Sunday, August 03, 2025

In which Polonius and the dog botherer do Gaza, the onion muncher throws a stone, and Jennie again gasses the country ...

 

Thank you in advance for your attention to the many matters that will be raised in this Sunday meditation ...




A barking mad wannabe dictator, what could go wrong?



Eek, it's Dr Strangelove v. the Ruskis. 

Oh hang on, according to Tom Nichols in The Atlantic, it's just a distraction: Trump's Irresponsible Nuclear Threat, The president is rattling a nuclear saber as a distraction. (archive link)

Phew, that's a relief, and while at The Atlantic, the pond took in Rogé Karma's The Mystery of the Strong Economy Has Finally Been Solved, Turns out it wasn’t actually that strong. (archive link)

The Trump administration has found itself caught between deflecting blame for the weak economic numbers and denying the numbers’ validity. In an interview with CNN this morning, Miran admitted that the new jobs report “isn’t ideal,” but went on to attribute it to various “anomalous factors,” including data quirks and reduced immigration. (Someone should ask Miran why immigration is down.) And this afternoon, Trump posted a rant on Truth Social accusing the BLS commissioner of cooking the books to make him look bad. “I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY,” he wrote. “She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.” He then went on to argue, not for the first time, that Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell should be fired for hamstringing the economy with high interest rates. These defenses are, of course, mutually exclusive: If the bad numbers are fake, why should Trump be mad at Powell?
In these confused denials, one detects a shade of desperation on Trump’s part. Of course, everything could end up being fine. Maybe economists will be wrong and the economy will rebound with newfound strength in the second half of the year. But that’s looking like a far worse bet than it did just 24 hours ago.

And so on, and put it another way ...



And then it was on with Ross Andersen's Every Scientific Empire Comes to an End, America’s run as the premier techno-superpower may be over. (archive link)

Foreign researchers have recently been made to feel unwelcome in the U.S. They have been surveilled and harassed. The Trump administration has made it more difficult for research institutions to enroll them. Top universities have been placed under federal investigation. Their accreditation and tax-exempt status have been threatened. The Trump administration has proposed severe budget cuts at the agencies that fund American science—the NSF, the NIH, and NASA, among others—and laid off staffers in large numbers. Existing research grants have been canceled or suspended en masse. Committees of expert scientists that once advised the government have been disbanded. In May, the president ordered that all federally funded research meet higher standards for rigor and reproducibility—or else be subject to correction by political appointees.
Not since the Red Scare, when researchers at the University of California had to sign loyalty oaths, and those at the University of Washington and MIT were disciplined or fired for being suspected Communists, has American science been so beholden to political ideology. At least during the McCarthy era, scientists could console themselves that despite this interference, federal spending on science was surging. Today, it’s drying up.
Three-fourths of American scientists who responded to a recent poll by the journal Nature said they are considering leaving the country. They don’t lack for suitors. China is aggressively recruiting them, and the European Union has set aside a €500 million slush fund to do the same. National governments in Norway, Denmark, and France—nice places to live, all—have green-lighted spending sprees on disillusioned American scientists. The Max Planck Society, Germany’s elite research organization, recently launched a poaching campaign in the U.S., and last month, France’s Aix-Marseille University held a press conference announcing the arrival of eight American “science refugees.”

And so on, and the pond felt curiously light-headed and light-hearted, even a bit giggly, but if you cruise the magazines, soon enough you'll come across a downer, such as Mohammed R. Mhawish in The New YorkerTreating Gaza’s Collective Trauma, In Gaza, where displaced children play games called “air strike” and act out death, the lack of mental-health resources has become another emergency.(*archive link)

After three hundred days of war, the UNRWA issued an analysis describing Gaza’s trauma as “chronic and unrelenting”—a collective embodiment of continuous traumatic stress disorder (C.T.S.D.), a condition that stems from living under relentless trauma. Unlike post-traumatic stress disorder, which sets in after a difficult experience, C.T.S.D. is what occurs when there is no end in sight. Gazans have adapted to chronic danger, living in a state of hypervigilance, emotional numbness, and dissociation amid the slow erasure of any imagined future.
The effect on children has been especially catastrophic. By 2024, UNICEF estimated that almost all of Gaza’s 1.2 million children require urgent mental-health and psychosocial support. Not a single child has been untouched by the war. Many aren’t sleeping, or they wake screaming throughout the night, clinging to their companions in terror. A number of children have developed speech problems. Some reënact bombings with stones, play games called “air strike,” or act out death.
By February, 2024, UNICEF estimated that at least seventeen thousand children were unaccompanied or had been separated from their families. By April of that year, the Gaza health ministry had documented more than twelve thousand wounded children, a number that, in 2025, has increased to fifty thousand killed or injured, according to a report by UNICEF. Alone, displaced, and traumatized, the children who are still alive are extremely psychologically vulnerable. Even before this most recent war, Gaza’s children were already showing signs of strain: a 2022 Save the Children survey found that eighty-four per cent felt fear and seventy-eight per cent lived with grief. In November, 2024, a report by the Community Training Center for Crisis Management found that ninety-six per cent of children living through this war feel that their death is imminent, and nearly half said that they want to die.

And so on, and sorry Mr Mhawish, what you really need is a serve of reptile stew, and after you've dined on that, you too will appreciate the finer points of mass starvation, ethnic cleansing and genocide.

You see, Mr Mhawish, the Zionist hive mind was very busy this weekend, with parade of useless idiots...

Useful idiots of the West target Israel with lies, blood libel
The left of politics and gullible media go to extreme lengths to vilify Israel. Why are so many eager to swallow these lies?
By Gemma Tognini
Columnist

The pond has already noted Julie conflating a demonstration with anti-Semitism:

Making a national icon a symbol of anti-Semitism is a bridge way too far
The Palestine Action Group’s bid to march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge underscores the theme of the week: history, and the attempt to walk all over it.
By Julie Szego

And then there was an urging to love ethnic cleansing and genocide, right or wrong:

To all my fellow Jews, I urge you not to let the hate harden your hearts
I want Jewish children to feel like there is nothing wrong with loving Israel, with feeling connected to it in a deep and almost unfathomable way.
By Michael Gawenda

The dog botherer was also in on the act:

‘Statehood’ push merely helps Hamas
Almost two years after the October 7 atrocities, when Anthony Albanese failed to clamp down on anti-Israeli hatred and baulked at offering proper support to Israel’s defence, we are in a worse place.
By Chris Kenny
Associate Editor (National Affairs)

The pond noted only reptile willing to do a little pushback:

Netanyahu at crossroads over Gaza
A series of miscalculations have undermined Benjamin Netanyahu’s campaign against Hamas as Israel becomes more isolated internationally.
By Cameron Stewart

Indeed, indeed, put it another way ...




The pond had hoped to escape all that by heading down the rabbit hole with Polonius and his prattle.

After all Polonius has been a mainstay of the pond's Sundays, a man who thinks he's a dog and who brings a furry vision to bear on all matters.

Oh dear, just more of the same...



The header: Palestinians’ only hope for future is removal of Hamas,Reflect on Bob Carr’s unequivocal position about Israel when, within days of his outburst, members of the Arab League called for Hamas to disarm and leave Gaza.

The caption: As part of ’The New York Declaration’, Arab states for the first time condemned Hamas’s massacre of Israelis on October 7, 2023.

The magickal advice: This article contains features which are only available in the web version, Take me there

Polonius didn't much mind mass starvation. It was Bob Carr wot got up his nose ...

How times change. On July 28, Bob Carr, the former Labor NSW premier and former foreign affairs minister, was interviewed on ABC Radio National Breakfast by Sally Sara. It was essentially a soft discussion – with one exception.
Sara put it to Carr that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong “have made it clear that certain conditions need to be met before Australia should recognise a Palestinian state, including hostages being released, better governance from the Palestinian Authority (based in Ramallah, on the West Bank), for example”. She then asked: “Are they reasonable conditions?”
To which Carr replied: “Well, yes, yes, yes. But those conditions are outweighed by a bigger fact and a bigger truth. Namely, that a vast civilian population is starving, that deaths are coming fast, unspeakable cruelty is being visited against babies and children in the enforcement of something not seen in the modern world.”

Well yes, but Polonius wasn't going to have any of that, and further proof was provided by way of a snap, Bob Carr. Picture: NCA NewsWire / Dylan Coker



Polonius resumed with a link embedded in the text: Carr’s position was unequivocal. 

As the pond has noted many times, such links never allow the hive mind readership to escape the hive. Once you book into the lizard Oz, you can never leave, and so anyone who clicked on it landed on this ...


Good on you Nick, a genuine devotion to the killing fields, as befits someone parading in the lizard Oz.

That wicked Bob Carr and his faux comparsions made Polonius furious ...

To wit, that Israel should desist in its war against Hamas, leaving the terrorist group in charge of Gaza without the release of its Israeli hostages – alive and dead.

Meanwhile, to wit and to woo the reptiles, the slaughter and the wanton destruction goes on, and surely serves as a recruiting tool for a new generation of terrorists, with likely the only way to eradicate Hamas involving the destruction of the entire current population of Gaza. 

But that's already been mooted many a time - how else to arrive at the new Riviera, with the remnants of Gaza herded off out of sight to some desert somewhere.

The pond digresses, because Polonius was on a history roll ...

That was on July 28. On July 31 The Australian reported that Arab leaders have called on Hamas to disarm and leave Gaza. The news was that the Arab League including Egypt, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates had signed on to “The New York Declaration”.
The intention of “The New York Declaration” is to bring about a situation whereby a demilitarised Palestinian state would come into existence living side by side with Israel. Specifically, the declaration entails that Hamas must hand over weapons to the Palestinian Authority, which was driven out of Gaza by Hamas in June 2007, after which Gaza became a dictatorship.
As part of the declaration, Arab states for the first time condemned Hamas’s massacre of Israelis on October 7, 2023. It is interesting that many of Israel’s high-profile opponents in Australia have not condemned Hamas for October 7. 

Just to show how the hive mind works, take this next link ...

Rather, on the October 9, 2023 demonstration outside the Sydney Opera House and elsewhere ...




You see? It doesn't actually demonstrate much, it just maintains a vaguely Islamophobic air, and it allows Polonius to make all sorts of assertions...

...many of the protesters supported Hamas. 

Did Polonius do a survey of the crowd? 

Or did he simply read a fellow reptile raging about Kristallnacht-like scenes? 

Did he then feel the need to rebuke his fellow reptile for using that sort of inflammatory rhetoric?

Not likely, he's all in on only certain forms of history:

This was before Israel retaliated against Hamas with a military invasion of Gaza on October 27, 2023.
And so it came to pass that within a few days of Carr’s outburst, members of the Arab League stated that the priority in Gaza was for Hamas to disarm.
Sara did not challenge Carr when he made the hyperbolic claim that “there’s a pattern of behaviour here that really demands comparison with the worst of the last 100 years of Stalin’s Ukraine, of the Warsaw Ghetto, of Mao’s Great Leap Forward”.
Carr is a well-informed man. He knows Communist dictator Josef Stalin’s Soviet Union initiated a forced famine in Ukraine in 1932-33. Some four million Ukrainians died in what is called the Holodomor. Not one of Stalin’s murderers agreed to any food aid of any kind.
Likewise the Warsaw Ghetto in early 1943. This was the siege by Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany against the Jews living in the Polish capital. It was a small part of Hitler’s genocide, which led to six million Jewish deaths in total. The Nazis made no attempt whatsoever to provide food aid to Jews in Warsaw. Likewise in Mao’s forced famine between 1958 and 1962 in which some 45 million Chinese starved to death. In all three instances, Stalin, Hitler and Mao commenced the hostilities.

Indeed, indeed, and none of them can compare to God when She's in a bad mood ...

For yet seven days, and I will cause it to rain upon the earth forty days and forty nights; and every living substance that I have made will I destroy from off the face of the earth.

The original inspirational genocide.

Turns out She had a real bloodlust ...

When the Israelites arrive in the Promised Land, they are commanded to annihilate "the Hittites and the Amorites, the Canaanites and the Perizzites, the Hivites and the Jebusites" who already lived there, to avoid being tempted into idolatry.

In Exodus 17, Amalek is introduced as a partially nomadic group that attacked the Israelites following their departure from Egypt. Moses defeats Amalek by a miraculous victory. In 1 Samuel 15:3, Israelite king Saul is told by God via the prophet Samuel: "Now go, attack Amalek, and proscribe [kill and dedicate to YHWH] all that belongs to him. Spare no one, but kill alike men and women, infants and sucklings, oxen and sheep, camels and asses!" Saul's failure to be sufficiently harsh with Amalek is portrayed as leading to his downfall. (Genocide in the Hebrew Bible)

Wouldn't want to be a sissy, and so maintain the rage is all the reptile Zionist go, Labor Friends of Israel co-convenor Mike Kelly says the sudden push for a Palestinian state is a “meaningless gesture”. Mr Kelly told Sky News Australia that it can be seen as a “reward” for Hamas’ terrorism. “So that is sending a very bad signal, and we don’t want to go down that road,” he said.




You see, everybody's doing it, and a few have gots to die, and so long as they're not Polonius, all is well in the world ...

Just sit back and observe and perhaps even enjoy the killing fields (from a distance of course);

As Carr surely understands, all wars are brutal occasions in which, sadly, civilians die. Most would accept that World War II was a just conflict in that the Allies defeated Hitler’s Nazi Germany. However, it led to many millions of civilian casualties.
In his book, The Bombers And The Bombed: Allied Air War Over Europe, 1940-1945 (Penguin, 2013), British historian Richard Overy wrote that between 1939 and 1945 hundreds of European cities and hundreds more small townships and villages were subjected to an aerial bombing. It was conducted by the Allied powers – Britain, the British Commonwealth and the US.
Overy said: “During the course of the conflict, a staggering estimate of around 600,000 European civilians were killed by bomb attack and well over a million more were seriously wounded, in some cases physically or mentally disabled for life.” The conflict ended when Hitler suicided on April 30, 1945 and Admiral Karl Donitz formally began discussions that led to Germany’s total surrender on May 7, 1945.
Carr has not called for a Hamas surrender in the Israel-Gaza war. But now, among others, key members of the Arab League have. Writing in the London Telegraph on July 31, Adrian Blomfield reported that “Israel’s long and bloody war in Gaza has left Hamas so enfeebled that Arab officials believe there is now a golden opportunity to deliver a final blow”.
On Sky News’ The Kenny Report on July 29, Chris Kenny interviewed Mike Kelly, a former member of the Australian Defence Force who held ministerial roles in the Rudd and Gillard Labor governments. Moreover, Kelly is a lawyer. He told Kenny that Carr “is not an expert on the laws of armed conflict … there are very few people who are”.
In response to Carr’s claim that “Israel is using starvation as a weapon of war”, Kelly said Carr is “not an investigator, he’s not on the ground, he doesn’t know what’s going on; nobody who’s not on the ground will be able to make judgments about this”.

If the pond might be so bold, the resort to "experts" is craven ... it's pretty clear what's going down.

Even King Donald noticed that Gaza was a few big Macs short of a meal, and the recent attempts to rectify the situation are just more humbug, per Haaretz (archive link) ...





Never mind, they're dying in a noble Polonial cause ...

Kelly acknowledged the problem “when Israel’s fighting a war against the terrorist organisation (Hamas) that … is using the civil population as a weapon” and as “propaganda opportunities”. Kelly concluded by quoting Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas as having called Hamas the “sons of dogs”. The reference is a BBC report of April 24.
The worst outcome for the Israelis and the overwhelming majority of Palestinians would be for Hamas to emerge from the conflict still in charge of Gaza while suppressing Palestinians.
Overy wrote about “the devastated urban wastelands immediately after the war” in 1945, and how some wondered “would Europe ever recover?”. But it did.

So much for the millions who died. It so happens when you're dead you're dead for a very long time, and if you've been malformed by malnourishment, you might wonder about the struggle to go on living.

But confronted by suffering and death, Polonius is that all too common phenomenon, the self-satisfied white Xian, oblivious to, or uncaring about, the suffering of others.

Here, have a break, have a childhood treat ...



The pond did think about adding the dog botherer to the collection, but he was even more splenetic and spiteful ...

Take this opening gobbet as a sample:

A couple of times on air this week I suggested the hateful anti-Israel/pro-Palestinian protesters should have their planned Sydney Harbour Bridge march shifted to the tunnel. It would be more relevant, I argued, because the protesters could experience claustrophobic surroundings and perhaps think of the clandestine tunnel-building Hamas carried out under Gaza by diverting billions of dollars of foreign aid over two decades.Perhaps the pro-Palestinian mob would even be forced to think of the hostages (and hostage cadavers) still secreted in these modern catacombs. But now the idea is no longer a mere barb, a pro-Israel group has made an application for just such a march, providing a telling counterpoint to the bridge application by the anti-Israel activists (they have since withdrawn it in consideration of police resourcing).
The Gaza tunnels were built not only to hide weapons and captives but as tactical thoroughfares to facilitate precisely the kind of prolonged siege that is still dragging on. Israel completely exited Gaza two decades ago, forcing Jewish settlers to leave, withdrawing its soldiers, and handing the former Egyptian territory to the Palestinians, but rather than build something peaceful and prosperous, the Gazans under Hamas, undermined their territory - literally.

Actually they literally locked them into a prison and left them to stew in their own juices...and evem worse. Benji's mob were in on the game and even gave money to Hamas to facilitate the imprisonment.

Try this alternative history ... (that's an archive link)



Being a climate science denialist means famine denialism comes easily to the dog botherer ... and at this point the pond broke, and decided cut out all the distracting snaps, and to dish out selected samples of the hate and the bile in one leaden lump of vitriol ...

With hard choices required in Gaza and the Middle East, the posturing from Albanese and others amounts to diplomatic virtue-signalling. Howard-era foreign minister Alexander Downer told me on Sky News this week that these proclamations will achieve “absolutely nothing”.
Even worse, Downer said the use of “Hamas propaganda” against Israel is “empowering Hamas all the more, and encouraging Hamas all the more”. The country’s longest-serving foreign minister said: “Honestly, it is complete madness … driven by domestic political game-playing.”
Labor’s domestic preoccupations are clear. It has an interest in appealing to Muslim voters, who outnumber Jewish voters by almost 10 to one and live mainly in Labor electorates; it also seeks to appease radical young voters to stem the drift to the Greens; and it likes to disassociate itself from the conservative figures of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump.
It is not clear that the national interest, much less global strategic precedents, get a look in. Albanese and his Foreign Minister, Penny Wong, do not seem to comprehend the consequences of what they are doing.
The truth is that through the Albanese government’s gormless posture on the Gazan war, and spineless response to anti-Semitism at home, Australia is greatly diminished almost 22 months on from the October 7 atrocities. Albanese and Wong have abandoned Israel, rewarded the Islamist extremist terrorism of Hamas, failed the Australian Jewish community, and diverged from the Middle East strategy of our major security ally, the US.
The Twitter-like depth of public debate and the willingness of politicians to react to emotive and misleading journalism or social media memes rather than facts has been borne out this week. That harrowing photo of cerebral palsy victim Mohammed Zakaria al-Mutawaq was deceptively used as proof of children starving in Gaza by The New York Times, The Sydney Morning Herald, the ABC and countless other media outlets around the world.
Politicians including Albanese, Starmer and even Trump were happy to cite “images” as their conclusive evidence of children starving, even though Israel denied the crisis, the vast amounts of aid going to Gaza are a known quantity, and the overwhelming evidence of vision from Gaza shows adults and children who are not starving. Besides, if there is starvation in Gaza then blame must surely rest with Hamas because it has not only prolonged the war but deliberately tried to sabotage the US-Israeli aid delivery program, including by shooting at Palestinians and aid workers.
Executive Council of Australian Jewry Alex Ryvchin says The New York Times “should correct” the image used on their front page, which falsely depicted starvation in Gaza. Mr Ryvchin says the newspaper’s images “feeds into a particular narrative” they are trying to perpetuate. “This has enormous legs and it’s part of a broader disinformation campaign,” Mr Ryvchin told Sky News host Chris Kenny. “Once we have these sorts of hyperbolic claims and disinformation, it makes it harder to actually deal with the problem in a rational, coherent sense. “It needs a solution, but sensationalism and false reporting like that get us further away from finding that solution.”

As usual in these reptile diatribes there comes a moment when the reptiles realise they've gone too far and that they should attempt a semblance of balance, so here comes a billy goat butt ...

Butt, and the pond uses the word advisedly, it's a very small but...

Pointing out these facts is not to deny the clear human trauma in Gaza, nor ignore the dire need to end the war and save civilians. 

And that butt was immediately followed by a butt rebuttal ...

But the calculated emergence of allegations about starvation as a weapon of war needs to be judged against the facts, not propaganda from Hamas-controlled authorities in Gaza.
An ABC journalist harangued Sussan Ley at a media conference early this week, demanding the Opposition Leader declare a starvation crisis in Gaza, a call that could only be based on Ley’s perusal of media reports. This is the post-modern/post-truth world, where motives and sanctimony matter more than facts.
Most politicians and journalists were declaring widespread starvation in Gaza based on a handful of photographs without medical context. When The New York Times admitted their photo had highlighted a chronically ill child rather than one suffering from a lack of humanitarian food aid, some other media organisations posted similar updates, but they did not apologise or admit their starvation claims were unproven.
“Israel is fighting a war against a terrorist organisation that is using the civilian population as a weapon, and the propaganda opportunities that they get out of that have been exploited mercilessly,” said Kelly, responding to wild claims of deliberate starvation and worse against Israel from former Labor foreign minister Bob Carr and Education Minister Jason Clare. “And we have seen so much clueless and credulous response by media outlets and politicians who have just been completely sucked in by this stuff,” their former Labor colleague said.
The retired politician and ADF colonel described Hamas’s “new business model” of “looting and stealing” aid supplies to fund its terrorist operations and control the population. Kelly had no qualms about explaining that Hamas is vicious enough to shoot its own people in carrying out this agenda.
Downer and Kelly are on a ­bipartisan ticket about what is ­required to bring the Gaza war to an end. It is precisely the opposite of the statehood push we are seeing from Albanese and his European and Canadian mates.
“We need a full-court press by the international community to ignore this propaganda circus that we’ve seen from Hamas and say, look you have to lay down your arms, release the hostages, then of course the war ends,” Kelly said.
“The pressure shouldn’t be on the Israelis, the pressure should be on Hamas,” said Downer.
“Release the hostages, stop the fighting, allow food to be properly distributed.”
These two experienced hands from either side of the political aisle must be worth listening to, but Albanese has not sought Kelly’s counsel. Ley, on the other hand, showed wisdom and moral clarity this week by repeatedly putting the onus on Hamas rather than Israel.
Sky News host Chris Kenny says recognising a Palestinian state is a case of “politicking” coming before reality. “The move by the UK, Canada and dozens of other nations to recognise the non-existent nation of Palestine is a case of politicking triumphing over reality,” Mr Kenny said. “And of virtue signalling trumping hard work and real policy. At best it is putting the cart before the horse, at worst it is rewarding the bloodthirsty slaughter of innocent people, carried out by the Islamist terrorists of Hamas.”
The dominant media narrative has matched the political zeitgeist, characterised by the demonisation of Israel. When politics and media work in such a synchronised way the truth tends to go missing (remember the Covid pandemic and the shared political and media penchant for alarmism and censorship).
During the Gaza war the media and politicians have run hard on false claims that Israel bombed a hospital and killed 500 people, erroneous accusations that Israel deliberately killed aid workers, and ridiculous warnings that 14,000 babies were about to die within 48 hours. Media and politicians routinely quote casualty figures and battlefield assessments from unaccountable Gazan authorities (in other words, they quote the Hamas terrorist organisation) yet openly doubt statements from Israel.
While Western media have been cheering the statehood push as some sort of anti-war progress, even ABC Middle East correspondent Allyson Horn had to admit it was merely symbolic. “The reality is it is unlikely to change anything on the ground in Gaza or Israel at this point in time,” Horn said in an online video.
Which begs the question, what is the point? This is the very definition of virtue-signalling – making a statement or taking some faux action that demonstrates empathy and a progressive political bent but does absolutely nothing for the dilemma at hand.
Almost two years after the October 7 atrocities, when Albanese and state authorities failed to clamp down on anti-Israeli hatred and baulked at offering proper support to Israel’s defence, we are in a worse place.
Australia’s ambivalence over Islamist extremist messaging, impotence against anti-Semitism, diplomatic distancing and demonisation of Israel could only please the Islamist terrorists of Hamas and their supporters.

By the time the pond got to  "political zeitgeist" and "virtue-signalling" and all the other mindless reptile short cuts and verbal tics, the pond was pleased it had left this undigestible lump of verbal porridge in an unreadable form, sans snaps so that the hate speech might stand in its own mess.

Here, have a visual reward, having gone without the images designed to distract while reading the dog botherer ... 





And so to a treat, and who or what better than the onion muncher, in mourning for a fellow ratbag ...



The header: Former Treasury chief and national treasure Jone Stone still offers us wisdom, inspiration, John Stone wanted everything to be the very best whether that was a Treasury minute, the policy of a government, or the state of our nation. Naturally enough, he was often disappointed.

The caption:  Former Treasury chief and Nationals senator John Stone has died aged 96.

The strange invitation: This article contains features which are only available in the web version, Take me there

What's droll here is to see how the onion muncher tiptoes around all that was problematic with this stone thrower. For that you have to read Dominic Kelly's portrait in Inside Story, John Stone, political activist, The former Treasury head was revealed to be an arch-reactionary in his long second career.

You're not supposed to speak ill of the dead, but when the dead spent much of their time alive speaking ill of the living, why not break that convention, especially for a Quad ranter?

Of course it takes an arch-reactionary to recognise another arch-reactionary:

Advancing age did nothing to dull Stone’s passion for political debate. In March 2016, conservative columnist Miranda Devine coined the term “del-con” to describe those “delusional conservatives” — including Stone — who remained firmly in Tony Abbott’s camp following Malcolm Turnbull’s successful coup. Though Stone preferred the term “dis-con” — disaffected, rather than delusional — he embraced the criticism. It prompted a regular “dis-con notes” column in the Spectator, where he attacked Turnbull ferociously, mocked the Liberal “bed-wetters” who installed him, and gave forthright advice to Liberal MPs about standing up for conservative values. He urged a restoration of Abbott or, failing that, a new leader with comparable right-wing bona fides, such as Peter Dutton.

Yes, two of the great Liberal disasters in the past few decades, the onion muncher himself and the mutton Dutton - even more disastrous than Stone's embrace of Joh for Canberra - and worth bearing in mind when one of those epic disasters turns to providing a eulogy for that devotee of Liberal disasters ...

With John Stone, whom we honour and mourn, it’s hard to find any sphere in which he did not excel. He was a brilliant student. He was outstanding at sport. He was the 1951 West Australian Rhodes Scholar. He swiftly rose through the ranks of Treasury – in those days, clearly, the elite of the Australian Public Service. For five years, he was Treasury head; and, in that capacity, helped tutor Paul Keating, Labor’s greatest treasurer and less, directly, Bob Hawke, Labor’s greatest prime minister.
John was, for three years, a member of the Senate and a Coalition frontbencher. He is the only federal departmental head, thus far, subsequently elected to the federal parliament. And after leaving parliament, as well as serving on the boards of some leading public companies, he was a fellow of the Institute of Public Affairs, a friend of the Centre for Independent Studies, and the leading spirit in the foundation of two important intellectual bodies: the HR Nicholls Society, to promote freedom of association in the workplace, and; the Samuel Griffith Society, to promote respect for our Constitution and for the rule of law more generally.
As well, John was a prodigious contributor to newspapers and magazines – especially Quadrant – to which he gave an almost sublimely perceptive essay on the imperfectability of politics, in which he declared, rightly in my opinion, that John Winston Howard was our greatest-ever prime minister.
In everything he did, his great stay and strength, his soulmate, was his late wife, Nancy, and his great pride was his children – all of whom, in their own way, are faithful reflections of their parents.

He was also a racist and a bigot, but never mind, have a snap, John Stone, head of Treasury (1979-1984) and National Party senator (1987-1990).




On the onion muncher munched ...

John Stone was an intellectual perfectionist. He wanted everything to be the very best – whether that was a Treasury minute, the policy of a government, or the state of our nation. Naturally enough, he was often disappointed – especially with politicians – because politics is the art of the possible, even if its best practicians are constantly seeking to expand the bounds of what’s possible in the best possible direction. It’s typical of John that he wanted governments to do the right thing, for the right reason, in the right way.
It’s often said that he opposed the decision of the Hawke government, late in 1983, to float the dollar. Indeed, this canard has been repeated in some of the obituaries. In fact, what he opposed was the lack of due process: a governmental decision, made without a proper cabinet discussion, and without proper Treasury advice, about all the other policies that might have to be changed in order to optimise the decision to float. But as he said in his rightly celebrated Shann Memorial Lecture in 1984 – delivered, quite properly, after he had already resigned as Treasury head – the decision to float the dollar was one of the best decisions ever made for the long-term benefit of our economy. It’s also typical of John that, having made it abundantly clear what he thought, he never bothered to take issue with the critics – leaving the crystal-clear record to speak for itself.

Cue another snap, John Stone in 1987.



Is there an irony here?

Think about this one, which featured in the lizard Oz obit.:

Mr Howard said he embraced much of the economic advice he received from Mr Stone but the pair “parted company politically” over the 1987 push to install Sir Joh Bjelke-Petersen as prime minister. Mr Stone was elected to the Senate the same year. “He gave that push considerable economic credibility. The former Queensland premier’s very conservative views on social issues were attractive to Stone,” Mr Howard said.
“His sure-footed and logical approach to economics deserted him when it came to politics.”

Now that's an admirable understatement. 

Put it another way: Stone went off with the pixies to the land above the magic faraway tree, where the onion muncher also now dwells ...

In that Shann Memorial Lecture – ostensibly about fiscal extravagance, tariff protection, and industrial arbitration – John was actually highlighting three much deeper and more abiding faults in our Australian approach to government: first, our tendency to think that government – especially government spending – can solve all problems; second, our tendency to think that somehow we can shield ourselves from competition and what’s going on in the wider world, and; third, that workers live in a different economic universe – one governed by a Thomistic notion of the just price. John’s message, then, is just as relevant today as it was in 1984. We are running deficits stretching as far as the eye can see. We have a government addicted to subsidising politically correct business ventures. And we have a workforce once more being subjected to attempted union control – even if that means fewer jobs and less prosperity. Not for a moment, though, do these recurring challenges suggest that John failed in his efforts to counter economic folly – merely that some battles are never finally won.
In that 1984 Shann lecture, he described our political class as “unworthy men masquerading as leaders”. Perhaps that was an overly harsh description of the parliament that then included our best Labor and best Liberal prime ministers. But it did hint at the great truth: that no elected politician – indeed, probably no human being – can be as good as he or she should be. Our challenge is not to achieve an impossible perfection, but “to strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield” in the quest to be better.
The fact that he himself sought, just three years later, to become one of those “unworthy men masquerading as leaders” was actually John’s tribute to the significance of public life. And his failure, in 1990, to win the seat of Fairfax was no reflection on him – just on a generally miserable national campaign. Anyone, indeed, who could beat Bob Hawke in an election – the 1951 University of Western Australia Guild election – had the right stuff for public life.
Inevitably, there is a sense of loss; we are sad because we are human. But really, we should be uplifted and inspired by this life that testifies to so many wonderful possibilities, if only we are prepared to “have a go”, which John always was. There’s a figure of speech referencing “drips wearing down stone”; I like to think John was a stone wearing down drips!
At the close of his Shann lecture, John posed the question: “Have Australians, today, the will to do great things together again?” He believed that we were. So what is there to be said but this: we should not let him down.
An edited extract of former prime minister Tony Abbott’s eulogy at the celebration of John Stone’s life in Sydney on Wednesday.

Here, have another irony ...

...On the far right of the political spectrum something sociologists have come to call "new racism" seems to be taking hold. Old racism argued that the intractable differences between human groups were rooted in biology and blood. This form of racism was discredited by Hitler and the Holocaust. A new racism took its place. It argued that differences between human collectivities were based on the ultimate incompatibility not of blood and biology but of culture and religion.
After September 11, in Australia, this kind of new racism emerged with surprising swiftness. Let one important example suffice. Former Treasury Secretary John Stone had long been an opponent of Asian immigration. Following September 11 the focus of his concern shifted to Muslims instead. According to Stone, Australia was, from the cultural point of view, a "Judeo-Christian" country. Because of its supposed incompatibility with such a culture, Stone argued now that all future Muslim immigration must end.
Stone was aware, of course, that on account of his suggestion he would be accused of racism. Such accusations were, he claimed, both mischievous and wrong. In advocating a racially discriminatory immigration policy Stone pointed out he had no interest in the colour of a potential migrant's skin. The only issue that concerned him was "culture" and not "race". In light of the academic definition of new racism, John Stone and his supporters unwittingly supplied an almost perfect textbook case. (Nine rag, possible paywall)

In short, he was a stone thrower, and he mainly left behind many broken windows.

Here, have some visual relief ...



And so to a bonus to the bonus, but it's only a three minutes read, so the reptiles say, and it completes the coverage of climate science this weekend ...

Think of it as a light soufflé or a digestif to help wash down all that's gone before.



The header: We need a gas reservation scheme that prioritises domestic energy needs, A Future Made in Australia will be nothing more than fine sentiment unless gas supply is assured for industry, households and our energy security.

The caption: A worker walks through the Queensland Curtis Liquefied Natural Gas project site. Photographer: Patrick Hamilton/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The malicious, endlessly repeated mantra: This article contains features which are only available in the web version,Take me there

Jennie isn't, of course, interested in gassing the country to save the planet, she's interested in gassing the country to gas the country ...

The government’s review of gas markets is timely as the interaction of our domestic and export markets is dysfunctional. LNG is exported without regard for our domestic needs. We’re the second-largest exporter of LNG, yet facing domestic gas supply shortages on the east coast. Our uncontracted gas is being sold on international spot markets, while at home our energy ministers are considering importing LNG.
This is contrary to commitments made before the LNG operations commenced at Gladstone.
For example, Santos explained it: “ … may initially supply domestic gas markets, but it is not diverting gas from local markets to export markets … therefore the project has no direct implications for domestic gas prices. The gas to supply the LNG facility will come from newly developed CSG fields.”
The AWU’s campaign for a 15 per cent gas reservation was prescient and would have avoided subsequent market distortions. The Gillard government’s rejection of the proposal was shortsighted, as a gas reservation scheme had been operating successfully in WA.
Former ACCC chair Rod Sims often raised issues that needed to be addressed. Gas meant for domestic markets was being diverted to fill shortfalls in overseas contracts.

How could it be compleat without including a spray of gas from petulant Peta? Sky News host Peta Credlin discusses how the government has been “forced to back down” on the aim to cut out domestic gas use. “The tale of two cities today in relation to decisions on gas, in Melbourne and across Victoria more broadly, the government has been forced to back down on a raft of controversial reforms,” Ms Credlin said. “Aimed at cutting out the use of domestic gas.”



The pond's main complaint is that the reptiles never give Jennie with bee in bonnet enough space in the hive mind, yet she seems to be a perfect fit ...

Large volumes, in excess of contract requirements, found their way on to international spot markets. Fuelled by this growth, production doubled on the east coast, while at home prices tripled, causing pain for households and manufacturing industry. The Ukraine war led to more uncontracted gas sold overseas at inflated prices. With domestic prices through the roof, the Albanese government was forced to apply a temporary gas price cap of $12GJ, well above the $7GJ recommended by the Institute of Energy Economics and Financial Analysis.
Structural gas shortages are predicted from 2028 as legacy fields in the Bass Strait decline. With alarm bells ringing, Viva Energy’s Geelong import terminal and Squadron Energy’s plant at Port Kembla are back on the agenda. Energy Users Association CEO Andrew Richards described the prospect of imported gas as a “significant failure of policy, planning and production. It is like importing sand into the Sahara!”.
Victoria’s proposal to authorise the Australian Energy Market Operator to contract LNG supplies is listed for the next meeting of energy ministers. At an estimated import cost of around $20GJ, taxpayers would again underwrite the policy failures of governments. As gas sets the price of electricity, these increased costs would be passed on in power bills.
Labor remains internally conflicted about gas, as witnessed in the response to the release of the Future Gas Strategy. The efforts of the Resources Minister and her use of existing levers in the Gas Market Code hasn’t led to a permanent reduction in the price of domestic gas, nor averted the threat of future shortages. Energy Minister Chris Bowen is on the record telling an international COP audience fossil fuels had no future in Australia, opposed gas as a transition fuel and excluded it from the Capacity Investment Scheme.

Any thoughts on how gassing the country might help gas the planet, what with it being a fossil fuel and all? Forget it Jake, have a couple of snaps, Resources Minister Madeleine King. Picture: Pema Tamang Pakhrin, Energy Minister Chris Bowen. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman



The pond kept getting whiffs of King Donald ...




Gee, thanks Jennie, and so to an urgent plea to find new and better ways to gas the country ...

By 2024, 25 per cent of our exported LNG was bound for the growing overseas spot market. The IEEFA estimates that the additional uncontracted gas exported from Queensland in 2023, was 150 per cent of the anticipated supply gap in 2030. Bowen seemed unaware of the extent of these uncontracted exports, when he deflected the argument about reservation to an issue of sovereign risk by breaking contracts.
The immediate solution to our gas supply shortage is not import terminals, nor breaking contracts, but using the power of government to divert uncontracted LNG exports into domestic markets. Levies and/or export controls should be used if negotiated outcomes are unsuccessful. This would finally decouple the domestic price from overseas spot prices. A mandated reservation scheme in future contract negotiations would reflect a social licence for the commercial use of our resources.
Gas is essential for the viability of manufacturing industry, now fallen to record lows. The saga of Snowy Hydro’s Kurri Kurri gas plant doesn’t augur well for the future. The plant was to compensate for Liddell’s closure back in April 2023, but it’s still not in operation. Labor appeased the virtue-signallers by promising the plant would start up on a 30 per cent gas and hydrogen mix, and be fully operational on hydrogen by 2030.
We now find the costs have blown out to at least $1.4bn for a quasi gas plant that’s 24km from the main gas trunkline and can only run on gas for a maximum 10 hours, before taking a day to refill. Forget any idea of a hydrogen plant by 2030, if ever. Recently the EPA intervened when the locals complained about diesel fumes in a recent test run. But the plan is to use diesel when gas is unavailable.
It’s time reality trumped the rhetoric. A Future Made in Australia will be nothing more than fine sentiment unless gas supply is assured for industry, households and our energy security. This can only be realised by a gas reservation scheme that prioritises our domestic energy needs.
Jennie George is a former ACTU president and former Labor member for Throsby.

Excellent stuff, and now for some viewing pleasures for kiddies eager to learn the reptile way, coming to you by way of an affiliate ...



Last but not least, and even allowing that some might have already seen it and many might not care, the pond actually learned a few things about Joe Rogan in this revealing filmic bio ...

The pitch:

Joe Rogan: The Path to Roganlightenment 
From his humble beginnings in Newark to his scrappy days in Boston, Joe Rogan has always pushed his brains to the limit. Rogan's stand-up comedy led him to a career in television, eventually inspiring him to start his own podcast where he could ask the really important questions, like, "Wouldn't it be crazy if a wolf wore a fedora?"

The view:




Saturday, August 02, 2025

In which nattering "Ned" and the Ughmann do climate science denialism all over again ...

 

The Zionist lobby were out in full force this weekend in the lizard Oz hive mind.

How to distract from the current disaster going down in Gaza? 

Why look, there, second from the top ...



First berate Jimbo and then drum up an EXCLUSIVE featuring persecution by the 'aim high' ABC ...

EXCLUSIVE
Jewish editor’s take on ABC bias
Elahn Zetlin was a Jewish employee at the ABC. But he says its coverage of the war in Gaza and a lack of support over anti-Semitism saw him walk away.
By Cameron Stewart

Then over on the extreme far right...



... throw in outrage at the suffering of a "national icon"

Making a national icon a symbol of anti-Semitism is a bridge way too far
The Palestine Action Group’s bid to march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge underscores the theme of the week: history, and the attempt to walk all over it.
By Julie Szego

... with the easy conflation of "protesting Gaza = anti-Semitism", and the job is done.

Meanwhile King Donald has fired the head of the Bureau of Labour Statistics for delivering a bad report, and he's roiled the markets with his tariff madness. 

But what does that count up against the reptiles delivering another EXCLUSIVE rant about Jimbo?

Even the rag where democracy died in a billionaire's purse - Jonathan Capehart is the latest to leave - the headlines take on a different hue ...



But the pond isn't able to look at any of that, because the reptiles are back in their familiar turf, navel gazing and fluff gathering about the joys of climate science denialism ...

Correction, in the case of nattering "Ned" it's a tedious ten minute climb through both siderisms and whataboutisms that manage to deflate and obscure any sense of the science and its implications. 

To achieve that goal, make it all a matter of politics ...



The header: Fasten your seat belts – the politics of climate are turning into a wild ride, Emissions policy has become a make or break issue for Labor and the Coalition.

The pond's suggestion? Fasten your seat belts, the planet is fully stuffed and yet the stuffing is going to get worse, so buckle up for a wild ride.

There was also a credit: Artwork: Frank Ling.

Oh Frank, really? Wouldn't it have been better to blame AI?

And let's not forget the mindless, meaningless mantra: This article contains features which are only available in the web version, Take me there

Now on with "Ned", falling between two stools while attempting to straddle Barners' - Tamworth's undying shame - notion of a middle ...

The curse of climate change politics and policy will haunt the Albanese government’s second term – typified by the mounting obstacles to Labor’s expanding renewables ambition while a divided Coalition is tempted to an irresistible battle over climate policy.
This week, Climate and Energy Minister Chris Bowen offered a blue skies vision. He predicted this term will likely see renewables pass coal “as our biggest source of electricity and then surpass 50 per cent of our energy”. Bowen reflected back to the dinosaur days, just 20 years ago, when Barnaby Joyce claimed it was technically impossible for the grid to accommodate 5 per cent renewables.
“The Australian people gave us a clear instruction on May 3,” Bowen said. “Keep going. Keep the investment going, keep the transition going. And that’s what we intend to do.
“It remains the case that to rebuild Australia’s energy grid into the modern, reliable, fairer system, we need to get renewables and storage online, faster.”
Bowen’s plan is “to supercharge our transition”. He announced a significant 25 per cent expansion in Labor’s Capacity Investment Scheme – the policy designed to drive private investment into clean energy by offering revenue guarantees. Gas is excluded from the scheme.
The extra eight gigawatt boost will underwrite 40GW of solar, wind and storage to 2030 with benefits to nearly five million households.
These decisions came when analysts warned that renewable investment on existing trends could not meet Labor’s long-championed targets: a 43 per cent emissions reduction level and an 82 per cent renewables target in our energy by 2030.
Bowen remains optimistic, saying Australia is “by and large on track” to meet the 43 per cent and is “confident” of the 82 per cent.

The pond isn't that interested in the nuts and bolts as by the way "Ned" always manages to introduce a sense of saucy fear and doubt into the discussion, helped by reptile distractions, Energy Minister Chris Bowen responded to questions surrounding the government's commitment to meet their renewable energy target of 82 per cent by 2030. “I can absolutely confirm it is this government's intention to continue to work toward that target in 2030… we are making very good progress toward it,” Mr Bowen said during Question Time on Thursday. “This is good news, at least we think it is. “All this leads to an addition to the renewable energy pipeline for our country. We think it’s a good thing, they think it’s a bad thing.”




The trick is to give weight to denialist loons of the Barners kind, and see his form of patented loonery as a challenge to climate and economic credibility ...

Labor’s climate and economic credibility is at stake. This is accentuated by its looming decisions on targets for 2035 where the advisory body, the Climate Change Authority, has previously floated targets in the 65-75 per cent zone, a hefty leap from the 43 per cent that Labor struggles to achieve. Immense political pressure seems to be forming around a 65-75 new-type flexible target.
Bowen told journalist Michelle Grattan the final CCA recommendation will be made public, so “if we haven’t accepted it” that will be transparent. He also warned any target must be achievable: “It’s all very well saying you want 80 or 90 per cent emissions reduction, well, you show me what levers you would pull to get that done.”
He said too high a target would damage economic productivity, a singular point.
That Anthony Albanese re-­appointed Bowen to the climate portfolio is revealing of the PM’s second-term priorities. While much of Labor’s agenda is mired in uncertainties, there is a guarantee – the government, its backers and the entire progressive movement wants a faster, higher, more urgent energy transformation. Renewables are a Labor faith.
But this challenge is something else – it is a massive experiment. Renewables are about building a new energy system, making it reliable along with huge transmission lines. This is one of the greatest economic experiments Labor has embarked upon in its history. It reveals Labor’s modern identity as a progressive party. But this provokes a question: is it still a genuine Labor Party? That means delivering an agenda that works in terms of prices, jobs, budgets and productivity for people, households and industry – not just honouring the climate science.

It also helps if you can bring in a Garnaut to garnish the offering, but not before a snap of the chief villain, That Anthony Albanese re-­appointed Chris Bowen to the climate portfolio is revealing of the PM’s second-term priorities.. Picture: NewsWire/Martin Ollman




"Ned" is grave and solemn when confronted by Garnaut ...

Grave doubts on this task were raised this week by an economic and climate guru, Professor Ross Garnaut, who repudiated the optimism of Albanese and Bowen.
Garnaut was a formative influence on Rudd/Gillard climate policies and is a strong advocate of Australia as a renewable energy superpower. Asked if there was any hope of Labor policy achieving its climate goals, Garnaut told Inquirer: “No, there’s not. We are heading for a climate and energy policy crisis within a few years. These goals can only be achieved with significant policy changes by the government.”

The reptiles even offered a snap, Ross Garnaut. Picture: Liam Kidston




And yet only yesterday the pond featured Killer of the IPA ravaging Garnaut ...

Hours later, climate change economics guru Ross Garnaut said the government would fall short of its existing emission and intermittent energy targets “by a big margin” – let alone the more ambitious targets Chris Bowen is poised to announce. I wouldn’t start stocking up on vitamin C.
The diminishing returns to hysteria and fearmongering isn’t the only problem facing the emissions reduction juggernaut. The rationale for replacing fossil fuels with wind and solar power are crumbling too, as Garnaut’s history of failed predictions and mistaken analyses makes clear.
Launching his 2019 book, Superpower, Garnaut declared he had “no doubt that intermittent renewables could meet 100 per cent of Australia’s electricity requirements by the 2030s, with high degrees of security and reliability, and at wholesale prices much lower than experienced in Australia over the past half dozen years”.
Six years later that’s become a fanciful scenario: wholesale electricity prices have roughly tripled from a decade ago, and reliability has tanked. Australian Energy Market Operator chief Daniel Westerman this week revealed the number of interventions to stave off blackouts had exploded from six in 2016 to 1800 last year.
“Since the summer of 2016-17, the Tesla big battery, other batteries, the government’s gas turbines, and more attentive regulatory agencies have made South Australia possibly the most secure region within the National Energy Market,” he said.
It’s a combination that has also given the state – which turned off its last coal power station in 2016 – the most expensive power in the country. In January SA sought to switch on two diesel generators as it scrambled to upgrade interconnector cables to NSW and Victoria to maintain grid stability.
Still, it’s especially puzzling that Professor Garnaut is still worshipped as some sort of energy policy oracle after championing the idea “green hydrogen” – the alleged underpinning of our future “renewable superpower” status – could be anything other than a trendy boondoggle borne of scientific illiteracy.

And so on, and\ yet here Garnaut is rehabilitated by "Ned", so that "Ned" can just ask questions, express concerns, confound the puzzled Killer even more by taking him as some sort of oracle ... or at least as a way to muddy the waters, introduce murk in the fog of the climate wars ...

When doing FUD, always seek out those who can produce saucy doubts ...

Yet there is virtually no prospect of such changes, as Bowen has made clear. Unsurprisingly, Bowen disagrees with Garnaut. But if Garnaut is right, the Albanese government is heading for a political and policy train wreck – with enormous consequences.
Garnaut is far from alone. While the Coalition disagrees with his solution – a bold carbon price – it agrees with his critique of Labor’s climate policy. On that score a conga line of industry leaders has warned Labor in the past week, with outgoing Rio Tinto boss, Jakob Stausholm, saying our energy prices are incompatible with local manufacturing; EnergyAustralia chief Mark Collette called for a single planning approach across all states to accelerate renewables investment; and Origin Energy CEO Frank Calabria said while big investments were under way, the risks lay in losing public support for the transition along with the rising impact on consumer bills.
The message overall is things are about to get harder.

That's passing true, it's going to get harder and harder to make it to the end, especially with all the interrupting snaps, EnergyAustralia chief Mark Collette. Picture: Jason Edwards, Origin CEO Frank Calabria. Picture: John Feder




It gets even better, as "Ned" yet again pretends that he's not in the land of right-wing populists ...

Garnaut’s judgment may prove more significant for the Coalition than for Labor. It plays directly into the agonising debate the divided Liberals and Nationals are having about whether to ditch their support for net zero at 2050, the policy taken to the past two elections under Scott Morrison and Peter Dutton.
The logic is simple. Indeed, it would seem irrefutable. If Garnaut is right and Labor is heading into climate convulsions, the Liberals have a golden opportunity – let it happen. Ensure Labor is held responsible for its policies.
It’s a tactical approach that says: don’t make yourself the issue, don’t think your job is to appease the populist right, don’t embrace the mad option of winding back the clock and ditching net zero.
That gifts Albanese his dream – making the Liberals the issue, running a scare campaign at which Labor excels. Imagine how powerful it would be: depicting the ­Coalition as regressing to become climate deniers. That’s exactly how it would be cast by Labor, the teals, the Greens and the progressive media.
Middle Australia is not asking for this reversal. Moreover, support for net zero had nothing to do with the Liberals almost being eliminated in urban Australia at the last election. Any problem was the opposite: not being seen to be credible on climate action. Net zero is a benchmark 25 years away. It’s the obsession of right-wing ­populists, but not the public.
The new Liberal leader, Sussan Ley, is a moderate who knows the party must retain credibility on climate policy. The task for the Liberals is to focus on Labor’s policies now, out to 2030 and 2035, given the multiple problems arising from system reliability, more price ­escalation, the construction task, threats to industry competitiveness, more government spending on subsidies and consumer price compensation, and a social licence crisis over wind farms.

Poor Sussssan, Sussan Ley is a moderate who knows the party must retain credibility on climate policy. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman




How does "Ned" help?

Why by making life hard for her by proposing Garnaut as a solution, only for "Ned" to immediately advise that his solution isn't actually a solution...

The near universal sentiment among Liberals is to savage Labor policy and prosecute its political accountability. The decisive question is: how should this be done?
For the Liberals, this decision is bigger than climate – it is about the their future identity and meaning as a party. Do they still aspire to be a governing party for all Australians or will they retreat to becoming an echo chamber for the populist right, pretending climate change is either a hoax or not a priority, posing as ideological heroes but turning their backs on Middle Australia? That is the road to extinction as a governing party.
Consider the campaigning reality. Who on earth in today’s Liberal Party could spearhead an anti-net zero campaign against the whole weight of progressive power? Ley would have no interest in such a role. In fact, there is ­nobody. It would require an even greater performance than Tony Abbott delivered as leader when he turned sentiment against carbon pricing and the Gillard government scheme. And Abbott is no longer in politics.
Running against net zero is a stance the Liberals would be utterly unable to prosecute with ­success.
The party should listen to Garnaut’s analysis in his speech to the Clean Energy Summit. He began by saying the renewable energy transition was “sick”.
Garnaut said: “Australia is currently on a trajectory to miss its renewable targets because of low investment and output in grid-scale solar and wind. Not by a little, but by a big margin. Progress on Australia becoming the world’s main exporter of zero-carbon energy-intensive goods is being blocked by renewable energy supply in the grid. There is now almost no new private grid-scale investment in solar and wind generation that is not underwritten by the CIS and by government through other mechanisms. We run the risk of spending a national budgetary fortune to buy failure.”
The Liberals won’t accept Garnaut’s solution – resort to a carbon price – and neither will Labor. But there is much in his analysis for the Coalition.
Every sign, reinforced by the global trend, is that this energy transition is getting far harder for Australia – despite the capital being amassed for investment.
Outside Bowen, who has the toughest job in the government? Try the Minister for Industry and Innovation, Tim Ayres, who faces multiple problems from uncompetitive metals smelters around Australia’s regions via a mix of high costs and China’s pricing tactics.

Cue another snap, Outside Chris Bowen, who has the toughest job in the government? Try the Minister for Industry and Innovation, Tim Ayres. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman




Remember the aim is FUD, so just keep on asking questions ...

This goes to copper, aluminium and lead and raises profound questions for Labor: what does its Future Made in Australia policy actually mean?
Patronising lectures to Australia about its so-called climate obligations are totally counter-productive, witness this week’s visit from UN climate change executive secretary Simon Stiell who said weak targets would damage our living standards. Warning that mega-droughts would make “fresh fruit and veg a once-a-year treat”, Stiell gets paid to say this stuff around the world. It doesn’t help.

Then comes the giveaway, the thing that undoes all "Ned's" feeble attempt at "balance":

The populist right has every justification for mocking the self-serving hysteria from professional climate advocates. 

Well no, there's no taint in being a professional scientist, nor in being a professional observer of the science, and if that leads to advocacy, why should it be tarnished with the verbiage of "self-serving hysteria"?

"Ned" realises this is going a tad far, so he tries a billy goat butt for balance ...

Yet the populist right is no slouch at fabricating its own fantasies – that China isn’t serious about renewables, that because emission reduction targets are tough they should be abandoned, even that the entire project of promoting renewables over fossil fuels is a flawed endeavour.

And then the true sign of a verbal fraud practising verbal gymnastics? Introduce talk of "the reality" ... (not the reality of climate science and its current findings) ...

The reality is that Australian government financing of new coal-fired stations won’t happen and that recycling the policy of public ownership of new nuclear plants – rejected at the last election – isn’t worth a re-run in those terms.
Liberal frontbencher Dan Tehan heads the net zero review across the Coalition parties, a daunting endeavour given strong Nationals sentiment against net zero and Ley’s desire to have a united Coalition position.

And so to the real purpose of "Ned's" mission. Bring in the loons...

Barnaby Joyce has read the mood of the Nationals’ constituency and promotes his bill to eliminate the net zero commitment. But this achieves nothing, only making Tehan’s job more difficult.

There's even a snap, Barnaby Joyce. Picture: NewsWire/Martin Ollman




Why is the pond always reminded of the infallible Pope?




Has Barners really read the mood of the Nationals constituency? 

Sure there are a lot of Nimbys doing the rounds when it comes to renewables, but the farmers the pond has talked to understand that climate science explains a lot, and that adaptation is necessary... and not in the future, but now.

"Ned" is mainly interested in the larrikins and the ratbags and the price loons because of the wild ride that will excite the lizard Oz hive mind ...

Obviously, the Liberals cannot afford any perception the Nationals are dictating the Coalition’s climate policy. That would be the ultimate folly. The solution surely lies in avoiding a binary approach. That means starting with a new framing of the goal, perhaps along the lines: “An Australian Way to Achieve Net Zero.”
But fasten your seat belts. The politics of climate are turning into a mad, wild ride.
Consider the extremes: Greens leader Larissa Waters calls for net zero to be achieved at 2035 with bans on new coal and gas mines – typical of gesture politics from the Greens with complete disregard of the damage being done.
At the other end of extremism, One Nation leader Pauline Hanson moved in the Senate this week that as a matter of “urgency” net zero be scrapped as an emissions target. She warned Australia faced a dismal future where the rich would be “controlling the plebs” and people would be told “what they eat, where they move, what cars they drive and how far they go” – basic freedoms would be extinguished. This is the coming populism on steroids.
In a deluded but ominous claim, Hanson compared herself with the leader of Reform UK, Nigel Farage, who has eaten into both Labour and Tory votes in Britain. Signalling she will recruit rejection of net zero as a One Nation cause, Hanson is already targeting the centrism of Sussan Ley.
“If she (Ley) wants to move further to the centre, to the left, to appease those moderates in the party, I’m quite happy to scoop up those votes,” Hanson said. “Everything that Nigel Farage stands for, I’ve been talking about for years.”

And once he's enjoyed the ride? An attempt at tamping down, a hint of moderation ...

Here’s a big message: the Coalition risks a voting fracture on the right over net zero. The most recent Newspoll had Hanson’s primary vote at 8 per cent – even higher than her election result – with the Coalition on 29 per cent. Labor won’t worry about the Greens, knowing it will command 85-plus per cent of their preferences. But that doesn’t happen with Hanson’s vote: the more it rises, the weaker the Coalition becomes.
Here is the daunting task for Tehan and the Liberals: it is neither a political nor policy option for the Liberals to abandon net zero at 2050 – yet the party needs a branding and a formula that is cognisant of the risk of voter fragmentation on the right.
The Liberals need to keep the public’s focus on the cost of Labor’s agenda. But they should be fully aware of the paradox of climate politics in Australia, as revealed again in a SECNewgate Energy Edition. The survey showed a majority “see the energy transition as positive and want it to go faster”, despite energy costs being the biggest concern. Some 60 per cent of people felt positive about the move to renewables, with 55 per cent saying the transition was too slow against only 17 per cent saying it was too fast.
Albanese and Bowen have a foundation on which to build; the Coalition should heed the warning – it needs to be prudent and avoid grand gestures that won’t fly with Middle Australia.

The pond was reminded of this in Crikey (sorry, paywall)... with the knowledge that whatever "Ned" says, this is what will drive the lizard Oz onwards ...



That's where both siderism gets you ... with the loudest loon cries the ones that are heard, fudging and distorting and misreading and misrepresenting ...

On the other hand, the Ughmann is never up for anything but blather with an Xian theological egde, as you might expect from an unreformed former seminarian.

That way the Ughmann reduces science to talk of the "faithful", and the result is even more unendurable, at a bare 6 minutes, than keeping "Ned" company for his ten minute ramble...



The header: Dilemma for Coalition as economic reality bites the net-zero faithful, The Coalition is trapped between physics, economics and geopolitics, which expose the net zero by 2050 target as a fantasy, and the iron law of political numbers, which shows abandoning this empty pledge risks electoral damnation.

The caption: National Party MPs and senators, including Matt Canavan and Barnaby Joyce, have been vocal above the Coalition’s net-zero target. Picture: Martin Ollman

The endless mantra: This article contains features which are only available in the web version, Take me there

The pond has been here many times before with the Ughmann, and no doubt will be here again in the future, and the best that can be said, in a Freudian way, is that the poor thing is always in the grip of projection, which is why he attributes to others the quality of "faithful", as he pursues his own version of the faith in a faithful way ...

Here’s a wicked political dilemma: When faced with the choice, do you tell a hard truth and risk losing votes, or mouth a popular mantra and lose your soul?
The Coalition now finds itself trapped between physics, economics and geopolitics, which expose the net zero by 2050 target as a fantasy, and the iron law of political numbers, which shows abandoning this empty pledge risks electoral damnation. Mishandle this moment and things could get worse, particularly for the Liberals.
So, once again, the remnant opposition finds itself headlining the energy debate, while the real story is that the Albanese government’s energy transition is falling apart. The government will not meet its 2030 targets, and trying to hit them will waste billions, weaken our electricity grid, destroy businesses and beggar the already poor. Benefits, such as grants for batteries and rooftop solar, will flow to the rich. Despite this, some time soon, even less credible targets will be set as the government rebrands a fool’s errand as progress. To argue net zero cannot and will not be achieved is not to deny climate change, but it does defy a powerful orthodoxy. And history has not been kind to heretics.
But how do you ignore glaring, inconvenient facts? After more than a quarter of a century of global pledges to cut fossil fuel use, last year the world burned more coal, oil and gas than in any other year in human history. Global carbon emissions rose again, as they do every year there isn’t a financial crash or a pandemic. Trillions have been spent, trillions more will be demanded, and the one metric that matters keeps pointing to abject failure. That’s not an opinion. That’s the record. To say nations are not serious about net zero is not a conservative talking point, it simply describes the world as it is, not as we wish it to be.

As always in these exercises, the notorious war criminal and man in grip of greed for oil and gas money is enjoined in the cause, Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair called out climate policies as “unrealistic and therefore unworkable”. Picture: AFP




Called out? So at first glance it seems ...

Former British Labour prime minister Tony Blair was accused of heresy when he called out climate policies as “unrealistic and therefore unworkable”.
“Too often, political leaders fear saying what many know to be true: the current approach isn’t working,” Blair wrote in the foreword to a paper from his institute calling for a reset in climate policy.

Why is it that the servile lickspittle's retreat is never mentioned? 

It's easy enough to find, as in The Independent ...



Dear sweet long absent lord how that war criminal's face immediately causes the pond to retch ...

Okay, so he's a fair weather friend, fickle and veering as the need and the wind takes him ... and if he's an argument, bring on the next needless war.

Now here's where the Ughmann really shows his cloth (you might throw in a dog collar just for fun)...

Dr Varun Sivaram, an American physicist who was managing director for clean-energy innovation in the Biden-Kerry climate team, has described the global target of net-zero emissions by 2050 as “utterly implausible”. He now heads the Council on Foreign Relations’ Climate Realism Initiative.
Both men believe burning fossil fuels is driving climate change. Both also recognise target-driven policy has failed, because the world’s energy systems are run on the rules of physics, not politics.
But facts don’t matter, because the climate change debate runs on faith, not reason. Net zero is now a central part of the liturgy, a climate communion wafer transubstantiated into salvation through a process no one can explain. Recite the climate creed and anything you say after that, no matter how mad, will be met with cries of amen.

That blather about transubstantiation would once have caused the pond to utter an oath, but perhaps that would upset the Google bot.

The pond will settle for "projection", and pause to wonder if the delusional Ughmann still thinks he's eating human flesh and swallowing human blood on a Sunday? 

Has he ever wondered about the science of that, or why coeliacs are cast into eternal hell and damnation because the wafers contain gluten?

Never mind, enough with such scientific questions, cue a snap of Twiggy, Dr Andrew Forrest has warned “the propagation of oil and gas is hurting every person on this planet”. Picture: Martin Ollman




Apart from giving the pond a chance to joke about Catholicism and have Fellini-esque memories of nuns, what else?

Well there's the usual assembly of useless data, and never mind the cost of what climate change is doing, and will do, to the planet ...

This week, Australian billionaire iron ore magnate and green energy evangelist Andrew Forrest declared in these pages: “The propagation of oil and gas is hurting every person on this planet.”
Except that coal, oil and gas delivered a civilisational leap in human prosperity. For nearly two millennia, global economic growth was glacial. According to economic historian Angus Maddison, world GDP in the year 1AD was about $182bn (in 1990 international dollars). By 1800, it had risen to $695bn, a fourfold increase over 1800 years. Then came coal, which fuelled the Industrial Revolution. Between 1800 and 1900, world GDP nearly tripled to $1.9 trillion. In the 20th century, oil and gas supercharged the transformation, with GDP surging to $41 trillion, a 21-fold rise in just 100 years.
Rich nations are energy rich. Your standard of living is directly linked to the amount of heat you get to waste, whether you see it or not. The average Australian has around 63,000 kilowatt-hours of energy at their disposal each year.
In the 20th century, life expectancy in Australia rose from about 55 to 77 for men, and 59 to 82 for women, because wealth improves health. But the role of oil and gas in human wellbeing runs deeper still. These fuels provide the petrochemical building blocks used to make almost all of our essential drugs.

Desperate stuff, and so it's time to introduce a handy straw dog, one who got the hive mind into an uproar this week, UN climate chief Simon Stiell argues that fruit and vegetables could become a once-a-year treat.




Really reptiles? That's the best you could do by way of illustration?

Never mind, it sent the Ughmann off ... and yes, there was yet more talk of divine intervention, great theologians and God's will ...

Here let’s bring in UN climate chief Simon Stiell, who, true to his agency’s hysterical form, wound the dial to catastrophe this week as he warned that without stronger climate action, fruit and vegetables could become a once-a-year treat. It is interesting to note that the data behind this dire fortune-telling does not come from the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports, which do not forecast megadroughts or food scarcity for Australia. Stiell mixed the most extreme scenarios he could muster into a B-grade schlock-horror script designed to terrify the kiddies into submission. And the evidence shows fossil fuels don’t starve the planet, they feed it.
Global food production exploded in the 20th century, driven by a surge in yields. Between 1960 and 1997, cropland increased by less than 10 per cent, yet food production nearly tripled thanks to synthetic fertilisers, mechanised farming and oil-powered transport. At the core of the Green Revolution was the Haber-Bosch process, which uses natural gas to pull nitrogen from the atmosphere to make fertiliser. Without gas, half the world’s population would starve.
Before moving on, it’s worth noting Forrest’s condemnation of gas jars with the fact he owns Squadron Energy, the company building a liquefied natural gas import terminal in NSW. The unkind, but not unreasonable, might call this rank hypocrisy. This column will simply observe that the Lord works in mysterious ways His wonders to perform.
When it comes to divine intervention, the Coalition could use some. One of Australia’s greatest theologians once wisely observed that God’s will is what you make it, so the first step might be to stop making yourself the target. Why not declare a 12-month truce on fighting with each other over targets and direct all that energy outward by spending every waking moment pointing to the high cost, multiple failures and profound risks of the system under construction? Nail down the numbers on every subsidy, expose the massive green grift, point to the deeds of the rest of the world. Pray that the government gets its wish of having tens of thousands descend on Adelaide in 2026 for the global UN climate jamboree and highlight the rank hypocrisy of the most carbon-intensive show on Earth.

At this point it's important to throw in a "process" in order to sound science wise, The Haber-Bosch process, which uses natural gas to pull nitrogen from the atmosphere to make fertiliser, has been at the core of the Green Revolution.



Really reptiles? That's the best you could do by way of illustration? Though to be fair, that does evoke the depth of the Ughmann's insights ... the sort of snap you might expect in Country Life...

And so to a final scheming for the stuffing of the planet...

Abandoning net zero might well be the goal, but in order to win a war you need to raise an army, and the population is a long way from being recruited to that cause. But the same polls that show a majority wanting action on climate change also show that people aren’t prepared to pay a high price for it, particularly when advocates promised them it would be cheap. If people start making the connection between soaring power bills and the true cost of overbuilding a grid with weather-dependent generation, their view on the transition will sour.
Educate the public. Most people have no idea where their power, food or wealth comes from, and they need to make the connection between their lifestyle and what fuels it. Champion getting new gas projects going in NSW and Victoria, which the Greens, the teals and most of Labor will find hard to do because their base has been conditioned to hating all fossil fuel. Champion carbon capture and storage. And stay the course on nuclear energy, which the rest of the world is embracing. The argument should simply be “lift the ban, have the debate”.
Read the reports of the IPCC and point to the large gaps between what they say about climate change and extreme weather and how they are portrayed by politicians. Climate change is a problem, but it is not an existential threat. Net zero is a slogan, not a solution. If the world is not acting in unison, then nothing Australia does will make a jot’s worth of difference. We can spend trillions on abatement and then have to spend trillions on adaptation. What sense is there in that? Australia needs to stay wealthy and spend its limited resources where they can do most good. With enough work, what sounds like heresy today may one day look like wisdom.

Say what? Climate change is a problem? 

Who'd have guessed? 

Shouldn't we just hunker down, say a few prayers, eat a little human flesh, drink a little human blood, and wait for the rapture?

And now to close by celebrating freedumb, the freedumb to endure "Ned" and the Ughmann and gaily laugh as we wander down the road to extinction ...




Friday, August 01, 2025

In which Killer of the IPA and our Henry strut their Friday stuff ...

 

Another dreary and entirely predictable day at the climate denialist lizard Oz, with the reptiles leading off with an ad hominem attack, in the form of an EXCLUSIVE ...

EXCLUSIVE
Public pashes and private jet dashes: Cannon-Brookes embraces high-flyer way of life
Mike Cannon-Brookes paints himself as a climate crusader. The use of his private jet tells a different story with the Bombardier 7500 ferrying the Atlassian billionaire and his girlfriend around the globe.
By Liam Mendes, John Stensholt and Perry William
s

Don't get the pond wrong, it's all in favour of "kill the rich" memes, and so the pond looks forward to a denunciation of the travel arrangements of the Emeritus Chairman and his brood. 

Meanwhile, here's to a rag - which the pond believes and understands, never having actually seen a copy in recent times - still kills trees for no apparent reason ...




Down below, at the very bottom, the pond noted that the reptiles were resentful of the greenies (for the umpteenth time), while over on the extreme far right our Henry, if flickering in neon ever so briefly, was top of the world ma ...




With the theme being climate, the pond thought it right to take Killer of the IPA off the leash and give him the first go, a trot, a run, a chance to strut his denialist stuff.

One thing's certain. Killer loathes climate science cultists almost as much as he fears and loathes masks ...




The header: Dud climate predictions are no worries for Ross Garnaut, It’s puzzling that Ross Garnaut is still worshipped as some sort of energy policy oracle, especially after championing the idea ‘green hydrogen’.

The caption: Ross Garnaut addresses the National Press Club on “Realising Australia's economic and climate opportunities” in Canberra. Picture: Martin Ollman

The magickal invitation: This article contains features which are only available in the web version,Take me there

As is the vogue in climate science denialist circles, Killer began with a litany of all the predictions that had offended him in the past, the markers that might be used to signal the demise of the climate science religion.

Sadly the pond must mark him down, because there's not a single invoking of the Dorothea Mackeller poem to which all climate change-denying cultists must swear allegiance...

In 2004 The Guardian catastrophised that Britain faced a “Siberian climate” by 2020. In 2008, former US vice-president Al Gore said the Arctic could be entirely ice-free within five years. In 2014 French foreign minister Laurent Fabius said the world had “500 days before climate chaos”. And two years ago the UN secretary-general declared that the “era of global boiling (had) arrived.”
Unless Australia slashed its 1.1 per cent contribution to greenhouse gas emissions, fruit and vegetables would become a “once-a-year treat”, according to UN climate tsar Simon Stiell, who delivered this warning in Sydney on Monday.
Hours later, climate change economics guru Ross Garnaut said the government would fall short of its existing emission and intermittent energy targets “by a big margin” – let alone the more ambitious targets Chris Bowen is poised to announce. I wouldn’t start stocking up on vitamin C.
The diminishing returns to hysteria and fearmongering isn’t the only problem facing the emissions reduction juggernaut. The rationale for replacing fossil fuels with wind and solar power are crumbling too, as Garnaut’s history of failed predictions and mistaken analyses makes clear.

Inevitably the reptiles introduced a Sky Noise moment down under and never mind that nattering "Ned" had notoriously labelled both Sky after dark and the IPA as tempting and damaging distractions, Australia is well placed to move towards a 100 per cent renewable energy future, according to prominent economist Professor Ross Garnaut. Professor Garnaut said Australia can achieve this aim by the end of the 2030s due to its strong renewable energy base. He told Sky News Australia must move "to a zero-emission economy before 2050" if the government plans to meet its Paris Agreement targets. "The recommendations I make are fully consistent with government policy," he said. "We can make a good start (to achieving zero emissions) within the current policy framework".




Killer was on a climate cult assault roll ...

Launching his 2019 book, Superpower, Garnaut declared he had “no doubt that intermittent renewables could meet 100 per cent of Australia’s electricity requirements by the 2030s, with high degrees of security and reliability, and at wholesale prices much lower than experienced in Australia over the past half dozen years”.
Six years later that’s become a fanciful scenario: wholesale electricity prices have roughly tripled from a decade ago, and reliability has tanked. Australian Energy Market Operator chief Daniel Westerman this week revealed the number of interventions to stave off blackouts had exploded from six in 2016 to 1800 last year.
“Since the summer of 2016-17, the Tesla big battery, other batteries, the government’s gas turbines, and more attentive regulatory agencies have made South Australia possibly the most secure region within the National Energy Market,” he said.
It’s a combination that has also given the state – which turned off its last coal power station in 2016 – the most expensive power in the country. In January SA sought to switch on two diesel generators as it scrambled to upgrade interconnector cables to NSW and Victoria to maintain grid stability.
Still, it’s especially puzzling that Professor Garnaut is still worshipped as some sort of energy policy oracle after championing the idea “green hydrogen” – the alleged underpinning of our future “renewable superpower” status – could be anything other than a trendy boondoggle borne of scientific illiteracy.
The electrolysis process that is used to produce it chews up vastly more energy than what remains in the “green hydrogen” thus produced. No wonder 99 per cent of $100bn worth of “green hydrogen” projects have failed to progress in Australia, according to Rystad Energy, practically all of which have received some form government support.

Cue a snap, Daniel Westerman




The pond long ago gave up arguing with reptiles of the Killer kind, but correspondents might feel inclined to take the "nuke the country to save the planet" bait ...

Of the half-dozen “coloured” types of hydrogen identified by the CSIRO, Garnaut should be backing “pink”, if any. That’s not, as you might have thought, hydrogen produced by an LGBTI workforce but rather by nuclear energy, which Garnaut must know Australia needs to develop should it have any serious shot at meeting long-term emissions reductions targets. Speaking in 2011, Garnaut said Australia’s lack of action was “exercis(ing) a veto over effective global mitigation”, while lauding China for its supposed determination to reduce emissions.

At this point Killer came up with a very familiar relativist argument, and to prejudice the read, the pond thought Wilcox caught the notion nicely...




On the keyless Killer ranted from his IPA cell ...

The rest of the world appears to have taken little notice of our efforts since. According to the publicly available Climate Action Tracker, which “tracks government climate action and measures it against the globally agreed Paris Agreement”, practically every country in the world is falling short of its Paris emissions goals.
The efforts of India and China, home to more than 40 per cent of the world’s population, are rated “highly insufficient”, which isn’t surprising given their voracious appetite for Australian coal.
China pays lip service to emissions reductions targets, and is spending significant sums on intermittent power, but it also has a massive geopolitical interest in convincing the rest of the world to rely more on solar energy, the component supply chain for which it dominates. The CCP plays a long game.
Hardly any of the world is taking emissions reduction seriously, except for Australia, Europe and Britain, well below 30 per cent of global GDP. Recall Russia, a massive fossil fuel exporter that would probably benefit from global warming, has signed up to the Paris agreement. Carbon dioxide emissions continue to rise every year, even before Africa’s and India’s economic development begins to accelerate.

Yet another Sky Noise moment down under and never mind that nattering "Ned" had notoriously labelled both Sky after dark and the IPA as tempting and damaging distractions? Sure thing, and even better it features Killer himself, IPA Chief Economist Adam Creighton discusses the latest inflation data as Labor remains pleased with itself over recent numbers. “Look, I understand the politics of it, two-thirds of Australians are generally happy when interest rates go down,” Mr Creighton told Sky News host Danica De Giogio. “But we should think of the one-third who should not be happy about it, and like I said inflation is not low, I mean, three per cent is not low.”




Never underestimate the benefit of a screen cap when offered a talking Killer moment.

Naturally Killer was in awe of King Donald's and his servile minions' denialism ...

“We will not allow a windmill to be built in the United States,” Donald Trump told reporters in Britain this week, signalling the US is no longer remotely part of the net zero club either. In July congress rescinded hundreds of billions of dollars worth of Biden-era solar and wind subsidies, while Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency this week said it would no longer classify carbon dioxide as a pollutant.
“This has been referred to as basically driving a dagger into the heart of the climate change religion,” Commissioner Lee Zeldin said.

On the upside, that reminded the pond of the new Luckovich ...




Now there's denialism in action, and way better than the deals that he's managed with tariffs ...




Killer then wrapped up climate denialist IPA proceedings for the day ...

In his speech this week Garnaut praised as “herculean” the Albanese government’s efforts to reduce emissions. Indeed, Canberra has more than trebled the budget cost of promoting intermittent energy, legislated a de facto emissions trading scheme via the Safeguard Mechanism (which will cost Australian industry even more than Trump tariffs) and begun to nationalise household electricity bills. If “herculean” is not enough, perhaps the targets themselves are unattainable?
Unfortunately, Chris Bowen is likely to double down on ever more ambitious targets, which remain superficially popular among a voting public that is clueless about the economic and technological realities. A major blackout or further, large unanticipated increases in power prices in coming years could easily be blamed on the net zero crowd.
Adam Creighton is chief economist at the Institute of Public Affairs.

Excellent stuff and a worthy starter for the main course of our Henry, and here the pond felt the need to dim the lights and set the mood...




So to a man who has in recent times tended to sound like a Roman tackling the problem of Carthage, what with the necessity to flatten the place to improve the view, and perhaps, who knows, turn Gaza into a new Riviera ...




The header:  In rush to vilify Israel, Sudan’s crisis goes MIA, Who could reasonably deny that a relentless focus on Israel, and on its responsibility alone, has added unstoppable momentum to the current wave of anti-Semitism?

The caption: The photograph from Gaza (left) showing emaciated toddler Muhammad Zakariya Ayyoub al-Matouq. The New York Times admitted an error in publishing the image after it emerged the child had been diagnosed with pre-existing health conditions. In Sudan, right, Robaika Peter, 25, holds her severely malnourished child at the paediatric ward of the Mother of Mercy Hospital in Sudan on June 25, 2024. Pictures: Ahmed Jihad Ibrahim Al-arini/Anadolu via Getty Images / Thomas Mukoya, Reuters

The pond hadn't imagined our Henry was inclined to moral relativism, more commonly known as "Whataboutism" ... but just to start the conversation, the pond noticed this graph in Axios, constructed from actual Israeli government sources ...




Pshaw, just like the 300 Spartans, our Henry could do without food or other aid between early March and the middle of May in a doddle, perhaps a canter, certainly never breaking into a sweat ...

Now on with the "whataboutism" ...

On the very same day the ABC reported a UN statement calling Gaza the “hungriest place on Earth”, the World Food Program, which is the UN agency with central responsibility for preventing famines, warned that the situation in Sudan was veering into the “world’s largest hunger crisis in recent history”.
At that time, in late May, 25 million people in Sudan were “acutely food insecure”, while 650,000 – “the highest anywhere in the world” – suffered from “catastrophic levels of hunger”. Since then, conditions have worsened, with the incidence of “catastrophic levels of hunger” increasing by some 10 per cent.

It's not as if the pond is in the business of defending the "aim high" ABC, but it's ironic that they should label it as a "forgotten crisis" ...




And so on, and the ABC even has a tag, and those inclined to misery porn can have a listen or a view ...

In the pond's view, using contending disasters as a way of downgrading the current Gaza genocide is disingenuous at best and shameful at worst...

The disaster’s immediate cause is a struggle between forces mainly backed by Egypt and a rebel group backed mainly by the UAE. But plunging that struggle into unrestrained savagery is the determination of Sudan’s Arabs to exterminate the country’s Masalit minority, who have been expelled from their homelands and herded into refugee camps.
Neither of the warring sides has shown any regard for civilians. Tens of thousands of children have died of starvation since the beginning of the year, as combatants pillage aid and prevent its delivery. Adding to the horror, there is irrefutable evidence of children as young as one being sexually abused before being slaughtered.
Following the release of that evidence, Benny Morris, the “revisionist” historian Israel’s critics love to cite (when it suits them), has described rape as an integral part of “the Arab way of war”.
The reality, he goes on to say, is that the atrocities in Sudan “tell us something many in the West don’t want to hear about the behavioural norms of Arab combatants in wartime”.
One thing is certain: they won’t hear about them on the ABC, which has consistently ignored the rapidly deteriorating situation in Sudan.
The figures are stark: a search of material added to the ABC website in the last month does not find a single hit for “Sudan” and just one for “Darfur”. But it does find 5750 hits for “Gaza” and 3380 for “famine and Gaza”.
Why then, despite claims that “all lives matter”, are some tragedies so much worthier of our attention and compassion than others, whose sheer scale is vastly greater?
It is, of course, true that our resources of attention and compassion are limited. David Hume was right when he wrote, centuries ago, that “We sympathise more with persons contiguous to us, than with persons remote from us: with our acquaintance, than with strangers: with our countrymen, than with foreigners” – and many more Australians have connections to the Middle East than to Sudan.

Sadly that reference to Hume is about as good as it gets this day for our Henry's arcane references, designed to bolster his pompous pontifications.

At this point, cue a snap designed to elevate one disaster at the expense of another, Asha Kano Kavi, an internally displaced woman from Kadugli, serves wild boiled leaves for food to orphaned children at the Bruam IDP Camp within the Sudan's People Liberation Movement-North (SPLM-N) controlled area in Sudan in June, 2024. Picture: Reuters




Might not our Henry and the lizard Oz chew gum and and walk and talk and rub tummy and contemplate both disasters with an equal amount of lack of equanimity?

Not really, because it seems that the point of dwelling on  the ongoing Sudan disaster is simply to mitigate, downplay and otherwise diminish the ongoing Gaza disaster.

But while that factor and others are at work, the unmitigated focus on Gaza is scarcely neutral. To begin with, by hiding the facts “many in the West don’t want to hear about the behavioural norms of Arab combatants in wartime” it obscures a central element of the conflict’s ongoing context.
Even more importantly, the focus on Gaza is accompanied by a singular emphasis on Israel, which the ABC mentions some 10 times more frequently than Hamas – an imbalance equally apparent in statements by government ministers, whose ritualistic references to Hamas (such as its calls to voluntarily disarm) are entirely disconnected from reality.

Now our Henry does come up with one of those classic billy goat butts, for what he is rightly famous ...

Israel’s conduct cannot and should not be exempt from even searing criticism. But constantly repeated, the imbalance in emphasis absolves Hamas of its responsibilities, encouraging a simplistic, one-sided narrative in which Israel is the sole actor.

Truly, a splendid billy goat butt, and all in the cause of downplaying the current government of Israel's role in the ongoing Gaza disaster ...

The result is to fuel a dynamic of demonisation whose characteristics have been extensively analysed since the work done by Lewis Coser, an eminent American sociologist who was a refugee from Nazism, in the early 1950s.
Thus, an unrelenting focus on a single party – in this case, Israel – makes it the lightning rod of attention and of the attribution of moral responsibility. As that happens, a symbolic moral boundary is drawn between the active “transgressor” and its allegedly passive “victims”, crystallising a distinction between virtue and vice. Finally, by framing the “transgressors” as evil, the newly drawn moral boundary places the “transgressors” outside the public’s “span of sympathy”, fracturing social bonds, preventing rational discussion and shredding any obligations of civility.
But more than just drawing moral boundaries is needed to convert condemnation into escalating confrontation.

You see? And yet if our Henry was serious he might at least have mentioned King Donald and his love of deporting folk to south Sudan, while at the same time gutting USAID.


And so on, as the reptiles offered ...South Sudan faces worsening hunger as global aid slows — UN resorts to air-drops to reach families in conflict-hit Upper Nile.




Our Henry carried on with the downplaying ...

Rather, mobilisers, intent on furthering the demonisation, must transform condemnation into outrage by using “scripts” that heighten the perception of evil – a process exemplified in the literature by the New Left’s equating of the US’s conduct in Vietnam with that of Nazi Germany.

Oh dear, that reminded the pond of this story in Haaretz, archive link:




The pond doesn't accuse our Henry of being vile, though a close reading of that text might suggest he is...

The real point of his disingenuous, insulting exercise was never to contemplate the terrible events in Sudan, causes and possible solutions .... it was to distract from the current genocidal inclined government of Israel ...

As the outrage those scripts provoke foment mass protests, repeatedly participating in public displays of hatred cements the commitment of the weakly involved and incites hardcore activists to push the boundaries ever further.
Even worse, those displays of hatred normalise violence against the out-group, who – precisely because they are singled out for attack – are increasingly viewed by bystanders as “not quite like us” and hence not “meriting the sympathy we would extend to ‘our kind’ ”.
Meanwhile, with the lunacy of the fringe entering the mainstream, anyone even indirectly related to the out-group “becomes viewed as polluted” unless they can prove their innocence by denouncing their former friends and associates. As they are anathemised, they lose the right to hold their own opinions and to the equal and effective protection of the laws.
Coser, writing late in life, feared that the changes in communications technology that were creating a “global village” would bring more, and more rapid, demonisation rather than less.
As we were bombarded by images of dreadful events, he argued, the demonisers’ ready scripts would allow us to escape the burden of coping with moral complexity. Moreover, with everything occurring in full public gaze, the pressures to conform would increase, raising the cost of refusing to join the baying pack. Large conurbations favour anonymity; as history grimly shows, it takes a village to burn a witch – and no village mobilises witch hunters more venomous than the online village in which we live.
Little wonder that process has unfolded time and again in recent years. But its current reach and ferocity are truly unprecedented. That is largely because the “villain” takes more tangible form than in previous episodes: radical environmentalists may despise “climate deniers” but there are not well-defined, readily identifiable, communities of “climate deniers” for them to attack. Now the haters have a target: the Jews.

Actually, if the pond might resort to another Haaretz story, it's more about Benji's mob ... archive link




Just as our Henry might have expended some energy analysing what had contributed to and compounded the current disaster in Sudan, he might also have spent some energy analysing the assorted steps - all designed to ensure Benji's political survival - which have led to the current Gaza disaster.

The pond can only quote a few examples from Amir Tibon's piece. 

This will have to do, but the link is there for those who care to look at alternative realities...




And so on and all our Henry can offer in his furious fulminations is the old saw, the old trope, that criticising the current behaviour of the current genocidal Israeli government must be a form of blatant anti-Semitism ...

The transposition is hardly accidental. Not only is there a natural link between Israel and Australia’s Jewish community; the demonisation of Israel rekindles ancient prejudices in some and unleashes the deeply ingrained hatreds of others. As all the vices anti-Semites have always associated with Jews – vindictiveness, arrogance, demonic power and global reach – are heaped on to Israel, “Israel” has become little more than a signifier for “Jew”.
When, after attacks on synagogues, restaurants and individuals, the National Gallery of Victoria is targeted, in torrents of punitive hysteria, because the Gandel family, which is Jewish, has generously endowed it, who can possibly deny that the vilest forms of anti-Semitism are at work?
And who could reasonably deny that a relentless focus on Israel, and on its responsibility alone, has added unstoppable momentum to the hostility and encouraged the unabashed expression of blatant anti-Semitism?
An ugly abyss has opened up. It is, in the end, not only the Jews it will swallow. It is our moral bearings and, with them, our way of life.

And the reptiles keep on charging others for their hysteria, and yet, what to make of that level of Henry hysteria.

It is our moral bearings and, with them, our way of life.

Personally speaking, the pond's way of life bears little resemblance to a Palestinian being starved to death as a method of war.

But if Benji's mob wanted a full-throated apologist in a state of hysterical uproar, how lucky they were to have landed on our Henry. Lord Haw-Haw couldn't have done it better, and tough luck Sudan, it was never really about you ...

What a relief it is to look away, and instead have fun with the fire ant-riddled infallible Pope ....