Sunday, March 10, 2024

In which the pond can forget about nuking the country and enjoy a quiet Sunday meditation ...

 

What a relief it is to reach the quiet meditative Sunday waters, and leave aside thoughts of nuking the country, covered at excessive length these last few days...

The only pity was that the infallible Pope dropped too late to make it into the cut ...



The pond is also grateful to be able to leave aside talk of the genocides in Gaza and Ukraine, and hot mike come to Jesus moments, and reports of people being killed by packages dropped from the sky ...





In notes on the minutes of the last meeting, the pond is indebted to an esteemed correspondent for a link to Richard Ackland's The Walter Sofronoff-Janet Albrechtsen imbroglio in The Saturday Paper. (possible paywall).

As there is much further business by doing a spoiler which also serves as a teaser, because the real meat comes earlier in the yarn:

...The proceedings before Kaye were conducted under the inherent powers of the Supreme Court, where he could make declarations of law that Sofronoff’s report breached fundamental legal principles – with no power to go beyond that.
None of which has stopped Janet Albrechtsen indulging in a generous bout of self-justification. Before Kaye’s judgement was delivered, she wrote that her sole purpose was to shine light and truth on the criminal justice chronicle of Lehrmann and Higgins.
Under the self-basting headline “We stand for the principles that guarantee a fair trial” she delivered a lecture about the importance of the rule of law and fairness.
Yet she appears to have no appreciation that she and Sofronoff were in a sub-rosa arrangement that amounted to unfairness and which, if discovered, would result in a report that was for all intents and purposes worthless.
So much for the rule of law.
We can hardly blame a journalist for wanting to get pally with a source in order to get the inside running, but here we have a journalist with an embedded agenda in cahoots with a functionary of government commissioned to make independent critical findings.
Only this week, in an imaginative reinterpretation of the outcome, Albrechtsen told her readers that Shane Drumgold’s reputation “remains in tatters” and that “the Sofronoff report remains standing”.
That’s not exactly true. As retired Melbourne barrister Geoffrey Gibson wrote in a recent edition of his newsletter: “Let me put it this way. Your professional conduct is the subject of a public inquiry conducted by an eminent lawyer with all the credentials for that purpose. You are being pursued in the press by someone who makes a living from that kind of campaign and public vilification. The person hearing the matter then finds against you in very grave and personal terms. Then you find he has been secretly corresponding with your enemy all the time. Which of them do you want to throttle first?”

Bags throttling Dame Slap first, if only in a metaphorical way.

The pond has also finished its serious political analysis, after reading the latest Hydeing, Congratulations, Rupert Murdoch! Let’s hope this love match lasts longer than TalkTV ...

At last, some happy news. Rupert Murdoch is engaged – and for the second time in less than a year. I know! Despite being 93 next Monday, he’s getting engaged even more frequently than serial sex killers serving life sentences. Those betrothals, of course, tend to happen entirely by letter, but as far as we know, Murdoch’s latest love match is a real-world union. His fiancee is Elena Zhukova, 67, a retired biologist who also previously served as mother-in-law to Roman Abramovich. In the absence of an official engagement photo, just sub in that image from Alien 3 where the slavering alien corners Ripley in the infirmary. And please remember – the Fox News chairman emeritus’s lifelong commitment to irreverent stories about people’s private lives means the above is precisely how he wants his latest chapter to be covered.
As mentioned, this is Murdoch’s second proposal inside 12 months, his previous engagement enduring just a fortnight. Hand on heart, I was surprised he couldn’t make it work with that last one, a former dental hygienist/evangelical prison chaplain he met in one of his gardens, who had successfully dismissed a case of “financial elder abuse” brought by one of her previous stepchildren. She seemed so perfect. Back at the time they announced their intention to wed (not hugely long after Rupert reportedly told Jerry Hall via email that he was divorcing her), he gibbered out some hilarious interview to his own New York Post, in which he claimed: “I dreaded falling in love – but I knew this would be my last.”
And yet Murdoch has now faced those fears not once but twice – and all in less than half the TV broadcast lifespan of his disastrous TalkTV channel, which this week announced it was moving to online only. (Something about being “brave”, which felt quite “brave” in itself, given the calamitous rating circumstances.)

And so on - hang in until the last paragraph - though the cartoon in the same edition did give fair warning of what was to follow on the pond down the page, with a serve of left-over, reheated "Ned"...





First it was time to tune into prattling Polonius, raging against either the dying of the light on him, or perhaps on him on the ABC, or perhaps both ... with that dreadfully nasty savvy Savva now basking in the limelight...



Still brooding about Dunkley, and yet Polonius knows how to channel Black Knight syndrome ...



How many times has the pond shed a tear of sympathy at the way Polonius and his prattle was driven into exile by the cruel-cardigan wearing overlords?

Too many to count, but Polonius can always be counted on to remind the pond of the latest indignity...




How is that the allegedly savvy Savva now sits in Polonius's Insiders chair? 

Wasn't he one of the greatest comedy acts in ABC history, helped by David Marr playing the straight man (think Jerry Lewis and Dean Martin) ...






Look at his witty take down of the savvy Savva, wittily taking her down, with a witty display of take down wit ...

Sure there might be genocides elsewhere or comical nonagenarian ruttings, but here we're dealing with a genuine human tragedy, a humble man of inner Sydney CBD 'leet origins forced to step outside the tent, knowing it might be a long while before he's allowed back inside ...

How else can ABC viewers, all five of them, learn how to count the number of times "very" was mentioned on a show? Pedantry by the most expert of tedious pedants? You're standing in it ...

 Verily, very much has been lost by replacing the very sage seer with the very savage mocking Savva and spineless Speers ...




The pond was on a high, only tempered a little by that small billy goat buttism that turned up at the start of the last par: "Certainly, difficulties remain at all levels of the party in Western Australia and Victoria and within the party machine in Queensland and NSW."

Presumably that means that the Vandemonians and the croweaters are in spiffing shape, a huge chunk of the country heading in the right direction... as for the other states, piffle, mere flesh wounds, perhaps an arm or a leg lost, but ready for work the next day.

Leaving aside the light at the end of the Polonial tunnel, and the many thought crimes of the cardigan wearers, the pond turned to the Angelic one for news of the Catholic church breeding program ...




So she's been scribbling for 25 years, thanks to a plumb job, so that the Shanahans might indulge in a little nepotism, and all the pond gets is a cartoon?





There's a lot of people, let alone women, who wouldn't mind a little pin money, though some might shy from scribbling for Moloch ...

But the Angelic one has always had a prolific breeder's sense of entitlement ...




Yeah, it's so much easier taking cash in the paw from Moloch so you can scribble in defence of the Catholic church's ponzi scheme to get new recruits ...

The pond regrets wasting the last TT when it would have been a handy guide for future topics for the Angelic one to explore... you know, lie back and think of god and god, aka the Mango Mussolini ...




And so to the last gobbet, heralding all that's best about a turn to The Handmaid's Tale ... barefoot and pregnant and in a 1950s Catholic kitchen ...




Always with the boasting about the breeding, but what's remarkable is the tone: the querulousness, the sense of bitterness and grievance, with occasional flashes of anger and disapproval. You might think a life of satisfactory breeding would lead to contentment, but what's remarkable is the chip on the shoulder surliness and resentment ...

And having remarked on the remarkable whining tone, that meant it was time for the pond to move on to its pièce de résistance for this day's meditation ... and once again it's the Everest known as "Ned", held over because of the nuking of the country to save the planet ...




The pond confesses it will be interrupting "Ned" regularly with cartoons and as he mentioned the SOTU, the pond thought it might begin with the infallible Rowe ...






What a splendid vision, but don't expect "Ned" to cope ...




Here it's possible to see "Ned" trying to talk himself into the correct Faux Noise mindset, helped along by a snap of that demonic child of Satan ...




It's true, who wouldn't want a United States carved in the image of the wild west and the roaring '20s?







Yet as he goes along, "Ned's" Chicken Little tendencies come into play, as they always do, with a cluck here and a cluck there, and an abundance of both siderism worthy of an NY Times poll ...




A pivot? But the great GOP, and the greatest in the GOP, have endorsed the tangerine wannabe tyrant ...






Who could quibble at the tortoise's astonishing contributions?






With a record like that, of course "Ned" was going to do his best to cope with what Faux Noise has bequeathed to the country ... and the world.



Dying? Why the country has never been more alive ...






At this point the reptiles slipped in a snap of a meditative Haley, perhaps thinking about her loss...




...or perhaps she was brooding about SCOTUS crushing a dream ...







Whatever, as the pond eventually gets back to "Ned", please note how he's managed to regurgitate a number of mango Mussolini talking points without even bothering to interpolate a note regarding the rhetoric ...

In the end, you see, it's nothing to do with Faux Noise or the GOP or the MAGA cult, which boasts the likes of Dame Slap as a cap-wearing member. It's all the fault of Joe Biden ...





Look, if the pond constructed a poll with the right set of questions and the right set of respondents, and asked "do you think nattering 'Ned', verging on senility and with a tendency to humbug, should keep scribbling for the lizard Oz?', the pond thinks it could get the right answer, and then "Ned"might find himself in the same position as the GOP ...







There are two things deeply weird about the United States. The first is the relentless ongoing cycle of primaries, elections and the non-stop never ending election cycle, which keeps political junkies and the media happy, and the rest of the country either alienated, or bored and off doing their own thing.

The second is the deeply weird obsession with polling, which routinely fails the test...





More at Fortune here ...

...It is these methodological shortcomings and constraints which should draw greater attention rather than the breathless horse-race coverage based on who is up and who is down in the most recent polls across media.
As Jim Fallows notes, “if any professionals were as off base, as consistently, as political “experts” are, we’d look for someone else to do those jobs.”
Predictive political polling is helpful–as long as we bear in mind its constraints and limitations. There are enough known unknowns inherent to political polling methods, not to mention any unknown unknowns, which relegate them to more of an art than a science.
Without contrition, Nate Silver, one of the prominent pollster pundits who got it wrong was back at it this weekend, offering predictions on the Georgia U.S. Senate sweepstakes. The only lesson for pollsters seems to be: If you can’t predict accurately, predict often.

If you don't have a clue, just be a neighing "Ned", repeating often ...




Perhaps there's a different explanation ...





But enough of battered county syndrome, by this time the pond was deep in battered "Ned" syndrome ...




Inevitably "Ned" turned to talk of the border, and that's surely been a major success, because these days bipartisan is just an empty word ...






Sadly the bipartisan border folly was tossed aside in "Ned's" final gobbet, though frabjous joy, with the Everest once again climbed (the pond is beginning to feel more like a sherpa than your average tourist climber) ...




"Let's hope it is the least of the worst scenarios"?

What on earth does that mean? You get to the top of the summit and all you get is a cryptic message much like the jokes you find in Xmas crackers. Or a Zen koan you have to ponder for hours without ever reaching enlightenment.

Is "Ned" suggesting that the Donald is the least of the worst scenarios? 

Or is he a closeted Biden supporter, too gutless to come out and across the Faux Noise Murdochian line?

Who knows, but what a useless tool he is, what a fraud and a sham, what a pompous, portentous, pontificating humbug ... (has the pond said that very many times? The pond thinks it might be very, very many times).

Not to worry, the climbing's done and dusted, and thanks to the cartoons noted during the climb, the pond has managed to look away ...





.
.. but it seems that walls are the theme for the day ...






24 comments:

  1. I suspect that the Sainted Ange would be a big fan of the TradWife movement -
    https://www.salon.com/2023/11/27/the-insidious-rise-of-tradwives-a-right-wing-fantasy-is-rotting-young-mens-minds/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some people really do believe that the universe will happily satisfy their true desires.

      Delete
  2. Shanna: "...yet another Friedman or Greer..." Friedman ? Did she perhaps mean Friedan ?

    Then: "Interestingly, a lot of these measures also helped raise the birthrate to almost two, the only time it hit replacement since its precipitous fall in the late '90s and early 2000s." That is interesting when considering the birthrate in the 20thC:
    "The total fertility rate fell in the 1920s and early 1930s. After reaching a trough of 2.11 in 1934, during the Great Depression, it rose until the early 1960s. The highest total fertility rate since 1921 was 3.55 in 1961, after which it mostly fell in the following two decades. The total fertility rate fell sharply after the contraceptive pill became available in 1961 and stabilised in the late 1960s. It had another steep decline after the pill was placed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme list in 1972. After stabilising in the 1980s, it fell in small progressive steps in the 1990s. Following a rise around the beginning of the millennium, the fertility rate reached 2.02 by 2008. It has been trending down since then."
    https://aifs.gov.au/research/facts-and-figures/births-in-australia

    So, it seems that birthrates rise and fall over time, but Australia's birthrate never quite "recovered" from the coming of "the pill". Does that tell us anything ?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hide the remote! Gerard’s been a naughty boy and has been watching “Insiders” on the conservative-free ABC again.

    Savva's “A loss, is a loss, is a loss” must have really hurt, especially coming from a committed Liberal.

    As for delusional, looks like Gerard is delusional. The evidence of the denial was clear when, while introducing Nathan Conroy to do his concession speech, Sussan Ley talked as if the Liberals had won rather than lost and finished by saying it wasn’t over yet. It must have been a hard slog for Conroy; what was he supposed to say to the constituents of Dunkley: “We haven’t got any policies, but I’ll be better than the other candidate.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed. I'll see if I can find the reference again, but the proposition was that people aren't voting for policies (if they ever did) or even people, but just for 'parties'. Certainly wouldn't think that in reference to Trump - that's purely a 'person' vote - but mainly not in reference to Biden either - nobody much seems to take any notice of his policies though and mostly seem to think that none of them are working.

      On the other hand, in Australia people mostly rejected Bill Shorten the second time for his policies - many of which are now being resurrected. Or was he really rejected just because he's Bill Shorten ? Though he very nearly did beat Turnbull and why was that ?

      Or maybe it's just a mix: if people really love a policy, they'll vote for it; if people really love a person, they'll vote for him, or maybe occasionally her, and otherwise, they'll just close their minds, and vote for their party.

      Delete
    2. We are talking about elections here, GB. It has nothing to do with liking a person as in liking their personality, which may get by in friendships, but not in politics. People only "love" candidates like Trump and Joyce because they regard those politicians as one of themselves, espousing the same views as themselves. The media can talk of the "jolly Joe" and " affable Josh" personalities, but the electors vote according to their own interests and viewpoints on what policies relate to themselves. not the candidate themselves. The policies may be phoney, not actually representing those voters, but just taking them for a ride, but that still influences people's vote.

      Delete
    3. Well I wasn't thinking in terms of 'real' friends, Anony, but I reckon we'd both have to note that people will vote for Trump regardless of anything he says or does and his 'policies' and party are just minor bonuses if of any particular notice at all. That counts as a form of 'friendship' for mine.

      Delete
  4. "Is "Ned" suggesting that the Donald is the least of the worst scenarios?" You mean like maybe he's suggesting that Spud is "the least of the worst scenarios" for Australia ?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Oh my, how times have changed:

    We are living in a golden age of light bulbs
    https://jabberwocking.com/we-are-living-in-a-golden-age-of-light-bulbs

    And we were there for all of that, weren't we.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Does anyone even care anymore?"

      I do. Obtaining very-low-watt (<3W) LED GLS bulbs is nigh on impossible. Still.

      Delete
    2. Well nothing is ever perfect, mate, not even heaven.

      Delete
  6. That 'Tom Tomorrow' was well worth another run, and, in turn, worth the Orwell reference. From Winston and Julia's first time alone, in the little copse in the country.

    ‘It’s this bloody thing that does it,’ she said, ripping off the scarlet sash of the Junior Anti-Sex League, and flinging it on to a bough. . . . .

    ‘Actually I am that sort of girl, to look at. I’m good at games. I was a troop-leader in the Spies. I do voluntary work three evenings a week for the Junior Anti-Sex League. I’ve spent hours and hours pasting their bloody rot all over London. I always carry one end of a banner in the processions I always look cheerful and I never shirk anything. Always yell with the crowd, that’s what I say. It’s the only way to be safe.’

    Who said '1984' was intended to be a warning, not an instruction manual?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Speaking of Liberals being delusional, isn’t Paul Kelly delusional? “Two flawed candidates”, he claims, as if there are no important differences, one being that Biden is rational and came across as both wise and resolute in his SOTUS, while the other candidate nearly always appears to be on something (I seem to recall a lot of Coke machines in early cartoons of Trump and I assumed that this had a double meaning – perhaps I was wrong?).

    Unable to criticise Biden’s speech, all Kelly can say is Biden is unconvincing; the unconvinced Kelly is himself unconvincing. Even if Trump is only 4 years younger, Trump’s personality problems loom far above the four year difference in age and Trump’s cognitive problems, where he seems unable to rationally think on even the most minor of subjects, have been far more pronounced than any memory issues Biden may have. All Kelly can do to promote the Republicans is produce a long, rabbling article going nowhere, except showing his own fallacious reasoning.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I recall that Abbott was unconvinced even after the Neg had been passed by the party room three times. It didn't end well for Abbott, and despite Polonius' optimism, I am unconvinced that the Liberals did well in Dunkley. Still, it's a good line - if you can't think of a decent response, say 'unconvinced'. AG.

      Delete
    2. Funny thing is that Ned clearly doesn’t consider himself a “flawed” journalist, despite being well into his ‘70s and babbling on and on and on. Nor did he ever show any doubts regarding the capabilities of the now Chairman Emeritus when he was still closely controlling his companies at the age of 90. A President who appears to be acting fairly competently despite being in his early ‘80s and occasionally stumbling over specific words is “flawed”.

      Delete
    3. According to his wiki "Ned" was born on 11th October 1947 and so is in lucky sevens turf.

      For examples of what some in the seventies can get up to, try ...

      https://www.salon.com/2024/03/07/dr-john-gartner-the-world-is-watching-a-fundamental-breakdown-in-trumps-ability-to-use-language/

      https://www.salon.com/2024/03/01/like-someone-pulled-the-metaphorical-plug-dr-john-gartner-on-accelerating-dementia/

      https://www.salon.com/2024/03/06/is-degenerating-before-our-eyes--maga-dont-notice-or-dont-care/

      That's not to defame oldies. That's to define dementia ...

      I feel like older people should take offense to Trump's behavior being explained away by aging. There are natural things that happen with aging such as occasionally using the wrong word or calling someone the wrong name because they remind you of someone you worked with. President Biden is confusing names, not people. The Dementia Care Society says “mixing up people and generations” is a sign of dementia. Recently Trump confused Nikki Haley and Nancey Pelosi, for example. He also mixed up the generations in his own family when he said his father was born in Germany, when it was his grandfather. Michael Wolff said Trump frequently didn’t recognize old friends. And most importantly Biden isn’t showing a fundamental breakdown in his ability to use language. The whataboutism narrative is that this is a race between two old men. True but one has an aging brain, and the other a dementing brain. If Trump were your relative, you would be reaching out to doctors in a state of alarm. If Joe Biden were you’re relative, you might have to remind him of things from time to time.

      Delete
    4. "...didn't recognise old friends..." Maybe that's because he has no friends, old, young or in-between.

      Anyway, Ned certainly convinced me, but I don't have a vote in America, so I can't make it count.

      As for 'reminding Joe of things', well I have to remind myself of things now and then too. Even the young have to do that from time to time, don't you find ? But most people - young, old and in-between - generally aren't conscious of just how much 'memory' they muck up on a day-to-day basis.

      Delete
  8. We all know that Polonius has a weird obsession with the ABC, but today it’s moved from strange to creepy. He’s reimagining “Insiders” to reflect what he believes the participants should be saying - and not just keeping it as a private fantasy but putting it out there for all the world to see (or at least that minuscule portion of the world that takes notice of him). .I'm not sure how to categorise this behaviour. Cosplay? Some strange variant on cyberstalking? What next - will Gerard start showing up unexpectedly at the ABC studios early on Sunday mornings, explaining patiently to the confused staff that he’s there to appear on the “Insiders” panel? Is it possible there’s a room in the Sydney Institute, to which only Polonius has a key, that contains a mock- up of the “Insiders” set that he can use to conduct his own version of the show, playing all the roles? It brings to mind Kramer setting up the salvaged sets from “The Merv Griffin Show” in his apartment in an episode of “Seinfeld” - or perhaps wannabe comedian Rupert Pupkin building something similar in his home in “The King of Comedy”. Hmm…. I wonder if Scorcese and De Niro would be interested in a sequel, featuring Hendo? Pity Jerry Lewis is no longer around to participate. Anyway, I await further instalments of Polonius’ delusions with a mixture of anticipation and trepidation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How to get back on the ABC:
      Tom: Gerard, you say you are a thought-leader, and your special subject is B A Santamaria.

      Delete
  9. We have another lemniscate running on women/working/having and raising kids - lead off by Dame Slap, and referenced for this weekend by the Angelic, putting her own, rather aggressive, aspect to having her 8 or 9 offspring (number depending on their still being recognised as truly part of the family). A reader might suppose that some of this might be related to a day and week devoted to the circumstances of women, but, step back a pace or three - and it is little more than identity politics, coming from those who write ‘opinions’ which regularly disparage identity politics.

    As it happens, it has been ‘lure the tourists up’ week in our patch - Apple and Grape Festival. We had guests, who, apparently, follow the local member’s mumblings about how tough it is in ‘rural’ Australia. Noting quietly that we seem unable to put up the funds to buy Rupert’s papers, they, kindly, left this weekend’s flagship with me.

    So I scanned through - and found long column from Ms Ton-yee-nee, also on motherhood. She starts by telling readers that ‘I might have been robbed of the chance, but I applaud those who stay home with their own.’ She then tells us about holding recent baby of a friend, up to when her ‘eyes began to sting’ and she ‘went outside to my car and sobbed quietly and privately until the waves of grief receded.’

    But - tuffen up - “I don’t want your pity. . . . . The fact I was robbed of the chance to be a mother will probably be a bruise on my heart this side of heaven.’ And more in that vein.

    While this is revealing, and sad - Ms Ton justifies this exposure from ‘a sense of conviction . . after reading a particular line in Janet Albrechtsen’s opus las weekend on the beauty of choosing motherhood over career.’

    For all that - take those paces back, and it is more ‘identity politics’ from Ms Identity Politics herself. One doubts that she could produce a column if it did not reference her personal circumstances - even as she roundly criticises others for - advancing identity politics, to support their ideologies.

    Sometimes I try to imagine her, representing ‘GT Communications’, taking those early briefings from prospective clients. But I cannot. I suspect it could be like the people in several electrical supply places when my companion in life sought a new cook top. Every ‘sales consultant’ assured her that that cook top that had taken her fancy - why, they were in process of installing the very same model in the kitchen they were remodelling.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A free copy of 'The Flagship', Chad ? My but the ghods are being kind to you. As to Ms Tog-ninny, is there ever any explanation as to why she can't produce an offspring ?

      Delete
    2. GB - she just writes that she wuz robbed. Odd word choice, I suppose, and it must remain a mystery. Not to identify too readily as an unfeeling bloke, but I know from our own friends that there are options for otherwise successful women who yearn to have a child to raise. Perhaps those who follow her columns know the story.

      Delete
  10. Reminds me of another Oz...

    "Mrs Mary Whitehouse, ardent anti-smut campaigner of the National Viewers’ and Listeners’ Association said it was a very good thing that the line had been drawn.

    "Other published comments included: Lord Soper (President of the Methodist Conference and a member of Lord Longford’s unofficial committee investigating pornography) said the verdict was right, but the sentences were savage, unproductive and unjustifiable.

    "Author Kingsley Amis: “My instinct is to cheer anything nasty that might happen to this unsavoury trio. At the same time nobody should be sent to prison for obscenity — Whatever that is.”

    "Mick Jagger: “If there has been a moral crime committed it is by police and the judge ” .

    "The “Daily Telegraph” approved the sentences as a deterrent, and denounced those who protested against them as “spokesmen for the tear-down-society demimonde which infest our scene.”

    "A spokesman for the Young Member Group of the Conservative Monday Club: “We are grateful to Judge Argyle.“

    "Police are continuing to guard Judge Argyle’ s home following threats against him.

    https://www.smh.com.au/world/europe/from-the-archives-1971-oz-trio-s-brutal-sentence-in-obscenity-trial-20210727-p58dfe.html

    ReplyDelete

Comments older than two days are moderated and there will be a delay in publishing them.