The pond must begin today with an abject apology. Yesterday the pond had no intention in assisting the undermining of national security - it had merely thought it was regurgitating the thoughts of a kinder, gentler, more sensitive, deeply aware politician, much changed since his time as a plod ... but given the depths of News Corp's involvement in treason and undemocratic coups of the US kind, the pond should have known better.
It's true that the history of US submarine acquisitions under the coalition were an unparalleled success. To alienate the Japanese and French defence establishments were masterstrokes, but now the pond finds itself involved in consternation emanating from diplomatic, military and academic circles ... with the United States bewildered and bemused, and the UK's nose out of joint ...
As a result the pond, albeit in a minor way, has contributed to the latest coalition triumph, by freeing the mutton Dutton's thoughts from the paywall, though the heaviest burden must surely still belong to him and the reptiles ...
2GB? Let's not distract from the lizard Oz's front page splash, the mutton Dutton's opinion piece for the rag and a slavering lizard Oz editorialist ...
Oh indeed, indeed, who would indulge in cheap political pointscoring when national security is involved ... now back to the sensitive skill of the much changed mutton Dutton ...
Dammit, damn them all, the lizard Oz editorialist was wildly excited ...
There's no doubt that two subs would make all the difference in confronting dictator Xi, and purloining US kit would help the cause, and so breaching national security makes eminent sense ... if you happen to be a reptile trying to help the mutton Dutton show what a sensitive, intelligent, deeply changed plod he is ...
Sadly, as a result of the pond's involvement in this national security breach, the bromancer has had to be held over to a late afternoon slot - he brings the good news that all is well with the US.
Instead there's just room to squeeze in Lloydie of the Amazon, and the usual piece by our Henry, a man deeply interested in protecting boondoggling, corruption, rorting, favouritism, pork barrelling, perquisites, payola and plum political patronage ...
First to Lloydie, sorting out the pond's correspondents with a what's what on climate science ... with an astonishingly original snap at the start of proceedings ...
Ah, the usual: "the catastrophisation narrative of a climate emergency", when good old Lloydie has a serve of sweet nuclear fusion in the sweet bye and bye, which will save us all ...
The pond had only a minor difficulty in swallowing this guff whole ... roughly equivalent to swallowing a nuclear sub from the mutton Dutton. If the whole thing, climate science and all that jazz, is a nonsense, and an exaggeration and hysteria, why should anyone give a flying fuck that Lloydie's solutions might just work sometime by the year 2100? What's the problem we're trying to solve here? Let's just get back to burning coal, and everything will be fine ... it goes without saying you can trust the reptiles on matters of national security ...
Stumped by these irreconcilable thoughts, the pond moved on to a final offering, the defence of rorting, as ably conducted by the hole in the bucket man, with reference to Aristotle, the Bible, Aquinas and such like to give the defence a splendid sheen ... because a rort's not a rort when it's been properly tithed and given to your favourite fuck ...
Indeed, indeed, thank the long absent lord that we have the hole in the bucket man to hand to stand up for truth, justice, and the right to splash cash on your favourite fuck.
That way you get to enjoy the fuck, fuck the electorate, fuck the country, and dress it up with pious blather about Aristotle, Xian theologians, and all the other bullshit for which our Henry is famous in his own lunchtime ... err, that meal will be going on our Henry's tab, won't it? It's one thing to get bored batshit during a luncheon with our Henry, quite another to have to lash out on the delicious pork ...
And with all that, an epic day for the pond surely, the pond must squeeze in the Rowe of the day, with more Rowe here ... with fragrant echoes of Lloydie of the Amazon ...
The Oz's Mr Ed: "If successful, the plan outlined by Mr Dutton would eliminate the dangerous capability gap following the retirement of the Collins-class submarines from 2038." Oh sure, right, 2 nuke subs we can't operate or support that we will get in about 10+ years time will fully replace the 6 Collins-class subs that can barely put to sea now anyway. Yep, that's sheer reptile genius all right.
ReplyDeleteSo much baloney GB it's hard to know where to start
ReplyDeleteLLOYD: process heat, something wind and solar can never deliver.
and
PATERSON: Carbon-free process heat is a much bigger problem than electricity
If only we could make process heat with electricity
For what is being developed and delivered in the way of powering planes, boats, locomotives try
https://www.greencarcongress.com/
PATERSON: when you take the baseload out the costs go up.
I think technically this is a furphy.
Coal-fired stations need base load to avoid having to shut-down due to low-demand
Currently high demand means we need to run gas-fired peaking stations with gas price
being the international spot price because we didn't contract and store our gas
PATERSON: the universal law of economics is that it does not trump physics
We had a unit of economics in second year Engineering and it dealt with the economics of
hydro vs coal-fired generation. There was never any mention of economics in Physics
LLOYD: Paterson, who has commercialised pioneering research on lithium ion batteries
So that he now leads a world class lithium battery manufacturer doesn't he
Australia is situated similarly to Ukraine against any super-power. Asymmetry means drones
against battleships, quad bikes against tanks, lots of small against a few huge
Missile-launching submarines are for nuclear super-powers in their MAD strategy and as
useful to our defense as tanks and battleships
The ideal undetectable submarine is cold and silent - indistinguishable from a fish.
We would be better to quietly build submersibles like Turkey built drones
Maybe there's "no mention of economics in physics": all those wonderful technologies that we will invent and perfect in no time at all ... well, in nearly a century, anyway.
Delete"[Paterson] said it was important to have an intergenerational view ... in the next century, I believe, if we just take iff the false time problem, we will be looking for the highest density of energy we can get, and at the top of that pile is nuclear fusion." Where do we get these daydream believers from, and why do we employ them.
We haven't got time to wait for "the next century". That's just short of 80 years away and we're already copping the bad stuff right now. And ut won;y go away for a very long time unless we can perfect another dreamtime technology: large scale capture and removal of CO2 from the world's atmosphere.
I've seen a few articles recently regarding this subject
Deletehttps://nsc.crawford.anu.edu.au/publication/16666/transparent-oceans-coming-ssbn-counter-detection-task-may-be-insuperable
"The evolution of counter-detection technologies will not have the same salience in the 2050s as it did in earlier times. As a result, by the 2050s, this assessment shows, progress in counter-detection will only reduce the probability of detection from very likely to likely."
I have no idea how these technologies will pan out but if you intend to spend billions on a very small number of assets you would definitely have to consider the possibility that you are buying the new dreadnought.
The other question is "why do they only consider China?" Sure, China is a problem but it's only one of many scenarios and the one we would have the least chance of dealing with. What about regional instability caused by climate change?
https://thediplomat.com/2020/01/climate-change-brings-geopolitical-complications-for-australia/
What about the past hysteria about the Indonesians - or depending how long you want to go back the French or the Russians (the guns installed in Darwin sure put them off). Apparently the Japanese weren't a threat until they were - says something about arrogance and putting too much faith in an ally.
"intend to spend", Bef ? We've already wasted many $billions on non-oceangoing tanks, useless F35s, under-performing frigates and LHD ships that can't even keep their engines running. How much more do we want to waste ?
DeleteHolely Henry: "...power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely." Yes, we've noticed; but then has anyone noticed how much the absolute absence of power also corrupts ? Where do revolutions come from ? Not from the powerful enjoying their power of grift, do they.
ReplyDeleteBesides, if "power corrupts" then anyone with any power at all is corrupt, and what are we democratic electors supposed to do about that ? Anybody else we elect to replace the corrupt immediately gains power and becomes corrupt too, yes ? A never ending cycle of corruption being replaced by corruption. But I wouldn't expect the Holely to have the wit to have ever noticed that. I wonder if Lord Acton did.
I was going to leave Our Henry's ramblings to those who can still read them with awe, but it came to me that when he wrote of a separation of action on corruption and malfeasance, he might have mentioned the other tort - of nonfeasance. Malfeasance requires a state of mind in the perpetrator; essentially a proven intention to do harm to another. Nonfeasance is simply - not doing your job, often because - well, it's inconvenient, or it will stir up opposition (including by mass media organisations). It is widespread, acts against the interests of so much of the populace - and you will have to look very hard to find actual cases. To initiate a case, one or a group of citizens would have to raise funds and commit to a very long time briefing lawyers, and attending hearings, and (Pareto's Principle) even if they were to win, the benefit to them of getting a Minister to apply an Act which he or she had solemnly sworn to administer, could well be way less than the cost to them in time and money.
ReplyDeleteThere have been cases carried through by bodies such as the Sierra Club in the USA, to require governments to apply environmental law, which are essentially about nonfeasance, but a book on significant cases involving nonfeasance, under the British/Australian legal systems, would be a slim volume.
But, when pressed, people currently claiming to be 'conservative', will write as the Henry does, to tell us how the steady grind of civil law has given us circumstances that absolutely do not require one smidge more of statute to improve our paradise on earth.
A book listing actual legal cases against nonfeasance might indeed be very slim, Chad, but what about one listing all the instances of nonfeasance. And what is the percentage of intentional nonfeasance versus ignorant or just plain incompetent nonfeasance.
DeleteI think Australian governments - especially of the past 9 or so years - have been "guilty" of many cases from all causes.
Oh my:
Delete"Richard Nixon was elected in 1968 and re-elected in 1972, but he was forced to resign halfway through his second term for malfeasance, misfeasance, nonfeasance, unfeasance, afeasance and five o'clock shadow."
https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/bs-xpm-1992-10-29-1992303002-story.html
Yair, that 'five o'clock shadow' is a killer, ennit.
Oh - and Lloydie - I guess con-fusion pretty much covers it.
ReplyDeleteAnd there's some excellent British nonfeasance well described in Saturday's Marina Hyde:
ReplyDeleteMinisters want Britain to be more like Netflix: debt-ridden and fast losing fans
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jun/10/britain-netflix-debt-government-streaming-service
GB - Dorothy has warned us that what the Flagship carries these days is dispirited, tedious, careless page filler, but it does give us odd themes to play with, and exchange gems from other sources - as you have done with the Nixon and Netflix. Thank you. That spirit still distinguishes this site from most others - although Tony Windsor's twitter site does show what that app. could be capable off, if users approached it with open minds, and a touch of grace.
ReplyDelete