The Queen is dead, and so the reptiles were in a top of the digital page frenzy ...
Long live King Chuck III, though the only sign the pond could see of Chuck in the revolving images of doom at the top of the lizard Oz involved a nostalgic family snap out on the lawn ...
But already King Chuck III has been busy ...
It would of course be wrong to blame the death on having to deal with the trussing of the nation, though it must have been a test, and now the monarchist reptiles will have to grit their teeth and celebrate a genuine eccentric on the throne ...
When the first decree involves global warming, what will they do?
Meanwhile, below the fold, the reptiles had failed to keep up, and it was business as usual ...
What a dull and predictable lot, and yet there was a novel twist to the day's proceedings because the reptiles dug out a """ Xian for the daily serve of black bashing, and what a contemptible serve it was ...
Ah dead, and there was the pond thinking of the Tower of Babel ...
Now the whole world had one language and a common speech. As people moved eastward, they found a plain in Shinar[ and settled there.
They said to each other, “Come, let’s make bricks and bake them thoroughly.” They used brick instead of stone, and tar for mortar. Then they said, “Come, let us build ourselves a city, with a tower that reaches to the heavens, so that we may make a name for ourselves; otherwise we will be scattered over the face of the whole earth.”
But the Lord came down to see the city and the tower the people were building. The Lord said, “If as one people speaking the same language they have begun to do this, then nothing they plan to do will be impossible for them. Come, let us go down and confuse their language so they will not understand each other.”
So the Lord scattered them from there over all the earth, and they stopped building the city. That is why it was called Babel—because there the Lord confused the language of the whole world. From there the Lord scattered them over the face of the whole earth.
And sure enough there came an Xian blathering nonsense in tongues, apparently unaware that some of us don't think much of the long absent lord ... as if there's ever going to be any unity between a barking mad fundamentalist and a sensible secularist ...
And then, as if this serve of black bashing wasn't enough, along came a standard bit of nuke worshipping from the bubble-headed booby ...
The reptiles are never going to give up on this one ...
If this is the best the reptiles can do in support of nuking the country, it's on about a par as bringing on a barking mad Xian fundamentalist to do their daily black bashing ...
While on the matter of energy and before turning to our Henry for the final word, the pond couldn't help but note that the lizard Oz editorialist was also harping on the same theme ...
What a disappointment. A classic opportunity to echo the bubble-headed booby lost ... but there'll always be another day to nuke the country and the planet ...
And so to our Henry, and the pond has marked him down to the bottom of the page bonus because the read is as tedious as all get out ...
What a day: The Australian Christian Lobby's Martyn Iles pretending to understand God, Dame Quillette pretending to understand nuclear power and last, and equally least, Hole in the Bucket Henry pretending to understand Industrial Relations.
ReplyDeleteAnd all as Her Brittanic Majesty breathed her last. One of the four great queens of Brittania (other than Boudica): Betty I, Anne, Victoria and Betty II. Will we ever see their likes again ?
And in the meantime will anybody remember what the "modular" bit of SMR was about: that nuclear power stations would be manufactured as assemblable 'modules' that could then be packed up, loaded onto trucks and trains, transported to wherever and then rapidly assembled into a working nuclear fission power unit. Does anybody still think there will ever be anything "modular" about Small Modular Reactors ?
Of fairly recent time, Martyn Iles released a looooong video, discussing 'pride' as a way of bashing everyone who did not meet his, Martyn's, classification of acceptable kinds of gender and personal relationships. Pride, he told us, was just a sin - one of the seven deadlies, as set out for us 'in scripture'. (That revelation came early in Martyn's rant - I cannot think of an inducement that would have me watching the whole dreary droning).
DeleteAnyway, my 'take home' message was - if, for some arcane reason, you might want information on christianity, something called the 'christian lobby' is not likely to provide it. The seven deadlies, like so much that is waved about now, is the result of centuries of old fuds, claiming to have achieved great learning, trying to contort what they could place in the scriptures into catechism, and directions for living, to regiment their particular subset of 'believers' into compliance with the OFs view of what the purpose of human life was.
Of course, give it a century or two, and a new lot of OFs would revise that, with the added entertainment of calling heresy on those who followed the tenets of some previous lot of Fuds.
And here's some really good news to start the day with:
ReplyDelete"Giant ice sheets, ocean currents and permafrost regions may already have passed point of irreversible change."
World on brink of five ‘disastrous’ climate tipping points, study finds
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/sep/08/world-on-brink-five-climate-tipping-points-study-finds
SMRs "could be up and running in Australia in seven years". Why do I immediately think of the Springfield Monorail? https://youtu.be/ZDOI0cq6GZM
ReplyDeleteNo, no Joe, the "SMRs" will be up and running in 7 years, and it will then take another 15 or so years on top of that to bring them into any semblance of operational state.
DeleteThat's what Rolls-Royce are saying: 'SMRs' have been ón the go since 2015 and they might become operational in the mid 2030s. But not a single one of them will be in any way "modular".
I'm waiting for DIY micro-reactors on sale at Ikea by 2030.
DeleteAnd this article links three pond favourites - subs, bromancing, and SMRs!: https://wiseinternational.org/nuclear-monitor/872-873/military-bromance-smrs-support-and-cross-subsidize-uk-nuclear-weapons
Good thinking there, Kez: yes, a truly "modular" reactor should be available in a range of sizes and guises, including a flat-pack version from Ikea. Wouldn't have to get those horrible black things installed on the roof then.
DeleteNow come to think of it, why can't we all install one of these:
Delete"Power was provided by three plutonium dioxide radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) mounted at the end of a boom".
https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/missions/voyager-2/in-depth/#:~
Well maybe in a lead-lined basement instead of on a 'boom', but if it can power the Voyagers for more than 40 years, then why not the average suburban house ?
Happy D-Day to all. 11.20am and I've yet to read a word from John Howard, Tony Abbott or David Flint. By the same token, each moment I don't hear from them will only amplify the tedium when they are eventually let loose.
ReplyDeleteIn the meantime, some are dealing with circumstances better than others: https://twitter.com/laurenthehough/status/1567925670566662145
It seems that, just as self-styled givers of opinion on 'social' matters for the Flagship are required to place the word 'woke' somewhere in their contributions - often, apparently at random - then those who claim to offer economic opinion should sprinkle 'productivity' about their contributions.
ReplyDeleteThat would explain what the Henry has offered this day - a gathering of factoids about how industrial relations are managed in selected countries, with no indication of how any system affects productivity - but claiming inexorable conclusions that one particular system does impede gains in productivity, by inference, more so than the others.
Perhaps it is part of a series, examining each of the countries he mentions in turn to show how their IR systems affect productivity, in the absence of all other social and political factors.
There's just this one big problem with "a gathering of factoids": that any kind of sound empirical evidence, or even basically observant 'lived experience', always tramples on "beliefs". And when it's somebody like Holely Henry gathering the 'factoids' then nothing of any value ever emerges.
DeleteBesides, we didn't even get any testimony from Thucydides on how the Romans and Greeks decided on 'work choices and conditions' or any measure of what their productivity was. But it must have been good - especially the Romans - to build empires like they did - and all those roads and aqueducts and colosseums pantheons and stuff.
We turned to the conservative leader who'd recently led his party to its worst defeat since WW2 to seek his feelings on the passing of the Queen.
ReplyDeleteNo, i'm not kidding, we did.https://twitter.com/RonniSalt/status/1568062671060373504
Maybe we should just have elected "Jen" PM ?
DeleteWas commenting to My Source on the superb Pope for this day, and that Senator Pocock was chastised for referring to Senator Rennick's, um - proclamation about climate as 'bullshit'. That was a simple statement of fact. My Source asked me if I had any idea what Senator Rennick was actually trying to say. Did it resemble anything currently circulating across websites of deniers who have studied some aspects of science at some stage of their careers?
ReplyDeleteI could not bring up all of Senator Rennick's ramblings on 'Y..tube', so may have missed something important, but - I have absolutely no idea even what area of thinking in physics, cosmology or - any branch of science - Rennick was plundering for his supposedly learned proclamation.
This is not a suggestion that anyone else try to decipher Rennick's ramblings, (life is too short, etc) just wondering that people can spout words for which 'bullshit' is an economical, and ample, description; the spouter is in no way chastised, let alone restrained, but the person who identifies it as 'bullshit' is.
Anyway - David Pope - love ya work!
According to Wikipedia, Senator Rennick "claimed that without anthropogenic carbon emissions, phytoplankton would absorb so much carbon from the atmosphere that it would 'destroy our plant life'." Tempted to proclaim that that "is not even bullshit" but I guess it's par for the course for somebody whose academic achievements started with that fine 'degree that is not a degree' Bachelor of Commerce.
DeleteThank you, Anonymous. What did we do before there was the 'Wiki'? I agree with your adaptation of Pauli. Perhaps Senator Pocock could further adapt, so as not to use a word deemed unparliamentary when he tries to categorise the wonderfully stupid theories of Senator Rennick.
DeleteHe could use 'connerie' or perhaps 'foutaise' ?
DeleteOh yes, French always adds that touch of class, and 'foulaise' sounds quite genteel.
Delete'foutaise' it is then ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Delete