tune of Dixie of course.

    They would not vax in Dixie
    “No way!” they’d say
    In Alabam’ they took a stand
    But Covid made ‘em sickly

    Then they were laid
    Away down south in Dixie
    With funeral costs
    All paid for by GoFundMe

    ReplyDelete

Comments older than two days are moderated and there will be a delay in publishing them.