Sunday, April 21, 2024

In which Jenny is spurred to ramble about gas, and Polonius shows his fighting pluck ...

 


The pond is starting to get to the point where it red cards reptiles before they get out of the gate. Take this triptych of terror ...




Joe, the lesser member of the Kelly gang, "Ned", the leader of the Kelly gang and Alan Howe doing over Assange by saying he's no journalist ... while scribbling, without the slightest hint of irony, for the lizard Oz?

The pond red-cared "Ned"with great relief yesterday and the same goes for Joe and as for the howling Howe, the pond will at least note that his current claim to fame is the preparer of obituaries ... so perhaps he's just warming up to his job on Assange ...




History editor? Now there's a full time job at the lizard Oz ... so much tosh to edit, and so little of it done...

The pond also passed on this serve of fried rice ...



They'll never shut up, it'll go on for years ...

The pond also decided to pass on the Angelic one, offering deep sympathy to the psychotic Bondi Junction killer as part of her fundamentalist tyke Xian duty ...

The pond only came away with a few notes ...

The most bizarre explanation was that he was, in the words of one correspondent to this publication, a “radicalised misogynist”, a quintessentially postmodern notion that proves there always has to be some explanation rooted in someone’s bad psychology, transformed into ideology. For some it is always thus, no matter how superficial the explanation for an act that seems otherwise beyond human understanding.
A straight-out manifestation of violence targeted specifically at women also was the favourite theme of female radio hosts, all keen to push this as a misogynistic act that required more protection for women, although most of the people strolling through a shopping centre on a Saturday afternoon probably are women, and casually shopping women are easily distracted and easy targets.
This theory conveniently ignores the one unfortunate male victim, but for some professional know-alls it was yet another opportunity to portray men as latent monsters. For others it was a simplistic way to find something to say, anything, about something that seemed inexplicable. 

That wasn't how the pond remembered it going down, and a quick visit to the Graudian confirmed that it was the chief NSW plod who'd steered the conversation in that direction...

Queenslander Joel Cauchi has been identified by police as the man who took a knife from his backpack on Saturday afternoon and stabbed five women and one man to death and injured several others.
NSW Police Commissioner Karen Webb said while investigators were looking into the 40-year-old's past and a possible motivation for the attack it was "obvious" to her that Cauchi was targeting women.
"The videos speak for themselves, don't they?" she told ABC News Breakfast on Monday.
"It's obvious to me, it's obvious to detectives that it seems to be an area of interest that the offender focused on women and avoided the men."

Frankly the pond doesn't much care about all the theories. It's obviously disturbing when an unhinged person turns mass killer, but this closing Angelic one line completely bemused the pond, and led to her red carding ...

As a mother and as a friend of other mothers, some of whose children have balanced precariously on the edge of madness, I cannot feel anything but enormous sadness and compassion for Cauchi, a child who was lost, killed to save others and possibly, in the end, himself.

(He) killed to save others and possibly in the end himself? 

What on earth does that mean? Was he sensibly killed to save others, or did he kill to save others, and possibly himself?

Was he a member of the army, navy or air force? Did he do time in Iraq or Afghanistan? The best the pond could come up with was this portrait of his life when he should have been killing to save others ...

Cauchi grew up in Toowoomba where he studied at the University of Southern Queensland and, according to his Facebook page, worked as an English tutor online.
He was a member of many social groups, including the Toowoomba Car Club and Toowoomba Arts Society, and appears to have had an interest in life drawing.
He later lived in Brisbane, in Kangaroo Point and Carina, before returning to his family’s home in Toowoomba.

He killed to save others at the Toowoomba Arts Society?

Oh okay, the pond can feel an argument about the use of apostrophes to indicate possessive case. Better pray on that one, while there's no words for the stories of the victims, stories abruptly cut short.

Here's another grievance. 

The pond can understand why the reptiles have banned talk of the Gaza genocide, but why have they abandoned the New York trial of the orange Jesus, deep in suffering ... sit, orange fur-covered hound, sit ...




To quote the great man himself ... all around the world they're saying ... roll on Monday's circus.

But with all the red cards and strike outs, the pond was stumped for an opening act before prattling Polonius took the stage, but then decided a Jenny George garage band was better than nothing ...





This might outrage some, but the pond has an ulterior motive, as we head down the rabbit hole with the quisling, lickspittle lackey member of the reptile Vichy regime ...




Naturally there was a snap of a demonic figure, servant to Satan ...





But here's the pond's ulterior motive. Over the years the pond has made many references to Fame is the Spur, which featured Michael Redgrave as a politician radicalised by the Peterloo Massacre, who treasures a sword handed down by his grandfather as a symbol of his radicalism ...







You can see where this metaphor is heading ...




India? We should put our faith in Hindu nationalism of the far right kind? 

And then as a capper, there was a snap of the sort of company George likes to keep these days, the beefy boofhead windmill hater with an office in Goulburn ...




The point of course is that in the course of Fame is the Spur, Redgrave's politician becomes the sort of politician he once despised. 

At the end of the film, in his dotage, he totters over to get down the sword, and finds it rusted into its scabbard ...






It's a clunky metaphor, and yet it suits George perfectly, and there's a reason, and it comes in just two words in the final gas-loving gobbet...




And there you have it, two deadly words to show this Tootle has left the tracks. "Virtue signalling", as in "beware the pitfalls of virtue signalling."

That's a sign that George has jumped the shark and nuked the fridge, and now has joined the reptiles, with the sword well and truly rusted in the scabbard ...

And so to Polonius and his prattle, and a few days ago, the pond warned that it might not be able to cop with the burst of Jingoism that erupts around this time of year, and in his usual way, Polonius fired the first shot across the pond's bow... and there will be a history lesson ...





Egad sir, the pond won't argue the causes of the first world war, it endured enough of that when studying history, even when the most specious reason is offered, and even when all the competing empires were doing their damndest to bring on a war, imagining it as some sort of nineteenth centur frolic.

And egad sir, the pond isn't in the business of noting that actually the landing was planned to take place on beaches about a mile north of where the troops landed... it might not have mattered much, it was just another sign of singular incompetence and disregard for the lives of the troops.

Instead, the pond is here to celebrate military thinking with cartoons which would have served the bromancer just as well yesterday ...


 



Gad sir, the pond is here to celebrate Polonius's extensive record of service in the armed forces, and his valiant deeds on the battlefield, down there with the pond's ...




At this point, the reptiles enlisted a snap of soldiers in Polonius's cause, but there's no need to feature their involuntary involvement ... who knows what actual soldiers actually fighting might actually think of war?





The pond's main memory of war is the pond's grandfather returned from the Somme to become an alcoholic wife-beater constantly disturbed by nightmares.

On with valiant Polonius, a veritable Hotspur, if occasionally undone by his ill-weaved ambition to return to The Insiders and make it even worse than it currently is ...




That's about the first refuge of the scoundrel, that line about loving it or leaving it ...

The pond knew there'd been a reason for mentioning the orange Jesus ...





Still, it nicely positions Polonius where he feels comfortable with the company he likes to keep ... with the next reptile snap featuring company he doesn't like at all...





Strangely Polonius was silent on how we won the Vietnam war, a favourite topic of his over the years, but it's too late now, as the final gobbet looms...




The pond isn't quite certain what that last par meant. We should remember that Germany was once a Pacific power? 

Should we also once remember we fought a war with Japan and that China was treated as an ally? Should we note that Vlad the sociopath's country has a Pacific edge, and the tattered remnants of the moderate GOP have finally plucked up the courage to support plucky Ukraine, despite the best endeavours of the likes of the Yale hillbilly 'leet and Moscow Marge (close relative of Tuckyo Rose)? (Funding to help stop one genocide, funding to help continue another, so it goes ...)

Should we remember that all sorts of European powers treated the Pacific like their plaything, and even now Europe Yearns to Be an Indo-Pacific Player?

Whatever, one way or another, we must work hard to have that reptile war with China by Xmas ... meanwhile, the pond will spend its Anzac day remembering the victims and the complete futility of war, while jingoists strut about in peacock Sydney Institute colours handing out white feathers.

Here's a cartoon for Polonius celebrating warrior virtues...






And so to celebrate traditional Australian, sorry, American, values ...





And since the pond has been carton lite this day, how about a TT?




20 comments:

  1. "We should remember that Germany was once a Pacific power?"

    Explains the desiccated coconut in the bickies, dunnit? If not how righteous allies of specious warmongers preemptively being attacked-by-attacking willy-nilly is a recipe for good Niger yellowcake.

    ReplyDelete
  2. She's a wonder isn't she: "This theory [specifically targetting women] conveniently ignores the one unfortunate male victim...". Of course it does. After all, at least according to the Angelical one, Cauchi took one look at the security guard, Faraz Tahir, who was trying to stop the attack and defend the women and obviously declared him to be an 'honorary woman' thus keeping to his obsession.

    You wouldn't read about it, would you. At least you wouldn't read about anywhere else.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Divided loyalties! I understand that the pond has had a gutful of Lehrman (and the Voice, and Chinese epidemics, and ... ), but I don't mind a little diversion, distraction, escapism from the issues of the day, so perhaps you will bear with me. Not expecting any intel in response, but as I watch the centre right warriors continue their character attack on the recently victorious Higgins team, I am wondering where the counter offensive is, to wit, how did Lehrman come to be employed by the Liberals in the first place? Afterall, his job was not the sort of job that anyone off the street walks into, and so who recommended him, what was his past, did he have any sort of form? Was Lehrman the sort of person the Liberals were looking for? Of course this is not talked about. AG.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course Lehrmann was the kind of person that is employed by a certain brand of politicians; the thing is though, that they're supposed to know how to get away with it (whatever their preferred "it" is) without getting rumbled. And if we're seeing this as a one off 'exceptional case' in an otherwise unblamed existence, then there's nothing to get excited about, is there.

      Delete
  4. Who needs enemies when you have supposed friends like George and Ferguson from the ACTU what do the Labor party make of the kind that contribution that they make when they infiltrate and suck a living from their position.

    ReplyDelete
  5. A very flat contribution from Polonius this week. A pretty routine listing of several well - known conflicts involving Australian military forces, a bit of a hand-clap for Ming and that’s pretty much it. He perks up a little with a brief claim that the evil Left are attempting to undermine Western Civilisation (tm), but that’s about it when it. Even his sole reference to the ABC is free of criticism! Where’s the sour, obsessive pedant we all know and…. well, know?

    BTW, hasn’t Polonius received the memo from the Bromancer that Marles is the very worst Defence Minister of all all time, or at least since the last one? What is happening to the Reptile hive-mind?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jennie the George: "Manufacturing is at an all-time low of 6 per cent of the workforce." Yeah, terrible ennit - all those years of LNP dominance (1996 - 2007 and 2013-2022) didn't do anything much but close down more manufacturing (remember GMH, Ford and Toyota ?).

    Anyway, here's a slighty different interpretation of what that "6 per cent of the workforce" really means:

    The Stats Guy: Australian manufacturing is stronger than you think
    https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/finance/2024/04/19/the-stats-guy-australian-manufacturing

    "In 1990, manufacturing was responsible for about 14 per cent of our national GDP. That figure now stands at 5 per cent. Yes, you are guessing the punchline correctly. In absolute terms, manufacturing added more value to the national economy.
    Corrected for inflation, manufacturing added value to the tune of $104 billion in 1990 but today brings in $126 billion. Put simply, manufacturing is economically more important now than it was in the past.
    "

    ReplyDelete
  7. Apparently Gerard Henderson is unable to distinguish between achievements and failures. The criticisms of aspects of Western civilization, which Gerard labels as attacks (apparently he sees them as akin to waging a full-scale military war), are not about Western civilization's achievements, but about its failures.

    Perhaps I've missed the big news of the week, but so far I've yet to hear any reports of members of the left intelligensia or any migrants running through the streets waving AK47s or whatever.

    And why is Melbourne the most left-wing city? Comrade Dan and Pinko Pesutto have been banned by Vlad. How many times must Gerard be reminded that Melbourne isn't alone and most other states and Territories, as well as at the federal government, are now run by those Gerard regards as the enemy within. Surely Gerard is too late to warn us - the war has been waged and he lost.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Awww - as I scanned the bait for the 'Curious Snail' this morning, I saw that they had awoken Akker Dakker long enough to write, or recycle, what appeared to be one of his standard, mawkish, jingoistic 'thoughts on ANZAC day' items.

    Just went looking again, and it has been dropped off the electronic front. Is Piers no longer the reader-magnet he used to be? Have all those little-old-ladies who used to address comments to 'Dear Piers' fallen off their perches around the country? It is unlikely that reptile management (if that is not an oxymoron) is concerned about readers wanting more of Piers, requiring them to wake him again before the 25th. Anyway, we might put it down to some kind of nostalgia in the reptile pit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 'Dear Piers' ? Strewth, there's just no accounting for it, is there: firstly there's ultra-godly Angelica spouting about 'dear Joel Cauchi' and how sad it all is, and then there's those dear old ladies swooning over Piers.

      And this was supposedly created by two out of three omniscient, omnipotent members of the Trinity (waiting for JC to come in a few thousand years when created by himselves). When will it ever end ?

      Delete
  9. General of the Armies Gerard Henderson -
    "The US did not enter WW I until late 1917 and made scant impact on the outcome."
    Fuck you and the horse you rode in on, Jerry.
    Imperialist European powers dragged the world into a cauldron of death
    in order to enhance their bottom line, be it economic or so called national
    interests.
    As a result some poor Iowa farm boy looking over fields stretching to the horizon
    finds himself 8 months on in no man's land staring at the shreds of what once was
    his wedding tackle
    as the medics assure him he'll live. Not much impact there in the overall
    scheme of things, I agree. Just the cost of doing business.

    March 1918 - 280,000 green US troops in France, getting needed training from
    combat veteran British, French and yes, Australian NCOs.
    July 1918 - 10,000 Americans each DAY are arriving in France as the US hits
    its mobilization stride. Plus massive aide of every type that is the only
    reason the Allied powers could still wage war and feed their people.

    The French army at that point after the mutinies was barely capable
    of mounting any kind of major let alone war winning offensive.
    I'll stop here, just to note the Germans themselves would have been flummoxed
    by Jerry "call me Liddell Hart" Henderson's dimwitted assertions.

    Okay I lied, I can't stop when Jerry keeps adding to his shit pile.

    "Eisenhower's troops" at Inchon? In September 1950? Really?

    By 1948 Ike was out of the army and president of Columbia University.
    Not until December 1950 was he recalled to the colors, named Supreme Commander of
    NATO. A for "Atlantic" Ocean should have been a clue to Jerry as to the location
    of Eisenhower's command.

    What the hell, troops here, troops there, they die here, they die there.
    Its just moving bits around a Risk playing board anyway.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, without the American contingent, WWI might still be being fought. But nonetheless, of the participants, we do also remember Australia:

      "According to the First World War page on the Australian War Memorial website from a population of fewer than five million, 416,809 men enlisted, of which over 60,000 were killed and 156,000 wounded, gassed, or taken prisoner. The latest figure for those killed is given as 62,000."
      https://guides.slv.vic.gov.au/wwone_soldiers/casualties

      And a few of the Aussie generals (not only Monash) weren't half bad back then either.
      https://youtu.be/cnFzCmAyOp8

      Delete
    2. GB,
      That is an impressive sacrifice by a nation of then 5 million, with far more men
      serving on that basis than what the US fielded.
      I honor those men and women plus the civilians that suffered in WW I, but I despise
      all the failed leaders and nations that put 60,000 of your countrymen in their
      graves and cheated them of all the good things in life.
      Queen Victoria's grandchildren sure caused a lot of trouble, especially Kaiser
      Bill.
      A friend of mine who writes for a museum on the NYC Labor movement sent
      me the below link when I mentioned Loon Pond, as I believe you had cited
      Monash that day -

      https://forward.com/community/375320/the-secret-jewish-history-of-the-greatest-general-youve-never-heard-of/


      Delete
    3. Yeah, that pretty much says it all, JM. The university named after him is one of the biggest and best in Australia - second only to Melbourne University in Victoria.

      But there were a few other very accomplished Aussie WWI generals - William Glasgow and Pompey Elliott for instance:
      https://sjmc.gov.au/major-general-william-glasgow/

      As to the Aussie troops - all volunteers back then IIRC because we didn't have conscription - it was one of those crazinesses where the volunteers nearly all seemed to think that the mighty Anglo forces would end the war by Xmas (in 1914) and they signed up for a little paid adventure.

      We didn't repeat the idiocy in WWII and we had conscription then, but even so, 1 million out of 7 million saw service in uniform though not all served in combat.

      Delete
  10. "Here's another grievance. 
    The pond can understand why the reptiles have banned talk of the Gaza genocide, but why have they abandoned the New York trial of the orange Jesus, deep in suffering ... sit, orange fur-covered hound, sit ..."

    And another.
    Imperial Germany 1914+110=2024
    Tom Tomorrow panel 4.

    "Yanis Varoufakis: My Berlin Speech on Palestine That German Police Entered the Venue to Ban"
    Posted on April 13, 2024 by Yves Smith

    "Yves here. Fascism has arrived in Europe. The crackdown on speech, here in Germany in support of Palestinian rights, is deliberately thuggish and looks set only to get worse."
    By Yanis Varoufakis. Originally published at his website

    YV: "The speech that I could not deliver because German police burst into our Berlin venue to disband our Palestine Congress (1930s style) before I could address the meeting. Judge for yourselves the kind of society Germany is becoming when its police bans the following words:"
    ...
    https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/04/yanis-varoufakis-my-berlin-speech-on-palestine-that-german-police-entered-the-venue-to-ban.html

    ReplyDelete
  11. Polonius: "This explains the decision of successive Australian governments to support traditional allies - first Britain, then the US...". Sure we "supported" them - yeah, like the fall of Singapore in WWII - one of our great acts of "support" of Britain. But I gather that what really happened was that we 'abandoned' the useless Poms in order to look to the US to rescue and support us from the Japs (as we called them then).

    Though yes, we did stop the Japs on Kokoda and inflict their first ground forces defeat in WWII. Sometimes we just have to remember that of the about 7 million Australians around during WWII, roughly 1 million served in uniform and many of them saw armed conflict. But not the Land Army, of course.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "We should remember that Germany was once a Pacific power?" Yes, and Germany granted us New Guinea back in 1914 instead of fighting us for it. And then we some time later gave half of it - at Kissinger's request - to the Indonesians without making them fight for it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And we had no right to hand anything to another nation.New Guinea should have remained as a sovereign state look how the indigenous people are treated by the occupier.

      Delete
    2. Pretty much how indigenous people have always been treated by occupiers, Anony.

      But at least we did end up helping the East Timorese get 'liberated'.

      Delete
  13. Hendo the Historian: :"The Us did not enter WW1 until late 1917 and made scant impact on the outcome". So, 42 Divisions (super strength ones at that), 1 M men in France, and the German High Command in a tiz? What will Lachlan have to say about this?

    ReplyDelete

Comments older than two days are moderated and there will be a delay in publishing them.