For some reason, the pond was reminded this day of the old joke of the unhappy dictator demanding to catch up with the 2% that hadn't voted for him ...
While looking up the old joke, the pond came across this February 2012 piece by Joshua Keating in Foreign Policy, The dicator's dilemma: To win with 95 percent or 99?
Inter alia ...
In today’s world, even the most blatantly undemocratic governments feel the need to hold periodic elections to reaffirm their legitimacy. But I’m always interested by the final numbers in elections where there’s absolutely no question of who will win. The 90 percent mark seems to be a useful line to distinguish between the authoritarian governments that care about the international perception of their elections and want to present the appearance of having an opposition, and those that care only about demonstrating their absolute control to their own citizens.
While neither is a democratic contest, there is a difference — in intended effect at least — between Hosni Mubarak getting 88.6 percent of the vote in 2005 and Bashar al-Assad getting 97.62 percent in a “presidential referendum,” with no opposition candidates, as he did in 2007. Then there’s the 99 percent club, which includes the Castro brothers, and Kim Jong Il. Saddam Hussein went for the full 100 percent in 2002, but then again, he was overthrown a year later. (Why a dictator decides between winning by 97 percent or 99 percent isn’t quite clear.)
In general, when a former 90-percenter start slipping below that mark – as Mubarak did in 2005 — it’s not a good sign for the future of the regime. The Communist Party of the Soviet Union won 100 percent in every legislative election until 1984, when the party, led by General Secretary Konstantin Chernenko, won 71.5 percent, with the rest going to handpicked “independents.” Seven years later the Communists were done.
Today’s Russia is something of a hybrid. In the last legislative elections, the ruling United Russia party took 64.3 percent of the vote nationwide, the kind of number you see in an authoritarian country that feels the need to demonstrate that it has at least a token opposition. (Iran, for instance.) But in Chechnya, United Russia took a Turkmenistan-like 99.48 percent of the vote with 99.5 percent turnout — quite a show of support in a republic that recently saw a bloody nationalist uprising against Moscow.
Cue Vlad the impaler ...
Okay, okay, the pond will 'fess up. It's bored beyond belief by the reptile offerings this day in the comments section of the lizard Oz ...
What is it with that rat from the ranks who hails from the deep north? He's becoming ubiquitous, more cockroach than cane toad ...
So the pond went looking elsewhere and found the predictable in search of the obvious ...
Spend time with the meretricious Merritt doing the reptile obvious? But Wilcox had already taken care of that conversation ...
So the pond went looking elsewhere and stumbled across more of the reptile usual, though with an odd juxtaposition ...
Of late the pond has found visits to planet Janet above the faraway tree increasingly wearisome and tiresome, but this was such an odd juxtaposition that the pond decided to give it a go, and never no mind that the pond has absolutely no interest in Victorian football, or the weird obsessions it provokes ...
Well it's classic planet Janet, everything's always threatening her and the reptiles core beliefs of justice, except perhaps "Lord" Monckton, or donning a MAGA cap, or going all in with fascism ...
But speaking of trial by media and vigilante journalism and open slather, the pond innocently clicked on that other link and magically found itself transported to the HUN, home of Rita "meter maid" Panahi and the Bolter, and so a place the pond never visits ...
The Dog Botherer has joined the chorus of reptiles castigating woke Lefties for their lack of support for Italy’s first female PM. He’s even received a name check from one of the Grudian’s US columnists https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/sep/27/it-is-great-that-little-girls-now-have-role-models-so-they-too-can-grow-up-to-be-crazed-world-leaders
ReplyDeleteThe DB must be overjoyed - another snowflake triggered!
They do so love their fascists …it’s probably time for a feature celebrating the role of aufseherin in concentration camps as a step forward for feminism and female liberation
DeleteThere've always been 'crazed world leaders' that are female. In all the praising of British royalty we don't hear very much of Queen 'Bloody' Mary nowadays. Nor Ekaterina ('Catherine the Great') of Russia. But never mind 'let them eat brioche'.
DeleteLike a movie by Antonioni
DeleteIs the ascension of Giorgia Moroni
But this chick ain't no hoochie
She's a female Il Doochie
With sinister ramificazioni
Ha! Meloni, not Moroni...I've got a subversive spellchecker. She's either a moron or a melon, take your pick.
DeleteBoth, Kez ? But at least she isn't a Morosi.
DeleteNot to mention that bloody Boudica aka Boadicea, or that strumpet Cleopatra, or, though not a queen, still bloody uppity, that Jeanne d'Arc, ruining things for little England, as the French are wont to do ...
DeleteAnd don't forget Emma of Normandy, "the Formidable Queen who steered England through the Viking Age" and like Duke Guillaume and Duke Richard, she too was a Viking.
Deletehttps://allthatsinteresting.com/emma-of-normandy
I think of Ms Panahi with the post-nominals SOW - no, nothing piggishly disrespectful, but standing for Simple, Obvious and Wrong. Her stock in trade is, for every complex problem, to offer - nay, promote - a solution that is Simple, Obvious and Wrong; but I guess that works best with the sad souls who look up to the Sky broadcasts for information, or, perhaps, guidance.
ReplyDeleteIt's truly an art being so completely wrong all of the time, not even right once in a lifetime just by sheer fluke.
DeleteSlappy: "Not all companies, bureaucracies, unions, universities, medical bodies or sporting clubs believe in the presumption of innocence or due process either." And how many of them have ever believed a woman over the years ? It's clear that Dame Slap expects to be believed for all the totally evidence and due process free crud that she pushes.
ReplyDeleteLike, for instance: "But a new form of injustice ... is committed every time we discard values to which we have long adhered to best protect the innocent ..." Yeah, but it's those long established "values" of belittling or just plain ignoring years and years of genuine female complaints in order to protect the guilty that Slappy seems to be completely blind to. Now why is that ? Apart from her personal devotion to blind stupidity, that is.
Such as "finding a sensible balance relies on enough people believing that protecting the innocent is a foundational feature ... of a fair and just society." Right, but unless the complaints and charges are actually brought out into the light of day, they are simply ignored. Thousands of cases of complaints by women simply put into the pidgeon hole and then completely ignored. And without any 'due process' Slappy would nonetheless have us believe that they are all "innocent" anyway.
But then: "Media trials are the antithesis of that sort of [fair and just] society." Umm, is that also a bit of a go at the National Anti-Corruption Commission ? Echoing Mutt the Dutt about 'show trials' perhaps ?
Thank heavens we have the Reptiles to warn us of the dangers of trial by media.
DeleteIndeed they do have many years of dedicated experience in pursuing it.
DeleteFunny that notion of Slappy's of "protecting the innocent" is nothing like "protecting the vulnerable", to which it sounds so similar. Her blind justice is just willfully blind injustice.
Delete"The far-right Brothers of Italy party has suspended an election candidate after it was discovered he had praised Adolf Hitler and described the group’s leader, Giorgia Meloni, as a 'modern fascist'."
ReplyDeleteOk, it's all right that she is fascist just so long as you don't call her one. That's genuine reptilism for us.
Very simple indeed: "The simple point about climate change is that both action and inaction get more costly every year."
ReplyDeletehttps://www.eschatonblog.com/2022/09/hurricane.html