The pond experienced its first black out of the winter last night and being reptile-trained, knew what it foretold - the arrival of the renewables apocalypse.
The pond organised a raiding party to deal with the zombie hordes and bunkered down, only to be disappointed when the lights came back on twenty minutes later. Apparently the apocalypse had been postponed ...
Not so the dire prospect of waking up on a weekend and contemplating reptile follies, and sure enough there was the bromancer in the extreme far right position of the digital edition, top of the reptile world ma...
Not the bloody war on China and not bloody Jennifer Westacott trying to make a name for herself ... while the genocide in Gaza picks up speed ...
For some reason the pond wasn't up for a genocide on a Saturday morning ...
Down below the landscape was equally depressing...
The pond realises that the dog botherer was also lurking, but he was just doing the Albo strut, much like "here no conflict of interest" simplistic Simon ...
Then there was Westacott herself, blathering on about hate speech while the genocide kept on keeping on, and the craven Craven determinedly confusing and conflating anti-Semitism with anti-genocide, as if it was impossible to have a fair degree of contempt for Hamas while also having a fair degree of contempt for barking mad Jewish fundamentalists determined on a genocide and the demolition of Gaza ... and that's how the pond ended up with the Ughman ...
The pond won't be making that mistake any time soon. What a prize portentous pontificating loon ...
The pond long ago gave up attending mass, but who knew that attending the lizard Oz would be like attending Ascension Sunday, or if you will the seventh Sunday of Easter, with Our Lady of Fatima day to follow ...
The pond used to routinely joke about the lizard Oz being the Catholic Boys' Daily, but sometimes the joke wears more than a little thin ...
Was there any sign of life, was there any hope, was there a silver lining to the dark clouds?
The pond decided to turn back the clock a few days to Daanyal Saed in Crikey asking Is Sky News Australia's influence dying? (perhaps a paywall but the pond can never tell because of auto log in).
The piece had been referenced by correspondents, and there were graphs, which made it suitable for an ABC finance report, and there had to be some sign of hope after suffering, neigh enduring the Ughman ... (I am the walrus) ...
Just the opening image alone warmed the cockles of the pond's heart ...
Petulant Peta in black and white, looking suspiciously like Morticia in The Addams Family ...
Then came the graphs, as promised ...
Could it be, it all seemed very technical, but the pond was open to any suggestion that Sky had fallen from grace, like a graph on a downward spiral ...
If you like you can follow that link to The Atlantic to read Paul Farhi scribbling Right-Wing Media Are in Trouble, The flow of traffic to Donald Trump's most loyal digital-media boosters isn't just slowing: it's utterly collapsing ... (again maybe a paywall).
This past February, readership of the 10 largest conservative websites was down 40 percent compared with the same month in 2020, according to The Righting, a newsletter that uses monthly data from Comscore—essentially the Nielsen ratings of the internet—to track right-wing media. (February is the most recent month with available Comscore data.) Some of the bigger names in the field have been pummeled the hardest: The Daily Caller lost 57 percent of its audience; Drudge Report, the granddaddy of conservative aggregation, was down 81 percent; and The Federalist, founded just over a decade ago, lost a staggering 91 percent. (The site’s CEO and co-founder, Sean Davis, called that figure “laughably inaccurate” in an email but offered no further explanation.) FoxNews.com, by far the most popular conservative-news site, has fared better, losing “only” 22 percent of traffic, which translates to 23 million fewer monthly site visitors compared with four years ago.
Some amount of the decline over that period was probably inevitable, given that 2020 was one of the most intense and newsiest years in decades, propping up publications across the political spectrum. But that doesn’t explain why the falloff has been especially steep on the right side of the media aisle.
What’s going on? The obvious culprit is Facebook. For years, Facebook’s mysterious algorithms served up links to news and commentary articles, sending droves of traffic to their publishers. But those days are gone. Amid criticism from elected officials and academics who said the social-media giant was spreading hate speech and harmful misinformation, including Russian propaganda, before the 2016 election, Facebook apparently came to question the value of featuring news on its platform. In early 2018, it began deemphasizing news content, giving greater priority to content posted by friends and family members. In 2021, it tightened the tap a little further. This past February, it announced that it would do the same on Instagram and Threads. All of this monkeying with the internet’s plumbing drastically reduced the referral traffic flowing to news and commentary sites. The changes have affected everyone involved in digital media, including some liberal-leaning sites—such as Slate (which saw a 42 percent traffic drop), the Daily Beast (41 percent), and Vox (62 percent, after losing its two most prominent writers)—but the impact appears to have been the worst, on average, for conservative media. (Referral traffic from Google has also declined over the past few years, but far less sharply.)
Unsurprisingly, the people who run conservative outlets see this as straightforward proof that Big Tech is trying to silence them. Neil Patel, a co-founder (with Tucker Carlson) of the Daily Caller, told me that the tech giants want “to crush any independent media that was perceived to have been helpful to Trump’s rise.” Patel calls this a form of “Big Tech–driven viewpoint discrimination” that “should scare any fair-minded individual.”
A simpler explanation is that conservative digital media are disproportionately dependent on social-media referrals in the first place. Many mainstream publications have long-established brand names, large newsrooms to churn out copy, and, in a few cases, large numbers of loyal subscribers. Sites like Breitbart and Ben Shapiro’s The Daily Wire, however, were essentially Facebook-virality machines, adept at injecting irresistibly outrageous, clickable nuggets into people’s feeds. So the drying-up of referrals hit these publications much harder.
And so far, unlike some publications that have pivoted away from relying on traffic and programmatic advertising, they’ve struggled to adapt. Rather than stabilizing amid Facebook’s new world order, traffic on the right has mostly continued south. Among the big losers over the past year are The Washington Free Beacon, whose traffic was down 58 percent, and Gateway Pundit, down 62 percent. Compare that with prominent mainstream and liberal sites, which, although still well below their 2020 heights, have at least stanched the bleeding. Traffic to The Washington Post and The New York Times from February 2023 to February 2024 was essentially flat. Slate’s was up 14 percent...
There's more at the link, but, be still beating heart, the pond will - spoiler alert - just do the last par ...
The precipitous decline in traffic to conservative publications raises a larger and possibly unanswerable question: Did these operations ever really hold the political and cultural clout that critics ascribed to them at their peak? Recall the liberal anger in 2020 when Ben Shapiro was routinely dominating Facebook’s most-engaged content list, generating accusations that Facebook’s algorithm was favoring right-wing posts and pushing voters toward Trump. Yet Joe Biden went on to win the election easily, and Democrats overperformed in the 2022 midterms. Now, as conservatives cry that Big Tech has crushed their traffic, Trump is running neck and neck with Biden in the polls, even with a legal cloud hanging over him and shortfalls of campaign cash. Maybe who wins the traffic contest doesn’t matter as much as it once appeared.
Well Major Sheridan might talk about China and Russia,but he might reflect on the USA history of aggression and war mongering. There is so much wrong with the bromacers reasoning about both Russia and China and as with both countries are entitled not be spied on by foriegn countries at the behest of America. China do not have a history of invading other countries with perhaps minor disputes over borders but think how many millions of innocent people have been killed by USA invasions that are to numerous to go through.
ReplyDeleteHe does seem to think Athens was a Leninist regime.
DeleteOn Greg's unequivocally deliberate and sustained playing of chicken-hawk with the Reds: "Yes, they are getting ready for another war. Why shouldn't they?....The Pacific is a great big ocean. We have a tremendous coastline on the Pacific. Will the maneuvers be off the coast, two or three hundred miles? Oh, no. The maneuvers will be two thousand, yes, perhaps even thirty-five hundred miles, off the coast....The [Chinese], a proud people, of course will be pleased beyond expression to see the United States [auxiliary] fleet so close to [China]'s shores. Even as pleased as would be the residents of California [or the Northern Territory] were they to dimly discern, through the morning mist, the [Chinese] fleet playing at war games off Los Angeles [or Darwin]."
Deletehttps://gutenberg.ca/ebooks/butlersd-warisaracket/butlersd-warisaracket-00-h.html
Pond - never fear the apocalypse of unreliable power - Ted O’Brien is your man, seeking a nuclear future at any cost, and no international or local experts are going to tell him otherwise.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/article/2024/may/10/coalition-mps-dismiss-international-energy-agency-advice-to-ditch-nuclear-plans
The thing about nuclear is that you have it forever (a bit like posting on social media, it’s there forever) - even the half life of the stuff will see out most of humanity. Not even Labor gas will deter Ted because, like his colleagues and the reptiles, there is nothing they distrust more than experts. But I do have some property advice - do not buy within the nuclear exclusion zone of existing power stations, just in case. AG.
I see that Malcolm Knox - on the same page as an unclaimed note about Amie Kaufman "whose books have banned in the US" - so it's not only councils that are banning, it's books too, obviously banning each other - was the SMH's chief cricket correspondent, 1996-1999, and that: "Between 1989 and 1993 he didn’t watch any movies or listen to any music."
ReplyDeletehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcolm_Knox_(author)
Where do they get them from ?
ReplyDelete‘Ah, so it doesn't matter that no one pays attention to the pond, that's a sign of hope ... ‘
So it has come to this - here I am quoting the Pond. But it does matter that WE are paying attention. My partner and I wonder whether anyone actually reads the dog botherer, nattering Ned, the Bro, Major Mitchell, the quarry whisperer, or any of the gang, even if they buy the Oz - probably just reading the stock exchange and sports pages. Seriously who would bother ploughing through Henry or Dame Groan - only the Pond and her devoted readers. It matters because between the lines, sometimes in the lines themselves, the coalition’s propaganda agenda is revealed (there’s certainly no policy agenda, but then the coalition doesn’t want one, they just want more tax breaks and grants). We already know that government spending (the need to stop it) and immigration (the need to stop it) will be key attack points heading for the next elections (federal or state). It’s funny that the need to stop government actually doing something often seems to be a focal point of the coalition, hence they crave government in order not to stop it - makes sense. Anyway do not despair - there are likely to be further attack points revealed as we barrel into the next election. AG.
oops - should read 'hence they crave government in order to stop it' AG
DeleteThey are all faith 'n fluence*, and no tip of reason at the "w'Oz reasonable", now all ye "faithfull" red rag o bull reptile riters.
ReplyDeleteYet Ughman unwittingly declares Loonpond enlightened. We already knew. Fret not Loonpondians, the Ughman says reason-able people are enlightened. (In his only palette now - b&w)
"Those who claim the heritage of reason have discounted the role of faith in their enlightenment."
Ughman misses the point.
Discount faith. Because reason. Sane and wise. As opposed to the reasonably shunned ex seminarian Ughman, saying religious schools are far more tolerant of difference than "progressives."!
Gotta have faith over reason to come up with that crap.
~ George Michael says,
"Oh, when that love comes down without devotion
Well it takes a strong UGman, baby
But I'm showin' you the door"
"'Cause I gotta' have faith
I gotta have faith
Because I gotta have faith, faith, faith
I got to have faith, faith, faith"
I hope the Fluence* of the Chinese wall between Gai and Chris is reason-ably faith proof as "Uhlmann is married to Gai Brodtmann... "a member of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute council."
* "Fluence - "Shortened form of influence.
Noun - fluence (plural fluences)
"A magical or mysterious force; hypnotic power; energy."
Wiktionary
Loonpond inoculates against fluence. Koolaid on the other hand...
It's one of those days; so Ughlman would push this upon us: "Universal equality is captured in Paul's letter to the Galatians: 'There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you all are one in Christ Jesus'."
ReplyDeleteAnd just like much of Christianity, it's never been true anywhere at any time, and it still isn't true. But then, anyway, nobody ever really believed "Paul" (aka Saul of Tarsus) - who never encountered Christ Jesus in person despite them supposedly being co-located contemporaries - did they.
Anyway, finally we come to this: "...the Labor Party pledge demands its members not be part of any other organisation that is inimical to its ideals. Why shouldn't religious schools enjoy the same right?" And who says they don't ? But anyway, if we're indulging in a bit of "logos" would it be pertinent to note that the Labor Party is an organisation which its adult members freely choose to join, or not, and from which they can leave at any time of their own free choice, but that the attendees of religious schools have no such rights.
This "liberty to ensure your children are educated in your creed" stuff is just a continuance of the 'parents totally own their children' fallacy that State/Church separation was meant to terminate.
So the Uhlmann (why is he shy of using his full given name - Greek ‘bearing Christ’?) asserts his perspective on this ‘New Way’ as a body which sets out to police heresy.
ReplyDeleteHis writing for this day has already set up a mythical Christianity, in which all ‘love one another’. Except that - we have heard of heresy before, haven’t we? It was brought to a high level of refinement as the ‘faith’ - it was hardly a manifestation of ‘reason’, however this bearer of Christ might want us to believe his church is a marriage of reason and faith - as the ‘faith’ contemplated its God, not as ‘reason itself’, but as any of several forms - or three in one - or take your pick. Just don’t pick a form that did not wholly accord wth the version promulgated by the dominant faction in the church of the time, or the ‘love’ that its rulers would express to you could make your life very uncomfortable - and with abrupt ending.
In that spirit of reason, during many of the hunts for heresy, the church hierarchy - guided by God, of course - accepted ‘evidence’ from persons who may, or may not, have known you, but were prepared to offer statements about you that needed no further verification, provided they revealed your failings. ‘Truth’ was a malleable concept in hearings on heresy.
At one time, Uhlmann was accepted as a relatively serious journalist. His column for this day does nothing to maintain any such reputation. Is it serious journalism to mention ‘heresy’ in context with human rights commissions? How many people have they broken on the rack?
A quick scan of what Robert Wargas contributes to the American Catholic Herald - steadily supporting the mythical Trump character - suggests that this bearer of Christ sees a regular gig on the Flagship, churning out the same pap.
How long before our esteemed Dorothy generates another red-card, because there is no hint of entertainment in what he writes, and his development of logic is more confusing than what we already cannot digest from ‘Ned’ Kelly?
Fair go, Chad, DP can't red-card everybody; all we'd have left would be the Bromancer, Noddles Ned and the Doggy Bov. Oh, and Mein Gott I suppose.
DeleteOh - and on truth as a malleable concept - order in popcorn for more of the Littleproud V Sussssan about who on their side (sides??) has been in favour of shoving CO2 into the artesian basin. Real kiddie sandbox stuff
ReplyDeleteIt would appear that the failures of Uhlmann, Sheridan and Abbott to complete priesthood studies at the various seminaries makes them experts on morality; in fact I have a sneaking suspicion that they failed because the seminarians realised that their reason for joining was not that they wanted to spread the word of god, nor universal human rights or even reason, but that each of them thought they were god.
ReplyDeleteUhlmann: "This is an extreme form of Laicism by a fierce 'progressive crusade against Christianity. In a mutltifaith society that means all believers are on this battlefield, as the institutions of government are mobilised against them."
The Xians do so love the war mongering. Perhaps a quote from Haruki Murakami, {Kafka on the Shore] might calm things:
“If you think God’s there, He is. If you don’t, He isn’t. And if that’s what God’s like, I wouldn’t worry about it.”
Uhlmann: "The commission is erasing the right of a religious school to organise around its own ethos." and "The arc of history has bent out of shape. ...They discriminate and call it equality. They unreasonably seek to force the faithful to heel."
Religions can organise around their ethos all they like, but they cannot force others to organise around it. They cannot discriminate and call it morality and love of others.
Perhaps a quote from A. C. Grayling is needed:
"Religious apologists complain bitterly that atheists and secularists are aggressive and hostile in their criticism of them. I always say: look, when you guys were in charge, you didn't argue with us, you just burnt us at the stake. Now what we're doing is, we're presenting you with some arguments and some challenging questions, and you complain."
Uhlmann: "Here let's recall that the Labor Party pledge demands its members not be part of any other organisation that is inimical to its ideals. Why shouldn't religious schools enjoy the same right?"
Probably because transgender, gay and other individuals are not an organisation, so the comparison is fallacious.
Uhlmann:" Those who claim the heritage of reason have discounted the role of faith in their enlightenment."
Enlightenment and faith are two separate things since religious faith is not based on reason at all, whereas enlightenment is. Perhaps best to end with A.C. Grayling:
" It is time to refuse to tiptoe around people who claim respect, consideration, special treatment, on the grounds that they have a religious faith, as if having faith were a privilege. endowing virtue, as if it were noble to believe in unsupported claims and ancient superstitions.
'Against All gods'."
[ Quotes are from https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/atheism ]
Well said anon. If the murdochs want to represent the catholic religion and be spokesmen for the liberal party they should give up trying to be journalists as we can see they have failed at both.
DeleteAs we are at Loonpond and rational / faith / end of religion infering world end is up today, an Algernon, world end predictor and initiator of the ism re Rational -- Eliezer Yudkowsky - declared; "I'm not a self-righteous loon,..." some here may appreciate this article. Worth it just for Extropia.
ReplyDelete"Extropia's Children, Chapter 1
The Wunderkind
JON EVANS
OCT 17, 2022
Chapter 1: The Wunderkind
"Back in the nineties, a self-taught teenage supergenius joined an obscure mailing list. That odd seed led directly, via Harry Potter fanfic, to today's prominent Effective Altruism and AI Risk movements; to bizarre, cult-like communities whose highly intelligent members feared demons in their minds might cause them to create hells or accidentally exterminate humanity; and, indirectly, to the birth of Bitcoin. Intrigued? Come down the rabbit hole into the epic, surreal, barely plausible saga of Extropia's Children.
...
"i. Origin Story
“I don't have time to be a teenager,” wrote 17-year-old Eliezer Yudkowsky, already obsessed with his lifelong mission to save humanity from itself. Poor kid. He had already put up a web page informing the world of his genius, including the important points “I am not a Nazi,” “I am not a teenager,” “I don't think I'm better than 'normals,' or as I call them, 'full humans,'“ “I'm not a self-righteous loon,” and “I'm not overestimating my intelligence.”
...
https://aiascendant.substack.com/p/extropias-children-chapter-1-the-wunderkind
Via;
Sean on May 10, 2024 12:46 AM at 12:46 am said:
"Possibly AI safety? A detailed sketch of these movements, their connections, and what topics you should be wary of them on is “Extropia’s Children” https://aiascendant.substack.com/p/extropias-children-chapter-1-the-wunderkind
https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2024/05/09/who-understands-alignment-anyway/#comment-2371934