Thursday, January 21, 2021

In which the pond ferrets through the lizard Oz for morsels of irony ...

 


 

Luckily the condition does pass ... the pond has occasionally discovered it read something in the lizard Oz that amazingly, remarkably, astonishingly, it agreed with ...

But usually the pond finds itself in a condition of bemused irony, and today, in the absence of heavy hitters of the savvy Savva or the bromancer kind, the pond decided to search out the morsels of irony on hand, and first up was the lizard Oz editorialist ...

 

 

The rich irony here of course is that the home of Fox and Friends, Fox News, the Murdochian tabloids in the US and here, and the lizard Oz should give a flying fuck about civics ...the only serious question is whether it's irony, or gothic grotesque ... 

To help prove that it was distilled essence of irony, the lizard Oz editorialist saved the best irony for a final gobbet, and inevitably it featured climate science ...


 

 

Yes, beware of talking or thinking or learning about the fate of planet, young folk ... which naturally led the pond into another bit of rich irony, with two stories juxtaposed side by side ...

 

 
 
Hmm, how to explain that away, given the cult of dinkum clean pure Oz coal at the lizard Oz?
 
Well, good old Nick gives it his best shot ...
 
 

 
Go on Nick, we know the real problem here, it's all BHP's fault, it's BHP wot done it ...

 

 

Yes, yes, it's all BHP's fault, the pond knew it ... you see vulgar youff, no need to think about the fate of the planet when you have the reptiles to guide you ...

And speaking of that tone setting irony, the lizard Oz editorial on civics, there was another irony to hand, featuring, as might be expected the Donald ...

 

 


 

Fortunately, it's not long and the irony comes quickly in this one...

 


Beware partisan echo chambers? 

Oh that's so astonishingly rich to see in the lizard Oz, and best of all it comes amidst recent reports of doings in reptile world ... with Yahoo pillaging the Daily Beast to produce... Fox News Launches 'Purge' to 'Get Rid of Real Journalists,' Insiders Say...

... Even before this round of layoffs, Berry’s management and editorial style had resulted in the departures of several key employees, such as Jason Ehrich, former executive vice president of audience development and strategic partnerships, and Greg Wilson, the former managing editor of the Fox News website, among others.
As The Daily Beast reported, Berry’s influence over the network’s online properties has raised eyebrows among staffers, largely because he continues to act as a “shadow executive producer” for Hannity—yet another sign of the increasingly blurred lines at Fox between the network’s right-wing opinion commentary and its so-called news division.
The ouster of Stirewalt came months after he publicly defended the Fox decision desk’s early (and accurate) election-night projection of Joe Biden winning Arizona’s votes. The on-air call immediately infuriated President Donald Trump, as such a projection by his then-favorite network inhibited his plans to prematurely declare victory that evening. “Jared, you call the Murdochs! Jason, you call Sammon and Hemmer!” Axios reported Trump shouting that night at his son-in-law Jared Kushner and top adviser Jason Miller.
Immediately following the Arizona call, which has been linked to angry Trump fans abandoning the network for even more fact-free, right-wing outlets like Newsmax, Stirewalt was repeatedly grilled on-air over the projection and asked whether his team would reverse its call. “Not that I see,” Stirewalt said, standing by decision desk director Arnon Mishkin’s analysis.
Shepard Smith: I Don’t Know How Some Fox News Hosts ‘Sleep at Night’
While the network’s pro-Trump opinion hosts openly undermined the decision desk and political team’s Arizona call, parroting the Trump campaign’s complaints, Stirewalt refused to reverse course while also throwing cold water on the president’s bogus claims of widespread voter fraud.

And while we're into the irony of the current state of the cult and partisan echo chambers, why not read at the Daily Beast Hannity's Crony Has Taken Over Fox News Digital - and It's a Disaster, Staffers Say … currently outside the paywall.

And so is that Shep Smith story about sleeping at night...

Ah sweet Murdochian cult ironies, and so to the final short gobbet ...


 

 

The pond appreciates irony isn't to everyone's taste, and so the irony of advice to stand up to Murdochian bullies might not be enjoyed by some ...

Here have a cartoon, and just enjoy the monsters and the wild things ...

 


 

Stupidity is more to some people's taste, and luckily the reptiles also had the Switzer on hand this day ...



 

The good thing is that the swishing Switzer has nothing much to say, and so spends only a short time saying it, but as well as offering nuggets to stupidity hunters, irony searchers will be rewarded as well ...


 

There you go ... "not unlike Barack Obama" ... what a natural comparison and what a charming piece, as revisionism cranks into gear ...

And the pond did enjoy Switzer's despair, which the pond roughly understood to say ... "how the US gets one of the world's largest coal suppliers, Australia, still heavily dependent on domestic foreign fuels, to decarbonise its economy (and hurt its economy) is unclear", because who would harm a hair of dear sweet dinkum coal, and who would talk of the economic possibilities of a green, sustainable economy?

It's simply not the reptile way ... and so for a final bout of gibberish in the new ABC way ...




 

Not to worry. SloMo is still infatuated with the Donald, so everything's hunky dory, and the reptiles' war on China is going exceedingly well ...

Here, have a cartoon about an organisation which strangely isn't much mentioned by the reptiles these days ...

 


 

 And so to wrap up the ironies with a story that ran yesterday, and indicates the deep fear that all isn't going well with the reptiles' favourite campaign ...



It's pretty feeble stuff, especially given the way that this story appeared in the Graudian here ...

The inventor of the world wide web says proposed Australian media laws requiring tech giants Google and Facebook to pay for displaying news content risks setting a precedent that “could make the web unworkable around the world”.
Tim Berners-Lee, who invented the world wide web in 1989, said the draft legislation “risks breaching a fundamental principle of the web by requiring payment for linking between certain content online”.
In a submission to an Australian Senate inquiry on the News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code bill, Berners-Lee said the ability of web users to link to other sites was “fundamental to the web”.
Requiring digital platforms to pay to host that link, a world-first provision of the proposed Australian laws, would “block an important aspect of the value of web content”, the computer scientist said.
Berners-Lee argued the proposal “would undermine the fundamental principle of the ability to link freely on the web and is inconsistent with how the web has been able to operate over the past three decades”.
“If this precedent were followed elsewhere it could make the web unworkable around the world,” he said. “I therefore respectfully urge the committee to remove this mechanism from the code.”
 

Yes, there's the rub, and the story ended this way ...

…Google said the proposed code “remains unworkable”, saying that forcing Google to pay for links and snippets that appear in Google Search “would break the way search engines and the internet work for everyone”.
It said results in its search engine should be exempt from the code. Google said it would work out commercial agreements with publishers to appear in its Google News Showcase service – which it was already doing.
It also said the arbitration provisions were skewed toward media companies and should be replaced by a standard commercial arbitration mechanism.
Twitter, which would not be subject to the code, said the proposed regulatory regime lacked transparency and risked entrenching “dominant players at the expense of smaller digital platforms” if news outlets choose to funnel all their content through platforms that paid them for content.

 Meanwhile, the reptiles carried on with their domestic, house-trained loon ...



 

 Of course the survey was just a distraction, a pathetic ploy in a war between big tech and fading, aged old media, hanging on by fingernails behind a paywall ... because that's all you get when you click on a Murdochian link, a bloody big paywall and an invitation to pour cash into Murdochian coffers, so you can indulge in the ironies of a civics lesson, or talk of climate science, or BHP ruining coal, or the importance of not paying attention to the Murdochians and their cult if you want to retain any sanity ... you know ...




Never mind, remove the echo chamber from Google and all will be well ...



Wouldn't it be more honest to say that news publishers of the News Corp kind are broadly supportive of cash in the paw, because the current failing business model keeps flailing around, as partisan echo chambers are wont to do when their hero has left the room, indeed, the building ... and for that, the pond only needs to turn to the immortal Rowe for a final irony, with the pond still able to link to Rowe here ...




10 comments:

  1. Cold cuts anyone?

    https://twitter.com/GretaThunberg/status/1351890941087522820?s=20

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What did she say about her "superpower" again ?

      Delete
    2. Now that's fun, and the pond was pleased at the reward for following the link, though it felt more spicy than a cold cut

      Delete
  2. Hmm, how to explain that away and cancel the oz cult-ture?

    "There’s No Such Thing as Cancel Culture

    Social norms are a never-ending contest

    "The collective and unwavering moral scorn of a libertine society that has been pushed to the limits of its tolerance—censure from a crowd more inclined to give power-players a pass—is a fearsome thing for people who commit foul deeds behind a façade of social respectability.

    "It is, in fact, what they fear the most.

    "There is no such thing as “cancel culture” — there is only culture."

    https://arcdigital.media/theres-no-such-thing-as-cancel-culture-887472db70b2

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This pulls together a number of threads you can see in the current reptile tropes.

      "This is why so many of the critics of “cancel culture” are also defenders of “culture” or “the Western canon” as a static set of texts and tastes"

      "If culture is not something permanently enshrined, then neither are they. Society might revise its view of them and all they advocate or represent."

      On a side note, this seems to be the base cause of the panic among the conservatives (maybe reactionaries is more appropriate) about Covid restrictions. If you can shut down part of the economy for the common good maybe the market isn't the god-like entity that solves all problems. It sort of pulls the rug out from under neoliberalism in that the market is just a tool serving society, not the other way around.

      Delete
    2. L.D. Burnett: "There is no such thing as cancel culture."

      Maybe not, but there sure is a thing that's 'culcha cancel' - decrying all those poofters and pretenders who claim that they love the yartz and such. Enjoying ballet ? Never, ever, you pussy playboy (or girl) you !

      But I do have to wonder how far this "no cancel culture" claim can go. So some like to praise pedophilia, and not only praise it but practise it. So are we to tell ourselves that that's just 'culture' so kindly show it some respect.

      Delete
    3. Maybe I'm missing the point (I often do) but I would have though paedophilia was a good example of what she is talking about. No need to deplatform PIE or whatever it goes by nowadays, no one outside the dark web would consider dealing with them in the first place.

      Would be an interesting question for the 'free speech' champions I would think.

      Delete
    4. Just wondering how far this "everything is culture" idea goes. As far as I can see, at least part of every single human culture has always been to 'cancel' the things they don't like. You don't like 'Lady Chatterley's Lover' ? Ok then cancel it. You don't like 'heresy' ? Ok, then cancel it, and cancel the people who do it.

      So tell me, how does the question of 'free speech' - ie the determination of whether to cancel something or not - not be a part of the question of 'cancel culture' ?

      Personally, I'm all in favour of 'cancel culture' and I'd apply it to most reptile/wingnut thought and speech forthwith. Or what would your choice be to do about, for instance, the Spanish Inquisition ? Or maybe just Arbeit macht frei ? They're just 'culture' aren't they ? Wouldn't want to cancel them, then.

      Delete
    5. Probably expressed myself badly there. More than happy to cancel kiddie-fiddlers, liars and grifters but I don't think that's what's meant by 'cancel culture'. In wingnut speak its just the noise they make when there is a consequence for their actions.

      If a company wants to avoid brand damage by disassociating themselves from an individual or the authorities want to prevent racial vilification by taking legal action it's not cancel culture it's just the normal functioning of a society.

      It's really just wingnut speech which isn't always intelligible to the rest of us.

      Delete
    6. I reckon it's just the standard wingnut tactic of 'weaponising' anything they can against us evil "lefties". So they try to turn a very long-standing practice of their own into something to beat "us" with. I'm just happy to accept the charge of "cancel culture" and to keep on using it against them in both senses - cancelling them and accusing them of 'cancel culture' too.

      A bit like Greta has used Trump's "weapon of trivialisation" against him very successfully.

      Delete

Comments older than two days are moderated and there will be a delay in publishing them.