A prisoner in Nigeria?
If the pond has one complaint with the reptiles, they lack imagination and never go far enough. Surely the loss of freedom should have reminded Judy of her time in a Nazi death camp, or the time she was forced to wear a yellow star?
Here the pond always looks to the United States for loonery nonpareil. Take this effort reported by the Daily Beast involving the efforts of a state legislator by name Ken Weyler...
...Sununu’s statement referring to “absurd emails” from the chair of the finance committee—which recently voted to table $27 million in federal vaccine aid for the state—come after Weyler blasted colleagues’ inboxes with materials on Monday rife with COVID conspiracy theories, including a document entitled “The Vaccine Death Report” that claimed vaccine injections were “murdering millions of people.”
The email from the legislator contained a 52-page “report” with disinformation on COVID-19, including claims that “unknown, octopus-like creatures are being injected into millions of children worldwide.”
The report also made claims that 5G technology had somehow been inserted into the vaccine to control people’s thoughts and called the pope and others “at the top” of the Roman Catholic Church “satanists” and “luciferans” for backing public health measures. The report additionally made the wild suggestion that the babies of vaccinated parents in Mexico were “transhuman”—born with “pitch-black eyes” and undergoing accelerated aging.
“It’s all one huge puppet theatre, where the majority of the people—even most of those who are complicit —haven’t got the slightest clue what is going on, and how everyone is being played,” the report states.
When asked about the report and calls for his removal, Weyler responded to The Daily Beast in an email: “No comment.”
There you go Judy, instead of invoking Nigeria, you might have scribbled about octopus-like creatures, 5G, satanists and transhumans ... or perhaps settled for a tidy "no comment". You're welcome, have a nice day, don't come back for a little while yet, ya hear?
And so to another reptile offering this day, which featured a certain Geoff Chambers ...
"Resources sector"? Okay, that's passing fair, and Lloydie of he Amazon would have been proud at that way of dressing up a deep and abiding love of coal..
It's good, it's cunning window dressing, and it steps around the question of where's coal-loving, IPA-backing "resources sector" Gina?
There's an easy answer to that one for anyone with a google machine ...
But where's Lloydie? The pond simply had to put its mind at rest, and and went in search of the lad, fearing he might have headed off to do more Amazon saving. The pond discovered that Lloydie must be taking a break because these were his last two emissions ...
Sorry reptiles, you might think sending a star Chambers out on the job is the answer, but is the lad up to the task? Who else but Lloydie could discover the upside to bushfires? And your star Chambers last gobbet verges on the pitiful ...
Forget about Farmers for climate action, talk to AgForce ...
Oh yes technology, long-term projections, a pathway to zero emissions, yadda yadda, all good stuff, pressure on Labor etc etc, no doubt Lloydie would be pleased and think it passing fair, but for expert weaving of climate science denialism into a story, while puffing up the coalition of coal lovers, we desperately need Lloydie of the Amazon to return ...
Meanwhile, speaking of a coming to Jesus moment, the pond always knew the road to Goulburn was the best place to have it ... as celebrated by Rowe, with more celebrations here ...
Speaking of amusing distractions, the pond loved this little note in Crikey ...
That tweet is here, but you'll need to go to Crikey for the hot links ...
And speaking of star Chambers, the pond had to pay attention to our Henry, regurgitating a standard bout of reptile nonsense, because dammit, he doesn't want the hole in the bucket fixed, or even checked on. What's wrong with helping out your boyfriend when it comes to the odd grant or other deal?
Yes, never you mind about corrupt politicians - it's been the 'roach way of life since the Rum Rebellion - though as this is a day for distractions, the pond did love this other Crikey aside ...
As before, you'll have to go to Crikey to get the hot links, while the pond gets cracking with abolitionist Henry, and a standard history lesson a little distant from his usual ancient Greek turf, but not so far from blather about Nigeria ...
Why does the pond find all this immensely funny and charmingly irrelevant? Well anyone paying attention to the real world outside the lizard Oz la la land would have noted recent developments in another Star Chamber matter, as featured in the Graudian...
Yes, if we wanted to speak of star chambers, there's a goodly yarn going down about Xian Porter's unseemly behaviour ... cue the Graudian ...
Witness K’s actions helped expose a 2004 Australian bugging operation against an impoverished ally, Timor-Leste, which was designed to give Canberra the upper hand during sensitive negotiations to split oil and gas resources in the Timor Sea. A collection of oil and gas companies, led by Australian corporate Woodside, was hoping to exploit the natural resources in the Timor Sea.
The operation diverted intelligence resources during a period of heightened terror threat after the Bali bombings.
Collaery and Witness K had their homes raided by Australia’s domestic spy agency in 2013 as they were preparing to help Timor-Leste lodge a case in the international courts, alleging Australia’s spy operation meant it had negotiated in bad faith.
Witness K’s passport was taken and he was prevented from leaving to give evidence.
The proceedings at The Hague were never finalised but eventually a new deal over the Timor Sea resources was struck, giving a far better outcome to Timor-Leste.
The Australian government then signed off on prosecution of Collaery and Witness K. The former attorney general Christian Porter subsequently invoked the NSI Act to keep significant parts of Collaery’s trial secret.
Labor’s shadow attorney general, Mark Dreyfus, said on Wednesday that the court of appeal’s judgment was a “humiliating rebuff to the Morrison government”.
“Labor strongly supports the principle of open justice and believes Mr Collaery, like any other Australian, has a fundamental right to a fair trial,” he said.
“For reasons that still remain unclear, the former attorney general Christian Porter personally authorised the prosecution of Mr Collaery. After today’s decision the current attorney general must now provide a detailed explanation as to why this prosecution remains in the public interest.”
Human Rights Law Centre senior lawyer Kieran Pender said the case represented a rare win for an accused against the use of the NSI Act, which typically weigh in favour of secrecy.
“Because the NSI Act tilts the scales towards secrecy, defendants have typically failed to overcome the high bar in making the case for open justice,” he said. “But before the court, Collaery has done just that.”
Pender joined Labor in calling for a reconsideration of the prosecution, and separate cases against former military lawyer David McBride and tax office employee Richard Boyle, both of whom blew the whistle.
“There is no public interest in prosecuting whistleblowers – the CDPP can and should drop these cases,” he said.
And that's why the pond is profoundly pleased whenever Xian Porter cops another blow.
Now back to our Henry, wailing and moaning and offering a flurry of historical parallels that are sublimely meaningless ... but as for the dubious deeds of Lord Downer and his mob? No comment ...
It takes singular skill to bury the nose deep in the past, wallowing in ancient times when there's something going down in the present that our hole in the bucket man completely ignores, such is his desire to preserve politicians from scrutiny ...
Former Witness K lawyer Bernard Collaery says a ruling that lifts secrecy over significant parts of his trial is a “victory for justice” and a testament to the legal profession, which has banded together to support him through his prosecution.
The ACT court of appeal on Wednesday overturned a ruling that would have hidden evidence during Collaery’s trial from the public, saying there was a “very real risk of damage to public confidence” if it could not be publicly disclosed.
In handing down its ruling, the court cited the importance of open justice in preventing “political prosecutions”, allowing scrutiny of prosecutors, and giving the public the ability to assess an accused’s conduct.
Some evidence will still be kept secret and the matter has been remitted back to the ACT supreme court to consider further arguments from the federal attorney general, Michaelia Cash, whose government has used the National Security Information Act (NSI Act) in a bid to keep parts of the case from public view.
Independent senator Rex Patrick at a rally in support of Witness K and Bernard Collaery
Rex Patrick launches bid to make government reveal long-secret cabinet documents on Timor-Leste
Read more
Collaery told the Guardian the court of appeal ruling was a “victory overall for justice” and paid tribute to his lawyers, Gilbert and Tobin, and the rest of Australia’s legal fraternity for supporting him.
“For the commonwealth to spend millions on this pursuit, you can imagine the sacrifice the lawyers supporting me have made, not just in money they could have earned, because they’re pro-bono, but in time away from their families,” he said.
By way of contrast, here's a handy timeline, to be found here (paywall affected):
OCTOBER 16, 2020: Maguire tells the ICAC he regularly refrained from telling Berejiklian “too much detail” when they were in the relationship and agreed with her in a 2017 phone call when she said, “I don’t need to know that bit.”
OCTOBER 21, 2020: Senior advisers from the Premier’s office are called before a parliamentary inquiry to explain why the NSW Premier handed out $250 million in council grants without signed paperwork.
OCTOBER 23, 2020: Berejiklian gives Maguire’s Wagga Wagga electorate six grants totalling $40,000 from her discretionary fund - the inquiry heard that one of her advisers shredded the documents showing the Premier’s approval of projects under another scheme.
NOVEMBER 12, 2020: The NSW upper house votes to refer Berejiklian to the corruption watchdog for failing to report her relationship with Maguire.
DECEMBER 3, 2020: It is reported that Berejiklian oversaw a fund that set aside $5.5 million for a project championed by Maguire and that he allegedly later tried to profit from.
DECEMBER 28, 2020: Maguire referred to the ICAC by One Nation leader Mark Latham for not getting approval to travel from Berejiklian while he was in a secret relationship with her.
MARCH 2, 2021: The ICAC releases a statement confirming Operation Keppel, which is investigating Maguire, is ongoing.
MARCH 4, 2021: The Premier denies any wrongdoing over a meeting she held with her then lover Maguire about a highway that was more than 100 kilometres from his electorate but ran alongside an investment property he had just purchased.
MARCH 22, 2021: The ICAC refers Maguire to the NSW Director of Public Prosecutions for possible charges following final report on an inquiry into the conduct of councillors and staff at a council in Sydney’s west between 2014 and 2016.
JUNE 19, 2021: Berejiklian is dating high-profile barrister Arthur Moses, SC, the lawyer who represented her at a corruption hearing into Maguire.
OCTOBER 1, 2021: The ICAC announces an inquiry into the relationship, triggering the resignation of Berejiklian as Premier and an MP.
And there you have it, complete ignorance regarding persecution of whistleblowers and an idle defence of the indefensible, and they say that our hole in the bucket man has lost 'is touch! Never! Why he's an Arffer man, through and through ...
Indeed, indeed, but meanwhile the pond has an interesting little property speculation going, dear Henry. dear Henry, and the ear of a few state politicians.
Would you like to get in on the game? They've abolished ICAC, and we've not got much to fear from the plods! How about it? After all, dollops of sanctimonious righteous bullshit must mean you're ready to do an Arffer style deal about a nice little used unit, with barely a hundred clicks on the wound back clock ...
Thank the long absent lord there's no need to hold politicians to account (no, the pond won't go into that sordid business whereby a donation to a certain NSW political party helped get a street reservation changed, to the immense benefit of the people living on the street under the cloud of an impending freeway. The pond knows nothing about corruption, it just has a sweet deal going, suitable for Arffers and Henrys everywhere).
And so to end it all for the day with an infallible Pope, who just happens to be aware, in his infallible way, of that other matter touched on by the pond ...
Not much of a Friday, all things considered - at least not much to be said about it. But that's the problem with being dependent on reptiles: when they haven't got anything readable to write, we haven't got anything writeable to read. Well, not like this from the Chamberman, anyway: "An LNP MP said the influence of minor parties in central and north Queensland must not be ignored, warning votes were 'on the cliff'."
ReplyDeleteOh wau, so the rest of Australia, and the world, must be beholden to a bunch of backyard Queenslanders because their votes are "on the cliff". So Pauline Hanson, Clive Palmer and Bob Katter are the true rulers of Australia, and we must all give them whatever they want or we'll all suffer for it.
So, not thinking about the Senate particularly we can see that the fedeal Reps seats are:
NSW: LNP 22, Labor 24, Independent 1
Vic: LNP 15, Labor 21, Greens 1, Independent 1
Qld: LNP 23, Labor 6, Katter 1
WA: LNP 11, Labor 5
So if Labor can pick up say 2 NSW seats, 3 Vic seats and 3 WA seats, it could lose every one of its Qld seats and provided everything else stood unchanged, could still win government with 70 Reps seats to 75 LNP seats. provided that, as at present the Green, Centre Alliance and Independents voted with Labor and Katter stayed 'neutral'. A precarious majority of only 1, but it was enough for Gillard.
So of course if Labor actually held on to, say, 4 seats in Qld, it's in like Flynn. So much for the power of the Queensland rednecks.
Ah, poor Henry rushing to the defence of the rich and powerful yet again. How odd it is that so many blameless individuals have cut and run, not stood aside pending the investigation, actually resigned, just short of an important milestone in one case.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/news/outgoing-premier-gladys-berejiklian-set-to-miss-out-on-expensive-entitlement-benefits-program/news-story/d7f5a6c3161dfb05ec40a48220417654
It must be bullies on twitter that drove them out.
ICYMI
https://theshot.net.au/general-news/normalising-the-rot/
"The point, as ever with any form of politically motivated misinformation, or propaganda, this insignificant and stupid or otherwise, is the surface layer impression which is hammered home in micro increments by sheer mind-bludgeoning repetition over many, many years."
"That’s how they get ya: the gradual normalisation of ideas and rotting standards that should definitely not be considered normal."
And just further to the French theatrics GB
https://theshot.net.au/general-news/normalising-the-rot/
"Morrison’s decision to sensationally blind-side France, rather than exit the deal contractually over ongoing delivery failures, is set to be heavily exploited by Naval Group which has indicated it will aggressively pursue compensation."
The second link should be
Deletehttps://www.theklaxon.com.au/home/pms-naive-sub-deal-bungling-to-cost-dearly
Mmm - the Henry meanders off into some quite irrelevant history, as is his way.
DeleteHe then blithely conflates the - feasances (mal-, mis- and the almost forgotten non-) with ‘corruption’.
The NSW ICAC legislation does include (S 8) the -feasances (feasance can stand alone as a word - for doing an act, particularly out of duty) in its ‘General Nature of Corrupt Conduct’, but that long list of actions do not rate as potentially corrupt conduct unless they could ‘constitute or involve’ a criminal act, or a disciplinary offence, or grounds for dismissal of an official, or - for any MP - a breach of a code of conduct.
One problem for the Henry is that, in mentioning feasances in particular, he is including acts that have long been torts, with blatantly criminal acts - plundering the treasury.
In English law, cases involving nonfeasance - public officials just not doing their job - are remarkably rare. They are notoriously difficult to mount, and few persons, even of substantial personal wealth, are likely to rush into one. Of course, the idea of law firms being prepared to take on such a case on a ‘no win no cost’ basis has been proclaimed anathema by that guardian of our rights - the IPA, so we need say no more on that possibility.
Just try to imagine a system in which citizens could bring officials to account for not doing their job! Oh, the horror.
So - for all the matters listed as potentially corrupt conduct, the Henry sees no need of a body that can target investigations involving public officials - and he offers no alternative. Nah - much better to leave it to the slow grind of the rest of our legal system, which would mean that the nomenklatura need not be distracted from running our affairs as only they know how, and that they have a comfortable existence long after they have stepped away from the stress of public office.
Oh - if he wanted to cite some early, obscure, history - he might have given us Eleanor of Arborea, a Sardinian heroine, who is credited with the first inclusion of ‘misfeasance’ in a legal code, in 1394. Eleanor’s ‘Carta de Logu’ remained in use much longer than the Star Chamber.
That is interesting about Gold-standard Gladys cutting and running just a few months before the arrival of the gravy-train. Especially as one imagines she is being 'competently' advised by her current squeeze. All done in such a hurry, too.
DeleteNothing like Teflon Dan, who isn't in any hurry to go anywhere just because a bunch of anti-corruptionists have him under the microscope (or so they say). It'll be interesting to see what, if anything, emerges after the period of time since the "events".
The article in The Shot also included: "Humans have a remarkable ability to acclimarise to almost anything." Well, yeah, it's known as “shifting baselines syndrome” aka "frog in hot water syndrome". Or, as it's said, humans often don’t remember what we’ve lost or demand that it be restored. Rather, we adjust to what we’ve got.
It's called 'fatalism'; in short that all life is subject to fatality sooner or later, so just put up with things until it's your turn to go. And frequently humans don't even know what they have lost, because none of it impinged on them anyway.
As to the Naval Group and its extortionism, well, the cheese eating surrender monkeys are like that. And even if they do manage to get awarded - in which court, where exactly ? - the full amount is only about $400m. Mere chicken feed to the 13th biggest economy in the world (we used to be 11th, but South Korea and Spain have overtaken us). Love the way that Naval Group is called the "French defence giant". Wau, we're being attacked by a "giant", we're utterly done for.
Hmm. "Feasance is defined as a legal term for how something is done or accomplished. An example of feasance is how well a person completed their community service." Can't say I'm aware of ever having used 'feasance" as a standalone word, but then: "1,062,759.4 Number of Words in the English Language, January 1, 2021, estimate" [https://languagemonitor.com/number-ofwords/number-of-words-in-english/#:] so I'm not entirely surprised there's a few I have never actually used.
ReplyDeleteHaving on some occasions myself been "an official" (though of extremely low rank) and as I understand from prior interactions you also have been, Chad, it's often just a little difficult to find out exactly what one's "job" actually is. "Other duties as directed" perhaps ?
Leastways [another word I've never used before], you have, IMHO, stated the situation with your usual clarity: can't live with 'em, can't live without 'em. And can't do anything about 'em. Maybe we'll just have to declare an end to it all and start again. And maybe our total inability to face up to what we've already done, will give those who survive the chance to start again.