The pond swears it hadn't read the venerable Meade's So long and thanks for all the biffs: Murdoch press may miss the man they called Dictator Dan before compiling yesterday's outing (the pond had predicted the departure of comrade Dan would result in a crisis for the reptile business model).
The pond frequently rips off, or tips the hat, to the venerable Meade, as expert a herpetologist as can be found, but always acknowledges the rip or the tip.
Of course the pond would have quoted the venerable Meade lock, stock and barrel if it had known ...
Many a Herald Sun front page was built around a disdain for Andrews, particularly during the Covid lockdown of Melbourne. But the Labor politician made great tabloid fodder.
Material included everything from a fall down the stairs which broke his back, a car crash involving his wife, to decisions to remove level crossings and allow assisted dying and a safe injecting room. And he cancelled the Commonwealth Games.
The premier’s reputation as “Dictator Dan” hardened during Covid when media critics said his strict lockdowns were ruining the economy and a quarantine bungle gave them ample ammunition. The Herald Sun delivered the verdict “You Failed Victoria” in one headline about hotel quarantine policy in 2020.
The anti-Dan press was not confined to the state of Victoria. Over the border in New South Wales, News Corp’s Daily Telegraph was no fan either. The Sydney paper devoted its front page to Andrews on more than one occasion, with headlines such as “It’s God-Dan disgraceful”, “Dan-made disaster”, “Victoria bitter” and “Bordering on madness”. The Daily Telegraph’s editor Ben English defended his campaign and labelled the premier a “fool”.
There was no greater source of vitriol about Andrews than from Sky News host Peta Credlin, who famously clashed with Andrews at a press conference and later made a “documentary” titled The Cult of Daniel Andrews.
Andrews repeatedly refused to accept her line of questioning, saying: “I’m not going to stand here and have things put to me in an attempt to perhaps have them put to me so often that they become the truth.”
But it didn’t matter what Credlin and her colleagues threw at him, Andrews defied the bad press by winning three elections, convincingly, thereby triggering more irritation and a new nickname – Teflon Dan...
And so on and on, and the Terror chipping in reminded the pond that comrade Dan was just another sign of the war on Victoria.
Despite what might be called the RMIT effect, Melbourne is a civilised town. They have trams, and in the CBD they're free. They love style and black. The one thing that can be held against the small pack of rabid neo-Nazis roaming the streets in approved HUN style is that they refuse to dress in a manner befitting Nazis, who always had a sense of dress ... (take it from Hermann Göring) ...
Never mind, the point is that there's a deep resentment at the way that Victorians manage to get by, and as sure as the venerable Meade mentioned petulant Peta, there she was in the lizard Oz today ...
Brutal reign of madness?
That is, and the pond says it with some understatement, a deeply psychotic headline, with so much resentment beneath, because clearly petulant Peta would have liked to have been a brutally effective political player, but got lumbered with the onion muncher ...
Meanwhile, the venerable Meade was using the reptile compulsive repulsive disorder for another story, Albanese says attacks on Dan Andrews ‘low point in journalism’ as News Corp vitriol continues after resignation.
Andrews’ electoral popularity over nine years was a “cult” and his legacy was nothing but a state “deep in debt”, according to the front pages of two major critics: Murdoch’s Herald Sun and national broadsheet the Australian.
“Dan cult over, bill left behind”, read the Australian front page. “Debt Man Walking”, said the Herald Sun...
And so on and on, rabid attack dogs at play, and yet there's no hope of sanity, with this in the lizard Oz today...
So don't win three elections in a row and thereby send the reptiles into a psychotic fury ...
Meanwhile, the psychosis explosion left the rag bereft ... and the pond short of anything to offer, as if the pond would pay attention to a lesser member of the Kelly gang celebrating Petey boy ...
That was just a footwarmer routine by an old sock for the appearance of Petey boy himself in the commentary section ...
You have to hand it to the reptiles, they drag old dullards of the Petey boy kind out of the woodwork at the drop of a hat, but as a result, the pond simply had no way to do a decent segue to the infallible Pope of the day... heck, no need for a segue, just run it, run it live ...
But after all that, the pond was bereft, because there was only the bromancer ranting in his usual way about the inability of the country to wage war with China by Xmas. At that point, the irony of Wood's reference to "armchair critics" was the best the pond could do for a cosmic joke ...
The last time the pond dipped into the bro, the pond seems to remember Xi and China were on their last legs, tottering about and ready to fall, like a cream puff paper dragon, but today he was back on his old hobby horse ...
But that does give the pond a chance to spend some quality time with the undisguised, unalloyed sexism on parade on the lizard Oz editorial department ...
Ah, those were the days ... and so for a final gobbet of hectoring, and lecturing and admonishing ...
A new sense of possibility and purpose? Jeff Kennett? He was the reason Labor had such a resurgence ...
That'd probably be part of the "Deeming-Kroger Effect", mentioned by a pond correspondent with a sense of humour ...
As for clipping the wings, of course the reptiles want to clip three election wins in a row in the bud, and so the pond was wrong. Dictator Dan might have gone away, say hello to the new Jacinda Adern ...
Ruthless streak!
Usually at this point the pond would end with a cartoon, but again is in urgent need of a segue, and surely the mango Mussolini provides an excuse ...
Strange, is it not, that Editors of reptile publications can serve up continuous, unremitting 'Do Down Dan' content, using specious, contrived, interpretations of events but claiming authority as the body which understands how the public feels, or should feel, except when the public expresses its feelings at the ballot box. Than comes a new Premier, from the same party, and the Editor rolls out their earnest advice and guidance on how the new Premier should administer the state. How could any editor truly believe that such a new Premier would give two minutes' attention to the utter cant of their 'editorial'?
ReplyDeleteWell Chad, I could imagine any sensible incoming Premier using the Oz’s advice as a useful guide to what _not_ to do in office.
DeleteBut of course, Chad, 'Do down Dan' is only the latest of a long line that includes, in more recent years, Whitlam and Gillard (Rudd probably deserved a fair bit of it), and also Kirner and others. Though I grant that the reptiles really have excelled themselves getting stuck into 'Dan's the Man' in the last couple of years.
DeleteSo, is it time to switch to Jacinta Allan now ? Or hype up the attack on Albanese ? Or better still, both.
Well, at least trashing Jacinta Allan will stir their brain cells a little. It's about the only time any thought emerges from the dark empire - negative though it may be. I am still trying to work out how they think this sort of schoolboy petulance is going to actually win some votes, something they are desperately short of in Victoria. It didn't work with Dan, so I guess they just keep banging their heads against brick walls. Suits me. AG.
DeleteWell maybe Do Down Dan isn't entirely undeserved:
DeleteJust how bad is Dan Andrews’ financial legacy?
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/just-how-bad-is-dan-andrews-financial-legacy/ar-AA1hjcKh?
There is so much that could be said about Murdochracy they are the lowest of the low world wide they are an evil force on the politics in countries that they have a presence in and should be held to account for their evilness.There I got that off my chest thank you Dorothy.
ReplyDeleteThing is though, Anony, that the Murdocrats can't do anything without a very large bunch of passionate supporters. And that they have indeed got. Same as Trump.
DeleteNow where do all these passionate idiots come from? How do millions get created, groomed, conditioned and trained every year ? What is so wrong with modern education systems that we can't seem to just teach basic rationality to our children ?
Is that maybe because only a very small percentage of homo saps saps has any rationality at all ?
Oh - and in that fine reptile tradition of rehashing previous 'contributions' - my comments yesterday about Macfarlane and the Statement on the Conduct of Monetary Policy apply equally to the other signatory, Petey Boy. The latter possibly could try the excuse that, to be appointed treasurer. he had not been required to commit the Reserve Bank Act 1959 to memory. That would not have been an acceptable defence if someone had proceeded against Costello and Macfarlane for misfeasance, because their 'statement' may not have been properly ratified by the Board, as set out in the Act.
ReplyDeleteUmm, does this mean that you think that it would be possible to teach the likes of Costello, Howard and Macfarlane some basic sense and knowledge, Chad ? Ok, so how many - and name them - politicians in Australia in the past 50 years have possessed any basic sense and sensibility ? Or is it all just rote learning with little or no understanding ? Rather like that reptile hero of Victoria, Jeff Kennett.
DeleteOnce upon a time, the Public Service could supply some semblance of rationality, but that hasn't been so at least at the Federal level since the Coalition killed the Public Service Board.
GB - in my time as an 'advisor' to administrations of all colours, there was much fun to be had with a change in government, going through the new government's policy statement, and telling new ministers which parts of the policy could not be done under any of Acts that they had just sworn to administer. Some rather blanched when I presented them with bright new copies of said Acts which still applied, even if largely forgotten. South Australia had a funny little one which initially offered the death penalty, later automatically amended (when that penalty was abolished) to life imprisonment, for 'casting down banks or polluting the waters'. It dated from the time of the Russian scare of around 1885, but was still 'on the books' 100 years later.
DeleteThe one time when you did have a minister focus on the specifics of any piece of legislation was coaching them for the second reading of a bill for a new act, but you still had to be ready to write a 6 word response to questions from the other side, on a 'post it', and pass it from the advisor's box to the great one, in the time between when the questioner had sat down and the great one stood up to respond.
In short, no matter how skilled they might be at people and politics, they have little or no skill at governance and governing and very little knowledge of their own country or state or municipality or whatever.
DeleteAnd that is why, bit by bit, it's all falling apart. Keeping this world to under 2.0 (not just 1.5): not a hope in what this place is becoming: hell.
*sigh* - the Bro…. I don’t want to be an apologist for the defence establishment , but in the Bromancer we have a bloke who has never served in the military in any capacity; has never worked in the Defence bureaucracy; has no background in any area of defence-related industries; and, to the best of my knowledge, has any specific technical or academic qualifications of direct relevance to the defence sector. Yet he, and basically he alone, can clearly see what is needed for Australia’s defence. I know that as a fundamentalist Catholic he’s got form in blind fanaticism, but surely he’d be of the view that there’s already been a Messiah?
ReplyDeleteWhile by-and-large I agree with you, Anony, in this case I think the Bro may have a point: what on Planet Terra does the Australia military want with large, heavy, essentially untransportable (by Australia, anyway) tanks. No matter where they would be stationed in Australia, if China (or anybody else) invaded, all they'd have to do is land maybe 500km away from the tanks. Because I don't imagine that distributing them all around the Australian coastline would work, and Tassie would miss out anyway.
DeleteBut those HIMARS ? Well, same thinking: if we site them all up at the top end, what's to stop China's hundreds of naval vessels invading from the south end ? Besides, we'd be banking on Japan, Korea, the USA, Indonesia and the Philippines to keep the Chinese out of our north, wouldn't we.
Yesterday I took an acquaintance for treatment at North Canberra Hospital - until recently managed by the Catholic Church as Calvary Hospital, and the subject of several hysterical articles by the Blessed Saint Angie. I was stunned. Despite what I’d been led to expect by Angie, the walls were not plastered with images of Lenin, Marx, Kim Jong Un and ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr (who surely must have moved up the list of New Corp public enemies with the retirement of Dictator Dan). Staff had not swapped their scrubs for Mao suits. While things took a while, it was no slower than you’d expect in any other Emergency area, the staff were excellent and there was no requirement to spit on the Bible or join the Greens before receiving treatment. Indeed, the Catholic-themed names of some parts of the hospital have not been changed to those of former ACT Labor Ministers, the couple of vaguely Catholic monuments I spotted had not been smashed to rubble, and most surprising of all, I didn’t see any brave groups of Catholic clergy or parishioners loudly protesting against what is now clearly a temple of godless atheism. Is is just barely possible that Sister Angie was slightly exaggerating in her writings?
ReplyDeleteAngie "exaggerating" ? Surely not: no holier than thou lass would ever exaggerate, would she ?
DeleteWhat I always find totally amusing is that after at least 2 millennia the Immortal Trinity's minions still only have at the very most 1/6th (and falling) of the so-called intelligent inhabitants of this planet as nominal "believers".
And somehow the omniscient, omnipresent and, most importantly omnipotent, Trinity can't even keep one small backwoods "Catholic" hospital in Catholic hands and it's now probably performing abortions and enabling self-initiated suicides by the score. And even maybe the occasional sex change. And just maybe that's why the "Catholic faith" is proportionately diminishing.
Noted, and the pond suggests a community campaign to get the staff into Mao clobber ... it's only right and proper ...
DeleteOh pish tush: Americans can't even tell the difference between Biden, Trump, Obama and Clinton:
ReplyDeletehttps://jabberwocking.com/joe-biden-is-as-popular-as-any-former-president/
"Since the Brexit referendum the BBC has become impartial not just between Labour and Tories but between truth and falsehood."
ReplyDeletehttps://stumblingandmumbling.typepad.com/stumbling_and_mumbling/2023/09/against-politics.html
There's just a wee bit of that 'impartiality' going on in Australia too.
How do you know the Bromancer wrote it?
ReplyDeleteCredlin was not able to be AI'd. Too thick.
"I waited for the backlash, expecting people to criticize the publication of an AI-assisted piece of writing. It never came. Instead the essay was adapted for This American Life and anthologized in Best American Essays. It was better received, by far, than anything else I’d ever written.
https://www.wired.com/story/confessions-viral-ai-writer-chatgpt/