The aim of this unit is to leave herpetology students better prepared for the arduous task of portentously and pretentiously referencing philosophers and historians and poets - the more ancient the better.
Required reading: no actual reading is required, but it is required that students be armed either with a google-like tool (go the ducks if you must), or an old-fashioned source of quotations, the more ancient and irrelevant to the modern world the better.
This site doesn't like to boast, but thanks to a recent street library find, it became the proud owner of A Dictionary of Quotations, by Colonel Philip Hugh Dalbiac. It should be sufficient to note that the dictionary was compiled by a Colonel for students to be reassured that this is exactly the sort of reference they should somehow acquire.
While there is no date on this volume by Thomas Nelson and Sons, Ltd, of sundry parts of the world, including London, Edinburgh, Toronto, New York, Paris and Melbourne, the Paris of the south, it carries an elegant ink stamp of ancient public service pedigree, though in this case for Trinity College of Music London, 310 George Street Sydney.
Herpetology students might be unaware that Trinity has maintained a local presence for many years, and still has a website boasting of its presence. Those doubting the longevity of colonial presence may look to Trove for a July 1925 report on the practical examinations of May 1925 in The Sydney Morning Herald.
At this point, some stray reader might indulge in some foot-stamping and moan to the sky, "what in the long absent lord's name does this have to do with anything, you bloody ning nong", at which point a skilled herpetology student could embark on a discussion of the source of ning nong, and whether it should in fact be in need of a hyphen ...
As this is a summer school unit, there will be few visual distractions. Students are required to focus on the words, and must imagine the visuals ... though clues are provided.
Students will be marked up if they can take a quotation and try to make sense of it by offering another quotation.
For example, if a student encounters "climate change activism that reached new heights after Greta Thunberg’s rise to stardom", they might like to point to recent stories, such as Climate change: Seasonal shifts causing 'chaos' for UK nature, or 2023's costliest climate disasters show poor lose out in 'global postcode lottery'.
While such references will establish the bleeding heart credentials of the student, better students will immediately enlist Thucydides, saying "for it has always been law that the weaker should be subject to the stronger", History of the Peloponnesian War.
Or:
“For the love of gain would reconcile the weaker to the dominion of the stronger, and the possession of capital enabled the more powerful to reduce the smaller towns to subjection.” The History of the Peloponnesian War
Now that the ground rules for the unit have been established, it should be noted that there is no time limit on this unit. Students may spend as much time as they like digging out arcane and irrelevant quotations, the more arcane and irrelevant the better ...
Goodbye, 2023: The year of living angrily
The first test for the diligent student might have come a tad early for even the most diligent because they must imagine a photo of a scene designed to produce shock, horror, terror, fear and loathing in the reptile readership, and all from a descriptive line ...
Environmental activists march through Treasury Garden in Melbourne. *
5:00AM December 29, 2023
But the year’s tone merely reflects the legitimation, over the past decade, of outrage as the dominant style of political expression.
Of course, politics is inherently antagonistic: it involves a clash between alternatives. Henry Adams had a point when he wrote, way back in 1907, that political competition is “the systematic organisation of hatreds”. The promise of democracy, however, is that it moderates that competition’s excesses, funnelling its passions into well-defined channels that prevent controversy degenerating into limitless conflict.
Quite when that promise slipped our grasp is inevitably hard to determine. But a crucial step was the persecution and near judicial execution of Cardinal George Pell.
More clearly than in any previous case, that maelstrom involved the convergence of virtual lynch mobs on Twitter, unabashedly one-sided reporting by the ABC and SBS, and a political chorus led by the Greens but which included substantial parts of the ALP.
Some students might have been bemused to see a scene from 2019 featured in the story.
Cardinal George Pell arrives at Melbourne County Court in February 2019.
But the choice of target was no accident. As well as paying for the sins of the church, Pell stood for everything his assailants detested: attachment to tradition; a scholar’s love of the Western canon; and an adamant rejection of the belief that personal identity and sexual preference are mere consumer items, to be adopted and discarded as readily as a snake sheds its skin. Expressed by a Muslim cleric in Lakemba or Broadmeadows, conservative Islamic values would have been entirely acceptable. Expressed by a Christian prelate from Ballarat, conservative Western values were not.
Viewed in the longer term, that episode’s legacy to our political culture was three-fold: the cult of the victim, whose allegations had to be taken at face value; the entrenchment of self-loathing, in which Western values were necessarily despicable; and a vision of the world dichotomised into saints and devils, along with a scarcely concealed command to extirpate the latter.
Jacinta Price accuses Albanese of ‘ignoring Indigenous issues’ after Voice failure
Led by “Extinction Rebellion”, those movements’ striking feature was their utter contempt for the law. Endorsed, or at least tolerated, by education authorities, schoolchildren were almost everywhere allowed to skip classes and engage in mass protests. At the same time, the movement’s militants acted – often with official connivance – as if public inconvenience could never outweigh what they (fallaciously) considered their rights.
They were, in other words, fanatics; once again in the original meaning of the term, which Philip Melanchthon, the great German Lutheran reformer, coined to describe those possessed by the phantasm of “enacting on Earth the kingdom of heaven through the elimination of the devils who stand in their way”.
All that provided immensely fertile ground for #MeToo. As the Gadarene swine became the epitome of the age, the presumption of innocence – already trashed by the Pell case – was trampled underfoot in the rush to condemn. Any word of caution, any hint that tantrums needed to be distinguished from traumas and grudges from genuine grievances, was denounced as sure evidence of misogyny.
With #MeToo deployed to devastating effect against the Morrison government, the sordid Brittany Higgins saga then gave Labor and a herd of “progressive” media personalities a formidable weapon in the election campaign.
Greta Thunberg pleads not guilty for blocking venue entrance while protesting
It is consequently unsurprising that the newly elected government went into the referendum brimming with hubris. It may have been madness; but in the shrewd formulation of Roy Porter’s A Social History of Madness, “even the mad are men of their time” – and this was a time that seemed to be going their way.
The referendum campaign therefore relied on the standard playbook, including casting the issue as a struggle between unquestioned good and unredeemed evil. There are very few instances, if any, of the No campaign’s leading figures denigrating their opponents’ intelligence or good faith; there are at least 65 instances of prominent Yes campaigners, including government ministers, describing the No case’s supporters as bigots, liars or just plain stupid. Nor did defeat quell their rage: it simply converted it into a potentially deadly cocktail of abject denial, aggrieved silence and simmering resentment.
There are, in this chain of events, stark echoes of an ancient lesson. The Greeks, who thought deeply about rage, believed it differed fundamentally from ordinary anger: anger had a defined focus; rage, a sign of fury at the world, was labile, readily shifting from one object to another. Characteristic of personal immaturity, it was by its nature opportunistic, rushing to the target of the moment, like a child rushing to a new toy.
Centuries later, Anna Freud, in a well-known article on aggression, reprised that conclusion. A good or true lover, she noted, is faithful; “in contrast, a ‘good hater’ is promiscuous: he has free aggression at his disposal and is ready to cathect with it on a non-permanent basis any object”. Love sticks; the perpetually restless, never satiated, aggression of haters moves and spreads. And as it does so, it readily resuscitates, albeit in ever varying form, the hideous archetypes of the past.
A final visual featured ...
Juergen Habermas
None of that has come out of the blue; it is the fruit of a decade of “progressive” activism, which has elevated rage into its modus operandi. Labor purports to be uncomfortable with its results; it would be better if it had the moral clarity to acknowledge how we got here and reflect on its lessons.
As 2024 dawns, we will remember our Tennyson: “Ring out a slowly dying cause, / And ancient forms of party strife; / Ring in the nobler modes of life, / With sweeter manners, purer laws”.
But we will also remember Thucydides’ grim yet lucid warning. It is, he wrote, in the nature of human affairs, with their weaknesses and crippling imperfections, that the abysses loom far greater than the peaks. And when mayhem is on the march, pushing us towards the abyss, all of humanity’s reserves of culture, courage and resolve are needed to stop it in its tracks.
At this point, slack students will revert to traditional forms and Xmas messaging, because it's only a few days, a few weeks, a few months to the next one ...
That was easily the most pompous worst/best rant that Henry ur-gas has ever written - about as coherent as the squawking of a running around headless chook or the still wriggling dropped tail of a skink
ReplyDeleteJust warming up.
ReplyDeleteHenry Adams - "Those then, who resist a confirmation of public order, are the true Artificers of monarchy..."
Linked image title, and new collective noun by Ergas... a "systematic organisation of hatreds” or SOOH.
Here is a 3 SOOH.
Image Title: "true Artificers of monarchy"
Caption: 'Protesters dress up as Barnaby Joyce, Scott Morrison and Turnbull as part of a global school students climate strike in March 2019."
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/gallery/2023/dec/28/no-more-hot-air-australian-climate-activism-and-political-satire-in-pictures#img-9
Cory Doctorow, who also received an HD at a prior "Summer school for Herpetology" from Loonpond U, features other graduates using Loonpindian style in a homage to Dot in...
ReplyDelete"Quiz: Breitbart headline, or KKK newspaper headline from the 1920s?
CORY DOCTOROW
Like many of his colleagues, historian Peter Shulman has cautioned against the excessive use of Nazi comparisons in assessing our present-day political scene, arguing that those in search of historical antecedents should study our very own homegrown history of white supremacy instead. Recently, he was browsing around in a new database of Ku Klux Klan newspapers from the 1920s when he noticed how eerily similar the headlines in some of the regional and national Klan publications the database catalogs were to those that have run on Breitbart of late.
Guess Whether These Headlines Came From Breitbart or 1920s KKK Newspapers
[ndrew Kahn, Rebecca Onion, and Peter A. Shulman/Slate]
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_vault/2017/09/14/quiz_tests_whether_headlines_came_from_breitbart_or_1920s_kkk_newspapers.html
https://boingboing.net/2018/06/05/roundup-ready.html
What a perfect way to end the year on a Henry high; a pompous old duffer re-fighting years-old culture wars, armed primarily with even older quotations.
ReplyDeleteThe Reptiles are reminiscent of those enthusiasts who stage re-enactments of American Civil War battles. I suppose though that the latter at least get some fun out of their activities, and don’t labour under the delusion that they can somehow actually change the past through their actions.
But Anony, the past is infinitely malleable since it no longer physically exists. The reptiles are just showing the accuracy of Orwell's 1984 point: they work like Winston Smith. If you 'rewrite' history well enough, or even just often enough, then it's the rewrite that is history.
Deletehttps://allthatsinteresting.com/krypteia-sparta
ReplyDeleteYeah, thanks for the reminder, Anony. It's something that the KKK had in mind with their 'helots'. There might even have been a bit of it around here.
DeleteOn Ergas "The physician Galen (129 –c. 216 AD) in his work On the Diagnosis and Cure of Henry's Soul's Passions, observes that those who are the most prone to error are the least aware of their own failings. See example below
ReplyDelete"He attributes this to the fact that Ergas does not take any note of the opinions of Parker, Quiggin and others, believing their own self-assessments to be accurate, whereas "those men who leave to others the task of declaring what kind of men they are fall into few errors".
wikipedia /Know_thyself
This writer hasn't attended Loonpond U, yet is worthy of an honorary Dorothy. Maybe the "Shouting at Clouds Elucidation" award. Or the esteemed "those men who leave to others the task of declaring what kind of men they are fall into few errors"
Worth a read for the complete Ergas idiocy. Worth a quote in future Dot.
"The piece got a bit of attention, and has now been paid the compliment of a full length reply in Quadrant by Henry Ergas. Ergas raises some good points, and usefully extends the discussion in important respects. Unfortunately, he misses the point of the article fairly thoroughly, to the point where he often seems to be arguing against an imaginary opponent. His repeated claims that the paper is unclear reflect the problems he is having matching my paper to the one he thinks he is reading. The debate isn’t helped by the fact that, although Quadrant is now at least partly online, the idea of hyperlinks is too new for its editor, with the result that most of Ergas readers will probably not have read the piece he is criticising.
"Ergas attributes three main points to me, which I"ll take in reverse order of his presentation, and also in reverse order of distance from what I actually wrote."...
...
"Ergas v Quiggin on risk and social democracy"
JANUARY 8, 2008
https://johnquiggin.com/2008/01/08/ergas-v-quiggin-on-risk-and-social-democracy/
Henry remarked on the Quiggin line "with the result that most of Ergas readers will probably not have read the piece he is criticising" ... saying...
"It serves me right for putting all my coddled eggs in one bastard"!
[On her abortion, as quoted in You Might as well Live by John Keats (1970) Dorothy Parker quotes via wikipedia.[
Interesting that Quiggin considered that Holely Henry had made 'some good points'. But then that was a decade and a half ago and Henry hadn't gone total moron yet, had he.
DeleteWonder if Henry would ever have written that Quiggin had made some good points. Wonder if Henry could actually grasp Quiggin's points nowadays.
PS: does that bit on Galen mean that he preceded Dunnnig-Kruger by a millennium or two ?.
DeleteTo recent stories about 'climate change activism', add another one:
ReplyDeleteWorld will look back at 2023 as year humanity exposed its inability to tackle climate crisis, scientists say
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/dec/29/world-will-look-back-at-2023-as-year-humanity-exposed-its-inability-to-tackle-climate-crisis
I think we'd actually exposed that 'inability' long, long ago.