Thursday, October 08, 2020

In which the pond resists powerful temptations to stick with the bromancer, the savvy Savva and a report on the Donald ...

 


Every day the reptiles present opportunities, and perhaps the pond should explain some of the ways it exercises editorial discretion over the lavish banquet of lizard Oz offerings.

There's always a couple of easy excisions - the bouffant one blathering on about philosophical differences will soon be put to bed below by the savvy Savva, and simplistic Simon trying to shift all the attention and blame on Albo is such a standard reptile mood, it wouldn't amuse a five year old ...

And then there was Kempy, out of hibernation to have a go at the Orwellian left, outing it with a "so clearly" ferocity, yet only recognised by the reptiles as a """ man ... so the pond only paused for this par of post-ironic inverted commas...


 

Yes, the """ man deployed inverted commas on health "experts", because ya know, he's writing a book about liberalism (long time coming) and he's an expert epidemiologist, and his idea of a sensible response to a global pandemic is a bit Donaldish, a man whose task it has been to bring wider human, social and economic understanding to policy, and what a spiffing success that has been ...

 


 

But should the pond spend time on Kempy doing a reptile routine that has grown stale by dint of repetition, and tear off the mask, and celebrate freedom and death, or see how the reptiles think the Donald is doing?

It seemed an easy choice, so the pond moved on ... only to land on a barrage of Bagaric ...



The trouble here is that all Bagaric could hint at was that the Vatican was deeply corrupt. Who knew? All he had was Italian newspaper reports and a suggestion of a vast international conspiracy involving the Pellists and little Victoria, but he had been graced  by the cult master, so the pond had at least to acknowledge that ...

And then pending further news on the international conspiracy - beyond the Vatican being at the heart of a giant Ponzi scheme and many conspiracies and Opus Dei delusions - the pond settled back with its usual favourites, starting with the bromancer, in his usual state of near hysteria ...


 

It takes considerable skill and effort for the bromancer to lather up a storm of worries should the Donald lose, but he's always a game, plucky bird, and is always up to the task ...


 

Yes, Trump will be right to argue, and a crisis is coming, perhaps as soon as November 4th if US voters don't begin to act sensibly, and the pond's only disappointment is that, for all the pond's introductory praise, the bromancer fudged it and dodged a bullet, and ended up the first gobbet with a very lame "I don't think Beijing will embark on a full-scale invasion of Taiwan."

Come on man, enough with the malarkey, the pond knows you like to go nuts. Why not call it as you see it? If the Donald loses, by Xmas we'll be in World War III!

Is the pond disappointed in the bromancer? Of course, but that's also why the pond loves the bromancer so, rather like a dimwitted child always returning with a report card full of "F's" in search of forgiveness ... and so, see how he tries to humour the pond by offering all sorts of hopes of games of chicken and such like ...


 

And see how the bromancer skilfully juggles with one hand his nonsense about US policies. 

The Donald losing is a grave threat, yet the Donald has been very offhand about Taiwan, but the Donald has been very helpful to Taiwan, and the fact that he's a total sociopathic narcissist offers a helpful unpredictability ... because you know, an aspirational dictator with a love of other dictators, especially Xi, is just what the world needs right now ...




 
Was that a complete waste of time, an exercise in confusion and conflation and mystification, and maybes and perhaps, and bad news and good news? 
 
Yep, but isn't that what the reptiles, and so the pond, is all about? Once again the bromancer has come up trumps, has proven his adept capacity to blather about an acutely dangerous period, code for what happens if a sociopathic narcissist happens to lose ...
 
And so to another Thursday reptile favourite ...



 
The pond mentioned that the savvy Savva had something to say about the bouffant one's blather about philosophical differences, but that sting is in the tail, and in the meantime, there's some snipes and a few cartoons designed to entertain ...


 

Indeed, indeed, but in times of trouble, the pond always reverts to the reliable Rowe, with more Rowe reliably to be found here ...



 

It's the best of all worlds, with the savvy Savva berating the boys for a lack of vision, and the boys hoovering up the loot ... and now for a punt, though not into mutated TDS ...


 

Indeed, indeed, but does the infallible Pope have anything to add?




Ah well there's always got to be a few losers ...



And there you have it, "philosophical differences" bouffant one ... "at heart, it's a budget Labor would have comfortably delivered" and yet, and yet ...





And so to the bonus for the day, and the pond admits it has abandoned Vatican conspiracies and Kempian desires to become a super-spreader of freedom and death, but how much Killer Creighton can anyone take, and the report from the US shattered everything the pond had expected after reading the bromancer, what with his stern predictions of chaos and confusion ... when it seems he merely meant to say that the Donald might actually be a perpetual bankrupt, a sucker and a loser ...



Say what? Where did all this faint-hearted defeatist gloom come from? Why the next thing you know Beijing will be invading Hawaii, or even worse, offering up a climate change agreement, something apparently that the Donald is desperate to do ...

Even better however, and a pleasure not to be ignored, the reptiles decided that this report was an ideal vehicle for a lot of click-bait videos, which the pond had the pleasure of cutting out, so that only a few words and a quick read remained ...




 

Oh it's all done and dusted in a few chunks of Snappy Tom fishy goodness ... and the pond never lies about what's good for your pussy ...



 

And now there's just one, slightly longer gobbet of despair to go ...




Dear sweet long absent lord, the odds are growing longer by the day, and who knows what might happen!?
 
 Why we might even get a climate change agreement, and to what avail, when we all know that the climate "experts" (hat tip to "" Kempy "") have invented a hoax and a fraud designed to line their pockets ...

And so ends the reptile reading for the day, and if you feel you've been conned and corrupted that little bit more, and wasted far too much time on prophets in the Murdochian temple, welcome to the land of reptile derangement syndrome ... but please, don't leave empty-handed, go with a last uplifting, tremendously positive, hugely inspirational thought ...
 
 





11 comments:

  1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdP8S0uKP5U

    Thanks, DP

    ReplyDelete
  2. You only have to utube Catholics for Trump to find out how loopy they are.They believe their church has been going to hell iin a handbasket since vatican 2

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It doesn't matter about being Catholic though, does it ? If you're for Trump, then you're loopy. Though I guess that being Catholic helps because you start off loopy and don't have to acquire it - and anyway, from having to revere the "popes of unhappy memory" (and isn't that all of them ?), Trump seems fairly normal.

      Delete
  3. Bromancer: "Trump's very unpredictability is a factor deterring Beijing."

    Has anybody informed the Bro that even if he wins this time, Trump won't be POTUS in 4 years time ? Does this mean that the US should only ever elect "unpredictable" presidents so that they can keep on "deterring" China ?

    But, butt, Bro: "So what might Beijing do after November 3, and why ?" Oh, just carry on with the usual for 4 years and see who gets elected in 2024, maybe ?

    Oh, but: "[China] could seek to retake some Taiwanese islands near the mainland coast. Some of these islands are unpopulated and Beijing might take them with notionally civilian invaders."

    Oh, just like the Dutch took Taiwan back in 1624 when it was still known as Formosa. But hey, Formosa had a native population - the Gaoshan people - and still has about 570,000 of them. To whom the Taiwanese president apologised on 2016. But it wasn't the Chinese who originally dispossessed them, it was the Dutch importing a large amount of cheap Chinese labour, which stayed on after the Dutch left about 40 years later.

    Finally: "Beijing deprecates US politicians, but it takes the US Navy, based in Hawaii, deadly seriously." Que ? Then it doesn't matter that Biden is "weak" because the US Navy is "strong" ? And it doesn't matter what Trump thinks or does because the Chinese "deprecate" him and only take the US Navy seriously.

    Truly, the Bromancer gets more confused and silly by the day. It must be because his bromance is so far behind Biden in the polls.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You have to remember that the Brom has no competition, GB. His scribbling gets loopier and loopier because nobody challenges it - well at least, nobody at The Catholic Boys Daily challenges it.

      It's a well known fact that political writers are usually limited in their craziness by their peers. You write something too batshit crazy and your peers will quickly let you know.

      But we all know the herpeterium has no peers, it's every man for himself (women can make tea in the kitchen).

      Delete
    2. Fair 'nuff, Merc, "the herpetarium has no peers". Yep, pay that one, though I reckon there might be a little bit of Trumpishness involved too; as in nobody pays any attention to you unless you are batshit crazy.

      There was certainly just a tiny bit of that in Abbott (onions, knighthoods and now British "trade negotiations"), so why not in his long term Bromancer, too.

      Delete
  4. As we have noted here before, the Swinburne Dean of Law (yes, Bagaric) is lead author of a work with the partial title ‘The circumstances in which torture is morally justifiable’

    So, for something as serious as he is hinting at - it should not take him too long to find moral justification for a touch of, er ‘rough interrogation’ of persons at the Vatican end, and in the failed state of Victoria. That should show the ‘roadmap’ for the trail of funny money.

    We need have no doubt that a mixture of the old fashioned techniques (usually involving burning to various degrees) and modern medicine, would reveal the truth - after all a Dean of Law has seen it as axiomatic that torture will do that.

    And if the Holy See would re-instate rules for witnesses from those great Inquisitions, the path to truth would be even easier.

    ‘A suspect, however powerful or distinguished, once hauled before the Inquisition, was judged guilty unless he could prove his innocence. . . .The evidence of wives, children, servants and persons heretical, excommunicated, perjured and criminal could be used against a man, secretly, and without their having to face him. . . . Perjury was pardoned if it was the outcome of zeal for the faith, obedience to a superior was forbidden if it hindered the inquiry. . . . No one was ever acquitted, a released person always being liable to rearrest.’

    Modern legal procedure could still apply from when the church process identified the guilty. As in the time of the great Inquisitions, the church did not actually kill anyone, and, ideally, no blood should be shed. There are several state jurisdictions in the USA who have experience in judicial killing without shedding blood. One George W Bush is credited (?) with 154 executions during his time as Governor of Texas - and he also proclaimed a ‘Jesus Day’ for that great state, so - all done out of deep devotion to christianity.

    Might one wonder if the Cult Master is either uninformed of the Dean of Law’s publications, or is he just plain squeamish? So much opportunity there for graphic symbolism.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fair 'nuff, Merc, "the herpetarium has no peers". Yep, pay that one, though I reckon there might be a little bit of Trumpishness involved too; as in nobody pays any attention to you unless you are batshit crazy.

      There was certainly just a tiny bit of that in Abbott (onions, knighthoods and now British "trade negotiations"), so why not in his long term Bromancer, too.

      Delete
    2. Ooops. Pasted the wrong copy ... sorry Chad. Meant to paste this one:

      Yair, it's not real hard to see where the likes of 'Biff'em' Bagaric and 'Killer' Creighton take their morals and beliefs from. Same place as Xi, I suspect.

      Now the question is, would applying those traditional methods allow us to determine if either, or neither, of Pell and Becciu are telling the truth ? If so, it would be a most condign use of the technique, yes ?

      Delete
    3. I am not deeeeeply versed in the methods of inquisition, GB - I am guessing that an Inquisitor would be authorised to work over Giovanni Angelo Becciu, Pell and - whoever else had a soul crying out for intervention. A cry that only the Inquisitor is able to hear, but he (never a 'she') is duty-bound to respond to.

      Oh - nice use of 'condign'; gave me a laugh.

      Delete
  5. Not a lot to say about the Savvy Sav today - nobody really thought that Scotty'n'Josh would actually produce something coherent that would in any tangible sense support women instead of acting as though if they don't have a hubby to support them, then the Coalition certainly isn't going to.

    The thing is that there are large parts of human society that are just totally invisible to ScottyfromHorizon and JoshoftheTanakh, non upper-class women being a major one.

    So on to Cam Stew. And what can one say ? He doesn't seem like a dedicated bromancer, and certainly not of Trumpskin. "Trump on track to lose by a landslide", he says. Now can anybody think of any other reptile that would ever, could ever, say that about the Donald ? Maybe the Bolter could if Trump ever said anything that Bolt really, truly didn't like, but he's never going to do that, is he.

    So, Stew. reckons that: "...unless Trump can engineer a stunning comeback in just a few weeks, he is on track not just to lose this election, but to lose in a landslide." Wau. And the Reps and Senate with it ?

    But keep in mind that Moscow Mitch doesn't care a rat's fart's worth about that: he's managed to pack the courts with wingnut r-souls and it's probably just about time for him to retire and live the good life on his wife's $millions.

    ReplyDelete

Comments older than two days are moderated and there will be a delay in publishing them.