Is there any more desperate, pathetic and meaningless abuse of the English language than to attempt to construct a radical centre?
The pond might as well attempt to construct a radical pond, or a radical doughnut (with extra radical cinnamon please), or an innovative radical centrist harness with which to work the horse ...
Of course, with the greatest respect, Pearson himself is in something of a crisis because he backed the wrong horse, got hitched to the wrong leader, and now finds himself on the radical sidelines ...
(and the rest of that story here).
Pearson has of late taken to talking how at 35 he made a mistake in his career path, and how he should instead of gone into politics, because he's gone as far as he could as an "outsider".
But he was never an outsider. He was just a gambler who backed the wrong horse. Suddenly, according to him, indigenous affairs is in deep crisis, but it might just be that Pearson is in deep crisis, and indigenous affairs is in just the same sorry mess as when his departed hero - now off to deplore teh gays and such like with his fundamentalist conservative Christian cohorts - started his showboating routines in the north ...
Never mind, it wasn't Pearson regretting the departure of the most singularly useless and radical politician to grace the stage in recent times that got the pond going. It was only the feeble attempt at a "radical centre" ...
It's ironic how something that gathered momentum as a bit of Jules Feiffer satire - with his invocation of the radical middle back in 1962 - keeps turning up like a bad penny as the 'radical middle' and 'radical centrism', as if Tony Blairism wasn't "radical ugh, how awfulism".
Never mind, the bizarre notion can be Greg Hunted here ... and it's time for a radical cartoon break ...
The real pity of this radical distraction is that the pond wanted to celebrate yet another contribution by the real radical brains at the core of the radical reptiles of radical Oz ...
Oh not that new old furphy ...
Sadly, the radical splash at the radical Oz doesn't reveal the radical origin of the radical bromancer's radical thinking ... so let us radical google instead ...
Yes, the great minds of the bromancer and Rush Limbaugh think alike, radical peas together in their radical pods.
It led the pond to thinking that Rush Limbaugh is to blame for Greg Sheridan, or perhaps Greg Sheridan is to blame for Rush Limbaugh ...
Or perhaps they've just fortuitously arrived at a shared monumental stupidity ... because this is what happens when you've got nothing better to do with your time than fill in dead air with drug-laced rants on a radio station, or scribble deadhead columns for the reptiles ...
Indeed, indeed, and if working in Congress is the way to get legislative experience, why that explains what legislative experience is good for ... stalemates, an inability to compromise and extreme devotion to pork-barrelling ...
The pond would have red carded the bromancer for a breach of Godwin's Law, except for the way that it gets its current dose of US politics from Colbert ...
You can watch that one here, and perhaps then you'd like to follow up with Colbert's A Simon & Garfunkel Tune For Every Candidate ... nothing says youth vote like a song from 1965 ...
Well the pond's still crazy after all these years, and one reason is reading the bromancer.
It wears you down, that steady moronic Santamaria-laced drip, drip, drip, and so we must turn to understanding why Obama is responsible for everything wrong with the world ...
Uh huh. The pond is beginning to understand. It's like the commentariat shouting out a deeply unhinged conspiracy theory that Obama is responsible for everything wrong with the world.
It's simple, it's understandable. It's deeply nuts, and the meme is essentially unchanged since the day he was elected president and it ran through Faux Noise and the reptiles of Oz like a virus-laden mosquito or a birther scam...
Thus far of course the bromancer has managed to avoid the actual requirements implied in his click-baiting, trolling splash on the digital front page, but now he must get around to it ...
And there you have it.
An infinitely stupid man offering an infinitely stupid analysis which absolves the Republican party and its many Murdochian supporters from any responsibility for the state of politics in the United States in this seminal year ...
Because somehow the readers of the New York Times were the ones that got Obama elected ...
Now it would be possible to get pedantic and wonder if there have ever been any other celebrity candidates, and not just a Kennedy ...
(more cartoons here).
And it would be possible to wonder how any sensible person could have voted for a McCain/Palin ticket. Lordy lordy, did they dodge a Palin bullet there ... much as some people still celebrate dodging Mark Latham ...
But the pond is weary.
Kerry Packer once famously observed that you only get one Alan Bond in a lifetime, so it has to be said that the pond is likely to get only one fuckwitted bromancer in its increasingly short lifetime ...
If the answer is Greg Sheridan, why did anybody bother to ask the question.
And so to a pleasant distraction ...
Yes, it's your ABC - it's not the pond's - at work once again ...
The infinitely stupid argument here is the notion that Tony Abbott jetted off to the United States to have an argument with the fundamentalist Christian warriors with whom he will converse ... and will somehow, by the cogent power of his arguments, convert them to the liberal, forgiving, gay loving, gay marriage approving side to which he belongs ...
But then Uhlmann has always been a dimwit, as can be discovered by Greg Hunting him and his early days in the ACT here ...
Once upon a time journalists believed in free speech and the quaint notion that it was better for Tony Abbott to argue with fundamentalist Christians and press home his support of gay marriage than to muzzle those who disagreed with him ...
Or some such thing. Time for a few old cartoons ... you should know by now where to find the cartoonists.

























































