Thursday, November 07, 2024

Speaking of the sorrow and the pity, the pond has a triptych of reptiles on hand to celebrate ...


Pity about Ukraine, pity about Gaza and the Palestinian people (Biden can also take full credit), pity about American women seeking health care (especially in Florida), pity about vaccines, pity about fluoride, pity about crypto, pity about those mass deportations, pity about the sundry and varied persecutions of the others and the different, pity about those epic trade wars, pity about the war with China, pity about that immunity thing for kings and emperors, pity about all the corruption, pity that the United States has embraced an authoritarian con artist and snake oil salesman, pity about delusional states of existence, pity about the racism and the misogyny, pity about uncle Leon slashing and burning, pity about the Justice department, pity about the planet, and a large serve of pity for the pitiful celebration of climate science denialism, and a dollop of pity for those who accept the climate science, or any science at all, because who knows when the next pandemic might turn up ...

Oh there's a lot to pity to go around, and plenty of liberal tears. On the up side the mainstream media have accomplished their mission and will have four more years of impotent moaning and wailing at what they have helped bring into being with their plentiful sanewashing. No pity for them.

Perhaps the orange Jesus will be content with burgers, golf, the telly and getting up at 11am to saunter into office and pose with guests, as kings and emperors are wont to do, never reading his small set of one word briefing notes, and parading around in triumph; it's more the damage that his minions might do in his name. What a weird gallery of rogues they are, too numerous to list here, all grifters in their own way...

They've also made life difficult for the pond. 

The pond was well over writing about the Mango Mussolini, if only because he turned up in every second lizard Oz column ... the task will be to find to find a reptile not infatuated by his follies, despite their love of the circus and their excitement at the cavalcade of clowns, the cortège of cabalists, who will actually run things in their own patented chaotic way, serving at the whim of the monarch... buckle up, there might be some turbulence.

For the moment there's no escaping it, with the lizard Oz offering wall to wall coverage, way below what this screen cap captures ...




Over on the extreme far right the lizard Oz's chattering class could talk of nothing else ...




Lord Downer at the top of the pack! Simplistic Simon seeing a chance for the mutton Dutton to do the same. Perhaps put abortion at the top of his policies? Or just behind nuking the country?

Lurking in the alleged news area were the likes of the bromancer, nattering "Ned" and Killer Creighton, celebrating the ecstasy of the deplorables, fancying they might now be given brand new garbage trucks.

The pond can't deal with all of them, and instead held the mic up to old pond favourites, asking if not for a blow job, then for a reaction. 

First came the bromancer, mouth moistened to provide pleasure, relief and a happy ending ...

Historic win for leader whose courage carried the day
Whether you like Donald Trump or not, it’s an extraordinary achievement, a nearly unbelievable comeback, a triumph of one man’s will, and of democracy itself.

Only the bromancer could see the election of an authoritarian with pronounced fascist tendencies as a triumph of democracy, but then there were good people on both sides in the 1930s ...

As usual there was an image to get things going: Donald Trump speaks during the election night event at the West Palm Beach Convention Centre. Picture: AFP




Then came the bromancer in wildly excited mood ... and according to the reptiles it only took a three minute read to bring him off ...

Donald Trump and his historic victory are American democracy.
Kamala Harris and Joe Biden claimed Trump was a mortal threat to democracy.
The American people emphatically disagreed. It looks like Trump will be the first Republican presidential candidate to win the national popular vote since ­George W Bush in 2004.
Whether you like him or not, that’s an extraordinary achievement, a nearly unbelievable comeback, a triumph of one man’s will, and of democracy itself.
The Democrats claimed Trump was a Nazi, the new Adolf Hitler. That was surely the most ridiculous rhetorical overreach in modern democracy.
Trump increased his support among blacks, increased by double digits among Hispanics, won a ­majority of Catholics, more women than anyone imagined, and over half the electorate in a high-turnout election.
Although Trump’s campaign avoided policy substance, it is still a ­magnificent demonstration of American democracy.
Whether you like Trump or not, the result is an enormous personal vindication for him – assassination attempts, felony convictions, the near hysterical opposition of almost all the media, almost all of Hollywood, an even higher proportion of academia, and with a huge financial advantage for the Harris campaign, Trump overcame all obstacles.
It’s not Trump but the Democrats who’ve had the problem with democracy. Everything Trump has achieved he’s achieved democratically. His appalling behaviour on January 6, 2021, involved encouraging a violent riot, not a military coup.
He was a pariah then. His comeback testifies to his astonishing will, energy and persistence.
At the beginning of the Republican primaries, Trump was well behind Florida Governor, Ron DeSantis. But he decisively won the primaries.
The Democrats for the past eight years have been scared of democracy. Hillary Clinton in 2016 was the party establishment candidate and there was hardly a primary process. Covid in 2020 enabled Biden to campaign from his basement in a disembodied and highly artificial fashion. Biden governed in an equally isolated fashion, avoiding any spontaneous press interactions.
Biden’s selfish decision to hang on as long as possible constricted the possibility of a Democratic primary process. Instead, the party imposed Vice-President Harris without primaries. Harris was a weak candidate who, like Biden, tried to avoid the normal give and take of democratic politics – press conferences, unsympathetic interviews, unscripted interactions with voters.
Harris has never won a Democratic primary. A democratic process would have yielded a candidate like Michigan governor, Gretchen Whitmer, or Pennsylvania Governor, Josh Shaprio. But the Democratic Party was scared of democracy. Ultimately, it out smarted itself, a victim of its own cynical tactics.
It was scared of any democracy involving Trump, too. So the Democrat establishment, quite improperly using every organ of state it could lay its hands on, tried to criminalise Trump’s politics with some of the most ridiculous criminal prosecutions in American history. The American people just didn’t buy it.
Nonetheless, most voters probably aren’t in love with Trump, in the way they once were with ­Ronald Reagan, or before him Jack Kennedy, or before him Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
Rather, they voted for Trump in spite of his failings, while admiring his strength and purpose.
The most telling figures were these. Going into election day, some 72 per cent of Americans thought their country was on the wrong track. Barely 40 per cent approved of the job Biden was doing. No incumbent party candidate has ever won the presidency with figures like that.

Speaking of telling figures, here's another highlight:




Carry on regardless bromancer:

This was an election which any professional politician should have won against Harris. It’s tempting to think that De Santis, or Nikki Haley, might have had a bigger victory. But these coulda beens, woulda beens, aren’t worth a hill o’ beans.
Trump is the guy who actually did it, won the Republican primaries, survived the assassin’s bullet, and won an unprecedented vote.
While the polls told us broadly the truth, that the election would be fairly close, they did once more underestimate Trump’s vote nationally and in several battleground states.
How is it that the polls keep under estimating Trump in this way?
When Trump spoke after his victory the first thing he said was that he wanted now to heal the ­nation.
Trump seemed almost benign in this moment.
It’s worth recalling that the Democrats never accepted the legitimacy of Trump’s first victory, dishonestly constructing a Russian collusion conspiracy which had no basis in fact, and mobilising every part of the government that thought Trump beyond the pale, especially, to their everlasting shame, many former intelligence chiefs.
The good thing is this time Trump’s victory is clear cut. Everyone should accept the legitimacy of his presidency, including everyone overseas, including allies such as Australia.
These are bound to be pretty turbulent times. A calm temperament, a positive outlook, a steady approach, strong message discipline and a positive attitude would serve all interlocutors well.

So that's the bromancer's message:




The pond would have preferred an evocative cartoon ...




Then the pond put the mic in front of nattering "Ned". 

In previous times, "Ned" has had something of a dry mouth when it comes to responses to the MM ...but he did better this time:

Trump Mark II’s shock and awe mandate
America’s progressive march has been halted in its tracks. The Democrats have nobody to blame but themselves. This is a defeat for their economic priorities, climate-change action and identity politics.

Oh be fair, "Ned", possibly blame could be shared with all those malevolent oligarchs with deep pockets, not least the one who runs the baying Faux Noise.

As usual, "Ned" started with an obligatory snap of the winner, Donald Trump points to supporters with former first lady Melania Trump during an election night event at the Palm Beach Convention Center. Picture: AFP




On the upside, the reptiles suggested that "Ned", like the bromancer, was only a three minute wonder, and so it came to pass:

Donald Trump has a mandate to re-make America and shock the world.
This is Trump’s greatest victory. It is an astonishing personal triumph, a historic turning point that testifies to a changing, yet bitterly divided, America. It is a devastating repudiation of the Democratic Party establishment and progressive politics.
The judgment cannot be sharper: a majority of Americans were more alarmed about the direction of their country than they were about Trump’s character. Kamala Harris could never conquer that bedrock reality. She is where she lost.
On current trends, Trump is probably winning the popular vote, something he didn’t achieve in 2016 or 2020. Trump Mark II will be a more assertive president than before, battle-hardened, unpredictable, vindicated, and surely vindictive.
This was a contest between two deeply flawed candidates. But the American public knew Trump. He was loathed and loved, but perceived as formidable while dangerous and unscrupulous. Harris, by contrast, was largely unknown until the last 100 days. She lacked political authority, relied excessively on the women’s vote, banked on anti-Trump sentiment and never distanced herself from an unpopular Biden Administration.
The wide swathes of Middle America knew Trump wasn’t any saint, but they turned the electoral map red because they endorsed his bedrock positions: that living standards were in retreat, inflation was too high, borders were not secure and elites were too arrogant.
Trump won on two trends – the blunders of the Democrats that opened the door to him and the legions of Republicans voters who insisted on having Trump as their candidate. That story has no precedent, given Trump insisted the 2020 election was stolen from him, encouraged the January 6 storming of the Capitol, became a convicted felon and was ready to claim another fraud if he lost in 2024.
America’s progressive march has been halted in its tracks. The Democrats have nobody to blame but themselves. This is a defeat for their economic priorities, climate-change action and identity politics. When Biden won in 2020 he pledged to govern for all Americans. He didn’t. He ran a radical progressive agenda consumed by hubris. Biden assumed Trump was finished, then assumed he could beat candidate Trump, only to be forced to stand down leaving Harris as the stopgap with little time to prove herself.
This election will provoke a reckoning in America. The country is deeply broken. For every Trump champion there is a Trump opponent. Much will depend upon how Trump conducts himself. The irony of this election is that the Democrats, having warned that Trump was a threat to democracy, now find that the operation of that democracy has returned him to office.
The lesson: democracy is hard. The Democrats must accept the people’s verdict that Trump, four years ago, refused to accept. Another lesson: democracy is not always fair.
Being fair to Harris, she polled better than Biden would have polled. But the fundamentals were against Harris. Polls showed that 70 per cent of Americans felt their nation was heading in the wrong direction. The public wanted to vote out the Biden-Harris Administration.
And Harris, fatally, couldn’t say where she disagreed with Biden. She was tied to an unpopular economy and a failed president.
Her campaign, probably inevitably, focused on the “never Trump” vote-getting strategy but Harris could never grasp that while people mightn’t like Trump, they agreed with the grievances he articulated.
Harris and the Democrats lost much of the working class vote they once owned. The party has been defeated by the candidate they loathed and much of the reason lies within their own priorities and values.
J D Vance called Trump’s win the “greatest political comeback in American history” – and nobody could disagree.
Many questions remain. Might Trump and Vance lay the foundations for a new US centre-right majority? Will Trump trigger a global trade war? Will he sell out Ukraine and Taiwan? How will Trump resolve the conflict between his free-market and government interventionist advisers? And finally, how will Anthony Albanese manage President Trump?

Questions? The pond has always acted on the assumption then when barking mad people howl at the moon, accept that they find the moon somehow disturbing or threatening, and that they will act accordingly, untrammelled by consequences or guard-rails.

Here have a cleansing, optimistic cartoon making that very point:




And so to the looniest response of them all, provided by Lord Downer in

MAGA redux carries bitter truths for the left
This is the worst day for the left since Vladimir Lenin got off the train in St Petersburg in 1917

It takes a most unique vision of the Lord Downer kind to evoke Lenin and 1917. 

Then the reptiles came up with a suitable opening snap, Former US President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks during an election night event at the West Palm Beach Convention Center in West Palm Beach, Florida, showing the MM in Christ-like pose, another grifter, perhaps posing as Mary, to one side:




Then it was on with Lord Downer comprehensively missing the point:

The only Australian I can think of who will be in bad odour with Donald Trump is me. I don’t think he’ll ever forgive me for passing on information his own aide gave me that the Russians had intelligence on Hillary Clinton that would be damaging.
If I were Trump, I wouldn’t give that aide a job. As for me, I’m sure he’ll quickly forget my name and my existence.
But there is much we can learn from the American election.
First, there’s the impact of negative campaigning. There’s no doubt it works but it has to be carefully calibrated.
The Democrats and their fellow travellers relentlessly ran the line that Trump was a fascist, a Nazi, a threat to democracy and a friend of Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong-un and Xi Jinping. So exaggerated were these claims, so hysterical, that aspect of the Democrats’ campaign was completely disregarded.
After all, it wasn’t as though Trump were an unknown quantity. He already had been the president for four years and he didn’t terminate democracy and become a fascist leader during that time, whatever you might have thought of his policies.

Forgive Lord Downer, he still likes to see himself as a mover and a shaper, and a player, shuffling on to the stage, an attendant lord. Perhaps not Hamlet nor meant to be, but one who could swell a progress or start a scene or two.

At this point the reptiles interrupted Lord Downer's posturing with a snap of the Satanic she woman gossiping on the phone while the Titanic headed towards the iceberg:




Then it was back to Lord Downer's array of astonishing insights:

And it is true he was convicted of an offence, but the perception of many voters was that the conviction was politically driven – which it probably was. The lawfare against Trump became, after a while, a complete obsession of the Democrats that became self-defeating.
Kamala Harris may have been the Vice-President for the past four years but she has been very low profile. The challenge for her was to get herself known and to be seen as someone who successfully could address the concerns of the American people. That required her having a suite of relevant policies and being able to argue for those policies against the onslaught of the Republicans.
Instead, Harris refused for quite some weeks to be interviewed at all and her failure to be held to account became a story in and of itself.
What’s more, she did have some policies to address the cost-of-living issue and immigration, yet she spent the latter part of the campaign reverting to endless attacks on Trump.
However imperfect Trump may be, the only compelling case Harris made for her candidacy was that she was not him. That was never going to work with half the population who were already committed to Trump.
For Trump himself, his campaign’s great strength was his capacity to stare down his numerous critics in politics and the media.
His campaign was not perfect, though. It had two serious weaknesses. The first was Trump’s failure to stick to a message.

What about staging an attempted coup, the storming of the Capitol? Why apparently it was just like tossing tea leaves overboard, a never no mind, not worth mentioning. It seems it was just a love fest, and soon the lovers will be pardoned for their indiscretions.

It wouldn't be a reptile column without the dragging in of Sky News - the reptiles love a bit of in-house incest - and so there came some video relief, screen capped by the pond to avoid startling possums:

Sky News host James Morrow says Donald Trump’s success derives from “pushing up against the establishment”. Donald Trump is set to become the 47th President of the United States. The former president is projected to secure well over 270 electoral votes as well as the popular vote.




Then it was back to Lord Downer, now warming to the task at hand:


Some of his personal attacks, the claim of immigrants eating cats and dogs in Springfield, Ohio, the personal abuse of Liz Cheney and so on were certainly not vote winners. His attacks on Harris were also too personally abusive. To call Harris thick and unintelligent might appeal to his base but would be seen only as vulgar party politicking by swing voters.
He would have done even better had he stuck to the cost of living, immigration and no world war themes. They were cut-through messages.
Second, the Democrats did do well in attacking Trump over the abortion issue. It wasn’t, of course, true that Trump himself wanted to ban abortions but he was held responsible for the US Supreme Court overturning Rowe v Wade, as he had appointed three members of the court. That decision ruled it was unconstitutional for the federal government to make policy on abortion – that remains the preserve of the states.
Still, Trump’s attempt to present himself as pro-choice was unsuccessful and in doing that he not only failed to convince many women who were pro-choice but also alienated some of his evangelical supporters who were pro-life.
There’s a lesson there for Australia: keep away from the abortion issue as best you possibly can. Trump lost a large number of female votes because of this issue and you can be sure the Australian Labor Party is planning to run this issue against the federal Liberals.
One of the good things that has come out of the American election is that American voters are less inclined to vote on racial or ethnic lines.
That about 25 per cent of black men voted for Trump and he won a significant proportion of Hispanic votes is a sign that the messages about race are losing traction. Academics and commentators who have been promoting critical race theory will be deeply disappointed by this.

Naturally the reptiles took the opportunity to slip in a snap of the new heroine of the Tory rump, a certain Kemi Badenoch, on the principle that the Monty Python skit about the black knight is something for the Tories to emulate:




Then it was back to Lord Downer for his closing remarks:

Their attempts to salami slice the country into racial and ethnic groups in competition with each other has been sorely defeated by this election. Voters are clearly much more concerned about the cost of living and illegal immigration then they are their own racial or ethnic groups.
This was an election that was a step towards what new British Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch says of racial politics: “I look to the day when the colour of our skin is no more significant than the colour of our eyes or the colour of our hair.”
Finally, do we Australians have anything to fear from a Trump presidency? Generally speaking, I think Trump will continue to maintain a strong alliance with Australia and AUKUS will be secure. I’ve said before, I doubt that Trump will impose tariffs on Australian exports to the US.
And it will be important that our federal government does everything it can to ensure that doesn’t happen.
As to personnel, it is true that Anthony Albanese and Kevin Rudd have given very negative character references of Trump in years gone by. Be that as it may, that’s politics. Trump and his administration, when they finally come to office on January 20, should accept Australia’s right to choose its own ambassador and understand that Rudd can change his mind on any topic as quickly as the summer breeze can change direction.
This is the worst day for the left since Vladimir Lenin got off the train in St Petersburg in 1917.

Or perhaps the worst day for the planet, given the MM's attitude to, and understanding of climate science? The pond won't mind much, the pond won't be around for the worst of it, but occasionally does pause to wonder about the fate of all those vulgar youffs who voted for the MM.

As for his Lordship evoking Lenin, what a dumb cluck he is, a voice from a now distant past:

Alexander Downer was foreign minister from 1996 to 2007 and high commissioner to the UK from 2014 to 2018.

His Lordship was nonetheless, in his references heading back to 1917, in keeping with the mood:




Never mind, time to close in the usual way with a celebratory cartoon, and as usual the immortal Rowe was on hand, catching the mood in his inimitable way:





As always it's in the Dorian Gray detail that the mood comes across the best:







Wednesday, November 06, 2024

The pond dissembled ...it's not over yet, Dame Slap and the rest of the reptile pack have seen to that ...

 

The pond has taken to showing its homework as a way of defending its reptile choice of the day ... but can there ever be any defence for returning to that ineffable, inexplicable wellspring of far right bigotry, Dame Slap?

Well yes, examine the choices on the extreme far right of the digital lizard Oz this morning ...




"Ned" doing Albo and on a Wednesday and what's more, straying from his mission to bore readers senseless on the weekend? 

The bromancer doing defence for the umpteenth time and in his usual predictable way, more reliable than a Shinkansen service? At least Dame Slap offered the chance to sing along to a musical ...

On what's allegedly the news side of the digital rag, the reptiles were full of it, idle speculation until the cows and the voters come home ...




Simplistic Simon doing a hard place rock routine? 

Not likely, ,please hand the bigot's wayward bigot's copy, over beginning with the header ...

Democrats pack a risk to Supreme Court’s integrity

Donald Trump is often described as a threat to democracy. His behaviour after the 2020 election was despicable. But only dills would claim democracy is automatically safe in the hands of Kamala Harris.

Say what?

His behaviour after the 2020 election was despicable.

Could this come from the same keyboard warrior who strode out into the New York night in ecstatic, neigh orgasmic, triumph?


The pond never gets tired of running that one, but rarely runs a bit of the accompanying text in Trump's people take back their Capitol, but wotthehell, toujours gai Archy, this is Dame Slap day....



Ah the glories of the layout in the reptile archives.

And the pond also has a desire to reproduce the Dame Slap origin story:

What’s all this? she shouted, in a very fierce voice. Form up in a line. March past me at once!




To the children’s dismay every one got a good hard slap as they passed the cross old lady.
Now, please, answer the questions written on the blackboard, said Dame Slap. You have each got paper and pencil. Any one putting down the wrong answers will be very sorry indeed.
Jo looked at the questions on the board. He read them out to the others, in great astonishment.
  • If you take away three caterpillars from one bush, how many gooseberries will there be left ?
  • Add a pint of milk to a peck of peas and say what will be left over?
  • If a train runs at six miles an hour and has to pass under four tunnels, put down what the guard’s mother is likely to have for dinner on Sundays?
  • How many far right loons of the Clarence Thomas and Sam Alito kind will it take to satiate Janet Albrechtsen's bigotry?
  • How many women must be killed while seeking health care in the USA? 
Everybody gazed at the board in despair. Whatever did the questions mean? They seemed to be nonsense.
I can’t do any, said Moon-Face, in a loud voice, and he threw down his pencil. It’s all silly nonsense! said Jo, and he threw down his pencil too.
The girls did the same, and Silky tore her paper in half! All the pixie and fairy-folk stared at them in the greatest astonishment and horror.
Indeed! said Dame Slap, suddenly looking twice as big as usual. If that’s how you feel, come with me!
Dame Slap led them to a small room and pushed them all in. Then she shut the door with a slam and turned the key in the lock.
You will stay there for three hours, and then I will come and see if you are sorry, and agree to appointing at least three more far right loons to the Supreme Court, so it's properly balanced, she said.
Nobody liked it. They all sat on the floor and looked angry and miserable. If only they could escape from Dame Slap’s silly old school.

Perhaps the pond can help the children with one of those tricky questions, but first a note that, as is the reptiles current wont, they began with a snap identifying the Satanic anti-Christ about to be berated by Dame Slap for being a witch, and showing her toil and bubble and endless trouble, while speaking during a campaign rally in Philly ...




Oh come on, this one's for Philly lovers, courtesy of The Bulwark ...




Eagle eyed jokes aside, lay on, Dame Slap ...

Donald Trump is often described as a threat to democracy. His behaviour after the 2020 election was nothing short of despicable. But only dills would claim that democracy is automatically safe in the hands of Kamala Harris.
Should she win the US presidential race on Wednesday (AEDT), and if the Democrats hold the US Senate, then democracy may suffer a wild ride of a ­different sort.
If Harris and her fellow Democrats succeed in their plans to “reform” the US Supreme Court, Alexander Hamilton will not just roll in his grave, he will surely rise up and hand deliver copies of one of his most famous founding documents about SCOTUS.
Harris has said that she wants “some kind of reform” and Democrats have lined up with a range of proposals that she has not ruled out. We’re familiar enough with a president trying to “stack” the court with preferred judges.
Some Democrats have something more radical in mind. They want to pack the court. They propose increasing the number of justices from nine (the composition of the Supreme Court since 1869) to 15 over three presidential terms.
The reason? Democrats aren’t shy. They don’t like the decisions of the current conservative-leaning court. They claim that Americans have lost confidence in the nation’s highest court, especially after the Dobbs decision that overturned the progressive invention of new abortion rights in Roe v Wade. Proposing to pack the court is a great way to fire up your political base in the lead-up to a presidential election.

Ah, something more radical in mind, a packed court, a wild ride. 

Is that wild ride the same ride as this woman took in Georgia?

In her final hours, Amber Nicole Thurman suffered from a grave infection that her suburban Atlanta hospital was well-equipped to treat.
She’d taken abortion pills and encountered a rare complication; she had not expelled all of the fetal tissue from her body. She showed up at Piedmont Henry Hospital in need of a routine procedure to clear it from her uterus, called a dilation and curettage, or D&C.
But just that summer, her state had made performing the procedure a felony, with few exceptions. Any doctor who violated the new Georgia law could be prosecuted and face up to a decade in prison.
Thurman waited in pain in a hospital bed, worried about what would happen to her 6-year-old son, as doctors monitored her infection spreading, her blood pressure sinking and her organs beginning to fail.
It took 20 hours for doctors to finally operate. By then, it was too late. (ProPublica)

Or perhaps it was the wild ride this woman in Texas...

Josseli Barnica grieved the news as she lay in a Houston hospital bed on Sept. 3, 2021: The sibling she’d dreamt of giving her daughter would not survive this pregnancy.
The fetus was on the verge of coming out, its head pressed against her dilated cervix; she was 17 weeks pregnant and a miscarriage was “in progress,” doctors noted in hospital records. At that point, they should have offered to speed up the delivery or empty her uterus to stave off a deadly infection, more than a dozen medical experts told ProPublica.
But when Barnica’s husband rushed to her side from his job on a construction site, she relayed what she said the medical team had told her: “They had to wait until there was no heartbeat,” he told ProPublica in Spanish. “It would be a crime to give her an abortion.”
For 40 hours, the anguished 28-year-old mother prayed for doctors to help her get home to her daughter; all the while, her uterus remained exposed to bacteria.
Three days after she delivered, Barnica died of an infection.
(ProPublica)

Oh noble Jurists, oh infinitely wise Supreme Court. Please let Dame Slap continue to sing your praises ... but first for some strange reason the reptiles decided to slip in a snap of A protestor outside the US Supreme Court.




Who knows why that rabid ratbag was protesting? What's wrong with the divine right of kings and presidents? (And if you happen to stage a coup, remember to carry your immunity card).

Isn't it grand that contending oligarchs can spend billions trying to buy an election, thanks to the infinite wisdom of those ineffable jurists?

Please, let Dame Slap defend Clarence hanging around with said billionaires and making out like a luxury RV owning bandit, and Sam the man on board with spouse hanging flags to celebrate the coup:

Ever since an earlier Democrat president, Franklin D. Roosevelt tried and failed to pack the Supreme Court in 1937, proposals like these have been mere daydreams on the fringes of the mad left. So mad that a Senate judiciary at the time said this: “It is a measure which should be so emphatically rejected that its parallel will never again be presented to the free representatives of the free people of America.”
Never say never. Packing the court with more judges to change its ideological bent has become part of the progressive mainstream. That doesn’t make this proposal any less dangerous. Hamilton will explain why in a moment.
The other “reform” proposals include congress enacting term limits for judges, laws to govern judicial ethics, and a law to require a two-thirds majority of judges to declare an act of congress unconstitutional.
This is a radical attempt by congressional Democrats to grab power from the Supreme Court. It will drown the Court in political games regardless of who’s in charge of the White House and congress. If the Democrats pass these laws to undermine the court’s independence, it’s likely that when the tables turn, a Republican president and congress will return fire.
First principles should guide us every day of the week. And they need to be shouted from the rooftops when politicians try to undermine the independence of courts.
Those first principles are set out in The Federalist Papers. Written after the American Revolution by Alexander Hamilton, John Madison and John Jay, the Federalist Papers convinced the states to ratify a new federal constitution. They argued, successfully, for a series of fundamental checks and balances between three arms of government to ensure America was equipped to respond to the challenges of nationhood.
We know from the musical that Hamilton was a genius; and that he wrote 51 of the 85 essays in the Federalist Papers. Among them is Federalist 78, written in 1788. It’ a gem that Harris and fellow Democrats have tossed aside.
The judiciary, Hamilton wrote, will always be the “least dangerous” branch of government – provided it remains independent from the executive and the legislature.
“The executive not only dispenses the honours, but holds the sword of the community. The legislature not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated. The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments.”

You see? Dame Slap learns things from watching musicals, and to celebrate the reptiles ran a cheap arsed stock photo of Alexander Hamilton:




Perhaps it's better to live in the past than dwell in the present:




Now please allow Dame Slap to explain how the spirit of Hamilton is alive in Clarence the supplicant, and Sam the flag man, and the beer swilling Brett and gor blimey billionaire loving Gorsuch, and weird religious cultist Amy, frequently joined by enabler little Johnny G. Roberts ..





More on Clarence and his mates at ProPublica and that last snap was also from ProPublica, but on with the singing and the dancing Dame Slap style...

Hamilton explained that although “individual oppression may now and then proceed from the courts of justice, the general liberty of the people can never be endangered from that quarter … so long as the judiciary remains truly distinct from both the legislature and the executive. For I agree that ‘there is no liberty if the power of judging be not separated from the legislative and executive powers’.”
Long before the Democrats’ radical plans to play political games with the US Supreme Court, Hamilton understood that the courts are “in continual jeopardy of being overpowered, awed, or influenced by its co-ordinate branches”. “Liberty,” he wrote, “can have nothing to fear from the judiciary alone, but would have everything to fear from its union with either of the other ­departments.”
Hamilton explained why courts must check the power of parliaments that try to act beyond their legislative power. “There is no position which depends on clearer principles than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void,” he wrote.
“No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the constitution, can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves.”
He said that a constitution must not enable “the representatives of the people to substitute their WILL to that of their constituents. It is far more rational to suppose that the courts were designed to be an intermediate body between the people and the ­legislature, in order, among other things, to keep the latter within the limits assigned to their authority.”
Using capitals to fine effect, Hamilton reminded judges of their place too. He said if judges are “disposed to exercise WILL instead of JUDGMENT, the consequence would equally be the substitution of their pleasure to that of the legislative body”.
Hamilton understood that, in coming years and centuries, when sufficiently annoyed with judgments of the US Supreme Court, politicians would try to chip away at the court’s independence.

As Dame Slap was in a musical mood, it's only fitting that the reptiles interrupted with a snap of Jason Arrow as Alexander Hamilton. Picture: Daniel Boud




At this point the pond thought a cartoon might be more to the point:



As for climate science, abortion and such like, don't you worry about any of that. Dame Slap understands the infinite wisdom of the learned jurists, expert in all manner of things scientific, and adept on ruling out any pesky regulation that might ruin the arduous work of fucking the planet:

A recent edition of The Harvard Law Review claimed that those calling for reform after recent Supreme Court judgments on climate change and abortion are not sore losers. Instead, the court’s judgments “crossed a moral line” and are “causing grave substantive harm” to the country.
Translation: court “reformers” aren’t angry about Supreme Court decisions; they are VERY angry. And that warrants undermining judicial independence. Those are my capitals, not Hamilton’s.
When Hamilton’s brilliant enunciation of the separation of powers is ignored even by legal academics, and by those in high political office, it’s little wonder that ordinary people struggle to appreciate the importance of judicial independence.
It’s worth reading (or re-reading) Hamilton’s Federalist 78. If more among our current elected representatives understood these first principles well enough to defend them, simply and forcefully, our future would be brighter. As Abraham Lincoln said in his ­famous Gettysburg Address, liberty is unfinished business. The living must fight for the principles that secure the liberty of future generations.
Hamilton II – The Musical, anyone? The next musical could put Federalist 78 to music, add a touch of rap, and hey presto, even the left might learn something about the role of the courts.

The pond suspects that last short paragraph is an actual attempt at Dame Slap humour or wit, but for some reason the pond's attempt at laugher was cruelly aborted ...

And so to a concluding immortal Rowe, reminding the pond that there are things outside Dame Slap's school to dwell on ...




Tuesday, November 05, 2024

Please, this phase will soon be over ...

 

Shattered, neigh, devastated ...

This being Tuesday, the pond had hoped to renew the old acquaintance with Dame Groan (how can she e'er be forgot?), and indulge in the idle pursuit of pesky, uppity furriner bashing... as much fun as snake bashing in Springfield, with snake flesh as tasty as a cat or a dog.

It would have been a great distraction from a horse race the pond has absolutely no interest in, and a way to avoid the US election, which will soon be over, but which could be followed by a nightmare. 

For some reason, early in the morn, she seems to have took a powder, scurried off the field, briefly disappeared to the corn field, leaving a deep sense of injustice, unfairness and betrayal. Instead the pond has been left with the bromancer celebrating the Mango Mussolini yet again...

The pond understands many will follow Dame Groan and disappear at the get go. 

The pond's partner immediately leaves the room the moment that the MM appears on screen, and refuses to return until his braying ends... but what choice did the pond have? 

Look what was on offer in the far right of the lizard Oz ...




Dear sweet long absent lord, talk about Sophie's choice. 

The pond can hear a kindly possum murmuring from a distance that the pond should look on the left of the digital edition, which is still on the extreme far right (there is no left in this bizarro world), but in a different position.

Sorry, there's just more gibberish ...




So there you have it, and here's the bro, and that's all the pond has for the day. Perhaps even a tedious horse race might be better, on the off chance a horse might die ...

A Trump victory will be the better outcome for Australia

America would almost certainly be stronger internationally and project a more credible deterrence under Trump than it would under Harris.

The reptiles promise that it's only a five minute read, but in that time you could have enjoyed a manly bout of dinkum Aussie sex ... (sorry, the two minute joke works better).

As usual the reptiles opened with a snap, and unfortunately it was the usual suspect, when a snap of a cane toad might have been more stimulating and uplifting...




As if no one knew Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump (in Iowa Jima  pose).Then the bro got into the meat of it ...

Renowned British historian Niall Ferguson recently told John Anderson that Trump carried more deterrence in his little finger than Harris would hold in her entire cabinet. That might be somewhat overstating things – an unusual occurrence of Scottish exaggeration – but it’s hard to argue with Ferguson’s general point.

Renowned Niall blathering with that hick from the stix?

Indeed, indeed. Courtesy of The Bulwark, a bastion of sanity in these troubled times, and The Wheels on the Bus Go Off, and Off, and Off, and... a great example of that deterrence in the little finger:

You know, when I say insane asylums, and then I say Dr. Hannibal Lecter. Does anybody know? They go crazy. They say, “Oh, he brings up these names.” And of, well, that’s genius, right? Dr. Hannibal Lecter. There’s nobody worse than him. Silence of the Lambs. Who the hell else would even remember that? I have a great memory. But they always hit me. I don’t bring it up too much, because they have to take such a—“he brought up Hannibal Lecter, what does that have to do with this? What does it—” It has everything to do with it, right? He was, that’s who we’re allowing into our country. And we don’t want to allow that into our country. So I’ve done something for you that I haven’t done in 20 speeches. I’ve brought up Dr. Hannibal Lecter. And we’re allowing him in. You watch, these fake people will say, “Again he brought up Hannibal Lecter. Has absolutely nothing to do.” You know I do the weave, right? The weave. It’s genius. You bring up Hannibal Lecter. You mention insane asylum, Hannibal Lecter, you go, oh. Now, there’ll be a time in life when the weave won’t finish properly at the bottom. And then we can talk. But right now it’s pure genius, hey. I have an uncle, my uncle, Uncle John, my father’s brother. Forty-one years at MIT, longest-serving professor. So many degrees he didn’t know what the hell to do with them all. And the most complicated—I understand a lot of this stuff. You know, I believe in that. I mean, Jack Nicklaus is not going to produce a bad golfer. Right? You know, that’s the way it works. Uh, it’s just one of those things. It’s in the family, and it’s—whatever. But we have to save this country. We’d better save this country.

Never mind, whatever, it's just one of those things, it's a bro thing ...

Trump will want to spend more on defence than Harris will. The US defence budget is way behind where it needs to be. But, more importantly, America’s adversaries will find Trump just as unpredictable as everyone else does. And he’s unpredictable in a way that can help US strategic interests.
Henry Kissinger famously told the Soviets that Richard Nixon was a madman and that he could overreact or escalate at very short notice. Nixon was anything but a madman. But it seemed an effective image.
Ronald Reagan came into office with the reputation of a fierce and militaristic Cold War hawk. In fact Reagan, the greatest of the modern presidents, projected magnificent moral clarity in the Cold War conflict but was extremely careful and parsimonious, as it were, in the use of American force.

At this point the reptiles interrupted with a snap of Tricky Dick and a war criminal, labelled so the readership knew who they were as Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger.




So far, so much bromancer padding good ... as on and on he rambled in the manner of the MM... and surely here the pond readership might find something to stimulate the senses and produce a comment.

This paradox is at the heart of the conservative appeal in national security. The more you desire peace, the more you should prepare for war.
There was a moment in Reagan’s presidency where he satirised himself by saying we are about to launch missiles against Russia, without realising that TV cameras and mikes were switched on. It was clearly and instantly communicated to the Russians that this was not a real statement. And of course the left-of-centre media went bananas against Reagan. Yet somehow or other, through the strange osmosis of popular media even back in those pre-internet days, it reinforced the message, to the Russians and everyone else that you better not mess with Reagan.
While of course it is almost an obscenity to compare the crude and at times repulsive Trump to Reagan, nonetheless there was certainly something of this military caution, buttressed by the threat of horrendously tough action if the president deemed it necessary, in Trump’s first term.
During this election, Trump has campaigned against the endless wars that he says the Democrats have got America involved in. Trump needs to be a bit careful here. If he gives Americans, and the world, the idea that it’s never worth America’s while to take military action unless its own sovereign territory is directly attacked, he could very well undermine his own greatest strategic strength.
But of course everyone knows that Trump can change direction on a dime. If a foreign power humiliates the Trump White House, Trump would almost certainly react very aggressively.
After this dramatic but low-content fantasy island campaign we’ve just had, it’s tempting to say that we have no idea how either Trump or Harris would actually govern. I might have said that myself. But on reflection they both have highly indicative records.

Star wars anyone?

How would a bromancer piece be considered suitable without a snap of Ronnie Raybun in four star general salute mode?




Speaking of shooting at journalists and Liz Cheney and the lust for American-style violence in general, the pond always preferred Ronnie Raygun in Don Siegel's version of The Killers, as a dying Lee Marvin takes him and Angie out, and tries stagger off with the loot, resulting in an epic death scene...






Yep, almost anything rather than wading through the bromancer ...

Trump was president for four years. Harris was Vice-President for four years. And as she herself says, there’s nothing that Joe Biden did as president that she would have done differently.
Nothing stands more starkly to Trump’s discredit than the way he egged on the mob on January 6. But before that his record as president was very defensible. He did pay for defence. He had a good economy. He made a strong effort to control US borders. The Abraham Accords were magnificent. The employment rates for blacks and Hispanics were at historic highs. And he was very good for Australia.
And although, in my view grotesquely, he often spoke flatteringly of China’s Xi Jinping and Russia’s Vladimir Putin, Xi and Putin found Trump extremely difficult to deal with.
Trump revolutionised US debate and policy on China and Biden mostly stuck with Trump’s China policy. Trump imposed more sanctions on Russia than any president had done; he strong­armed Western Europe into spending more on defence, a very bad development for Russia; and he pursued policies that created energy independence for the US, which put Washington in a position of greater leverage in all its key strategic relationships.

Could this simpering, delusional rambling get any worse? Guess what the pond found in its mail box, despite its very best endeavours to keep the crap out ...




May the long absent lord bless the pond? In the pond's experience, She's often a prize bitch ...

Inevitably after an epic bout of rampant stupidity, the bromancer tried to rescue the situation with a gigantic billy goat butt ...

… Baby, you understand me now?
If sometimes you see that I'm mad
Don'tcha know that no one alive can always be an angel?
When everything goes wrong, you see some bad
… But oh, I'm just a soul whose intentions are good
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood
… Oh, baby, I'm just human
Don't you know I have faults like anyone?
Sometimes I find myself alone regretting some little foolish thing
Some simple thing that I've done
… 'Cause I'm just a soul whose intentions are good
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood
Don't let me be misunderstood
… I try so hard so please don't let me be misunderstood

The song put it better, but you can see the mad, bad and foolish thing at work ...

I don’t want to be misunderstood. I think Trump a gravely unsatisfactory political leader. His chaotic methods and his constant negotiations, while they are effective when he’s on his game, dangerously personalise strategic fundamentals. They also involve Trump frequently telling lies and reversing himself. Whereas for the whole of my life I had the idea that the word of an American president meant a great deal.

No need to relax. That bout of billy goat buttism is quickly followed by a correction of the usual reptile kind ...

Harris’s record is truly awful. She has generally been the most left-wing senator and Democrat politician of them all. She didn’t make a big impression as veep because she never made a big impression on anything. She was fully caught up in the toxic identity politics of the California liberal left.
Biden seems to have chosen her because he promised to choose an African-American woman and because he judged that her mediocrity and general ineffectiveness meant she would never be a credible alternative to him. When he was elected, despite what he implied in some interviews, Biden always planned to stay for two terms. Having a weak Vice-President helped that.

At this point the reptiles interrupted with a snap of the Satanic anti-Christ, apparently born of Malaysian and Samoan heritage, a Tuckyo notion that delighted Malaysians:

(Malaysia's Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Mohamad) ...remarked on Instagram: "Thank you for bringing this to our attention, Mr. Carlson. We were not aware that a Malaysian was running for the office of US President."

"Should Puan Kamala win the race, we are delighted to invite her to #balikkampung and try some #nasigorengUSA?,"




The caption? More of the bleeding obvious, Kamala Harris speaks at a campaign rally in Michigan, but not to worry, the bromancer was on the final stretch:

Before his disastrous debate performance made his candidacy completely unviable, one of the main arguments among Democrats for keeping Biden in office was that replacing him would mean going to Harris and she had nothing to offer.
Harris’s career has been built on patronage and has always rested comfortably on the left. She has made a few stylistic gestures to Republican-inspired patriotism – such as having the Democratic convention chant “USA! USA!” But she still offers vast new spending and will go along with the left of her party. She’ll be Biden but worse.

The pond was surprised that the bromancer didn't take the next step and mention that Harris's career was built on blow jobs, but perhaps the sight of a presidential candidate performing a blow job on a microphone put him off ... and so to the bromancer's concluding flourish:

Biden appointed many staffers, academics and NGO leaders to senior positions in his administration. They were mostly centrist or centre left.
Harris doesn’t like any of them because she was condemned to obscurity as Vice-President, given a few assignments she fluffed and then more or less hidden in protective custody. She will appoint fellow leftists plus Obama administration holdovers, leftovers and retreads.
There’s nothing in any of that to give any confidence to Australia. If Trump imposes the maximum tariffs he’s talking about, that would be highly disruptive. But Trump showed in his first term a great propensity finally to compromise. He can’t appoint extremists to his cabinet because they won’t be confirmed by the Senate. The Republicans at best will have a tiny majority, 51 or 52 to 49 or 48, in the Senate, whereas you need 60 votes to confirm a cabinet appointee.
America will survive under either president. Talk of civil war is nonsense. The very latest shift seems to favour Harris coming back against an earlier very narrow Trump lead. No one at this stage can predict the result. But of two wildly unsatisfactory candidates, Trump would likely be better for Australia.

The MM might likely be better for journalism in Australia, or at least might help in fixing the lizard Oz:

LITITZ, Pa. — Donald Trump told a crowd on Sunday that he wouldn’t mind if someone shot at the news media present at his rally here, escalating his violent rhetoric at one of his closing campaign events where he repeatedly veered off-message.
Trump made the remark while complaining about the bulletproof glass surrounding him onstage — a fixture at his outdoor events since an attempt to assassinate him at a rally in July.
“I have this piece of glass here,” Trump said. “But all we have really over here is the fake news, right? And to get me, somebody would have to shoot through the fake news.
“And I don’t mind that so much,” Trump said. “I don’t mind. I don’t mind.” The audience roared with laughter. (the much diminished WaPo, lurking behind a paywall)

What a laugh, what a hoot, how much better things will be in the golden age of sneakers free of the lizard Oz and the reptiles peddling faux news ... and it will save us from the ramblings of a scribbler who sounds as tired, almost as exhausted, as the MM himself, a disinterested, heedless, inattentive, lackadaisical, mechanical, repetitive, apathetic, careless, slipshod, slovenly, wooden wretch, going through the motions as a reptile columnist ...

As usual, the immortal Rowe caught the vibe ...




In all the detailing, there was a pleasing cameo for Faux Noise, perving on the grinder, as he grinds away at the pole with his allegedly Arnold Palmer-sized member ...




Monday, November 04, 2024

In which old favourite reptiles return to gush like Monday geysers, geezers if you will...

 

Immensely satisfying news:

General Jack D. Ripper: Mandrake, do you realize that in addition to fluoridating water, why, there are studies underway to fluoridate salt, flour, fruit juices, soup, sugar, milk... ice cream. Ice cream, Mandrake, children's ice cream.
Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: [very nervous] Lord, Jack.
General Jack D. Ripper: You know when fluoridation first began?
Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: I... no, no. I don't, Jack.
General Jack D. Ripper: Nineteen hundred and forty-six. 1946, Mandrake. How does that coincide with your post-war Commie conspiracy, huh? It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hard-core Commie works.
Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Uh, Jack, Jack, listen... tell me, tell me, Jack. When did you first... become... well, develop this theory?
General Jack D. Ripper: [somewhat embarassed] Well, I, uh... I... I... first became aware of it, Mandrake, during the physical act of love.
Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Hmm.
General Jack D. Ripper: Yes, a uh, a profound sense of fatigue... a feeling of emptiness followed. Luckily I... I was able to interpret these feelings correctly. Loss of essence.
Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Hmm.
General Jack D. Ripper: I can assure you it has not recurred, Mandrake. Women uh... women sense my power and they seek the life essence. I, uh... I do not avoid women, Mandrake.
Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: No.
General Jack D. Ripper: But I... I do deny them my essence.

The pond never gets tired of quoting Dr Strangelove and its prophetic insights. 

Meanwhile RFK Jr: 




Meanwhile eminent expert Donald J. Trump: Trump told NBC News on Sunday that he had not spoken to Kennedy about fluoride yet, “but it sounds OK to me. You know it’s possible.”

Meanwhile back to the lizard Oz and the pond had completely forgotten that Monday was Caterist day, with the mission to crater any nonsense about climate change.

In a alternative world, you might expect an interesting, reflective column about the impact of climate change on recent Spanish floods. 

Say in the sadly diminished WaPo (paywall): Spain’s floods have killed more than 200. Why have they been so deadly?, Climate change helps explains why the storms and floods were so extreme.

Over at Politico.eu: Spain’s ‘monster’ floods expose Europe’s unpreparedness for climate change.

Over at the Beeb: Scientists say climate change made Spanish floods worse.

Over at NPR: Hundreds are dead in Spain's floods. Scientists see a connection to climate change.

Inevitably at the Graudian: Spain’s deadly floods and droughts are two faces of the climate crisis coin

Cranked up to 11 at the Graudian: We are in danger of forgetting what the climate crisis means: extinction.

Locally you might wonder about that Broken Hill superstorm, an intense cell, and what might have contributed to the intensity of that cell. Was it another portent of the shape of things to come, and if so, what to do about it?

You might respond with Broken Hill fiasco shows why we need to rethink the grid, and turn it upside down. Inter alia:

...Watt says rethinking the grid from the ground up, will empower rather than alienate customers as renewable energy increases, and boost resilience – which is even more important as the grid faces challenges from climate change and bushfires and storms.

...The country has a long stringy grid vulnerable to the increasing intensity of natural disasters – whether they are fire, flood or storms.

Faces challenges? Increasing intensity? Nah, you might just crater any thoughts about such matters.

Broken Hill’s power outage can’t just be swept aside

Three years ago, Transgrid boasted the outback town could run on a renewable energy microgrid. It was blocked from shutting down two diesel generators, a move Chris Bowen described as ‘really silly and perverse’.

As usual the reptiles began the Caterist piece with an illustrative piece and a caption, A power station on Pinnacles Road at Broken Hill in far west NSW. Picture: Richard Dobson




That was possibly the last immediate connection to reality in the cratering to follow:

Broken Hill’s two-week experiment in fossil-fuel-free living ended at 8.41pm local time last Thursday when its connection to the east coast grid finally was restored. Transgrid issued a press release thanking the community for its patience and announced that the emergency diesel generators it had trucked in would remain in place.
Three years ago, Transgrid boasted that the outback town could run on a renewable energy microgrid if the line to the outside world went down. It was so confident that it sought permission from the Australian Energy Regulator to decommission the two diesel generators installed in the early 1980s. The AER said no, a decision criticised as “really silly and perverse” by Chris Bowen, who held it up as an example of the antiquated energy market thinking he intended to fix.
“A little while ago Transgrid wanted and suggested that to help Broken Hill, they would put in a microgrid of renewable energy,” the Climate Change and Energy Minister told David Speers on the ABC’s Insiders in August 2022. “It was much more reliable, with much lower emissions, and they were told at that point, ‘No, you’ve got to keep your old diesel generators running.’
“It wasn’t the regulator’s fault … they haven’t been legally able to take into account emissions reduction, and it’s been ridiculous, and we’ve fixed it.”

Handily the reptiles knew that nobody had the first clue about who to blame and so it inserted this caption Energy Minister Chris Bowen. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman, and snap:




That set the tremendous expert in the movement of flood waters in quarries, the cratering Caterist, right off:

Bowen has yet to comment on the fortnight of rolling blackouts across the NSW far west that began when seven transmission towers collapsed on the 260km high-voltage line to Buronga.
He was not there to witness the indignity of AGL’s new mega battery being recharged by diesel generators or watch the Silverton wind turbines sit idle because they weren’t connected to the grid. He didn’t see Broken Hill residents hunting for the off switch on their rooftop solar arrays because their fluctuating output tripped the diesel generators.
To describe the Silver City’s experience as a setback for Bowen’s dream of turning Australia into a nuclear-free clean energy superpower would be an understatement. Broken Hill was the renewable energy industry’s Potemkin village, the recipient of $650m of green investment and the proposed location for the world’s biggest advanced compressed-air energy storage plant.

Next came another caption Workers trying to restore power to Broken Hill after a violent storm has left the town without electricity for days. Picture: Supplied/Transgrid and snap:




The pond treasured the interruptions. There was no way out of here, as the joker said to the thief, and bugger all chance of relief from climate science denialism:

In 2018, Broken Hill City Council announced its goal to become Australia’s first carbon-free city by 2030. Three years ago the mayor at the time, Darriea Turley, welcomed the announcement that AGL was proceeding with plans to build a grid-scale battery, which the company claimed would be a reliable backup power source for 10,000 homes.
“This is a great opportunity for Broken Hill and renewable energies,” Turley told the ABC. “What they will see is when there is an outage, the battery would click into operation.”
AGL had badly misled Turley and her fellow councillors. When the storm hit at about midnight local time on Wednesday, October 16, the battery clicked offline, not on. The town sat in darkness for several hours until the single operating backup diesel generator could be turned on.

Then came another caption Darriea Turley, the former mayor of Broken Hill. Picture: Dylan Robinson and snap:




On and on the flood waters in quarries expert ranted:

AGL was not prepared to keep a $41m battery fully charged, primed for that just-in-case moment. The battery was dispatching power into the national electricity market from early evening on the day of the storm.
The battery was offline for more than eight days while it was reprogrammed to feed into the local grid and recharged with rooftop solar and diesel. Silverton and the Broken Hill solar plant did not resume operation until the region was reconnected to the grid last Thursday. Turley’s successor as mayor, Tom Kennedy, was pictured wielding a shovel at the soil-turning photo-op for the battery in November 2022. He told the ABC the battery closely aligned with the council’s desire to see the Silver City at the forefront of renewable energy and energy storage.
Last week he told Chris Kenny on Sky News, “There’s no way that renewables at this time are capable of supplying Broken Hill … The reality is it’s not consistent power. You don’t have that baseload power, so for Broken Hill it’s almost useless.”
The principle lesson from Broken Hill is that a stable, consistent baseload supply produced by rotating turbines is essential for stabilising the grid’s frequency and underwriting fluctuating demand. Converting DC power from wind and solar to synchronised AC current becomes harder the more renewable energy is put into the system.

The rant was interrupted with another caption Broken Hill mayor Tom Kennedy. Picture: Jonathan Ng and snap:




Then it was on with the ranting about renewables:

Yet at the time of writing, AGL was still boasting on its website that its Broken Hill Battery Energy Storage System facility with advanced grid-forming inverters “will support the reliable supply of electricity to Broken Hill in the event of line failure and provide efficient grid support for the region”.
Elsewhere it was claiming that its part-owned subsidiary was harnessing enough energy at the Silverton Wind Farm to power about 98,000 average Australian homes, while the Broken Hill Solar Farm would meet the needs of 19,000 more.
Not everyone has been as quick as Kennedy to wise up to the monstrous deception the renewable energy industry practised. Last Monday, Australia Institute research director Rod Campbell appeared before a parliamentary committee on nuclear power to argue for the rapid phasing out of fossil fuels, “which is what climate science demands”. Nuclear power was a distraction, he claimed.

Another snap and caption Broken Hill family Sarah and Nick Pratt with their kids, Mimi, Eden and Leo. Picture: Richard Dobson interrupted the ranting:




Then it was time to give Ted and nuking the country centre stage, though the pond hasn't the first clue what nuking the country is for, what with the alleged climate change crisis just a bunch of hooey, at least if you read the collective works of the cratering Caterist:

Campbell said he had “spent a lot of time looking at economic modelling” and concluded “the capital costs of nuclear are very high and very uncertain”.
Opposition climate change and energy spokesman Ted O’Brien asked Campbell what his extensive knowledge of economic modelling had told him about the total system cost of the government’s renewables-only plan.
Campbell: “I don’t know. I haven’t researched that.”
O’Brien: “But aren’t you arguing that including nuclear as part of the mix would be more expensive than that?”
Campbell: “It would be more expensive.”
O’Brien: “You started off explaining that you’ve spent a lot of time doing modelling. So, do you know what the total system cost is for Labor’s plan to get to net zero by 2050?
Campbell: “No, I’ve never modelled that. I’ve done a lot of economic modelling through my career. I haven’t done much of it on the NEM itself and the ISP.”
O’Brien: “How have you drawn that conclusion then?”
Campbell: “Because, as I said at the top, you don’t need to do a lot of modelling to see that capital costs of nuclear energy are really high and really uncertain.”
Tellingly, the Australia Institute posted a video of Campbell’s testimony on YouTube, suggesting they weren’t aware that he’d made a clown of himself. The anti-nuclear left is immune to contrary facts, paying homage to “the science” while disregarding the laws of physics, urging us to abandon fossil fuels by this time tomorrow while never once considering the constraints of engineering.

Remember, all the splendid work of Nick Cater is senior fellow at the Menzies Research Centre and is a certified expert in the movement of flood waters in quarries.

Then came a pond dilemma. The pond has been limiting itself to a reptile a day on doctor's orders, but look at this succulent menu:




Sadly the pond had to rule out Killer Kreighton doing over Kovid for the zillionth time, and Lord Downer doing his best to recover from his shameful instigation of all that chatter about Russia.

For old times sake, the pond simply had to go with Major Mitchell on a Monday, and The Democrat blunders that could put Donald Trump back in the White House, Kamala Harris’s main problem is not that she covered for Joe Biden. It’s her association with California’s extreme identity politics.

Now the pond has already extensively covered the US on the weekend, thanks in no small part to prattling Polonius, and so was happy to just let the Major show off his inclination to verbal diarrhoea, disguised in a flimsy way as a survey of the media, when actually he's all in with General Ripper.

As usual the reptiles began with a caption The problem for Democrats is Vice-President Kamala Harris can’t really separate herself from the poor economic performance and high government spending of Biden, and a tremendously inventive collage:




Then it was on with the Major:

Wealthy voters on the left seem to prefer confirmation bias over journalistic acumen from their preferred media sources.
Only last Wednesday, ABC Radio National breakfast host Patricia Karvelas complained about the number of texts from listeners criticising her for following the story of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s relationship with former Qantas boss Alan Joyce, one of the best domestic political stories of the year.
It’s worse in the United States where The New York Times and broadcasters such as MSNBC and CNN scrutinise only conservatives but are rewarded by readers and viewers for their bias.

At this point the pond must rudely interrupt, if only to note that the Major has completely overlooked the NY Times fabulous reputation for both siderism, dubious headlines and "sanewashing".  


In recent days, I came across what seems to be a new term to describe much media treatment of Donald Trump: “sane-washing.” This is similar to the more common phrase “normalization,” but it extends beyond what we’ve seen for years—the media reporting on Trump as if he is a regular politician who operates within the conventional bounds of political spin and human actions—to covering up (or sidestepping or downplaying) Trump’s apparent cognitive flaws.
A good example occurred last week. As you might have noticed—especially if you read the Dumbass Comment of the Week feature in the most recent issue (the premium version for subscribers)—Trump, while delivering a speech at the Economic Club of New York, went on a long, somewhat nonsensical ramble when asked whether he would support child care legislation if he returns to the White House. He began his answer with a heaping portion of word salad: “Well, I would do that, and we're sitting down, and I was, somebody, we had Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka was so, uh, impactful on that issue. It's a very important issue. But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I'm talking about, that, because, look, child care is child care is.” Then, in nearly incomprehensible sentences, he suggested that the massive tariffs he intends to impose on imported goods—a policy that numerous economists say will cause inflation, increase the deficit, and serve as a massive tax hike for middle- and low-income Americans—will generate money that could be used for child care. Read his response for yourself. It was not the answer of an intellectually sharp (or perhaps competent) person. And it would be reasonable for an American to worry about someone who thinks and speaks in this manner inhabiting the White House.
Yet this is how the New York Times covered Trump’s speech. Under the headline (in the hard-copy edition) “Trump Backs Panel On Efficiency,” it led with the fact that during this address Trump “called for the creation of an economic efficiency commission” that would be headed by billionaire troll Elon Musk and recommend “drastic reforms” for cutting government waste that would save “trillions of dollars.” This was a positive framing of the event. Though the third paragraph characterized Trump’s speech as “sometimes meandering” and the end of the article noted that Trump replied to the child care question with a “jumbled and winding answer,” the most important paper in the land did not shine the spotlight on Trump’s incoherence and inability to fashion a straightforward reply to a basic query.

Sorry, the pond promises not to interrupt again, what with the Major determined not to shine the spotlight on Trump’s incoherence and inability to fashion a straightforward reply to a basic query.

The Washington Post, among the worst of America’s Trump “derangement syndrome” products, was hit by a subscriber strike when owner Jeff Bezos decided a fortnight ago that his masthead would not editorialise in favour of either candidate in Tuesday’s (Wednesday AEST) US presidential election.
Readers who quit the newspaper in protest apparently forgot it had been a relentless, one-eyed campaigner against Donald Trump since before the 2016 election.
Nor had it ever seen the slightest sign of mental decline by incumbent President Joe Biden until his confusion could no longer be denied when debating Trump in late June.
This column is amused by the loyalty of Democrat voters to news products that seem unable to report the truth about Democrats; to own up to their mistakes about Republicans; or to predict political events correctly.
And it’s not just the US outlets mentioned above that are the problem. The ABC spent years pushing the false Russiagate narrative we now know was a Democrat National Committee stitch-up supported by Obama-era intelligence figures – the same ones who mistakenly dismissed the Hunter Biden laptop story by the New York Post in late 2020 as Russian disinformation.
The New York Times has also been ratcheting up its anti-Trump news and opinion pieces. The pace of these stories accelerated after October 23 when it published influential pollster and professional gambler Nate Silver saying the polls were too close to call but his “gut instinct” was for a Trump win.
The problem for Democrats is Vice-President Kamala Harris can’t really separate herself from the poor economic performance and high government spending of Biden.

At this point the reptiles finally interrupted the Major with a caption US Vice-President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris speaks during a campaign rally in Reno, Nevada, on October 31. Picture: AFP and a snap of the Satanic anti-Christ,  with a sinister smirk as she prepares to devour the United States:




The pond thought that the Major had been badly served by a lack of snaps - why should the Caterist catch all the glory? - and so decided to help out with a toon:




Back to the Major:

Nor can she criticise Biden’s poor handling of wars in Ukraine and Gaza, or timidity on China, Russia, North Korea and Iran. Conversely, voters seem likely to accept Trump’s boast that today’s wars would not have occurred had he still been president.

Oh yes, JD Vance and the Mango Mussolini are going to sort out Ukraine - give it to Russia - and Gaza - give it to Benji - so that the MM can build a fine hotel with Ocean Views. 

Sorry, back to the Major:

Not a natural public policy person, Harris is left with only an exaggerated negative campaign against Trump. Last week she was happy to call him a fascist and Hitler wannabe. Yet she and her media supporters insist it’s Trump who is divisive.
The Wall Street Journal has been honest in assessing Trump’s problems. His refusal to accept defeat in 2020 and the Capitol riot on January 6, 2021 should have disqualified him from public office, it has argued.
Yet the legal pursuit of Trump by Democrat state prosecutors, and the party’s tendency to deride Trump supporters, have only rallied support for him.
Bret Stephens, a thoughtful conservative who left the WSJ for the Times in 2017, was close to the truth in a piece he wrote on the cultural assumptions of the left about Trump voters. The condescension of Democrat grandees – think the Obamas – towards ordinary voters is, at least to this column, every bit as damaging as Hillary Clinton’s 2016 “basket of deplorables” comment about working-class mid-western voters who had once voted for the Democrats but moved to Trump.
Wrote Stephens: “Aside from being gratuitous and self-defeating – what kind of voter is going to be won over by name-calling – it’s also mostly wrong. Trump’s supporters overwhelmingly are people who think the Biden-Harris years have been bad for them and the country.”

That description of Stephens as a "thoughtful conservative" did at least give the pond a howl of laughter before carrying on:

Biden effectively showcased Stephens’ argument himself on Wednesday in response to a comedian’s remarks at a Trump rally calling Puerto Rico a “floating island of garbage’’. Biden said “the only garbage I see floating out there is his supporters”. It hurt Harris because it confirms what people think: rich Democrats despise ordinary voters.
The Journal’s former editor-in-chief, Gerard Baker, nailed the problem on October 28. Voters can see all the problems with Trump and still be concerned about the Democrats manipulating those very reasonable concerns “to validate retrospectively the damage they have wrought in the past four years and approve proactively what they might do in the next four”.
“Many Americans want to tell the Democrats: ‘You don’t get to drive the country ever further into your progressive dystopia … and then turn around and say to the voters: Sorry but it’s us or Hitler’.”
The biggest Democrat blunder has been attempts by the party’s district attorneys in state jurisdictions to destroy Trump in the courts: the so-called lawfare campaign that has driven voter sympathy for Trump.

The reptiles did at least provide the Major with an audiovisual distraction, a tie in and cross over to Sky, with the caption: Curtin University Dean of Global Future Joe Siracusa claims the US election has been a “dirty” race saying former president Donald Trump “survived” the weaponisation of the just system. “I can tell you that this last election is unprecedented; in this sense, it is a very dirty election,” Mr Siracusa told Sky News Australia. “The Biden government threw everything they could at former president Trump – Trump survived the slings and arrows of the weaponisation of the justice system.”




What to say about Joe, Sky News(AU!) favourite? That title Dean of Global Future pretty much says it all.

Given the visual stimulus, the pond thought it might help out with another 'toon:




Then the Major delivered his final thoughts:

Many journalists and lawyers have criticised the Stormy Daniels hush-money trial, arguing that for most of the country’s legal history this would have been a misdemeanour at worst.
Even the UK’s New Statesman, one of the most left-wing journals in the English language, has criticised this lawfare.
On June 5 it published Sohrab Ahmari, founder and editor of online magazine Compact, arguing progressives around the world needed to speak out about political partiality in the US legal system and the endless persecution of Trump.
The Wall Street Journal nailed the problem in a July 9 editorial after the Supreme Court found the presidency enjoys constitutional immunity for official acts.
The Journal Editorial Board wrote: ‘’Is there a hall of fame for political backfires? Democrats cheered on the prosecutions of Mr Trump, hoping they’d guarantee his defeat. Instead they energised his re-election effort.”
This became obvious after Trump was shot in the ear at a Pennsylvania rally on July 13 and got back to his feet fist-pumping and yelling “fight, fight, fight” into the microphone.
Yet it’s not like Trump has no policy vulnerabilities.
Fifty per cent of voters now approve of the job he did as president, but Harris is vulnerable economically because of Biden’s overreach, especially on the inflationary and green Inflation Reduction Act.
A better candidate could have made a serious point about Trump’s plan to impose tariffs on all imports to America. This will only increase prices for Americans and bring tariff reprisals.
A poll of 50 economists published in the Journal on October 14 found most thought Trump’s policies, while they might stimulate growth, would add more to inflation and the federal deficit than Harris’s.
For this column’s money, Harris’s main problem is not that she covered for Biden, failed as his “border tsar” to halt illegal immigration, or is weak on policy. It’s her association with California’s extreme identity politics.
While left-wing journalists write about Trump’s misogyny, violent language and propensity to cosy up to dictators, a lot of voters are more suspicious of politicians and media who think gender, race and patriotism are simply social constructs.

Actually the pond suspects that the Major is a social construct, or perhaps has been replaced by an AI bot, or perhaps, just a canny Major Mitchell parrot.

Speaking of AI, some might wonder why the pond has reverted from screen caps to text. It's simple really. Last month the blog's database recorded some 112,000 hits, at a time when the pond was largely absent. The real views, as recorded by Statcounter, are vastly smaller.

The pond thinks it might be AI bots, out patrolling the full to overflowing web, sucking in words in an attempt to get AI smarter than humans. 

What better way to fuck with AI and reveal it for the sham it is, than to stuff it full of lizard Oz reptile nonsense? 

Let the bots come and scrape the very bottom of the barrel, and then see how intelligent AI manages to sound. 

Or perhaps it might result in a thousand year Uncle Leon Reich. Whatever, trust AI at your peril, which is inevitably why lazy bureaucrats of the Victorian kind will march in trusting style into the belly of the beast.

And so to wrap up proceedings with the immortal Rowe:





The inspiration is well known but the pond will repeat it anyway:






How much better than denim overalls are the MM's fork and tatts: