Sorry, the Robodebt saga will happen later in the day, and that thread is a thread for another time, and the pond doubts it will ever get is threads on, just as it rarely seeks out the company of twits ...
Meanwhile, every so often the pond is reminded by Crikey that there's a whole world out there that the pond misses out on because it spends its time with the fluff-gathering performed by the navel gazing reptiles at the lizard Oz.
Not the serious stuff of the Maeve McGregor kind, The pernicious long shadow of Scott Morrison (paywall), despite the tempting hook, The political reaction to Gladys Berejiklian’s fall from grace reveals something sinister about Morrison’s enduring legacy.
Sure it's good to read, but the pond always knew there was something deeply sinister and weird about the clap happy, Hillsong-started-by-a-pedophile-loving SloMo.
No, the pond was thinking of a lighter offering of the kind offered by Charlie Lewis in Peak AFR: in a single day paper launches ‘prestige’ watch fair and argues CEOs aren’t paid enough.
Of course Charlie went to print a little too early to catch the latest news about the AFR, which featured a racist cartoon, which the keen Matt Kean dubbed a throwback to the Jim Crow era of the deep south. (Graudian away).
Naturally Warren Mundine lined up to defend it, but he should have checked first with the onion muncher, who quickly rowed off into the distance. (The pond doesn't intend to show the ad, but for those who missed it, the ABC ran it here).
Always phone home to the mothership Warren, and find out your marching orders.
The pond only ever visits the AFR to check on the latest Rowe, necessary now that Twitter is a strange land - himself in trouble back in June 2020 - but Lewis reminded the pond of what it was missing with this opening:
The Australian Financial Review occasionally wears the reputation of being a paper for people with names like Plutus P Moneyfellows, who wouldn’t feed what your family eats at Christmas to the hounds on their estate, who are so infuriated by the thought of baristas getting weekend penalty rates that their top hat simply flies off their head, landing in the caviar holder and comically splattering their dinner guests. There are days when this seems unfair. And then there are days like yesterday ...
Then he got stuck into it. There are copious links to justify his homework, but that's a reason you need to head off to Crikey.
The pond will simply skim the rancid surface:
While Australia struggles with a cost of living crisis, as housing and childcare services slip from the grasp of normal people, support services are maxed out and supermarkets brace for increased shoplifting of basic food items, the AFR snorted the headline “Why CEOs should be paid more” into the back of its throat and hocked it into readers’ faces.Perhaps feeling that the bandaid was off, that same day the paper also announced it was launching “Australia’s first prestige watch fair”. Finally, a chance for people who somehow unaccountably sleep at night to spend the equivalent of a house deposit on something that tells you what time it is, and a chance to remind Australia that the Fin not only has a watch editor, but his name is Bani McSpedden and he’s of the view that such an event was not just necessary, but overdue. It called to mind a few of the paper’s other greatest hits:
- Former New South Wales housing minister Pru Goward using the organ to share her views on “harnessing” the poor, citing non-specific “social workers” who “despair” at the working class’ “appalling housework, neglect of their children and, notably, their sharp and unrepentant manner when told to lift their game”. Notably.
- James P Gorman, the Australian head of Morgan Stanley, telling the gathered luminaries at the Fin‘s business summit in Sydney to “get greedy when everybody else is scared … Right now, everybody’s scared — there are opportunities”, while outside, the city flooded.
- The piece marvelling at all the “new skills” CEOs were mastering, thanks to the COVID-19 lockdowns, including mowing the lawn.
- And the last time it argued (in an editorial) that CEOs deserve huge pay rises because they were so good for Australia. Bonus points for relying on PwC as an authority.
It's fair to say that the pond cacked itself, and it turned towards the Friday lizard Oz feeling uplifted. Perhaps at some future point there could be a postgraduate degree studying the AFR's patronising devotion to the worst of capitalism. And bonus points for Crikey for the fun ... and it's only by coincidence that a little later down the page cackling Claire will consider offering indulgences ...
Meanwhile, as the almost forgotten Colbert used to say, what had started as a top of the digital page feature had quickly dropped down the lizard Oz charts ... but the pond decided to go there, at least for the first bit of this IPA good news, nuke the country to save the planet, story ...
The pond decided it wouldn't get it involved, but did wonder what the mother ship might have to say, and sure enough, there was Jennifer Hiller in the WSJ on 18th April 2002 under the header Utilities Want to Convert Coal Plants to Nuclear; Skeptics Abound, scribbling furiously States and utilities are looking at placing small nuclear reactors at former coal plants, but the technology and economics remain unproven (sorry, the pond doesn't link to News Corp stories, what with paywalls and the rest).
Unproven? Say what? And in just a little over a year they've been proven and Captain Potato has taken up the running?
Luckily Hiller provided a couple of notes about Captain Potato's IPA brain spurt (so many emissions, so little time). There was this helpful note from Jennifer ...
The burgeoning idea would place fleets of small, modular nuclear reactors at or near former coal-fired power plants and is taking hold across the electricity industry. Utility companies see it as a way to repurpose coal plants they are set to retire and are joining with startups developing the reactors, looking to tap into billions of dollars in federal funding.
Following lobbying efforts by industry, lawmakers in more than a dozen states this year are considering legislation that would open the door to coal-to-nuclear conversions.
Dozens of small-modular-reactor developers globally are testing designs, and Russia has two SMRs producing electricity, though they took years longer to deliver than expected. There are no SMRs making electricity in the U.S., and none under construction. At the earliest, U.S. reactors could be available later this decade. Supporters say the smaller-scale reactors could prove cheaper and faster to build than their massive predecessors; skeptics say the effort is a gamble on a technology with unproven economics.
The sales pitch is that mini-nuclear reactors could tie into existing transmission lines and electric substations, while former coal-plant workers could retrain to operate small nuclear plants, saving jobs and the local tax base. Nuclear fission can generate energy without greenhouse-gas emissions, and unlike other technologies such as solar, it can do so 24 hours a day.
Even proponents concede it is far from certain that the smaller reactors can be built faster and cheaper than existing nuclear plants.
“For us that may be the most important question, and one that should be asked and discussed openly,” said Jeff Lyash, chief executive of the Tennessee Valley Authority, which oversees power generation for a large part of the mid-South....
And there was this, more hesitations and uncertainties, and in the mother ship of the Murdochian empire ...
“We can have a lot more solar and wind in our portfolio, and then have the backup and reliability,” Mr. Hunter said.
Developers will have to navigate a complex licensing process at the U.S. government’s Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Most planned projects have delivery dates that begin later this decade, a timeline that misses many coal shutdowns. About 6% of the coal-fired generating capacity that was operating at the end of 2021 is expected to retire this year, around 12.6 gigawatts, according to the federal government.
“This is in many respects a false solution to climate change because it’s not ready yet,” said
Kerwin Olson, executive director at the Citizens Action Coalition in Indiana, a consumer watchdog group with concerns that customers, not companies, will bear the costs of proving up the economics and technology of new nuclear reactors.
Some SMRs would use light water as a coolant, a design used in existing U.S. nuclear-power plants, while others would use novel fuels or cooling systems involving gas, molten salt or liquid metal.
Edwin Lyman, director of nuclear-power safety at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said projects would pose some level of risk to communities, and some say local opposition is a potential hurdle to new nuclear plants
U.S. customers have soured on building large, conventional plants. Just one large nuclear plant is under construction in the U.S.:
Southern Co. ’s expansion of its Vogtle facility in Georgia, more than five years delayed and billions of dollars over its initial projected cost. Nuclear power also generally has high maintenance costs and requires more security and workers than other kinds of power plants. Many plants are being closed or decommissioned as they face competition from lower-cost natural-gas plants, wind and solar, and unresolved questions about permanent waste storage...
By golly, if the pond keeps doing this every time it stumbles across a reptile mention of "woke", it could wear a bit thin ...
Did cackling Claire just spend all that time bashing big business, only to conclude that indulgences might actually work, and you might end up in heaven, or at least you could wash away some of your sins, and it would be money well spent?
Well the pond did warn it would be a waste of time, that's what happens when you indulge bubble-headed boobies, and speaking of a good washing, now to anticipate the apology ...
Ah, good old Henry. Rather than drawing the obvious conclusion that the findings of corrupt but not criminal behaviour against Our Glad demonstrates the need to criminalise such behaviour via legislation, the Hole in the Bucket Man instead thunders (or farts….) on about the unjust persecution of the poor lads. Naturally in doing so he seeks to justify his stance via a couple of quick TARDIS trips back to Classical Times and Georgian and Victorian Britain. As usual all the ponderous quotations and Latin phrases fail to camouflage the bullshit of his basic message, but that’s Our Henry for you.
ReplyDeleteWell done for citing Gibbon’s criticism of the impact of the Christian Church on the Roman Empire, DP. I recall that when I read Gibbon as a lad (admittedly only a condensed single volume edition) I was quite impressed that he managed to both express such criticism and to do so in a manner that largely managed to avoid condemnation from the powerful religious authorities of his day. I’d love to see Our Henry address this some day - but I doubt he ever will.
As for Cackling Claire, I share your amazement that New Corp wasn’t included in her survey of corporations that have exhibited dodgy behaviour. I assume it was edited out for reasons of space, or was affected by those “composition errors” that occasionally amend Letters to the Editor in the Oz.
Hi Dorothy,
ReplyDeleteThe AFR’s love of a fancy timepiece with its launch of “Australia’s first prestige watch fair” put me in mind of how fickle the luxury goods market can be;
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/jan/26/swiss-watch-sales-fall-10-per-cent-china-corruption-crackdown
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2014/04/09/no-more-shark-fins-whiskey-and-prada-the-strange-signs-of-chinas-corruption-crackdown/
Of course corruption of the sort requiring brown paper bags or even plastic bags to transport “gifts” couldn’t happen here in squeaky clean Oz;
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/feb/10/liberals-took-rolex-and-other-designer-watches-assuming-they-were-were-fake
"...the AFR's patronising devotion to the worst of capitalism" Yeah, that'd be why the reptiles smile so indulgently upon it, despite it being a once Fairfax now Nine Entertainment rag.
ReplyDeleteBut hey, as somebody who uses his $9 mobile as his time monitor and hasn't owned a 'watch' for well over a decade, it's good to be able to see how the haute bourgeoisie enjoy their fortunes.
No problem with where to put the small modular nuclear rectors - the majority of the electorate of Dixon voted for PD and so the reactors can go there, along with the nuclear waste dump. All those Liberal and National parliamentarians can offer their electorates up, too.
ReplyDeleteThe suggestion to locate SNRs in mothballed coal-fired power stations (would those sites even be suitable unless built from scratch?) did make me wonder how many LNP electorates would be affected. Even Liddell, which is located in the Labor-held Hunter is in a National-held State seat. I don’t think the local agriculture sector (including the Hunter wine region) would be mad-keen on a nuclear reactor just up the road either, particularly those folk who might make some cash by leasing out some of their land for solar or wind facilities. Still, I’m sure that Spud and Ted “Fallout Boy” O’Brien can sort that out.
DeleteJennifer Hiller: "Russia has two SMRs producing electricity, though they took years longer to deliver than expected." Oh no it hasn't: it has two small nuclear reactors derived from the nuclears that power Russian icebreakers, and they are on ships because that's the only way to get things like that to Pevek which is in ice-bound eastern Russia and has no roads or railways though it does have a civilian airport.
ReplyDeleteSo, despite being based on the established icebreaker units, the Pevek nuclears still, it's worth repeating, "took years longer to deliver than expected". And they are not "modular"; to be "modular" the reactors have to be constructed by assembling factory made "modules" (hence "modular") and no such factories or modules exist yet anywhere in the world. Though Rolls Royce, over-confident as always, reckon they might be able to complete the design, build and operate the module factories and assemble and install some power units by, maybe, 2030. Yeah, right.
Spud has claimed that nuclear powered submarines “are basically SMRs”. While I know bugger-all about nuclear technology, but my immediate response was “I bet they aren’t”. Because if they were, wouldn’t they already be operational, rather than still being in development? Surely the Opposition Leader wasn’t telling porkies?
DeleteYour "bugger all" is spot on, Anony; they both have a word in common: 'Small' and that means they're identical, yes ? Small - at least comparatively - nuclears have been around for a very long while: Rolls Royce, for instance, made their first in 1966:
Delete"The Rolls-Royce pressurised water reactor (PWR) series has powered the Royal Navy's nuclear submarines since the Valiant class, commissioned in 1966."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolls-Royce_PWR
They were (and are) indeed smaller than the nuclears built for domestic power supply, but "modular" they very definitely are not. Probably because the technology kept on developing and even improving so designing and making naval "modulars" was always out of the question and probably still is: the Navy always wants the latest and best whereas to be an economic success, the "modulars" have to be able to be essentially mass-produced to a basically fixed design for some years to come.
And they can't use the naval design anyway, because that would be giving away military secrets to whoever bought one (or two or three or ...).
Banking industry and other big businesses buying their way into heaven is probably a better bet than buying one's way into hell as many of the commentators at The Australian appear to want big business to do. Isn't heaven on the side of goodness and virtue and morality any more?
ReplyDeleteYou know that your opponents have lost the debate when they use the term woke in a pejorative sense.
In answer to your question, Anony, the reply is "no, it is not and never really has been". Just go read your Bible and contemplate a certain 'flood' that wiped out almost all of Trinity Part 1's creation - including most of the land animals as well as almost all of the homo saps - and tell us jut how virtuous and moral that was.
DeleteClaire Lehmann trying to link support for the Voice with child exploitation and wage theft is reprehensible behaviour. If big business were supporting the No campaign, she would not argue this offensive nonsense.
ReplyDeleteWell you know the reptiles, Anony: say and do whatever it takes to win the point.
DeleteBut all I can say is, what if all those corps cited by Eclaire did all those reprehensible things, and then didn't subscribe at all to ESG (no indulgenses) - would we be a lot better off ?
Oh my: Holely Henry's lede says: "Vague statues allow ...". Do we think maybe "Vague statutes..." was what was meant ?
ReplyDeleteAnd as for Chri Merritt's lede: "The fate of Gladys Berejiklian contains some worrying implications for every minister of the NSW government." Oh I do hope so, Chris, I do hope so. And maybe eventually for the ministers of many other governments as well.
The latter is a case of someone stumbling close to enlightenment, but, no doubt turning back before any damage was done.
DeleteThe “vague statues” which Henry refers to in his leader must be the statues of Publius Clodius Pulcher or Walpole or maybe George III because I have searched high and low, but cannot find a statue of Paul Brereton, the NACC Commissioner.
ReplyDeleteBut maybe ,,, So what does it take to earn a statue nowadays ? Just enslaving a few natives doesn't do it any more. Maybe taking a lot of test wickets will do it ? After all, Warny took somewhat fewer than Muralitharan but still go his statue.
DeleteI wonder how the News Corp rags will cover todays release of the Robodebt RC report, particularly in light of some of its findings (as reported by The Gruadian) -
ReplyDelete>>> Tudge’s robodebt media strategy examined by commissioner’s report
The royal commission report goes into substantial detail about how the then minister Alan Tudge used the media to counteract reporting about robodebt.
As the commission heard from Tudge’s former media advisor, Rachelle Miller, the strategy was to counter coverage in “more friendly media”, typically News Corp, in January 2017.
One such method was that Tudge authorised the release of case study information to a journalist at the Australian, Simon Benson, who then wrote a story with the headline “Debt scare backfires on Labor” on 26 January where it was described as an “embarrassing blunder” and called people who had spoken publicly about debts as “so-called victims”.
Tudge later went on 2GB radio and when asked whether he was happy that Benson had written the article, did not reveal his office was the source.
The report is scathing of Tudge’s media strategy around robodebt and attempt to silence those speaking out:
“As a minister, Mr Tudge was invested with a significant amount of public power. Mr Tudge’s use of information about social security recipients in the media to distract from and discourage commentary about the scheme’s problems represented an abuse of that power. It was all the more reprehensible in view of the power imbalance between the minister and the cohort of people upon whom it would reasonably be expected to have the most impact, many of whom were vulnerable and dependent on the department, and its minister, for their livelihood”.>>>>
I suspect that these aspects of the Commission findings - and possibly the entire Report - will either be ignored completely by the Lizard Oz, or mentioned well into the interior. Perhaps the coverage could be adjacent to Polonius’ column, to ensure that potential readers nod off.
Anonymous - from a quick scan of 'Sky News Australia' - it seems they missed the e-mail about the Robodebt report being released this day, so have not prepared anything on it. Even if they had known about it - it is insignificant against the dreadful denial of free speech in Australia to someone called Donald Trump Junior, with forebodings of what this assault on liberty could mean if the other Donald Trump finagles his way into the office of President of the United States next year.
ReplyDeleteDorothy - just for the record (of Stutchbury's steady repositioning of AFR into space being left waste by Limited News) - their print for this day has an 'Exclusive' (in red, lest that escape our attention) headed 'Regional votes a threat to the Yes campaign'. This also gives a plug to Freshwater Strategy, with which AFR has an association. This article has a 'Methodology note' that Freshwater Strategy interviewed 1065 Queensland voters, and that data are 'weighted'. Which tells us very little.
ReplyDeleteNow - Freshwater Strategy has been popping up with 'polls' lately, so a couple of weeks back I went in search of its founders and methods. Seems the head honcho is one Leo Shanahan, sometime Political Editor for Rupert's Flagship, and, I am fairly sure, one of offspring of the Bouffant and the Angelic, but of those still accepted into the family. If I have misplaced this Shanna, I apologise, abjectly, in advance. The rest of the people listed on their promo. website seem to have been trained by Sir Lynton Crosby, in one of the manifestations of Crosby/Textor.
But as team 'Freshwater' they are still a relatively new team in the league, and they are quite reticent about how they had managed to build up substantial contact lists for polling. Their website is full of PR phrasing, with just the slightest hint that their polling draws on existing contact lists, assembled by companies of longer tenure. So, very likely contacts gathered from persons with available time, and a desire to test consumer products in return for being able to keep the samples (oh, and provide about 7 pages of personal profile, each - just so we know you are qualified to give consumer assessment of a new formulation of toothpaste, or wrinkle-erasing cream).
Leo kinda moves around a lot, but apparently he's currently "writing a book with Joe Hockey". Now that would be something to stultify the passions.
Deletehttps://www.telummedia.com/public/news/leo-shanahan-returns-to-the-c-t-group/541k0kdmvw
GB - it is almost as if we need a 'Shanahan Watch', while this Leo multitasks, but always within the distinct network of Coalition/Crosby/Textor/Sky Limited News with steady injections from Fox. Will be interesting to see who might bother with publishing the Lion's take on Joe's stellar career. Apart from 'lifters and leaners' he did not delve deeply into political philosophy, so probably Connor Court.
DeleteHmmm, Holely Henry: "...finding that Gladys Berejiklian engaged in 'serious corrupt conduct'yet committed no crimes." Isn't it wonderful how things that ordinary folk find entirely 'normal' but somehow the reptiles are just shocked by these happenings. The whole idea that crimes are defined by laws but corruption is defined by accepted morality is somehow utterly beyong them - as though somehow there's only two kinds of behaviour they can grasp: crimes and not-crimes. That some organisations might have rules - yes, rules not laws - that if disobayed makes the offender guilty of 'corruption' but not crime.
ReplyDeleteThat simple proposition appears to be totally incomprehensible to reptiles, doesn't it. Except ... "if that decision portends what could be done by the newly established National Anti-Corruption Commission, Australian would do well to be deeply concerned." Oh, right: just normal reptile immorality: associate something you're very much against with something else you want to kill, and the pretend that they just could be one and the same. Fairly standard reptile corrupt behaviour, that one.
Henry again: "...narrowed the previously inchoate concept of corruption, centring it clearly on the misuse of office for private gain." Ok, so if I "misuse my office" but entirely for your gain, I have not committed corruption. And if then you should choose to misuse your officr for my gain, well then neither of us have committed corruption. Yep, that's definitely the reptile way.
WSJ: "Many plants are being closed or decommissioned as they face competition from lower-cost natural-gas plants, wind and solar, and unresolved questions about permanent waste storage..."
ReplyDeleteDP: "Oh dear, did the WSJ just say that wind and solar is cheaper?"
We signed away our rights with AUKUS, as 'we' - Australia - has to manage waste and decommissioning and storage of submarines nuclear fuel cell / population unit.
My inner cynic tells me that is the sneakiest move by nuclear proponents to make Australia have nuclear infrastructure.
So nuclear fanboiz (particularly US Navy) will be still be bleating - after our subs have died, probably after we have safe fission for free, still, after 2100!
And Oops!
(Tell'em they're dreamin'..)
"Highly radioactive spill near Columbia River in E. Washington worse than expected
BY ANNETTE CARY
UPDATED JULY 01, 2023
...
"The spill of highly radioactive waste beneath a building on the Hanford nuclear reservation north of Richland and near the Columbia River is both deeper and broader than anticipated.
"In a statement Thursday, the Department of Energy said the contamination in the soil at the Hanford 324 Building 1,000 feet from the Columbia River and a mile north of Richland is “much larger” than previously identified.
"Now the Department of Energy is rethinking the cleanup plan for the spill discovered 13 years ago, with work crews making preparations for the excavation of the radioactive material over the past six years.
"The spill of cesium and strontium in the soil beneath the 324 Building is so radioactively hot that it would be lethal to a worker on direct contact within two minutes, DOE has said previously.
"Radioactivity in the contaminated soil has been measured at 8,900 rad per hour.
"The plan has been to leave the 324 Building standing to act as a barrier to prevent precipitation from reaching the underground contamination and driving it closer to the groundwater, which moves toward the Columbia River.
https://www.tri-cityherald.com/news/local/hanford/article276863128.html
Oops .... oh dear:
ReplyDelete"The site hasn’t published anything by its correspondent-at-large since he was roundly condemned for a piece about Brittany Higgins."
Crikey’s silence deafening as Guy Rundle launches new book
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2023/jul/07/crikey-silence-guy-rundle-book-red-white-blown