Oh dear.
The chattering classes are having a field day, and the mice of Sydney are in an uproar.
No, not about Grange-gate, though it does seem odd to be careless about a bottle of Grange.
Rather, it seems as if the dream might be dead. The header says it all:
New Sydney airport should be in Canberra: O'Farrell
Oh it was a dream, a vision, with grand plans:
57 minutes to Sydney ... and less than a decade away
Canberra Airport will today unveil plans for a $140 million high speed rail (HSR) facility to be constructed adjacent to the new airport terminal.
“We have long been advocates of a high speed rail link between Canberra and Sydney, and that reality is getting closer with strong support from NSW Premier Barry O’Farrell and the ongoing stalemate over where to build Sydney’s second airport,” Canberra Airport Managing Director, Stephen Byron said. “Today Canberra Airport is proud to present plans for a superb, multi-modal, transport facility to underline the high speed rail’s integration into Canberra Airport, in accordance with Premier O’Farrell’s vision.
“This terminal will provide a seamless interface for passengers arriving in Canberra by air ready for their 57minute train trip to Sydney. “The facility will cost $140 million (in 2012 dollars) and take two years to build.
Courier, a bottle of Grange and be quick about it, we need to drown the sorrow at the dying of the dream, but sssh, hide it behind the pot plant on the front verandah,
Meanwhile, the comparisons of Tony Abbott to Stephen Conroy have begun:
Within weeks of taking office Treasurer Joe Hockey commissioned a Productivity Commission inquiry into the funding of infrastructure.
Its draft report released in March identified what it said was a classic example of how not to do it. “The National Broadband Network, Australia’s largest public infrastructure project, was commenced without a cost-benefit analysis having been done,” it said.
“It also appears that detailed analysis of the project was focused, from a relatively early stage, on how best to implement the government’s policy objectives, rather than considering the merits of different options.”
It sounds like Badgerys Creek. (here)
Oh indeed. Now with Sydney airport quite possibly the worst capital city airport in the western world - a gouging, inefficient monstrosity of useless delays in air and on ground, and consequent unnecessary costs - the pond has always thought a supplementary airport would be handy.
But Tony Abbott has done a classic policy on the run manoeuvre - most notably promising endless spending on roads, with nary a jot or a whistle about trains, with the matter of the curfew unresolved, proposed flight paths not specified, environmental assessments a decade old, and with the current owners of Sydney Airport having first right of refusal on any new build - and Max 'the axe' 'shit happens' Moore Wilton already having made his views on the need for a second airport very clear - a complete and utter waste of money, ex-ALP activists looking for new ways of wasting the people's money, and so on, here.
So jolly Joe and MAMIL Tony are just ex-ALP activists looking to piss money against the wall?
Perhaps the most fateful dodging and weaving came with the refusal to announce a very fast train service.
The theory, according to the Abbottians, is that there won't be enough business to justify a train in the early years, but if that's the case, why spend zillions on roads?
Is it not so much a case of Mr Infrastructure Man as Mr Stupid Infrastructure Man running so fast he doesn't realise he's rotated and heading towards the ground?
The pond was completely unnerved at the sight of the Daily Terror's Photoshopping:
Already a new episode of Air Crash Investigations?
One thing's certain. The pond has never read a more empty, blather laden piece of rhetoric than that supplied to the Daily Terror under Abbott's name, with the header Badgerys Creek airport will take Sydney to new heights.
The lack of specifics is only matched by the unctuous, smarmy forelock tugging in the direction of the Terror:
For many years, The Daily Telegraph has consistently argued for more infrastructure and better services in Western Sydney.
I thank The Telegraph for its campaign to deliver more jobs and infrastructure in Western Sydney.
And they think Mark Scott doing it with a hamster is funny? Is it as funny as Tony Abbott doing it with a newspaper?
As for the grand vision, it's back to the 1950s, and roads, roads, roads:
Building a new airport also means major road and transport upgrades in Western Sydney. The government has committed $1.5 billion towards WestConnex and will be making announcements in the coming days about the infrastructure that will accompany the airport.
Road and transport links must be ready and operating long before the airport is complete. Roads first, airport second, is our approach.
And with all of that, the first flight is still a decade away, at a minimum, which leaves plenty of time for Abbott's lack of vision to be given a slow roast and grind ...
In particular, the absence of vision in relation to rail (which is currently a mess in western Sydney), and with rubbery figures that sees only 130,000 people allegedly affected by aircraft noise from Sydney airport, and only 4,000 at Badgerys.
And then there's all the idle talk of an economic bonanza, and a gold rush, and employment opportunities, and 60,000 new jobs (4,000 initially, increasing over time to 60,000, here with forced video).
This presumably means - if you take the ACI's figure of 1000 jobs for every million passengers per annum (mppa it in a pdf here) - that Badgerys should over time be delivering 60 million passengers a year.
That would put it up in the top ten of aircraft and passenger movements, at least if you do a Greg Hunt on passenger movements at large airports here, with Dallas-Fort Worth clocking in at 60,436,266 in 2013.
It's rubbery figures all over again.
Is it possible for a politician to fuck up a sensible idea?
Of course it is. Have a look at the grand Malaise fucking up the NBN ...
Or take a look at David Rowe, and more Rowe here.
Point of order Mr Rowe.
Did you consider using a unicorn?
Abbott should have been in a position to present a coherent plan, and a logical case, and instead he's exposed his flank to rabid former allies, such as Jackie Kelly (Badgerys Creek: Jackie Kelly launches attack on PM Abbott over second airport plan).
What should have been a lay down misere promises to be a decade of lay down misery ...
Does the pond care? Not much. The pond will be long gone before the second airport is working, and likely enough, Abbott will also be just a dream ...
And the reality has always been that the new airport would struggle in its early days, and it would never reduce the operations at Mascot, and so the pond's friendly, reliable alarm clock - the first plane came in today on the third runway a few minutes before six today - will keep on working ...
Meanwhile the vision, the dream is dead, and it seems that the pond will have to crack open a flagon of claret.
ICAC heard evidence that the precious bottle was sent by courier to O'Farrell's home. Under oath Di Girolamo said O'Farrell even called him to thank him for it. O'Farrell insists, also under oath, he never received it. Who to believe? The Premier's problem is that we are asked to accept that the bottle was stolen or otherwise disappeared from outside his home in Roseville, which he describes as a ''friendly'' neighbourhood. That alone stretches the bounds of credibility.
His inability to recall the contents of a 30-second phone call to Di Girolamo the evening the bottle was purchased compounds the suspicion we are not getting the full story. The episode has exposed O'Farrell's lack of candour about his relationship with Di Girolamo. Rather than barely knowing each other as he has previously implied, it has emerged the pair had each other's private mobile numbers and were in frequent contact. (and the rest, with forced video, here)
Oh yes, the dream is well and truly dead. And it turns out it might not have been much of a drop in the first place - Penfolds Grange 1959: A little past its best.
Here you go Bazza - it's so good to share - and remember to look behind the pot plant.
Ah yes, the Sydney Morning Herald 10th December 1970, when men drove on roads and drank flagons of claret and Tony Abbott had his infrastructure insights by heading out on that highway, looking for adventure and whatever came his way ...
UPDATE: well the dream is now even longer gone, with Bazza biting the dust, as recorded in NSW Premier Barry O'Farrell to resign over evidence he gave to ICAC.
Barry O’Farrell: “I still can't recall the receipt of a gift of a bottle of 1959 Grange, I can't explain what happened to that bottle of wine.”
ReplyDeletehttp://www.smh.com.au/nsw/nsw-premier-barry-ofarrell-resigns-20140416-36qwv.html
Here is what happened to that wine, Barry. When the wine was consumed it travelled through the body from the mouth, to the stomach. It then moved swiftly into the bloodstream. From here, the alcohol moved throughout the circulatory system, coming into contact with the brain, lungs and other organs before being filtered out by the liver and kidneys. It then was excreted through the urine as waste.
Pigs might fly... From Badgery Creek.
ReplyDeleteThe C36 came flying down the line a few hours ago. Sparks a'flying and crew shovelling coal into the firebox. It was a sight to behold. Why can't we go back to such brilliant technology? I'm sure western Sydney could benefit.
ReplyDeleteGlen Miller says it best.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzHIn5S-RbY&feature=kp
Can't beat Dorothy Dandridge and the Nicholas brothers.
DeleteThe splendid vision clouded: http://www.strongchoices.qld.gov.au/
ReplyDeleteCoal royalties? Don't you worry about that.
Further..
Reef health
Major causes of coral loss since 1985 are:
•48% storms and cyclones
•42% crowns of thorns starfish
•10% bleaching.
http://www.reeffacts.qld.gov.au/
Oh yeah bullshitters? Then what causes increased frequency of storms and cyclones, crown of thorns, and bleaching?
Poor, poor little Tony. This was supposed to be Tony's day. A day where he could announce a glorious new Airport for the serfs of Sydney. A positive day where he could actually say he was improving things for the rabble in the Western Suburbs.
ReplyDeleteThen in the afternoon, noble Tony (it surely isn't too early to think of enoblement) would welcome the glorious royals to Australia's shores. A basking in the lime light, a photo for the world media, an opportunity to look statesman like and possibly lordly. A perfect day, a wonderful day, an excellent day for Tony.
Instead it was all about a fucking bottle of red wine and had Tony ever drank Grange. Even worse some woman had the temerity to ask poor Tony about corruption amongst the Libs.
A lesser man would have just smacked her in the face but Tony refrained as both a gentleman and a scholar and just asked her to apologise for asking the question, whilst questioning what had happened to decency in the media.
Poor, poor Tony. A lovely day ruined by drink.
DiddyWrote
Keeping in mind the “in-house” LNP. sexual smears and jokes about Julia Gillard, not to mention the innuendo of her relationship with the union man twenty years before and “The Menu” at the LNP. function all implying that Julia Gillard was a “Scarlet Woman”, the author of "The Scarlet Letter"…..could this episode with O’Farrell with the gift of RED WINE now be refered to as the incident of : “The Scarlet Drink ” ?
ReplyDelete