Monday, March 13, 2023

In which the pond begins with a hint of citronella, before celebrating Dame Slap, doing a bit of rent-seeking with the Caterist and becoming a puffer fish in approved Major style ...



In other news, Tories demanding impartiality, a tugging of the forelock by a lad born of a greengrocer, while appointing a Tory spiv to head an organisation requiring Tory impartiality...

But that's a story from a distant land, and this day the pond takes as its text Robert Frost's ...

They cannot look out far.
The cannot look in deep.
But when was that ever a bar
To any watch they keep? (in full here).

Whatever Frost's original intention, is there any better evocation of the reptiles slaving away in the house of Murdoch? 

They can't look too far, or they might spot those Tories in the Graudian, Pressure on BBC chair mounts over Gary Lineker suspension, and they can never look in deep, and today's offerings are particularly wretched and pathetic, so the pond thought it might start with a most excellent jolly jape amongst chums ...

You see while Petronella became an instant pond favourite - not least because of the way her name evoked fragrant hints of mozzarella, citronella, salmonella and the tarantella - she's hardly prolific, and saves her best efforts for witttering tweets. 

Recently she produced a stunning foray into Godwin's Law territory and the notion of Nazi socialism - a theme beloved of far right loons - and the question as to whether Nazis might be deemed fascist. 

It's all in the aptly named Poke's Daily Mail columnist Petronella Wyatt said ‘Nazis weren’t fascists’ and was schooled into next year, with many tweets ... but the pond took particular delight in this closer...







It was perfect, and the pond nodded off to sleep, only to be rudely woken up by Claire given front and centre billing ...






Oh Claire, Claire, that's an EXCLUSIVE

Nah, not really, because back in July 2012 Stephanie Bunbury was scribbling in what was then Fairfax Rewrites a blight on Blyton's legacy ... by golly ...

In the past couple of years, however, Blyton's publishers in Britain have endeavoured to wring yet more cream out of their cash cow by updating the texts. In 2010, they released the first 10 Famous Fives in the new ''timeless'' language. According to their research, they say, the books sound so dated that they appeal more to parents' nostalgia than to the children for whom they were written. ''These days,'' said Marlene Johnson, the managing director of Hachette's children's books division, earlier this year, ''you don't talk about jolly japes to kids''.
The adventures remained the same, Hachette insisted. There were no gratuitous 21st-century add-ons: no rescues achieved through the use of mobile phones, no snuggling in front of breakfast television; no question that Uncle Quentin was locking himself in his study in order to watch online porn. ''Sensitive revisions'' simply replaced Mother and Father with Mum and Dad, cut out words such as ''jolly'' and ''wizard'', eliminated gay fairgrounds and queer happenings where the words' modern meanings might be distracting or shocking and - now, this is jolly queer - replacing supposedly outmoded words, such as ditching ''peculiar'' for ''strange''.
There were some tweaks to fit modern sensibilities, too; Blyton's insistence on the obligations of girls to make sandwiches has gone the way of golliwogs and the sadistic Dame Slap in the Faraway Tree, who was reduced to reprimanding children as ''Dame Snap'' in an earlier round of Blyton reforms. George still wanted to be a boy - given that this is a major plot point in every Famous Five book, it would be difficult to excise - but less was made of the shortness of her hair.

Eek, a tranny in Enid, and you had to go back to 1943 to enjoy this sort of Dame Slap spin-off in all her Slappian glory ...








Talk about vintage. Meanwhile, in the Graudian, back in October 2014, Alison Flood, in Enid Blyton - not as good as she used to be, was also worried for Dame Slap ...

There’s no way in the world I think children should be slapped, but nor do I think they should be locked in cages, à la Hansel and Gretel, forced to sleep in a cupboard under the stairs, à la Harry Potter, and I’m not even going to get into Goodnight, Mister Tom. It’s a story. Dame Slap was a good character; Dame Snap, not so much. 

You see, Claire, without wishing to do down your EXCLUSIVE, the re-writes began way back before the intertubes, in the 1990s ...

Meanwhile, in a planet far removed from Claire's world, some serious book banning shit is going down, due in no small part to Ron DeSanctimonious (sorry, there's a WaPo paywall) ...







Well yes, it was summarised in the Daily Beast this way ...







Pro tip. Reading the reptiles aloud will make many people feel uncomfortable ...

And there, dear Petronella, is your quintessential definition of a man with fascist instincts, and if he bans like a duck,  chances are he's a fascist duck, what with Banned in the USA: The Growing Movement to Censor Books in Schools, with the resemblances between the Taliban and the GOP growing stronger by the day ...

But there is good news. Dame Slap still exists, and she continues her slapping ways in the lizard Oz, and evidently the reptiles realised that Monday had dropped off with the banishing of the Oreo, so there Dame Slap was handing out a slapping in the triptych of terror ...










Dame Slap followed that up by going to the top of the commentary pile ...









Start the debate over? In what alternative reptile universe?

She's bloody obsessed, and the pond notes the agitated way that she gets upset by talk of racist arguments, and yet ... can anyone explain Dame Slap's constant urge to slap down difficult, uppity, awkward, deplorable black people, without noting at least a tinge of, if not outright racism, then at least unhealthy blonde obsession?

She really had made an excellent attempt to become the Petronella down under, though perhaps more salmonella than citronella ...

Never mind, the pond is well over Dame Slap, and so had to turn to see who else was out and about this day ...








Oh dear, not the bromancer still blathering on about the subs, and Killer Creighon too, and yet the reptiles themselves had produced another EXCLUSIVE ...










Two hundred billion? Dear sweet long absent lord, but luckily the Caterist knew where to extract some budget savings ...








Ah yes, the price of a Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarine, and all to take care of rent-seekers.

But there's good news, because in deploring rent-seekers, the Caterist has announced that the Menzies Research Centre will no longer stick out its paw and demand government grants.

Astonishing, but that's the devotion of the Caterist to the onerous task of deploring rent seekers, grifters and hypocritical buffoons ...







Sorry, sorry, the pond got that wrong. The floodwaters in quarries whisperer and grifting government grant rent seeker will carry on business as usual, because you know, what happened in the Second Fleet in 1790 is a sterling example to grifters today ...









Yes, you can read the details of how to grift and rent seek here, and no need to go back to the Second Fleet to discover how it's done ...








And so on and on, it's a favourite pond sport, and the pond will likely run it until the cows come home to roost, as we come to the rent-seeking grifter's last gobbet for the day...







Yes, it will take far more political courage than is so far apparent for the Menzies Research Centre to keep snout out of trough and end the rorting ...

And so to the Major Mitchell, just because the pond would miss the squawking on a Monday from its favourite bird ...







Not bloody Gary Banks and super all over again.

But the pond didn't say it would be interesting, and in fact the galah that the pond's parents once cruelly kept in a cage had a wider range of interests, and a most excellent diverse set of squawks ... whereas the Major these days squawks by rote, when not imitating the grandiosity of a puffer fish ...







The pond realises that anyone who pondered over that Major set of figuring might wonder at the reference to the Major as puffer fish, but relax here it comes ...







There you go ... the Major as puffer fish, puffing himself and the reptiles of the lizard Oz up to a splendid size.

As for that wondrous line about the rag serving the interests of its proprietors, what to say about the delusional notion that it might be otherwise?

In all, the Major has done it again, with a fine serve of grandiosity, narcissism, and an infinite capacity to admire the fluff gathered from constant navel gazing ...

The pond was immediately swept away, back to Ed Pilkington in The Graudian, and ‘Lachlan’s in the mire’: Fox News case spells trouble for Murdoch heir ...

...Similar hard-headed, business-first logic has defined Murdoch’s approach to Trump. “Whether he loved Trump or loathed him, for Lachlan there was an overwhelming commercial logic in following the news cycle and in creating audiences where there was a gap in the market, on the right,” Manning writes.
The watchdog Media Matters for America has noted that the lock-tight relationship between Fox and Trump coincided with Lachlan’s rise within the family business. “Fox News’ transformation into an unchained pro-Trump propaganda outlet came as Lachlan Murdoch’s control over the network steadily increased,” it reported.
The hand of Lachlan can be seen behind the emergence of Tucker Carlson as Fox’s provocateur-in-chief. When Carlson has shocked even Fox sensibilities by suggesting that immigrants make America “dirtier” or by embracing the white supremacist “great replacement” theory, it was Murdoch who rushed to his defense.
Yet again this week Carlson pushed the limits of Fox credibility by airing security footage of the 6 January 2021 insurrection at the US Capitol and distorting it to make the event seem like “peaceful chaos”. His latest escapade earned a rebuke from the Republican leader in the US Senate, Mitch McConnell, and denoted a level of hypocrisy given that Dominion documents were simultaneously exposing Carlson as having said in private that “I hate [Trump] passionately”.
“Lachlan has defended Tucker Carlson in the past, and this week’s January 6 effort suggests he continues to defend him,” Manning, speaking from Tasmania, told the Guardian. “The question is, will he do so in the future? I still believe that it is an iron law in the Murdoch empire that no one is indispensable, except at the vertex.”
Following his own formula, Manning sees Lachlan Murdoch as indispensable for as long as his father, who is 91, is alive and in the driving seat. “There is no question that Lachlan is the designated successor, and while Rupert is around his position is secure.”
But thereafter?

It's a much better, and more amusing read than the Major ... but at last the pond has reached the final gobbet of the day, so no need to worry about the thereafter for the moment ...






Years of prattle about climate and diversity? That's called projection because the reptiles are full of prattle, and not just Polonius, and if you want anything more than their prattle, you should look elsewhere, or turn to the immortal Rowe ... helping out the Caterist ...









It's always in the detail, and strangely you won't find the Major or the Caterist or pretty much any of the lizard Oz reptiles explaining what happened in this Second Fleet ...










16 comments:

  1. Just a quicky on the way through, but has anybody found any reference to "Sturgess's Law' ? The nearest my MickeySoft browser could find was Sturge's Rule which is about how many bins to use in a histogram. And Sturgeon's Law too, but of course.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ooh, maybe that's it; via the Cater: False incentives lead to perverse consequences. Now it would take a reptile in full flight to enunciate that. Umm, there are flying reptiles, aren't there ? The ones that leap from trees:
      "Some snakes are known to "fly," gliding from tree to tree. But these reptiles can actually hurl themselves into the air."
      https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/jumping-flying-snakes-australia-evolution

      Delete
    2. Oh: "As public policy academic Gary Sturgess observed in his 2017 study of the mortality rates on convict ships, the quality of the service delivered is dtermined by the framing of the contract." Oh yes, right: the standard reptile contract with the standard reptile outcome.

      Delete
    3. You might like this GB ...

      https://anzsog.edu.au/news/contracts-and-convicts-how-perverse-incentives-created-the-death-fleet/

      It seems it's more a lesson than a rule or a law ...

      Sturgess, Argyrous and Rahman remind us:

      “… This is an important lesson: contractual form should follow service function. Contract models suitable for buying pencils and light bulbs will not work particularly well in procuring the delivery of complex human services.”

      The pond isn't sure of the merits of the lesson. Surely the Robodebt model showed how to deliver complex human services in a way any Caterist would love and worship ...

      Delete
    4. Jeez, so they reckon that the service you get depends on the contract you write. Bloody 'mazin, hey, hooda thunk it. Next thing might just be that not only does the contract matter, but its enforcement is just moderately important too.

      And yeah, how come the reptiles, and the flood-whisperer Cater in particular, aren't praising Robodebt to the skies ?

      Delete
    5. PS it takes two to tango, so they say, and that means that the contract winner is also part of the attendant 'moral bargain'. It really isn't possible to cover every little thing in a contract, so the contractor must also behave honourably.

      The second fleet slavers didn't have the faintest idea what that word means.

      Delete
  2. So there we have it: "We can only hope the NDIS review Shorten has commissioned will further illuminate the complex dynamics of this government-designed, government-run faux-market that depends of [sic] government capital and government price control." Oh yes, Cater knows all about government capital, doesn't he.

    But: "The scheme was legislated in 2013 and went into full operation in 2020."
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Disability_Insurance_Scheme

    And guess who was in government for that whole time.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bit of a stretch yet this rhymes.

    Noam Chomsky, Ian Roberts and Jeffrey Watumull serendipitously almost describe both the Major, abNews & NYT, whilst boosting the very model they describe. Are they intelligent? Own goal. Wrong place to publish.

    "The False Promise of ChatGPT
    ... "Note, for all the seemingly sophisticated thought and language, the moral indifference born of unintelligence. Here, ChatGPT exhibits something like the banality of evil: plagiarism and apathy and obviation. It summarizes the standard arguments in the literature by a kind of super-autocomplete, refuses to take a stand on anything, pleads not merely ignorance but lack of intelligence and ultimately offers a “just following orders” defense, shifting responsibility to its creators."
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/08/opinion/noam-chomsky-chatgpt-ai.html

    They don't understand who is NYT- the Company issirected by! Roblox! E&Y! AIG = Vampire Squid!
    "... While [Carlos] Slim is the largest shareholder in the company,

    "Board of directors
    As of May 2022:[46]
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Times_Company

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. NYTimes is gated, so I missed out on that one.

      But oh, the NYT Board of Directors (other than Carlos):
      A. G. Sulzberger, chairman of the New York Times Company and publisher of the New York Times
      Aman Bhutani, CEO of GoDaddy
      Manuel Bronstein, CPO of Roblox
      Beth Brooke, former global vice chair of public policy for Ernst & Young
      Rachel Glaser, CFO of Etsy
      Arthur Golden, bestselling author
      Hays Golden, former AIG executive
      Meredith Kopit Levien, CEO of the New York Times Company
      Brian McAndrews, former chairman and CEO of Pandora Media
      David Perpich, former president of Wirecutter
      John W. Rogers Jr., founder of Ariel Investments
      Doreen Tobin, former CFO of Verizon
      Rebecca Van Dyck, CMO of Reality Labs

      I've never heard of any of 'em, other than C. Slim.

      Delete
  4. Dorothy - thank you for the cover illustration of ‘Dame Slap and Her School’. Just wonderful, and we might assume it is from the other Dorothy - Dorothy M Wheeler - who has credit for the pictures to that volume.

    That was also blessed relief in a morning of wading through sludge. I assume the Cater is trying to generate a new, distinctly Aussie, measure of value, much like our famous ‘Sydharb’ as a measure of water volume. US Senator Everett Dirksen was attributed the quote “A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking real money.” There is some doubt anyway about what Dirksen actually said, but it is a useful quote. As the Cater seems to live in a different time warp, it might have escaped his notice that Dirksen died over 50 years ago, when a $billion was of some significance, but, no matter - it seems we will have a measure of currency ‘The Virginia’ - for around $10 billion, or so, as a convenient measure of money wasted on schemes to improve human welfare, rather than being properly directed towards toys for the admirals.

    Will pass on DeSantis triggering a ban on Jodi Picoult - some kinds of stupid just do not warrant attempts at analysis.

    The Major - on economic analysis? Setting aside the out and out cant of what the fourth estate is supposed to be about (Rupert has set all that out in nicely succinct quotes recently), our Major claims to instruct us on who pays tax - but with no mention of GST, which is a substantial contributor to government income, and paid by just about everyone, other than a few eccentrics who are truly self-sufficient - after they have paid 10% on all the gadgets they need to get to that happy condition.

    As for ‘Few journalists have the wit to point out people with (superannuation balances above $3 million) have probably paid a lot of tax during their lifetime.’ Nice try, Major, but, setting aside the quintiles you cherry-pick below - the fact is that, as you move up the annual income scale, into the high hundreds of thousands/ millions, payment of income tax becomes increasingly voluntary. Look at the obfuscation around people with multiple ‘investment properties’ and their supposed taxable incomes. They have apparently modest taxable incomes precisely because their salaries and investments are structured to achieve that outcome.

    I note our Major could not find a cherry to pick out, to characterise the lifelong contributions to income tax of those who have accumulated more than $3 million in their superannuation.

    Might I be the second one to use the Cater’s new monetary measure - to say that the cost of the Stage Three tax reductions will cost the rest of the nation a mere 20 ‘Virginias’. Hardly worth bothering about, when seen like that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hmm, De Santis' ban on Jodi Picoult: how many 'bans' will it take before the citizenry revolt ? Many ? Very very many ? They will never revolt, they're all GOPsters ?

      Just curious - "book burning" in one form or another has always been a very successful human endeavor.

      As has tax evasion, especially as you note, amongst the 'multi-propertied' citizenry. And here's just a short list of some of the tax deductions they can claim:
      21 investment property tax deductions you can claim
      https://www.realestate.com.au/advice/investment-property-tax-deductions-what-you-do-not-want-to-miss-out-on/

      Negative gearing anybody ?

      Delete
  5. For a long time, the most expensive violin in the world was the "Lady Blunt" Stradivarius, which sold for over €15 million. But then, violins made by Guiseppe Guarneri del Gesu were auctioned off for more than €16 and 18 million after 2010. Alright I'm being picky about Cater, but it illustrates his failings, he doesn't check what he writes, and he doesn't keep up. I guess it wasn't reported in The Oz that Stradivarius violins are not the most expensive.
    Then with his talk of contracts he doesn't realise he is highlighting why privatising is a bad idea. Once contracted out it is difficult to change anything. If you keep it in the public service you can change things with a phone call.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Now I've heard it all: a "retired" US commander of nuclear subs reckons that if China tried to 'blockade' Taiwan, all it would take is one American nuclear sub to defeat the blockade. Apparently just one nuke sub carries enough weapons to completely defend itself against the entire Chinese naval fleet (including China's 12 nuke subs), and also to send missiles off - even across Taiwan - to sink every Chinese vessel and shoot down every Chinese warplane in the area.

    I'd like to know then how many nuke subs it would take to defend Australia: 2 or maybe 3 ? So why are we buying so many ?

    I was in the car at the time so I didn't get his name - did anybody else catch that ABC radio (621 in Melbourne) around 13:30 today ?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi GB. I heard that too. According to the Radio National website info for The World Today , his name is "David Marquet, former US Navy submarine commander, author of 'Turn the Ship Around'."

    This site tells you what programs were on today:
    https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/guide&ved=2ahUKEwiW2pLW2Nj9AhXjT2wGHblUDgQQFnoECA4QAQ&usg=AOvVaw0NMNj7J5jnMnI_BzMiNSyb
    He sounds like the kind of guy the Bromancer fantasises about being.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah, muchos gracias, Kez, and he really did say that: just one single nuclear sub would stop the Chinese from blockading Taiwan. And how many are we getting ? Australia could rule the world with half a dozen of them.

      Delete
  8. At the end of yet another wonderful Melbourne Moomba and celebrating Labour day, a little commentary on how the wondrous Judeo-Christian Western Civilisation has been practised in Britain and Australia.

    ‘I couldn’t love her’: the last UK child migrants to Australia on the long, lonely search for their mothers
    https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/mar/13/i-couldnt-love-her-the-last-uk-child-migrants-to-australia-on-the-long-lonely-search-for-their-mothers

    "Seven thousand British children were sent to Australia last century, told they were orphans or unwanted. It wasn’t true. Now facing old age, 1,400 are still searching for their families."

    "Instead of being collected by his mother at the war’s end, at the age of five he was shipped to Australia and placed in the Castledare Boys Home, run by the Christian Brothers, where numerous boys were starved, beaten and subjected to sexual abuse. He was told his mother was dead."

    ReplyDelete

Comments older than two days are moderated and there will be a delay in publishing them.