Friday, March 29, 2024

In which the pond begins Ēostre with the reptiles and an exceptionally mind-numbing outing from a pontificating, portentous, pompous prof emeritus ...

 

'Tis the season, so let us prey ...




The pond doesn't usually start with a nod to Colbert, but 'tis the season, and the reptiles have sent in their second eleven, with the AJN occupying the top far right slot in the digital edition ...




Instead of verbose referential Henry of hole in buckets fame, the reptiles sent in a second eleven prof to occupy the middle space of the digital edition ... and the pond knew its Ēostre duty ... checking only to make sure that there was nothing essential in the reptiles lurking beneath the fold ...




Nah, just The Mocker, held over from yesterday to keep the celebration of the orange Jesus going, the WSJ pressed in to service to fill in our Henry's loss, some blather about NZ and some nonsensical balther about sustainable aviation fuel - as if anyone cared about the cult of climate science after reading the lizard Oz. 

Throw in Kirby preaching money skills, as if four payments of $19.95 weren't enough - disciples are standing by at the lizard Oz for your subscription - and the offering of the usual simpleton "here no conflict of interest" Simon, and after that quick glance, the pond knew it could throw the lot away, it being a holiday and all.

No point dilly dallying, best get on with the pretentious pontificating prof ...




Of course it's deeply offensive. That's the entire point of this long-winded troll ...

Meanwhile, with the prof apparently in de nile about what's currently happening in Gaza ...




Talk about the finest flowering of Western Civilisation and culture clashes ... and there's more news here for anyone, apart from the prof, who might care to check if they don't mind an Ēostre depression ...





Meanwhile, the prof is so far up himself,  he invokes, in a masturbatory way of which the man himself would approve, Rousseau (with bonus Marx) ...




For some reason, the reptiles decided to undercut the prof with the illustrative snap ...





If we're taking a break from the pontificating prof, the pond might note that there was other news from the West Bank ...







The prof was still busy masturbating over his book learning, in the Rousseau way ... which is to say deploring the hand while deploying the hand ...




Indeed, indeed, that'd be. the mainstream Western consciousness that produced the first world war...







Around this point, the pond began to flail about and think of other things, anything to avoid dwelling on the genocide. 

The infallible Pope, for example, was in tune with the spirit of the season...






And what about a distraction from the genocide with a wondrous loon from the west, thanks to Rob Harris for Australian councillor praises Vladimir Putin’s election win on Russian TV...

The pond never pays enough attention to sandgroper news, and rarely panders to its sole sandgroper reader and correspondent, but this was a doozy, what you might call full Tamworth, and the pond can think of no higher praise ...

London: A regional West Australian councillor has appeared in a bizarre video on Russian state-owned TV, congratulating President Vladimir Putin on his election victory.
Adrian McRae, who was elected to the Port Hedland council in early March and has not yet been sworn in, was reportedly flown to Moscow as part of an international delegation to observe the presidential elections.
In a video published by Channel One State News, McRae congratulated Putin on his win and hailed it as the most transparent in the world.
“Can I please pass on my most sincere congratulations to Mr Vladimir Putin,” he said.
“In my lifetime, the world has never seen such a transparent and comprehensive victory as what we saw here over the last three days.”
(Photo) McRae said he received a Badge of Honour, the highest award of the International Slavic Academy, from opposition candidate Sergey Baburin.
Australia’s Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the result was an “insult to democracy”, while British Foreign Secretary David Cameron said it had underlined the depth of repression of Putin’s regime, which “seeks to silence any opposition to his illegal war”.
McRae contested the last federal election as a candidate for The Great Australian Party, founded by former WA senator and conspiracy theorist Rod Culleton, in the seat of Durack.
He said later he had travelled to Russia as an “independent international observer” after being invited by Russian Ambassador to Australia Aleksey Pavlovsky.
“I was invited to Moscow to participate in an international delegation,” he said.
The Russian embassy told the ABC that McRae, along with many other foreign nationals, took part in the election observation program during the elections of the president of the Russian Federation.
From Russia, McRae told regional newspaper North West Telegraph that he could “write for hours” about “the most ridiculously over-the-top transparency” he witnessed as part of the election process.
“Having run as a candidate in both Australian federal and local government elections, as well as volunteering as a scrutineer for national elections and referendums, I was truly shocked by Russia’s transparency... It leaves the Australian system in its wake.”
Following the election, pro-Putin activist Simeon Boikov, known by his moniker “Aussie Cossack”, posted images of McRae receiving an award — the Badge of Honour — from opposition candidate Sergey Baburin, which he said was “for his efforts in strengthening friendship between Australia and Russia”.
Town of Port Hedland chief executive Carl Askew told the North West Telegraph that McRae had travelled in a personal capacity.
“The town does not comment on the personal activities of elected members,” he said. “All elected members are subject to the town’s code of conduct.”

Must be something in the water, but there was other good news, thanks to Crikey and Charlie Lewis, What the hell has Tim Wilson been up to lately (other than tweeting cringe)? (paywall).

The pond hadn't thought in many a long month about freedumb boy and what a splendid way to distract from a pontificating prof celebrating genocide. 

The pond will dispense with the smug ECU snap of a smirking freedumb boy and cut to the chase (sorry, you have to be a subscriber to enjoy the hot links) ...






But there's only so much fun allowed in any Ēostre, so it was back to the the collective displacement, the collective punishment, the famine, in short, the genocide, it being a proud part of the Western tradition, what with World War II and all. How the Germans loved their Wagner and their Beethoven as they went about their business and what joy there's been a new flowering of such a fine Western tradition in Gaza (cue ‘Mum knew what was going on’: Brigitte Höss on living at Auschwitz, in the Zone of Interest family) ...

Mum might have known what was going on, but the prof is completely clueless ...



For some reason, the reptiles kept interrupting the prof to show snaps of death and destruction ...





Well yes, there's been a fair bit of killing ...







Do the killing fields have any impact on the prof? Not on your nelly ...

'Tis the season for the good old Western tradition of cruelty dressed up in verbiage ...






Luckily the prof was starting to run out of steam, but not before mentioning Thucydides in a way that would have made the hole in the bucket man beam with pride ...





Or perhaps regressing into genocidal famine?






But of course the Western tradition insists that famine is sometimes necessary in the cause of genocide, so court rulings can be safely ignored ...






And then it was just one more gobbet of fine genocide-loving verbiage from the prof ...




What a wanker, in the Rousseau sense of don't do what I do, while I do what I do, which is to wank along to famine and genocide ... 

But the pond has done its Ēostre duty, in the original sense of that vexing "emeritus" word: 

In Latin, emeritus was used to describe soldiers who had completed their duty. It is the past participle of the verb emereri, meaning "to serve out one's term," from the prefix e-, meaning "out," and merēre, "to earn, deserve, or serve."

The trouble of course comes with some sense of merit, as opposed to meretricious tosh ...

(Merēre is also the source of our word merit.) English speakers claimed emeritus as their own in the late 17th century, applying it as both a noun and an adjective referring or relating not to soldiers but to someone who is retired from professional life but permitted to keep as an honorary title the rank of the last office they held. The adjective is frequently used postpositively—that is, after the noun it modifies rather than before it—and it is most commonly used to describe specifically those retired from a professorship.

If only loonish profs realised that retirement meant retire,  and they got lost, buggered off, or settled down to suck on humbugs while contemplating the view from their verandah ...

And so to wrap up where the pond started, back in the land of grifters who just gotta grift ...





30 comments:

  1. “Let me elaborate…….” - and so the Carroller did, at excruciating length. He may only be in the Second XI, but if - heavens forbid - any misfortune ever strikes the Hole in the Bucket Man, the Prof is clearly willing to step in on a long term basis. It’s all there - the pomposity, the transparent need to display the breadth of his learning, the lauding of the Western tradition (though not so much for Commies and the irreligious), and even a nod to a classicist pin-up boy, Mr T himself!

    Well done, Carroller - it must have been hell making it through your lectures with some form of chemical stimulation.

    A pity, though, that the Prof doubtless submitted his piece before he had a chance to see the Graudian article GB kindly linked in yesterday’s comments, discussing the role of slaves in the development and spread of early Christian scriptures. With any luck the Prof - or perhaps Our Henry - might use that claim as a springboard for a future discussion of the usefulness of slavery in building the Western tradition.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "some blather about NZ" Oh yeah, the greiving Greaves:
    "...Christopher Luxon's official residence and olane in disrepair and cracks showing in his coalition." So soon ? Chris only became NZ PM in last October - not even half a year up yet.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Carroll just asked the wrong question. According to Jesus, a Christian should ask 'how should I live in a way that gives benefit to others'. Perhaps if he'd asked that question, he would have got a different answer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Carroll: "[Israel] must do so without inflicting an unreasonable level of death and destruction in Gaza...". So the present "level" of death and destruction is clearly considered eminently "reasonable" and even 'Christian' then ? Well, considering the history of Christianity and Christians and Western civilisation, it is surely eminently reasonable, isn't it.

      Delete
  4. Re the supposed gravity and of course the celebration of the brutal murder of Jesus and keeping religion in its own domain separate from politics this reference demolishes Carroll's pretentious posturing.
    http://godblesstheusbible.com

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Bouffant One, in all his gussied up glory cunningly waited for you to drop today's Loonpond, before releasing this piece of crap on the Ozz, such is the fear he has of you Dorothy.

    Albanese risks epithet of our ‘worst PM since Whitlam’

    The Prime Minister’s preference for politics over policy leads to unfavourable comparisons with another Labor leader, particularly among voters aged over 60 – a considerable cohort.
    58 minutes ago By Dennis Shanahan

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can only read the online Headline, as not a cent from this house goes to the Reptiles.
      Thank you for your service.

      Delete
    2. Ta Sully the pond noted that, and for a moment thought about making it a feature tomorrow, if only to note how it reaffirms the geriatric nature of the reptiles and their readership.

      How many vulgar youffs know or could give a toss about Gough? Even a reference to former chairman Rudd or Juliar would now seem quaint, though perfectly at home in the reptile hive mind.

      As for Gough, the pond quite liked the way he shook up things, though he had a few truly weird ministers. His greatest triumph was to see the Head Prefect who replaced him in good time disavow his former self and coalition policies, and adopt Goughism, a kind of deviant left rhetoric that routinely sent the reptiles into a tail spin ...

      Such are the ironies of life, about which the bouffant one, head up myopic DLP Catholic bum, will never have a clue ...

      Delete
    3. As you mention Gough and Fraser DP, your sole sandgroper reader and correspondent had the job of opening Kerrs car door during his visit to a north west town in 76.

      Delete
    4. “Voters over 60”? I think the Bouffant One severely underestimates the average age of his target audience.

      I suppose it would be churlish to enquire the source of the data on which Shanners bases his claim. A comprehensive survey of several thousand voters, I assume? Or a newsroom straw poll of the Saturday arvo shift, or Friday night drinks? Or perhaps Angie has reported back on the chat from the latest Parish Ladies’ afternoon tea.

      Whatever the source, just more blather from a Reptile time-server.

      Delete
  6. So the Carroll tells us that there are (just) two questions which confront all humans, everywhere and in all ages. One question supposedly is ‘what happens when I die’.

    Further on - the Carroll tells us that ‘knowledge and faith are quite distinct categories, or realities.’ Realities? If you want to apply knowledge to that supposedly fundamental question of ‘what happens when I die’, we know nothing other than that when we die, our thinking processes are terminated, for ever. That has been amply tested by wiring up those who have died, to see if they can maintain some such ‘process’ after death. Nothing has come from those tests.

    Coming the other way, enough remarkable thinkers in physics have now died, so if it were possible to generate a message from that ‘after life’, they should have been able to do just that. But - we have received no message, of any kind.

    With that conclusion we can discard all directions made up by prophets and other living men (always men) who claimed to ‘know’ about the after life, and what we had to do to avoid being recycled as cockroaches, or having our ‘shades’ wander about in great mental torment, or having a facsimile of our body roasted for time beyond our imagination, but never being converted to cinders.

    I have to say that I do not see what the Carroll has given us for this day as being the work of sociologists. I thought they looked for ways to determine what people thought and felt as a way to conclusions about how this species, still subject to the instincts and behaviours that supported us as barely a few million hunter/gatherers spread around the planet, might live without too much pain and hardship as we increasingly subject ourselves to densities that few other animals choose. John B Calhoun’s observations on rats, published 60 years ago, could be more pertinent, if only because there were just 3 billion of us then.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "...our thinking processes are terminated" I was going to object because we still have a mind even if we don't have a brain, so we can still think. But then I remembered that our 'mind' is just totally absorbed with us ecstatically, and without pause, singing God's praises with our spiritual voices - since we don't have lungs and vocal chords to do it with.

      Delete
    2. Quite so, GB - I should have taken more care with my terms there. See you at harp practice.

      Delete
  7. Sixty Buck Bibles!

    Okay all you MAGAts
    Gotta buy this book
    I have never read it
    But it's worth a look!

    It's a thousand pages
    Give or take a few
    And they say the story's
    'Bout some hippie Jew

    It's bound in plastic
    And it's signed by me
    And I'm short on kesh
    So ya gotta buy this
    Sixty buck bible!

    But I really like it
    'Cos I own the rights
    It should make a million
    for me overnight

    You all know my story
    I'm a flirty man
    But my trophy wife
    Doesn’t understand...

    And my kids are loaded
    But won't lend a hand
    So I need the bucks
    That's why I'm sellin'
    Sixty buck bibles!

    If you must return it
    Don't you send it here
    'Cos the biz is fake
    And that's why I'm selling
    Sixty buck bibles!

    ReplyDelete
  8. The truth of Carroll is that he has been given an emeritus for what, if that bullshit is all he is capable of well the poor bloody students.

    ReplyDelete
  9. From mention yesterday of Daniel Kahneman - John Quiggin has circulated this memoir (I have corrected an apparent typo)

    Daniel Kahneman, who was, along with Elinor Ostrom, one of the very few non-economists to win the Economics Nobel award, has died aged 90. There are lots of obituaries out there, so I won't try to summarise his work. Rather, I'll talk about how it influenced my own academic career.
    When I was an undergraduate, in the late 1970s, economic analysis of decisions under uncertainty was dominated by the expected utility (EU) theory of von Neumann and Morgenstern. The mean-variance approach, still popular in finance, was regarded as, at best, a special case of the correct EU theory. Some early theoretical challenges, notably from French theorist Maurice Allais around 1950 had been thoroughly refuted, at least to the satisfaction of most in the field. (A more fundamental critique by Daniel Ellsberg (later famous for leaking the Pentagon Papers) had been shunted into the "too-hard" basket.)
    The first big challenge to this consensus came in a 1974 paper by Kahneman and his long-time collaborator Amos Tversky (already a big name in the field of measurement theory) who found that judgements about probabilities were characterised by a variety of systematic biases, based on misleading heuristics. This set off a surge of interest in challenges to EU, including a revival of the criticisms made by Allais.
    One of the key ideas here was that, rather than take an arithmetic average of the utilities yielded by different possible outcomes of an uncertain, people might place more weight on low-probability outcomes like winning the lottery or dying in a plane crash. Unfortunately, the obvious approach of transforming probabilities into weights doesn't work. Think about a choice which yields lots of different outcomes, each with a small probability and a utility close to, but below 1. The weighted average procedure will yield a value greater than 1, implying that the choice would be preferred to getting 1 with certainty. This is obviously silly (the technical term is a violation of dominance)
    In 1979, while working on my undergraduate honours thesis, I came up with a solution to this problem. If the transformation is applied to the cumulative probability of getting an outcome less than or equal to some given value, rather than to individual probabilities, only the probabilities of extreme outcomes (like lottery wins and plane crashes) are overweighted and violations of dominance are avoided. This approach is now called rank-dependent utility theory
    In the same year, Kahneman and Tversky published the first version of a generalized version of EU called prospect theory. Among other changes, Kahneman and Tversky used probability weighting in the problematic form described above. They avoided dominance violations in a rather ad hoc fashion, by "editing" out dominated prospects.
    My own idea took the usual tortuous process to publication, eventually appearing in the (then new) Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization in 1982. It didn't attract much attention at first, but eventually got noticed by some of the leading figures in the newly developing field of generalized expected utility theory, and even byais, (by Allais?) who had returned to the topic after an absence of many decades. Finally, in 1992, Kahneman and Tversky incorporated the rank-dependent idea into their cumulative prospect theory, which became the standard version of prospect theory.
    To the extent I have any fame as an economic theorist, it's mostly due to this work. And, if you are going to engage in debate on policy issues, the credibility gained from having a (moderately) big name in economic theory makes it hard for rightwing economists to dismiss you.
    So I owe a big debt to Kahneman (as well as Tversky, who died before the Nobel award, but received a rare posthumous mention). He will be missed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "judgements about probabilities were characterised by a variety of systematic biases" - oh yes indeed, isn't that the way of all things ?

      Thanks for including the Quiggin, Chad, I hadn't quite considered he'd have something intelligible to say about K&T.

      Delete
  10. Replies
    1. Not that it will matter much because many (most ?) Israelis will still believe the Netanyahu lies and they don't much care about non-Israel opinion anyway.

      Delete

Comments older than two days are moderated and there will be a delay in publishing them.