And so the nightmare returns, and the pond needed a shot of comedy to help with its return to the lizard Oz, and it came in the form of an esteemed correspondent's link ...
Real news, honest views and dinkum spelling, and if you believe any of that, the pond has a harber brudge to sell ya ... and will take a modest down paement ... for this is the END, my frunds, the end of laughter and soft lies, the end of days the pond had tried to hide ...
Here, have a kartoon ...
And so the pond begins, and some might ask, why with the lizard Oz editorialist, and that's because the irony runs thick and deep with this one ...
Yes, after months of confected displays of hatred, of cultivating fear and loathing, of giving space to baying mobs snarling in a sinister way at the voice, the reptiles of the lizard Oz found themselves in awkward company ... echoing Senator Thorpe's anti-voice position ...
As usual in such matters, the irony flew over the lizard Oz editorialist's head ... but the irony grew even thicker ...
For months the pond refused to run Dame Slap and her race-driven hatred besmirching the lizard Oz - though precious little besmirching needed to be done for it to be fully and comprehensively besmirched - and now things have come to a pretty pass.
While still demanding more detail, regurgitating the venom of the snake-like mutton Dutton, the reptiles find themselves urging their sheep to consider the views of Langton, Pearson, Wyatt, Calma et al ...
But the reptiles long ago comprehensively fucked any calm consideration of a voice ... and not even a cartoonist could hide that with a placatory joke...
And so as the pond returns to the reptiles, it was faced with a dilemma.
Should it give voice to the reptile voices raging at the voice? After all, it had routinely handed Dame Slap a red card and thought nothing of it ...
Alas and alack, our Henry was one of the ones at it this day ... and all that could come to mind was a warped version of Hamlet ...
Alas, poor hole in the bucket man! The pond knew him, gentle reader: a fellow of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy: he hath borne the pond's postings on his back a thousand times; and now, how abhorred in my imagination it is! my gorge rims at it. Here hung those lips that I have kissed I know not how oft. Oh sickest of Freudian visions. Where be your gibes now? your gambols? your songs? your flashes of merriment, that were wont to set the table on a roar? Not one now, to mock your own grinning? quite chap-fallen? Now get you to my lady’s chamber, and tell her, let her paint an inch thick, to this favour she must come; make her laugh at that.
But sadly there's no laughs for the pond ... and yet look at the dismal choices the pond faced on its return ...
Well might Gabi gabble on about Ye, and his brand of hate ... well might Trinca tinkle on about gongs ... well might the lizard Oz try to plug the gaps left by the holyday makers ... well might the Price continue to be priceless ...there was our Henry's outing in the patented brand and form of lizard Oz hate to contemplate, and the pond couldn't shirk its duty ... and if it were to be done, it was best done quickly ...
Yeah nah, the lizard Oz has done its level best to encourage an epidemic of dystopian violence, and now they've discovered the company they must keep as a result, it's too late to shove that genie back into the bottle ...
Meanwhile, speaking of dystopian violence, the pond can at least end in the traditional way with an immortal Rowe ...
Dammit, can the pond just have one reading from outside the bigoted world of the reptiles, with this sampling of the text here ... as the pond yearns for a coup to unseat the sociopathic Vlad the terrible ...
And so the pond can keep on dreaming, and now to end with something altogether different, another blast from film schools past, in its day a revolutionary moment in special effects, now long forgotten ...
As you note DP, the irony is strong in this one….
ReplyDeleteStill, at least the Oz has come up with the perfect slogan for itself - “A Confected Display of Hatred”. I hope to see that proudly displayed on the masthead of every dead tree edition and at the top of the rag’s website.
Not bad Anon, and much better than "for the informed Australian". The pond could see the write up now ...
DeleteCreated by Sydney advertising agency Archibald Williams, The Australian’s marketing campaign replaces 2013’s “Search | Know | More” and the later "For the informed Australian" positioning, but builds on the insight that the news brand is a unique provider of agenda-setting news, exclusive investigations, compelling analysis, hard-hitting opinion and endless displays of confected hatred, fear and loathing ...
Full-page print ads, featuring striking photos out of red, include a provocative cartoon by The Australian’s Bill Leak, depicting an Aboriginal police officer handing over a wayward boy to his father who has forgotten his son’s name, a reliable way to convey a confected display of hatred.
To echo the boldness of The Australian’s reportage, print ads also include controversial Queensland businessman Clive Palmer, a celebrated purveyor of hatred, and images taken at Australia’s network of offshore immigration detention centres, a key source of hatred, fear and loathing.
The Australian’s general manager of marketing Alice Bradbury said the imagery, copy and art direction is “purposefully provocative and daring”, and looked forward to readers enjoying a daily confected display of hatred ...
“Consumers are being bombarded with content, sometimes of questionable sources, so trusted news brands are increasingly important in this market,” she said, especially news brands that deliver confected displays of hatred.
Make sure when they rip you off that you get a decent slice of the action ...
So "A Confected Display of Hatred”. There we go again: reptile attribution and projection. They are just so very accomplished at being totally unaware of what they're doing.
DeleteHow fortunate those silly French Jews were to have a Catholic abbot looking out for their interests, when they clearly had no idea what was good for them, Yes, that Western Enlightenment certainly got rid of antisemitism in France - although that Dreyfus bloke, the thousands rounded up by the Nazis with the assistance of local collaborators and the numerous other victims off of anti-Jewish politicians and media in the 19th and early 20th centuries might beg to disagree. Why, also, should we bother to consider modern issues on the basis of their merits when we can simply draw upon imagined precedents to justify ignoring them?
ReplyDeleteOur Henry’s ability to selectively ignore, distort and misinterpret history continues to impress.
Well Anonymous, I am sure we can agree that even our Henry would have been challenged to discuss religious divisions in relatively recent English history in a way that would have allowed him to conclude that such history was unfailingly inclusive. That 'Glorious Revolution' reflected strong anti-Catholic feeling, but there were vicious factional issues amongst Protestants, and much of the gathering support for William'n'Mary came from what were virtually warlords looking for the main chance. Yes, a challenge that our Henry has happily dropped into the memory bucket.
DeleteDo we classify Mary (Bloody) Tudor as "relatively recent English history" because she was very pro-Catholic of course. As those that she had executed could once upon a time have attested.
DeleteGB - in our Henry's time frame, Tudor times would seem like yesterday - well, if he could wring some kind of timeless Briddish virtue out of it.
DeleteHooray!!! Back with the The Oz......as it should be.
ReplyDeleteOh c'mon, Anony, it was a pretty good New Year's break, wasn't it ?
DeleteA little aside, on high quality broadcasting. Last night, Blot shared screen with Daisy, and one James Macpherson, who, it seems, writes for the Flagship, and 'Spectator'. The subject appeared to be the politicising of appointments of 'Australian of the Year'. After Daisy's routine over-acting, Macpherson went on about the outstanding first 'AotY', who he identifies as 'Sir Frank Macfarlane'. Identified him as an outstanding medical researcher, recognised around the world, while Blot nodded in agreement.
ReplyDeleteIt is an easy guess that Macpherson prepped for that segment with a quick scan of 'the search engine of his choice'. A scan so quick that the name of the outstanding Aussie medical researcher did not fully register with him. Neither was Blot - who otherwise knows everything - at all inclined to correct Macpherson.
That first AotY was, of course, Sir Frank Macfarlane Burnet - known more commonly as 'Macfarlane Burnet' - the name that is attached to several buildings, awards and suchlike, but not to the memory banks of occasional writers for the Flagship, or 'Spectator'.
The Macpherson/Blot solecism persists on 'Youtube'
https://www.skynews.com.au/opinion/andrew-bolt/first-ever-australian-of-the-year-was-an-objectively-great-achievement/video/8d857f1fe056e01a0edba5dc94a25db6
I simply offer that by way of reference - look at it only if you find Daisy's histrionics amusing (and you will find them amusing only if you have not seen that same performance several times before - over different subjects or themes, but essentially the same expressions and gestures)
Daisy always reminds me of a toddler who’s got into mum’s makeup kit. I guess the whole whole lot of them are like kids playing at being adults and not quite making it.
DeleteThat's 'Beautiful Daisy Cousens' - the love of Nick Cater's life - that you're on about there I take it, Chad.
DeleteGB - yes, how careless of me. I refer to Daisy as infrequently as possible (because nothing that she says is in any way enlightening) so I have not made an automatic link to the Cater when I tap in her name. Will try to keep that in mind.
DeleteI'd have included Leak as well, Chad, but we really shouldn't speak ill of the dead, should we.
DeleteOh, jolly Petty Peta: "Even if Australia Day is reimagined on a different date and more in line with respecting Indigenous Australia's ancestral claim to the land, it could be unrecognisable."
ReplyDeleteOh yeah, totally and completely unrecognisable - she's a gem isn't she. But hey, how long before she has to leave the reptiles in order to be Chief of Staff for Senator Tony "Onion Muncher" Abbott ?
Now here's a piece of ennobled moral wisdom from the Holely One: "We are not responsible for the Australia of the past, we are responsible for that of the future." He's a wizard of guileless gibberish, isn't he. But it's wonderful, isn't it: the moment something is done is the moment we become totally unresponsible for it.
ReplyDeleteSo, for instance, when Hitler died and WWII ended, there was not a single German anywhere who was "responsible ... for the past."
But hey, if we are "responsible for the future" does that mean we might just be responsible for correcting the present and ongoing defects arising from that "past" ?
No, you're right, of course we aren't: once something is done and past we have no responsibility for the correction or even just amelioration of its ongoing effects. So put away all those guilty, sentimentalist feelings, it's just nothing whatsoever to do with us.
Glad we somebody with the wisdom of Thucydides to point that out to us.
A little something from one of ours: from Amanda Meade's Guardian column today via Mike Carlton: "My Australian of the year would be a doctor or nurse working nights in intensive care or the ED, dealing with COVID and daily death. Real compassionate work. For very little money."
ReplyDeleteOh my, if that was the criteria then how many Australian of the Year titles would have to be awarded every year so as not to be accused of rampant favouritism if it's awarded to only one ? Can't make a whole hospital ward plus ambos the 'Australian of the Year' can we - and how many years would it take until 'Australian of the Year' has been awarded to everybody who meets Carlton's criteria ?