Monday, September 25, 2023

In which the pond kicks the Major into a late afternoon slot, starts with JC, and follows with Killer Katerist rants about Kovid ...

 

Mea culpa, mea culpa maxima. Over the course of the weekend, the pond missed these fine reptile offerings ...


 




On the other hand, given that the pond has offered dozens of lectures about the dangers of renewables, has garrulous Gemma got anything knew to say?

And who cares about Dame Slap's mutterings about sexual meat? So long as she stands up for the likes of Rusty, all will be well. And once having noted that the craven Craven, having made an almighty mess of his blathering about the Voice, still has the cheek to make a public appearance, is there anything else to be added?

While on the mea culpa, the pond must extend this to the reptiles because they missed the story featured in both Granny and L'Age, and it seems that the Nine mob still have a graphics department, though they share the results between the Sydney and Melbourne rags, even if it's only access to a free keywords generator ...


 


The Nine rags also made a little note that will please everyone who's dropped a shekel into the chairman's coffers at some point ...




And so to today's offerings, and it might seem that the pond has made another bad call, what with the valiant Caterist and the noble Killer tilting at Covid in a hive mind chorus ...





Dammit, the pond is going with JC, because he's sticking it to the bloody Catholics ... and there's a cheap snap of the ACU adding to Melbourne's splendid architecture as a way to start off the show ...




What a cruel snap. Why back in the day, when X was a tweet, it was all green and glowing ...





Oh dear, just two likes?

Meanwhile, some meanies might suggest that JC is fallible. Some might suggest JC has a poor memory ... some might remember Dan 'the man' Tehan back in 2020. 






At the time the pond remembers thinking there was no way that the pond would have bothered with an arts degree thanks to Dan 'the man's" pricing strategy ... but what a boon it is not to have a memory ...





At that point the reptiles ran a snap which can safely be downsized ...






That note by JC, "three years later", reminded the pond that it was some three years ago, or to be more precise, back on 19th June 2020 that SBS ran a story by Matt Connellan and Nick Baker, Shock and dismay over 'short-sighted' policy that will double the cost of arts degrees.

The federal government's decision to more than double the cost of studying humanities at university has outraged many. 
Education Minister Dan Tehan on Friday announced a major shake-up of university fees that he said would steer young Australians into degrees that better lead to jobs.
While the cost of "job-relevant" degrees will drop, a three-year humanities degree is set to more than double, from about $20,000 to $43,500.
"I was pretty dismayed and shocked when I heard this news," Australian Academy of Humanities president Joy Damousi told SBS News.
"It came very unexpectedly, there was no consultation with the sector at all about this course of action and why it should be taken."
“[The decision] seems very short-sighted ... It's really disappointing that there is seemingly no recognition that the humanities make a massive contribution to training our future workforce in providing a broader knowledge and a skill set that is fundamental to the progress of our society," she said.
Ms Damousi called the humanities "the engine room of creativity and innovation".
"Many of our leaders, many of our prime ministers, have had arts degrees," she said.
It's a point a number of Australians have been highlighting on social media throughout Friday.
Law Council of Australia president Pauline Wright was also disappointed by the announcement.
"An increase of 113 per cent in fees for an arts degree – often studied in conjunction with law – diminishes the breadth of critical thinking within the student cohort," she said.
"That will flow through to our society, with less people with the valuable analytical skills acquired in arts and arts-law degrees being available to benefit the myriad industries and professions they go on to work in."
She said the value of humanities "cannot and should not be underestimated".
"The humanities teach us about how we live together and interact, whether historically, in the present day or into the future. The humanities enquire about the fundamental questions of what it is to be human."

Short-sighted? Of course not, it's those bloody tykes and their wayward ways ...




Really? Did an alleged emeritus JC scribble that immortal line about Ford?

It’s a tough time for Ford Motor. In addition to undertaking the same electrified and digital transformation as almost every other automaker, it’s having to address quality and reliability issues at the same time—two major undertakings, but the first one cannot happen without the second.
After all, Ford had to post a $2.2 billion loss for 2022 and a good chunk of that can be attributed to $4.17 billion on warranty claims that year alone. (Yes, that’s a lot.) Basically every new Ford vehicle launch in recent years has seen quality issues, costly recalls and upset customers. That’s not what you want when you’re try to roll out a ton of new products, chase Tesla on the EV front and convince buyers and investors alike that you have what it takes to survive long-term. (here)

Fill in the line about Ford CEO Jim Farley hauling in close on US$21 million in 2022 at your leisure ...

And now with the most excellent comedy out of the way, a troubling decision. The pond has decided to hold over the Major to a late afternoon slot, because there's simply no way that the pond can avoid mentioning both the Caterist and the Killer, and by the time that's done the pond will be way over length.

Step forth, Major Mitchell slayer ... quarry waters whisperer Caterist seize your place in the reptile sun ...




It's easy to see why the pond went with the Caterist. That baleful stock snap at the head of the piece, routinely featured by the reptiles in nearly any reptile column about anything, has been mentioned a zillion times by the pond, and yet it keeps on popping up like a poisonous toadstool, as if the reptiles were keen to provide endless evidence that there's no graphics department left at the lizard Oz ...

As for the Caterist content, it's what you'd expect from an expert flood waters in quarries whisperer ...




As usual, the reptiles slipped in snaps of a couple of pollies who didn't actually have the run of the feds in the Covid years ...


 


With those noted for the record, some might wonder about the marvel of a man expert in the movement of flood waters in quarries, but not much else, rabbiting on about the intelligentsia, but that's the wonder of a man with a wretched sociology degree from a provincial university carrying a chip on his shoulder ... the pond can see in mind's eye the Caterist getting a C+ for a paper, and with a glint in eye, determining that there would be payback at some time, no matter how long it took ...

At the same time, be fair, it takes incredible cheek to talk about axiomatic mistakes when you've managed to make a huge defamation payout mistake in relation to your one speciality trick - apart from enduring expertise in climate science denial - which happens to be determining the movement of flood waters in quarries, but that's the joy of being a Caterist ...




The pond is pleased to have survived the Covid years, though it still lurks and caution is advised. The pond isn't so sure about the unhealthy effects of long term exposure to Caterism ... 




The pond has this peculiar notion that death tends to water down consideration of other worldly matters ... you know, "Because I could not stop for death, He kindly stopped for me: The carriage held but just ourselves and immortality."

Well immortality for some Emily, but the pond will have forgotten what the Caterist scribbled by noon this day ...




Ivermectin, get you ivermectin from the Menzies Research Centre, bargain knock down prices for unused stock, get it while its cheap, and your horse will also enjoy the treat ...

And so to Killer and here the challenge is to see if he starts carrying on about masks ... what with his deep Freudian fear of the damn things ...





Nope, not a word about masks in the opening gobbet. Surely Killer will get on to the matter in the next one, because masks have been elevated beyond their natural role by superheroes seeking a disguise ... as if you couldn't spot Batman at Bruce Wayne's stately Wayne Manor ...





Yes, yes, but what about masks? Sorry, the time is right to associate fascist fuzz with Albo ...




Now back to Killer, and he's running out of gobbets for a rant about masks ...




Still no mention of the fascist thought police making people wear masks? The pond was by now seriously worried, it sounded like Killer had buried deep in his psyche the wounds and the scarring from the sight of all those masks in years gone by ... and even more alarming, you can still see them around the malls today, as if Covid hasn't actually gone away, but still lurks, ready to take out the unwary ...




Remarkable. No, up the language to amazing and astonishing. 

A Killer rant about Kovid, and not a single mention of being made to wear masks ...

Mark this day well, it might never come again, and do remember to stock up on Ivermectin and all the best RFK Jr conspiracy theories, featured in a Faux Noise or Sky News after dark channel near you ...

And now time for an immortal Rowe, celebrating the onion muncher's quest for relevance ...






You have to admire the ability to capture the essence of the man ...







14 comments:

  1. "AUKUS consensus collapsing under weight of Labor blunders." Oh look, Bobby Carr is finally preaching from his true home.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good to see he who has been anointed by the Menzies Institute (is that himself?) and Know-it-all extraordinaire, Nick Cater, sticking it to those anointed, right-wing experts! The Hawley-Smoot Tariff Act is believed to have worsened the Depression in America and its instigators were Republicans and the appeaser, Neville Chamberlain, was the leader of the Conservative Party in Britain. As for eugenics, this was not the purview of the intelligensia since infanticide and other practices to eliminate certain genetic types has been around for thousands of years and were practised in certain societies.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ok, so, according to Carroll: "- its teachers and researchers - downgraded to subservience to bureaucrats who, in the main, have no understanding of the dynamics of the seminar room or of the significant research paper, article or book." So, is he saying that either the bureaucrats never attended a university, or that the university bureaucracy is already filled with people who only ever studied 'online'? So when did that happen ?

    But hey, according to Pauline Wright (Law Council of Australia president): "The humanities enquire about the fundamental questions of what it is to be human." Really ? I've never noticed that, have you ? With many hundreds of thousands of 'humanities graduates' in Australia and millions throughout the world doing this 'enquiring' you'd think we might be seeing some positive humanitarian results of all that. Has anybody noticed any ? I certainly haven't.

    But hey, from Carroll: "Imagine Ford executives paying themselves large salaries and building extravagant headquarters while neglecting the quality of the cars coming off their production lines." Well apart from Carroll's view of a university as the same thing as a Ford production line, we don't really have to imagine it, do we. Though I grant that the quality of Ford vehicles is probably somewhat higher than the quality of Uni 'arts' graduates, whether they ever attended a lecture in person or sat in a seminar room or not.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well KillerC may not have mentioned masks, but he did mention QALY: "Second, public health used to be about maximising quality-adjusted years of life remaining, rather than minimising deaths regardless of age." Now personally, I can't remember ever having heard of QALY until it got a run during Covid as those who thought they wouldn't die didn't want to be 'penalised' in favour of those who just might die - and there's millions of them.

    Some numbers:
    Sweden: Cases 2,715,809 Deaths 24,767 Population 10,612,086
    Australia: Cases 11,591,525 Deaths 22,877 Population 26,439,111

    Comparison, Sweden to Australia:
    Population: Sweden is 40% of Australia
    Covid cases: Sweden is 25.5% of population, Australia is 43.8%
    Deaths: Sweden is 0.233% of population, Australia is 0.086% of population.

    So, who did better, Sweden or Australia ? And what does that tell us about "next time" ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And just to complete the numbers:

      Deaths per 1000 cases: Sweden 9.12 Australia 1.97 ie Sweden was 4.63 times as many deaths per 1000 cases as Australia.

      So whose 'experts' should we pay attention to ?

      Delete
    2. :)³ The pond is too lazy these days to do that sort of analysis, but what a relief knowing visitors can attend the comments section and get the numbers. The pond is so over reptile blather about Sweden, and there's the data providing even more reasons to be over it. Much appreciated.

      Delete
    3. My pleasure, DP. Of course the reptiles only go for that very subjective measure QALY as a way of dodging the death rate bullet. Just by assigning some totally unknowable measure of QALY means that one youngish life lost has the same negative value as several older lives lost. The thing is though, that they can only get undiscriminated totals by age group which just gives some kind of meaningless 'average' for the QALY lost in each age group.

      In short, how to just make a simple death count by age group into a proof that provided it's mainly us oldies that die, then a total death count like Sweden's may not be such a tragedy.

      In short, say anything because your 'base' will worship you for it anyway.

      Delete
  5. Oh dear, Dorothy: https://bit.ly/3F800YZ

    ReplyDelete
  6. Have been travelling, but could not let the Cater chatter go unremarked. Clearly red-brick sociology is great training for the forensic talents of good journalism. I had already referred to the Cater offering his interpretation of the proposed ban on gill-netting in northern Queensland, but his blithe substitution of ‘experts’ with what he seems to think is a kind of vox populi, took me again to this interview.

    Background - during the tenure of Numeric Sussan Ley as Minister for the Environment, UNESCO expressed concern for the condition of the Great Barrier Reef. The Sussan gave a masterly demonstration of the negotiating skills that so characterised the Morrison administrations, and persuaded UNESCO to ‘do a study’; hoping for paralysis by analysis. Earlier this year, UNESCO and associate bodies actually delivered their report, with suggestions for action that would help convince the rest of the world that Australia took its responsibility towards the GBR seriously.

    In June (yes, back then) the current federal government put out its response. Among the suggestions that it took up was to steadily remove gill nets from the reef area, mainly because of the serious mortalities of non-target species in those nets. At that time, several arms of Limited News even offered photographs of more charismatic marine life which had been photographed in such nets, or found, dismembered (turtles, hammerhead sharks and other species that are not easily removed from entanglement) on the sea floor.

    More recently, seems our Cater has visited north Queensland, and decided that this was an ISSUE. So he found an amenable commercial fisher and interviewed him. The interview is on ADH tv, but that is not a reason to seek it out. The fishchap gave his version of how it was all over red-rover as of next month (press release differs), there was not a hint of compensation ($160 million in press release) and otherwise did a ‘poor fella me’. He really warmed up when the Cater, being the incisive reporter, asked him what was the ‘science’ behind it all. Here is my best attempt at fish chap verbatim.

    He claims he had written to ‘the 19 scientists who had written the report’, and they ‘came back with ‘the fishery absorbing carbon dioxide. If we stop you from taking the fish they’re gonna hold it in under the water and it’s not gonna go up into the ozone layer, and it’s not gonna go out there and cause climate change and bleach the reef.’

    Cater ‘You’re kidding? That is the best they can come up with?’

    End of cross-examination; Cater apparently satisfied that random fish chap and his 19 imaginary scientists had nailed the issue.

    Not even the earlier snippets on news.com.au had so much as hinted at what the earnest fish chap had uncovered, so full marks to the Cater for drilling down to the facts. None of which emanated from a single ‘expert’.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ooh, I just can't wait for NickC's estimates of sea creature QALY which will convincingly show that not much has really been lost that wouldn't have died anyway.

      Delete
    2. Great comedy, Chadders, and now the Groaner awaits ...

      Delete
  7. Oh dear:

    Alan Kohler: Move to renewables bundles false hope, bad policy and slow progress into giant mess
    https://thenewdaily.com.au/opinion/2023/09/25/renewables-climate-change/

    ReplyDelete
  8. It seems we're not the only people who read Quiggin, Chad.

    What's kept us from full employment is a bad idea that won't die
    http://www.rossgittins.com/2023/09/whats-kept-us-from-full-employment-is.html

    ReplyDelete
  9. GB - thank you for that link to Gittins. I think he has written well, so has done a useful thing in bringing it to, we hope, a wider audience. Is it too much to hope that Gittins will continue to prod suppositions of 'natural' unemployment rates, even if only to remind the Board of the RBA of their 'duty', as set out in the legislation?

    ReplyDelete

Comments older than two days are moderated and there will be a delay in publishing them.