Sunday, February 11, 2024

In which Polonius and nattering "Ned" deliver a generous dose of verbiage ...

 

The pond likes to relax on a Sunday, though you could hardly call reading Marina Hyde a relaxing hobby. 

Yesterday, down under time, she was scribbling Trump is too old and incited a coup. Biden is too old and mixes up names. America, how to choose? and the pond got the familiar sensation of seeing the 'roos in the spotlight in Wake in Fright ...

...Biden had almost left the stage last night when he returned to the podium to take a question on the Israel-Gaza conflict, in which he unfortunately referred to the Egyptian leader Abdel Fattah el-Sisi as “the Mexican president”. On the one hand, this was always going to happen just at the moment he was insisting his memory was great, just as it is a truth universally acknowledged that people correcting someone else’s grammar or spelling will normally involuntarily commit some howler of their own in the process. Call it the pedants’ curse – or indeed, the pedant’s curse.

The pond frequently falls pray to the pedant's curse, and to the Hyde dilemma ...

...As someone who believes the likely Republican candidate is hideously, overwhelmingly worse, I fear that Joe Biden is gearing up for a gruelling election at precisely this vibes-based disadvantage. Both he and Trump are at the stage of life when sensible ordinary people find the strength to turn to their families and ask: be honest, should I still be driving? Yet Trump’s great power is defying rationality, like some dark lord of the vibes. He is possessed of a mesmerising ability to make every single thing feel like it is playing into his hands, which is why we now all watch news reports of various criminal charges being brought against him and go, “Oh this’ll play well for him”. Will it? And if so, why should it? Who really knows, but the vibes say so.
After the last time I touched on the gerontocracy in these pages, the Guardian printed three letters from older male readers under the headline, What’s age got to do with it, Marina Hyde? Ageism was mentioned, with one of the correspondents advancing details of how he spent his days, as an argument against what we might kindly have termed my own argument about when big hitters should leave the professional stage. Now, no one more than me welcomes a good bollocking on the letters page, and all the three men were very nice about the rest of my output. Thank you!
However. At the risk of drawing further correspondence, I feel I still have to hold to the position that being president of the United States is not the same as “writing, teaching, and volunteering in a residential home”, and is a job for a younger man than either Biden and Trump. Not a younger woman, of course – that would be genuinely insane in the strictest clinical sense of the term. But younger than 86 at conclusion of office. So I end this column with a challenge: if any readers of this newspaper are able to get to the end of the lengthy forthcoming US election campaign and think it showcased a vibrant, healthy and sprightly democracy, then I urge them to write in on 6 November, and suggest mandatory retirement for me.

And yet here we are and there they'll be in November ... both too old, but seemingly the only alternative a medical event or a nightmare ...

On the upside, when the cracking Crace lets his hair down, he can be quite amiable. 

The pond even began to take an interest in Tottenham Hotspur because he's a football tragic (that's roughly equivalent to Kermode reviewing a wrestling movie). 

Crace skipped lightly over many of the days in his Digested week: media frenzy over king’s cancer does no one any favours, but to his great credit, Rish! can't come at him, and he can't come at Rish!, with this just a culmination of encounters ...

Friday
We’ve gained an insight into Sunak’s soul this week. And what we’ve found there ain’t pretty. First we caught him being bounced into a £1,000 bet with one of journalism’s prime narcissists who tries to conceal his thin-skinned lack of self-worth behind a macho, big-wallet veneer. No one thinks for a minute that Sunak is a betting man, but when push came to shove he was unable to stand up to Piers Morgan. He didn’t have the integrity to say, “I don’t think it’s clever or honourable to make bets on the lives of refugees,” which would have killed the conversation and shown the leadership required of a prime minister.
Sunak showed similar weakness during PMQs when he made a trans joke that he and the health secretary, Victoria Atkins, found hysterically funny. It would have been inappropriate in parliament at the best of times and all the more so when he had been told Esther Ghey was in the gallery watching. Even if you find that kind of gag amusing, most people might have realised this was neither the time or place to offend a grieving parent. Sunak was invited to apologise, but again he proved he does not have the strength of character to admit he had been insensitive. Later that day, Brianna’s father, Peter Spooner, said he had found the prime minister’s remarks “dehumanising” and he too asked for an apology. Sunak merely doubled down, saying it was all Keir Starmer’s fault – come again? – and that maybe Esther and Peter should chill out a bit. They could whistle for their apology. This was a new low. When the UK prime minister picks a fight with the parents of a murdered teenage girl, then the game is up.

All this is by way of filibustering the inevitable, prattling Polonius railing at the ABC ...




A strange portrait of Polonius, that bald egg shape doesn't quite catch the likeness, but the song is the same ...




It's an awkward position for Polonius. If he attacked Barry,  then he might implicitly be thought to be defending the ABC. Of course it being Polonius he wants to invent a variation that allows him to do both ... maintain his rage at the ABC and Barry and Lattouf and the whole damn thing ...

Speaking of persecution, and still seeking distraction, the pond was reminded of a story in Haaretz and also in WaPo, there as A Palestinian posted a message on Oct. 7. Then came the death threats ... (paywall)




In the scheme of things, Lattouf might even begin to count herself as lucky ... she's only facing the endless war by reptile and Jewish lobby grooups ... with Polonius just one of the regular contributorst to the hate fest ... though when you crawl under the rock, the intensity of the lobbying that went down is startling, as can be read in Secret WhatsApp messages show co-ordinated campaign to oust Antoinette Lattouf from ABC ...

As Barry noted in Media Watch, Lattouf's actual appearances on radio - the pond never listens to that form of ABC radio, so has to rely on him - what she said and did was bland and conformed to the station profile. 

ANTOINETTE LATTOUF: But what do you do every year to celebrate the holidays? I want to hear about your Christmas traditions, whether they're religious ones or just quirky ones …- Mornings, ABC Sydney, 19 December, 2023
Most of Lattouf’s short stint on air was spent discussing light and fluffy issues that would have upset nobody:
ANTOINETTE LATTOUF: Is Oli the first cat to sail in the Sydney to Hobart?- Mornings, ABC Sydney, 19 December, 2023
And on day three she was set to sail through the week:
ANTOINETTE LATTOUF: I'm Antoinette Lattouf. I'm back tomorrow. Can't wait. I'll talk to you then. - Mornings, ABC Sydney, 20 December, 2023

There's a reason the pond never listens to 702 or local radio.

But she'd been dubbed an enemy of the people, or at least the Jewish lawyer lobby group ...





Given what's since gone down with allegedly private WhatsApp groups, Hundreds of Jewish creatives have names, details taken in leak, published online, there's a rich irony in the biters bit, and the conspirators revealed ...

The story was also in The Graudian, with talk of death threats, but these days death threats seem to be pro forma ...

Meanwhile, back at that WaPo story, it wasn't just death threats ...




Oh dear, cue Haaretz heretics ...





So what's the benefit of this Polonial rehashing of an already very sorry saga of incompetence, vindictiveness and lobbying at its worst? Be fair, if you say anything about a genocide, you need to be taken down ...




At this point, the pond would usually seize the chance to suggest that's nothing up against what's actually being done to those crammed into a very small space in Gaza ... cue collective punishment, collective displacement, hunger, disease, and many deaths on the road to genocide ...

But instead yesterday there was a curious headline in Haaretz ... Benji wasn't just doing it to Gazans, he was doing it to Israel ...





Amazing really ...




And so on ... and it provided a handy distraction from Polonius's usual bee in bonnet ramblings...




The pond has to rate that as a pretty feeble effort, even by feeble Polonial standards. 

If Polonius was so agitated by the omission at the ABC, he could have insisted that the reptiles insert either appropriate visuals or a sound bite with the offending words in the middle of his own text.

It isn't hard to do - at one point the reptiles were offering "Ned" reading his own words, until terminal boredom intervened.

Of course they never do ... The only media link was in-house to simpering Sharri (disrespect): Sharri Markson exposes protest ‘cover-up’ by NSW Police amid fresh revelations.

Alternatively, Polonius could have linked to YouTube for the footage

Of course they never do, they never want readers to live the hive mind, to step outside the walled garden and breathe fresh air. That would have been pandering to the enemy.

So sadly we're left with a dog with a predictable bark ... (let's forget Polonial fantasies about being an actual dog, though Freudians could have a field day).

Colonel Ross still wore an expression which showed the poor opinion which he had formed of my companion’s ability, but I saw by the Inspector’s face that his attention had been keenly aroused by the Lattouf matter.
“You consider that to be important?” he asked.
“Exceedingly so.”
“Is there any point to which you would wish to draw my attention?”
“To the curious incident of the war in Gaza. The collective punishment, the collective displacement, the famine, the disease, the many deaths on the road to genocide.”
“But the Polonial dog said nothing, barked not once, in the day or the night-time.”
“That was the curious incident,” remarked Sherlock Holmes.

And so to the Everest, "Ned", still trying to deal with tax matters.

Everybody else has moved on, but not the reptiles. 

The pond was confronted with this yesterday as the dog botherer resorted to trash TV to work out a line of defence. 

Alas, "Ned" doesn't even have that ruse in his kit bag ... verbiage is his game, a never ending flow of verbiage, better than glyphosate when it comes to producing a wasteland ...




As Media Watch noted, the reptiles are still reeling from their failed campaign, which was a big and sustained effort ...






Regrouping after all that effort requires a lot of verbiage and in due course "Ned" resorting to another's words to add to the verbiage...




It's possible to smell the fear exuding from "Ned's" pores. It wasn't supposed to be like this. The reptile campaign against the tax changes were supposed to be a slam dunk winner, but now the FUD the reptiles spread has turned, and the fear, uncertainty and doubt is at play in "Ned's"mind ...




At this point what's left of the lizard Oz graphics department inserted a snap of Captain Spud braying and pointing, as a way of geeing up "Ned", and giving the old jellyback a little spine with which to handle his saucy doubts and fears ...




But it wasn't enough ... "Ned" was in full Chicken Little shouting at clouds panic mode ...




Say what? What about those old faithful geysers ...






But "Ned" was inconsolable ...




Thank the long absent lord, a prof to help out "Ned" and explain that what we want is a leader that can be trusted ....






Sorry, the pond couldn't resist the urge to go the Sunday cartoon, especially as the reptiles had decided this would be. their visual break ...




None of it helped "Ned" ... nor his visiting prof ...




Yeah, yeah, though it could be worse ...








Sorry, it's the only way the pond can get to the end of the Everest climb these days, because watching "Ned" try to revive his spirits is enough to send the pond off the bandwagon ...




If the pond might paraphrase, come election day, voters will only remember the reptiles ranting about tax lies and betrayal and forget the rest ... in an election which can still run up to September 2025.

That's the best that "Ned" and his supine prof have got? Is there anybody to hand to tell them that they're dreaming.

The world moves on, shit happens, who knows where we'll be by Xmas, let alone Xmas in July next year ...

Only one thing's certain. By tomorrow, the pond will have completely forgotten "Ned's" drivel, and with it, the lickspittle lackey offerings of this McAllister, the mystery prof cat ...

On the upside, the pond was spared having to deal with other lickspittles ...







22 comments:

  1. So is this the Mark Leach that Polonius and Sky use as their somehow reliable witness of what occurred?
    https://www.eternitynews.com.au/people/mark-leach/
    and
    https://www.eternitynews.com.au/opinion/jordan-petersons-new-book-of-rules-and-what-i-wish-he-would-add/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Poor Paul Kelly. At 76 years of age, there’s no improvement in clear thinking or wisdom in his writings, but perhaps the whole purpose is to confuse his readers with inanities. Apart from the confused metaphors of snooker and arson, he appears to suggest that prior to Labor we had a long run of economic balance under the Coalition, which is like saying we had stability under the trifecta of leaders (not to mention the continual change of ministers) under the Coalition’s 9 years in government. They sure can show Labor a thing or two about stability.

    Then Kelly claims this economic balance “is shifting against productivity, aspiration and meaningful, sustainable gains in living standards.” Just a jiff. How did the Coalitions’ stage three tax cuts improve productivity? Apart from the aspirations of the rich, how did they improve aspiration for anyone else? How did the Coalition’s tax policy bring about sustainable living standards for the majority of people or those on welfare? No answer from Paul Kelly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh pish tush, Anony, there's no point whatsoever in asking rational questions of an irrational Kelly.

      Delete
    2. Would old Ned like to consult with mister McAlister on the integrity of journalist particulary the Murdockracy. FUD an old-fashioned, unimaginative, or pompous person : FUDDY-DUDDY.

      Delete



  3. The person calling herself Marina Hyde seeks to make a case that the judgement of persons around age 80 (declaration - that includes y’r e’v’r h’mble correspondent here) is likely to be flawed when they try to deal with larger issues, just by virtue of their age.

    Yet this comes from a person who entered into a close relationship with - Piers Morgan, at, as far as I can reconstruct, around the age of 30. Which is widely accepted as an age when most adults have achieved their full adult emotional capacities, but difficult to sustain a case that any age group is better at making judgements than any other, just by being of that age group.

    All still readily retrievable from ‘Guardian’ interview by Lynn Barber.

    https://www.theguardian.com/media/2005/nov/20/newspaperformats.mirror

    Which (so others here do not have to suffer Morgan’s cloying self-promotion from almost two decades back) includes

    “ But he liked his new approval rating among the chattering classes, possibly because he had left his wife for the Guardian journalist Marina Hyde. Anyway, while broadsheet commentators praised his new seriousness, Mirror readers scarpered at the rate of thousands a week.”

    Yes, I enjoy much of her writing. but - taking up with Piers Morgan, at any time, in any circumstances - then postulating about the innate capacity of others to make judgements?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well maybe she can claim that she was unwell back in her Morgan days, but now she's much better.

      Delete
    2. My reading of Hyde's comment is not that the older person is innately flawed due to age, but that the position of leader of a country requires a good deal of stamina. Of course, a specific older person may have more stamina than a specific younger person, but surely it would be generally agreed that as one gets older one has less stamina? It is a generalisation, but not without a basis.

      Delete
    3. Ah, but is there any way that a smart "age flawed person" could compensate for that ? Like, by taking short naps during the day ? Or maybe just getting others - of whom a US President has many - to help out with the heavy lifting ?

      Besides, how long do we reckon Joe can last ? In Australia, the median age of death for males is 79 - but that's the median, and these days a significant percentage make it to at least 90 (approximately 203,000 in 2020). Would it be noticeably worse in the USA ?

      Delete
  4. Ned: "Take industrial relations, where the Liberals have run dead for nearly 20 years since WorkChoices." And who was it, can anybody enlighten me, who pushed for 'WorkChoices' during the last majority government in both houses for quite a while.

    Anyway, Ned has found Ian McAllister who gleefully tells us that "...international research shows that leader integrity is a greater driver of how voters view their leaders than at any time in the past." Strangely, I personally prefer a "leader" who is also a follower of their voters desires and needs to someone who will stick to their own desires and beliefs. So I, for one, am happier with this Albanese than with the one who was going to stick inseparably with rampant 'Stage 3' stupidity. How about you ?

    Besides, I've never really believed politician's promises anyway. But McAllister-Cameron reckons I should: "...the most important qualities in determining leader popularity were honesty and trustworthiness." But does sticking to an unwanted, unpopular 'policy' against significant voter opposition (a sizable majority, in fact) count as "honesty and trustworthiness". I don't think so, and apparently about 60% of voters don't think so either.

    PS: The Merica Dream - I don't reckon it's ever taken that many generations; just two is usually plenty.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. PPS: just a comment on how the right wingnuts will never go with what's popular with their electors because they all worshipfully follow Edmund Burke:

      "Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment; and he betrays, instead of serving you, if he sacrifices it to your opinion."
      Edmund Burke, Speech to the Electors of Bristol
      https://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch13s7.html

      Delete
    2. The wingnuts will never mention Burke's other famous remark:
      The most obvious Division of Society is into Rich and Poor; and it is no less obvious, that the Number of the former bear a great Disproportion those of the latter. The whole Business of the Poor is to administer to the Idleness, Folly, and Luxury of the Rich; and that of the Rich, in return, is to find the best Methods of confirming the Slavery and increasing the Burthens of the Poor. In a State of Nature, it is an invariable Law, that a Man's Acquisition are in proportion to his Labours. In a State of Artificial Society, it is a Law constant and as invariable, that those who labour most, enjoy the fewest Things; and that those who labour not at all, have the greatest Number of Enjoyments...
      Edmund Burke (1729-97), A Vindication of Natural Society, 1756 (p536)

      Delete
    3. I wonder if Elon Musk believes any of that, Joe.

      Have I ever mentioned the concept of 'Sunday beliefs' before ?

      Delete
  5. "In the scheme of things, Lattouf might even begin to count herself as lucky ... " Oh yes indeed, unlike some others:

    "Girl who pleaded with Red Crescent to rescue her found dead along with several relatives and two paramedics who tried to save her."

    ‘I’m so scared, please come’: Hind Rajab, six, found dead in Gaza 12 days after cry for help
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/10/im-so-scared-please-come-hind-rajab-six-found-dead-in-gaza-12-days-after-cry-for-help

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don’t care what anybody thinks - I like Ned - so funny, cheers me up no end. I mean, he can’t be serious.

    He is now saying that trust is the big one, backed up by a political expert, and this will come back to bite Albo. But the alternative spin is that lower and middle income earners can trust Albo to look after them, and that view might also linger until the next election.

    Spin. Word salad. Alphabet soup. As a comedian Ned has great material, and tons of it.

    He despairs of Spud (‘The moment of truth is coming for the opposition ... the questions raised this week are what the Coalition stands for ...’), then praises him for his tactics (‘The opposition had no option but to vote for the tax cuts’).

    So would you buy a used car from Spud?

    Really, how does he do it - Ned - comic genius. AG.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A genuine 'buffalo head' you reckon, Anony.

      Delete
  7. In two parts, if I may -

    Amusing juxtaposition

    As an exception to Stutchbury’s steady realignment of ‘FInancial Reivew’ towards ‘Rupert Lite’, Friday’s edition included extract from forthcoming book ‘The Missing Billionaires, A guide to better financial decisions.’ Oh, it also included blatant election material from Amanda Stoker, who even ‘Sky’ is less interested in these days, but - a touch of variety, and a bit daring for a print that otherwise tells us that business ‘leaders’ have all the clues to a bright and beautiful future for us.

    So interesting that much of the explanation for ‘missing billionaires’ - the offspring of one-time billionaires, who had seen their inheritance dwindle away - lay in the observation that most investors are prone to a few common fallacies in their behaviour. That includes many who hang out their shingle as ‘investment advisers’, including many promoted (too often, sadly, for the short term only) in the ‘Fin’.

    The authors use a game, which has been accessible in the ‘Wiki’ for some years, which draws on the ‘Kelly criterion’. The principle of this goes back to the cousins Bernoulli, and the ‘Wiki’ offers interesting cross referencing. Alas, the current entry for the ‘Kelly criterion’ includes red cautions that some of the maths offered does not parse, but the principle can be easily understood.

    The example is about a game in which an electronic ‘penny’ is set to favour heads 60% of the time. Participants are given $25 actual dollars to bet on ‘flips’. Players were sought from persons who worked in finance and investment firms, or were studying to join such firms. Total came to 61 players. The program ran for half an hour, with prospect of about 300 ‘flips’ in that time. When a player’s winnings reached $250 they were retired from the game - for the simple reason that the possible winnings could run much higher than that.

    The ‘Kelly criterion’ is a simple formula for investing a given amount in some continuing activity that has a predictable probability over the long term, even if it changes in the short term - like the toss of a coin. Players were to work out their own strategy; readers not acquainted with this Kelly (
    who worked in Bell Labs in that great period of the 40s and 50s) might like to think up their own strategy - given that they know that the game favours heads 60%.

    So how did the aspiring investors/advisers go? One third lost money overall, and 17 of them - went bust. Twelve reached or sufficiently reached the $250 payout.

    In subsequent discussion, it turned out that 5 players had some acquaintance with the Kelly Criterion. Seems it is not generally included in tertiary financial mathematics, but even those who were aware of it did not necessarily profit from that - one just broke even, one barely doubled his stake.

    ReplyDelete
  8. part the two - as they used to say in the Goon Show

    The Kelly Criterion in this simple case can be expressed as - looking at the nature of the ‘game’, and the probabilities, divide your stake into percentages to play. Between 10% and 20% covers personal inclinations to risk. The ‘trick’, if there is any, is to be utterly disciplined through the entire game. You bet on heads. When you win - recalculate your individual bet from your augmented ‘pot’, but otherwise continue.

    How did so many fail? - all the usual fallacies - usually departing from the discipline because there has been a string of heads, or tails - so the odds on the next flip, somehow, will be different from 60%.

    So interesting that this was prominent in the ‘Fin’, running counter to its steady promotion of business and investment advice.

    By sheer coincidence of name, I amused myself over the ‘Kelly criterion’, as developed in theory, and rarely applied in that ‘real world’ that the blatter try to guide us into, but it would be too much of a distortion to try to bend the mathematical principle into anything that aligns with what our “Ned” - or his Ai - puts up these days. His readers will happily follow their fallacies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've asked it before, and I'll ask it again (and again and ...): how did these nongs ever pass their high school exams, much less Uni exams.

      I look around and the world, despite a century or more of free comprehensive education, is full to the brim with ignoramuses who shouldn't even have passed their Year 8 exams (which in the old days of 'Central Schools' was the end of secondary education).

      Delete
    2. Thought it might amuse you GB. I know I don't have to tell you that there are all sorts of interesting alleys to follow up in probability theory.

      On the broader subject of nongs. I once presided over a seminar by the research people in my organisation. Eager character delivered his observations on two populations of animals, and told the group that he had 'run a Shannon-Weaver on the data' and the result was 'significant'. I asked him to elaborate, if only for my own edification. Seems he had found it in the statistics package he had bought, somehow got it to accept his data, hit the process button, and it delivered a number.

      Delete
    3. Ah, Chad, there are times when I wish I had taken my mathematics study further in my youth, and times I wish I remembered more of what I did study than I do.

      But just for your amusement, here's something I'm still trying to get just a little grasp of:

      Has a mathematician solved the ‘invariant subspace problem’? And what does that even mean?
      https://theconversation.com/has-a-mathematician-solved-the-invariant-subspace-problem-and-what-does-that-even-mean-206859

      And in the meantime, we can contemplate how everybody has their own unique set of Russellian 'Sunday beliefs', don't they.

      Delete
    4. GB - not to spin this out interminably, but, remaining in the vein of amusement - something from John Quiggin on Hilbert, from a decade back - oh, and invoking Lobachevsky!

      https://johnquiggin.com/2014/07/28/austrian-economics-and-flat-earth-geography/

      Delete
  9. Ooh look, Mutt Dutt excelling at all the tuff stuff just like Ned said !

    "Opposition also claims new vehicle emissions standards will hit Australia’s most popular vehicles."
    Coalition would overturn right-to-disconnect legislation, Dutton says
    https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/feb/11/coalition-would-overturn-right-to-disconnect-legislation-dutton-says

    ReplyDelete

Comments older than two days are moderated and there will be a delay in publishing them.