Ready for the humongous reptile climb this day?
Got your gear on? Yes, it's teal, but how better to get the reptiles in a frenzy? Let's do it now, let's do it live ...
You see, the reptiles are in a state of panic this day, as the man who refused to hold the hose now apparently refuses to hold the economy ... and even the soft sections of Murdoch la la land are having a go, with the likes of Samantha Maiden disinterring corpses of the Unearthed clip shows Scott Morrison backing shared equity scheme during GFC kind.
Sure, at the top of the digital page, and splashed all over the tree killer edition, was another terrifying spectacle, a nightmare on the prowl, a bombshell ...
But look past the tech titan's energy bombshell, sidestep ancient Troy conjuring up hard-left Albo, don't get distracted by that eye candy, and you'll see that the bromancer arrived in time to occupy centre stage with even more alarming news ... the colour teal is the most hideous interior decorator flourish ever devised, and will likely ruin more dwellings than floral wallpaper ...
Since when has standing for parliament become a thought crime? Possibly since it looks like a few seats might tumble for the man who refuses to hold the hose or the economy or any interest rate rise ... and so the bromancer rose to one of his usual apoplectic apocalyptic flights of righteous anger ... but it was a tad strange, because immediately after that first gobbet, the reptiles an an ad highlighting an independent coming at ya ...
At least the pond thought at first blush that it was an ad and exceedingly kind and generous on the part of the reptiles.
Why there was even a name and a helpful arrow to point out these fiends, and naturally the bromancer went right off at these wretched extremist populists with their beguiling smiles and toffy, poncy, upper crust accents...
Speaking of narcissistic tantrums, it would be rude of the pond to interrupt the bromancer in full narcissist flight, but the reptiles did, sticking in two click bait videos, which required careful neutering ...
Mr Frydenberg recounted a story where independent candidate Dr Monique Ryan’s mother-in-law approached him and said she would be voting for him.
Dr Ryan has accused the Treasurer of misquoting the incident to embarrass her, however, she has conceded her mother-in-law is a Liberal voter.
So now we have a coherent government? Just asking for a friend, as the pond couldn't help but notice that the comments section didn't just feature the usual groaning and a couple of lizard Oz editorials ...
Look, IPA ahoy, it's Freedumb boy!
Usually the pond wouldn't waste space on a pollie lurking behind the reptile paywall, but back in the day, Freedumb boy gave the world, and the pond, so much, it would be almost criminal to ignore him, especially as he was taking up the bromancer cry that a vote for hideous wall colours of the teal kind would lead to chaos, populism and extremism ...(and might affect re-sale value in a shrinking property market where your basic, clean Ikea white finish always helps) ...
Did the bromancer help Freedumb boy with his homework, or did freedumb boy manage to go back to the ancient days of Clive all by himself?
Never mind, freedumb boy's sensitivity probably goes back to old wounds he's still scratching ...as with this 2021 encounter ...
Please, be fair ... ever since his IPA coal-loving days, freedumb boy has taken a measured Plimerish view of the world ... who could forget his balanced Plimerish approach in 2012?
Yes, you appalling interior decorators, Freedumb boy has been a dab hand at the right colour schemes for yonks ... ever thought about basic coal black? It's still a Newtown fave, though the goths are long gone ...
Freedumb boy's rallying cry?
...Littered with statements that quickly counter the perception that scepticism amounts to heresy, Plimer asserts his views as mainstream within public discussion.
He also seeks to bring the known unknowns around climate science back to the fore, critiquing the discredited Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and its Summaries for Policymakers, which he argued ‘is not a summary at all but state pre-ordained conclusions’.
Edging into the economic and policy space Plimer also punches hard, highlighting the development of a climate industrial complex with the large number of departments, academics and non-government organisations now wedded to catastrophic climate change being real for their own survival. What’s worse is that as governments finance these same groups, the voices and vested interests to wind back bad government policy also become more active.
As a straight shooter Plimer also takes on his critics. Tackling the well-known scandals that have exposed the groupthink within the climate science community, Plimer provides examples of how the conduct of some in the climate science community has contributed to diminishing public confidence in scientific analysis.
In particular he takes aim at the demonisation of those who dispute the arguments of academic Michael Mann, who was found in the leaked Climategate emails to have sought to malign qualified astronomers as ‘astrologers’ because they disagreed with him.
Where Plimer makes his most meaningful contribution is in the most recognisably disputable area of the science of climate change about projections resulting from computer models. As he argues, ‘computer models do not constitute evidence’, especially when there are known but impossible to simulate variables included, such as cloud formations.
In making his arguments Plimer succeeds in presenting his dispassionate case as a sober and rational contribution weighted by the evidence he provides.
Oh those were the days, and since Freedumb boy seemed so interested in the past, the pond thought it might help by going there too ... but now a last brief gobbet of Freedumb boy, sounding terribly bromancer in the present ... what with those wretched teals assaulting democracy and quite possibly Gina's mob at the IPA ...
And so at last to a good groaning, though perhaps a cartoon might help those struggling to continue on the journey ...
No, no, no, he held a hose, what is it with curries?
Oh okay, Josh and mother-in-law jokes are still in ...
And now, please stand back, make room for the groaner ...
Dear sweet long absent lord, how is this groaning helping? Doesn't Dame Groan realise the real challenge for the property market is the number of feature walls painted with a bilious teal green look?
The pond has gone on too long already, and will only note that in that gobbet, Dame Groan managed to move from an opening "unsurprisingly" to a closing "it is hardly surprising."
And yes it is hardly surprising that the pond is pleased that this is the last gobbet of inflationary doom and gloom ...
At this point, the pond would usually up stakes and take its tummy ache to the dentist for a good drilling, but there was one poignant reptile out and about this day in urgent need of love and care. You see all that groaning and doom and glooming put the bouffant one in a funk and it only takes a couple of pond gobbets to show the pond love ...
First there was a snap, much more beguiling than the coins and notes the reptiles had perfunctorily lumped on Dame Groan ...
You have to hand it to the reptiles, they know how to pick an attractive snap to go with "trust us". And then came the despairing gobbet from the rather unkempt and unhappy bouffant one, Shanners without the best gloss...
It just got a whole lot harder to sell? But it's not about him, it's about us and our profligate ways ...
So tomorrow, it is not about me. It is not about Mr Albanese... it is about Australians themselves and the decisions they are making ...
Yes, go hold your own hose, but what a perfect way to segue into a closer with the immortal Rowe, with more always be closing Rowe here ...
Bromancer - ‘A minority government relying on single-issue populists and extremists is a recipe for instability and incoherence.’
ReplyDeleteYep - that pretty much describes the current minority of Liberal members, in what they claim is a coalition (details commercial in confidence) with what is increasingly exposed as a bunch of single-issue populists - some for gas, some for coal, some for water (to their electorate, and damn those downstream of them), but mainly for - themselves. And we are seeing instability and incoherence.
Oh - and the Bro could have spent a minute or two getting some clues on how aluminium is produced. Could have read up on it even as he was binging on Netflix, and gained/retained some idea for his day job.
Yeah, and quite a few "I just wanna be in parliament and get an MP's salary and pension for not ever doing much". I woulda gone for that myself if only I'd known.
DeleteOh, and re aluminium production and greenhouse gases:
DeleteNew technology could slash carbon emissions from aluminium production
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/may/10/new-technology-slash-aluminium-production-carbon-emissions
So why would the Bro be rejecting a "technology not taxation" solution ?
The Dame Groaned herself about half way to some actual economic discussion in saying we should ‘remind ourselves of Milton Friedman’s proposition on inflation’.
ReplyDeleteShe then focuses on growth in money supply, where Friedman said the phenomenon is produced ONLY by a more rapid increase in the quantity of money than in output.’
Fortunately, the essential equation should be easy to reproduce in this format
MV = Py
M is the supply of money, V is its velocity, P the price level and - although lower case, so seemingly less important - y is the gross domestic product. The ‘output’ if you would. The thing that ‘the economy’ is supposed to be about.
We have been through a period when central banks have put essentially no value on money in the sense of setting minimal - in some cases, negative - interest rates. That was done in the expressed hope that industry and commerce would invest in ways that would boost productivity - and even out the equation.
A few entrepreneurs established entirely new businesses, but most settled CEOs set about acquisitions and mergers, often with the aim of reducing competition in their field (they all praise competition at public conferences, detest it in private), boosting their own ‘incentive’ bonuses - but generally with the collective outcome of reducing productivity.
Of course, for the Dame to suggest anything like that would put her offside with ‘business’ in this country, and make her ‘opinion’ much less saleable to Rupert.
You know I always used to wonder - back in the days when economic innocents used to think that money was some real, physical thing like gold - where they thought all the additional money needed for all the additional people as population rose, and rose, came from. They couldn't really have believed that it came from raising the value of gold to astronomical levels, could they ?
DeleteGB - it can be fun at dinner parties to ask people around the table how much tangible money - notes and coins - is available in this country. More interesting to make that 'per capita', and compare guesses. On the most recent Reserve Bank figures, there is around $3 700 per man, woman and child. Include children, because a surprising number of them are legally partners in some or other family assets. The rest of what we think of as 'money' exists as bits of electronic memory. If that system were to take a big enough hit - you would see some impressive redenomination.
DeleteI hope somebody's got it all written down in a big ledger somewhere.
DeleteGod does.
DeleteWhich one ?
DeleteAll of 'em!
DeleteBut I don't understand Hindi. Does Brahma, Vishnu or Shiva write and speak English ?
Delete"...will likely ruin more dwellings than floral wallpaper..." Oh DP, you bring back such memories ...
ReplyDelete" when the pond caved and looked up the Josh video, it was of astonishing banality ..."
ReplyDeleteOh, quelle surprise !
The Bromancer in full narcissistic tantrum: "So a candidate with 43 per cent loses to the candidate with 25 per cent."
ReplyDeleteNo, Bro, the candidate with 43 per cent loses to the candidate with 25+15+10 = 50 per cent. Which is very much how it should be. But any bullshit in a political turmoil, eh
And here we go again: "Her absurd non-answer [re whether she'll back Lib or Lab] included the excuse that Labor has not released all its policies. So after nine years of Coalition government and despite endless detailed pledges from Labor, Spender really has no preference between the two?" Oh dear, so if she won't come out and whisper confidentially to the Bromancer which party she'll guarantee supply to, that's somehow 'absurd' ?
And what if all she really wants to know is whether $loMo will be PM or not - and if not, she'll favour Libs, and if yes, she'll favour Labs. Zali Steggall (for one) has already said so:
Zali Steggall more likely to support Coalition in hung parliament if Scott Morrison dumped
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/apr/01/zali-steggall-more-likely-to-support-coalition-in-hung-parliament-if-scott-morrison-dumped
Now how absurd is that ?
Feel free to shoot me down on this — but, the way I read this “more likely
Delete“ is not the same thing as “most likely”. A 40% chance is more than a 30% chance but not an outright chance.
Why all the hedging about the Nationals? “ Steggall said her constituents in Warringah – the blue ribbon seat she wrested from the Liberals in 2019 – were “incredibly frustrated at the stranglehold the Nationals … have over government policy, particularly around climate”.”
Unless they are in on the grift themselves it’s hard to imagine how well educated voters could see it in their interest to support the National’s shitfuckery. Like in the case of the US, the government doesn’t so much support business and the wealthy, but rather the niche interests of the super-rich oligarchs (why don’t we call them that?)
Dunno - I've been calling them that for a while, even to the point of telling the UAP folks that I would never vote for an oligarch (ie Clive) - though I might vote for Mike or Simon if they ever personally stand.
DeleteAs for Steggall, I reckon she'd probably prefer to go with the LNP, but likoo ge any sane person, she doesn't want to go with $loMo. I understand she's mostly voted with the government - about 60% - rather than the Opposition this time round.
"likoo ge" ?? just "like" will do.
DeleteJosh Frydenberg is 171cm (5 ft 7 in) tall. No wonder he didn't bother becoming a professional tennis player.
ReplyDeleteAw c'mon, Rod Laver was only about 3/4 inch taller (1.83m) and he won all four grand slams in a single year twice (1962 and 1969).
DeleteIs this a test? That’s about 4 3/4” inches.
DeleteThis is all very important if you are a tall person
Ooops, my bad. Laver was 1.73m not 1.83m. At 1.83m he'd have been just a shade over 6ft.
Delete