Thursday, July 02, 2020

In which the pond forgot to add a header ...

Frankly the pond thought that Scottie from marketing went a little too far in comparing Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler.

If comparisons had to be made, then surely the obvious one was with Benito Mussolini, who was himself something of a bones spur and chicken hawk man …and who had to keep getting bailed out by Adolf.

Really, when it comes to the crunch, SloMo and dinkum Aussies are just the right sort to bail out the Donald, just like Adolf kept on doing with Benito ...

Say what? The pond misheard, and missed the point entirely?

Then there's only one solution, call out our most battle-hardened warrior, the man who fought them on the beaches in Camperdown and had his campus feats celebrated in Honi Soit, the man who would have joined the army to fight the Commie swine only to have the siren song of becoming a reptile see him diverge to scribble away …



Hmm, before proceeding, did anyone suggest that perhaps the best way to imitate the 1930s would be for Scottie from marketing to superintend the supply of coal and iron ore to China? 

Like Ming the Merciless sending that infamous scrap iron to Japan just before the war? At least then he could carry a good nickname to the grave, like Iron ore pig iron Scottie or Coal-faced SloMo …

Sorry, the pond's just dilly-dallying, we must plunge into war …


The circumstances we confront? Hush, please, no one mention the Murdochians or the Donald or Vlad the impaler …


Back to the battlefield, and the foundation of our security ...


The US is confused? Surely not …


Back to inept comparisons, and shoehorning history into fear-mongering of an apocalyptic kind, because, you know, there's a by-election just around the corner, and it's going to be close ...


Trust luck when you can trust the Donald?

But as usual the infallible Pope had a way of summarising the SloMo ploy …


And that reminded the pond that late yesterday the reptiles were still flogging that book ...


A new religion? Talk of alarmists? Well it's a desperate way to sell a book, but damned if a fervent atheist is going to bother with that sort of talk, the sort of childish crap that's emanated from reptile climate denialists for aeons … and now deployed just to keep on selling books …

What else? Well, as we've started to speak of science, albeit in the usual reptile theological way, one of the craven Cravens was out and about, and scoring the illustration of the day ...


Criticism of Andrews has been muted, and wisely so, because just like climate science, the virus doesn't much care for politics or religion, it just goes on doing what it does, and fools who think otherwise might end up sounding like that clown, Governor DeSantis, who recently featured in a viral video ...


That was in the NY Post of all places - warning, it's a Murdoch rag and you might catch a climate denialist virus, or a religion, so please excuse the pond as it must get back to the battlefield with another reptile favourite ...


Actually we're sliding towards a by-election, so the verbiage must flow, but if it's war, perhaps a pre-emptive strike on Samoa or Fiji or Vanuatu? The Donald, brave warrior that he is, will surely have our backs …


Sheesh, another great pond idea shot down in flames, but luckily we haven't had to worry about anything since the Battle of Midway, which was a much more significant battle than the Battle of the Coral Sea … unless of course it was millions of Commie Chinese swine pouring down south to join forces with the wretched Commie Vietnamese, and send dominoes tumbling down everywhere, and next thing you know it, we'd be eating sushi with chopsticks and waving in the air a little red book written by the Dirty Digger …and the only way to limit the conflict was to bomb Cambodia, and didn't that work out well?

Oh well, it's true that the pond has a Molesworth sense of history, do go on ...


Stupidly, the pond went away and read up on the Japanese Army's Pacific war plans and copped a load of wiki-itis:

In early 1942 elements of the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) proposed an invasion of Australia. This proposal was opposed by the Imperial Japanese Army and Prime Minister Hideki Tojo, who regarded it as being unfeasible given Australia's geography and the strength of the Allied defences. Instead, the Japanese military adopted a strategy of isolating Australia from the United States by advancing through the South Pacific. This offensive was abandoned following the Battle of the Coral Sea and Battle of Midway in May and June 1942, and all subsequent Japanese operations in the vicinity of Australia were undertaken to slow the advance of Allied forces.
Former Australian War Memorial principal historian Dr Peter Stanley states the Japanese "army dismissed the idea as 'gibberish', knowing that troops sent further south would weaken Japan in China and in Manchuria against a Soviet threat. Not only did the Japanese army condemn the plan, but the navy general staff also deprecated it, unable to spare the million tonnes of shipping the invasion would have consumed."[2]
In Australia, the government, the military and the people were deeply alarmed after the fall of Singapore in February 1942 about the possibility of a Japanese invasion. Although Japan never actually planned to invade Australia, widespread fear led to an expansion of Australia's military and war economy, as well as closer links with the United States.

Yep, it must be by-election time.

How about a couple of reassuring cartoons celebrating our closer links?



And so, only because it's a matter of Thursday habit, to the savvy Savva, and those local issues, and the reptiles in a dire state of panic and alarm, such that the Savva was elevated to the top of the page, to counteract the dreadful, baleful Barilaro ...


Actually the way that the reptiles were carrying on, it looked like them and SloMo had the most to fear from an Eden-Monario fail, as a lot of pundits seemed to think that, what with the scare mongering and the comparisons to Adolf's times and the virus and comrade Dan's misfortunes, the seat should be low-hanging fruit easily plucked from Labor's grasp, as was done the last time a seat was up for grabs during a pandemic ...


… but what would the pond know, which is why it always calls on the reptiles for help ...


Ah, the pond gets it. The reptiles constructed an entirely artificial headline and stuck it on the top of the savvy Savva's piece, entirely misrepresenting the warp and weave of its contents. A standard reptile manoeuvre …


Please go on, savvy Savva, seize the apocalyptic moment and explain why it will be an epic fail, with seismic, shattering implications for anyone caught nearby ...


With the greatest respect, it has always been thus, with reptiles using their golden egg-beaters to batter up by-election results as being crucial … when right at the moment, there's a pandemic doing the rounds, and people tend to be more worried about jobs and death and the whole damn thing, and likely enough the way that, come September, SloMo will use a by-election victory to punish people for being unable to get a job ...


Luckily the pond fears nothing, not the virus, not the Chinese, not the war footing, not Adolf, because we have the Donald, and as the immortal Rowe has noted, he's a fearsome golfer, adept at mulligans and other tricks … (and more golfing with Rowe here).



12 comments:

  1. Promoting informed, incisive debate on the national economic issues -

    in AFR today, article from Dr. Adrian Blundell-Wignall, who is often cited in the economics trade for work published when he was with OECD, amongst others.

    ‘Let’s start with the obvious: what lies in the ground and in the oceans around Australia is the birthright of every Australian.’

    - which was his prelude to discussing why those Australians have seen so much less birthright than, say, the Norwegians, or even the Qataris (who ‘Wikipedia’ credits with the highest per-capita income in the world - from gas royalties)


    This attracted the usual scorn from the self-styled ‘Libertarians’ on ‘Catallaxy, including comment (which I have not corrected) from

    Judith Sloan
    #3501210, posted on July 2, 2020 at 6:41 am
    Just an opionated rant. I don’t take any notice of him anymore.


    Chadwick

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well she's right, isn't she ? "Birthright" is an arbitrary construct just like "fiat money". Now nobody, and especially not Dame Groan, actually believes in "fiat money", deep down where it counts they still believe that 'money' has a completely independent existence (it will still be around, in the form of gold, long after homo sapiens sapiens is totally and finally defunct) which is why noodlenuts like Killer can proclaim that it's all ours before the government takes it from us.

      But apart from that, I rather hope that at least some of what's underground or undersea (eg gas, coal etc) remains the "birthright" of those parts of the planetary crust that it's buried in.

      Delete
    2. Hi C,

      I don’t think the fabulously wealthy but famously parsimonious J. Paul Getty would have agreed with your Dr. Blundell-Wignall, as his famous dictum was;

      “The meek shall inherit the earth, but not it’s mineral rights.”

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Paul_Getty

      DW

      Delete
    3. DW - your 'Hi C' greeting gave me a smile - but it is a bit beyond my vocal range. Thank you also for recalling the Getty quote, which has a couple of entendres, and is really quite clever in its way.

      One of the deeply interesting themes in economic history is how resources and innovations are developed or captured by individuals, then rent-seekers see the possibility of capitalising the future chain of resource rents from whatever the innovation is, persuade a compliant government to create a property right in whatever innovation or resource, and, of course, vest those rights, usually at no real charge, in the rent-seekers, in the name of - well, currently, 'jobs and growth'.

      Cesare Marchetti, 35 years ago, was trying to draw our attention to some of this; interestingly, at that time, his best guess was that around now, one 'big thing' in world trade would be natural gas. His influence might be gauged by his not having a personal entry in 'Wikipedia'; a f a i k, he is cited only for 'Marchetti's constant' (which he always credited to a colleague) that the average time a person is prepared to spend in commuting each day is one hour, and that people adjust their circumstances to that, regardless of town and transport planning.

      Chadwick

      Delete
    4. Well those "J P" folks all had very good educations in Europe, didn't they. J P Morgan was even once thought of as a possible academic mathematician, I believe.

      So a bit of "entendre" wouldn't be unexpected from Getty. Though perhaps the cheesemakers might interject. But as the Pythons remind us: "Oh, it's the meek! Blessed are the meek! Oh, that's nice, isn't it? I'm glad they're getting something, 'cause they have a hell of a time."

      Then again, apart from maybe a few privileged pharoahs who inherited a pyramid, we all "inherit the earth" don't we. So I'd claim that as one clear entendre. But a couple of them ? Hmmm, please explain.

      Delete
    5. GB - did not intend to let this languish, but friends took advantage of easier travel surveillance today and I have been enjoying human company.

      I intended nothing obscure about the 'entendres' - and your Python recollection covered it - aggressive capitalists, seeing themselves the embodiment of Herbert Spencer's 'survival of the fittest', count on the meek to remain meek as they, the masters of the money, gather up what they can, by whatever means. That other engineer, Vilfredo Pareto, enriched the study of economics by showing how that effect might be quantified for study. Economics seems to need a sprinkling of engineers to sort out its methods.

      Chadwick

      Delete
    6. Ah. Well so it goes. Politics could also do with that "sprinkling of engineers" but they never seem to seek any.

      But they have taken Pareto's 80/20 fully on board: do as little as you can get away with, and expect (and claim) big results.

      Delete
  2. The Bromancer is just a basic reptile at heart: gets his fangs stuck into some poor rodent and just won't let go until he can swallow it whole. In the meantime leaving a yawning gap between itself and what we benighted folks call 'reality'. But then, what about this: "Restoring a balance of power partly by restoring our own capabilities is the best contribution to a better narrative."

    Not to peace, mind, just to "a better narrative". Well, can I remind the Bro that "our own capabilities" once included two serviceable aircraft carriers ? Not just pissant helicopter landing pads, but, in the existence of HMAS's Melbourne and Sydney, two actual aircraft carriers. I look forward to the Bro's plan for re-equipping our Navy with two of them.

    Now mind, HMAS Melbourne did have a fatal smash wth HMAS Voyager, and the flight deck of HMAS Sydney warped and couldn't be used for aircraft takeoffs and landings so it was "converted" into a troop carrier where the troops bunked down on the aircraft hangar decks and since aircraft don't respire but troops do, and aircraft don't mind it being just a bit hot but troops do, then the troops nearly expired from heat and lack of oxygen. Most of 'em did live long enough to make it to Vietnam, though, where plenty of 'em died anyway.

    So yeah, let's restore those "capabilities". And also, as the Bro reminds us, "the ADF is too small, and is going to grow by only a pitiful 800 over the next decade". Well, you know that at the end of the "1930s and 1940s" thing, Australia had very nearly 1,000,000 people (men and women) in uniform out of a population of just about 7,000,000 - yes, 1 in 7 (Women's Land Army anybody ?). Not all of them had actually experienced active service, but a great many had. How about building an ADF of 3,500,000 (out of 25,000,000) to "restore our capabilities" ?

    Now in Mr Jennings' offering, we find this: "$50bn of the $270bn is free to be allocated to long-range missiles, hypersonic and direct energy weapons, autonomous land sea and air vehicles, satellite constellations, amphibious ships and the rest."

    Well, blow me down if that doesn't seem like Jennings - unlike that military strategy and hardware genius, the Bromancer - has actually heard of 'intelligent drones'. And of course we'll need heaps of "amphibious ships" when most of our 3,500,000 ADF forces land to take Beijing.

    Finally, back to real reality in a thorough investigation of all the minutiae of a NSW federal by-election. Oh just so exciting waiting to see who cops the miracle this time - and two so very deserving candidates in SloMo and Albanese its hard to make a choice, isn't it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. “Restoring a balance of power partly by restoring our own capabilities is the best contribution to a better narrative.".......What the fuck does that even mean? Are we telling Xi that in maybe 20 years he’ll be really sorry he messed with us......and doesn’t Xi know that Angus has a stash of beefed up fuel supplies in the USA.

      Slightly off topic but related to an apex reptile getting into trying to swallow the topic whole(UBI) and getting fully triggered in the process. And let’s face it, the whole world triggers Sheridan.
      https://twitter.com/jackrweinstein/status/1278182776160870400

      p.s. Enjoyed the link GB.

      Delete
    2. The Jerry Garcia one, I take it Anony. Though the Arlo Guthrie one is good too. Always a joy watching a Fox News interview, isn't it; especially Tucker the Fvcker.

      But yes, the reptiles just bleat out whatever swirls around in their addled brains. Stuff that the likes of the Bromancer regale us with used to be called 'stream of consciousness' writing, I think, though the 'consciousness' aspect of it is just a little doubtful in the case of the reptiles.

      Delete
    3. Yes GB.....loved it. Ta. Ditto Arlo Guthrie.
      CA.

      Delete
    4. DP's Mandolin Orange sessions - both as duet and quintet - were eminently listenable too. But one small question: have you ever heard Suzanne Vega's 'Tom's Diner' ?
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkYPge6ZKSQ

      And have we done this one before ?
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TD2Niae26Ow

      Delete

Comments older than two days are moderated and there will be a delay in publishing them.