Monday, March 31, 2025

In which the pond struggles to find entertainment, when all that's to hand in the hive mind is the Caterist and the golfing Major ...

 

Might as well begin the week with an AI joke ...



How about a link too, so right away correspondents could leave to read Saahil Desai's piece for The Atlantic, My Day Inside America’s Most Hated Car, The Cybertruck is a 7,000-pound Rorschach test (archive link).

Spoiler alert, the opening as a teaser ...

On the first Sunday of spring, surrounded by row houses and magnolia trees, I came to a horrifying realization: My mom was right. I had been flipped off at least 17 times, called a “motherfucker” (in both English and Spanish), and a “fucking dork.” A woman in a blue sweater stared at me, sighed, and said, “You should be ashamed of yourself.” All of this because I was driving a Tesla Cybertruck.
I had told my mom about my plan to rent this thing and drive it around Washington, D.C., for a day—a journalistic experiment to understand what it’s like behind the wheel of America’s most hated car. “Wow. Be careful,” she texted back right away. Both of us had read the stories of Cybertrucks possibly being set on fire, bombed with a Molotov cocktail, and vandalized in every way imaginable. People have targeted the car—and Tesla as a whole—to protest Elon Musk’s role in Donald Trump’s administration. But out of sheer masochism, or stupidity, I still went ahead and spent a day driving one. As I idled with the windows down on a street in the Mount Pleasant neighborhood, a woman glared at me from her front porch: “Fuck you, and this truck, and Elon,” she yelled. “You drive a Nazi truck.” She slammed her front door shut, and then opened it again. “I hope someone blows your shit up.”

And even worse, the closer ...

...By 9 p.m., I’d had enough. I valeted at my hotel, with its “Tibetan Bowl Sound Healing” classes, and got a nervous look from the attendant. I can’t blame anyone who sees the car as the stainless-steel embodiment of the modern right. This week, a county sheriff in Ohio stood in front of a green Cybertruck and derided Tesla vandals as “little fat people that live in their mom’s basement and wear their mom’s pajamas.” But it is also a tragedy that the Cybertruck has become the most partisan car in existence—more so than the Prius, or the Hummer, or any kind of Subaru. The Cybertruck, an instantly meme-able and very weird car, could have helped America fall in love with EVs. Instead, it is doing the opposite. The revolt against Tesla is not slowing down, and in some cases people are outright getting rid of their cars. Is it really a win that Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona exchanged his all-electric Tesla sedan for a gas-guzzling SUV?
Then again, Republicans aren’t buying the Cybertruck en masse. It is too expensive and too weird. Buying any Tesla might be a way to own the libs, but the right has proved maddeningly resistant to going electric. “Your average MAGA Trump supporter isn’t going to go buy a Tesla,” McDonald, the EV analyst, said. Before the car shipped in November 2023, Musk predicted that Tesla would sell 250,000 a year. He hasn’t even sold one-fifth of that in total—and sales are falling. (Neither Tesla or Musk responded to a request for comment.)
A bumper sticker on the back of a Tesla says "anti-elon-tesla-club"
Musk made a lot of other promises that haven’t really panned out: The Cybertruck was supposed to debut at less than $40,000. The cheapest model currently available is double that. The vehicle, Musk said, would be “really tough, not fake tough.” Instead, its stainless-steel side panels have fallen off because Tesla used the wrong glue—and that was just the most recent of the car’s eight recalls. The Cybertruck was supposed to be able to haul “near infinite mass” and “serve briefly as a boat.” Just this month alone, one Cybertruck’s rear end snapped off in a test of its towing power, and another sank off the coast of Los Angeles while trying to offload a Jet Ski from the bed.
The Cybertruck, in that sense, is a perfect metaphor for Musk himself. The world’s richest man has a bad habit of promising one thing and delivering another. X was supposed to be the “everything app”; now it is a cesspool of white supremacy. DOGE was billed as an attempt to make the government more nimble and tech-savvy. Instead, the cuts have resulted in seniors struggling to get their Social Security checks. So far, Musk has only continued to get richer and more powerful while the rest of us have had to deal with the wreckage. Let that sink in, as he likes to say. The disaster of the Cybertruck is not that it’s ugly, or unconventional, or absurdly pointy. It’s that, for most people, the car just isn’t worth driving.

And that's it for entertainment for the day, because there's bugger all signs of life below ...

As usual, it was the venerable Meade who called out the pond's worries and woes for the next few weeks.

Where the the Meidas Touch routinely refers to "state media known as Fox", here we have anticipatory, lying in wait with a baseball bat, hopeful, helpful, persecutory wannaba "state media in waiting known as the lizard Oz" ... (not to mention all the rest of the Murdochian empire)... 



....and there's weeks of the propaganda war to come ...

This morning's digital edition of the lizard Oz was almost as impenetrable as a Tesla truck ...

Sure there was a truly grotesque, nausea-inducing gif style wrap-around as a distraction ... featuring animated Kafka-esque eyes ...



Deeply, deeply weird, and over on the extreme far right things were no better ...



What to make of this sort of splash? 

ENERGY ELECTION WARS
PM walks away from 2030 energy bill cut
Anthony Albanese’s energy transition has been rocked after he junked ALP-commissioned modelling underpinning Labor’s power bill reduction and emissions reduction targets.
Geoff Chambers and Greg Brown

Of course he's been rocked, he's going to be endlessly rocked ... that's what happens in a war zone, where everything is a reptile war ...

There might be a job for a Freudian as the reptiles grapple with their state media in waiting assignments. 

Poor old simpleton Simon (here no conflict of interest), had the tragic job of reporting ...

EXCLUSIVE
Newspoll: Labor takes early lead but voters mark down budget
Labor has begun the election campaign with a rise in support, despite voters ranking Jim Chalmers’ budget as the worst for the economy in a decade.
Simon Benson

... and then over on the extreme far right rubbing his hands and looking at falling clouds in imitation of "Ned's" Chicken Little routine ...

Coalition risks snatching defeat from jaws of victory
This was always going to be a contest between who voters considered to be the least unattractive of two unappealing options. Newspoll suggests Dutton is now at risk.
Simon Benson
Political Editor

What can the pond do with any of this? 

What are the alternatives? Culture war fodder from Dame Slap?

EXCLUSIVE
Climate, gender focus of PNG studies shift
An Australian taxpayer-backed scholarship for students from PNG is pushing applications to focus on ‘gender, climate and disability-related studies’ instead of agriculture, education, and health.
Janet Albrechtsen and Noah Yim

Oh Noah, you poor thing, the company you keep. 

Is it willing, or were you forced, made to take a long march through the institutions of the reptile hive mind? 

That way lies madness, or as the venerable Meade reminded the pond, Pellist miracles...




A book promo?! A fisher of gullible fools?!

For some strange reason, as well as reminding the pond of cheese on toast, the pond was reminded of the Highest falls survived without a parachute

The wiki (and Guiness) gave the honour to Vesna Vulović, who managed a 33,330 foot drop: Flight attendant from Serbia who was the sole survivor of an airplane bombing mid-air. Likely landed in part of fuselage in heavily wooded and snow-covered mountainside. Suffered many bone fractures.  

See also the Beeb's Five survivors of spectacular falls.

No miracle Everywhere it's the same, with news from the croweaters offering hope ...

EXCLUSIVE
‘I’ll call Dutton first’: independent MP puts cards on table
In a boost to the Coalition’s hopes of forming government in a hung parliament, Rebekha Sharkie says she will meet with Peter Dutton first if he can form a stable administration.
By David Penberthy

Rats in the ranks are lined up to be berated ...

Turnbull’s ‘security’ forum more about personal vendettas
Does Turnbull think an anti-AUKUS or anti-Trump spray will damage his old political foe, Peter Dutton? I can’t be sure, but I can say it’s irresponsible to play politics with the US alliance during an election.
Anthony Bergin

What to do? Nothing much. Suffer in silence, lie still and hope it will soon be over ...

All the pond can do is bunker down, hunker down with a pained grin, trot out the regulars with minimal comment, and wait until the fever passes ...

So it was on with the Caterist, back on his Monday perch, warbling his timeless tune ...




At least doing the opening splash as a screen cap featuring rats in the ranks meant the pond could cut to the chase ...

Anthony Albanese’s decision to launch his campaign in the Opposition Leader’s suburban Brisbane seat was hailed as a “bold opening salvo” by Guardian Australia.
More objective observers familiar with the Prime Minister’s character might describe it as hollow chest-thumping from a leader inclined to be too cute by half.
Malcolm Fraser wouldn’t have given a second glance at Gough Whitlam’s western Sydney seat of Werriwa a half-century ago.
The seat was still off-limits for the Liberal Party in 2013. Tony Abbott worked hard to win the neighbouring seat of Lindsay but knew better than to waste his time on Laurie Ferguson’s patch. Yet Werriwa was where Peter Dutton spent much of day three of the campaign, standing alongside Sam Kayal, the Arabic-speaking son of Lebanese migrants, who is representing the Liberals for the second time.
Labor’s Anne Stanley won comfortably three years ago, increasing her margin to 11.6 per cent. This time, however, she’s in strife. In the great inversion of Australian politics that began under John Howard, Werriwa’s moment has come.

Whaddya expect from the flood waters in quarries whisperer? 

Then for some bizarre reason the reptiles dragged in the onion muncher as an example to follow, Sky News host James Morrow says Tony Abbott was “incredibly effective” as opposition leader. Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has released the Coalition’s first ad ahead of the federal election on May 3. “Peter Dutton needs to urgently take a page out of Tony Abbott’s playbook,” Mr Morrow said.




Did it occur to the reptiles that the onion muncher was incredibly defective as a PM, and even punters with short memories would still be celebrating some of his knightly BBQ stoppers.

If he's the one to follow, if he's the heavily testicled budgie smuggling billy goat with the kick heads knob playbook, then the long absent lord help us all ...

But the pond had promised not to comment, just to let the flood waters in quarries whisperer ramble on ...

The loss of six blue-ribbon seats to the teals in 2022 was a reminder that the inversion works both ways. Robert Menzies’ former seat of Kooyong was once the kind of safe seat ambitious young Liberals would fight with bare knuckles to win. Even if the Liberals win the seat back from the EQ-challenged Monique Ryan in May, the words safe and Kooyong are unlikely to appear in the same sentence any time soon.
The big reversals in Labor’s class war began with Howard’s landslide in 1996, with wins in seats such as Lindsay, Hughes and Lowe in western Sydney and McEwen and McMillan in Victoria.
Boundary changes have muddied the waters, and fortunes have ebbed and flowed, but the long-term trend is unmistakeable. In 2013, David Coleman won the western Sydney seat of Banks for the Liberals for the first time in the Abbott landslide. He set up his electorate office a street away from the Revesby Workers Club with its giant hammer and sickle embedded in the wall. This time, the best Sportsbet will offer on Coleman is $1.05.
The same parsimonious odds apply to Melissa McIntosh in Lindsay. In the space of two terms, McIntosh has turned a once-bellwether seat into an impregnable Liberal stronghold.
Punters with an appetite for risk will find richer pickings in Bradfield on Sydney’s middle north shore, where Liberal frontbencher Paul Fletcher is hanging up his spurs. Fletcher retained his seat in the Abbott landslide with a margin of 30.8 per cent. Last time, he was lucky to hang on after a determined challenge from the political wing of the renewable energy industry, or teals as they’re known for short. On Sunday, Sportsbet was offering $1.75 on the Liberals’ Gisele Kapterian and $1.95 on Nicolette Boele, a Killara High School graduate, mum of two and climate finance professional from teal central casting. As the NSW Office of Responsible Gambling is constantly reminding us: is this a bet you really want to place?
That Dutton has a chance of becoming prime minister three years after a cataclysmic defeat boils down to three things: shoddy government, disciplined opposition and a household recession.

Time to showcase a candidate, Sam Kayal is the Liberal candidate for Werriwa. Picture: Jason Edwards




That set the Caterist off. 

It turns out - who knew? - that he's a tragic figure, regularly up at 4 am to eat his lump of tar, confiscated from the nearby street, before heading off to put in 24 hours at coal mine, a ritual he performs each day. 

What would the well-off riff raff know of his suffering, and his keening and his howls and whines of despair?

The recession is hardly apparent at Harris Farm Markets in Willoughby’s High Street, in Bradfield, where the median family weekly income was $3150 in the 2021 census. Mortgage stress? Not much. In these old-money, rugger-bugger suburbs, 36 per cent own their homes outright. Fuel prices? Only 25 per cent drive to work and 52 per cent of Bradfield’s workforce worked from home at the time of the 2021 census. Carnes Hill Marketplace, 40 minutes’ drive west of the Sydney CBD, is a better place to assess the human cost of 14 mortgage rate rises and rampant energy prices.
The shopping trolleys emerging from Woolworths tell the story: heavy on bakery and value-pack sausages, light on salami and prosciutto. Almost no one is lingering for an iced chai latte at Gloria Jean’s.
Meanwhile, Kayal has been finding plenty of takers for his campaign leaflet. Across the first days of the campaign, a steady stream of locals stop to share their thoughts on Albanese and Labor. None could be described as remotely complimentary.
Why would they be? Werriwa is the kind of place people move to in the hope of getting a toehold in the housing market, to send their children to affordable non-government schools and find work in the surrounding industries, which these days are dominated by warehousing and logistics.
Fuel prices matter for business owners and workers, half of whom rely on a car or truck to get to work. Dutton’s promise to cut fuel excise by 25.4 per cent was precisely calibrated for seats such as this.
The deal breaker, however, is housing. In the past decade, families have moved to suburbs such as Austral, rezoned from rural to urban development in 2013, as part of the NSW government’s South West Growth Area.

Actually the pond has gone off Harris Farms at Broadway, and much prefers the offerings of Panetta Mercato in Marrickville. 

Oops, that puts the pond in prime Albo turf, Anthony Albanese on the campaign trail with Alicia Payne and Katy Gallagher. Picture: Jason Edwards




And then with pursed lip, and tongue firmly in cheek, it was time for the last of the ramble from the floodwaters in quarries whisperer ...

Austral didn’t exist for census purposes in 2016. By 2021, however, it had a population of 6847, mainly families, and an average age of 31. Fifty per cent had taken out mortgages, with average monthly repayments of $2535. After three years of Labor, the average monthly repayments would now be close to $4000. The median family weekly income, $2224 in 2024, has not caught up.
The number of cars in the driveway has barely changed, not for display but out of necessity; 65 per cent of homes had more than one. Since this is a thoroughly aspirational suburb, half of children go to non-government schools. These families have invested well. Austral will be prime real estate once the Western Sydney Airport precinct is completed.
In the meantime, they have to deal with the inconveniences that come with a new suburb: no public transport, the nearest children’s park is several kilometres away and the congestion on 15th Avenue means it can add 40 minutes to the daily commute.
It doesn’t take much imagination to understand why there’s a queue seven cars long for the bowsers at Costco in nearby Casula, where E10 cost $1.66 – 40c cheaper than the Edgecliff BP. Just 45km west of the Sydney CBD feels like a completely different planet.
The iron law at this election is that where competition for cheap fuel is most intense, Dutton’s stocks increase. At least a half-dozen NSW and Victorian seats, which the Coalition has never held before, are now in play.
The odds are that Dutton will fall short of the 22-seat target he needs to form a majority government. Win or lose, however, 2025 is shaping up to be a strategic triumph, re-establishing a new Liberal heartland among the people Labor forgot.
Nick Cater is a senior fellow at the Menzies Research Centre.

Say what? The Caterist has gone all Black Knight, and is calling it a "strategic triumph", whatever happens, win or lose, legless, or sans arms, or headless ...

Usually at this point the pond would try to tippy toe outside the hive mind and drag in some alternative entertainment, but this day didn't have the heart ...

The pond has Tesla'd for its fun, and now can immortal Rowe'd ...




And that's it, though it's probably not just winter that's a Doug Ashdown lyric, it's likely spring, summer and fall too...Minnesota officials seek answers after Ice detains graduate student.

So close to full-blown fascism.

And now back to the reptiles ...

It was good of the Major to take time off from his golf, even if it meant the pond would waste five minutes of precious life indulging him in his bog standard ranting about renewables and the urgent need to nuke the country to save the planet ...

Chris Bowen could be Peter Dutton’s best asset at May 3 election, If it appears Chris Bowen is keeping a low profile ahead of May 3, it might just be because he knows something most environment writers have not yet reported.

Naturally a villain had to start off proceedings, Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen. Picture: Martin Ollman




How many bogeys must the pond endure?

If it appears Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen is keeping a low profile ahead of the May 3 election, it might just be because he knows something most environment writers have not yet reported.
Bowen has claimed in interviews since Labor’s 2022 election that wind and solar are the cheapest forms of energy.
But this is only true in that the marginal cost of wind and solar at peak output times is zero. It says nothing about the actual cost of system-wide electricity production.
The International Energy Agency in January compared electricity prices in countries with different levels of renewables: those with the most wind and solar also have the highest electricity prices.
This column has for years reported on manufacturers, especially car makers, leaving Germany and the UK for cheaper power in the US and China.
The UK under the previous Tory government was worse than Germany. UK energy prices adjusted for inflation are up 300 per cent between 2003 and 2023.
The latest IEA comparison confirms what Australia’s CSIRO, various green energy bodies and Bowen have denied: because of the need for ageing fossil fuel assets to be retained as backup, renewables actually turn out to be the most expensive form of power when the entire system cost is considered.

Relax, the hot link in that text wasn't a link to anything relevant, it was to a lizard Oz editorial titled Energy shock treatment keeps coming for Chris Bowen, Ideological fascination has been allowed to derail common sense...

...because that's how it works in the hive mind. 

Once you've booked into the hive mind hotel, you can never leave.

And don't expect any relevant links or actual graphs ... that's not how it works in the hive mind ...

An IEA graph charting prices per kilowatt hour versus percentage of renewables in a country’s system shows those countries approaching 40 per cent renewables and more have by far the highest prices. These include the Netherlands, the UK, Spain, Germany, Denmark and Greece.
Green energy evangelists said batteries would provide backup and neither old fossil fuel plants nor new gas peakers would be needed. Most environment writers won’t admit batteries are for harmonisation of the grid and short-term (a few minutes) backup only.
Copenhagen Consensus Centre director Bjorn Lomborg wrote in the UK Daily Telegraph on January 25 that to provide sufficient backup for extended periods of low sun and wind, total UK system storage would need to be 10,000 times larger than it is now at a cost of £15 trillion ($31 trillion) – or five times the UK’s average annual GDP.
Citing the IEA, Lomborg wrote: “The average electricity cost with little or no solar or wind power is about 10 pence a kilowatt hour. For every 10 percentage points of additional solar and wind, the cost increases by more than 4p.”

There's the trouble in a nutshell, or more simply a nut. 

The Major is a Bjorn-again one believer, and the only relief the pond could find was in the caption, Chinese President Xi Jinping’s country is buying in coal so it can build wind and solar infrastructure to expert. Picture: Getty Images




"To expert"? So and thus, and so it goes, with the Major an export in his own mind...

Environment writers like to talk about China’s commitment to renewables but seldom mention most of China’s increasing use of coal is to make wind and solar infrastructure to export to the West.
A peer-reviewed study in Germany and Texas suggests wind power with storage backup could be 12 times more expensive than coal.
Most environment writers like to quote from the many new green news websites that have sprung up globally. One this column uses is Climate Action Tracker.
The top six global emitters – China, the US, India, the EU, Russia and Japan – are responsible for more than 60 per cent of emissions. Climate Action Tracker finds most are not on course to meet their targets.
While the Nine newspapers and Guardian Australia correctly claim China is making rapid progress on green energy, it has still not reached peak coal, and Climate Action Tracker on September 17 rated its overall net zero efforts “highly insufficient”.
Ditto India. Russia was rated “critically insufficient”.
The US rated “insufficient”, as did the EU and Japan.
This should set off alarm bells in the minds of Australian voters only days after the federal budget extended more power price handouts to consumers. After all, Bowen says we are on track for 82 per cent renewables by 2030.
The UK sits at 42 per cent and Germany at 62 per cent. Both face ruinous power bills to households who watch on while global CO2 emissions continue to rise. This is why Labor is subsidising household bills.
Renewables sit at 20 per cent of electricity supply in the US, where inflation-adjusted power prices have been stable since 2003.

Inevitably there was a snap of the Major's hero, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton wants an election about power prices. Picture: Lyndon Mechielsen




At least that avoided dragging up memories of the onion muncher ...

China hopes to hit 30 per cent wind and solar by the end of 2025. Despite media claims it has passed 50 per cent renewables, that number included traditional hydro power generation, 13 per cent of system output.
So what’s the real position globally?
The IEA says electricity demand is soaring across the planet as poor countries flock towards airconditioning and new technologies led by artificial intelligence and big data centres lift electricity demand in China and the West.
And while fossil fuel use is expected to plateau in 2027, the IEA says coal will continue to be used in an effort to increase electricity production globally.
Gas, recovering from the Ukraine war shock, will increasingly be relied on to stabilise renewables at times of low solar and wind production. LNG output rose 2.5 per cent in 2024 and is expected to rise 5 per cent this year.

Relax, the hot link in that text is to a lizard Oz editorial titled Energy shock treatment keeps coming for Chris Bowen, Ideological fascination has been allowed to derail common sense

Think you vaguely remember that being mentioned before? 

Relax, that's how it works in the hive mind, endless repetition, rote learning of misinformation, and an insistence no one strays outside the hive.

That's the why and the how, the beginning and the end, the Alpha and Omega, of the Major rabbiting on in his usual way ...

Global coal use peaked at 8.77 billion tonnes in 2024 and is expected to top out at 8.87 billion tonnes in 2027 after rising 1.2 billion tonnes since 2020, most of that in China.
A third of all coal burned worldwide is now used in China’s electricity sector. Coal use is declining in advanced Western countries.
While global CO2 emissions rose 1 per cent last year and 1.4 per cent in 2023 the IEA expects emissions to flatten out through to 2027 as more renewables come on stream around the world, and particularly in China.
This flattening comes in the context of average annual global electricity production rising by 3.9 per cent. So the emissions intensity of electricity production is falling.
The IEA forecasts a continued ramping up globally of nuclear plant construction and says nuclear is the second-largest source of low emissions electricity worldwide, just behind hydro power but ahead of wind and solar.
It says the world’s fleet of 420 reactors will reach record output this calendar year and notes 63 new reactors are under construction.
The IEA electricity report shows the world will need all its generation sources to meet what is calls “the age of electricity”.
“Over the next three years global electricity consumption is forecast to rise by an unprecedented 3500TWh. This corresponds to adding more than … a Japan … each year.”
Demand will be driven by China, India and Southeast Asia.
Despite the rapid expansion of wind, solar, hydro and nuclear, fossil fuels still account for 80 per cent of power generation worldwide.
Australia’s determination to reach 82 per cent renewables by 2030, and the Western world’s commitment to net zero by 2050, may reduce CO2 emissions from what they would otherwise have been.
But fossil fuel emissions will continue as poorer countries use coal and gas they know is cheap to push for economic development.
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s focus on petrol excise and gas in his budget reply last Thursday suggests the Coalition wants an election about power prices. Bowen could prove to be Dutton’s best asset.

That's it, that's all he wrote. 

Oh wait, the pond can't let struggling punters who made it to the very bitter end go home without a kewpie doll, like the heroic struggling cane cutters they are to have achieved the feat ...

This just in from John Hanscombe in The Echnida, having grand fun with the beefy boofhead from down Goulburn way ... (you have to subscribe to get the email) ...

It will be a struggle but they'll do their best not to mention the T word. That's because in a tight election fight, unwanted attention on it could be poison for the Coalition. Just like the N word - nuclear - the less said the better.
No, the T word is not Trump. It's Taylor, Angus Taylor, the man who would be treasurer.
Also, the man Labor has made a sport of taunting almost every question time, goading him to get up on his feet to ask a question of his opposite number just so Jim Chalmers can knock him off them again.
Taylor, the bloke who, under hard questioning, bears the embarrassed expression of someone holding up the ATM queue because he can't for the life of him remember his own PIN.
The bloke even Sky News called out last year for what it called his "litany of gaffes", among them confusing the monthly inflation rate with the annual rate, claiming the price of Vegemite had gone up 8 per cent in a month when it had gone up by that much over a year and, an absolute howler, saying the opposition had always supported the government's energy bill relief.
The bloke who, in July 2022, found himself incapable of addressing Deputy Speaker Sharon Claydon as anything other than "Mr Speaker". It wasn't a one-off slip of the tongue. He did it 32 times in his 10-minute ramble. We know Angus can't think on his feet but the suspicion is he also struggles when sitting down.
That's why Jim Chalmers is desperate for Taylor to debate him on the economy. The Treasurer's put the offer out there but it's been rebuffed. That's a pity for us, the voters, who'd like some kind of assurance the fellow who would be treasurer can remember where he parked the Range Rover, can count and is fit to hold the nation's purse strings.
Taylor vs Chalmers would be far more entertaining and instructive than Albanese vs Dutton, who've been waging a colourless Punch & Judy show for three years. But it won't happen. When you think you're on the cusp of power, as Peter Dutton does, the last thing you want is Angus inserting his RMs into his own mouth. Safer to leave him in his own electorate, promising millions for new pavilions at local sports grounds - if the Coalition wins government, that is...

The pond treasured a few of those lies ...

We know Angus can't think on his feet but the suspicion is he also struggles when sitting down.

As for that prime beefy boofhead, Angus on the hoof, promising new pavilions, that's a relief, Mr Hanscombe.

For a minute the pond thought he might be promising millions for new windmills, for the endless tilting thereat, and thereon, on the grounds that it's a sport for the mindlessly stupid...

And so to end with Herbert, wondering if there might be an alternative to all this nonsense...




Sunday, March 30, 2025

In which the pond does its best to avoid a Sunday meditating with prattling Polonius and the man who routinely bothers dogs with rhetorical questions ...

 

Gone.

Gone the chance to use the reptiles in the lizard Oz to segue to stories and snaps that amused the pond. 

Like the snap that started Emma Brockes piece in the Graudian, Digested week: I agree with Jeremy Clarkson – my enemy’s enemy is still kind of a jerk



What a ripper, and now the pond can make a natural jump to a 'toon, without any reptile help ...




Gone the chance to bear witness to the Cantaloupe Caligula shaking down law firms in best Mafia don style, or trying to shake down Canada - elbows up! - or trying to acquire Greenland by any means...

Best just cut straight to the chase of a good Hydeing in So many souvenirs for JD Vance to take home from Greenland: oil, gas, minerals – and that’s just the start

There was much to delight ...

Anyway: Greenland. Like I say, the trip has evolved this week both in style and substance. Originally, it was announced that the second lady was going to take one of her sons, immerse herself in various local events – she’s apparently simply fascinated by Greenland’s culture – and attend the famous Avannaata Qimussersua dog sled race. No more. Now, it’s her husband instead of her son, and the Vances are only going to a military facility. This is a little bit like announcing you’re travelling to Kyoto to see the blossoms, then “recalibrating” your trip so that all you’ll actually be taking in is a tour of the storage facility where they keep the most boring documents from the signing of the 1997 climate protocol. Extremely important, no doubt – and extremely, extremely boring. Or as the White House has chosen to characterise this shift in emphasis: “The Second Lady is proud to visit the Pituffik Space Base with her husband to learn more about Arctic security and the great work of the Space Base.” It is unclear at time of writing if Pituffik has spa facilities. Presumably it’s got something of a year-round après-ski vibe.

And Vlad the sociopath scored a mention ...

Meanwhile, a series of proxies are emerging to push America’s case – or, in the case of Vladimir Putin, to not argue with it in a way that is tantamount to cheerleading. “In short, America’s plans in relation to Greenland are serious,” the Russian president observed this week. “These plans have deep historical roots. And it’s clear that the US will continue to systematically pursue its geo-strategic, military-political and economic interests in the Аrctic.” On Friday morning, Stephen Moore – a former Trump economic adviser-turned-Heritage Foundation wingnut – explained cheerfully to the BBC that the Greenlanders were “the people who would benefit the most from this … let’s call it a sale, or acquisition.” Let’s not, but go on. “They could, overnight, turn into millionaires.” This somehow reminds me of that old statistic suggesting that instead of going to an expensive war to protect them, the British government could instead have just made every Falkland Islander a millionaire to soften the unwanted blow of having been taken over by Argentina. After all, what else do people want in life, except for money?
“There could be trillions of dollars’ worth of minerals and oil and gas and other types of … precious minerals that could be of value to the United States,” speculated Moore, adding, almost by way of an afterthought about the Greenlanders, that there’s “essentially a treasure chest right below their feet”. Mm. The trouble with the nakedly rapacious hawks of Trumpworld putting it that way, of course, is that it’s only a very short hop to seeing the Greenland people as the obstacle. If only they, and their feet, could just be dug through, then the treasure chest could be rightfully – or wrongfully – claimed.

There was a link to the Beeb, Rosenberg: Putin nods to Trump plans to seize Greenland

In Murmansk, the largest city north of the Arctic circle, President Vladimir Putin vowed to "strengthen Russia's global leadership in the Arctic", while warning that "geopolitical competition in the region" was intensifying.
The first example he gave was Donald Trump's idea to acquire Greenland.
But from the Kremlin leader there was no criticism of his US counterpart.
And that's telling, as the White House and the Kremlin try to rebuild relations.
"In short, America's plans in relation to Greenland are serious," President Putin said in an address to Russia's Arctic Forum in Murmansk.
"These plans have deep historical roots. And it's clear that the US will continue to systematically pursue its geo-strategic, military-political and economic interests in the Аrctic.
"As for Greenland this is a matter for two specific countries. It has nothing to do with us."
So said the president who had launched a full-scale invasion of a sovereign neighbouring country and claims to have annexed whole swathes of Ukraine.
When Joe Biden was in the White House, Moscow and Washington were vocal in their criticism of one another.
How things have changed.

But the pond can only tootle so long before returning to the lizard Oz tracks.

On the other hand, the pond has refused to run on certain hive mind tracks, such as Dame Slap rabbiting on in her inimitable way, Upend the curriculum, upend our legal system, The project to ‘indigenise’ law school curriculums will mean upending the curriculum from what the law is to what activists think it should be.

Aka the blonde fear of the black?

Nope, not tempted, though there's a 'toon at the very bottom of this outing that deals with the syndrome.

With Dame Slap a briar patch that didn't tempt the pond, again the pond was left with interminable boredom, starting with prattling Polonius, Why it’s in Coalition’s best interests to preference Labor, If the Liberals and the Nationals want to demonstrate that they put Australia first then it makes sense to put the Greens last at every election.

It was, to be fair, rated only a four minute read, and it began with a snap, Reports from the Sydney electorate indicate Tanya Plibersek will pay a political price for supporting the government’s legislation that will allow the salmon industry to continue farming at Macquarie Harbour. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman



The pond happens, by a quirk, to be in Tanya's electorate, alongside Lord Howe islanders, and wasn't just about the salmon industry, but the wider implications. Per The Conversation ...A bill introduced to parliament this week, if passed, would limit the government’s power to reconsider certain environment approvals when an activity is harming the environment.

Tanya has in the past done things that would have benefited from reconsideration ...

Boggabri Coal Mine, Caval Ridge Mine, Lake Vermont Coal Mine.Three coal mines avoid reconsideration of environmental impacts

Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek has given an early Christmas present to coal companies by refusing to reconsider the impacts of three mine expansions.

She was an approval machine, Tanya Plibersk approves three coalmine expansions in move criticised as 'the opposite of climate action'.

Obvious questions were asked: Expanding coal mines - and reaching net zero? Tanya Plibersek seems to believe both is possible.

She also seems to think it's possible to forget all this ... and perhaps she's not worried that she's been given an (albeit very limited Aldi style warranty) Polonial blessing ...

Believe it or not, there was some good news from the final sitting week of parliament before the May 2025 election. The Coalition supported changes to the Albanese government’s Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment bill in the House of Representatives and the Senate that will allow the salmon industry to continue farming at Macquarie Harbour in Tasmania, in the short term at least.
The former does not matter much. After all, Labor has a majority, albeit a narrow one, in the house. The seven so-called teal independents – all of whom won seats from the Liberal Party – get great media coverage on the ABC. But they have no legislative clout. Unlike the Greens and independents in the Senate, where the government does not have a majority.
The EPBC legislation is complicated but it essentially reduces the authority of the environment minister to review previous environmental decisions if they have been in existence for five years. This curtails Tanya Plibersek’s ability to reconsider additional salmon farming in Macquarie Harbour.
It so happens the closest main town to Macquarie Harbour on Tasmania’s rugged west coast is Strahan. It is in the seat of Braddon, held by the Liberals. Labor’s Tasmanian focus in the election is to win Braddon and retain Franklin, where an independent candidate is opposed to the salmon industry in its current form.
The EPBC bill became an act when it passed the Senate by 30 to 14 votes. The decision by the Coalition to support the legislation meant it would neither be defeated nor amended by the Greens plus some independents and minor party senators. As it turned out, amendments moved by the Greens and the Coalition were defeated. However, since Liberal and Nationals senators broadly supported the legislation, it succeeded.
Now attention focuses on the Labor seat of Sydney, held by Plibersek. At the 2022 election she won 66.7 per cent of the two-candidate-preferred vote. Plibersek won an absolute majority in her own right of 50.8 per cent. There followed the Greens on 23 per cent and the Liberals on 19.7 per cent.
Reports from the Sydney electorate indicate Plibersek will pay a political price for supporting the government’s legislation. Under Labor’s rules, if a Labor parliamentarian crosses the floor he or she will be the subject of automatic suspension, at the least. If Plibersek publicly opposed the legislation, she would have had to resign from the ministry and go to the backbench. However, it is not evident how the environmental cause would have benefited from such an act of symbolic politics.
The Australia Institute, an avowedly leftist Canberra-based think tank whose leaders get ready access to the taxpayer-funded public broadcaster, has commissioned polling in Sydney. It suggests 61 per cent of voters in Plibersek’s seat support removing salmon farms from Macquarie Harbour if this is necessary to save the endangered Maugean skate.
The polling by uComms also indicates 65 per cent of Plibersek’s Labor base hold this view. In other words, there is evidence that Labor support in the Sydney electorate is dropping and there is some risk Plibersek could lose her seat to the Greens. There is a clear way that this could be prevented.
In June 2024, Peter Dutton told The Australian it was Liberal Party policy to “put the Greens last” at the next election. It is understood Dutton’s position would change only if, say, there was a neo-Nazi candidate running for election.

Ah, a neo-Nazi. 

The pond must take its segues where it finds them. 

The pond did enjoy Timothy W. Ryback's piece in The Atlantic, What the Press Got Wrong About Hitler, Journalists accurately reported that the führer was a “Little Man” whom the whole world was laughing at. It didn’t matter.(archive link)

...Although Hitler’s political struggles, and the general perception of him as a figure of ridicule, almost led him to suicide in late 1932, he was well accustomed to overcoming mockery. It fueled his ambition. Not long ago, while researching my most recent book, I listened to an audio recording Hitler had produced in the summer of 1932, in advance of the Reichstag elections, part of his effort to reach beyond the audience who read the critical mainstream press. The two-disc set is titled “Hitler’s Appeal to the Nation” and is emblazoned with a swastika that spins at 78 rpm. The recording was intended to be played at rallies across the country, and sold in bookstores, music shops, and newspaper kiosks for 1.6 reichsmarks (about $8 today). Hitler speaks in a notably measured tone—no ranting, no raving, no “Sieg heil!” choruses in the background. Still, despite the moderated tone, his seething, grievance-laden political message and his simmering mendacity penetrate through the hissing and crackling recording of the eight-and-a-half-minute address.
“Thirteen years ago we National Socialists were derided and disdained by our opponents,” Hitler says. “No one is laughing now.”

Yep, no one's laughing now, unless they happen to be a prize loon, or it's an ironic Treasure of Sierra Madre laugh ...



Sorry, the pond needs a 'toon fix to go on ... especially when the reptiles attempt their own AV distraction for Polonius, The Senator held up the fish in protest of proposed laws that would protect salmon farming in Tasmania’s Macquarie Harbour.



Sheesh, what are they doing to Polonius? 

When Jack the Insider ran the yarn, the reptiles gave him a handsome fishy gif, with little fishes falling through the air ...



Poor Polonial watch doggie, always being stiffed, always being ignored by the ABC and literary festival ...

Now, neither Dutton nor Albanese controls the respective Liberal and Labor party organisations. In fact, Dutton has less influence than Albanese since Labor has a national organisational structure that is more dominant than its Liberal Party equivalent. Moreover, Albanese excels in party organisational matters, including the art of getting the numbers.
A decision by the NSW division of the Liberal Party to preference Plibersek ahead of the Greens almost certainly would entail that Labor holds Sydney. Since the Liberals have no hope of winning this inner-city seat there is no downside. Whether Liberal voters like Plibersek or not, she represents a more moderate approach to politics than the Greens.
It should not be forgotten that radical Greens leader Adam Bandt won – on Liberal preferences – the traditional Labor seat of Melbourne in September 2010 following Labor frontbencher Lindsay Tanner’s retirement from politics. Maybe this seemed like a good idea at the time to the Victorian division of the Liberals Party. But it was counter-productive, since Melbourne, like Sydney, is never likely to be won by the Liberals.
A quick glance at the Greens website reveals this message: “Our pledge to you. The Greens will never use our numbers to support a Dutton Liberal government.” For his part, Dutton has stated that the Greens are an anti-Semitic party and described Bandt as a “radical … unworthy of public office”.
Dutton has called on Labor to put the Greens last on their how-to-vote cards. Labor and the Greens are political enemies. Even so, Labor is unlikely to favour the Coalition over the Greens. No problem for the Coalition really. Since such a preference swap would give legitimacy to Dutton’s claim that a vote for Labor is a vote for the Greens.
If the Liberals and the Nationals want to demonstrate that they put Australia first then it makes sense to put the Greens last at every election. Even if the Coalition does not win the 2025 election, it would benefit politically in the long term by supporting Labor legislation rather than lining up with the Greens and the Green-like teals in Canberra.
The events of this week in the parliament with respect to the EPBC Act are a positive move. Let’s hope they are not a one-off.

Bonus from reading Polonius? 

Why not give Tanya a scare? Isn't that what preference-enabled voting is all about?

As for the Liberals, it seems that they like to talk amongst themselves...



Isn't that Facebook innovation also called doing a beefy boofhead from down Goulburn way?

And now for something different ...



And that was a way to cue in the lizard Oz editorialist, with a brief detour into Getting airborne with defence, After decades of bipartisan neglect of the national defence, Peter Dutton’s budget reply speech was as refreshing as it was relevant.

It's just a two minute delay before getting on to the dog botherer, and the pond will seize any refreshing excuse, at least if you think car rental deodorant refreshes the vinyl smell ...

After decades of bipartisan neglect of the national defence, Peter Dutton’s budget reply speech was as refreshing as it was relevant. The problem for an incoming Coalition minister would be how the Australian Defence Force could have its equipment cake and eat it too. The Opposition Leader promised to invest so Australia could “deter aggression and maintain peace”. He is airborne already, previously promising $3bn to buy a fourth squadron of F-35 joint strike fighters to add to the 75 now in service.
RAAF Air Vice-Marshal Nicholas Hogan welcomes the possibility of 28 more F-35s, perhaps because the RAAF expected them until they were cancelled by the Albanese government. The fighter, when equipped with on-order air-to-sea capable missiles, will be essential to our maritime defence – certainly whenever the navy’s resupply ships are out of service with mechanical faults, as they are now.

Um, if the USA provides operational support ... and we know about that ...



Another win for Vlad the sociopath.

The lizard Oz editorialist then wandered down another path ...

But hi-tech, low-cost kit the F-35 is not, and it certainly does not deliver on Mr Dutton’s other promise “to energise our domestic defence industry” and “re-tool the ADF with asymmetric capabilities to deter a larger adversary”. This makes a case for the Ghost Bat, an uncrewed aircraft designed and test-flown in Australia by the RAAF and partner Boeing. Whether it will be armed – indeed, whether the RAAF will deploy it at all – appears undecided, but its purpose is to fly combat missions as a lower-cost force-multiplier that preserves the air force’s most valuable asset, aircrew. The air force must pick the drone that does the most for the least cost and can enter service in the quickest production time, but the Ghost Bat is an obvious example of how to meet Mr Dutton’s brief for more of Australia’s defence materiel to be made in Australia.
Critics of the cost of such an expansion say, variously, it can’t be done or need not be done. The response to the first claim is that we need to learn how and learn now. There is a bipartisan commitment to start work on a nuclear-powered submarine in Adelaide this decade. Defence industries need the practice in the immensely complex planning and training programs that will require. As to the second claim, any argument that Australia faces no threat was answered in February by a Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy squadron circumnavigating Australia. It was a projection of power intended to intimidate. And the idea that Ukraine’s heroic defence demonstrates wars can be fought by off-the-shelf drones does not apply – close-order infantry fighting on the steppes and short-range air raids are nothing like the vast distances of the Pacific. The US gets this, announcing a new fighter aircraft program, the piloted F-47, which will work with but not be replaced by drones.
There is now no low-cost exclusive AI option to expensive, human-crewed aircraft and submarines. But, as the Ghost Bat could show, affordable AI could increase their firepower. Australia’s strategic environment is transformed and we no longer can assume that we are free of threat for years to come. This means we need to arm up or be willing to give up. The more of our defence that can be made efficiently in Australia, the better. 

Says an American owned firm, owned by the man and his family consortium who own Faux Noise ... and we all know what that has produced ...




If that's security and defence, might as well surrender now...

And so inevitably, reluctantly to the dog botherer, purporting to just ask questions ...




As usual, the header was meta-ironic ... 

Just give it to us straight, ministers – why should you get back into office?  Across the next five weeks voters will be looking for answers but they are unlikely to get them without the right questions. So, I thought it might be worth listing some crucial queries for the government.

With that mysterious injunction ...

This article contains features which are only available in the web version Take me there

Here's a question. Is he going to list some crucial queries for the opposition and for the Queensland plod? (No, the pond isn't Frankie Howerd or Kenny Everett and isn't going to do a queries routine)

No doubt we'll see, but the pond has its doubts. This is much more the dog botherer's turf ...

When Jim Chalmers was asked about the nation’s soon-to-be $1 trillion debt on the morning after the budget, he responded with a howler.
“First of all,” he told Sally Sara on ABC Radio National, “gross debt this year is $177bn lower than when we came to office.”
I almost choked on my Weeties. The government’s own budget papers demonstrate this simply was not true. At the end of June 2022 debt stood at $895bn and the budget tells us the figure will be at least $940bn in June 2025, before topping $1 trillion in 2026.
So I kept listening, eagerly awaiting the next question to Chalmers: “Treasurer, that is simply not true, your own budget papers show gross debt has swollen by at least $45bn since you took office and will increase by more than $80bn in the coming year, so shouldn’t you be up-front and honest with voters about the debt burden?”

He eats Weeties? 

Each week the reptiles offer up way too much information, together with snaps of villains... When Jim Chalmers was asked about the nation’s soon-to-be $1 trillion debt on the morning after the budget, he responded with a howler.. Picture: NewsWire/Martin Ollman



It didn't take long for the dog botherer to drag in his favourite topic, denying that he was a climate science denialist ...

Sadly, that question did not come – the falsehood stood unchallenged – as Sara moved on to other topics.
Such are the frustrations of our political debate. Across the next five weeks voters will be looking for answers but they are unlikely to get them without the right questions. So, I thought it might be worth listing some crucial queries for the government.
These are the questions I would like Chalmers, Anthony Albanese, Chris Bowen, Penny Wong and others to answer during the three dozen campaign days ahead.
Have living standards improved or fallen after three years of Albanese Labor? A $275 annual cut in electricity bills was promised, along with reduced mort­gages and a lower cost of living, but what materialised?
If the lowest personal income tax rate is too high, why was it not lowered when the stage three tax cuts were adjusted? Why is it not being lowered in July 2025 rather than 2026?
Why put a heavy burden on taxpayers and the private sector with climate and energy policies designed to reduce carbon emissions when there can be no environmental benefit because global emissions continue to rise? Why deliberately create economic pain when there is no climate gain?
If a renewables-plus-storage electricity grid is cheap and reliable, why does it require subsidies and grants? If a renewables-plus-storage model is affordable and plausible, why has no modern economy implemented such a model and why has no other developed economy even attempted to make the switch?
If the expensive transition to renewables (including generation, transmission, storage and firming) has pushed electricity prices upwards, how can more of the same deliver the opposite outcome?
Why should regional and coastal communities be forced to put up with wind farms, solar factories, offshore turbines and transmission projects to satisfy the impractical green ideals of Greens and teal voters in city seats?
If nuclear energy is too expensive, why do 50 countries use it and why have 31 nations committed to triple their nuclear energy output by 2050? Given the International Energy Agency claims that half of the emissions reductions to get to net zero will have to come from technology not yet in commercial use, which technologies will Australia employ to get to net zero?
The IEA also declares nuclear energy is essential to achieve net zero, so how can Australia reach that goal without nuclear?

The pond has its own question. 

Why should Australia attempt to achieve net zero, when each week, one reptile or another, including the dog botherer, is busy explaining that (a) climate science is a hoax, a religious cult, only believed by zealots and (b) net zero is unachievable, a mirage, a phantasm, a delusion, a waste of time and money, and (c) when the planet is totally and comprehensively fucked, we can all get along perfectly well in our fully prepped bunkers?

Why should we nuke the country to save the planet when the planet doesn't need saving, it needs dinkum clean virginal Oz coal ...

The reptiles helped the dog botherer with a snap of the nuke cult, If the United Arab Emirates can build and commission four 1400MW nuclear power plants in little more than a decade, why is it beyond us? Picture: AFP



The pond feels like the nuke debate has been done to death, what with the chances of SMRs littering the country by 2035 as remote as the dog botherer understanding and accepting climate science, so please allow the pond to take a break with a 'toon, vaguely relevant to the dog botherer's double speak questions, done with forked tongue ...



As a rhetorical device, this dog botherer carry on quickly began to wear thin ...

How much government money has already been spent on green hydrogen projects? With at least 10 major green hydrogen projects scrapped, despite the promise of massive government subsidies, should Labor admit its “green hydrogen revolution” will not be happening?
Given the 2024 net immigration target was 260,000 and it resulted in net migration of 335,000, how many people will migrate here under the 2025 260,000 target?
If the federal government does not have the legal authority to deport or detain dangerous criminal non-citizens, what will it do to gain such powers?
Why did the government threaten to deport an American influencer who picked up a baby wombat when it has failed to deport Islamist hate preachers and it issued 3000 tourist visas to people from Gaza without thorough security checks?
If corporate tax rates are higher in Australia compared with other nations, why would companies choose to invest here? If taxes are higher here, should we expect corporations to repatriate profits elsewhere?
If Indigenous cultural heritage claims can be used to block developments, should we ensure there are effective ways to investigate and verify those claims? If taxpayers fund governments to make decisions about projects, including after environmental and Indigenous assessments, why are taxpayers also forced to pay for activists at the Environmental Defenders Office that seek to overturn or block those decisions?
What is the point of having official Indigenous heritage bodies if their views on projects are pushed aside in favour of less representative groups? Have Indigenous cultural heritage claims gone too far?

Spoken like a cult member ...



On and on he went ...

If we allow government debt to reach $1 trillion, are we not foisting an unfair tax burden on to our children and their children? Is it responsible to live beyond our means now and leave future generations to pay for it?
Has government become too large, raising and spending too much money, running too many organisations and intruding on too many aspects of our lives? Is the National Disability Insurance Scheme sustainable or is it spending too much money with too little accountability?
Do we have the requisite defence equipment and personnel to defend our nation? Would it be cheaper and more effective to buy all our AUKUS submarines from the US rather than try to build them here?
If, as the Prime Minister recently claimed, Australians stand up to bullies, why did he make excuses for China when its navy bullied us with unannounced live-fire exercises in the Tasman Sea? Why did a commercial airline pilot know about these exercises before our defence forces?
Are our children being taught about the social and economic successes of our country? Do high school students understand the basics of our economy and governance?

That last one is undiluted cult. Are children being taught the basic fundamentals of how to conform to a bullying cult? 




And do they properly and fully appreciate their rewards? Just substitute Oz for USA ...


The reptiles offered a different visual distraction... Why did the PM make excuses for China when its navy bullied us with unannounced live-fire exercises in the Tasman Sea? Picture: AFP



An alternative question. What did the reptiles expect him to do? Bung on a do, and perhaps start the war with China the reptiles yearn for, and well before Xmas at that?

Yet more tiresome questions flowed ...

How can the public sector become more productive when public servants are given the default option of working from home?
How have the additional 36,000 federal public servants employed over this term improved services or made government more effective?
Does Labor still believe the government sector should be no larger than 25 per cent of GDP? If so, when will it return to that level?
Are we over-regulated? How can red and green tape be cut?
Is it acceptable for a Muslim preacher to front a mob on a Sydney street and celebrate the slaughter of innocent Israelis? Is it acceptable for a similar mob to chant “F..k the Jews” on the steps of the Sydney Opera House? If not, why did the federal government do nothing in response to these events on October 8 and 9, 2023? Has the government’s constant and unjustified criticism of Israel helped to fuel anti-Israeli sentiment?

Alternative questions? Is the dog botherer in favour of ethnic cleansing? Does he enjoy watching a genocide unfold? Does he think even mentioning it makes the mentioner worthy of deportation?

As usual, the reptiles settled for a fear-mongering snap... Is it acceptable for a similar mob to chant “F..k the Jews” on the steps of the Sydney Opera House? Picture: NCA NewsWire/Jeremy Piper



Well they couldn't run a story or a snap about a Palestinian director being attacked by a mob of Israeli settlers...

And that, thankfully, was the end of the pond's meditative Sunday duties, though sadly with little to meditate on ...

If record education funding has not improved results relative to other countries, is it not time to look at other factors? Has the curriculum become crowded with social engineering and politically correct topics? Does education need to get back to the basics and how can a federal government make that happen?
Finally, if a country deliber­ately abandons its natural economic advantage of cheap energy, shuts down export industries such as the live cattle and sheep trade, and constrains and maligns other leading exports such as coal, gas and uranium, is that country not engaged in self-harm? Why would anyone choose a government that inflicts harm on its own country?

Who knows, because with that blather about coal and gas the dog botherer clearly doesn't give a flying fuck about climate science.

Maybe we'll find out about self-harm soon ...





Self-harm takes on all kinds of forms, usually backed by the reptiles' Faux Noise kissing cousins...





Guided by the lizard Oz, we too can do MAusGA ...





Saturday, March 29, 2025

In which the pond's nightmare begins, not helped by the bromancer, the Ughmann and the "Ned" Everest climb...

 

5 weeks. 

A nightmare played out over five weeks. As the official media organisation for the coalition, the reptiles have already been in phoney war campaign mode for weeks. Now it's on in earnest.

The pond would like to retreat, avoid it all, stay in bed under the covers for the entire five weeks. 

Alternatively the pond will favour reptiles looking beyond the bunker, but if today is any sign of things to come, it will be grum and likely to get grummer and grummer... (sorry, the pond lapses into Kiwi in times of stress).

The only thing to say about the lizard Oz's digital front page this day is that it carried an ad for 2GB. 

Yep, the reptiles are so desperate that they'll accept coin from Nine Radio, a division of Nine Entertainment (no entertainment there)...



There was simpleton Simon talking about the leaders beginning a campaign of fear, as if the reptiles knew nothing of relentless fear and loathing campaigning, when in reality it's their entire business model (is there Macquarie Law nearby to show it in action?)

Over on the extreme far right, things were just as desperate...




It was early in the day, but the pond was already haunted by that spectre. 

Later in the day, the reptiles will kick their media dog - ruff, ruff - to the kerb and the pond will kick him to Sunday, but the substitutes will be no better. 

Imagine the dog botherer in election mode ...

No need to imagine, the reptiles quickly turned over the extreme far right to the main players, and so there was an entirely new cast to contemplate ...




What a relief, there was Dame Slap doing the "woke" legal thing, there was snappy Tom, there was the dog botherer, being very doggie ... "crucial queries" ...

Query jokes aside, the pond fell on the bromancer like a famished lost soul willing to swallow anything ...

Albanese and Trump: the weird tag team destroying the alliance,Labor’s complete failure at national security combined with the US President’s high-octane diplomatic vandalism will inevitably threaten the ANZUS relationship.

This article contains features which are only available in the web version, Take me there

Sorry, the pond can't convey the full effect ... it was one of those uncredited gifs full of lightning strikes, as if AI had descended from the heavens ...




As for the bro, he was in a state of abject paranoia, and he maintained that condition for an almost unendurable ten minutes ...

As Australia braces for another low-rent, policy-feeble national election on May 3, Anthony Albanese and Donald Trump are a weird mixed-weight tag team of national leaders acting to weaken, conceivably even destroy, the Australian-American alliance that has been at the heart of Australian and Asian security since 1942.
Neither wants to destroy the alliance or even damage it. But each is hurting it badly. The Albanese government has been a comprehensive failure across every dimension of national security. It’s only a matter of time before its gravely irresponsible approach causes Trump to accuse it, justly, of being a free-rider ally and perhaps even decide ANZUS is no more to be cherished than NATO.
Beijing salivates at the prospect and revels in humiliating Australia, sending a powerful naval taskforce to interrupt trans-Tasman aviation and circumnavigate Australia, choosing future military targets, while our feeble navy can’t even refuel itself because our two supply ships are indefinitely out of service. Our seven decrepit Anzac-class frigates, which the Albanese government decided not to upgrade, each with its puny eight vertical launching system cells, are no match for the musclebound Chinese destroyer, with its 112 VLS cells, which led Beijing’s task force. In response to all of which Albanese’s government adopted the foetal position, perhaps secretly relieved that Trump won’t return the Prime Minister’s phone calls.
For his part, Trump has substantially betrayed Ukraine, handing great advantages to Russia’s dictator, Vladimir Putin; on April 2 Trump will impose new global tariffs that will almost certainly include Australia. His national security team, in the infamous leaked Signal exchanges about US military action against the Houthis in Yemen, displayed operational incompetence, staggering contempt for allies and a never-before-seen transactional approach so extreme they want Egypt and Europe to pay cash to the US for the benefits each derives from having Houthi attacks on international shipping suppressed.
Labor’s irresponsibility is evident in every dimension of the budget Jim Chalmers just delivered. You can die under an avalanche of defence numbers, certainly become catatonic from prolonged exposure to our steroidally prolix defence white papers and strategic statements.
So skip that for a moment and consider just three telling figures. Since Albanese came to office the share of the economy taken up by the federal government has risen from 24 per cent to 27 per cent in the coming year, a historic increase so vast and fast as to be nearly mad. In that time, defence spending has stayed at just 2 per cent of the economy.
Marcus Hellyer of Strategic Analysis Australia points out that in 2022-23 defence spending accounted for 7.85 per cent of government payments.

Some might think to hell with Hellyer, the new reptile flavour of the month, but what about the narcissism involved in featuring the bromancer chatting to petulant Peta on Sky Noise down under?

The Australian's Foreign Editor, Greg Sheridan, has slammed the Albanese government for its handling of national security, calling it a "shocking comprehensive failure" in every aspect. Mr Sheridan’s remarks come as the Albanese government revealed during the federal budget on Tuesday that it will bring forward $1 billion in defence spending to boost Australia's military capability. According to Mr Sheridan, despite the government's claims of increased spending on defence, the reality is that defence spending has remained stagnant at two per cent of GDP over the past three years. “As a percentage of government spending, it's declining,” he told Sky News host Peta Credlin. “They've embraced the nuclear submarine program, but that means they're going to spend a huge amount of money on nuclear submarines, but they've kept the budget static. There've been tiny, tiny real increases, but so, so small as to be infinitesimal.”



Double the serve, as if ten minutes of the bromancer wasn't enough already ... and the reptiles kept interrupting ...

There was this short rant ...

After three years of Labor, according to the government’s budget figures, which routinely overestimate the defence effort and underestimate the general growth of government spending, in 2025-26 defence will be 7.59 per cent of government payments. Time without number, Albanese and Defence Minister Richard Marles and their spokespeople have told us we’re living through the most dangerous strategic times since WWII. Yet defence has declined – yes, declined – as a proportion of government activity.

And then this visual interruption ...Anthony Albanese and Defence Minister Richard Marles have told us we’re living through the most dangerous strategic times since WWII, yet defence has declined. Picture: NCA NewsWire / Martin Ollman



Pity the poor unidentified scrambled egg type hovering in the b/g.

In a perverse way, the pond relished the bromancer's plight ...

He has to juggle King Donald with Oz defence, and what a reptile sleight of hand feat that is ...

The government is promising paltry future increases, but after three years in office its record, not its promises, are what it should be judged on. This is a national failure, not just a Labor failure. In 1975, we had 13 million Australians and 69,000 in the Australian Defence Force. Today our population has more than doubled to 27 million and the ADF has shrunk to a pitiful 58,000.
In his budget reply speech Peter Dutton barely mentioned defence. The Opposition Leader did say: “During the election campaign, we will announce our significant funding commitment to defence. A commitment which, unlike Labor’s, will be commensurate with the challenges of our time.”
If Dutton’s as good as his word, that would be very welcome. But, and it’s a big but, even if he announces a minimum credible effort – say, reaching 2.5 per cent of GDP within one term – the Opposition has done little to prepare the electorate for this.
Last year we spent about $55bn on defence, 2 per cent of GDP. To make it 2.5 per cent would mean $14bn more a year and rising. Can the electorate accept this without ever having had the ADF’s military purpose and strategic effect explained? Without a campaign to establish its necessity? As a nation we’re living in Tolstoy’s War and Peace but think we’re inhabiting Seinfeld, where nothing happens, nothing changes and everything ultimately is a joke. Meanwhile, Trump is providing a new, bracing and very challenging international context.
Of course, Trump is not our enemy. The threats to Australian security come from China, operating in concert with Russia, Iran and North Korea. Once, Washington guaranteed a military and economic order that provided for Australian security and allowed us to flourish. Trump is redefining America’s role.

Say what?

Of course, Trump is not our enemy.

Why "of course"? 

Aren't we a large island with mineral wealth? If King Donald ever gets to hear about it, and doesn't confuse the country with Austria ...

Then the reptiles showed JD at home rather than invading Greenland ... US Vice President JD Vance at the Marine Corps Base in Quantico, Virginia, on March 26, 2025. Vance is emerging as the dark version of this administration’s Dick Cheney. Picture: AFP




Come on reptiles, keep up ...



In the usual way, the Beast had ripped that story(archive link) from the Graudian's live coverage ...

The pond was perversely grateful to the bromancer for allowing a little romp in the snow, a chance to celebrate a little JD shit ...

Before listing the damaging new developments associated with Trump, there are important positives to note. Despite crippling national debt, and the Elon Musk-led drive to cut government spending, the US congress, in co-operation with Trump, just passed a budget that runs to September and increases military spending by $US12bn ($19bn). Whatever you make of Trump’s strategic gyrations, one result is that democratic NATO-Europe is rearming. Britain has announced a big immediate lift in defence spending. Germany has abolished longstanding national debt rules to massively enhance military capability. Within the Pentagon, resources are shifting to maritime, to the navy, to shipbuilding, away from army. But Ukraine, tariffs and the Signal leak constitute, or reveal, powerful new dynamics that are all bad for Australia.
In the past month, Trump has rescued Putin and showered him with benefits. Everyone understood there would need to be something like a ceasefire in place. But Trump pre-emptively gave Putin almost everything he wants: Ukraine never in NATO, no US security guarantee, no US back-up for any European peacekeeping force.
The US refused to condemn Russia’s invasion at the UN. It humiliated Volodymyr Zelensky in the White House and for a critical period suspended aid to Ukraine, including intelligence co-operation, which is vital for targeting. So far it has negotiated a limited prisoner swap, an agreement that Russia and Ukraine won’t attack each other’s energy facilities and a provisional Black Sea naval ceasefire, hugely beneficial to Russia, in exchange for which Moscow wants sanctions relief. That’s the kind of deal Barack Obama specialised in.
Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff, after meeting Putin, gave one of the most grotesque TV interviews in diplomatic history to Tucker Carlson. In demanding Ukraine give up four provinces, Witkoff couldn’t even remember their names. He praised Putin’s graciousness, especially in commissioning a portrait of Trump and in going to a church to pray for Trump after the assassination attempt, “not because Trump might be president but because they were friends”.

Put it like that and it sounded to the pond pretty much like ... Of course, Trump is our enemy.

Putin routinely has his critics, including genuine Christians such as Alexei Navalny, savagely murdered. To hear a US presidential envoy, steeped in ignorance, utter such craven emoluments for a brutal dictator was beyond any previously plausible dereliction. It’s perfectly sensible to dial back criticism of an opponent during a negotiation but Witkoff’s words were contemptible. They should send a shiver through any democrat who might one day be sacrificed to great power relationships.

Yep, Of course, Trump is our enemy.

The pond's heretical dreaming was interrupted by another AV offering, Sky News host Andrew Bolt slams US Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff’s “disgraceful” interview with Tucker Carlson which has Mr Witkoff acting like a “Putin fanboy”. “Finally, Witkoff truly shamed himself by acting like a total dupe, a Putin fanboy, I mean, how gullible is this guy,” Mr Bolt said. “This clown, Witkoff, likes him? Says he is not a bad guy? The final excerpt from this disgraceful interview, I mean let me show you how easy it is for a war criminal like Putin, to make Witkoff, this amateur, think, wow, Putin’s a nice guy.”



Et tu Bolter? Even you have had a FAFO moment?

Apparently the local reptiles are completely unaware of the diligent work being performed by their Faux Noise kissing cousins ... but no need to go there, that's what Mediaite is for ...



Quick, there's new lands above the Faux Noise Faraway Tree on the hour ...

The bromancer was now in his own FAFO mode ...

Trump has given dizzyingly contradictory signals about the coming tariffs. The latest thinking is they may not be as severe as first thought, partly because Trump is suffering a drop in popularity. Republicans just lost a state Senate seat in MAGA heartland in Pennsylvania. Trump’s addiction to psycho-drama and politics as theatre does give him a good deal of leverage but it also destroys the minimum stability that business needs, even American business.
Companies can die of overregulation under a president like Joe Biden or nervous exhaustion and chronic, senseless disorientation, under Trump.
If the US puts tariffs on Australian agriculture, or demands Australians pay US prices for drugs, or that our 12-year-olds must have access to American social media, this will cause a huge rise in anti-American sentiment in Australia.
The Signal conversation was a historic moment. It involved US Vice-President JD Vance, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Witkoff and several others.
That they would conduct such a discussion on Signal, including while Witkoff was in Russia, is shocking enough. Astoundingly, Jeff Goldberg, the left-of-centre editor of The Atlantic magazine, was unintentionally included on the chat and subsequently published slabs of the messages exchanged, which have been verified by the White House.

The reptiles helpfully identified the enemy, From left to right; US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, US Vice President JD Vance, US National Security Advisor Mike Waltz and senior Trump adviser Stephen Miller. Picture: AFP



The bromancer maintained his FAFO rage ...

The discussions were revealing and disturbing. Vance is emerging as the dark version of this administration’s Dick Cheney. He’s becoming an ultra-MAGA ideologue who exaggerates every resentment, some of them legitimate enough, and authorises every crackpot conspiracy and isolationist impulse.
Trump had already decided to take action against the Houthis. Vance didn’t like that and told his colleagues: “I think we’re making a mistake … I am not sure the President is aware how inconsistent this is with his message on Europe right now… I just hate bailing out Europe again.” Hegseth, though supporting Trump’s decision and arguing the need to re-establish American deterrence, replied: “I fully share your loathing of European free-loading. It’s PATHETIC.”
Stephen Miller, a senior Trump adviser, also supported military action but wrote: “We soon make clear to Egypt and Europe what we expect in return … If the US successfully restores freedom of navigation at great cost there needs to be some further economic gain extracted in return.” Apparently, Rubio, a long-term mainstream senator with deep foreign policy expertise, didn’t make any dumb comments. It’s a pity Trump chose Vance instead of Rubio as Vice-President. Anyone Trump can sack is insecure. Trump can’t sack the Vice-President, he can sack the Secretary of State.

It was great fun, with a repeat dose of the folly in full congress glare, Text messages by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth during an annual worldwide threats assessment hearing on March 26, 2025 in Washington, DC. Picture: Getty



How could the bromancer pull back on his FAFO indignation and save AUKUS?

It was difficult, it involved remarkable physical contortions and mental gymnastics, remarkable to behold, but he made it ...

This was crucial when push came to shove after the 2020 election and vice-president Mike Pence played a critical role in upholding the constitution. The Signal texts showed how widespread is the view in the Trump administration that virtually all allies are a net cost to the US.
They also delineated clearly some of the different camps in Trumpworld, which are often at odds with each other.
There’s the MAGA extreme, headed by Vance, who is a brilliant person, a gifted author and once held great promise but has journeyed down the rat holes of the paranoid style in American politics and MAGA isolationism.
There are the economic nationalists, represented in this conversation by Miller, who just want the money. There are Trump personality-cult worshippers vastly out of their depth, like Witkoff. There are reliable, pro-alliance China hawks like Rubio and Waltz. There are techno-believing “long-termers” like Elon Musk who think technology will in the long term solve all humanity’s problems and therefore it’s the only game in town. Trump is intermittently drawn to all these tendencies while essentially being a showman who dominates politics by dominating everything, especially every part of the media, including, perhaps especially, those parts of it that hate him.
So what do this Signal conversation and the broader Trump actions during the past month mean for Australia?

Aye, there's the rub. And the bromancer's answer? Kiss the ring, there might not be any guarantees, but all the same we must kiss the ring ...

In so far as you can reverse-engineer any strategy from the Albanese government’s incoherent actions, it seems to be the belief that Australia can have no effective military force, at least so far as China is concerned, for at least the next decade and probably much longer, and therefore shouldn’t waste any extra money on it. But, partly to keep the US alliance going, we have to put up a show of having a defence force, so we’ll keep a mostly symbolic force in place. Trump wants allies to pay the US money and, by investing in the US submarine industrial capacity to the tune of $5bn over the next few years, we can, uniquely perhaps, satisfy that requirement.
In the long run, one day, we may possibly get nuclear-powered submarines through AUKUS, this “strategy” goes, and they’ll have some military utility. But in the short, medium and long run, the US will take care of everything, just like always. Trump’s mood will change, this “strategy” holds. Or he will pass from the scene soon enough. The normal America will return and we can continue our simultaneously glacial, chaotic and ineffective approach to defence acquisition while sheltering forever under Uncle Sam’s warm shadow. This is insupportably unrealistic at every level.
We certainly should do everything we can to keep the alliance. God help the alliance if we end up with a minority government dependent on the Greens. Similarly, on the US side there’s no guarantee Trump won’t eventually react to what inadequate and lazy allies we’ve become. There’s no guarantee he’ll be succeeded by an old-style alliance Republican such as Rubio. Vance is more likely. Trump also could be succeeded by a left-wing isolationist Democrat from the Bernie Sanders/Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez school of the Democratic Party.
Whether you love or hate Trump, or find him both good and bad, it’s obvious an ally like Australia must do much more for its own security capability. Albanese promised an Australian merchant fleet. The number of Australian flagged vessels has declined. Nothing significant on fuel storage. We’re weaker militarily now than three years ago. We’ll spend nearly $100bn on AUKUS subs and Hunter-class frigates before the first of either comes into service.
AUKUS is good if an Australian government commits and funds it, and properly funds and expands the rest of the ADF. Instead, Labor has gutted the ADF to pay for AUKUS, setting up terrible, unpredictable, long-term dynamics.
Trump could engender severe anti-Americanism here and end up empowering the left, as he has done in Canada. The left hates the alliance. A responsible Australian government would hedge against all scenarios by rapidly acquiring independent, sovereign, deterrent capability. Albanese isn’t remotely interested. Is Dutton?

Perhaps the bromancer needs to do more Faux Noise watching ... or start taking his medication ...


Confronted by the Ughmann, what to do but offer him in silence?

Reading between the lines of spin in the unruly game of politics, Consumers are now supposed to be grateful for having their taxes recycled as “cost-of-living relief”. The arsonist demands thanks for waving a garden hose over his inferno.

No need to read between the lines.

The Ughmann is always painfully obvious.

Worse, it was a five minute read, or so the reptiles say, a bit like the five weeks of torture, with the villains immediately on parade, Treasurer Jim Chalmers, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Finance Minister Katy Gallagher on budget day. Picture: Hilary Wardhaugh/Getty Images



The Ughmann started with a flourish which immediately set the pond's teeth on edge, and made the pond snap out of its silence..

There is spin, and then there is lying.

Put it another way. There is spin from the reptiles, official state media for the coalition, and there is lying, and as you'd expect of official state media, the reptiles are expert in both.

Back to the silence, with the Ughmann certain to let his climate science denialism out for a trot ... but it'll take time to get there ...

Spin is putting a gloss on your performance, polishing a bruised apple. All of us are guilty of it sometimes, but it is the daily fare of politics, even when the spinner knows the apple is rotten.
As a creature of the treasurer and finance minister, all budgets are political documents and Tuesday’s spun like a top from page one of Budget Paper No.1.
A numbers necromancer in Labor hit on the wheeze of measuring the Albanese government’s budgetary performance from the starting point of the forecasts in the 2022 pre-election economic and fiscal outlook.
From that mark, the paper claimed: “The underlying cash balance has improved by a cumulative $207bn over the seven years to 2028-29. This is the largest nominal budget improvement in a parliamentary term.” Surely this is fair enough. Labor is simply measuring its progress from the moment the gun went off for the 2022 election race and awarding itself gold at the finish line.
Two things. First, this is a novel approach to budgeting. Second – as this column noted last week – even budget forecasts cast out over one year are guesstimates. Across seven, they are fantasy.
The political value of the 2022 prophecy is that it was fantastically wrong, even by the forgiving standards of Treasury crystal-ball gazing, because it underestimated revenue by an astonishing $400bn. To recast the purple prose of the budget papers: this is the biggest unexpected cash windfall in any parliamentary term.
As AMP economist Shane Oliver told this paper, “This is not good management, it’s good luck … I am amazed that the Treasurer is saying they have done all this hard work, but really it’s like they have won the Lotto.”
What did the Albanese government do with all that money? It vastly increased the size of government from 24.4 per cent of GDP to more than 27 per cent. This is a pandemic level of spending, locking in deficits that roll on forever.

The reptiles interrupted with an AV distraction featuring Danica, hostess from blonde hell ... As the 2025 federal election campaign officially kicks off, Liberal MP Andrew Wallace has called out Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's “disasters”. Speaking to Sky News host Danica De Giorgio, Mr Wallace slammed the tax cuts in Labor’s federal budget released earlier this week. “We have seen this Prime Minister launch from disaster to disaster to disaster,” he told Sky News host Danica De Giorgio. “The budget that was announced during the week, 70 cent a week tax cuts, and we have to wait for 15 months before we get them. “And if you compare that to Peter Dutton's halving of the excise tax in relation to fuel, diesel and petrol, that will be one of the first things that we move through Parliament if we're elected as our first point of order. “That will see benefits to average Australians with a car of $14 a week, around $750 a year. So that's good money, that's in your pocket.”



There's your reptile balance in a nutshell, and the Ughmann kept it coming ...

Gross debt will hit $1 trillion in the coming financial year, and the $28bn slated in interest payments is the seventh biggest item of government expenditure. With a bullet. In three years, it is expected to pass Medicare as the fifth-biggest expenditure line item, costing more than $41bn.
So, when measured against the things it can control, the Albanese government is perhaps the most profligate in history.
But judged from the mark it set itself in a game of fantasy football, it has played a blinder.
For the purposes of this argument, let’s be gracious and accept all this as fair play in the unruly game of politics. We will grumble but call no foul. This is spin. It is spin on a cycle not found on any washing machine setting made in this universe, but spin it is.
As Labor has written the rules, let’s use them to run another race based on a test it set itself. In the subjective world of politics, surely the last durable measure is to be held to account for your own words.

The villain of the moment scored a snap ...Jim Chalmers social media post ahead of Tuesday’s budget. Picture: Instagram



The caption didn't make any sense to the pond, but no point pausing to think ...

In early December 2021, Anthony Albanese and Chris Bowen delivered Labor’s Powering Australia plan. Albanese, then opposition leader, promised: “It will see electricity prices fall from the current level by $275 for households by 2025, at the end of our first term.”
This pledge was based on modelling done by RepuTex. It rested on the endlessly invoked claim that wind and solar were the lowest-cost sources of generation. This ignored two glaring problems. First, that’s only true when wind and solar generate – and they don’t generate most of the time. Second, electricity is sold in a marketplace and the wholesale price is set by the highest cost of generation, not the lowest. In times of peak demand, that price will rarely be set by wind or solar. Not now, not ever – because demand and prices peak as the sun rises and sets.
So, surely any model would have an eye to what sets the electricity price. Mostly, that’s still black coal in Queensland and NSW, and brown coal in Victoria. And usually it’s cheap. That’s the assumption Labor’s modelling made, locking in the price of black coal at the equivalent of $80 a metric tonne all the way through to 2040. But black coal is export quality and linked to international price movements.

Ah, sweet black innocent virginal Oz coal, of course of course, and then came another serve of indignant Danica... Sky News host Danica De Giorgio says Labor is trying to “infiltrate” social media. Ms De Giorgio said Labor engaged social media influencers to attend the federal budget lockup. “And help spruik its tax cuts.”



Oh dear, fancy trying to communicate with punters, when they should have stuck with fair and balanced reptile coverage worshipping coal ...

Anyone with a passing interest in energy should have been well aware the black coal price had doubled between January and August 2021 – from $115 to $247. In October it spiked to $300. That meant the wholesale price of electricity was already set on a disturbing upward march long before Labor’s modelling was released.
Come February 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine and the price of coal and gas spiked ever higher. By the time the election was called in April, the price had hit $450 a metric tonne – more than five times the figure baked into Labor’s modelling. Before the election in May, it reached $538.
Working for Nine News, I raised the high coal price and the flaws with Labor’s modelling in separate interviews with Albanese, Bowen and Jim Chalmers well before polling day 2022. All tenaciously clung to the line that the $275 price-cutting pledge would be delivered.
After the election Labor cried foul over the fact, in late 2021, Angus Taylor as energy minister had pushed the release of the regulator-set benchmark electricity price beyond the May 21 election. This is true but, again, it was obvious that retail prices would track the wholesale prices up.
Here Labor had a choice. The Albanese government could have used the delayed release of the price data to walk away from the promise – or at least concede it wouldn’t be delivered this term.
Instead, for three years, Labor clung doggedly to the $275 pledge, even as it began subsidising the soaring cost of power.
So, if the facts change do you change your mind? Or just massage the lines?
On budget night we got the answer when this line appeared in the Treasurer’s speech: “Electricity prices went down 25 per cent here last year.”
It’s axiomatic that if power prices are falling the government wouldn’t need to subsidise them. This breathtakingly cynical claim rests entirely on the morphine of energy subsidies suppressing the real pain of actual price hikes. The commonwealth share of subsidies now stands at $6.8bn.
Chalmers’ own budget papers confirm this: “Without commonwealth and state government electricity rebates, electricity bills would have been around 45 per cent higher in the December quarter 2024.”
Using Labor’s preferred measures of measuring its performance from when it took office – and citing nominal numbers – electricity prices on the east coast have risen by 43 per cent for residential bills and 53 per cent for business.
Consumers are now supposed to be grateful for having their taxes recycled as “cost-of-living relief”. The arsonist demands thanks for waving a garden hose over his inferno.
Can even the most generous interpretation call Labor’s latest line on electricity prices spin? And if it’s not spin, how would a reasonable person describe it?
Ignore the modelling and the “lines” – believe your bill. The real-world evidence is in, here and abroad: heavily weather-dependent grids are expensive and unreliable.
One day the subsidies will end and the poor will suffer most. That’s the truth I intend to keep prosecuting.

One thing's certain. He won't ever be talking about climate science, except perhaps with the insight of an unreformed seminarian ...

At this point the pond felt like doing a Colbert. Anything for light relief ...




Texas weird ...

Or what about this exercise in kiddy porn?




As for "Ned's" natter, it's a gargantuan 10 minute Everest climb. 

Worse, the pond could define "Ned's" approach and style in its sleep.

"Ned" will purport to offer balanced, both siderist insights, but inevitably little hoppy toads will pop out showing that the hive mind is strong in this one ...

The pond did a screen cap to start off, with that weird injunction This article contains features which are only available in the web version, Take me there, prominent, and yet the only notable feature was an uncredited gif with a nauseating wobble and rotating coins. It suggested that AI was intent on making the pond upchuck its breakfast...



The header was loaded with irony.

Albanese v Dutton: a contest over trust, This election will be loaded with negatives, and the risk for both leaders is that neither captures the Australian imagination.

The pond has no trust when it comes to the reptiles. And the pond knows the coverage will be loaded with negatives, and that "Ned" is guaranteed each week never to capture the pond's imagination.

Let the nightmare begin ...

Australia faces a brutal yet uninspiring election. This is an election that revolves around “who do you distrust least” – Anthony Albanese or Peter Dutton. It is a contest between a flawed government and a still unconvincing opposition.
The prospect is that a divided nation will vote for a minority government. The Albanese-Dutton contest will be loaded with negatives – and this drives unambitious and impractical agendas. It will be dominated by a narrowcast cost-of-living contest, the fear being that Australia is locked into a holding pattern, marking time in a world moving faster and getting more dangerous.
Albanese seeks to become the first prime minister since John Howard in 2004 to be re-elected, breaking the cycle of de-stabilisation while Dutton seeks to terminate a single-term Labor government, a feat not achieved since 1931.

Part of the game is to show pollies in unflattering poses, and sure enough, Anthony Albanese seeks to become the first prime minister since John Howard in 2004 to be re-elected. Picture: AFP



Those twisted lips gave "Ned" pompous, portentous energy to bray on ...

The risk for Albanese and Dutton is that neither captures the Australian imagination and that both major parties struggle, with their primary vote support suggesting the May 3 election may become a pointer to a more fractured nation and another big crossbench. This election is more unpredictable than usual and the campaign will be more decisive than normal.
Shadows have fallen across Australia’s future. The national interest imperative for Australia today is to be more competitive, strategically stronger and more productive – but that’s not happening in this election and the nation will end up paying an accumulated price. The election dynamic is that Labor is weakened, its record is flawed, but the pivotal point of the entire campaign may settle on Dutton’s ability to project as a strong prime minister. He seeks to model himself on Howard and diminish the Abbott-Turnbull-Morrison era.
Dutton’s pitch is that Australians are worse off today than three years ago, with people suffering from high shopping prices, skyrocketing energy bills, rent and mortgage stress, crime on the street, losing out on home ownership and the battle to see a GP. The Opposition Leader says the Australian dream is broken and, unless Labor is removed, “our prosperity will be damaged for decades to come”.

Look now at a smirking snap of the Duttonator, dressed in black, and with the smirk of an undertaker, Peter Dutton seeks to terminate a single-term Labor government, a feat not achieved since 1931. Picture: Lyndon Mechielsen/Courier Mail



How like a crocodile he looks ... how effective he is in "Ned's" eyes ...

Dutton has an effective “back on track” slogan. He pledges a five-point recovery plan – a stronger economy with lower inflation, cheaper energy, affordable homes, quality healthcare and safer communities – yet he has failed to provide a credible economic policy, a tenable reform agenda and, so far, prioritises a halving of fuel excise over tax cuts and tax reform, signalling a cautious, even a “small target” Coalition tactic.
Albanese’s message, flashing his Medicare card, is that “only Labor can make you better off”. He invokes his 2022 pitch: “no one held back, no one left behind”. He claims people will be $7200 worse off under the Coalition and depicts Labor as the party that is “building for the future”. Albanese’s message, following Jim Chalmers’ budget, is that the “economy has turned the corner” and the worse is behind.

By way of contrast, how contrived and calculating is Albo, The PM’s message, flashing his Medicare card, is that “only Labor can make you better off”. Picture: AFP



"Ned" kept raising saucy doubts and fears, in the patented "Ned" way...

Albanese runs on his record. But is that his problem? He highlights cost-of-living relief, higher wages, more bulk billing, cheaper medicines, help with energy bills, cutting student debt and a new personal income tax cut. His weakness is offering more of the same to a pessimistic public, with many people seeing him as a weak or indifferent leader.
Hence Labor’s pivotal ploy – its effort to destroy Dutton as it destroyed Scott Morrison in 2022, with Albanese claiming Dutton will “cut everything except your taxes”. He says Dutton is the great risk to Australians but the danger for Labor is that its scare against the Liberal leader won’t work a second time.
There are two harsh realities you won’t hear about in the campaign – Labor’s election agenda and mandate if re-elected is grossly inadequate to the needs of the nation across the next three years while the Coalition assumes the spending and tax reforms it intends to implement in office cannot be successfully marketed from opposition. So don’t expect to hear a lot about them.
For Albanese, the election prospect is humiliation but survival. With Labor holding a notional 78 seats and the Coalition a notional 57 seats in the new 150-strong chamber, the idea of Dutton being able to achieve a win is his own right is remote. It would be a herculean feat.
Yet virtually every recent poll suggests Albanese cannot win a second term as a majority prime minister. To defy these numbers would constitute a stunning recovery. For Albanese, being forced into minority government after one term – a repeat of the Rudd-Gillard fate in 2010 – would represent a devastating setback, demanding all his skill to manage a minority executive reliant on a crossbench of Greens and teals.

At this point the reptiles produced a flurry of animated polls, which the pond must note, even if the methodology isn't revealed ... just admire the gloss ...







The pond swears that was all. No indication of the poll's size, or who conducted it, or what organisation had extracted it from their backside ...

Who knows what the margin of error was? It's not like the Graudian, which at least tries to offer details of the dismal art...

Never mind, back to the climb, and "Ned" in full Chicken Little mode...

While Dutton is running for victory after one term, forcing Labor into minority government would empower the Coalition after its dismal 2022 defeat and open the prospect of a substantial change of government at the subsequent poll, a repeat of the Tony Abbott story. The collective risk for Albanese and Dutton, however, is public disillusionment with the major parties caused by their mutual policy inadequacies.
Remember, it is Labor’s weak 32.58 per cent primary vote in 2022 that has limited the government ever since and driven its pervasive caution.
The fear is a 2025 election campaign of bipartisan mediocrity leading to a compromised new parliament and a weakened government.
On Labor’s side, the comparison will be made between Albanese and Jim Chalmers as to who is the best campaign performer – a pointer to the future. On the Coalition side, this is Dutton’s first campaign as leader and his test will be to curb thought bubbles and stick by precise policy positions, otherwise he will be in trouble.
With his momentum faltering Dutton, in his budget reply on Thursday night, put more substance into his alternative policy agenda but still suffers from the gulf between his promise and his policies. He pledges a stronger economy, cutting red and green tape, making Australia a mining, agricultural, construction and manufacturing powerhouse, but there is little detail on how the Coalition will realise its better economy or deliver a better budget bottom line.

The reptiles dragged in another AV distraction ... Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has delivered his budget reply ahead of the looming federal election.



The pond yearned for a different kind of visual distraction ...



That's better, that meant the pond could swallow the "Ned" raw prawn whole ...

A pivotal judgment from Dutton and opposition Treasury spokesman Angus Taylor – at least so far – is their rejection of tax cuts and tax reform in the campaign while attacking Labor for increasing income tax by 24 per cent. They dismiss Labor’s modest tax cut for everyone in Chalmers’ budget, worth $5 a week from July 1, 2026, and $10 from July 1, 2027.
Dutton’s judgment is that people want immediate cost-of-living relief rather than tax cuts down the track. But the contradiction remains: the party pledged to lower taxes is the party opposing Labor’s election tax cut. This reflects Taylor’s conviction that tax relief is a function of spending restraint and must be tied to a new fiscal strategy implemented in office.
Energy policy offers the most dramatic differences between Dutton and Albanese, proving that the climate wars are as intense as ever and energy bipartisanship is a forlorn hope. Dutton’s more expansive policy involves ramping up domestic gas production, forcing 10-20 per cent of export gas into the east coast domestic market, decoupling the domestic price from the international price and accelerating gas investment, projects, pipelines and new fields – an ambitious agenda that will provoke conflict and commercial challenges but cannot deliver his pledge of lower energy prices in the short term.
In the immediate term Dutton offers a populist cut in fuel excise for 12 months to help people with cost-of-living pressures and nuclear power in the distant long run, though whether this is ever a realistic option in Australia remains dubious. At the same the Coalition has responded to grassroots hostility towards renewable infrastructure, with Dutton saying: “There’s no need to carpet our national parks, prime agricultural land and coastlines with industrial scale renewables.”
This is a frontal assault on the Albanese-Bowen renewables-driven climate policy that is being undermined by the experience of higher power prices not likely to dissipate any time soon. While Dutton’s policy will face resistance in the teal-held seats, it has the potential to win support in suburban and regional Australia.
Dutton promises a stronger defence budget but postpones the figures to the campaign. He still needs more details on the 25 per cent cut in the permanent immigration. He pledges to “energise” defence industry – that’s essential – but he doesn’t say how. He attacks Labor’s industrial relations policies but, apart from pledging to revert to a simple definition of a casual worker, says nothing about most of Labor’s pro-union anti-productivity IR laws.
On safer political ground, he prioritises the attack on criminality in the building industry – restoring the construction industry watchdog and de-registering the CFMEU. There is tax relief for small business, access for first-home buyers up to $50,000 of their super for a home deposit, commitments to women’s health, youth mental health and policies for a safer nation with more social cohesion.

That was a huge chunk, and immediately the reptiles only had nasty words for Jimbo, Jim Chalmers’ budget has exposed Labor’s limitations.. Picture: NewsWire/Martin Ollman



No indication of "Ned's" limitations, and worse, no limits on the verbiage.

Still, it was the final visual interruption, and the pond knew it was on the home stretch. 

Sure, it had been a two miler (3,200 metres if you will), and it was an incredibly tedious and lengthy final gobbet, but the pond has stayed the course, and has been true to its mission, which is to stay silent for five interminable weeks while the reptiles blathered away, rolled in the mud, and generally bored the pond into a state of mute catatonia...

Dutton pledges to “rein in inflationary spending” but there is little framework on how this happens. He will end Labor’s off-budget funds – the $20bn Rewiring the Nation Fund and the $10bn Housing Australia Future Fund, scrap the $16bn production tax credits and reverse Labor’s increase of 41,000 Canberra-based public servants – while pledging not to cut frontline service-delivering roles.
Dutton makes a big claim. He says: “This election matters more than others in recent history.” But why? Is that because of Labor’s failures or because of the Coalition’s alternative credo? That credo remains a work in progress.
The Coalition goes into this campaign short on the policy agenda it needs to make this a truly decisive election.
This means that Dutton, presumably, will have a lot to reveal in the campaign. That is an opportunity as well as a risk. How much fresh policy will Albanese announce? He is smart to have a short five-week campaign.
This Chalmers budget has exposed Labor’s limitations. It is locked into a social spending escalation difficult to break; a productivity outlook – the prime driver of living standards – that is stagnant; high personal income tax far into the future; and in a more dangerous world that demands a further lift in defence spending, Labor repudiates such a choice.
Yet the budget reveals Labor’s ability to offer a plausible case for re-election with the economy in recovery mode. Chalmers said: “Inflation is down, incomes are rising, unemployment is low, interest rates are coming down, debt is down and growth is picking up momentum.” Labor’s problem is that it cannot repair the substantial 8 per cent fall in living standards since it took office. If people vote on cost-of-living outcomes, then Labor loses. But they vote on a comparison between Labor and Coalition policies and, in reality, both sides are vulnerable. Labor, however, cannot escape responsibility for the flawed tax-spending legacy it leaves after three years.
The election will test whether the Australian public prioritises debt and debt reduction or if economic accountability is a forlorn political notion. Australia under Labor is marching into a new identity as a high government spending, high personal income tax nation – the significance of the budget is to confirm the trend but almost certainly underestimate its extent.
Labor’s fiscal rules are too weak. The budget for 2025-26 plunges into a $42bn deficit after two earlier years of surpluses. This is followed by a decade of deficits. The headline deficit over the next four years (including off-budget spending) totals a monstrous $283bn. Gross debt will reach $1.223 trillion in four years. Spending in real terms (taking account of inflation) increases by 6 per cent in 2024-25, an extraordinary figure outside a downturn crisis. It is forecast to rise by 3 per cent in 2025-26; that’s still high. The budget forecasts spending to settle across the next four years at a plateau of around 26.5 per cent of GDP, distinctly higher than the recent trend.
It is idle to think productivity will be an election issue. But its legacy – falling living standards – will affect nearly everybody. The Productivity Commission’s quarterly bulletin released this week shows labour productivity declined 0.1 per cent in the December quarter and by 1.2 per cent over the year. Productivity Commission deputy chairman Alex Robson said: “We’re back to the stagnant productivity we saw in the period between 2015 and 2019 leading up to the pandemic. The real issue is that Australia’s labour productivity has not significantly improved in over 10 years.”
Here is an omen – unless productivity improves then Australian governments will struggle, the community will be unhappy and restless, and national decline will threaten.
Yet budget week was a sad commentary on our shrunken policy debate. The election prelude has been a Labor and Coalition brawl over one of the smallest income tax cuts in history. The Coalition voted against Labor’s tax cut, branded it a “cruel hoax”, pledged to repeal the tax cut in office and delivered instead a halving of fuel excise with Dutton saying the proposal would be introduced in parliament on the first day of a Coalition government. It would be implemented immediately, last only 12 months and cost $6bn.
The gain is $14 a week for a household filling up once a week and with a yearly saving of $700 to $750. For households with two cars filling up weekly the saving will be around $28 weekly or close to $1500 over 12 months.
Dutton said it would help people commuting to work, driving kids to sport and pensioners doing it tough. His populist excise cut looks a winning cost-of-living ploy.
But not so fast. By opposing Labor’s tax cut, the Coalition gives Labor a powerful rhetorical campaign. The tax cut is small but, as Chalmers said, “meaningful”. It threatens, however, to become symbolic.
“Labor is the party of lower taxes,” Albanese told parliament on Thursday to Coalition jeers.
It means a Dutton government would be pledged to increase taxes for all taxpayers. (But probably would not have the numbers to repeal the tax cut anyway.) Defending the tactics, Taylor said the excise cut was “highly targeted relief, temporary but also immediate”.
Chalmers told parliament the Coalition stood for three things – higher personal income tax, secret cuts to spending and no permanent cost-of-living relief.
In this election Albanese fights on two fronts: against the Coalition and the Greens.
Dutton fights on two fronts: against Labor and the teals given their blue-ribbon Liberal seat gains from 2022. The election will test whether the Coalition still has an existential problem with both young and female voters. It is fatuous to think these burdens are expurgated.
The nation is crawling ahead, living conditions are in gradual repair and policy is locked in a slow lane. Our political system – Labor and Coalition – is running shy of the challenges that demand an ambitious response. But elections are chances to shift the nation’s mood and open new doors. Let’s hope both Albanese and Dutton rise to the occasion and the opportunity. This is what Australia needs.

Not so fast? Then why so interminably slow? Who made it through that incredible amount of gunk, like being trapped in a bog in a slo-mo nightmare?

And with the greatest disrespect, the pond doesn't need "Ned" telling it what it needs. In fact the pond doesn't need any of the reptiles for the next five weeks.

What the pond needs is a goodly supply of 'toons, and the pond prays that the immortal Rowe is up to the job of showing the circus in action ...




And there'll be the details, always the details, though the pond thinks that some of them will never make the reptile cut ...even the bromancer might flinch at the sight ...