Saturday, February 01, 2020

In which it's back to business, with nattering "Ned" and the dog botherer ready to wage war on nature, and whatever else you've got ...


The pond usually holds the immortal Rowe back, down the bottom, but he's always to be found here, and today being 1st February, the January holyday season is officially over, and the reptiles are rampant once again …

Only the bromancer is missing from the first eleven for the moment, but no matter, because nattering "Ned" has returned to bore completely shitless everyone and anyone innocently passing by, and is there any better way to introduce "Ned" than to lead with a gaseous Rowe? 

The arch bloviator and mind-numbing bore started quietly at the top of the digital page …

 

But the pond knew at once, after it was immediately tempted to click, that it had hit the jackpot, the mother lode of tedium, when the reptiles blessed this "Ned" natter with a hugely, bigly Lobbecke ...


He's holding the world in his hands and he's using a garden hose, and long forgotten is the thing he once held in his hand with trembling awe and delight in the font of Australian democracy …


Alas and alack, those days are gone, and now it's fossil gas that must set the pace, and if there's a better form of fossilised gas than nattering "Ned", the pond and the reptiles can't imagine it ...


The pond must apologise. There is too much "Ned" to comment on, though the pond does appreciate the comments below the fold by those heroic souls who wade through the tedious political calculations to pick out a nugget of reptile stupidity …

And the pond's cartoons are in short supply, rather like a cool day and rain in the current plague of bushfires …


Well yes, and there's more Wilcox here, but the prolix tedious bore down from the attic has only just got started … 

Why, the pond has had to revert to small print gobbets just to contain things a little ...

Mmm, rhetorical questions. The pond can play that game. Does anyone believe that the climate science denialist reptiles have really changed their spots? Does anyone ever tire of the 1.3% mantra, while at the same time, refusing to count in the emissions to be derived from the export of coal and gas around the world?

Well there's a lot of tedious fact checking going down at Crikey, reprinting an ABC/RMIT fact check here, but suffice to say, however you calculate it, we do much better than 1.3% if you include exports …

But just as the reptiles have floated 1.3% a zillion times, the pond has added the corollary and yet there's never been any thought of a change, because once you've recited the mass once, you might as well keep on with the Angus Dei for all eternity …

Why would the reptiles bother to change, and consider such issues in a meaningful way? A token gradualism, spiced with saucy doubts and fears, is all that's needed.

After all, we've gone from outright climate science denialism to grudging acceptance that the weather is changing, as the weather has always done, and all that's needed is a few practical solutions, like burning down the entire country in order to save it, as once was done for Vietnamese villages, and all will be well ...


Yes, it's the fault of everybody else. We know that, we know it's nothing to do with Australia, and there's certainly no leadership role down under. Let California suffer its fires, but don't expect SloMo to do anything more than murmur a few thoughts and prayers.

Of course those reptile chants celebrating clean dinkum Oz coal might seem a tad unfortunate in retrospect, but how were the reptiles to know? It's not like they ever actually listened to any climate science, which it turns out, only became available in the last six months, and so we must turn to non-existent technology for a solution, because … well, because delay, befuddle and bewilder still remain the most useful tactics for when the reptiles must cry out for beloved coal … (and gas) …

And so to the biggest joke of all, the notion that Scotty from marketing must purge the anti-renewable mob in his midst … as if the reptiles would suddenly turn around and purge all the denialists and anti-renewable loons in their midst ...


Ah, so that's how the game is played. It's wrong to call Scotty from marketing a denier, even though he has been, because all that does is stop him from developing a different form of fossil fuel as the solution …

Truth to tell, whenever the pond reads "Ned" its brain begins to hurt and it's soon reduced to a sullen numbness, but at least that allows the pond to keep pounding its noggin with a piece of "Ned"-approved 2 be 4 …or a gaseous 5 if you will ...


Now there's a comforting thought. If there are fewer fires next summer, all will be well …


Oh dear, the pond is running short on Wilcox, but at least that gets us to the last, mercifully short gobbet of Ned ...


And now because the pond is a glutton for punishment, and was astonished a reader had never donned the cilice, which the pond suggests is essential clobber for the Catholic Boys'Daily, and must be worn during any reading of the reptiles, there's surely room for just more more after-dinner mint, and what a banquet there was to choose from at the top of the commentary section ...


The pond could immediately overlook Bjorn.

We don't need no stinking furriners coming in here, telling us how to do climate science denialism. For too long the reptiles have relied on Bjorn, and the pond, growing tired of him, banned him long ago …

We must turn, in these nativist times, to our native experts for a burst of insanity, and by golly, Peter Jennings  delivered a good headline ...


Yes, fuck it, we're at war with nature. Let's turn on it, all guns blazing, burn it, bomb it, wreck it. Heck, if the war doesn't go that well, there's a good case for bringing out the nukes and nuking nature to teach it a lesson …

It was great stuff, an echo of "Ned's" blather about the ADF, but when all things were considered, and Ukraine was located near Bangladesh, how could the pond fail to recognise the dog botherer's invaluable ongoing contribution?

He's indefatigable, he's a little energiser bunny of denialism, and how the reptiles love this noble warrior, always ready to go to war with those lacking his intense theological faith … including nature if She gets uppity and difficult …

Strangely though, the pond noted a certain muting of the denialism, a certain softening, and a lot of blather about SloMo being on the case, as the dog botherer shifted from combative field warrior to sensible strategic deep thinker (oh, it worked so well for Iraq, that deep thinking).


Oh dear, starting off with a rant about social media? Was it only yesterday that the pond pointed out a reptile dilemma?


Please, reptiles, get up to speed. The dog botherer should have started with "social media is great, and I am in the climate science denialist bubble with the Donald, and things look mighty fine from here", rather than blathering about "sensible things" and seizing on Peter Hartcher as the problem … as if somehow Hartcher, a doofus himself, was responsible for Scotty from marketing being a remarkable doofus all on his own, utilising his own doofus skills, and infinite capacity for mis-steps and for doofus policy responses ...


Indeed, indeed, it's a total disaster that the federal government might assume any responsibility for bushfires, when as everyone knows, it's all a matter of personal responsibility …

And there's simply no point in discussing climate science, because deep down, everyone in reptile la la land knows the onion muncher was right to call it complete crap … or bullshit, or whatever …

Still, there's no denying it's a difficult time for the reptiles, what with those dreadful greenies out and about, with their terrible signs …

And meanwhile, it turns out that rorting is just a classic case of politics as usual … because rorting is what everyone does …

Fine words from the rorter at the heart of the utegate affair … (not to mention a proud minor war criminal who played his part in fucking Iraq).


Indeed, indeed, and what was that which nattering "Ned" nattered about, the way that the left-right divide hampered exciting policy initiatives?

But that's the way it goes in reptile la la land. Stupidity, inconsistency, and a routine diet of follies, while the country burns, and the planet is slowly, but ever more comprehensively, fucked …

Well the pond's brain is also now fucked, thanks to "Ned" and the dog botherer, and what a relief to arrive at the final gobbet … and what do you know, it begins with the dog botherer jerking his own and other reptile chains, wanking on about the wonders of the lizard Oz, masturbating in public, and possibly growing hairs on his palms as a result.

Stop watching Cats, the pond is tired of all this ejaculating furry nonsense about the glories and wonders of the lizard Oz and its "evidence and accurate assessments", as if cluelessness had suddenly left the 'leet Surry Hills HQ for a world class coffee from the best baristas on the planet ...


Uh huh. The dog botherer still knows how to do undiluted hagiography, though the tone has shifted from watching Cats to humping the leg of SloMo like a dog botherer on doggie heat …

Sheesh, and after all that, all the pond can offer in compensation is a cartoon which distils down the essence of the scribbling into a digestible image …


11 comments:

  1. "The pond must apologise. There is too much "Ned" to comment on ..." Spot on again, DP though there was just one Ned natter that caught my attention: "Morrison's supporters do him no good insisting there was nothing unprecedented about the fires."

    Que ? Does the Niche Natterer actually mean that the fires were, in fact, unprecedented, or is he admitting that ScottyfromMarketing will just have to lie about how "unprecedented" they actually were ?

    But there's also this: "And so to the biggest joke of all, the notion that Scotty from marketing must purge the anti-renewable mob in his midst …"

    And that's it precisely, DP, ScottyfromMarketng will have to overide the climate denialists in his government and in his party. Now where exactly have I ever heard that idea before ? Somebody called Malcolm, wasn't it ?

    There is, though, this gem from the Doggy Bov: "Surely pundits would see that voters use polls to send messages."

    Yep, Doggy Bov, of course they do. Am I the only one who actually remembers 'The Rise and Rise of Michael Rimmer' ?

    However, there is something to be said for that 1.3% thing: firstly, that only 5 'states' have a GHG percentage above 3%, namely China (27.5%), USA (14.8%), EU (9.3%), India (6.4%) and Russia (4.9%). So what Australia should do is obvious: use its "relatively small" contribution of 1.28% to develop the technology - using the CSIRO as a major creator - to actually reduce Australia's contribution to very near 0% and then take that technology to all the rest of the world except the 'big five' mentioned above.

    That would remove about 35% of current emissions, and maybe either encourage or shame the 'Big Five' into doing the same ! There'd be Jobson Grofe and economic upturn for Australia in that, wouldn't there ?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi DP. The reptiles are becoming shrillier by the day! The voices of Morrison & Co in interviews have lately taken on a higher pitch - a whingeing, desperate sort of "you've really, really, got to believe me" tone which I'm loving. Slomo's latest Press Club poorformance was pure schadenfreude territory.

    Also, a minor point, but telling nonetheless. Kenny's use of quotation marks around the words "climate election" is pure hacksterism. Does it mean he personally thinks our last federal election was solely about climate, and therefore the Coalition won the vote because of their "climate agenda"? Or is he saying that "others" are calling it a climate election?

    As usual Kenny wants it both ways - wasn't that a 70s pop song? I cannot remember the Coalition mentioning much anything re climate in their campaign - nothing worthy of calling it a climate election anyway. Did I miss something?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Kez, you missed the wingnut reptiles endlessly claiming that it was a "climate election" which was decisively lost by the evil left-Greenies headed up by Bill (that Australia can't afford) Shorten and that therefore the Australian people (especially the quiet ones) don't give a rat's fart about 'climate change'.

      That's how politics is played in a Facebook/Murdoch world. If you repeat something often enough, lots of people will have heard it and, without further ado, will believe it's true. And when a wingnut "believes" something, it's stuck in their tiny cerebrum forever.

      Just think of 'the long slow march" for instance. Every wingnut, and especially the reptile variety, believes in that with a lifetime of fixed passion.

      Delete
    2. You are right GB. I don't know what I was thinking...isn't the long slow march a bit of a Communese thingy?

      Delete
    3. Personally, I've never been all that sure what exactly a "Communese thingy" might actually be. But it was conceived by an Italian so-called Marxist named Gramsci in the 1930s, though not named as such until Dutschke in the 1960s.

      Which is long enough ago and far enough away for none of our reptiles to have any real idea what it is. That doesn't stop them including it in the wingnut catechism of Things To Endlessly Carry On About And Blame The Left For.

      Delete
  3. Hi Dorothy,

    The reptiles have been keen to avoid any unnecessary facts entering into the rather distressing reality that an ‘unprecedented’ amount of the east coast of Australia has been on fire.

    Especially they have avoided this little gem;


    http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/current/annual/aus/

    Yep. It’s been hot.

    To avoid the heat the DiddyWrote household has decamped to the cinema and would have to disagree with DP on 1917.

    The use of the one shot method gave a sense of immediacy and real motion in a portrayal of a war that was almost defined by its lack of movement. I do agree that the central part of the film was a bit flat.

    On a personal note I realised after watching it that my grandmothers brother died a week later and less than 5000 metres from where the film was supposedly set.

    Pointless.

    Still onto the other Oscar contenders.

    JoJo Rabbit was much better than I expected and quite dark for a film advertised as a comedy. Enjoyable but not worthy of a top gong.

    The Irishman was an excellent piece of cinema if you removed all the driving about and checking into hotels. Scorsese desperately needed an editor.

    Once Upon a time in Hollywood was Tarantino allowed a fantasy wank. Very poor.

    Haven’t seen Ford v Ferrari, Little Women, Marriage Story and I’m not even going near Joker.

    My favourite film up for an Oscar.

    Parasite.

    Best thing I’ve seen in an age. Forget about it being in Korean it is brilliant and wildly unexpected. Can say no more due to spoilers.

    DiddyWrote

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. DW - you've seen this then, I suppose:

      Funny, political and bone-crunchingly violent: why Korean cinema is the world's best
      https://www.theguardian.com/film/2020/feb/01/from-peppermint-candy-to-parasite-korean-cinemas-new-golden-age-parasite

      Delete
  4. What the heck...


    I Wanna Shake your Hand


    Oh these fires - tell me something
    I’m losing my command
    And I’ve - copped a thumping
    I need to shake some hands
    Get out and shake some ha-a-a-a-a-a-ands
    I gotta shake some hands

    Oh please - dance with me
    I am your Morrisman
    And please, say to me
    You’re such a great PM!
    And let me shake your ha-a-a-a-a-a-and
    I wanna shake your hand

    Just let me grab that thing that’s dangling
    By your side
    My desperation’s like my paunch
    I can’t hide…
    It’s too wide…
    For my strides…

    Oh yeah you’ve - got that something
    To hold it would be grand
    Cos I - need that one thing
    I need to shake your hand
    I wanna shake your ha-a-a-a-a-a-and
    Just fucking shake my hand!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hmmm. Kind of like a short fast march through modern (Liberal voting) suburbia.

      Delete
  5. Replies
    1. Yair, he's got just a bit of a gift, hasn't he.

      Delete

Comments older than two days are moderated and there will be a delay in publishing them.