Fox’s decision to settle with the Rich family came just before its marquee hosts, Lou Dobbs and Sean Hannity, were set to be questioned under oath in the case, a potentially embarrassing moment. And Fox paid so much that the network didn’t have to apologize for the May 2017 story on FoxNews.com.
But there was one curious provision that Fox insisted on: The settlement had to be kept secret for a month — until after the Nov. 3 election. The exhausted plaintiffs agreed.
Why did Fox care about keeping the Rich settlement secret for the final month of the Trump re-election campaign? Why was it important to the company, which calls itself a news organization, that one of the biggest lies of the Trump era remain unresolved for that period? Was Fox afraid that admitting it was wrong would incite the president’s wrath? Did network executives fear backlash from their increasingly radicalized audience, which has been gravitating to other conservative outlets?
The unusual arrangement underscores how deeply entwined Fox has become in the Trump camp’s disinformation efforts and the dangerous paranoia they set off, culminating in the fatal attack on the Capitol 11 days ago. The network parroted lies from Trump and his more sinister allies for years, ultimately amplifying the president’s enormous deceptions about the election’s outcome, further radicalizing many of Mr. Trump’s supporters.
The man arrested after rampaging through the Capitol with zip-tie handcuffs had proudly posted to Facebook a photograph with his shotgun and Fox Business on a giant screen in the background. The woman fatally shot as she pushed her way inside the House chamber had engaged Fox contributors dozens of times on Twitter, NPR reported.
High profile Fox voices, with occasional exceptions, not only fed the baseless belief that the election had been stolen, but they helped frame Jan. 6 as a decisive day of reckoning, when their audience’s dreams of overturning the election could be realized. And the network’s role in fueling pro-Trump extremism is nothing new: Fox has long been the favorite channel of pro-Trump militants. The man who mailed pipe bombs to CNN in 2018 watched Fox News “religiously,” according to his lawyers’ sentencing memorandum, and believed Mr. Hannity’s claim that Democrats were “encouraging mob violence” against people like him...
Rather, he urged them to march peacefully?
Of course when you're a reformed, recovering feminist, you're entirely comfortable with distorting, dissembling and outright lying.
But why did the pond find the Oreo's defence rose to the necessary level of rich irony required to gain entrance to the pond?
Well there was this story at SBS, one that can be found all over the web ... (with more under 'I Answered the Call of My President') ...
In the two weeks since a raging mob stormed the Capitol, US President Donald Trump has shown no sign that he believes he shares responsibility for the worst incursion on the halls of Congress in more than two centuries.
Shielding him further, his loyalists have started shifting blame for the attack to an array of distracting bogeymen: far-left anti-fascists, Black Lives Matter activists, even vague conspiracies of a setup involving Vice President Mike Pence.
But one group of people has already come forward and directly implicated Mr Trump in the riot at the Capitol: some of his own supporters who were arrested while taking part in it.
In court papers and interviews, at least four pro-Trump rioters have said they joined the march that spiraled into violence in part because the president encouraged them to do so.
In the past few days, a retired firefighter charged with assaulting members of the Capitol Police force told a friend he went to the building following “the president’s instructions,” according to a criminal complaint, and a Texas realtor accused of breaching the building told a reporter that by protesting in Washington, she had “answered the call of my president.”
A Virginia man has told the FBI that he and his cousin marched on the Capitol because Mr Trump said “something about taking Pennsylvania Avenue.” And a lawyer for the so-called QAnon Shaman — who invaded the building in a Viking costume — said that Mr Trump was culpable, and he planned to ask the White House for a pardon.
“Does our president bear responsibility?” the lawyer, Al Watkins, told The New York Times. “Hell, yes, he does.”
Oh it's rich, and being a recovering, reformed feminist, the Oreo gets even richer in her love for the defamed pussy groper ...
Oh they're so mean to the Donald, and it's so hard for the Oreo to let go ...
To read the Oreo up close is a dispiriting exercise ... but the pond does so hope that the United States drives the Oreo ever deeper into despair, especially as the reptiles, always a sucker for ironies, had this coupling for her return to the fray ...
Here, have a cartoon celebrating the inflammatory left ...
And so to today's efforts, and Killer Creighton leads the way.
The pond thinks that the Killer became the reptile star of 2020. He abandoned any pretence at being about economics, and instead began to roam far and wide, and today he shows that in 2021 he will keep on roaming ...
Why the inverted commas around "cases"? You know, a case is a case is a case, or perhaps even a rose...
Ah, that's the Killer for you, and just to get his next gobbet off to a flying start, please allow the pond to agonise over whether to call him an entitled snowflake, or an up himself fuckwit ...
Whatever, can the pond dedicate the Killer's line about his fortunate job to those who wear masks all the time as a result of the work they do ... sanders, welders, doctors and nurses in the grip of an eight hour operation, and such like ...
What the fuck? Where's the "humiliation" in wearing a mask and protecting a neighbour, a relative, a friend, or a passing stranger?
Once again the Killer shows he's going to be in epic DLP form in 2021 ...
And so to a few alarming notes.
After the Oreo's railing at big tech, the pond was startled by news of her beloved's attitude ... even though there's only a few days left for the Emperor to do his thing ...
By golly, the reptiles down under will have to start schmoozing with Joe if they want their dreams to come true ...
Oh it's all too confusing for the pond. Wasn't the Donald the reptiles dearly beloved hero? What went wrong, why is he doing this at one minute to midnight, and setting a precedent that rascally Joe might follow, what with him being filled full of malarkey ...?
That's it? They've contacted the ACCC for comment?
And finally a note from the lizard editorialist about the war on China, which it should be said, is going spiffingly well, following expert advice tendered to the reptiles, and so repeated by the lizard Oz editorialist, always willing to follow the example of the sheep in Animal Farm ...
Ah, Lord Downer's adviser has spoken, and naturally it's a sophisticated view, and there's no doubt that many others will want dinkum, pure, innocent, clean, virginal Oz coal, because they share the reptile aim of fucking the planet ... and not just a little bit, but in a comprehensive way.
Bring on fresh markets is the reptile cry ...
Oh dear, that can't be right. Do go on, lizard editorialist ...
Good luck with all that, and so to the Rowe of the day, with more Rowe here ...
The Fox lawsuit story is paywall-free here
ReplyDeletehttps://citybuzznews.com/2021/01/fox-agreed-to-pay-for-telling-lies-but-it-insisted-on-one-unusual-condition/
For your amusement
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/01/worst-revolution-ever/617623/
"Once inside, they were bent on proving themselves fierce and intimidating—and they were those things. But when they got to the National Statuary Hall, on the second floor, where velvet ropes indicate the path that tourists must take, they immediately sorted themselves into a line and walked through it. In other words, they were biddable. They were men (and, yes, some women) lost in a modern world that no longer assumed they come first. They were looking for someone to tell them what to do. Trump told them what to do. So did the velvet ropes."
Ah, the Atlantic: home to one of the great 'popular' science writers, Ed Yong. I'll have to remember to look him up more often - he's done some great work on the COVID:
DeleteWhere Year Two of the Pandemic Will Take Us
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/12/pandemic-year-two/617528/
Anyway, back to the ferocious uprising: it just keeps reminding me that about 60% of humanity (all genders and breeds - since humanity does not have races) is terminally stupid and that at least 45% qualify as moronic, imbecilic or idiotic - to use the standard hierarchy of mental retardation.
Not that it is "retardation" - which would imply failing to achieve some kind of 'normal' level of intelligence - it is just the normal, native state for a large section of humanity. and even those who might actually qualify on a test as having an IQ as high as 105 are basically not very bright.
Doesn't give us the warm feeling of 'great expectations', does it. And boy is humanity working very hard to live right down to our worst fears.
Hi BF & GB,
DeleteThis is from a few months ago;
https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20200923-why-arrogance-is-dangerously-contagious
When I read it, I was instantly put in mind of Trump and his rallies for his ‘deplorables’.
No matter how stupid the idea, the Tangerine Tyrant was always supremely confidant in his delivery and the crowd quickly picked up on this over-confidence and mimicked it.
No wonder they are surprised that many of them are now being arrested.
Dunning-Kruger appears to be contagious.
On a slightly different note, I think by now we have all become somewhat habituated to the numerous odd psychoses and strange world views that form the reptile hive mind but I was truly taken aback by Killer Creighton’s feeling humiliated by having to wear a mask for a few minutes.
Humiliation? What the Fuck! Little Adam appears to have some truly weird hangups.
DW
DW - perhaps he suffers claustrophobia? I had that thought and, never having need to find out about that particular phobia, have just consulted the Wiki. Part of the discussion there suggests that there are two components - fear of restriction and fear of suffocation.
DeleteAnd in best Wiki fashion - the article suggests the reader look at other subjects, including fear of being buried alive, or (the new word for today) 'vivisepulture'.
Hmmm - fear of suffocation, or of being buried alive - 'Killer - are you there?'
Reading that arrogance article, DW, I was reminded of (the disgraced) Garrison Keilor's description of Lake Wobegon where: "…the women are strong, the men are good-looking, and all the children are above average." And aren't we all ?
DeleteI dunno, though: we are constantly told to have confidence in our own abilities because, well, success doesn't come to the constantly self-deprecating, does it. And indeed we can even get annoyed by people who repeatedly claim to be helpless or incapable.
So perhaps it's a matter of having some kind of reality check that maybe helps us avoid being either over or under confident. But how often, for instance, do we get a real reality check on our day-to-day driving ? Now I know I used to be an above average city traffic driver because I had to pass a police advanced driving test to get my cab driver's licence back in 1965, but I don't know how I'd go nowadays (apart from being 55 years older now).
As to Killer C, well Chad may be right, or Killer C may just be one of those people who resent/get aggressive about any attempt to make them do someting and/or tell them what to do. Especially when, as he apparently does, they think what they're being told is bad or ridiculous - or even just pointless, as apparently a considerable number of Americans do. Or just something to show their rebellion over - everybody can't make it in to invade the Capitol, after all.
Was just shuffling through some 'YouTube' and up rolled a clip of Rowan Dean interviewing Killer. Tried to watch, but soon realised that Killer is inclined to drop one or two 'You knows' as fillers into every sentence. I find that irritating - yes it is a filler, but my mental response is 'Mate, if we knew - we would not need to watch/listen to you to find out, so, if you cannot find another filler, why not try to so marshall your thoughts that you impart your opinion directly, and with clarity?'
ReplyDeleteAsking just a bit too much of him there, I suspect, Chad. He doesn't really marshall his thoughts too well in what he writes, but at least he can edit the "fillers" out before submitting for publication.
Delete