Monday, August 05, 2024

In which there's much Caterist nuking, and a craven Craven, and that wily old bird, the Major Mitchell ...

 

The pond's partner insisted that the pond take note of the Nine papers' very own General Ripper, even sending a link and a screen cap, with the note "The stupid, it burns."

Under protest, the pond did at least promise to observe the latest addition to the canon of stopping the worrying and loving the beermb ...




And so endlessly on.

The pond will grant that this was a fine variant on nuking the country to save the planet, what with the new strategy apparently to nuke the world to save the country, but it did occur to the pond that if we planned it right and became the nuclear mouse that roared, we could perhaps take out thirty million or so Chinese, that would leave a billion or so pretty pissed, and the rest of the planet not particularly happy.

The pond drew a line in the sand about providing a link. Anyone wanting General Ripper's company should be able to find it easily enough ...

The pond had its own weekend reading to celebrate, with the pond's recent inclination to break Godwin's Law vindicated when reading John Naughton's column in The Observer aka Graudian, Silicon Valley’s Trump supporters are dicing with the death of democracy.

As it's up there free for all, there's only a need for a teaser. 

After noting a couple of matters that bring the 1930s to mind, Naughton went on:

...In 1932, the Nazi party was in deep financial trouble and when Hitler became Chancellor the following year he made a personal appeal to business leaders for help. The money rolled in from 17 different business groups, with the largest donations coming from IG Farben and Deutsche Bank. At the time, those donations must have looked like shrewd bets for the industrialists who placed them. But, as the historian Adam Tooze put it in his landmark book on the period, it also meant that German industrialists were “willing partners in the destruction of political pluralism in Germany”. In return for their donations, Tooze wrote, owners and managers of German businesses were granted unprecedented powers to control their workforce, collective bargaining was abolished and wages were frozen at a relatively low level. Corporate profits also rose very rapidly, as did corporate investment. Fascism turned out to be good for business – until it wasn’t.
One wonders if any of these thoughts went through what might loosely be called the minds of the tech titans savouring their $300,000 dinners on a June evening in San Francisco. My guess is not. The denizens of Silicon Valley, you see, really don’t do history, because they’re in the business of creating the future. Accordingly, they have nothing to learn from the past.
Which is a pity, because history has some lessons for them. Those German industrialists who decided in 1933 that they had to back Hitler might not have had a clear idea of what he had in store for Germany and possibly knew nothing of his plans for the “final solution”. David Sacks’s dinner guests, though, have no such excuse: Project 2025, the plans for Trump’s second term, are out in the open in a 900-page document on the web.

And so on, and even better Naughton provided provided a link to a piece by Timothy Snyder in his Substack, with Synder having a go at the bane of the pond's life, especially when reading the NY Times ... Both Sides

Again only a teaser is needed, with Synder offering a quite liturgical take.

...Both-Sidesism is another dualism.  When confronting a phenomenon, for example an election or a party convention, the acolytes of Both Sides perform two steps.  They reduce events to two personalities, then treat them as equal aspects of the two-headed divinity known as Both Sides. 
Again: that there only two sides, and that the two aspects are the same, are unspoken articles of faith.
Once this initial ritual has been performed, the task of the priesthood is to sense disturbances that disrupt the apparent equality of the two aspects of Both Sides. The mythic utterances of the priests of Both Sides – bad journalism -- resolve the cultic tension that appears when a difference between the two aspects emerges. 
Equality is restored in a peculiar way, one that emphasizes the sacred character of the dual god, at the expense of understanding reality.  The priests cannot undo the deeds of one aspect of Both Sides – for example a coup attempt or a call to deport millions.  And if they described it accurately, they would only be deepening the mystical inequality between Both Sides’ two aspects.  They must normalize.
Our Both-Sides priests correct the mystical imbalance with two mantric maneuvers.  The first is to proclaim, groundlessly, that the perpetrator of the crime has learned his lesson, executed a pivot, turned a corner.  The second is to humiliate the other side, the one that did nothing.  And thus the mystical equilibrium between the two aspects of Both Sides is restored. 
This normalization has consequences.  If one of the two aspects of Both Sides seems to have done a great evil, the priests of Both Sides always ritually vituperate the other side.  The price of the restoration of mystical equality is the rehabilitation of the criminal and the degradation of the blameless.

Synder exempts actual investigative journalists from his ravaging, but he should also have exempted those wretched purveyors of lies that don't even attempt both siderism ...w

Witness the reptiles of the lizard of Oz, where there is only one side, a fanatical kind of monotheism that brooks no alternative.

As usual, the pond scanned this day's headlines for examples ...




Bingo. It was cackling Claire that jumped in boots and all on the shameless treatment of the female (the pond uses the word advisedly) Algerian boxer, and judging by her pitch in the lizard Oz, putting herself in the transphobic camp alongside Vlad the Sociopath, the Hungarians and the likes of the despicable Rowling.

Luckily the pond could avoid all that by turning to old school favourite the Caterist, also wanting to nuke the planet ... and offering up the usual ironies for those with a memory longer than a gnat ...




Yes, the flood waters in quarries whisperer and climate science denialist (and, speaking of Hungarians, a lover of despots of the Orbán kind,always generous with handouts to indigent scribblers) was back on the nuclear bandwagon, with a fine array of snaps and a video to help ...





The Caterist was outraged at the refusal to tear up the country ...




This is where the reptile irony machine kicks in to high gear.

Note the opening lines of the next gobbet:




Please allow the pond to repeat the Caterist line: "Digging it out of the ground and selling it on the international market is the most effective contribution Australia could make to the global effort to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and advance prosperity."

Say what? Why should we be worried about reducing emissions, save perhaps those of the Caterist?

Here was the Caterist scribbling Unsettled science for the Speccie mob back in 2015 (caution, you'll be rewarding the Speccie mob with a click) ... with the pond just picking up a bit of the undiluted scepticism ...




What need for the global effort to reduce carbon dioxide emissions?

All's well in the world, there is ice in the winter, and the growth in spring is just around the corner, and we can leave the the uranium in the ground and save the country from despoliation, an important consideration for the flood waters in quarries whisperer, because his latest climate science denialist riff has been ranting about the way that renewables of the solar panel and wind turbine kind simply ruin the landscape and the bush and all those sweet bush creatures ...

And with the irony overload fully compleat, a final gobbet of ripping it all up and shipping it out (no, if you ship the Caterist to Hungary, likely it will only be temporary) ...




In its search for its irony fix, the pond came across this indignant squawk by the Caterist in response to Quarterly Essay 43 ...

That was back when he was earning a dishonest living as the editor of the Weekend Australian, rather than his recent fawning and simpering over despots.

Climate science copped a mention ...




Naturally this was before the Caterist's own heroic contributions to denialism in the lizard Oz, roughly one in every one piece he's scribbled, not to mention his Speccie mob moonlighting.

Here, have a cartoon to celebrate ...



Bad news was to follow. It seems that the craven Craven has decided to set up a Monday perch, a new home after the ACU turfed him out (or they agreed to part ways, whatever)...

His topic was populism, a subject he managed to discuss without once mentioning the deeds of that supreme populist, the chairman emeritus, or any of his tabloids, or the contribution that Faux Noise has made to the United States in pursuit of the futile attempt to satiate unmitigated greed ...

In that sense, it's a singular achievement, of the kind only a craven Craven could manage ...




The reptiles provided the craven Craven with a satisfyingly eclectic set of huge stills, all handily in the public domain, and thereby saving the remnants of the graphics department's budget ...





The craven Craven seems to think that the mango Mussolini has become a populist without mentioning the channel that supported, indulged and craved his populism ...such that he turned to it for help in his desperate hour of need with a desperate plea ...





You won't find any of that in the craven Craven ...




Always with the history lessons, the first refuge of lizard Oz scoundrels of the hole in the bucket man kind ...




It's possibly true that Hanson herself never dominated Australian politics, and was something of a distraction.

But what need of her, when the lying rodent took over all her policies and proclaimed to the world that we will defend our borders and we will decide who comes to this country?

Could the orange Jesus or Pauline herself put it any better? Could they outshine that master of populism, stealing from wannabe populists?

The reality is that we must assert and maintain the undoubted right we have as a sovereign nation to control our borders. It is the first element in a basic national security policy not only to have adequate defences for the country but also to have the right to decide who comes to this country and the circumstances in which they come.

So it goes, a virulent form of populism celebrated by the Murdochian tabloids around the land ever since, and still a staple diet for aspirational populist the mutton Dutton, but never mind, we've reached the final line about a donkey, by a donkey, for donkeys ...




A fair go? You can find any number of mugs peddling this sort of crap, and yet ...




That talk of a fair go gave the pond its one dinkum horse laugh for the day ... have a cartoon to celebrate magical transformations ...




And now as the Major has already been mentioned in despatches, the pond will indulge the Major, though it takes the pond way over length ...





The pond hasn't given much thought to education since the grand days of dashing Donners in the lizard Oz, always ready to suggest a Catholic education as the way forward, but the pond promises that there will be an irony at the end ... though it's a hard slog to get through the Major congratulating himself and his fellow reptiles in an orgy of self-esteem...





The pond hates to tell the Major, but all that rote memorisation of French produced in the pond was a few stock phrases, of absolutely no utility (and even more so Latin, though the pond can still remember that Caesar sent Servius Galba with the Twelfth Legion into the territory of the Nantuates).

If you want to learn a language, forget memorisation, mingle with tolerant native speakers ...

Why is it that the reptiles somehow manage to think that the world should stay stuck in the 1950s with "this column"

Must everything be refracted through the Major's desperate search to find that long missing Order of Lenin medal?




At this point the reptiles interrupted the Major with the one still he was allowed ...




Then it was back to the Major ranting and more quoting of himself in the guise of "this column showed ...", which is to say how money for privileged private schools was a jolly good thing, you know, the "fair go" school of lizard oz journalism ...




The pond realised at this point that the pond had promised a Major Mitchell irony - no, it's not the usual blather about culture warriors from a culture warrior - and it eventually came, though in the last line...




Finland and Singapore? 

The pond can understand Singapore, it being the sort of soft authoritarian one party state that the Major would love wholeheartedly, but Finland? 

Surely not, surely the pond must remind the Major of just how devious and deviant those Fins are, with their socialist, neigh, almost leftie ways ...

Per the start of Matt Bruenig's piece in Jacobin, No, Finland Is Not a "Capitalist Paradise" ...



And that's more than enough herpetology studies for the day. Go socialism and socialists, the Major has your Finnish back ...

The pond will close by doing a catch-up with the infallible Pope  (incidentally a reminder of just how dull David Speers has managed to make The Insiders), and the immortal Rowe ...





11 comments:

  1. Hi Dorothy,

    yet another piece of finely researched analysis from the flood waters man.

    The chemical formula for triuranium octoxide is (U3O8) not (UO).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 😎 ta, DW, the pond never pays attention when the Caterist turns from amateur sociologist to amateur scientist, but clearly there are rich treasures to be found.

The pond was inspired to head off to the relevant wiki ...



      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triuranium_octoxide



      If the pond had followed the Caterist it would have missed out on all the appropriate safety precautions...



      https://www.energy.gov/nnsa/articles/sds-uranium-oxide-u3o8

      Delete
    2. One of those strange compounds where valences don't add up: O usually has valency of two (as in H2O for example) but here the uranium has an apparent valency of 8/3=2.67 (ie 2+2/3) and the O has an apparent valency of 3/8. Very odd, but no stranger than the very first 'inert gas' compound ever created, Xenon hexafluoride (XeF6).

      Delete
    3. DiddyWrote - the Cater is not noted for scientific precision at any level, but that probably is acceptable in the world of many sociologists. That doesn’t stop him from disdaining science that does not accord with Rupert’s feelings, but a little familiarity with the language of science would leave him less exposed, as when he also disdains those old, hidebound, conventions of chemistry.

      I would also suggest he is not particularly good with add-ups and takeaways. On this day, he tells us that ‘The government will miss out on tens of billions of dollars in royalties and taxes that would have flowed over the mine’s lifetime.’

      The mineral extractors have always been good at boosting the supposed value of what they are about to dig out, almost invariably taking initial production figures, at current value, and multiplying by their estimated reserves, with no discounting for externalities, such as effects of competition. They are also good at claiming the taxes paid by all sectors of their operations as contributions to government revenue. That is true up to a point - but the proper perspective here is the opportunity costs of mining against other uses of those inputs, including fuel (mining generally has its fuel excise rebated) and labour. Any such comparison should also consider the implicit subsidies that go into mining, but, of course, the miners are not going to spend their money to tell us about that. So our Cater is being glib at best in extolling the taxes that the government would, supposedly, miss out on.

      It is difficult to project royalties, from selling uranium, into numbers like ‘tens of billions of dollars’. Australia in recent years has sold around $800 million worth of uranium each year. Most of that comes from South Australia. The long-term rate of royalty in SA is 3.5%, and new operations my qualify for an introductory rate of 1.5%. For convenience, let’s stay with the higher rate. That gives annual royalty income approaching $30 million, in a good year. Now, Nick, maaate - how many tens of billions in royalties are you dangling in front of us? The lifetime of a mine? You do realise that a billion is a thousand times a million, don’t you? So, all other things being equal (which they seldom are) your mines need to be around for a long time to get aggregate royalties into the multiple $billions.

      Assuming that our Cater has simply taken some promotional paragraphs from the mining lobby to get to his ‘tens of billions’, I suspect amounts at that level are made up of a lot of income taxes on human workers, rather than royalties returning resource rent to the general citizenry, and the true perspective comes from the opportunity cost of all inputs into mining, if applied to other industries. But I doubt that the sociology taught at Exeter delved very deeply into opportunity costs.

      Delete
    4. I don't think any of us were conned into thinking that NickC had actually go something right, Chad, but it is good to have chapter and verse. Every chapter and every tiny little verse. :-)

      Delete
  2. Hartcher is as dumb as a plough in an attic!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You mean like this, Anony:

      https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-the-16th-century-plough-and-attic-rooms-pub-rusper-west-sussex-england-32280099.html

      Delete
  3. "If the pond had followed the Caterist it would have missed out on all the appropriate safety precautions".

    Tell your kids, buy waterpoofs, a boat, and some very warm jackets... and tell them about bifurcations. They or their kids will find out the hard way. Not via newscorpse. "What need for the global effort to reduce carbon dioxide emissions?
    "All's well in the world, there is ice in the winter," - plenty.

    "you’re in for an astonishing show. Here the heavy AMOC water doesn’t merely sink, it plummets nearly 3 kilometers down. (Two miles!) Some 3 million cubic meters of water fall per second, in what amounts to the world’s most record-smashing, invisible waterfall. 
    ...
    "But, that warming hole. This spot isn’t feeling the full kapow of rising global temperatures because, in recent years, less heat has been arriving from the tropics. Which means the currents must be slowing. By some calculations, the AMOC’s flow has weakened by 15 percent since the middle of the 20th century. Looking back further, it is the weakest it has been in a millennium.
    ...
    "and others studied the ancient ice, that they made a wild, monumental discovery. In the last glacial period, Greenland warmed up to 16 degrees Celsius in a mere 50 years. That’s an astonishing, rapid jump, 
    ...
    "The heat blast wasn’t a fluke—abrupt, giant swings had happened 25 times. Cooling events took a bit longer but were still swift.
    ...
    "Once you’ve pushed a system to its tipping point, you’ve removed all brakes. No exit. As one 500-page report recently put it, climate tipping points “pose some of the gravest threats faced by humanity.” Crossing one, the report goes on, “will severely damage our planet’s life-support systems and threaten the stability of our societies.”
    ...
    https://www.wired.com/story/amoc-collapse-atlantic-ocean/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What "the flood waters in quarries whisperer and climate science denialist" tells us from a press release - aka she'll be right x on!.:
      "When asked to comment for this story about its 2018 scenario plan and overall record on CCS, ExxonMobil sent the following statement by email: “False narratives that downplay our CCS efforts deliberately fail to recognize the strides we’re making in our Low Carbon Solutions business. Referencing one possible scenario from over six years ago does not represent our business outlook. We continuously evaluate our business plan based on market conditions.”

      Reality.
      3% usedul.
      97%÷2 - so
      48.5% carbon SOLD as greenwashing profit. The other
      48.5%? FURTIVE.
      = 97% of carbon return - to rhe atmosphere! Running AMOC.

      "According to Exxon’s own disclosures and an analysis conducted by IEEFA in 2022, only around 3 percent of the carbon captured there (roughly 6 million tonnes) has been permanently sequestered underground. Of the rest of the 240 million tonnes of carbon emitted over the facility’s first 35 years in operation, half has been sold to various oilfield operators for enhanced oil recovery, or EOR — a process by which oil companies inject carbon underground to get more oil out — and approximately 120 million tonnes has been vented into the atmosphere."
      ...
      https://www.vox.com/climate/363076/climate-change-solution-shell-exxon-mobil-carbon-capture

      Delete
    2. Earth Temperature Timeline
      https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/earth_temperature_timeline.png

      Delete
  4. We need a one sider. Rick in Casablance tells the Deutsches Bank representaive [GERMAN] to piss off... to the bar.

    ABDUL This gentleman -- The German interrupts and waves his card. GERMAN I've been in every gambling room between Honolulu and Berlin and if you think I'm going to be kept out of a saloon like this, you're very much mistaken..... Rick looks at the German calmly, takes the card out of his hand, and tears it up.
    RICK Your cash is good at the bar.
    GERMAN What ! Do you know who I am?
    RICK I do . You ' re lucky the bar ' s open to you.
    GERMAN This is outrageous. I shall report it to the Angriff ! The German storms off, tossing the pieces of his card into the air behind him.

    ReplyDelete

Comments older than two days are moderated and there will be a delay in publishing them.