The pond is an extremely slow learner.
Each day the pond scans the reptile headlines for a mention of the current vast conspiracy ...
Nope, nothing, nihil, nada, zip ...
The pond slowly, all too slowly, realised that the reptiles at the lizard Oz were part of a vast international conspiracy to conceal a vast conspiracy ...
No chance for the pond to segue andto enjoy the sort of musing provided by Jonathan Chait in The Atlantic in Why Trump Can’t Make the Epstein Story Go Away, His brainwashing powers are finite. (that's an archive link)
Over the past decade, Trump’s hold on his fan base has been a mysterious and unchanging fact of American political life, the inspiration for innumerable journalistic diner safaris and the source of agonized self-reflection on the left. Trump understands that his most committed fans will believe almost anything he tells them. Any discomfiting fact is instantly dismissed as a lie coming from the “Radical Left” (Democrats), the “FAKE NEWS” (non-Republican-aligned media), the “Deep State” (any government statistic or official finding), or “RINOs” (whenever a Republican has the temerity to question him).
Crucial to this cultlike epistemology is that Trump himself defines what is true, and can alter the nature of that reality at his whim. A journalist or politician may go from Well Respected to Failing Loser and back again as many times as needed. Extravagant promises (to give everybody “terrific” health care, to end the Russia-Ukraine war in a day, to bring down grocery prices) could be issued and then memory-holed.
And so on and too delicious ...
“Why are we giving publicity to Files written by Obama, Crooked Hillary, Comey, Brennan, and the Losers and Criminals of the Biden Administration, who conned the World with the Russia, Russia, Russia Hoax, 51 ‘Intelligence’ Agents, ‘THE LAPTOP FROM HELL,’ and more?” he wrote. “They created the Epstein Files, just like they created the FAKE Hillary Clinton/Christopher Steele Dossier that they used on me, and now my so-called ‘friends’ are playing right into their hands. Why didn’t these Radical Left Lunatics release the Epstein Files?”
Not only did this new line blatantly contradict the repeated promises to release the files that Trump’s allies had made, but it was not even internally consistent. Barack Obama had concocted the Epstein files to smear Trump … but Democrats had refused to make them public, for some reason? And because the “Radical Left Lunatics” had kept them secret, Trump needed to do the same thing?
But whatever. Trump’s lies often lack even the veneer of plausibility. His devotees have generally not made him work very hard to maintain their trust. You could almost picture Trump lazily mouthing the same tropes—“fake news,” “Russia, Russia, Russia”—expecting the same result.
Except this time, Trump pushed the buttons, and nothing happened. Trump fans just grew angrier; how could Trump pretend that a pledge to uncover a sinister cabal had never mattered at all?
Exceptionally delicious ... much like Chris Stirewalt in The Hill exploring this third rail in Trump offers MAGA a third option on Epstein .
This looks like Trump employing the “widening gyre.” In a rhetorical corner but unable to simply shrug it off, Trump raises the stakes. It’s not that they’re covering up the Epstein files, you see, it’s much, much bigger. It also has the benefit of making clear that anyone pushing for the release of the files is working for the bad guys, not against them.
Please allow the pond one more delicious treat ... Arwa Mahdawi in The Graudian featuring one of the deep state's co-conspirators, Does Kash Patel deserve to run the FBI? Of course he does – and I’ll take a lie detector test to prove it
Mahdawi had the pond from the get go ...
Not so long ago, publishing deeply weird books about the president while also promoting wild QAnon conspiracy theories would get you put on some kind of watchlist. Now it gets you a top job as the guy in charge of watchlists. Patel is not just a children’s book author; he is also the director of the FBI. His chief qualification for the role appears to be his extreme devotion to President Donald Trump. He certainly didn’t have any FBI experience before getting the job as head of the agency.
And so on, and it leads to a great punchline, and oh pretty please, one last pleasure ...Trump Makes Bonkers New Threat Against AOC and Jasmine Crockett (*archive link)
Take the test, take the test ...
Please sir, the pond would like another.
Poor old Marge... Marjorie Taylor Greene Mocked for Blatant Epstein Hypocrisy (*archive link)
On the upside, the reptiles seem to have finally gotten over their China obsession for the moment with this the lead news story, a genuine EXCLUSIVE ...
Myffed: ABC accused of ‘covering up’ star’s leading role in fiery feud
A feud over Myf Warhurst’s fence erupted amid explosive allegations the ABC ran a ‘one-sided’ journalistic ‘hit job’ on her neighbour – without revealing the starring role their longstanding presenter played. WATCH the videos from both sides.
By Steve Jackson
Stunning work Steve, but the pond deeply regrets that an argument over a fence isn't sufficient a disguise for a hive mind conspiracy to cover up, ignore or excuse a deep state conspiracy.
Steve's astonishing EXCLUSIVE pushed Gough and Albo and the great wall and all that jazz well down the list.
Meanwhile, it seems that the China hysteria continues to flourish over on the extreme far right of the lizard Oz ...
Say what, this is the best petulant Peta can offer?
Like Gough Whitlam, the PM is more emotionally connected to China’s liberation struggle and quest for developmental justice than he is to the US as a bastion of market capitalism and the world’s policeman.
By Peta Credlin
Hang on, hang on, after WWII, the Swiss came out filthy rich, even more rich than they'd been before the war, and all they had to endure was a quote ...
In The Third Man, Orson Welles’ character Harry Lime says, “In Italy for thirty years under the Borgias, they had warfare, terror, murder, and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and the Renaissance. In Switzerland, they had brotherly love, they had five hundred years of democracy and peace, and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock.” Graham Greene, who co-wrote the script with director Carol Reed, said that it was “the best line of the film”—and that Welles wrote it. Welles recalled, “When the picture came out, the Swiss very nicely pointed out to me that they’ve never made any cuckoo clocks—they all come from the Schwarzwald in Bavaria!”
If we end up with a nice line in very private banking, very succulent chocolates and cuckoo clocks, perhaps adapted to a magpie theme, who but a petulant Peta would complain?
Tamworth's pride and joy ...
Jack was also still in the maw, the grip of the much feared Orient ...
Human rights, Uighurs, Tank Man, AUKUS, China’s nuclear subs, the South China Sea, destroyers in the Tasman, Taiwan … all are on the list the PM can’t talk about on tour. Then there’s the person he can’t seem to talk to …
By Jack the Insider
They probably didn't discuss the ongoing death in custody of Aboriginal people as well ...
Never mind, here, have an infallible Pope likely to ensure he and the pond are banned yet again in China ...
But hang on, hang on, some keen-eyed punters will have noticed a single attempt over on the extreme far right to deal with the vast international conspiracy involving a certain Epstein ... by bringing in a certain legal eagle, the dissing Dershowitz ...
The header: The inside scoop on Jeffrey Epstein,I was his lawyer. I know things that court orders won’t allow me to disclose.
The caption: British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell and US financier Jeffrey Epstein.
So the reptiles tried to quash the whole files saga by turning to a punter who literally had skin in the game, albeit allegedly hidden by alleged underwear ...
(YouTube link for that news story)
Amazingly it was just a humble two minute exercise in apologetics, but do go on ...
Epstein never created a “client list”. The FBI interviewed alleged victims who named several “clients”. These names have been redacted. They should be disclosed, but the courts have ordered them sealed. I know who they are. They don’t include any current officeholders.
We don’t know whether the accusations are true. The courts also have sealed negative information about some of the accusers to protect them.
Neither the Justice Department nor private defence lawyers are free to disregard court sealing orders. The media can and should petition the courts for the release of all names and information so the public can draw its own conclusions.
The reptiles flung in a snap as a distraction, Donald Trump watches as Tucker Carlson delivers remarks during a Turning Point Action campaign rally.
Meanwhile ...
Open records show an acquaintance between Epstein and Donald Trump many years ago. That relationship ended when Trump reportedly banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago, long before becoming President.
I have seen nothing that would suggest anything improper or even questionable by Trump.
It is clear from the evidence that Epstein committed suicide. What isn’t clear is whether he was assisted by jail personnel. That seems likely to me, based on the evidence of allegedly broken cameras, transfer of his cellmate and the absence of guards during relevant time periods.
I have absolutely no doubt that Epstein never worked for any intelligence agency. If he had he would surely have told me and his other lawyers, who would have used that information to get him a better deal. (He wasn’t satisfied with the so-called sweetheart deal he got, which required him to spend 1½ years in a local jail and register as a sex offender.)
The reptiles tried another visual feint and distraction ... Robert Maxwell
But look at the company he keeps if the illustration for a 2019 New Yorker profile (*archive link) is anything to go by ...
What a sordid and sorry set of tales there is in that profile, but the pond must press on ...
Conspiracy stories attract readers, viewers and listeners. They are also fodder for political attacks.
The Epstein case has generated more than its share of such theories, and there is nothing more annoying to gossipmongers than when stubborn facts (or the absence of facts) get in the way of a juicy theory.
Sorry to disappoint you, but there is really nothing much to see here, beyond what has already been disclosed.
Alan Dershowitz is a professor emeritus at Harvard Law School and author of The Preventive State: The Challenge of Preventing Serious Harms While Preserving Essential Liberties. This article was first published in The Wall Street Journal.
Well, he would say that wouldn't he.
Nothing to see here, nothing at all ...
By golly, that final link to New York magazine is a tidy one, with a tidy tale to tell, albeit deeply sordid, dark and enormously corrupt and corrupting.
See Philip Weiss, The Fantasist, on 7th December 2007 (*archive link)
Not sorted reptiles, not hidden in a broom closet just yet ...
Let the many conspiracies continue to flourish, let the killings on Fifth Avenue commence ...
And so to a minor matter for the bonus, the ongoing need to gas Australia to save the planet because nuking it, and giving the pond an SMR for its backyard, and all that jazz, seems to have fallen by the wayside ...
The header: Gas deadlock won’t break without a policy short circuit, Australia’s energy transition to net zero will include a critical, albeit diminishing, role for gas. The government’s immediate challenge is to make that role clear and compelling.
The caption for the snap of the sort of kit the reptiles just love: A worker walks through the Queensland Curtis Liquefied Natural Gas project site.
The mystical command: This article contains features which are only available in the web version, Take me there
Gas away ...
This should be a no-brainer yet, sadly, there is little agreement on how this objective should be achieved. Natural gas has been a major energy source for Australian homes and businesses since the 1960s. For most of that time the east coast domestic gas market has been internally focused, with demand and supply in balance.
Two developments upset this balance. In 2015, liquefied natural gas exports began from Gladstone, Queensland. By 2024, export volumes of more than 1400 petajoules were 75 per cent of total east coast demand. Concern arose that the LNG terminals would suck the market dry.
The Turnbull government introduced the Australian Domestic Gas Security Mechanism to avoid this. Its threat of direct intervention in the export contracts was enough to ensure that demand has been met since then.
In 2022, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine lifted global demand for non-Russian gas, driving up the price, including for Australian exports. Wholesale gas prices on the east coast soared from $10 a gigajoule to $30. The Albanese government had to act.
It imposed a $12 price cap and established a heads of agreement with the exporters. Central to the agreement is that the domestic market gas will be supplied at prices no greater than what international customers pay. The government also introduced a Gas Market Code that imposes $12 a gigajoule as a “reasonable price” for wholesale contracts.
The central and critical focus of the current review will be on these three instruments with the simple objective to ensure Australian consumers have sufficient supplies at a reasonable price while supporting Australia’s position as a reliable trading partner.
Naturally whenever climate change and such like religious cults are involved, it's important to turn to real experts ...
Come on down Canavan caravan, let the reptiles go for a ride, Nationals Senator Matt Canavan joined Sky News Australia to discuss the Chamber of Commerce pitch, raising concerns over Labor's out-of-reach target. “Rather than focus on the target ahead of them in 2030, which they are not going to meet, they’re now going to set an even greater and bigger target that they are not going to be around for in 2035 or 40,” Mr Canavan said “I hope the Australian people are seeing through this because this net zero obsession is the principal reason why productivity is in the slumps, it’s clearly the reason why electricity prices have risen 31 per cent since we signed up to net zero and gas prices have risen 39 per cent, that’s on top of an already major increases over the past couple of decades as we obsessed about this green energy scam. “The Australian people, they’ve had enough of paying high bills, high electricity bills, it’s flowing through to food prices now, the cost of everything is going up, why don’t we focus on using our energy resources again why don’t we focus on a target of reducing the cost of living in Australia before we focus on a target of reducing astray emissions which are barely anything of global emissions in any case.”
On with gassing the country ...
The review’s consultation paper seeks proposals on options for change. Considering previous attempts and mixed results on both the west and east coasts, there are two conceptual alternatives worth considering.
Some form of policy to reserve gas for Australians is an attractive idea and recent statements by the Prime Minister were interpreted as him supporting the idea. Since 2006, Western Australia has had a reservation policy that mandates LNG producers reserve 15 per cent of their LNG exports for the state’s domestic market. The reserved volume has been enough to keep prices low. The policy was highly contentious at the outset but suppliers and consumers generally learned to work with it, although recent price increases suggest tensions are re-emerging.
Reservation brings two problems. First, determining a target volume seems arbitrary and static in a rapidly changing market. While the consultation paper says national gas demand is expected to remain steady across the next 20 years, that is debatable.
And so to another interrupting snap with strange advice, NETWORK SPECIAL. NO AUS, NO NEWS.COM , PLEASE CONTACT NETWORK PICTURE DESK BEFORE PUBLISHING. , Chris Bowen, Minister for Climate Change and Energy of Australia speaks first time since the election.Australian Energy Week held at Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre. Picture: Jason Edwards
Please don't expect the pond to decipher that all caps code, the pond merely reports and correspondents decide.
If the reptiles want to date John Curtin as being alive and well with Sir Tom at Adelaide's central railway station in 1948, despite clearly erroneous reports that he died in July 1945, it's not for the pond to explain or reconcile.
The pond merely transcribes for the amusement of correspondents...
And so to a final gassing, strictly for the pleasure of fucking the planet ...
A different approach would be to retain but streamline the current instruments into a single framework. After all, they have demonstrably worked on supply security for the past eight years.
Instead of an imposed reasonable price, with exemptions that render it almost irrelevant, a better approach would be to impose a wholesale price obligation based on export parity. Governance could be tightened by giving the regulatory monitoring role to the Australian Energy Regulator, with powers of contract price discovery and penalties for breaches.
The debate will be heated. Gas consumers would prefer a closed domestic market. Gas producers would prefer no export controls.
But a combination such as the above could provide the clear and predictable market arrangements under which both could make their long-term investments with confidence. The Coalition’s intervention idea put to the election in May even suggests potential for bipartisan support.
A sharp review should be followed by broader strategic considerations that will flow from climate change targets and related policies. Australia’s energy transition to net zero will include a critical, albeit diminishing, role for gas. The government’s immediate challenge is to make that role clear and compelling.
Tony Wood is energy and climate change senior fellow at the Grattan Institute.
And in the spirit of the Canavan caravan, the pond concludes with a consoling thought, thanks to Wilcox...
I wonder which side of the fence Tony Woods is on. No menrion of RETURNS on PRICE. Or did the newsai bot kooolaid affected sub ed cut the offending "we woz robbed" paragraph?
ReplyDelete"Instead of an imposed reasonable price, with exemptions that render it almost irrelevant, a better approach would be to impose a wholesale price obligation based on export parity. Governance could be tightened by giving the regulatory monitoring role to the Australian Energy Regulator, with powers of contract price discovery and penalties for breaches.
The debate will be heated"...
"Australia missing out on $13 billion in royalty revenue from gas projects, report says"
By Clint Jasper
Topic:Oil and Gas
Thu 30 May 2024
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-05-30/gas-royalties-missing/103907264
See John Quiggin back in July 2018...
Deletehttps://johnquiggin.com/2018/07/12/grattan-goes-denialist/
Grattan goes denialist
Reading the reactions to the incoherent report on electricity pricing from the ACCC, I was struck by this quote from Tony Wood of the Grattan Institute, writing in the Oz
"Australians need energy policy that is driven by neither green evangelism for renewables nor a deep-seated fear to protect the role of coal for baseload power."
“Green evangelism” is rhetoric straight out of the denialist camp, associated with the bogus claim that climate change is not science but a religion. The content of the piece bears this out. Wood opposes any form of subsidy for renewables and (by omission) any price on carbon emissions. He advocates a policy that is “the policy is indifferent to the technology mix, whether new-build or the extension of the operating life of an existing, newer coal-fired plant.”
This is centrism at its worst. Faced with a choice between an evidence-based response to climate change and culture-war proposals to actively subsidise the destruction of the global environment, Grattan has gone for the “middle course” of doing nothing whatsoever about climate change.
There was a link to Ted Cruz talking about the climate religion, and to the piece in the Oz, which started out this way ...
Argument for subsidies has no power in economic merit based world
Proven technologies face challenges the national energy guarantee can fix.
Australians need energy policy that is driven by neither green evangelism for renewables nor a deep-seated fear to protect the role of coal for baseload power.
The Turnbull government’s national energy guarantee may be that policy. Reflecting the ideological nature of Australian energy policy, many are criticising the NEG as the destroyer of investment, jobs and lower prices that come from renewable energy.
Meanwhile, many others say the NEG, if supported at all, must be complemented by direct government funding for new coal-fired generation to deliver lower prices and acceptable reliability.
Give your favourite economic modeller the right assumptions and they almost certainly can validate your preferred view. But a dispassionate review of the key economic factors can be revealing.
Since 2009, grid-based electricity demand across the National Electricity Market has been flat or falling, except for the 2014-15 period when the liquefied natural gas export facilities in Queensland were starting up. The trend looks likely to continue. As a result, there will be new investment only if existing plants close because of age or poor profitability, or subsidies force in new supply.
Barring a significant technology breakthrough or disaster, this investment will be coal, gas, solar or wind. All four are proven technologies. But all face challenges.
There was a whole lot of verbiage, including the conclusion:
Within the dual constraints, the policy is indifferent to the technology mix, whether new-build or the extension of the operating life of an existing, newer coal-fired plant. The NEG, if its present design is broadly implemented, will provide a credible and sustainable platform for investment. The case for renewables or new coal, whatever the costs look like today, then will rest on the economic merits. In that world, there is no case for subsidies for new coal or for subsidy extensions for renewables.
As yesterday’s report from the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission clearly demonstrates, markets need to be well-regulated or consumers will suffer. Resetting the electricity market for today’s circumstances is a job for governments and regulators. Unpredictable intervention is not.
Forget the climate religion, just go cheep, cheep ...
Thanks DP for The Quigginator.
DeleteThe fence sitters, apologists and rhe corpse corp all elide a carbon price and opportunity costs.
Another Henry said yesterday... and Tony Wood seems to be doing "“a wilful act of intergenerational bastardry”.
"On Wednesday, Henry condemned previous failed attempts to reform the laws. He described delays in improving environmental management as “a wilful act of intergenerational bastardry”.
https://theconversation.com/ken-henry-urges-nature-law-reform-after-decades-of-intergenerational-bastardry-261167
"Opportunity costs: can carbon taxing become a positive-sum game?"
by John Quiggin
...Decades ago, economists developed solutions – or variants on the same solution – to the problem of pollution, the key being the imposition of a price on the generation of pollutants such as carbon dioxide (CO2). The idea was to make visible, and accountable, the true environmental costs of any production process.
"Carbon pricing could stabilise the global climate, and cap unwanted warming, at a fraction of the cost that we are likely to end up paying in other ways. And as emissions were rapidly reduced, we could save enough to compensate most of the ‘losers’, such as displaced coal miners; a positive-sum solution. Yet, carbon pricing has been mostly spurned in favour of regulatory solutions that are significantly more costly. Why?
"Environmental pollution is one of the most pervasive and intractable failures of market systems (and Soviet-style central planning). Almost every kind of economic activity produces harmful byproducts, which are costly to dispose of safely. The cheapest thing to do is to dump the wastes into waterways or the atmosphere. Under pure free-market conditions, that’s precisely what happens. Polluters pay nothing for dumping waste while society bears the cost.
"Since most energy in modern societies comes from burning carbon-based fuels, solving this problem, whether through new technology or altered consumption patterns, will require changes in a vast range of economic activities. If these changes are to be achieved without reducing standards of living, or obstructing the efforts of less developed countries to lift themselves out of poverty, it is important to find a path to emissions reduction that minimises costs.
"But since pollution costs aren’t properly represented in market prices, there’s little use in looking at the accounting costs that appear in corporate balance sheets, or the market-based costs that go into national accounting measures such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP). For economists, the right way to think is in terms of ‘opportunity cost’, which can be defined as follows: The opportunity cost of anything of value is what you must give up so that you can have it. So how should we think about the opportunity cost of CO2 emissions?
...
https://aeon.co/ideas/opportunity-costs-can-carbon-taxing-become-a-positive-sum-game
But what will the deniers and arm chair generals say about the other place?
Delete" "Photos: The Scale of China’s Solar-Power Projects
"As the Trump administration’s “Big, Beautiful Bill” eliminates many clean-energy incentives in the U.S., China continues huge investments in wind and solar power, reportedly accounting for 74 percent of all projects now under construction worldwide."
By Alan Taylor
JULY 10, 2025
...
https://www.theatlantic.com/photography/archive/2025/07/photos-china-solar-power-energy/683488/
Might be OT, but Mungo!
ReplyDeleteAdvance! By staying in place!
Date and context irrelevant broken record...
"MATT CANAVAN MAKES A FOOL OF CLUELESS, ANTI-COAL CSIRO
...
"Well done, Senator.
"Maybe if we had a few more pollies like you, Australia would also be investing in infrastructure to expand our largest export markets like our strategic competitor Russia.
"Unfortunately for now it seems we’re stuck with deindustrialisation, importing “renewables” from China, and putting our eggs in unproven, early-stage technologies being pushed by egotistical green billionaires and incompetent bureaucrats whose lives are paid for by the taxpayer."
https://www.advanceaustralia.org.au/matt_canavan_makes_a_fool_of_clueless_anti_coal_csiro
2018...
"Australia – where?
by Mungo MacCallum
Published on November 26, 2018
...
"The latest wizard wheeze come from a stratospherically elite clique of rich, bored men looking for a hobby. It includes men like Maurice Newman, who preaches that climate science is a fraudulent conspiracy ensuring the establishment of a totalitarian socialist dictatorship under the United Nations, and James Power, currently fighting to prevent women from becoming members of Brisbane’s Tattersall’s Club.
"After diligent market research, they have settled on the unoriginal name of Advance Australia, which is not only plagiarism but deeply misleading – the only way they want Australia to advance is either jogging on the spot, or, preferably, stumbling backwards.
"They claim to be protecting mainstream Australian values, but just about the only ones they have come up with thus far are maintaining superannuation tax lurks for the rich, keeping tax deductions for those who have not paid tax in the first place, and not moving Australia Day from January 26. To date, mainstream Australia has resisted the urge to storm the barricades on their behalf.
"The organisation’s oligarchs are predicting that they will have a million members in time for the federal election,"...
...
https://www.themonthly.com.au/blog/advance-australia-where#mtr
Today...
"Right-wing political group Advance is in the headlines. What is it and what does it stand for?
Published: July 16, 2025
"Political lobby group Advance has been back in the headlines this week. It was revealed an organisation headed by the husband of the Special Envoy for Combatting Antisemitism, Jillian Segal, donated A$50,000 to the group.
"The news prompted outcry, though Segal denied any personal involvement.
"So what is Advance and what does it do?
"What is Advance?
"Advance (originally Advance Australia) is a digital campaigning organisation. It was formed in 2018 by a group of wealthy Australians, many with connections to the Liberal Party. The idea was to be a conservative counterpoint to progressive digital campaigning group GetUp!
"At the time, political journalist Mungo McCallum described them asa “stratospherically elite clique of rich, bored men looking for a hobby.” He suggested they would have little, if any, impact.
"Today the group has more than 330,000 members.
...
https://theconversation.com/right-wing-political-group-advance-is-in-the-headlines-what-is-it-and-what-does-it-stand-for-261164