Saturday, March 23, 2019

In which the pond spends an idle Saturday morning with a couple of lizard Oz hate merchants ...


Ten million smackeroos?! Talk about big spenders, talk about bright lights and big cities … or perhaps talk about an even sillier, monstrously stupid splash aimed apparently at helping Gladys …


It's curious? It's even curiouser how our Adam could attempt to compare and contrast a digitally wired nation with improving the private and corporate boxes on a couple of sports fields …

Well the pond couldn't go there. Surrealism had its day in the last century, and besides, the ever-reliable Dame Slap was out and about with an even better absurdity …


Dame Slap proposing tolerance? Dame Slap worried about tearing down opponents? 

The pond immediately scored a bookies' bag and began running a tote all up on the first moment that Dame Slap would produce more heat than light and tear down an opponent …but sadly the only punters the pond could find wouldn't accept the very short odds on offer …


But, butt, billy goat, but, the entire business model of the lizards of Oz, their tabloid companions, and Sky after dark is to be an outrage industry. 

And polarised politics didn't create  that business model. Chairman Rupert and his minions did. They are the ones in a state of constant outrage, whipping up up anger, creating fear and loathing …(and to prove the point, down below the pond will introduce the dog botherer, minor war criminal and master of the art of outrage …)

It was Dame Slap, after all, who donned the MAGA cap and swanned out into the street hoping to provoke, and anyone who is a Donald follower is surely someone who has no time for wisdom, reading, tolerance, or differing points to view…

And so to the first moment where the pond would have been willing to pay out to punters, if anybody had been silly enough to pay the pond double for being right... 


But, butt, Billy goat, butt, here's the thing. When the mutton Dutton said Fraser had made a mistake letting in Lebanese Muslims, he wasn't talking about immigration policy. He was doing a dog whistle of the worst kind, smearing an entire group and a religion. That's not a debate, that's just old school deep north plod fear mongering.

In the same way, the onion muncher frequently found the existence of homosexuals and their insistence on gay marriage offensive, and kept on saying it over and over again … and ditto his climate science denialism, and now look where that history has got him …


Never mind, see the moment where the coins began to clink out of the Dame Slap poker machine?

Count the cash: the indignation at GetUp, Sara Saleh (kinda funny name), the ABC, and Twitter … and then there was lazy groupthinker Alison Carabine …

… as if lazy groupthink was a phenomenon unknown in reptile la la land, seeing as how this typical set of targets fits into the reptile group thinking, week in, week out.

And how had Carabine offended the Dame?


So there's your balanced, calm, refusal to tear down opponents and instead engage in rational discourse. 

Rant about blinkered three legged high moral horses, throw all the blame on the Europeans, berate the ABC some more, abuse their intellectual muscle mass, call students a bunch of mindless sheep incapable of thinking for themselves, defend the Ramsay Centre, and never mind that the reptiles routinely hailed it as an important way of elevating white Western Civilisation, explain how even if the Europeans were all to blame, we must study wise European thinkers, and then as a capper dismiss an opponent as blathering utter nonsense …

What was the theme again? 


Consider yourself torn down wretched Reimer, but at least we've produced much heat, and found no need for light… just more fearless crusaders crusading away with the same passion as the original mob heading off to the Holy Land ...


But, butt, Billy goat, dragging in world war II is the last refuge of the desperate, a scoundrel patriot argument passing as a debating point …

And Brown is a Milo groupie, and she is notorious, and a nanosecond's googling would provide ample evidence … 

This just one tweet in favour of a man the federal government found a little too hot to handle in the current climate …


But butt Billy goat, she sounds just like Dame Slap defending the indefensible.

The pond shouldn't be surprised: the entire Dame Slap business model invokes the yoke of extremism that hates difference, especially if the difference is greenie, leftie, the ABC, cardigan wearers snowflakes and such like …

But didn't she get in some jolly good licks by shouting at everyone in the vicinity … even if it's true she didn't quite go the full Milo and Brown …because here's Brown showing her Milo style ...

(here)

But Dame Slap did put in a good word for Brown and so for Milo, and lo, let there be heat for spineless cunts …

And with all that heat and tearing down of opponents, what better way to top it off than with a serve of the dog botherer …


Oh roll the jaffas down the aisle, not the hate merchants at the lizard Oz ranting about toxic debate and leftist vitriol yet again… 

How do do it? Why by adopting the Dame Slap model and offering a toxic assault, and barking mad, howling abuse, in the direction of the moon, lefties, the ABC, academics and all the rest of the usual mob …typical lizard Oz commentary of the classic kind …

Well the pond's offering no odds about when the dog botherer will stick in the boot. He's not wearing his patented, steel-capped Clockwork Orange droog boots for nothing …


Say what? A massacre of Muslims won't draw us closer to that terrible sense of vulnerability to which many Muslim communities have become accustomed?

It could have been more bizarre, he could have substituted Christians for Muslims, but please allow the pond to pre-empt a little of the rest of dog botherer's rant.

You see, for years the Murdochians have made out like bandits demonising Muslims, and refugees and such like … and then suddenly they had to deal with an event that was uncomfortably a little too close to home…

Deflection and avoidance has been a growth industry these past few weeks, with the Europeans to blame and the terrorist not at all home grown … and yet ...

(More Wilcox here)

Would they be contrite, might they even apologise, might they promise to do better? Nope, they'd head off into their denialism fortress, pull up the drawbridge and shout abuse from across the moat …and perhaps offer a bit of both siderism to boot ...


A cesspit, green-left spite, balanced by a sprinkling of hard right bile? Well we shall see what we shall see...

In the interim, a correction: surely the Murdochian 'leet commentary has seldom looked so puerile, intolerant, defensive and outraged …

As for Twitter, doesn't it just do what the Donald does on a daily basis? You know the Donald that the MAGA hat-wearing Dame Slap slipped out into the New York night to celebrate? The one who conducts government business by Twitter, no matter the chaos and confusion it produces, whether it be North Korea or the Golan Heights (just to mention a couple of the more recent outings). 

And speaking of caps …


But Dr Freud, what's the real problem here with the dog botherer and Twitter? 

Well Dr Jung, it's common amongst narcissists with personality disorders, and it frequently involves them mistaking their own navel fluff for that of the world's …



And there's your balanced debating and discussion in a dog bothering nutshell.

You see, the dog botherer can't actually get enough of the abuse, the hostility and the anger. It probably gives him an endorphin hit, and twiddling a few thumbs is a heck of a lot easier than running the marathon …just as pounding a key board must be a cathartic way to assault all and sundry …

And how can the pond say that about his furious scribbling? 

Well as soon as someone says "so-called", they've abandoned any desire for coherent thought or logical argument, in favour of a default negative connotation. It's the sort of usage you find amongst the "so-called" journalists at the lizard Oz ...


Oh they don't like it up 'em, do they?

There they were, frolicking away, dishing it out, spreading the fear, whipping up the hate, doing a fine lot of mongering, without a care in the world, and suddenly the chooks came home to roost …and then how they squawked when the record over the years was hauled out and looked at. Oh they don't like it up 'em, do they? Not when it's there in black and white, on the telly and over the airwaves ...

But the pond has already been over the wretched, squalid Islamic-bashing behaviour of the reptiles for years, which goes way beyond pious atheists pointing out that their god is just another imaginary friend like the one the fundamentalist Xians speak in tongues to …

Never mind, no need to go over all that old rope, because it turns out that an elegant Rowe cartoon will suffice, with an elegant sufficiency of Rowe always on hand here



10 comments:

  1. From the journal Nature, scariest photo ever, https://media.nature.com/w800/magazine-assets/d41586-019-00873-9/d41586-019-00873-9_16540548.jpg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hmm, it must be Saladin month or something. Anyway, something also from "the men who invented global terror" (see below):

      "The Sufis thought that God had sent Genghis Khan as a punishment for the decadent luxury of Shah Muhammad’s court. The scourge of Allah was also Allah’s instrument. The crusaders thought something similar of Saladin".

      So what do you reckon, Joe - was Trump sent by God as a punishment for the decadent luxury of GOPish America ?

      Delete
    2. "So what do you reckon, Joe - was Trump sent by God as a punishment for the decadent luxury of GOPish America?"

      From where I sit Donnie Dimwit was sent by that dark part of the Australian soul that produced one R. Murdoch, for without Murdoch there is no Dinki Di Dinkum Donnie.

      Delete
    3. Ah but, butt JM, as William Cowper once said, "God moves in a mysterious ways; His wonders to perform". He'd be quite capable of making a Murdoch (well, actually, an extended family of them).

      After all, he himself "came out of a woman’s privates", and virgin ones, at that.

      Delete
    4. Sorry GB, that won't wash. Ask your average American, he will tell you that the same cultural currents that ran thru your capital of Vienna's coffee houses 95 years ago that formed a certain corporal/failed painter's outlook are what today produced a Murdoch and his spawn Dinkum Donnie.
      Since Paul Hogan rediscovered Australia in 1986 while hunting Crocs, other than Arch Duke Ferdinand, Murdoch is your most famous citizen. He is probably one of the top 10 most influential people in the world. Somebody is responsible for that, and it ain't Jersey(the original "Garden State", not like that Johnny come lately Victoria).

      Delete
    5. Umm, well if I asked "my" average American anything, I'd be surprised if he knew the answer (the average American citizen is a whiteskin he, isn't he ? Otherwise even God may not have been able to get Trump elected).

      But what makes you think Rupert Murdoch is "one of the top 10 most influential people in the world" ? Just because your "average American" believes all his media outlets implicitly and Fox News is commonly mistaken for Bible Readings Online ?

      Personally, I think our Roopie is basically Dorian Grey without the picture.

      Delete
    6. GB, The ignorance of your average "yobbo" that dwells south of the Mason Dixon Line is staggering. They proudly will tell you nothing matters outside of 'Merica, and 99 out of a 100 would confuse Austria with Australia. Slobdom is on the march, it's cry whatever Murdoch's media tells them it is that day. That's why I say Murdoch is so influential, he has liberated the worst elements in our society to spill out hatreds that would never have been tolerated 10 years ago. And they now have their Slob King.

      Delete
    7. The only reason I was so sure about my average American, JM, is because my average Aussie us just about as bad, if not actually worse. But serious hatreds have been tolerated, and even promoted, both here and there, for a lot longer than Murdoch has been around. For instance, I don't reckon he, or his media empire, had anything much to do with the KKK. Nor in motivating, for instance, Andrew Kehoe. Nor Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols, come to that.

      I agree that he and his minions have acquired quite a public following in recent times, but just how influential they are is still an open question.

      Delete
  2. Ah, it must be that time of year: equinoxes and season changes and suchlike stuff. So anyway, in a fit of nostalgia, I decided I wouldn't just toss some old reading out into the Street Library (and a big vote of thankx to Tones for having uncovered and discovered such) so I started in on something I last perused just less than 60 years ago: The Road To Wigan Pier. And therein, I encountered this:

    "The most dreadful thing about people like [the reptiles] is the way they say the same things over and over again. It gives you the feeling that they are not real people at all, but a kind of ghost forever rehearsing the same futile rigmarole."

    Well, Eric the Pinko could certainly throw a few well chosen words together, couldn't he.
    And so in his way could Guy Incognito: "Chris delete this it makes you sound like a very fragile snowflake."

    But to me, it isn't so much ghostly, especially coming from Dame Slap, but more it's crusaderish. Not that I personally have anything against crusades, you understand. They were, after all, equal opportunity undertakings of around 1000 years ago. So we have Richard the Lionheart's 3rd crusade, to liberate Jerusalem, it having been re-captured in a prior crusade by An-Nasir Salah ad-Din Yusuf ibn Ayyub (aka Saladin, history's most famous Kurd) after which he personally beheaded Reynald of Châtillon with his own hands.

    Saladin, after all, wasn't quite as likeably lovely as Rex Harrison portrayed him in a certain overblown Hollywood movie. Still, all things considered he was noticeably more civilised than either Richard, or my old mate Temujin:
    "Genghis and Saladin: the men who invented global terror"
    https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2015/07/genghis-and-saladin-men-who-invented-global-terror

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dorothy
    You are a breath of fresh air into my day. Your thoughts on the bloody clowns from Murdochracy are so true and what it tells me is that they have no ethics as journalists and should not be classed as such because truth is of no consequences to that crowd what we know from history is truth is of no consequences to Rupert either he is a scoundrel and should remain so after he is planted where ever that should be.

    ReplyDelete

Comments older than two days are moderated and there will be a delay in publishing them.