Did Polonius's prattle trigger the bot?

 

There was a ripple in the force on the weekend when the pond's Sunday meditation was unceremoniously shoved behind a demand for age verification.

At first the pond didn't realise what was going down, and resisted a proposal to recycle all three reptile contributions.

But then the pond - made oblivious by its own auto sign-in - realised what was happening and just had to know.

What did trigger the bot? 

The pond has its suspicions, and so over three days will attempt in late arvo 4.30 pm posts to feature all three of the reptiles, and then the sundry distractions which the pond flung into the mix.

The pond suspects that it was the tendency of the pond to go off the rails, do a Tootle and offer the distractions that caused the fuss, but perhaps there were other reasons.

First up the pond should propose that all examples of the reptile hive mind should be kept away from children, unless accompanied by a warning, "there but for the grace of the long absent lord go thee ..."

Secondly none of the reptile contributions were in any way remotely interesting ... in fact they were a form of eye-glazing terminal ennu.

But the pond's gottsa ta kno...

Perhaps it was Polonius, prattling away behind the arras ... 

Perhaps it was the subject matter he chose ...

It can't have been the pond's header, In which the pond celebrates the furry Polonius, because the bot allowed the "furry" header to saunter into the world.

...so here he is again, in exactly the same form ...

Reading the venerable Meade's Weekly Beast last Friday, the pond felt a surge of despair at the news from Gaza (or the famine-induced inability to produce it), and curiously also a surge of pride...

The old dog himself. 

The old dog still barking away and howling at the ABC moon. 

The man who fancies himself a dog. 

The man who gave furries a respectable home in the lizard Oz hive mind.

It was a tad cruel for the venerable Meade to label him tedious, but someone hold the venerable Meade's beer because today is ennui central ...

The header: Why wasn’t childcare abuse a focus of the royal commission?, The matter of child safety while in institutional childcare should have been leading the news bulletins and on the front pages at least a decade ago.

The caption for the banal, borrowed stock snap: The royal commission did not do a case study into childcare institutions, although it did mention child safety in its reports. Picture: istock

The mindless, moronic layout mantra: This article contains features which are only available in the web version, Take me there

A word of warning. For many years Polonius has carried a chip on his shoulder at the way that the Catholic church and its priests have been persecuted for the harmless fun of indulging in a little child molesting.

It will take time for Polonius to get there, but don't be lulled into a false sense of security for his relatively benign opening mention of the ABC:

It’s an unusual phenomenon when a senior politician acknowledges that they could have done better. But such an instance occurred on July 3 when federal Education Minister Jason Clare was interviewed by ABC TV 7.30 presenter Sarah Ferguson. At issue was the topic of safety in childcare and early education.
The interview took place in the aftermath of a man being charged with serious child sex offences while working at a childcare centre in Melbourne.
Ferguson commented on a report that said “if you look across all data, at least one report a day of sexual misconduct comes from childcare centres”.
In response to a question as to what he had been doing for the past three years, Clare replied: “The bottom line is that ministers haven’t been doing enough, fast enough.” Asked whether that included him, Clare responded: “Including me.”

Cue a snap, Federal Education Minister Jason Clare. Picture: NewsWire/Martin Ollman

It goes without saying that Polonius is infallibly, unremittingly, astonishingly fair ...

To be fair to Clare, he is supposed to be advised by public servants concerning such matters and should not be expected to take responsibility for acts of commission or omission in childcare centres. Moreover, he is the federal minister in an area where the states and territories have specific responsibilities.
But there is a bigger issue, which is unfashionable to raise. Namely, the matter of child safety while in institutional childcare should have been leading the news bulletins and on the front pages at least a decade ago.
On November 12, 2012, prime minister Julia Gillard – with the support of opposition leader Tony Abbott and in co-operation with the states and territories – set up the Royal Commission Into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. It was headed by Justice Peter McClellan KC, who was assisted by five other commissioners. The royal commission had a maximum budget of $372.8m, of which $342m was spent. It employed about 300 staff at any one time. McClellan presented his final report to the governor-general on December 15, 2017.
All up, the royal commission produced 17 reports, conducted 57 case studies and made 409 recommendations. And what did McClellan and his fellow commissioners have to say about childcare and early education?

To be fair, was it in their brief? As the pond recalls it, the terms of reference were constructed and construed in a way that responded to the news of the day, Prime Minister Julia Gillard, left, outlines the details of the royal commission in 2013. Picture: AAP

Eek, the cat lady, and to be fair - the pond is trying to be very fair this day, and not just very trying -there's no point trying to retrofit the current deplorable events into what was then making news as a decades long deplorable event.

Besides, Polonius disses it as completely useless, because there's nothing more compelling - in the sense of head drooping on shoulders - than a Polonial read ...

Well, not much at all. It is doubtful if its lengthy reports were read by many, even though they contained considerable valuable information. Such work, primarily drafted by public servants, does not compelling reading make.

And he doth make compelling reading?

Methinks, the pond not ...

And so to the perennial Polonila whine about the unfair treatment of the churches, particularly the Catholic variety, for their harmless indulgence in a little child molestation over decades..
McClellan became a public figure, along with counsel assisting Gail Furness SC, because of the royal commission’s case studies, which involved hearings. They were open to the media and filmed, and transcripts (with detailed indexes) were available online the day after each proceeding.
At Gillard’s media conference, the first question turned on whether the royal commission “would look beyond the Catholic Church to all institutions”. She replied, “absolutely correct”. However, she told journalists she had phoned Cardinal George Pell as a courtesy before the announcement. No other leader, religious or otherwise, was mentioned.
It soon became apparent that the focus of the royal commission was the Catholic Church and, to a lesser extent, the Anglican Church. Indeed, Pell spent about 36 hours giving evidence. The second longest evidence given was by an Anglican archbishop.
The problem here was that, to many Australians, the royal commission appeared to be focused on the Christian churches, particularly the Catholic Church.
Writing in these pages on August 19, 2017, Greg Craven (a former crown counsel to the Victorian government) commented that “the obsession of the royal commission with ‘the Catholics’ has all but crowded out the scrutiny of other institutions”. He added: “I have some insight into historic child abuse within Australian public institutions. State governments collectively are breathing a sigh of relief the commission’s focus on church abuse largely has let them off the hook.”
And so it came to pass. Of the royal commission’s 57 case studies, more than a quarter were into Catholic institutions and many of the rest into other Christian institutions. There was not one case study into an existing government school. When I wrote this in my column previously, McClellan replied that it was “not correct” to say the royal commission had failed to have a public hearing into a state school.

Regular readers of Polonius will be familiar with this sense of unfair and unjust persecution, and his many attempts to make sure interest in the crime should be directed anywhere else, Justice Peter McClellan addresses the public hearing of the royal commission in 2017. Picture: Jeremy Piper

This was just more of the same misdirection ...

He said “the royal commission did examine three NSW public schools in a case study”. What McClellan did not point out was that this was a very brief report into sexual abuse in government schools by students against other students. This did not involve pedophilia. I wrote to McClellan, by post and email, about this. He did not respond.
The end of the royal commission led to many complaints from those who had attended government schools. Commissions of inquiry have been held into his­torical child sexual abuse by adults in Tasmania and Victoria. The latter inquiry is yet to be finalised.
Recently in NSW, a former teacher at Vaucluse Primary, a government school in Sydney, was convicted of historical child sexual abuse. The NSW government had yet to set up an inquiry into pedophilia within its Department of Education schools, despite the evidence of considerable offending having taken place.
I have been advised that a parent of a (then) child who was educated at Vaucluse Primary approached the royal commission but it declined to take up his matter. I have written elsewhere about a teacher who approached the royal commission about a pedophile teacher at a government school in Melbourne. No action was taken. Both cases involved teachers who had previously been accused or convicted of child sexual abuse and whose cases were reported in the media. But the royal commission didn’t notice. Yet most Australian students attend government schools.
As far as I can determine, the royal commission did not do a case study into childcare institutions, although it did mention child safety in its reports. If historical child sexual abuse in childcare institutions had become a public issue around the time the royal commission was established, Australians would not have been so shocked by the recent appalling accounts. And Clare would have no genuine excuse for failing to focus on these crimes.

Sorry, no and then. Xian institutions were into kiddy f*ddl*ng. (*)

Any criminality uncovered now should be dealt with, but it shouldn't detract from the culpability of those rancid Xian institutions. And no amount of Polonial distraction or screaming "wadda bout guvmint schools" can hide that tragedy...

And then the pond blanched. There was "Ned" lying in ambush ...

And so, assuming this actually landed without bot interference, on to "Ned" tomorrow at 4.30 pm, with Snappy Tom on the Wednesday, and the pond's attempts at distraction on the Thursday.

Stay tuned for the unfolding bot mystery ...well, given that outing with Polonius, the pond could hardly tease an exciting time with aged reptile fodder ...

(* the pond amended this word because it didn't want Polonius to get hung by the bot for the pond's own verbal excesses).