With not the slightest hint of regret or any inclination to offer an apology, the pond decided it couldn't go there ... not to a movie titled The Blonde and the Liar and the Indigenous Child Used As A Warm Prop ... though the reptiles had the movie screening at the top of the page in both the tree killer and digital editions..
It seemed at least mildly ironic that at the time the reptiles featured a story urging an Indigenous watchdog with teeth, Dame Slap was trotting out a lying rodent to urge on the denial of a Voice ...
The pond's unhappiness then extended to the comments section ...
Not the doddering Doddser, or even worse, Monsieur Dupont on the US alliance ...
The pond dipped into Monsieur Dupont and down the bottom of the page came across this line ...
Authoritarian states will always target liberal democracies because they feel threatened by our example. Given a choice, most people will choose to live in open, tolerant and cosmopolitan societies.
Um, actually most members of the GOP and viewers of Faux Noise and supporters of News Corp prefer authoritarian figures intent on producing a blinkered view of history down there with foreign ministers inclined to be disappeared in dictatorships ...
The pond found it hard to take Monsieur Dupont seriously when it came across this tag ...
Alan Dupont is chief executive of geopolitical risk consultancy The Cognoscenti Group.
The Cognoscenti Group!? Yes, it really is a thing and you can read about it here ... but have you thought about the benefits of repeatedly hitting your head with a hammer instead?
With it looking like the pond might decide on a strategic withdrawal for the day, the pond looked beneath the reptile fold.
Fatal mistake, because there was a cartoon of the most insidious kind ...
At first the pond thought the obvious thing to do was to fight fire with fire and respond with a cartoon ...
There were any number of cartoons to hand ...
But then the pond began to brood, always a mistake, and a nanosecond's look around the intertubes found this in the EPA here (with graphs, figures, yadda yadda) ...
The extent of area burned by wildfires each year appears to have increased since the 1980s. According to National Interagency Fire Center data, of the 10 years with the largest acreage burned, all have occurred since 2004, including the peak year in 2015 (see Figure 2). This period coincides with many of the warmest years on record nationwide (see the U.S. and Global Temperature indicator). The largest increases have occurred during the spring and summer months.
Then there was this at NASA, a little old, but things have only got worse since it was written ...
Whether started naturally or by people, fires worldwide and the resulting smoke emissions and burned areas have been observed by NASA satellites from space for two decades. Combined with data collected and analyzed by scientists and forest managers on the ground, researchers at NASA, other U.S. agencies and universities are beginning to draw into focus the interplay between fires, climate and humans.
"Our ability to track fires in a concerted way over the last 20 years with satellite data has captured large-scale trends, such as increased fire activity, consistent with a warming climate in places like the western U.S., Canada and other parts of Northern Hemisphere forests where fuels are abundant," said Doug Morton, chief of the Biospheric Sciences Laboratory at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. "Where warming and drying climate has increased the risk of fires, we’ve seen an increase in burning."
And that's when the pond became enlightened.
The reptiles couldn't handle the truth, they had no idea of the truth. And the pond had been reduced to arguing with a wretched, profoundly stupid cartoon, drawn by a loon for a loonatic readership ... while over at the Graudian you might read Gulf stream could collapse as early as 2025, study suggests.
Meanwhile, all the things that had amused the pond in the last little while were still crying out for attention ...
Ben Shapiro's deeply weird meltdown about the Barbie movie produced great fun from Erin Gloria Ryan in 'Barbie' Seems to Have Destroyed Ben Shapiro ...
When he described the blockbuster film thusly: “It’s as though you were going to make Toy Story except the toys are all evil, they’re all bad, and you’re supposed to hate them and you’re supposed to burn them.” I thought: Ben, are you OK? Show me where the doll hurt you.
And so on, and the Barbie fuss has been a boon for cartoonists as well ...
Then there was the matter of the X-rated Uncle Elon, which has been producing XXXX branding fun, and the pond will fall off the wagon to drink to that ...
Now that's entertainment, and if you haven't used up your clicks, try Charlie Warzel at The Atlantic with Why Elon Killed the Bird ... just a teaser, with minimal spoilers ...
Her tweet is a near-perfect example of business-dude lorem ipsum—corporate gibberish that sounds superficially intelligent but is actually obfuscating. What is “unlimited interactivity?” How will X be “powered by AI”? Does she mean generative AI like ChatGPT or standard algorithms of the sort that have powered Twitter’s “For you” feed for years? The particulars are irrelevant: The words just need to sound like something when strung together.
Musk, too, is guilty of such blabber. He has argued that his hypothetical project, if built correctly, could “become half of the global financial system.” This is the empty language of a dilettante, the equivalent of me telling you that this article, if written correctly, is on pace to win the Pulitzer Prize for explanatory journalism, or that I am the executive wordsmith for The Atlantic’s Words About Computers section.
Well nattering "Ned" is back, which is a deep disappointment. The pond thought he might have quietly retired, or done an imitation of Alice's Cheshire cat, and all that was left was a trace of desiccated coconut in the tree ...
If it must be done, then it must be done and the pond should get on with the doing, though it's full of the usual huge illustrations, devised as a distraction ...
Now when you see a trigger word in what follows, deploy them as you wish ... you couldn't do any worse than what remains of a truly desperate and pathetic lizard Oz graphics department ...
But the pond will admit a sigh of relief at having reached the final gobbet, with both Jimbo and "Ned" adept at sending the pond to sleep ...
Actually, the chief challenge is to stay awake during a "Ned" sermon ... with the pond never having mastered the knack, and not having a clue how to get it ...
Meanwhile, on another planet far removed from reptile la la land ... though it might help to read Morrison government struck secret deal to pay PNG to take refugees and asylum seekers as a primer ...
Jayzusss, just look at the main photo on that tree killer edition of the Lizard Oz! A posed portrait of a former politician who unceremoniously dumped by the voters almost 16 years ago, but is somehow sufficiently deluded to believe he has something relevant to say. Everything about that photo screams of an effort to display the trappings of Churchillian elder statesmanship, but it doesn’t matter how many walls of leather-bound Hansard and other props you put behind him - it’s still just a decrepit old bugger propping himself up against a taxpayer-funded desk, dribbling on about “Back in my day….”.
ReplyDeleteImagine you’re someone under 60 who wanders past one of the dwindling number of retail outlets that sell this. Wouldn’t an image like that make you stop, think “I must get this - how else am I to be properly informed of what’s going on in the world, like what the banner at the bottom says”? Well no, it probably wouldn’t. Yet more evidence that the Reptiles’ business plan - such as it is - is rooted.
DO, how many mentions of Rhodes fires in the reptile rag please?
ReplyDeleteDP said: "At first the pond thought the obvious thing to do was to fight fire with fire and respond with a"... Quiggin.
(A wag whispered that "Disaster and Denial" are reptiles legal opinion protectors)
"Disaster and denial"
..."The conservative government of Scott Morrison, which had scored a surprise election win earlier in the year, made of botch of dealing with the fires (Morrison himself secretly jetted off to Hawaii for a holiday) and played down any role of climate, ably supported by the Murdoch press. Despite this, the denialist National Party retained its seats in most of the worst-affected parts of the country at the next election."
https://johnquiggin.com/2023/07/24/disaster-and-denial/
And thanks for the cartoons. How could anyone read all this guff without the light relief.
The pond tends to take the Quiggin as a given, though links are always appreciated ... everybody should have bookmarks to oases of sanity, before swimming with sharks and reptiles ...
DeleteExtreme wildfires are here to stay. Can human beings really fight them?
Delete"in a warming world, “there’s no technofix, no silver bullet or vaccine”, says Flannigan. “We’re in for the long haul. Dante’s circles of hell — we’re probably on level four and we’ve got a way to go.”"
https://www.ft.com/content/540fa28d-9590-4ea2-99d7-453e3e2c3086
Speaking of cartoons, Spooner strikes me as an even worse cartoonist than Leak. Young Johannes, once in a very long while, produces something (very) mildly amusing; and at least his intent is generally obvious. Spooner’s work, on the other hand, is both completely devoid of entertainment value and frequently so convoluted as to be unintelligible.
ReplyDeleteStrewth, mate, it's 20 years at least since I've seen a Spooner in an issue of the Melbourne Age. I had to go look him up on the web to try to remember who he is. I can certainly remember Petty and even Jolliffe, but Spooner ?
DeleteOf course (thankfully) nobody mentions Leunig these days.
DP, you missed the nominative deterministic Cognoscenti - Jim Crowe "is responsible for the development of the Group’s learning services".
ReplyDelete"Jim Crowe is a senior associate of the Cognoscenti Group and is responsible for the development of the Group’s learning services."
http://www.cognoscenti.global/jim-crowe/
Lesson? Learning? Tell him in this instance James beats Jim.
"The Jim Crow laws were state and local laws introduced in the Southern United States in the late 19th and early 20th centuries that enforced racial segregation, "Jim Crow" being a pejorative term for an African-American.[1]" Wikipedia
4th most popular tourist attraction in 'down south' Louisiana says:
"Paint-by-number paintings hang over our big River Road scene in the Exhibit Hall. Check out the oil refinery next to the plantation house - that's the way we do it in Louisiana"
https://abitamysteryhouse.com/exhibithall5.htm
Howard pretending to be concerned about Indigenous Australians and the Murdoch Sh#t show's fake caring advice, oh please, where is the vomit emoji when I need it?
ReplyDeleteWell here's a really good one, especially if you want some background on Gish(Gallop and Gambit) and you'd like to know just how bad Taibbi and Nate Silver really are. And whether or not 'Covid' was 'natural' or 'lab created' (go on, just make a wild guess).
ReplyDeleteEveryone should be skeptical of Nate Silver
https://theracket.news/p/everyone-should-be-skeptical-of-nate
Thanks for that GB
Delete"Inflation falls faster than expected. Has the Reserve Bank already increased interest rates too far?" What sort of a question is that ? Has the RBA taken to surveying newspaper readership just to find out if it has a clue about what it's doing ?
ReplyDeleteInflation slows more than expected, chance of an August RBA interest rate rise reduced
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-26/inflation-cpi-abs-june-quarter-2023/102648734
So, Neddy tells us: "One of the failures of political reporting over the past generation has been to treat Liberal-Labor disputes as a series of one-off policy differences when the real dispute was a sustained ideological conflict over the best means to promote economic growth and living standards - that is, over productivity." And just who, I sincerely wonder, is responsible for that ?
ReplyDeleteBut there we go, we have the words of that wise old man of modern journalism that it's all just about "productivity" like we are just a prime herd of cows fattening ourselves out in the sunlit fields of "prosperity". Because, after all, "political conflict no matter how intense cannot abolish the laws of economics." So "economics" has "laws" now ? Who drafted them and when did they get passed ?