Yes, it's bigot day at the pond, and what better way to start off than with Freedom Boi's plight, and as that's a screen cap, a link to the actual story, at 7.30 here, and this ...
ROGER COLES, CHAIR, LIBERAL GARDENVALE BRANCH: Look, I would be stupid to say it's not an issue but the thing is I say to people like that, number one, Tim's never foist that down my throat, and the second thing about it is he's not the first gay Liberal to be in parliament.
Why next thing you know, we'll be having elevated Republican jokes about your foisting ...
Of course 7.30 came good by talking to the right people ...
PAMPHLET (male voiceover): "Tim's homosexuality is not the problem. It's his unrelenting campaign for gay rights and waste of taxpayer's money."
MADELEINE MORRIS: But voters in Goldstein say sexuality is just not an issue for the wider voting public here.
JUDY ROMANO: What's there to be fraid of? I think, yay, Tim Wilson being gay, that's fantastic.
Oh Madeleine, Madeleine, you just don't get it do you? This sexuality thing is just a cover for an unrelenting Marxist communist pinko pervert socialist campaign to undermine everything that's valued in Australia, including the Bolter as the world's preeminent climate scientist, and get us hitched to the United Nations' world government conspiracy ... and a handy distraction from gay SSM, while at the same time offering a piquant taste of what's to come in the $160m. public opinion poll ...
Oh Judy, Judy, yay?
Yay, is that your answer to it all?
Do you think that the reptiles would have wasted acres of bigoted digital ink dipped in venom and arsenic and doddery old white Paul Kelly harumphing lace, if all that was involved was saying 'yay' and that being gay is fantastic ...
Yay, is that your answer to it all?
Do you think that the reptiles would have wasted acres of bigoted digital ink dipped in venom and arsenic and doddery old white Paul Kelly harumphing lace, if all that was involved was saying 'yay' and that being gay is fantastic ...
Speaking of bigots, on we roll ...
Indeed, indeed, because Freedom Boi is part of a hidden agenda, involving radical advocacy which will degut the Liberal party, and everything good and normal about Australia ...
Now do you get it Madeleine? Now you do you understand Judy?
You don't? Seriously you need to do some corrective healthy reading, and as always, the pond is happen to oblige in the serious task of re-educating the tolerant into the many excellent ways that intolerance and abuse can be practised ...
Now do you understand Madeleine and Judy?
It's really quite simple, and the pond explained it to you yesterday, but we'll explain it to you again...
You see, being het is normal.
Bullying, bickering, sniping, white-anting, undermining, fighting, feuding and fussing is normal.
Not being het is abnormal.
Take Freedom Boi.
He's abnormal. He's not normal. He doesn't conform to the norm. He's a danger and a threat. Take him out to the toilet block and give his head a good flushing in the dunny. Always works a treat.
And just remember that all this nonsense about walking a mile in someone else's shoes... of understanding what it might mean to be gay, to be TG, to feel deeply threatened and abused, is just patent nonsense, a transparent attempt to make all the norms feel guilty ...
Trust the pond, the persecution of hets, like the persecution of Christians, has now reached Nazi German proportions ...
Look, in case you don't get it, the pond has called in the Bolter to offer some additional support and insight ...
You see, Judy and Madeleine, it's a Marxist scheme ...
And get ready to be shocked, surprised and startled ... these wretched people, these abnorms, are so content with themselves that these day they even dare to dream of having little versions of themselves running around...
Think of it Judy, wake up Madeleine. These abnorms might end up ruling the world. Where would that leave Cory, George and Daesh?
What the abnorms need to understand is that they're in the grip of a debilitating delusion, and they need a lifetime of professional psychiatric support ...
Because putting yourself in the grip of shrinks for an eternity is good for them, and great for the shrink business model ...
Who knows, if enough of them put themselves in the care of shrinks, we might have enough funds to return to the good old days of electric shock treatment. Ah how the pond's TG friends gaily talk of those great, life-transforming days ... shock me like an electric eel, they sing ...
And you know what Judy and Madeleine, you really should be aware of other, hidden dangers ...
Indeed, indeed, Judy and Madeleine.
Just remember that any attempt to take an interest in these abnorms and the next thing you know, you'll have caused Donald Trump to get elected.... though the pond hastens to add that teh Donald is very norm.
And so to the rest of Kevin ...
Shocking. How dare these aborms pretend in any way to be normalised ...
Just remember to trust the tykes and get them to pray for you, and better still, get them to fuck over the education system at the national level, and all will be well for the abnorms ...
Oops, did someone mention George? No, not that George or even Cory, this one...
Just look at that shameless hussy, and even worse, who told the cop he could dress like a member of the Village People?
We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. Any attempt by the aborms to pretend they're norms or normal must be strenuously resisted. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. The object of contempt for the norms is the abnorms. Now you begin to understand me...
Well do you, Judy and Madeleine, do you, do you begin to understand?
Think het, think straight, or the pond will send Kev to check up on your abnorm attitudes, and maybe, just maybe, he might foist his norm attitudes down your throats...
Remember, the world must be made safe for healthy, normal people with big hands ... who love marriage so much they try it many times ...
Oh what the heck, as teh Donald's been mentioned, why not end with a couple more TT's, and for those who don't indulge, there's always a TT at The Nation here ...
And now a song for Kev pointing out the complete futility of trying to walk in anyone's shoes ...
And while we're walking ...
Yes, it's Kumbaya weekend on the pond ... but given the alternative of Kev, George, the Bolter, or Cory, even a stiff Pina Colada and getting caught in the rain is sounding pretty good ...
And here are some of hilarious reasons the loons are giving to oppose Obama's Supreme nominee.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/courting-extremism-gop-attacks-garland-range-pathetic-bizarre
A handy link, though as usual, nothing can top WorldNetDaily ...
DeleteWND reporter Jack Cashill urged Republicans to grill Garland on his ties to the supposed “cover-ups” behind the TWA Flight 800 disaster and the Oklahoma City bombing, even demanding that Republicans ask Hillary Clinton to testify at confirmation hearings.
Indeed, indeed, and his links to fluoride and the magnetic death ray deserve close examination too ...
What is Donnelly the silly sausage on about, Maoist forces, or kransky again? What does he think is wurst? All is wurst! Anyway, there's that "long march" again: "...program illustrates how successful the cultural-Left has been in taking the long march and forcing on schools its radical views about gender and sexuality."
ReplyDeletehttp://greatermanchesternationalpatriots.blogspot.com.au/2012/09/anders-breivik-manifesto-part-1.html
..But what happens today to Europeans who suggest that there are differences among ethnic groups, or that the traditional social roles of men and women reflect their different natures, or that homosexuality is morally wrong?
..The only way any ideology can be understood, is by looking at its historical origins, its method of analysis and several key components, including its place in higher education and its ties with the Feminist movement. If we expect to prevail and restore our countries to full freedom of thought and expression, we need to know our enemy. We need to understand what Political Correctness really is. As you will soon see, if we can expose the true origins and nature of Political Correctness, we will have taken a giant step toward its overthrow.
..Were they able, our 1950s family would head back to the 1950s as fast as they could, with a gripping horror story to tell. Their story would be of a nation that had decayed and degenerated at a fantastic pace, moving in less than a half a century from the greatest countries on earth to Third World nations, overrun by crime, noise, drugs and dirt. The fall of Rome was graceful by comparison.
..The ideology that has taken over Western Europe goes most commonly by the name of “Political Correctness.” Some people see it as a joke. It is not. It is deadly serious. It seeks to alter virtually all the rules, formal and informal, that govern relations among people and institutions. It wants to change behaviour, thought, even the words we use. To a significant extent, it already has. Whoever or whatever controls language also controls thought. Who dares to speak of “ladies” now?
..Just what is “Political Correctness?”
DeletePolitical Correctness is in fact cultural Marxism (Cultural Communism) – Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms. The effort to translate Marxism from economics into culture did not begin with the student rebellion of the 1960s. It goes back at least to the 1920s and the writings of the Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci. In 1923, in Germany, a group of Marxists founded an institute devoted to making the transition, the Institute of Social Research (later known as the Frankfurt School). One of its founders, George Lukacs, stated its purpose as answering the question, “Who shall save us from Western Civilisation?” The Frankfurt School gained profound influence in European and American universities after many of its leading lights fled and spread all over Europe and even to the United States in the 1930s to escape National Socialism in Germany. In Western Europe it gained influence in universities from 1945.
The Frankfurt School blended Marx with Freud, and later influences (some Fascist as well as Marxist) added linguistics to create “Critical Theory” and “deconstruction.” These in turn greatly influenced education theory, and through institutions of higher education gave birth to what we now call “Political Correctness.” The lineage is clear, and it is traceable right back to Karl Marx.The parallels between the old, economic Marxism and cultural Marxism are evident. Cultural Marxism, or Political Correctness, shares with classical Marxism the vision of a “classless society,” i.e., a society not merely of equal opportunity, but equal condition.
Since that vision contradicts human nature – because people are different, they end up unequal, regardless of the starting point – society will not accord with it unless forced. So, under both variants of Marxism, it is forced. This is the first major parallel between classical and cultural Marxism: both are totalitarian ideologies. The totalitarian nature of Political Correctness can be seen on campuses where “PC” has taken over the college: freedom of speech, of the press, and even of thought are all eliminated. The second major parallel is that both classical, economic Marxism and cultural Marxism have single-factor explanations of history. Classical Marxism argues that all of history was determined by ownership of the means of production. Cultural Marxism says that history is wholly explained by which groups – defined by sex, race, religion and sexual normality or abnormality – have power over which other groups. The third parallel is that both varieties of Marxism declare certain groups virtuous and others evil a priori, that is, without regard for the actual behaviour of individuals. Classical Marxism defines workers and peasants as virtuous and the bourgeoisie (the middle class) and other owners of capital as evil. Cultural Marxism defines all minorities, what they see as the victims; Muslims, Feminist women, homosexuals and some additional minority groups as virtuous and they view ethnic Christian European men as evil. (Cultural Marxism does not recognise the existence of non-Feminist women, and defines Muslims, Asians and Africans who reject Political Correctness as evil, just like native Christian or even atheist Europeans.). The fourth parallel is in means: expropriation. Economic Marxists, where they obtained power, expropriated the property of the bourgeoisie and handed it to the state, as the “representative” of the workers and the peasants. Cultural Marxists, when they gain power (including through our own government), lay penalties on native European men and others who disagree with them and give privileges to the ”victim” groups they favour. Affirmative action is an example. Finally, both varieties of Marxists employ a method of analysis designed to show the correctness of their ideology in every situation. For classical Marxists, the analysis is economic. For cultural Marxists, the analysis is linguistic: deconstruction. Deconstruction “proves” that any “text,” past or present, illustrates the oppression of Muslims, women, homosexuals, etc. by reading that meaning into words of the text (regardless of their actual meaning). Both methods are, of course, phony analyses that twist the evidence to fit preordained conclusions, but they lend a ‘scientific” air to the ideology. These parallels are neither remarkable nor coincidental. They exist because Political Correctness is directly derived from classical Marxism, and is in fact a variant of Marxism.
Delete..Through most of the history of Marxism, cultural Marxists were “read out” of the movement by classical, economic Marxists. Today, with economic Marxism dead, cultural Marxism has filled its shoes. The medium has changed, but the message is the same: a society of radical egalitarianism enforced by the power of the state. Political Correctness now looms over Western European society like a colossus. It has taken over both political wings, left and right. Among so called Western European ”conservative” parties the actual cultural conservatives are shown the door because being a cultural conservative opposes the very essence of political correctness. It controls the most powerful element in our culture, the media and entertainment industry. It dominates both public and higher education: many a college campus is a small, ivycovered North Korea. It has even captured the higher clergy in many Christian churches. Anyone in the Establishment who departs from its dictates swiftly ceases to be a member of the Establishment. The most vital question is: how can Western Europeans combat Political Correctness and retake their society from the cultural Marxists?
..One group of Marxist intellectuals resolved their quandary by an analysis that focused on society’s cultural “superstructure” rather than on the economic substructures as Marx did. The Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci and Hungarian Marxist Georg Lukacs contributed the most to this new cultural Marxism.
DeleteAntonio Gramsci worked for the Communist International during 1923-24 in Moscow and Vienna. He was later imprisoned in one of Mussolini’s jails where he wrote his famous “Prison Notebooks.” Among Marxists, Gramsci is noted for his theory of cultural hegemony as the means to class dominance. In his view, a new “Communist man” had to be created before any political revolution was possible. This led to a focus on the efforts of intellectuals in the fields of education and culture. Gramsci envisioned a long march through the society’s institutions, including the government, the judiciary, the military, the schools and the media. He also concluded that so long as the workers had a Christian soul, they would not respond to revolutionary appeals.Georg Lukacs was the son a wealthy Hungarian banker. Lukacs began his political life as an agent of the Communist International. His book History and Class Consciousness gained him recognition as the leading Marxist theorist since Karl Marx. Lukacs believed that for a new Marxist culture to emerge, the existing culture must be destroyed. He said, “I saw the revolutionary destruction of society as the one and only solution to the cultural contradictions of the epoch,” and, “Such a worldwide overturning of values cannot take place without the annihilation of the old values and the creation of new ones by the revolutionaries.” When he became Deputy Commissar for Culture in the Bolshevik Bela Kun regime in Hungary in 1919, Lukacs launched what became known as “Cultural Terrorism.” As part of this terrorism he instituted a radical sex education program in Hungarian schools. Hungarian children were instructed in free love, sexual intercourse, the archaic nature of middle-class family codes, the out-datedness of monogamy, and the irrelevance of religion, which deprives man of all pleasures. Women, too, were called to rebel against the sexual mores of the time. Lukacs’s campaign of “Cultural Terrorism” was a precursor to what Political Correctness would later bring to Western European schools.In 1923, Lukacs and other Marxist intellectuals associated with the Communist Party of Germany founded the Institute of Social Research at Frankfurt University in Frankfurt, Germany. The Institute, which became known as the Frankfurt School, was modelled after the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow...
The techniques of political correctness are now well known: attacks on the curriculum in the name of “multiculturalism,” the imposition of restrictive and vaguely-worded “speech codes,” and mandatory “sensitivity training” courses for juniors that are little more than systematic efforts at ideological indoctrination. But the influence of political correctness has spread in other disturbing ways.
DeleteThe Origins of Political Correctness in Higher Education
While the ideology of political correctness is hardly restricted to our campuses, there is no doubt it originated there. The intellectual roots of this phenomenon stretch back over centuries. Ultimately, the origins of PC can be traced to the rise of modern ideology and its quest for power. In contrast to the classical and Judeo-Christian traditions, which stressed man’s need to understand the moral order and conform himself to it, modern ideologies have sought to dominate and control the world. In the twentieth century these ideologies gained political power in Communist states. But in the West, ideology has not been able to make such a direct assault on our traditions of ordered liberty. Rather, radical intellectuals have sought to undermine the foundations of knowledge itself, concentrating their efforts on the transformation of the university. The turning point in the academy came in the 1960s, when militant students launched a guerrilla attack on the traditions of Western culture and the liberal arts. Seeing that they could not gain lasting power through demonstrations alone, many of these militants opted to remain “in the system,” going on to become professors themselves. This generation of “Cultural Marxist radicals” has now become the establishment in the vast majority of our institutions of higher learning. As university head masters, deans, and department chairmen, they have set about hiring other ideologues in their own image and have instigated the repressive policies we know as political correctness. These politicised academics will be extremely difficult to dislodge from their current positions of power...
---
Erich Fromm, Wilhelm’s Reich, Leon Trotsky, Carl Grünberg, Max Horkheimer, Herbert Marcuse - “Make Love, Not War.”, Betty Friedan, Friedrich Engels, Theodor Adorno, Benjamin Bloom, Jacques Derrida, Angela Davis, Sigmund Freud, George Orwell - of course, a lengthy reading list... On and on it goes... I'm afraid it then does go on to feature a detailed history at length of all Arabic/Muslim conquest and expansion - genocide heaped on genocide, crime on detailed crime - be afraid, clearly that's very afraid.
That's all crap about cultural Marxism being PC and marching anywhere.
DeleteOur culture is changing because politically correct conservative culture sucks and people realize that the social engineering conservatives do really sucks and creates damaged and confused children who grow into unhappy adults.
Much more PC is needed or maybe Marx had the answer?
"That's all crap about cultural Marxism being PC and marching anywhere..."
DeleteSure, but that's the drum the IPA, hard right LNP types, reactionary religionists, and numerous reptiles have been banging increasingly louder and in recent times. I've been wondering how they rope in so many seemingly unconnected things, and yet all these nut jobs are doing it in a consistent way, expressing it in a consistent way... phrases like "the long march" and calls to adopt a "long march" themselves to destroy their perceived enemies caught my eye. Where is the single link between Marx and Islam and marriage equality and the West and "long march" and sexuality and and and and the fall of civilization etc that they claim? The single link? I know crazy doesn't have to make sense, but it begins to seem their is much method in their madness, in their reactionary fight. This smacked of organisation, of resources known to them, of some kind of crafted manifesto, some kind of unified body of work they draw on and pass around rather than these arsehats just babbling and raving to each other when they get together around the world and then all go off singing the words from the same song sheet. There may be a better backgrounding source than the above that pulls near all their horrors together, but I haven't come across it. There's got to be a better formatted source though, and, surely there has to be a good source that has exposed and explained all this emergent contemporary rwnj cohesion.
I think I get it now though, and think I know the contemporary enemy much better. The crafty bastards.
We can all cut and paste gobbets of ideological ratbaggery.
ReplyDeletePiss off.
Ignore them, DP. Please stick around and keep on truckin'.
DeleteWell it is a pond for loons, though that unseemly collection of unreadable gobbets is testing the patience of the moderator ... after all, it's hardly news that Kevin and David Duke are on the same planet when it comes to political correctness.
Delete'Hey you guys, can you stop bullying me please?. At this moment in my life, as a 14 year old, I am identifying myself as same-sex attracted. But the vast majority of kids "grow out" of this and end up being - well, normal. So, there is a really good chance that your current bullying efforts are wasted, and might it not be prudent to wait a few years to see which way I... um... turn?'
ReplyDeleteAh, Joe South. Nice. He said it all earlier...
ReplyDeletehttps://youtu.be/nvzGAW4BB34
Now that's a blast from the past ...
Delete