In which the reptiles lose their mojo and the pond has to turn to other entertainments ...
Sad to say, the reptiles at the lizard Oz have lost their mojo today, and the pond doesn't know where to find it ...
The Woolworths affair seemed best taken care of with a couple of cartoons...
There was simplistic Simon in the far right perch touting Captain Spud's team, just the usual day out for the propaganda sheet, and down below there was Dame Slap earning an automatic red card, while petulant Peta was wandering down mammary lane ...
Given the fierce reaction she provokes in pond correspondents, the pond always hesitates to go there, but decided to do a sample ...
That was more than enough, yet another tiresome celebration of an epic failure, the worst PM in living mammary, though perhaps the best onion muncher ...
The pond had to fight hard to resist the temptation to do a Meghan ...
It says a lot about the pond's mood that Meghan should be the go.
Down below there were even more feeble offerings ...
The ponrd red carded Mikko and the apparently corporeal Korporall attempting to blame the Woollies affair on being woke was simply too bizarre, given (a) the interview and (b) questions of price gouging.
The sudden announcement of the departure of Woolworths chief executive Brad Banducci has thrown a spotlight on the dangers of chief executives becoming involved in social issues. While Banducci argued that the timing of his announcement on Wednesday had long been planned and had nothing to do with his disastrous interview this week on Four Corners, or his recent involvement in the controversy over not stocking Australia Day-themed goods, the timing of his announcement means he is exiting bruised by recent events. While businesses have learned not to align themselves with any political party, given the real possibility of governments changing, high-profile business leaders have seen fit in recent years to become commentators on social issues of the day. Issues such as same-sex marriage, the Indigenous voice to parliament, the merits of celebrating Australia Day and the war in the Middle East have become areas drawing in some business leaders. But the pendulum may be swinging the other way, with the risks outweighing the perceived social halo – despite the prevailing corporate speak for having “purpose-led” organisations.
Australia Day!?
Dear sweet long absent lord, that's not what the pond notices when it attends a supermarket and endures the latest bout of price gouging.
The pond understands the purpose-led point of News Corp. It's fear, loathing and angertainment, whatever their faux mission statement:
News Corp is a company truly greater than the sum of its parts. Driven by passion, guided by principles and acting with purpose, we are dedicated to delivering value to our customers and our shareholders with premium products and services that inform and inspire.
Clearly Glenda never bothered, and why would you, being paid to hack out the usual Oz day crap, but why is it that the cartoonists always ask the relevant question and never the reptiles?
Glenda, Glenda, look at the detail, that's no woke chook, that's a chook making off with the price-gouged golden egg ...
The pond had doctors warning the pond off red meat and the plonk way back when ...
Anyhoo, long story short, that's how the pond ended up with Jack this day ... but it should probably note the rest of Charlie's joke first ...
And so to Jack, picking the easy target of the week ...
Of course it's easy pickings, especially as Tuckyo can be presented as a wild-eyed wonder and not a Faux Noise creation, while the Putin-lovers in the GOP, not least the mango Mussolini himself, can be carefully stepped around, unless you happen to read Cathy Young in The Bulwark, J. D. Vance (R-Moscow) ...
And so on, there's a lot more, but the pond has saddled itself with Jack, who in his quest for the easy target even invokes Hogan, which says much more about the reptile demographic than it does about Russia and the quislings in the US ...
Naturally that gave the remnants of the lizard Oz graphics department a chance to do a Peta and dance with the ghosts of the past, as well as offering up a few other free pics...
Behold, the current must-have accessory for all the most grimly murderous dictators – a pet American idiot. Not just any American idiot, obviously. You need a male, mid-50s to early-60s, ideally fire-damaged by a recent career setback, who just wants to see the best in you for coins. In short, you need someone of the … calibre, would you call it? … of Tucker Carlson or Johnny Depp.
The past week or two has seen the formal reveal of two of these new dictator-pet acquisitions: Vladimir Putin’s kind offer to rehome the stray former Fox News host, and Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman’s generous response to the question How Much Is That Deppy in the Window? Answer: a rumoured seven-figure tourism promo deal and forking out for one somewhat indifferent period French film. I know. Pets are very reasonably priced, not to say embarrassingly cheap.
So let’s start with Johnny Depp, the joint subject of a most eye-catching Vanity Fair article headlined “Inside Johnny Depp’s epic bromance with Saudi Crown Prince MBS”. Yes, yes – please take us inside it. Although we reserve the right to leave at any time without being dismembered. The safe-word is Raytheon.
According to the article, Depp first came into contact with the Saudi ruler while working on a precariously financed French film, last year’s Jeanne du Barry. Having secured Saudi funding, the movie’s producers required their star to meet MBS’s cousin – a guy called Prince Badr – who also serves as some kind of cultural bagman. I’m getting huge Ribbentrop energy, but perhaps he’s adorable. Anyway, one thing led to another, and within months Depp was revelling in all-expenses-paid trips and face-to-face time with MBS, listening to his excuses about the murder of Jamal Khashoggi, and making “a genuine connection”. Hey – the heart wants what it wants. Likewise the wallet. According to Vanity Fair, “both men knew how it felt to suddenly go from golden boy to outcast”. And certainly the fates can be very cruel.
As can movie financing. Seriously, why spend years waiting for your producer to patchwork together some shaky funding from the French film foundation, plus a lottery grant, plus an endowment from the Trudi Styler Cinema in Peril fund, plus fifty quid from Unesco, plus some crappy Belgian tax credits? You have something really important to get made, in which you get to crossly overturn a small occasional table in Versailles – all while wearing a feathered tricorn hat. How DARE “the market” deny the culture this future gem? How dare people think your god-given right to pretend to be someone else for money should depend on such shifting sands? Why not just go to Daddy Bonesaw and get his chump change in five seconds? And listen, MBS’s “Red Sea Film Fund” wants nothing more than to finance a film about a French courtesan. Given that the finished movie contravenes about 437 of his country’s decency and modesty laws, I guess something about Du Barry’s life just spoke to MBS. Maybe the fact a woman gets her head cut off.
For his part, Depp responded to Vanity Fair’s request for comment on his new alliance with a lengthy statement claiming to have “experienced first-hand the cultural revolution that is happening” in Saudi, “from emerging young storytellers radiating fresh ideas and works of art to a blossoming film infrastructure and a newfound curiosity for innovation”. Attaboy.
In terms of the old quid pro quo, do remember that Depp has in recent years been saddled with what euphemism forces us to style “expensive legal setbacks”, followed by “expensive legal victories”. He reportedly has an endless array of luxury properties to maintain, including a French village he was trying to sell, and a private Caribbean island. A private island – of course. Has anything good ever come of a white man owning a private Caribbean island? (Don’t write in, Branson, even though I’m using your letters to make a papier-mache sculpture of you carrying a woman in the course of a promotional stunt. I call it “The Ally”.)
Now that's how to do a put down, and Jack isn't in the same league, let alone playing the right game in the ballpark ...
Everybody knows he was bumped off, just like the refugee chopper pilot in Spain ... and lots of other splendid abuse of Tuckyo had already been delivered in fine style ...
...But let’s move on to Tucker Carlson, who recently went all the way to Moscow to interview the Russian president in hardcore lapdoggy style. There is a grim sort of poetic justice to the fact this televised fawnathon took place just days before Putin’s likely murder of Alexei Navalny, which itself seems to have occurred around the time Tucker was filming imbecilically approving videos in a Russian supermarket. Did you see the one where he seems to think he has discovered a cutting-edge Russian invention in the form of supermarket trolleys you need to release with a coin? I love that it reveals how much Tucker’s producer hates him, willingly allowing his super-rich boss to stray into elite self-parody by lauding something freely available to US citizens in Aldis and airports for quite, quite some time now.
In related news, then, a word on pet cruelty. At this stage, Depp has yet to feel the sharp end of an emerging young storyteller radiating fresh ideas. But Tucker’s claim to have been in Moscow doing hard journalism was excruciatingly factchecked by Putin himself, who, shortly after the interview aired, appeared on TV with a smirk to lament the fact Tucker didn’t ask any “tough questions”. How mean. A Tucker should be for life, not just for propaganda Christmas.
Finally, a bizarrely blame-free social media post about Navalny by Donald Trump suggests the Russian president still has old dogs who pee on the rug/Moscow hotel mattress. In fact, speaking of going to the mattresses, the prospect of that particular dictator-hound throwing down for Putin is more grotesque by the day, and the very strongest of arguments for a no-pets rule in the White House.
And that of course is where Jack can't go, he can't dwell on the GOP, or the tangerine tyrant sucking up to Vlad, and the role of Faux Noise and the Emeritus Chairman's mob in giving Vlad the sociopathic impaler a free pass, while still doing their best to get a malevolent mango dictator elected ...
Ultimately, Navalny's death is a reminder of the lick spittle fellow travellers abroad in the GOP and Faux Noise, but Jack isn't up for the reminding, ending with a whimper, not a bang ...
To be sure, he's the child of Faux Noise ... confronted with an actual mango Mussolini, they smile and urge a vote for the fraud ...
Finally a note on what happens with the bro isn't around. The reptiles stick in somebody else to scribble about defence ...
The promises are positive? What planet has this creature come from to dwell among the reptiles? Once again the pond is left yearning for the bro and a serve of paranoid hysteria and war with China by Xmas ...
The pond is so used to bromancer hysteria that this was hard to take, and the conventional snap that was offered was no relief either ...
There was something so earnest about the piece that the pond felt the bromancer loss in every gobbet...
The pond realised why it had begun the mission in the first place. There was a cartoon to hand ...
And then there was a final gobbet of staid analysis, shocking to anyone fed a bromancer diet ...
Well, the pond can't stop there, unpersonned ghost ships ahoy, there was yet another reminder of how dull Jack was this day, and it came in the form of Jon Stewart.
Stewart's return to the fray had been a rocky one, terrified by those who fear a mention of jolly Joe's age will see the mango Mussolini return to power and begin a dictatorship.
It's a reasonable fear, but Stewart was saved by Carlson's folly ...
And as we're walking down memory lane this day, here the pair were, way back when ... naturally after this performance the grinning goon with the bow-tie was destined to join Faux Noise ...
Petty Peta: "Illegal migration is a scourge few countries seem able or willing to solve." Yeah, right on. But why is nobody mentioning the illegal immigrant landing near Daintree back in Spud's time ? Asylum seekers from 'people smuggling' boat held as Peter Dutton blames surveillance failure https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-08-27/daintree-suspected-illegal-fishing-boat-two-arrested/10167836
"Mr Dutton said the boat's arrival was the result of a surveillance failure." Oh yes, of course it was. Right along with all those who just fly in as "tourists".
"But the real border control issue today is the record number of asylum seekers, mostly non-genuine, entering as tourists right under Dutton’s nose. He has serious questions to answer on this." https://www.smh.com.au/national/worst-ever-immigration-minister-asylum-seekers-jet-in-under-dutton-s-nose-20190302-p511d8.html
Forget anything that occurred post-Onion Muncher, GB; Peta certainly has. Based on the featured extract her piece is an exercise in pure nostalgia for 2013-15, when her world was young and she ruled the PMO and pulled the Prime Ministerial strings. She yearns for those days to come again but they never will, leaving her only the spite and bile that is her stock in trade.
If I don't ever mention it again then it never really happened, Anony ? But ignoring Peta, I'm just curious that nobody else seems to be mentioning it.
Oh, but here's somebody who does mention it, along with several other aspects of Spud Dutton's career:
Paul Bongiorno: Peter Dutton’s border security offensive takes on water https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/opinion/2024/02/20/paul-bongiorno-peter-dutton-border-security
Alan Kohler: The problem with Australian politics? Both sides agree about everything https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/opinion/2024/02/22/kohler-politics-bipartisanship
Poor old Corporal Korporaal; one of the less-visible Reptiles, slogging away in the ranks for donkey’s years while never really being mentioned in dispatches. Her problem may that as a business writer, she’s served in an area where journalism tends to be fairly restrained, sober and reasonably fact-based; conservative, but with the occasional exception such as Mein Gott it doesn’t produce too many raving crackpots. Perhaps her embrace of the “woke Woolies”campaign is a final attempt by her to rise from the ranks and become a true Culture Warrior ? Alas, I fear that reinforcements have arrived too late; that battle is over and already largely forgotten. Play “The Last Post” please, bugler.
I did wonder about him, GB, but decided that as he considers himself an “economist” (though others may question that) he falls into a field well known for journalistic whackos.
Apropos of NewsCorp's mission statement. Apologies to Tears For Fears.
Fool The World
Welcome to Oz life Never mind the facts We'll put you to sleep You'll be fine we'll Just reprogram your behaviour To believe that Trump's your saviour All we need to do is fool the world
You will be rewired You'll have no remorse You'll believe the lie That the wokes have Trashed our freedoms and our pleasures Smashed our heritage forever All we need to do is fool the world...
The reptile cousins across the water have been expressing shock and amazement that a survey of US presidents has placed Trump last of the 45. This immediately triggered the loyalty of ‘presenters’ here on Sky, so last night Blot confected laughter about the survey, with rhetorical ‘Who are these people’ and, the clincher ‘I have never heard of them’.
It was easy enough to find out who those people were - because one Fox character, in talking over the others on their ‘panel’, identified enough for this h’mble to find the -
Results of the 2024 Presidential Greatness Project Expert Survey
which tells us that the survey was conducted by Qualtrics - a firm whose findings usually are accepted without question when they dip into the databases of Australian ‘market research’ providers, and come up with ‘exclusive’ findings for IPA, or the reptiles, claiming to confirm the reptile brain snap of the week, by calling up a minutely specified demographic.
In this case, respondents were sought from the American Political Science Association, and scholars who have recently published peer-reviewed research on presidential politics with recognised academic presses.
After an overall result, the paper offers tables drawing on the declared political ideologies of the 154 respondents. Even at that, avowed Republicans (as of November/December 2023) were not prepared to lift Trump much above ranking in the lowest 5.
Anyway, there are 12 pages of analyses that even the average ‘presenter’ might have worked up into a good story, using names of presidents that some ‘Sky’ viewers might have recognised, but I guess it was all a bit tiring for the Blot to read a whole 12 pages of print.
Memo to Blot - if you have never heard of the participants, you can be even more confident they have never heard of you. It is unlikely that your ‘publications’ are cited by any of the members of APSA, even as salutary examples of misinformation.
Kez says "All we need to do is fool the world" We are the fools. We qre sleepwalking toward autonomous weapons. And war. We just need the drone operators to slip - once. RoboWar.
How did the reptiles miss this, from 12 February: Naarea and Thorizon team up on molten salt reactors "the two companies have decided to join forces to accelerate the development of MSRs in Europe." ? They are not a NEWSpaper, so why did you think that they would cover it? (Oh, and if you guessed that "It expects the first units of XSMR to be produced by 2030" go to the top of the class.)
Ok, so if the first MSRs (note: NOT "modular", just molten salt), then how long before they shake off the 'first release" problems and faults and become genuinely commercially available ? Mid 2030s at a minimum ? And what cost and how long to build ? Several US$1bn per reactor and minimum of 5years to build ?
I know nothing about the technology, but the cynic (realist?) in me says that if the advocates claim that the tech will be up and running by 2039, we’re looking at circa 2050 - if ever. I’d certainly expect a lot of “just around the corner” updates.
Skynyet consults Wiki about (in)capability gaps in (un)manned clean-up(s) on Aisle 8: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Crossroads#Test_Charlie https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Wigwam#Detonations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Status-6_Oceanic_Multipurpose_System#Reactions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salted_bomb#In_popular_culture
"The purpose of the tests [Operation Crossroads] was to investigate the effect of nuclear weapons on warships." Oh yes, something that the human race, or at least the American component of it, just really had to know.
Reminds me of a cinema newsreel I say way back in the 1960s sometime about how the Australian Army constructed a tower in the northern jungle somewhere and fixed it up with 10,000 tons (IIRC) of TNT to simulate a nuclear bomb, because "One of the questions that must be answered in a nuclear age is: what is the effect of a nuclear bomb on a tropical rainforest." Some poor sod of a sargeant had to climb up the tower to arm the explosives then scamper down again before it went off. He was awarded a medal for bravery for that.
Meanwhile, down there in Alabamy - the law puts science in its place.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68366337
Briefly - some frozen embryos in a fertility clinic in Alabama were destroyed because of an accident in storage. The couples who had provided the eggs and sperm tried to sue the clinic under the state's Wrongful Death of a Minor Act. That law covers foetuses, but did not specifically cover embryos resulting from IVF.
The case went through a couple of judicial levels, to the Alabama Supreme Court, which sided with the couples, and ruled that frozen embryos were considered "children".
The wrongful death law applied to "all unborn children, regardless of their location", the decision said.
Concurring with the majority opinion, Chief Justice Tom Parker wrote: "Even before birth, all human beings have the image of God, and their lives cannot be destroyed without effacing his glory.”
Seems Chief Justice Parker did not elaborate further (that ‘effacing his glory’ was pretty elaborate for a higher court ruling, and, yes - it was a lower-case ‘h’ in ‘his’.. Be that as it may - the Chief Justice did not comment on the research that indicates that around half of all fertilised human eggs do not attach to the uterus, so move out of the body of the female, who is probably unaware that her egg had been fertilised, or that she was effacing the glory of god.
So, in the great state of Alabama, females of reproductive age may be summarily prosecuted under the ‘Wrongful Death of a Minor Act’?
I'm just a little curious as to what they'll have do to to establish that a fertilised zygote actually existed for however short a time. And how will they put a date to the "crime". And when will somebody suppress these idiots ?
Feel like wasting some money. Here’s more Murdoch media tat - https://www.theguardian.com/media/2024/feb/22/foxtel-hubbl-set-top-box-launch-details-price-glass-streaming-channels-cost
Petty Peta: "Illegal migration is a scourge few countries seem able or willing to solve." Yeah, right on. But why is nobody mentioning the illegal immigrant landing near Daintree back in Spud's time ?
ReplyDeleteAsylum seekers from 'people smuggling' boat held as Peter Dutton blames surveillance failure
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-08-27/daintree-suspected-illegal-fishing-boat-two-arrested/10167836
"Mr Dutton said the boat's arrival was the result of a surveillance failure." Oh yes, of course it was. Right along with all those who just fly in as "tourists".
"But the real border control issue today is the record number of asylum seekers, mostly non-genuine, entering as tourists right under Dutton’s nose. He has serious questions to answer on this."
https://www.smh.com.au/national/worst-ever-immigration-minister-asylum-seekers-jet-in-under-dutton-s-nose-20190302-p511d8.html
Forget anything that occurred post-Onion Muncher, GB; Peta certainly has. Based on the featured extract her piece is an exercise in pure nostalgia for 2013-15, when her world was young and she ruled the PMO and pulled the Prime Ministerial strings. She yearns for those days to come again but they never will, leaving her only the spite and bile that is her stock in trade.
DeleteIf I don't ever mention it again then it never really happened, Anony ? But ignoring Peta, I'm just curious that nobody else seems to be mentioning it.
DeleteOh, but here's somebody who does mention it, along with several other aspects of Spud Dutton's career:
DeletePaul Bongiorno: Peter Dutton’s border security offensive takes on water
https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/opinion/2024/02/20/paul-bongiorno-peter-dutton-border-security
And here's the very real problem:
DeleteAlan Kohler: The problem with Australian politics? Both sides agree about everything
https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/opinion/2024/02/22/kohler-politics-bipartisanship
Poor old Corporal Korporaal; one of the less-visible Reptiles, slogging away in the ranks for donkey’s years while never really being mentioned in dispatches. Her problem may that as a business writer, she’s served in an area where journalism tends to be fairly restrained, sober and reasonably fact-based; conservative, but with the occasional exception such as Mein Gott it doesn’t produce too many raving crackpots. Perhaps her embrace of the “woke Woolies”campaign is a final attempt by her to rise from the ranks and become a true Culture Warrior ? Alas, I fear that reinforcements have arrived too late; that battle is over and already largely forgotten. Play “The Last Post” please, bugler.
ReplyDeleteSo "journalism tends to be fairly restrained, sober and reasonably fact-based" - does that apply to Terry McCrann, d'you reckon, Anony ?
DeleteI did wonder about him, GB, but decided that as he considers himself an “economist” (though others may question that) he falls into a field well known for journalistic whackos.
DeleteApropos of NewsCorp's mission statement. Apologies to Tears For Fears.
ReplyDeleteFool The World
Welcome to Oz life
Never mind the facts
We'll put you to sleep
You'll be fine we'll
Just reprogram your behaviour
To believe that Trump's your saviour
All we need to do is fool the world
You will be rewired
You'll have no remorse
You'll believe the lie
That the wokes have
Trashed our freedoms and our pleasures
Smashed our heritage forever
All we need to do is fool the world...
Not Pixies but Fears, Kez.
DeleteCheers GB. How about "Trompe le Monde"?
DeleteJust another one (Pixies) that I've heard of for the first time in my life, but haven't actually heard yet.
DeleteThe reptile cousins across the water have been expressing shock and amazement that a survey of US presidents has placed Trump last of the 45. This immediately triggered the loyalty of ‘presenters’ here on Sky, so last night Blot confected laughter about the survey, with rhetorical ‘Who are these people’ and, the clincher ‘I have never heard of them’.
ReplyDeleteIt was easy enough to find out who those people were - because one Fox character, in talking over the others on their ‘panel’, identified enough for this h’mble to find the -
Results of the 2024 Presidential Greatness Project Expert Survey
https://static.poder360.com.br/2024/02/Grandeza-Presidencial-2024.pdf
which tells us that the survey was conducted by Qualtrics - a firm whose findings usually are accepted without question when they dip into the databases of Australian ‘market research’ providers, and come up with ‘exclusive’ findings for IPA, or the reptiles, claiming to confirm the reptile brain snap of the week, by calling up a minutely specified demographic.
In this case, respondents were sought from the American Political Science Association, and scholars who have recently published peer-reviewed research on presidential politics with recognised academic presses.
After an overall result, the paper offers tables drawing on the declared political ideologies of the 154 respondents. Even at that, avowed Republicans (as of November/December 2023) were not prepared to lift Trump much above ranking in the lowest 5.
Anyway, there are 12 pages of analyses that even the average ‘presenter’ might have worked up into a good story, using names of presidents that some ‘Sky’ viewers might have recognised, but I guess it was all a bit tiring for the Blot to read a whole 12 pages of print.
Memo to Blot - if you have never heard of the participants, you can be even more confident they have never heard of you. It is unlikely that your ‘publications’ are cited by any of the members of APSA, even as salutary examples of misinformation.
And that is the greatest putdown of all, isn't it: he doesn't even qualify as a very good example of being very bad.
DeleteKez says "All we need to do is fool the world"
ReplyDeleteWe are the fools. We qre sleepwalking toward autonomous weapons. And war. We just need the drone operators to slip - once. RoboWar.
"Have you ever been to India ?"
Delete"No"
"Good, I can speak freely, then."
Drones can always speak freely, can't they.
ReplyDeleteFYI: Mobilising opposition to AUKUS – The Marrickville Declaration
How did the reptiles miss this, from 12 February: Naarea and Thorizon team up on molten salt reactors "the two companies have decided to join forces to accelerate the development of MSRs in Europe." ?
ReplyDeleteThey are not a NEWSpaper, so why did you think that they would cover it?
(Oh, and if you guessed that "It expects the first units of XSMR to be produced by 2030" go to the top of the class.)
Ok, so if the first MSRs (note: NOT "modular", just molten salt), then how long before they shake off the 'first release" problems and faults and become genuinely commercially available ? Mid 2030s at a minimum ? And what cost and how long to build ? Several US$1bn per reactor and minimum of 5years to build ?
DeleteI know nothing about the technology, but the cynic (realist?) in me says that if the advocates claim that the tech will be up and running by 2039, we’re looking at circa 2050 - if ever. I’d certainly expect a lot of “just around the corner” updates.
DeleteSkynyet consults Wiki about (in)capability gaps in (un)manned clean-up(s) on Aisle 8:
ReplyDeletehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Crossroads#Test_Charlie
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Wigwam#Detonations
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Status-6_Oceanic_Multipurpose_System#Reactions
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salted_bomb#In_popular_culture
"The purpose of the tests [Operation Crossroads] was to investigate the effect of nuclear weapons on warships." Oh yes, something that the human race, or at least the American component of it, just really had to know.
DeleteReminds me of a cinema newsreel I say way back in the 1960s sometime about how the Australian Army constructed a tower in the northern jungle somewhere and fixed it up with 10,000 tons (IIRC) of TNT to simulate a nuclear bomb, because "One of the questions that must be answered in a nuclear age is: what is the effect of a nuclear bomb on a tropical rainforest." Some poor sod of a sargeant had to climb up the tower to arm the explosives then scamper down again before it went off. He was awarded a medal for bravery for that.
Meanwhile, down there in Alabamy - the law puts science in its place.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68366337
Briefly - some frozen embryos in a fertility clinic in Alabama were destroyed because of an accident in storage. The couples who had provided the eggs and sperm tried to sue the clinic under the state's Wrongful Death of a Minor Act. That law covers foetuses, but did not specifically cover embryos resulting from IVF.
The case went through a couple of judicial levels, to the Alabama Supreme Court, which sided with the couples, and ruled that frozen embryos were considered "children".
The wrongful death law applied to "all unborn children, regardless of their location", the decision said.
Concurring with the majority opinion, Chief Justice Tom Parker wrote: "Even before birth, all human beings have the image of God, and their lives cannot be destroyed without effacing his glory.”
Seems Chief Justice Parker did not elaborate further (that ‘effacing his glory’ was pretty elaborate for a higher court ruling, and, yes - it was a lower-case ‘h’ in ‘his’.. Be that as it may - the Chief Justice did not comment on the research that indicates that around half of all fertilised human eggs do not attach to the uterus, so move out of the body of the female, who is probably unaware that her egg had been fertilised, or that she was effacing the glory of god.
So, in the great state of Alabama, females of reproductive age may be summarily prosecuted under the ‘Wrongful Death of a Minor Act’?
I'm just a little curious as to what they'll have do to to establish that a fertilised zygote actually existed for however short a time. And how will they put a date to the "crime". And when will somebody suppress these idiots ?
DeleteFeel like wasting some money. Here’s more Murdoch media tat - https://www.theguardian.com/media/2024/feb/22/foxtel-hubbl-set-top-box-launch-details-price-glass-streaming-channels-cost
ReplyDelete